As salaamu alaykum brothers, sisters, friends and foes. Please like, share and comment on this video, as well as subscribing to the 5Pillars RUclips channel! Jazakallah khayran.
Anonymous Brother not everyone who rebels is a Khariji, as those who rebel are of different categories, as for Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab rahimahullah he is not infallible and he was wrong on things and he made mistakes and he is open to criticism just like any other Scholar.
@Anonymous Brother Did you even watch the video? This comment shows a lot because you clearly took nothing away from the video. He addressed all these points you mention.
I didn't knew much about this bro Hajji, only things here and there, but my God that was intense. Much needed ! I'm grateful to you Dilly and Hajji May Allah heal the ummah and unify our hearts
What iv never understood about these ppl on the Salafi movement is that they will openly refute Muslim brothers who are trying their best to do good but they would never refute tyrants leaders and ppl who cause oppression on Muslims in Muslim countries. I find it a contradiction.
There will appear after me rulers, they will not guide by my guidance, and they will not establish my Sunnah; there will be amongst them men whose hearts will be hearts of devils in the bodies of men!” He was asked: “How should I behave, O Messenger of Allāh, if I reach that time?” He replied: “Hear and obey the Amīr (i.e. the ruler), even if he beats your back and [illegally] takes your wealth - hear and obey! Sahih Muslim Brothers who have not studied and are misguiding people because they have no correct or authentic knowledge. It is obligatory to clarify the doubts that these ignorant muslim brothers bring so they do not misguide people - Refutation is how our deen is preserved! Stopping us from becoming like d Christians and Jews. As for the oppressive rulers they are oppressing them in the life of this world and their judgement is with allah but they are not misguiding the people in their deen unlike these so called ignorant Da'ees like Hajji above.
Tariq ibn Shihab reported: A man asked the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, “What is the best jihad?” The Prophet said, “A word of truth in front of a tyrannical ruler.” Source: Musnad Aḥmad 18449 Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Nawawi عَنْ طَارِقِ بْنِ شِهَابٍ أَنَّ رَجُلًا سَأَلَ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ أَيُّ الْجِهَادِ أَفْضَلُ قَالَ كَلِمَةُ حَقٍّ عِنْدَ سُلْطَانٍ جَائِرٍ 18449 مسند أحمد مسند العشرة المبشرين بالجنة 117 المحدث النووي خلاصة حكم المحدث إسناده صحيح في تحقيق رياض الصالحين
@@hassan333wa Muawiyyah is a Companion of the Messenger of Allah and is in Paradise as Allah and his Messenger promised, he was not a tyrant. Rather he was seeking justice for his cousin Uthman ibn Affan and made ijtihaad
I often come back to this episode. I'm learning a lot, a lot of history (which I love) and politics and common sense! Backed by islamic proofs! Also very relevant right now
They made a big mistake here on Islamic proofs to say the least. 1) **Part 4 - Bro Hajji - Obeying the Ruler - Sunnah or..** 2) **Bro Hajji Part 5: Misquoting Al-Mualimi** 3) **Bro Hajji And The Straw That Broke The...** all three are by thorn in the throats, I don't agree with them in all situations.
They made a big mistake here. 1) **Part 4 - Bro Hajji - Obeying the Ruler - Sunnah or..** 2) **Bro Hajji Part 5: Misquoting Al-Mualimi** 3) **Bro Hajji And The Straw That Broke The...** all three are by thorn in the throats,
These madakhila never fooled me for one second; even before I heard from others, I had these same arguments against them. Anyone with a sound mind and reason can easily disrupt their weak claims.
Anyone with a sound Fitrah/sound mind can see through their Satanic deception, its clear the madakhila are upon falsehood and are clearly an overzealous cult.
you mean bro kariji who pushes kawarij views on hussain supporting the shia deception and murder to him? who lies on books and slanders Muslims and pushes war! shame!
@Ibrahim Ibn Mahmud There is no need to lie. If you can find disgusting manners of Hajji then you can surely find his statements where he said he doesn't advocate for Khrooj but that he is against Shamsi and co and their labelling of everyone who does khrooj as Khariji.
@Ibrahim Ibn Mahmud You are free to believe whatever you like. But when it comes to the claims, unless you have contrary evidence to his words that he doesn't call for khrooj, you have only a claim and no evidence. Regarding his frequent videos on khrooj is due to Shamsi who approached him 1st and dawah man who made video against him 1st. If I take the statement of Ibn Abd al Barr as face value and the way you quoted then major Sahaba and Salaf are considered Khwarij including Hussein RA, Zubair RA and others. If you believe they are khwarij then you have no business being a Muslim, and If you believe they are not Khwarij then your evidence falls flat on its face and doesn't represent the reality properly. Don't disrespect Sahaba or you will be asked about it on the day of jydgement.
@Ibrahim Ibn Mahmud You do know that there are hadiths that support rebellion. There are also salaf who took part in rebellion and there are statements that don't claim everyone who did khrooj is khariji. Selective ahadith and selective quotation posting is not gonna help your case since possibility of rebellion and rebellion being not haram is also present is ahadith books. I guess you also believe that just like Hussein RA, no person from salaf ever rebelled. Here are some ahadiths who show the possibility of rebellion and it being not haram in all cases. Al-Bukhari narrated on the authority of Junada b. abi Umayyah who said: We went to ‘Ubadah b. as-Samit when he was sick and we said: May Allah (swt) guide you. Inform us of a Hadith from the Messenger of Allah (saw) so Allah may benefit you from it. He said, the Messenger of Allah (saw) called upon us and we gave him the Bai’ah, and he said, of that which he had taken from us, that we should give him the pledge to listen and obey, in what we like and dislike, in our hardship and ease, and that we should not dispute the authority of its people unless we saw open Kufr (kufr buwah) upon which we had a proof (burhan) from Allah. The hadith was reported by At-Tabarani as “kufran Surahan (open kufr)”, and as “unless the disobedience of Allah is bawahan”. It was also reported by Ahmad as “unless they order you of ithmin bawahan (open sin)”. Awf Ibnu Malik Al-Ashja'i said: "I heard the Messenger of Allah (SAW) say: 'The best of your Imams are those whom you love and they love you and whom you pray for and they pray for you, and the worst of your Imams are those whom you hate and they hate you and you curse them and they curse you.' We asked: 'O Messenger of Allah, shall we not then declare war on them?' He said: 'No, as long as they establish the prayer among you', [Muslim] Muslim reported on the authority of Umm Salama that the Messenger of Allah (SAW) said: "Ameers will be appointed over you, you recognise some of what they do and you disown some. Whoever recognised he is absolved from blame. Whoever disapproved (of their bad deeds) he is safe, but whoever consented and followed them (he is doomed.)" They said: "Should we not fight against them?" He (SAW) replied: "No, as long as they prayed." What is meant by establishing the prayer is to rule by Islam, that is to implement the rules of Shari'ah . This is because the whole of Islam is denoted here by naming part of it. This is common in Arabic, for instance Allah (SWT) says: "To free a neck" [4:92] which means to free the slave i.e. all of him and not just his neck. In this Hadith he (SAW) said: "As long as they establish the prayer among you." This means the establishment of all the rules not just the prayer and is a figurative form (kinayah) where basically the part is mentioned to refer to the whole. If you want I can post some views of different scholars as well. *Now you have a problem.* *You say rebellion is prohibited but salaf rebelled.* *You say rebellion is from Khwarij but salaf rebelled.* *You say there are ahadiths prohibiting rebellion but there are ahadiths which support it on conditions.* *You say scholars prohibit rebellion but there are major scholars who say in some cases it become obligatory and not a sin.* *The problem is for you and not for me because I don't claim rebellion is prohibited in every case.*
At 1:07:13 interestingly, when the Uthmaniyyah (Ottomans) defeated the Mamluks in Egypt, the Ottomans allowed the Mamluks to remain and rule Egypt but gave them more efficient administrative techniques. The mamluks remained until the french Napoleon came to Egypt. Both the Ottomans and the Mamluks dealt with Napoleon. So the Ottomans never wiped out the Mamluks but worked along them after defeating them.
May Allah SWT bless you with your efforts Akhi. May Allah preserve you Brother Hamza, Brother Hijab, Brother Haji and the rest. We need these podcasts in our native languages somehow. By Allah many muslims in our native countries like Pakistan Bangladesh are either lost, ignorant or have veils over their hearts. Shame that us living in Dar Ul Kuffr have much more islamic clarity then those living in Muslim majority countries. Many people's hearts are dead in our native countries. This is a issue that needs highlighting
you mean bro kariji who pushes kawarij views on hussain supporting the shia deception and murder to him? who lies on books and slanders Muslims and pushes war! shame!
@Ibrahim Ibn Mahmud Your point! He repeatedly apologised and besides, this behaviour is warranted because he has to deal with idiots who have IQ levels similar to room temperature or worse
@Ibrahim Ibn Mahmud oh STFU! You haven’t read a single Hadith with its proper context ever in your life now have you? If you are in front of me I’ll make you eat your own words mate! Now you are making me swear and that’s because of your own stupidity and not my fault! When we swear, it’s because of the nature of the stupidity coming from the other side ;otherwise maintaining good conduct and decorum is always the preferred method 100%. For your information, even the companions used to use foul language between themselves during their time! For example: may your mother disown you ثقلت كأمك , ، amongst many other swear / cuss words! They were human beings like us and not so different when we use something similar to this nature in our days and times! At the very least, no F bombs is being thrown around here even though that is warranted with idiots from your ilk! Don’t get religious with me boy, like I said, I will make you eat your own words!
@Ibrahim Ibn Mahmud LOL do you hear yourself talk sometimes? Then why bother investing your valuable time here? Like I said, it will be very easy for me to make mincemeat out of your words and make you eat it because you don’t seem to be consistent in following your own advice mate! Think before typing and take this constructive Naseeha from me
I listened to you on Mohammed Hijab channel! I am soooooooo happy I found your channel subhanallah very insightful and inspiring. Someone who stands for TRUTH, I absolutely love that. I remember listening to you on Zeeshan podcast long time ago haha! May Allah reward you! Assalam aleykoum
@@smeshcel3025 It's that easy to call someone a Khariji? Don't you know that that's a trait of the khawaarij? They would label ppl easily, and that's what you just did. You should really look to yourself rather than labelling others.
@@مسلمةالحمدلله-س6ز well i dont rebel againist muslim leaders or speak aganist them or worst of all call others to fight while im comfy at home. U dont need a astronaut to tell u when u see a rainbow. U dont need a zooligist to tell u what a lion is or isnt. There are things and traits thar are apparent this guy clearly and open is going againist the sunnah of our beloved prophet peace and blessings be upon him. We are muslim and we say it how it is. Omar ibn khata(ra) said "We jugde from the apparent". This whole concept of everybody sweep everybodies open misguidence under the rug is a christin belief and thars what has destroied other nations previous. We speak out against ahlul bida' to perserve this mighty deen not for the pleasure of u or any other person who wants everybody to just group hug. Brother this religion is good advice , and i advice you to read the rules for forbid that which is evio and enjoining what is good. Baraka Allahu feek akhi may Allah guide us all.
Wow Wallahi Deffo the best Podcast since you've started !!! Informative, Passionate Guest and I couldn't take my eyes off it. (On a sidenote all the future podcasts should be around 1.30 hours long).
@sc debates if anyone goes and comes back from the hajj pilgrimage and is desi(from the subcontinent region), they'll give that person the title, hajji, so i'm going to go out on a limb and say, he's already done hajj
@@أبوشغل yes. When you use demeaning terms towards ulema like Sh Rabee and and insult the Sharhus Sunnah of Imam al Barbahaari calling it a talmud, demeaning terms and insults are reciprocated
Masha'Allah, brilliant and very information, Bro Hadji seems like he is very fair and just with his views and willing to listen to all views with an open mind which is the total opposite to most Salafis who are seriously single minded and are not willing to listen to or learn any view which is different to theirs. Shame that most Salafis will not listen to this or Bro Haji, from my personal experience most Salafis want everyone to listen to them but are unwilling to listen to anyone belonging to another group, and they speak ill and call names anyone and everyone who is against their stance and position, Salafis will hate on people who advise them nicely and politely, there is no way they will like or listen to bro Hadji due to him being a bit harsh or impolite towards them, but then again they wouldn't listen to him even if he was polite.
@Abu Masood It is most non madkhali Salafi's also, i have close family who are salafis and hate Madkhalis yet they behave exactly as i have described, i know all Salafi's aint like that but far too many are from my experience. I dont have issue with Salafi's, actually get on very well with them except for the ones who just like to put you down and attach a label to you only because your not a Salafi, these types of Salafis dont want to really get on with any non Salafi anyway, I've been labelled by Salafis incorrectly many times without them even speaking to me and finding out what i believe.
@Abu Masood strongly disagree to that as its the same story with most Salafi's up and down the country unfortunatly, I've heard the same stories and experiences from countless people from around the UK in regards to their experiences with Salafi's and it almost always the same, and i always think to myself that I've also had identical experiences with Salafi's, and listening to bro hadji hes going through the same experience as i myself and cointless other people have had with Salafi's, im sure its not a coincidence, its as if a large majority of Salafis are Unison in their thinking, behaviour and charactristics, and this is due to the teachings they recive and learn from their teachers. Generally the only people who dont see this issue with Salafi's are Salafi's themselfs, or anyone who has not had much experience with them, they are the most intolerant sect amongst the Muslims that i have ever come across.
@@huntsman2877 Not the same at all, Bro Hajji doesn't go all guns blazing, shooting down anyone and everyone who's not part of his group unlike the Salafi's who are always gunning down anyone and everyone (whether Justly or unjustly) who are not part of their group.
you mean bro kariji who pushes kawarij views on hussain supporting the shia deception and murder to him? who lies on books and slanders Muslims and pushes war! shame!
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 Alhamdulillah bro Hajji is doing a fantastic job,,,.... Any sane logical person can see how is argument is consistent and sound...
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 do you not know about the history of MD ibn and Wahhab and his warmongering history ...it's not the eyes that are blind but the hearts
@@gkinguk Idolatry? like what? Like sophism & she'uh whose ideas bro cariji pushes & I oppose as a Muslim! View : **Nasir Hanbali** on bro haji You Iie & call me mushric? I will reply to you on judgement day for your Iies, esp. If you don't answer.
Wow mashaAllah awesome historical discussion! This really questions the sincerity of the salafis if they about Quran and Hadeeth or simply boot lickers!!! Disgraceful acts exposed.
you mean Saudis with Egypt beat israelis in 73.... and shut down the west... while cia backed iran the original jet bombers and took in exiled ql queda who iran and israelis used for war and lie on iraq wmds leading to isis who caused civil war who bro kariji supports... nice stupidity, no wonder kawarij end up with dajjal.
Why did hajji stopped refuting shia and shifted to refute sunnies and ask them to rebel and start wars in their homeland in the name of Islam? Wish these requests were targeting shia instead.
@Ibrahim Ibn Mahmud, so which ground Saudis are standing? Sunnah or their own will? Now salafis say no rebelling, then why did Saudi rebel with the help of Britsh(CRISTIANS).
@Ibrahim Ibn Mahmud As long as you do not support SPUBs or any other offshoots of that madkhali cult then i have no qualms with your viewpoint. Those cults are ruining pure salafi ideology.
Brilliant podcast filled with so much info, historical and textual context. subhanAllah. May Allah bless you both and keep our feet firm upon the truth.. aameen
Massive respect to brother Dilly for this episode, and the rest of their work. if you take guest suggestions, I would strongly suggest an interview with the Saudi dissident @almass3ari. Very few speak as forward as he does when it comes to politics in Islam.
I agree with your analysis of the Najdi dawah, but one thing made me cringe - when Dilly said ‘Rahimahullah’ for Muhammad Ali Pasha. The guy was a slimy and self-serving despot who eventually turned on the Ottomans themselves, and fought them TWICE and brought the Ottomans to the brink of collapse. I expected Brother Dilly to be more well read on Ottoman history, especially since he professes to have teachers in Istanbul.
look at Islam, Virtues of Banu Tamim : Bani Tameem constitute the majority of the Najd in Saudi Arabia. Recall Najd just means elevated land. Ibn Abdul Wahab At Tamimi's tribe in hadiths : Sahih Bukhaaree report of Abu Hurayra, "I have loved the tribe of Bani Tameem, ever since I heard three things the Messenger of Allah, Sallallahu Alayhi wa Sallam, said about them I heard him saying, these people, would stand firm against the dajjaal.' When the Saddaqat from that tribe came, the Messenger of Allah, Sallahu Alayhi wa Sallam said, "These are charitable gifts of our folk." aa'isha had a slave girl from that tribe, and the Prophet Sallallaahu Alayhi wa Sallam said to Aa'ishah, manumit her as she is decendant of Isma'eel, alayhis Salaam." Hadith no. 2543, book 49 Manumission of Slaves , (13)Chapter: Whoever possessed Arab slaves. 4366 of Al Fath. Ibn Hajr al Asqalani said, This hadith clear mentions of excellence, and superiority of Bani Tameem." (fath 5/217) Hadith of ikrama from one of the companions reported in the Musnad of Imam Ahmad, "Do not say of Bani Tamim anything but good, for indeed they are the severest of people in attacking the Dajjaal." Al Haythamee says : its narrators are sahih." Mujma 10/48 chpt : What is reported on banu Tamim. Is it not strange that those who are severe on Dajjaal, (who are our Saudi Salafi scholars in modern day) are required to have firm belief and proper knowledge -. (yet people of the sufi and she'a grave worship & bidah gone way of Quran 9 :31 preists and rabbis attack them) By slandering ibn Abdul Wahab, they slander the Sunnah he revived and the companions Radiyallahu anhum who praised his virtuous tribe who carries his dawa today - against the teachings of the Sunna as he is sever on dajjal, this shows ahlul bida, etc. are wrong on this too! Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab revived the Aqidah of Al - Islam and Sahih Sunnah, when people who worshipping the graves of the companions, Radiyallalhu anhum. (like christians do to their saints) Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 3261 - Umar ibn al-Khattab reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Do not exaggerate my praises as the Christians have done with the son of Mary. Verily, I am only a servant, so refer to me as the servant of Allah and his messenger.” Sufyan ath Thawri may Allah have mercy on him said, "Bida is more beloved to Iblees, than sins. This is because sins are repented from while bida are not repented from."
Narrated Ibn `Umar: The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "O Allah! Bestow Your blessings on our Sham! O Allah! Bestow Your blessings on our Yemen." The People said, "And also on our Najd." He said, "O Allah! Bestow Your blessings on our Sham (north)! O Allah! Bestow Your blessings on our Yemen." The people said, "O Allah's Apostle! And also on our Najd." I think the third time the Prophet (ﷺ) said, "There (in Najd) is the place of earthquakes and afflictions and from there comes out the side of the head of Satan." Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab was a religious leader and theologian from Najd in central arabia who founded the movement now called wahhabism.
The Stranger his Arabic is better than that khabeeth jahil Abu Khadeeja and milk shaykh Abu Iyaad. Both who neither know Arabic and haven’t studied beyond basic mutoon. Yet he’s a ‘shaykh’ to you brain dead waste papers! 🤦🏽
@@sp-files82 Where did i say Abu Khadeejah was a 'Shaykh ' - i don't even classify him to be student of knowledge let alone being shaykh you need not stop making false accusations without proof- just because if a brother critises Hajji doesn't automatically make him a 'Madkhali'- All praises due to Allah we take our knowledge from the Ulama of Madeenah.
@Hasan Arif قال شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية رحمه الله: "ولهذا استقر رأي أهل السنة على ترك القتال في الفتنة، للأحاديث الصحيحة الثابتة عن النبي - صلى الله عليه وسلم - وصاروا يذكرون هذا في عقائدهم، ويأمرون بالصبر على جور الأئمة وترك قتالهم." -(منهاج السنة) (2/241)
fools like bro kariji who not only has been caught lying on books but also supported Hussain's error when the shias lied to him and killed him, he is kawarij sister of shia... just as shia today use kawarij for aid behind the scenes.
Yesterday I’ve seen a video where a particular person quoted a famous scholar in the comment section. I don’t know whether the quote is correct but it stated that saying a word against the ruler makes someone a Kharijey. Well, I know this mindset and Manhaj for several years now. But I recognized two particular things when I read this quote. 1. Many people calling themselves Salafiyya don’t quote scholars of the Salaf. But they most of the time quote a recently died scholar or someone who is still alive like the person who quoted in his comment a famous scholar who is still alive. 2. This quote forces us to call Sahaba a Tabeen Khawarij. The prophet called the speech of a word of right in front of a transgressive ruler as the greatest Jehaad. According to THEIR claim we would logically say they claim indirectly that the prophet called an act that makes someone a Kharijey the greates Jehaad. But the prophet described the Khawarij people as hell hounds. But the greatest Jehaad is a way to paradise. So, does it mean that the one obeying the prophet in this becomes a hell hound entering paradise. Well of course not. The statement of the prophet is revelation and the statement that the one who obeys the prophet in this becomes a Kharijey is not revelation but rather an invention of people who did not learn from the Salaf well enough or is simply a liar 🤥.
May Allah bless you Akhi, I think you have got the wrong idea. Brother the Salaf had Ijma (consensus) that the one who believes in rebelling against the Muslims ruler is not from Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama'ah. This is clear cut without a shadow of a doubt. Read Usool Us Sunnah of Imam Ahmad, Sharh Us Sunnah of Imam Barbaharee, Manhujus Sunnah An Nawiyyah by Shaykhul Islam Ibn Taymiyyah and I can continue listing for days Akhi. The Hadith you mentioned there is no doubt about it but we can see how the other Hadith explain that “Whoever intends to advise one with authority, he should not do so publicly. Rather, he should take him by the hand and advise him in private. If he accepts the advice, all is well. If he does not accept it, he has fulfilled his duty.” Source: Musnad Aḥmad 14909 (Grade Sahih) Likewise the many, many ahadith that prohibit rebellion against the Muslim Ruler (e.g Ibn Hibbān in his Sahīh, no. 4562, authenticated by al-Albānī. Nasa'i 4206. Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1847.Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1855.Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1854. Tiemidhi 1707)
And the Sahabah and the Tabi'een are free from the Khawarij, Wa'audhubillah! Akhi, the above rulings only apply to MUSLIM rulers in the case of some (Key word is SOME) of the Salaf rebelling, this was because they differed on whether Hajjaj ibn Yusuf was a kaffir or not. The majority held the opinion he was still muslim a minority believed he was not nd rebelled - this does not make them Khawarij. As for the likes of Hajji, he is the worst type of Khariji (as mentioned by one of the scholars Ibn Jawzi or Ibn Qayyim) the one who calls people to rebellion whilst sitting comfortably in his home in birmingham. Look at the Muslim countries today! How was Syria before they rebelled against Bashar and how is it now?! How was Libya under Gadaffi and how is it now?! How was Iraq under Saddam and how is it now?! Wallahi, our brothers and sisters are getting slaughtered like cattle every, humiliated, in Libya even enslaved. Ahlus Sunnah do not condone the oppression or the evil of Bashar, Gadaffi or Saddam and their likes but unlike these Khawarij we love the muslims and prefer to see them living in at least a peaceful, stable society where kids can go to school. We obey the commandment of the Messenger of Allah so we hear and Obey the ruler even if he opresses us by illegally taking our wealth and whips our backs (as per the hadith)
@@mohuss1804 Look man. I guess you got the wrong idea. Obviously the Salaf are talking about Muslim rulers in a legitimate state. Then I did not say you should go out on the ruler. But actually the Sahabah and their students did not have an Ijma‘. The Ijma‘ came afterwards. And it is not far fetched that the Ijma‘ was influenced by historical events or rather the consequences of rebellion against the ruler. And we have to be fair. If the Ijma‘ came afterwards it cannot be considered absolute because it cannot be applied to the people before the Ijma‘ or rather the Salaf. To say that someone is not upon the Salaf if he goes out on the ruler is insane. Because there Sahaba and students of them themselves who have gone out against the ruler. Obviously Mu‘āwiyya did fight Ali the Khalifah and disobeyed him. You could say this was wrong. But could you say he is not upon the Salaf. That’s ridiculous. And there are restrictions to the prohibition of rebellion against the ruler. If the ruler changes the religion of Allah he lost his legitimacy. The first step is giving advice. First of all privately then publicly and then disputing authority. All that in case the people can do that without suffering great harm from the ruler. Today we have ruler who change the religion by force and they aid the Kuffar against Muslims. If nothing is said publicly and nothing is done than the people will eventually fall into Kufr. Look, you can’t use one part of the Sunnah and leave the other. Use the whole Sunnah and learn what attributes should the ruler have not to fall under the kind of rulers whom are not allowed to be rebelled against. And look up if all that is applicable to nowadays rulers because nowadays is what interests us. Another thing. I do not promote rebellion against the ruler even if does not have legitimacy when the consequences are worse than the situation before rebellion. I do not say people should go to the streets if that leads to massacres and rape of women and so on and so forth. In that particular case it could also be Haram to go out than because of the great evil that follows. But we could only say that if the great evil is more likely to happen than relief and stability. That all in case the ruler does not have legitimacy to rule as actually most states if not all because of changing the religion and aiding Kuffar. The hadiths all of them apply to rulers who apply the prayer and take the Zakat and expand the Islamic borders and apply the Hudud. But it’s not the case today. So my objection to rebellion today has only to do with Fasād and harm and the better among to choices. We could talk all along but it’s a huge thing.
Advice by the way cannot be made privately if you cannot contact the ruler or the person of authority or the person in charge or whatsoever. And if the ruler or anyone has done something publicly which is wrong the advice comes publicly if there’s no other option which is nowadays almost always the case.
@Yonis Ali i wrote another comment explaining the affair of the Salaf but it did not appear for some reason therefore calm down before u call someone ignorant and go read the books of the Salaf first. The Salaf are free from the Khawarij no doubt! Now all the points above were about the impermissibility of rebelling against the MUSLIM ruler, as for a minority of the Salaf rebelling against Hajjaj ibn Yusuf was because they believed Al Hajjaj fell into major kufr whereas the majority of the Salaf believed he was still Muslim. As you can see they disputed if the leader was a kaffir NOT if rebellion was permissible.
This was not an interview. This was a lesson ! Amazing ! And this was just a taster from the looks of it! Can’t believe what I just heard.. and shocking what’s being brushed under the carpet for years ! Lol sunnnnnni! Islam! 😆
Assalamualaikum, Has Tareeq Najd been published in English or urdu? Are there any other books on this subject in those languages? Please let me know. Jazakallah khair
What hajji is not mentioning is that the Muslims can only overthrow a ruler who commits Kufr Buwa (open kufr as clear as night and day) when they have the ABILITY! And as Shaykh ul Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah said that if forbidding an evil leads to MORE evil then forbidding that initial evil becomes HARAM. Remember it is Allaah who grants the kingdom to whom HE wills and dishonours who He wills. The Early Salaf rebelled but the proofs did not reach all of them until later when an IJMA (consensus) was reached amongst the scholars of the Salaf that rebellion khurooj was haram. BUT as our present ulama say that if khurooj already took place and fighting erupts then you fight until the word of Allaah (Tawheed) is UPPERMOST. The Hadith of flogging of the ruler and hearing and obeying him is to prevent more vices in society and this IMAM who flogs is RULING by the Shari’ah.
So when the Madhi comes to put justice on the earth but starts with Saudi, where will these Salafi movements be? Will they say this is wrong to him? Will they side with the rulers of the country?
It's reasonable to presume that some with join the Mahdi and some with join with the Taghut rulers. Presently, KSA is being secularized and liberalized by the monarchy and the West causing massive damage. Salafi movement is severely persecuted with many ulama in prison
The grandchildren of the Prophet Muhammad in the Hijaz and they are on the Salafiyyah The Mahdi will not be an Ash'ari, a Sufi, or a Shiite.. Rather, a Muslim who follows the texts of the Qur'an with the understanding of the family of the Prophet Muhammad in the Hijaz.
@@عبدالله-ن6ه2ص brother, he will be a Muslim, full stop. The Saudi rulers follow they way of the Salafi, which they have decided to create today. Their version. I dont think you get my question brother. The Salafi movement today are there to protect the rulers and scholars who do not agree with their way of doing things are going missing or put in jail. The salaf of the past were muslims. They didnt call their selves Salafi. Do you understand what's going on here? So the Madhi will come and go against the way of the people who call them Salafi today because they do what the ruler tells them, even if its injustice they keep their mouth closed. This is not the way of the Salaf.
@@onepurpose1625 the Sahaba (RAH) were strategic thinkers, visionaries, able to think, adapt, and envision a reality where the Deen of Allah and the Cause of Allah were Supreme. Today's Salafi movements have betrayed the Salaf was Salih. They oppose strategic adaptive thinking, they demand unconditional obedience to Tawaghit rulers like in Egypt, Jordan, KSA, and betrayed the Salafis of Yemen, Iraq, Syria to be destroyed for Saudi national interests and power. KSA betrayals have compounded over the last decades with untold numbers of believers killed, tortured, imprisoned by their hands and words worldwide. The War in Yemen began with KSA betraying Salafis in Dammaj to be killed by the 100s which established the power of Houthis and separated KSA Nationalist forces from Islamic forces, which is what KSA wanted to placate America. Houthis took Sanaa and the palace thereafter.
he brings proof like the shias bring proof... Imam Hussain was fooled by the shias, the kawarij like bro kariji are sisters of shias, using their lies on Hussain as evidence... ok lets keep it simple Hasan did teh opposite of Hussain, was Hasan wrong? You know in Sunni Islam Hasan is more virtuous no?
he brings proof like the shias bring proof... Imam Hussain was fooled by the shias, the kawarij like bro kariji are sisters of shias, using their lies on Hussain as evidence... ok lets keep it simple Hasan did teh opposite of Hussain, was Hasan wrong? You know in Sunni Islam Hasan is more virtuous no?
Part 2 Virtues of Banu Tamim : Bani Tameem constitute the majority of the Najd in Saudi Arabia. Recall Najd just means elevated land.
Ibn Abdul Wahab At Tamimi's tribe in hadiths : Sahih Bukhaaree report of Abu Hurayra, *"I have loved the tribe of Bani Tameem, ever since I heard three things the Messenger of Allah, Sallallahu Alayhi wa Sallam, said about them I heard him saying, these people, would stand firm against the dajjaal.' When the Saddaqat from that tribe came, the Messenger of Allah, Sallahu Alayhi wa Sallam said, "These are charitable gifts of our folk." aa'isha had a slave girl from that tribe, and the Prophet Sallallaahu Alayhi wa Sallam said to Aa'ishah, manumit her as she is decendant of Isma'eel, alayhis Salaam."* Hadith no. 2543, book 49 Manumission of Slaves , (13)Chapter: Whoever possessed Arab slaves. 4366 of Al Fath. Ibn Hajr al Asqalani said, This hadith clear mentions of excellence, and superiority of Bani Tameem." (fath 5/217) Hadith of ikrama from one of the companions reported in the Musnad of Imam Ahmad, *"Do not say of Bani Tamim anything but good, for indeed they are the severest of people in attacking the Dajjaal." Al Haythamee says : its narrators are sahih." Mujma 10/48 chpt : What is reported on banu Tamim.* Is it not strange that those who are severe on Dajjaal, (who are our Saudi Salafi scholars in modern day) are required to have firm belief and proper knowledge -. (yet people of the sufi and she'a grave worship & bidah gone way of Quran 9 :31 preists and rabbis attack them) By slandering ibn Abdul Wahab, they slander the Sunnah he revived and the companions Radiyallahu anhum who praised his virtuous tribe who carries his dawa today - against the teachings of the Sunna as he is sever on dajjal, this shows ahlul bida, etc. are wrong on this too! Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab revived the Aqidah of Al - Islam and Sahih Sunnah, when people who worshipping the graves of the companions, Radiyallalhu anhum. (like christians do to their saints) *Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 3261 - Umar ibn al-Khattab reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Do not exaggerate my praises as the Christians have done with the son of Mary. Verily, I am only a servant, so refer to me as the servant of Allah and his messenger.”* Sufyan ath Thawri may Allah have mercy on him said, "Bida is more beloved to Iblees, than sins. This is because sins are repented from while bida are not repented from."
Muslim reported in his Sahīh (1847) from Wā’il Ibn Hujr that: Salamah Ibn Yazeed Al-Ju’fee asked Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ): “O Prophet of Allah, what do we do if we have rulers over us who demand their rights yet they withhold our rights?” He replied: “Listen to them and obey them [regardless]. Upon them is their burden and on you will be your burden.”
@Dorus ullah Ibn Abī ‘Āsim reported in As-Sunnah (2/508) from ‘Adiyy Ibn Hātim (may Allah be pleased with him) that we said: “O Messenger of Allah, we do not ask you regarding obedience to the ruler who has taqwā (who is pious and who fears Allah), and is good and rectifies. Rather, we are asking about the ruler who does such-and-such and such-and-such?“ And he mentioned their evil traits. So the Prophet (ﷺ) answered: “Fear Allah! Listen to the ruler and obey him.” (Also reported by At-Tabarāni in Al-Kabīr, 17/101, and authenticated by Al-Albāni in Dhilāl Al-Jannah)
MashaAllah. The knowledge on display here is inspiring and we need more of this as the ummah is struggling. Please can brother Bro Hajji come back on and delve deeper into the conspiracy of the Najd sect and maybe you guys could talk about other topics such as the history of Muslim Spain & the reasons for the decline of the Spanish Muslims, practical things that young British Muslims can do to reconnect to the history of this great religion, managing a COVID world where our children are being attacked from all angles to accept LGBTQ and other issues that affect our community??? This is what is needed as we are lacking direction and there are many many imposters such as Maajid Nawaz out there who are leading the masses to the pits of hell. May Allah protect you brothers, keep you humble and continue to allow you to bring this kind of dialogue to the community. Ameen
Tariq ibn Shihab reported: A man asked the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, “What is the best jihad?” The Prophet said, “A word of truth in front of a tyrannical ruler.” Source: Musnad Aḥmad 18449 Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Nawawi عَنْ طَارِقِ بْنِ شِهَابٍ أَنَّ رَجُلًا سَأَلَ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ أَيُّ الْجِهَادِ أَفْضَلُ قَالَ كَلِمَةُ حَقٍّ عِنْدَ سُلْطَانٍ جَائِرٍ 18449 مسند أحمد مسند العشرة المبشرين بالجنة 117 المحدث النووي خلاصة حكم المحدث إسناده صحيح في تحقيق رياض الصالحين
@@pallyali786 Akhi, fear Allah. There are other ahadith that mention this is not to be done IN PUBLIC but IN PRIVATE! Please do not go down this dangerous, Khariji road. Study all the ahadith about rulers. Save yourself from the Fire 🔥
@@ahmedibnadam5038 brother listen to me. I don't consider these rulers as legitimate rulers of the Muslims. They are Western puppets who are out there to serve the Zionist agenda. They are not my rulers mate. They are not the rulers of the Muslimeen neither are they caliphs. I am not obliged to obey them or boot lick them. The hadeeth is crystal clear. Speaking a word of truth Infront of a tyrant is the pinnacle. Tell your so called rulers to stop sleeping with the Zionist scum.
Dilly will you be fair and bring on someone to respond to Naheem argument or is your podcast only exclusive to rappers and anyone against the ‘madakhila’??
@@MegaMucahid Yes you are right my man. It exposes there kibr and just exposes how shallow they are and how they are sheep who are just blind following. They need to read the following as it's a serious matter. Abdullah ibn Mas’ud reported: The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “No one who has the weight of a seed of arrogance in his heart will enter Paradise.” Someone said, “But a man loves to have beautiful clothes and shoes.” The Prophet said, “Verily, Allah is beautiful and he loves beauty. Arrogance means rejecting the truth and looking down on people.” In another narration, the Prophet said, “No one who has the weight of a seed of faith in his heart will enter Hellfire.” Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 91
I appreciate that brother Dilly support Mohammed it is very kind of him. Because brother Hajji has his followers in RUclips wa lakin it could be more and this one of the ways to spread the real Islam not the way like the Madhalis do it. SubhanAllah as long it is Saudi Arabia everything is mubah but when it comes to meselen Turkey or other Muslim countries I am not talking about sharia ruled countries I mean Muslims then there is no support for them 4 years ago there was the coup attempt in Turkey I heard nothing from Da'wah boy or people like him. The whole Arabia is build on khuruj everybody knows that. They killed Kashoggi brutaly in the embassy this cowards. May Allah give them what they deserve
yep, sadly it really means to them saved from the hell fire, while obviously everyone else is in it(hell)! paradise is exclusively for them, how crazy is that
Zayd رضي الله عنه was martyred in Uyanah and people made a dome over his grave and people started to make tawaf around his grave and make dua to him in his grave. These are the reason the dome over his grave was destroyed and these are the kind of people Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab made takfir of.
@@anique_hussain he levelled the grave according to the hadith of the prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم. He destroyed the dome above the grave not the contents of the grave.
When Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab destroyed the domes over the graves and forbidded the people from worshipping the graves the local tribes opposed him for this and wanted to fight him. These are the kind of people who Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab fought. Your shaykh bro hajji is not giving you the full context. He's trying to make it seem like Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab made takfir on anyone who wasn't with him. It's very simple he made takfir on people who committed shirk and he fought against them and he fought against those allies of the arab pagans and against those who waged war against him and his dawah.
”there is no unity with these people” it couldnt be truer..... i always said the first thing to do if we want unity and khilafa back is to push them the farthest....... and no khilafa will ever stand as long as these still have a single word in the discussion
The part of the hadith where it states, "even if he (the ruler) lashes your back and takes your wealth," has been declared as a weak addition to the hadith
Weakness of Hadîth: “You listen to and obey the leader, even if he beats your back and takes your wealth.” By Haytham Sayfaddîn - Part 1: Imâm Muslim narrated this saying: And Muhammad Ibn Sahl Ibn ‘Askar at-Tamîmî told me: Yahyâ Ibn Hassân told us: *Hâ’: And ‘Abdullâh Ibn ‘Abdir-Rahmân ad-Dârimî told us: Yahyâ, and he is Ibn Hassân told us: Mu’âwiyah, and he is Ibn Salâm, told us: On the authority of Abû Sallâm who said: Huthayfah Ibn al-Yamân said: However, he narrated it within the **Mutâba’ât, not in the Usûl. Imâm ad-Dâraqutnî stated: “And Muslim narrated the Hadîth of Mu’âwiyah Ibn Salâm on the authority of Zayd on the authority of Abû Sallâm on the authority of Huthayfah…And this, in my opinion, is Mursal; Abû Sallâm did not hear from Huthayfah, nor from his peers who went to ‘Irâq. (This is) because Huthayfah passed away (just) nights after the murder of ‘Uthmân, رضي الله عنه. And in it, it contains ‘Huthayfah said’, so this indicates that it is ‘Mursal.’” “Al-Ilzâmât wat-Tatabbu’”, (pg. 181-182). In other words, he did not say he heard it from Huthayfah. And Imâm An-Nawawî stated: “Ad-Dâraqutnî stated: ‘This, in my opinion, is ‘Mursal.’’ And it is as Ad-Dâraqutnî said.” “Al-Minhâj Sharh Sahîh Muslim Ibn al-Hajjâj”, Vol. 12/237 Al-Wâdi’î stated: “In this Hadîth of Huthayfah, there is an addition which is not in the Hadîth of Huthayfah which is agreed upon, and it is his statement: ‘And even if he beats your back and takes your wealth.’ So this addition is weak, because it is from this severed path.” “Al-Ilzâmât Wat-Tatabbu’”, pg. 182 Ibn Hajar stated: “And he narrated in ‘Mursal’ form from Huthayfah, Abû Tharr and others.” “Tahthîb at-Tahthîb”, Vol. 10/296 So in and of itself, we see that this narration is weak. Next, we will discuss the narrations used to attempt to strengthen this weak narration. And this is the opinion of Shaykh Sulaymân Ibn Nâsir al-‘Alwân and Abdul-‘Azîz Ibn Marzûq at-Tarîfî. And Allâh Knows Best. Haytham Sayfaddîn ________________________________ *Hâ’: Muhaddithîn place this letter in their chains of transmission when restarting their chain with another of their Shaykhs whom they heard the same Hadîth from. **Mutâba’ât: Secondary narrations narrated by an author after the main narration which meets the standards of their book.
Weakness of Hadîth: “You listen and obey the leader, even if he beats your back and takes your wealth.” - Haytham Sayfaddîn - Part 2: Some have tried to reject this by saying: There is another narration of this Hadîth that isn’t from the path of Abû Sallâm from Huthayfah. They quote: Imâm Ahmad said: Muhammad Ibn Ja’far told us: Shu’bah told us: On the authority of Abut-Tayyâh who said: I heard Sakhr narrating from Subay’ who said:… However, this is weak as well. Sakhr is Sakhr Ibn Badr al-‘Ijlî al-Basrî who is unknown. Likewise, Subay’ is Subay’ Ibn Khâlid al-Yashkarî al-Basrî. He was only declared trustworthy by Al-‘Ijlî and Ibn Hibbân. And being declared trustworthy by them is not enough to make someone a reliable narrator, and more particularly, it is not enough for a Hadîth of this nature to be accepted. This is because it contradicts a Hadîth narrated by those who are more acceptable. Likewise, it was narrated by Nasr Ibn ‘Âsim on the authority of Subay’ Ibn Khâlid. Narrated by Ahmad Ibn Hanbal. Furthermore, it was narrated by ‘Alî Ibn Zayd on the authority of Subay’ Ibn Khâlid. Narrated by Ahmad. However, ‘Alî Ibn Zayd is weak. He was weakened by Yahyâ Ibn Sa’îd al-Qattân, Abû Ahmad al-Hâkim, Yahyâ Ibn Ma’în, Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, Abû Hâtim ar-Râzî, An-Nasâ’î, Ibn Hibbân, Abû Zur’ah ar-Râzî, Alî Ibn al-Madînî, Ibn Khuzaymah and many others. And in place of Abû Sallâm from Huthayfah there is Zayd Ibn Wahb. Narrated by Ahmad. However, this is a mistake from those reading “Musnad Ahmad” in believing that this chain was related to this Hadîth. In reality, this chain relates to a separate Hadîth about trustworthiness being removed from people. This was pointed out by the Muhaddith ‘Abdur-Rahmân al-Faqîh. So we see that this is not actually a supporting narration for this Hadîth. In short, we see that the narration of Al-Bukhârî and the main narration of Muslim does not contain this phrase. And the narrations used to support it are either mistakes that don’t actually say this, weak narrations or, at best, not as strong as the narration that does not contain it. And Allâh Knows Best. Haytham Sayfaddîn
@Mr. EA this isn't copying and pasting from a random website. This is copied directly from author of the article. Don't come and divert from the topic by asking me about my level of arabic. I just posted evidence to show the the statement, "even if he beats your back and takes your wealth," is weak and also the other evidence that people try to use to strengthen is also weak.
@Mr. EA ok present the other chains of transmission that strengthens it? Part 2 of the thing that i posted proves that all other chains of transmission are weak
When Shaykh Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab conquered the land of the tribes that were fighting against him for his dawah to tawheed, he replaced the tribal laws and customs with the Shariah
@Dorus ullah I think it's a bad misconception that his books were "good". They were extremely basic, with no nuance, and nothing of great substance. Basically like elementary school level stuff
@Dorus ullah I know people speak about it today as if it's some amazing book, but really it's just the social media Muslims and the loud aggressive sect
Right, this issue about rulers. 1. The ahadith that say we should obey the ruler even if he is unjust applies when the Muslims don't have the ability to remove him by force. Removing by force means without a worse fitna coming about,, and having the capability to do it. 2. There is also the issue of speaking out against the ruler, which is allowed, of course. If we don't speak up, how will people know? Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal rahimahullah said that if you remain silent when there is evil, then the evil will spread. 3. The obedience also applies if the ruler outwardly rules by Shariah. For example, a ruler could rule by shariah outwardly, but he stole someones wealth secretly. Even in that context he would have to be obeyed in that which is halal. 4. Why did the people of the past rebel against rulers then? Why did Ibn Taymiya fight against the Tarters then? And there are many examples. There's a good explanation of this in Maudoodi's tafsir.
Ohoo muhammad bin Salman messed up everything for salafis . 😅😅😅😅😅🤣🤣🤣 . It is Muhammad bin Salman who revealed this salafi movement by this rebellious action . The more he rebells , the more salafi movement will be revealed . 😅🤣🤣🤣🤣😅😅😅😅😅😅
Question: What is the ruling on demonstrations? What are the evidences for its permissibility? And what are the evidences for its prohibition? Answer: The issue of demonstration is a long one, and I will summarize my words regarding it by saying: Some of the brothers that said that demonstrations are permissible researched in the Sunnah after evidences for this, so they mentioned for example the famous hadeeth of Abu Hurayrah regarding the neighbor[1], something which is these days referred to as "rousing the public opinion", the source for this hadeeth is in Sunan Abi Dawud. And also they use the hadeeth of Abdullah bin Iyas bin Abi Dhubaba where women complained (in front of the Prophet (ﷺ)) regarding their husbands (i.e. a female demonstration)[2], and this is also narrated in Sunan Abi Dawud. But all of this isn't necessary (to prove it's permissibility), because the rule is: "Nothing is legislated in this Religion except what Allah has legislated, and nothing becomes forbidden except what Allah has forbidden." So the rule is regarding worship ('ibadah) is that of tawqif (i.e. not permissible to exceed beyond), so there's a must to provide an evidence for it. And the rule regarding customary things ('adaat) is that they are in general permissible. So whoever forbids something is asked to provide an evidence (daleel) for it, this is the fundamental rule (asl) regarding this. So whoever permitted demonstrations and holds to this fundamental rule, then he is of no need to bring forth any evidences, because nothing is haram except what Allah has made haram. And even if one brought forth evidences to prove this, then it's being generous. So what's left for us is to see what those that forbid demonstrations have for evidence, then afterwards we can answer them and let the issue be finished (over with). The most famous evidences that they have are three: That it is an innovation (bid'ah), that it is imitating the disbelievers, that it is forbidden as a means to block an evil (sad al-dhara'i) which leads corruptions (fasad). 1) With regards to their argument that it's a bid'ah, then this is false (batil). Because bid'ah is in matters pertaining to worship ('ibadah), not customary things ('adaat). And thus there isn't any need for redundancy of words to show that this argument is void. 2) With regards to their argument that is imitating the disbelievers, then this is also false. For history is filled with people gathering and marching and demanding something. And go back to the history of Uthman (رضي الله عنه) and go back to the history of al-Basrah and al-Kufa in the latter half of the first century (hijri), and see how plentiful these sort of demonstrations were. This isn't to prove that its something legislated or permissible, rather it is evidence that it isn't from the issues of imitating the disbelievers. 3) And regarding their argument that its something that leads to corruption (fasad), then this is not correct. Because we see it taking place everywhere and there is no corruption that takes place like which they claim will come about. Rather great benefits (masalih 'adhimah) have come through it, like the overthrowing of the Egyptian taghut (i.e. Mubarak). And his overthrowing - even though it didn't bring forth a Islamic governance - eased the injustice and tyranny, and it brought forth some justice that weren't there during his (i.e. Mubarak) time. This is a quick summary regarding this issue, and Allah knows best. ___________________________________________________________ The source for the Fatwa is Fatawa al-Ha'iriyyah, a compilation of fatawa by the Shaykh from inside the prison of al-Ha'ir, KSA. [1] Full hadeeth: Abu Hurayra said, "A man said, 'Messenger of Allah, I have a neighbour who does me harm.' He said, 'Go and take your things out into the road.' He took his things out into the road. People gathered around him and asked, 'What's the matter?' He replied, 'A neighbour of mine injures me and I mentioned it to the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace. He told me, "Take your things out into the road."' They began to say, 'O Allah, curse him! O Allah, disgrace him!' When the man heard that, he came out to him and said, 'Go back to your home. By Allah, I will not harm you.'" sunnah.com/adab/6/24 [2] Full hadeeth: Iyas bin 'Abdullah (May Allah be pleased with him) reported: Messenger of Allah said, "Do not beat Allah's bondwomen." When 'Umar (May Allah be pleased with him) came to Messenger of Allah and complained saying: "The women have become very daring towards their husbands," He gave permission to beat them. Then many women went to the family of the Messenger of Allah (wives) complaining of their husbands, and he (the Prophet) said, "Many women have gone round Muhammad's family complaining of their husbands. Those who do so, that is, those who take to beating their wives, are not the best among you".
@Ibrahim Ibn Mahmud Bro Hajji in the video addresses his attitude. Did you watch it? In your video he apologises publicly. For raw insults like mentioning being on drugs or pusillanimous. But calling someone ignorant does not fall into that. Bro Hajji called Dawahboy an Ikhwani as he was using the same rules as him... It showed Dawahboy's double standards. But of course you wouldnt show the context.
@Ibrahim Ibn Mahmud Did you watch this podcast where he addresses it ?? Your quote does not fit this situation btw. its not like Bro Hajji has only insulted him? yes, that isnt right and (again he's apologised) but Bro Hajji has filled his videos with references (full references, Imran was caught by Bro Hajji to only use parts of references (cant remember which video)). And you;re defending Dawahboy? Are you going to make a video about him insulting others by calling them innovators, ikhwani, etc?? Or does that not fit your agenda?
@Ibrahim Ibn Mahmud Lol first of all.. I've never met Bro Hajji for him to be my teacher. 2nd with your list of teachers is clear to see your ilk. 3rd - Bro Hajji gave evidences for everything he said. He also said he does not think muslim should rebel but you have to respect the difference of opinion. your teachers are now making videos about Bro Hajji mispronunciation instead of addressing the issue... do us a favour and tell them to drop their arrogance and just accept there is a legit difference of opinion. 4th - "Making a video on dawah man doing the same thing would be very hard, as I wouldn't have much content to work with" Are you serious? This guy has been making video for how long? It does not fit your agenda for you to make a video about dawahboy that is why you wont do it. You talk about Bro Hajji's attitude (which again he addressed AND I said is wrong above)... but Dawahboy literally has an attitude problem... he calls people innovators and Khariji without hesitation.
@Dorus ullah first of all it's you're, not "your". And you've proven yourself to be a deviant by declaring me to be upon shirk (which is a lie), with zero evidence to back up your false claim. You are a fool, and a deviant, wait for the day of youm ul qiyamah, where your slander and false charges against me will be used against you, wait and see.
@Dorus ullah No it isn't you're an idiot and a fool who has got himself in colossal trouble. Get ready to defend your false and slanderous accusation on youm ul qiyamah.
@@AF-xp2yb You must be smoking crack if you're about to declare anywhere from 100-200 million people "murtadeen". And just ftr, Ibn Taymiyyah WAS a sufi. You and your ilk and in the minority.
Please stop this disgusting name calling. The rest of the content was good, but calling Muslims waste papers etc. changes the dynamic of the conversation.
I know refutation has its place in Islam, but i feel its taken over the modern day version of islam, its sad to see brothers have come to this, its almost like rap battles, some are just refuting to make themselves relevant.
@Yonis Ali My original point was about our own brothers arguing amongst themselves, its sad to see. So whats Christians or other religions got to do with this, thats a different topic altogether. Refutation should be done in private, not plastered all over RUclips with funny thumbnails, its now become tit for tat
As salaamu alaykum brothers, sisters, friends and foes.
Please like, share and comment on this video, as well as subscribing to the 5Pillars RUclips channel!
Jazakallah khayran.
may allah reward yoy guys best youtube channel and best podcasts MashaAllah
Salams. Brilliant video. I was wondering if your could kindly add timestamps into the view for more ease with viewing. Thank you
Anonymous Brother not everyone who rebels is a Khariji, as those who rebel are of different categories, as for Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab rahimahullah he is not infallible and he was wrong on things and he made mistakes and he is open to criticism just like any other Scholar.
@Anonymous Brother Did you even watch the video? This comment shows a lot because you clearly took nothing away from the video. He addressed all these points you mention.
biggie k Jazakallah Khayran brother and ameen to your dua!
I didn't knew much about this bro Hajji, only things here and there, but my God that was intense.
Much needed !
I'm grateful to you Dilly and Hajji
May Allah heal the ummah and unify our hearts
@Ibrahim Ibn Mahmud You seem to be the only one here who understands things that way
@Abbas Abdullah is there content preserved somewhere on a different site?
So are you ready to rebel and fight the rulers brother ✊
This free content is real life motivation and inspiration. Please dont stop Mr Dilly, I benefit so much from these videoes and enjoy them so much.
What iv never understood about these ppl on the Salafi movement is that they will openly refute Muslim brothers who are trying their best to do good but they would never refute tyrants leaders and ppl who cause oppression on Muslims in Muslim countries. I find it a contradiction.
Watch this brother with proofs why
ruclips.net/video/jNBZrwy8Xrw/видео.html
There will appear after me rulers, they will not guide by my guidance, and they will not establish my Sunnah; there will be amongst them men whose hearts will be hearts of devils in the bodies of men!” He was asked: “How should I behave, O Messenger of Allāh, if I reach that time?” He replied: “Hear and obey the Amīr (i.e. the ruler), even if he beats your back and [illegally] takes your wealth - hear and obey!
Sahih Muslim
Brothers who have not studied and are misguiding people because they have no correct or authentic knowledge. It is obligatory to clarify the doubts that these ignorant muslim brothers bring so they do not misguide people - Refutation is how our deen is preserved! Stopping us from becoming like d Christians and Jews.
As for the oppressive rulers they are oppressing them in the life of this world and their judgement is with allah but they are not misguiding the people in their deen unlike these so called ignorant Da'ees like Hajji above.
Tariq ibn Shihab reported: A man asked the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, “What is the best jihad?” The Prophet said, “A word of truth in front of a tyrannical ruler.”
Source: Musnad Aḥmad 18449
Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Nawawi
عَنْ طَارِقِ بْنِ شِهَابٍ أَنَّ رَجُلًا سَأَلَ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ أَيُّ الْجِهَادِ أَفْضَلُ قَالَ كَلِمَةُ حَقٍّ عِنْدَ سُلْطَانٍ جَائِرٍ
18449 مسند أحمد مسند العشرة المبشرين بالجنة
117 المحدث النووي خلاصة حكم المحدث إسناده صحيح في تحقيق رياض الصالحين
Wats the difference between a oppressive ruler vs tyrant ruler ?????
And was yazid nd muawiya tyrants or oppressive???
@@hassan333wa Muawiyyah is a Companion of the Messenger of Allah and is in Paradise as Allah and his Messenger promised, he was not a tyrant. Rather he was seeking justice for his cousin Uthman ibn Affan and made ijtihaad
I often come back to this episode. I'm learning a lot, a lot of history (which I love) and politics and common sense! Backed by islamic proofs! Also very relevant right now
They made a big mistake here on Islamic proofs to say the least.
1) **Part 4 - Bro Hajji - Obeying the Ruler - Sunnah or..**
2) **Bro Hajji Part 5: Misquoting Al-Mualimi**
3) **Bro Hajji And The Straw That Broke The...**
all three are by thorn in the throats, I don't agree with them in all situations.
NasirAlHanbali also has good videos on this.
I could listen for another couple hours wallahi. May Allah(swt) bless you both.
you mean bro kariji who pushes kawarij views on hussain supporting the shia deception and murder to him? shame!
They made a big mistake here.
1) **Part 4 - Bro Hajji - Obeying the Ruler - Sunnah or..**
2) **Bro Hajji Part 5: Misquoting Al-Mualimi**
3) **Bro Hajji And The Straw That Broke The...**
all three are by thorn in the throats,
bro came back 2 years later to spew his nonsense @@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543
These madakhila never fooled me for one second; even before I heard from others, I had these same arguments against them. Anyone with a sound mind and reason can easily disrupt their weak claims.
Anyone with a sound Fitrah/sound mind can see through their Satanic deception, its clear the madakhila are upon falsehood and are clearly an overzealous cult.
Your Loss
@@Fatima_33 Define Madkhali?
@hxzzz a where did you get that definition from? Have read lots of Books and I didn't come across that Tittle.
@@khaldancarlos9859 What is the definition then?
What a podcast! Loved every minute of it. JazakAllah for not censoring anything. This needs to be heard!
you mean bro kariji who pushes kawarij views on hussain supporting the shia deception and murder to him? who lies on books and slanders Muslims and pushes war! shame!
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 he never called for khorooj how is he khariji? Subhanullah you make takfir on him so easy, intresting 🤔
@Ibrahim Ibn Mahmud There is no need to lie. If you can find disgusting manners of Hajji then you can surely find his statements where he said he doesn't advocate for Khrooj but that he is against Shamsi and co and their labelling of everyone who does khrooj as Khariji.
@Ibrahim Ibn Mahmud You are free to believe whatever you like. But when it comes to the claims, unless you have contrary evidence to his words that he doesn't call for khrooj, you have only a claim and no evidence.
Regarding his frequent videos on khrooj is due to Shamsi who approached him 1st and dawah man who made video against him 1st.
If I take the statement of Ibn Abd al Barr as face value and the way you quoted then major Sahaba and Salaf are considered Khwarij including Hussein RA, Zubair RA and others.
If you believe they are khwarij then you have no business being a Muslim, and If you believe they are not Khwarij then your evidence falls flat on its face and doesn't represent the reality properly.
Don't disrespect Sahaba or you will be asked about it on the day of jydgement.
@Ibrahim Ibn Mahmud You do know that there are hadiths that support rebellion.
There are also salaf who took part in rebellion and there are statements that don't claim everyone who did khrooj is khariji.
Selective ahadith and selective quotation posting is not gonna help your case since possibility of rebellion and rebellion being not haram is also present is ahadith books.
I guess you also believe that just like Hussein RA, no person from salaf ever rebelled.
Here are some ahadiths who show the possibility of rebellion and it being not haram in all cases.
Al-Bukhari narrated on the authority of Junada b. abi Umayyah who said: We went to ‘Ubadah b. as-Samit when he was sick and we said: May Allah (swt) guide you. Inform us of a Hadith from the Messenger of Allah (saw) so Allah may benefit you from it. He said, the Messenger of Allah (saw) called upon us and we gave him the Bai’ah, and he said, of that which he had taken from us, that we should give him the pledge to listen and obey, in what we like and dislike, in our hardship and ease, and that we should not dispute the authority of its people unless we saw open Kufr (kufr buwah) upon which we had a proof (burhan) from Allah.
The hadith was reported by At-Tabarani as “kufran Surahan (open kufr)”, and as “unless the disobedience of Allah is bawahan”. It was also reported by Ahmad as “unless they order you of ithmin bawahan (open sin)”.
Awf Ibnu Malik Al-Ashja'i said: "I heard the Messenger of Allah (SAW) say: 'The best of your Imams are those whom you love and they love you and whom you pray for and they pray for you, and the worst of your Imams are those whom you hate and they hate you and you curse them and they curse you.' We asked: 'O Messenger of Allah, shall we not then declare war on them?' He said: 'No, as long as they establish the prayer among you', [Muslim]
Muslim reported on the authority of Umm Salama that the Messenger of Allah (SAW) said: "Ameers will be appointed over you, you recognise some of what they do and you disown some. Whoever recognised he is absolved from blame. Whoever disapproved (of their bad deeds) he is safe, but whoever consented and followed them (he is doomed.)" They said: "Should we not fight against them?" He (SAW) replied: "No, as long as they prayed."
What is meant by establishing the prayer is to rule by Islam, that is to implement the rules of Shari'ah . This is because the whole of Islam is denoted here by naming part of it. This is common in Arabic, for instance Allah (SWT) says: "To free a neck" [4:92] which means to free the slave i.e. all of him and not just his neck. In this Hadith he (SAW) said: "As long as they establish the prayer among you." This means the establishment of all the rules not just the prayer and is a figurative form (kinayah) where basically the part is mentioned to refer to the whole.
If you want I can post some views of different scholars as well.
*Now you have a problem.*
*You say rebellion is prohibited but salaf rebelled.*
*You say rebellion is from Khwarij but salaf rebelled.*
*You say there are ahadiths prohibiting rebellion but there are ahadiths which support it on conditions.*
*You say scholars prohibit rebellion but there are major scholars who say in some cases it become obligatory and not a sin.*
*The problem is for you and not for me because I don't claim rebellion is prohibited in every case.*
At 1:07:13 interestingly, when the Uthmaniyyah (Ottomans) defeated the Mamluks in Egypt, the Ottomans allowed the Mamluks to remain and rule Egypt but gave them more efficient administrative techniques. The mamluks remained until the french Napoleon came to Egypt. Both the Ottomans and the Mamluks dealt with Napoleon. So the Ottomans never wiped out the Mamluks but worked along them after defeating them.
Bro Hajj
Salaam from America. Keep your foot on their necks and don’t let them up. Keep going brother!
True colors
@@abubeast8816 LMFAOOOOOOOO
But he's weak and doesn't have strong refutations.
He's taking advantage of his audience not being able to read Arabic and history for themselves.
@@huntsman2877 did you even listen ? He refuted many of the lies that they spread. Even cited books written by salafis.
@@Shiroyashasama as I said, you can't read Arabic and that's how he makes you think he refutes.
This style of podcast was very needed dilly.
May Allah SWT bless you with your efforts Akhi. May Allah preserve you Brother Hamza, Brother Hijab, Brother Haji and the rest. We need these podcasts in our native languages somehow. By Allah many muslims in our native countries like Pakistan Bangladesh are either lost, ignorant or have veils over their hearts. Shame that us living in Dar Ul Kuffr have much more islamic clarity then those living in Muslim majority countries. Many people's hearts are dead in our native countries. This is a issue that needs highlighting
Dam!! What a podcast mashallah! Hajji bro may Allah preserve you habibi!!! Much love to Dilly too for getting this together.
you mean bro kariji who pushes kawarij views on hussain supporting the shia deception and murder to him? who lies on books and slanders Muslims and pushes war! shame!
@Ibrahim Ibn Mahmud Your point! He repeatedly apologised and besides, this behaviour is warranted because he has to deal with idiots who have IQ levels similar to room temperature or worse
@Ibrahim Ibn Mahmud oh STFU! You haven’t read a single Hadith with its proper context ever in your life now have you? If you are in front of me I’ll make you eat your own words mate! Now you are making me swear and that’s because of your own stupidity and not my fault! When we swear, it’s because of the nature of the stupidity coming from the other side ;otherwise maintaining good conduct and decorum is always the preferred method 100%. For your information, even the companions used to use foul language between themselves during their time! For example: may your mother disown you ثقلت كأمك , ، amongst many other swear / cuss words! They were human beings like us and not so different when we use something similar to this nature in our days and times! At the very least, no F bombs is being thrown around here even though that is warranted with idiots from your ilk! Don’t get religious with me boy, like I said, I will make you eat your own words!
@Ibrahim Ibn Mahmud Dude you need a day job! Too much time on your hands! And before you ask, I am on my lunch break working from home.
@Ibrahim Ibn Mahmud LOL do you hear yourself talk sometimes? Then why bother investing your valuable time here? Like I said, it will be very easy for me to make mincemeat out of your words and make you eat it because you don’t seem to be consistent in following your own advice mate! Think before typing and take this constructive Naseeha from me
This is eye opener. Not many times I watch 2 hours talk this one was great. We love the Great message at the end may Allah bless you all ameen 🤲
same here. subhanAllah. may Allah rectify the affairs of the muslim ummah and reunite us upon pure tawheed.. aameen
A massive thank you to 5pillars for the amazing consistency in delivering top quality podcasts recently. I'm already looking forward to the next one 🙂
i don't think Ottomons did such there , bro kariji is a known liar.
watch :
"Bro Hajji LIES Against the Scholars
"
I listened to you on Mohammed Hijab channel! I am soooooooo happy I found your channel subhanallah very insightful and inspiring. Someone who stands for TRUTH, I absolutely love that. I remember listening to you on Zeeshan podcast long time ago haha! May Allah reward you! Assalam aleykoum
Second time seeing bro Hajji in a video, the dude has a very positive aura about him.
yh maybe its the fact that he is a khariji
Positive 😂😂😂
@@smeshcel3025 It's that easy to call someone a Khariji? Don't you know that that's a trait of the khawaarij? They would label ppl easily, and that's what you just did. You should really look to yourself rather than labelling others.
@@مسلمةالحمدلله-س6ز it is. When u get petrodollars.
@@مسلمةالحمدلله-س6ز well i dont rebel againist muslim leaders or speak aganist them or worst of all call others to fight while im comfy at home. U dont need a astronaut to tell u when u see a rainbow. U dont need a zooligist to tell u what a lion is or isnt. There are things and traits thar are apparent this guy clearly and open is going againist the sunnah of our beloved prophet peace and blessings be upon him. We are muslim and we say it how it is. Omar ibn khata(ra) said "We jugde from the apparent". This whole concept of everybody sweep everybodies open misguidence under the rug is a christin belief and thars what has destroied other nations previous. We speak out against ahlul bida' to perserve this mighty deen not for the pleasure of u or any other person who wants everybody to just group hug. Brother this religion is good advice , and i advice you to read the rules for forbid that which is evio and enjoining what is good. Baraka Allahu feek akhi may Allah guide us all.
Couldn't wait for this one!
Wow Wallahi Deffo the best Podcast since you've started !!! Informative, Passionate Guest and I couldn't take my eyes off it. (On a sidenote all the future podcasts should be around 1.30 hours long).
brother you shouldnt use 786 thats form numerology and from qabalah.
MAshallah Mahallah you took people to school here !! very informative love you bro hajji and well done dilly hussain keep up the good work!
Bro hajji ain't getting his hajj visa anytime soon 🤣 no pun intended
If Allahs wills it, no power in the duniya can stop it..
If they put a height restriction on he’s definitely done for
@sc debates if anyone goes and comes back from the hajj pilgrimage and is desi(from the subcontinent region), they'll give that person the title, hajji, so i'm going to go out on a limb and say, he's already done hajj
@@johnnywalker2723 Are you mocking his height?
@@أبوشغل yes. When you use demeaning terms towards ulema like Sh Rabee and and insult the Sharhus Sunnah of Imam al Barbahaari calling it a talmud, demeaning terms and insults are reciprocated
Masha Allah this was on point. Learnt a lot from this podcast.
This was really good to listen to. Well done Hajji and keep up the good work. Never ever bow down to the tyrants.
are you a revert?
Masha'Allah, brilliant and very information, Bro Hadji seems like he is very fair and just with his views and willing to listen to all views with an open mind which is the total opposite to most Salafis who are seriously single minded and are not willing to listen to or learn any view which is different to theirs.
Shame that most Salafis will not listen to this or Bro Haji, from my personal experience most Salafis want everyone to listen to them but are unwilling to listen to anyone belonging to another group, and they speak ill and call names anyone and everyone who is against their stance and position, Salafis will hate on people who advise them nicely and politely, there is no way they will like or listen to bro Hadji due to him being a bit harsh or impolite towards them, but then again they wouldn't listen to him even if he was polite.
@Abu Masood It is most non madkhali Salafi's also, i have close family who are salafis and hate Madkhalis yet they behave exactly as i have described, i know all Salafi's aint like that but far too many are from my experience.
I dont have issue with Salafi's, actually get on very well with them except for the ones who just like to put you down and attach a label to you only because your not a Salafi, these types of Salafis dont want to really get on with any non Salafi anyway, I've been labelled by Salafis incorrectly many times without them even speaking to me and finding out what i believe.
@Abu Masood strongly disagree to that as its the same story with most Salafi's up and down the country unfortunatly, I've heard the same stories and experiences from countless people from around the UK in regards to their experiences with Salafi's and it almost always the same, and i always think to myself that I've also had identical experiences with Salafi's, and listening to bro hadji hes going through the same experience as i myself and cointless other people have had with Salafi's, im sure its not a coincidence, its as if a large majority of Salafis are Unison in their thinking, behaviour and charactristics, and this is due to the teachings they recive and learn from their teachers. Generally the only people who dont see this issue with Salafi's are Salafi's themselfs, or anyone who has not had much experience with them, they are the most intolerant sect amongst the Muslims that i have ever come across.
Doesn't these guys speak ill of a great dawah imam, Muhammad bin AbdulWahhab?
@@huntsman2877 Not the same at all, Bro Hajji doesn't go all guns blazing, shooting down anyone and everyone who's not part of his group unlike the Salafi's who are always gunning down anyone and everyone (whether Justly or unjustly) who are not part of their group.
@@huntsman2877 ibn abdiwahab’s own brother spoke ill of him and his “dawah”. People criticize his dawah not him.
Jazak Allah Khair for this brothers. It was very informative and educational.
SubhanAllah an insightful discussion. Bro Hajjis arguments are so consistent MashAllaah...
you mean bro kariji who pushes kawarij views on hussain supporting the shia deception and murder to him? who lies on books and slanders Muslims and pushes war! shame!
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 Alhamdulillah bro Hajji is doing a fantastic job,,,.... Any sane logical person can see how is argument is consistent and sound...
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 do you not know about the history of MD ibn and Wahhab and his warmongering history ...it's not the eyes that are blind but the hearts
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 why you mushriks make excuses for idolatry being promoted to the Muslims
@@gkinguk Idolatry? like what? Like sophism & she'uh whose ideas bro cariji pushes & I oppose as a Muslim!
View : **Nasir Hanbali** on bro haji
You Iie & call me mushric? I will reply to you on judgement day for your Iies, esp. If you don't answer.
may Allah bless you both, thankyou for the podcast.
Wow mashaAllah awesome historical discussion! This really questions the sincerity of the salafis if they about Quran and Hadeeth or simply boot lickers!!! Disgraceful acts exposed.
ruclips.net/video/jNBZrwy8Xrw/видео.html
you mean Saudis with Egypt beat israelis in 73.... and shut down the west... while cia backed iran the original jet bombers and took in exiled ql queda who iran and israelis used for war and lie on iraq wmds leading to isis who caused civil war who bro kariji supports... nice stupidity, no wonder kawarij end up with dajjal.
Why did hajji stopped refuting shia and shifted to refute sunnies and ask them to rebel and start wars in their homeland in the name of Islam?
Wish these requests were targeting shia instead.
May Allah reward bro Hajji, for smashing the bootlickers.
Hajji needs to do a talk with Adnan Rashid on history will be very informative.
exactly these sufis are lying all over the place.
@Ibrahim Ibn Mahmud, so saudis are on RIGHT path?
@Ibrahim Ibn Mahmud, so which ground Saudis are standing?
Sunnah or their own will?
Now salafis say no rebelling, then why did Saudi rebel with the help of Britsh(CRISTIANS).
@Ibrahim Ibn Mahmud 🙊🙉🙈
@Ibrahim Ibn Mahmud, not sure why are you so obsessed with Ottomans
*I pray that Allāh guides every single Muslim ruler towards that which is correct and also grants them victory over the disbelievers ameen.*
@Benjamin Zackon your mom and god are
key in depth discussion starts from 32;00 - very interesting points raised.
@Ibrahim Ibn Mahmud get out of here filthy madkhali
@Ibrahim Ibn Mahmud what would you do if a ruler was to come and kill/violate your family?
@Ibrahim Ibn Mahmud As long as you do not support SPUBs or any other offshoots of that madkhali cult then i have no qualms with your viewpoint. Those cults are ruining pure salafi ideology.
Brilliant podcast filled with so much info, historical and textual context. subhanAllah. May Allah bless you both and keep our feet firm upon the truth.. aameen
Massive respect to brother Dilly for this episode, and the rest of their work. if you take guest suggestions, I would strongly suggest an interview with the Saudi dissident @almass3ari. Very few speak as forward as he does when it comes to politics in Islam.
I agree with your analysis of the Najdi dawah, but one thing made me cringe - when Dilly said ‘Rahimahullah’ for Muhammad Ali Pasha. The guy was a slimy and self-serving despot who eventually turned on the Ottomans themselves, and fought them TWICE and brought the Ottomans to the brink of collapse. I expected Brother Dilly to be more well read on Ottoman history, especially since he professes to have teachers in Istanbul.
look at Islam, Virtues of Banu Tamim : Bani Tameem constitute the majority of the Najd in Saudi Arabia. Recall Najd just means elevated land.
Ibn Abdul Wahab At Tamimi's tribe in hadiths :
Sahih Bukhaaree report of Abu Hurayra, "I have loved the tribe of Bani Tameem, ever since I heard three things the Messenger of Allah, Sallallahu Alayhi wa Sallam, said about them I heard him saying, these people, would stand firm against the dajjaal.' When the Saddaqat from that tribe came, the Messenger of Allah, Sallahu Alayhi wa Sallam said, "These are charitable gifts of our folk." aa'isha had a slave girl from that tribe, and the Prophet Sallallaahu Alayhi wa Sallam said to Aa'ishah, manumit her as she is decendant of Isma'eel, alayhis Salaam."
Hadith no. 2543, book 49 Manumission of Slaves
, (13)Chapter: Whoever possessed Arab slaves.
4366 of Al Fath.
Ibn Hajr al Asqalani said, This hadith clear mentions of excellence, and superiority of Bani Tameem." (fath 5/217)
Hadith of ikrama from one of the companions reported in the Musnad of Imam Ahmad, "Do not say of Bani Tamim anything but good, for indeed they are the severest of people in attacking the Dajjaal." Al Haythamee says : its narrators are sahih." Mujma 10/48 chpt : What is reported on banu Tamim.
Is it not strange that those who are severe on Dajjaal, (who are our Saudi Salafi scholars in modern day) are required to have firm belief and proper knowledge -. (yet people of the sufi and she'a grave worship & bidah gone way of Quran 9 :31 preists and rabbis attack them)
By slandering ibn Abdul Wahab, they slander the Sunnah he revived and the companions Radiyallahu anhum who praised his virtuous tribe who carries his dawa today - against the teachings of the Sunna as he is sever on dajjal, this shows ahlul bida, etc. are wrong on this too!
Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab revived the Aqidah of Al - Islam and Sahih Sunnah, when people who worshipping the graves of the companions, Radiyallalhu anhum. (like christians do to their saints)
Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 3261
- Umar ibn al-Khattab reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Do not exaggerate my praises as the Christians have done with the son of Mary. Verily, I am only a servant, so refer to me as the servant of Allah and his messenger.”
Sufyan ath Thawri may Allah have mercy on him said, "Bida is more beloved to Iblees, than sins. This is because sins are repented from while bida are not repented from."
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 these are time specific hadeeth from the time of the Prophet, not relevant to 1200 years later.
Narrated Ibn `Umar:
The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "O Allah! Bestow Your blessings on our Sham! O Allah! Bestow Your blessings on our Yemen." The People said, "And also on our Najd." He said, "O Allah! Bestow Your blessings on our Sham (north)! O Allah! Bestow Your blessings on our Yemen." The people said, "O Allah's Apostle! And also on our Najd." I think the third time the Prophet (ﷺ) said, "There (in Najd) is the place of earthquakes and afflictions and from there comes out the side of the head of Satan."
Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab was a religious leader and theologian from Najd in central arabia who founded the movement now called wahhabism.
His roots and the roots of the Al Saud clan are Judaism. That explains this virus unleashed upon Islam
May Allah bless Bro Hajji and give him tawfeeq to continue exposing the technicalities of the madaakhilah
Muhammed hijab, bro haji, ali dawah, dilly hussain, and hamza zortis. The starting lineup of uks elite dawah team
Suuuuunnni!
"و لا يَخَافونَ لَوْمةَ لآئم" ٥:٥٤
"And they fear not the censure of any censurer" Quran 5:54
No idea who you're referring to. Be clear.
@@user-s8jb3qb6y be clear about what?
Have nothing against Bro. Hajji but where has this brother studied and who are his teachers - he is speaking on very big matters Ma shaa Allah
@Hasan Arif no disrespect brother but do you understand Arabic to even know what an evidence is? Bro. Hajjis arabic isn't very good
The Stranger his Arabic is better than that khabeeth jahil Abu Khadeeja and milk shaykh Abu Iyaad. Both who neither know Arabic and haven’t studied beyond basic mutoon. Yet he’s a ‘shaykh’ to you brain dead waste papers! 🤦🏽
@@sp-files82 Where did i say Abu Khadeejah was a 'Shaykh ' - i don't even classify him to be student of knowledge let alone being shaykh you need not stop making false accusations without proof- just because if a brother critises Hajji doesn't automatically make him a 'Madkhali'- All praises due to Allah we take our knowledge from the Ulama of Madeenah.
@@ACh-km3hx 100% correct.
@Hasan Arif قال شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية رحمه الله:
"ولهذا استقر رأي أهل السنة على ترك القتال في الفتنة، للأحاديث الصحيحة الثابتة عن النبي - صلى الله عليه وسلم - وصاروا يذكرون هذا في عقائدهم، ويأمرون بالصبر على جور الأئمة وترك قتالهم."
-(منهاج السنة) (2/241)
this is probably one of the best videos on youtube
When Bro hajji enters. they know what day it is 💪
fools like bro kariji who not only has been caught lying on books but also supported Hussain's error when the shias lied to him and killed him, he is kawarij sister of shia... just as shia today use kawarij for aid behind the scenes.
I like bro hajjis passion in his videos
Yesterday I’ve seen a video where a particular person quoted a famous scholar in the comment section. I don’t know whether the quote is correct but it stated that saying a word against the ruler makes someone a Kharijey. Well, I know this mindset and Manhaj for several years now. But I recognized two particular things when I read this quote. 1. Many people calling themselves Salafiyya don’t quote scholars of the Salaf. But they most of the time quote a recently died scholar or someone who is still alive like the person who quoted in his comment a famous scholar who is still alive. 2. This quote forces us to call Sahaba a Tabeen Khawarij. The prophet called the speech of a word of right in front of a transgressive ruler as the greatest Jehaad. According to THEIR claim we would logically say they claim indirectly that the prophet called an act that makes someone a Kharijey the greates Jehaad. But the prophet described the Khawarij people as hell hounds. But the greatest Jehaad is a way to paradise. So, does it mean that the one obeying the prophet in this becomes a hell hound entering paradise.
Well of course not. The statement of the prophet is revelation and the statement that the one who obeys the prophet in this becomes a Kharijey is not revelation but rather an invention of people who did not learn from the Salaf well enough or is simply a liar 🤥.
May Allah bless you Akhi, I think you have got the wrong idea. Brother the Salaf had Ijma (consensus) that the one who believes in rebelling against the Muslims ruler is not from Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama'ah. This is clear cut without a shadow of a doubt. Read Usool Us Sunnah of Imam Ahmad, Sharh Us Sunnah of Imam Barbaharee, Manhujus Sunnah An Nawiyyah by Shaykhul Islam Ibn Taymiyyah and I can continue listing for days Akhi. The Hadith you mentioned there is no doubt about it but we can see how the other Hadith explain that “Whoever intends to advise one with authority, he should not do so publicly. Rather, he should take him by the hand and advise him in private. If he accepts the advice, all is well. If he does not accept it, he has fulfilled his duty.”
Source: Musnad Aḥmad 14909 (Grade Sahih)
Likewise the many, many ahadith that prohibit rebellion against the Muslim Ruler (e.g Ibn Hibbān in his Sahīh, no. 4562, authenticated by al-Albānī. Nasa'i 4206. Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1847.Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1855.Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1854. Tiemidhi 1707)
And the Sahabah and the Tabi'een are free from the Khawarij, Wa'audhubillah!
Akhi, the above rulings only apply to MUSLIM rulers in the case of some (Key word is SOME) of the Salaf rebelling, this was because they differed on whether Hajjaj ibn Yusuf was a kaffir or not. The majority held the opinion he was still muslim a minority believed he was not nd rebelled - this does not make them Khawarij.
As for the likes of Hajji, he is the worst type of Khariji (as mentioned by one of the scholars Ibn Jawzi or Ibn Qayyim) the one who calls people to rebellion whilst sitting comfortably in his home in birmingham. Look at the Muslim countries today! How was Syria before they rebelled against Bashar and how is it now?! How was Libya under Gadaffi and how is it now?! How was Iraq under Saddam and how is it now?! Wallahi, our brothers and sisters are getting slaughtered like cattle every, humiliated, in Libya even enslaved. Ahlus Sunnah do not condone the oppression or the evil of Bashar, Gadaffi or Saddam and their likes but unlike these Khawarij we love the muslims and prefer to see them living in at least a peaceful, stable society where kids can go to school. We obey the commandment of the Messenger of Allah so we hear and Obey the ruler even if he opresses us by illegally taking our wealth and whips our backs (as per the hadith)
@@mohuss1804 Look man. I guess you got the wrong idea. Obviously the Salaf are talking about Muslim rulers in a legitimate state. Then I did not say you should go out on the ruler. But actually the Sahabah and their students did not have an Ijma‘. The Ijma‘ came afterwards. And it is not far fetched that the Ijma‘ was influenced by historical events or rather the consequences of rebellion against the ruler. And we have to be fair. If the Ijma‘ came afterwards it cannot be considered absolute because it cannot be applied to the people before the Ijma‘ or rather the Salaf. To say that someone is not upon the Salaf if he goes out on the ruler is insane. Because there Sahaba and students of them themselves who have gone out against the ruler. Obviously Mu‘āwiyya did fight Ali the Khalifah and disobeyed him. You could say this was wrong. But could you say he is not upon the Salaf. That’s ridiculous. And there are restrictions to the prohibition of rebellion against the ruler. If the ruler changes the religion of Allah he lost his legitimacy. The first step is giving advice. First of all privately then publicly and then disputing authority. All that in case the people can do that without suffering great harm from the ruler. Today we have ruler who change the religion by force and they aid the Kuffar against Muslims. If nothing is said publicly and nothing is done than the people will eventually fall into Kufr.
Look, you can’t use one part of the Sunnah and leave the other. Use the whole Sunnah and learn what attributes should the ruler have not to fall under the kind of rulers whom are not allowed to be rebelled against. And look up if all that is applicable to nowadays rulers because nowadays is what interests us.
Another thing. I do not promote rebellion against the ruler even if does not have legitimacy when the consequences are worse than the situation before rebellion. I do not say people should go to the streets if that leads to massacres and rape of women and so on and so forth. In that particular case it could also be Haram to go out than because of the great evil that follows. But we could only say that if the great evil is more likely to happen than relief and stability. That all in case the ruler does not have legitimacy to rule as actually most states if not all because of changing the religion and aiding Kuffar. The hadiths all of them apply to rulers who apply the prayer and take the Zakat and expand the Islamic borders and apply the Hudud. But it’s not the case today. So my objection to rebellion today has only to do with Fasād and harm and the better among to choices.
We could talk all along but it’s a huge thing.
Advice by the way cannot be made privately if you cannot contact the ruler or the person of authority or the person in charge or whatsoever. And if the ruler or anyone has done something publicly which is wrong the advice comes publicly if there’s no other option which is nowadays almost always the case.
@Yonis Ali i wrote another comment explaining the affair of the Salaf but it did not appear for some reason therefore calm down before u call someone ignorant and go read the books of the Salaf first.
The Salaf are free from the Khawarij no doubt! Now all the points above were about the impermissibility of rebelling against the MUSLIM ruler, as for a minority of the Salaf rebelling against Hajjaj ibn Yusuf was because they believed Al Hajjaj fell into major kufr whereas the majority of the Salaf believed he was still Muslim. As you can see they disputed if the leader was a kaffir NOT if rebellion was permissible.
When the Madkhalis label you a Khawarj you know you are on the Haqq!
That’s bit too far don’t you think, you might want to look at who they call khawarij...
Or youre just a Khariji🤷♂️
@Mosaab نعم هو I can’t be all of them 😂 at least learn how to use a word 🤦
@Mosaab نعم هو but still can’t use the term correctly 🤷♂️
@Mosaab نعم هو ?
This was not an interview. This was a lesson ! Amazing ! And this was just a taster from the looks of it!
Can’t believe what I just heard.. and shocking what’s being brushed under the carpet for years !
Lol sunnnnnni! Islam! 😆
Assalamualaikum,
Has Tareeq Najd been published in English or urdu?
Are there any other books on this subject in those languages?
Please let me know. Jazakallah khair
wa 'alaikumus-salaam. it is better if you ask them directly through their instgram or emails
Best podcast so far 👌
What hajji is not mentioning is that the Muslims can only overthrow a ruler who commits Kufr Buwa (open kufr as clear as night and day) when they have the ABILITY! And as Shaykh ul Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah said that if forbidding an evil leads to MORE evil then forbidding that initial evil becomes HARAM. Remember it is Allaah who grants the kingdom to whom HE wills and dishonours who He wills. The Early Salaf rebelled but the proofs did not reach all of them until later when an IJMA (consensus) was reached amongst the scholars of the Salaf that rebellion khurooj was haram. BUT as our present ulama say that if khurooj already took place and fighting erupts then you fight until the word of Allaah (Tawheed) is UPPERMOST. The Hadith of flogging of the ruler and hearing and obeying him is to prevent more vices in society and this IMAM who flogs is RULING by the Shari’ah.
So when the Madhi comes to put justice on the earth but starts with Saudi, where will these Salafi movements be? Will they say this is wrong to him? Will they side with the rulers of the country?
It's reasonable to presume that some with join the Mahdi and some with join with the Taghut rulers. Presently, KSA is being secularized and liberalized by the monarchy and the West causing massive damage. Salafi movement is severely persecuted with many ulama in prison
The grandchildren of the Prophet Muhammad in the Hijaz and they are on the Salafiyyah
The Mahdi will not be an Ash'ari, a Sufi, or a Shiite.. Rather, a Muslim who follows the texts of the Qur'an with the understanding of the family of the Prophet Muhammad in the Hijaz.
@@عبدالله-ن6ه2ص brother, he will be a Muslim, full stop. The Saudi rulers follow they way of the Salafi, which they have decided to create today. Their version. I dont think you get my question brother. The Salafi movement today are there to protect the rulers and scholars who do not agree with their way of doing things are going missing or put in jail. The salaf of the past were muslims. They didnt call their selves Salafi. Do you understand what's going on here? So the Madhi will come and go against the way of the people who call them Salafi today because they do what the ruler tells them, even if its injustice they keep their mouth closed. This is not the way of the Salaf.
@@onepurpose1625 the Sahaba (RAH) were strategic thinkers, visionaries, able to think, adapt, and envision a reality where the Deen of Allah and the Cause of Allah were Supreme. Today's Salafi movements have betrayed the Salaf was Salih. They oppose strategic adaptive thinking, they demand unconditional obedience to Tawaghit rulers like in Egypt, Jordan, KSA, and betrayed the Salafis of Yemen, Iraq, Syria to be destroyed for Saudi national interests and power. KSA betrayals have compounded over the last decades with untold numbers of believers killed, tortured, imprisoned by their hands and words worldwide. The War in Yemen began with KSA betraying Salafis in Dammaj to be killed by the 100s which established the power of Houthis and separated KSA Nationalist forces from Islamic forces, which is what KSA wanted to placate America. Houthis took Sanaa and the palace thereafter.
They will probably reject him, he will be a unique being that certain folks will recognise him immediately
These podcasts are really really well presented & the questions asked are really what he ask not some snow flake questions.
Brother Hajji is on the HAQ!!!!
Bro Hajji brings proof for his arguments as seen on his videos.
he brings proof like the shias bring proof... Imam Hussain was fooled by the shias, the kawarij like bro kariji are sisters of shias, using their lies on Hussain as evidence...
ok lets keep it simple Hasan did teh opposite of Hussain, was Hasan wrong? You know in Sunni Islam Hasan is more virtuous no?
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 Hasan رضي الله عنه was not in the wrong. Neither was Hussayn رضي الله عنه. Both are vitreous. Why the comparison?
Refuting leaders is not khuruj. But refuting is to be done wisely by well versed people.
I may disagree with somethings with Shamsi and Bro Hajji but wallahi I still love them for the sake of Allah and benefit a lot from their knowledge
Dilly & Hajji.. mashAllah Good combination.
Well done Bro Hajji & Bro Dilly - may Allahswt reward you both for exposing the biggest poison in the ummah atm......
he brings proof like the shias bring proof... Imam Hussain was fooled by the shias, the kawarij like bro kariji are sisters of shias, using their lies on Hussain as evidence...
ok lets keep it simple Hasan did teh opposite of Hussain, was Hasan wrong? You know in Sunni Islam Hasan is more virtuous no?
Part 2
Virtues of Banu Tamim :
Bani Tameem constitute the majority of the Najd in Saudi Arabia. Recall Najd just means elevated land.
Ibn Abdul Wahab At Tamimi's tribe in hadiths :
Sahih Bukhaaree report of Abu Hurayra, *"I have loved the tribe of Bani Tameem, ever since I heard three things the Messenger of Allah, Sallallahu Alayhi wa Sallam, said about them I heard him saying, these people, would stand firm against the dajjaal.' When the Saddaqat from that tribe came, the Messenger of Allah, Sallahu Alayhi wa Sallam said, "These are charitable gifts of our folk." aa'isha had a slave girl from that tribe, and the Prophet Sallallaahu Alayhi wa Sallam said to Aa'ishah, manumit her as she is decendant of Isma'eel, alayhis Salaam."*
Hadith no. 2543, book 49 Manumission of Slaves
, (13)Chapter: Whoever possessed Arab slaves.
4366 of Al Fath.
Ibn Hajr al Asqalani said, This hadith clear mentions of excellence, and superiority of Bani Tameem." (fath 5/217)
Hadith of ikrama from one of the companions reported in the Musnad of Imam Ahmad, *"Do not say of Bani Tamim anything but good, for indeed they are the severest of people in attacking the Dajjaal." Al Haythamee says : its narrators are sahih." Mujma 10/48 chpt : What is reported on banu Tamim.*
Is it not strange that those who are severe on Dajjaal, (who are our Saudi Salafi scholars in modern day) are required to have firm belief and proper knowledge -. (yet people of the sufi and she'a grave worship & bidah gone way of Quran 9 :31 preists and rabbis attack them)
By slandering ibn Abdul Wahab, they slander the Sunnah he revived and the companions Radiyallahu anhum who praised his virtuous tribe who carries his dawa today - against the teachings of the Sunna as he is sever on dajjal, this shows ahlul bida, etc. are wrong on this too!
Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab revived the Aqidah of Al - Islam and Sahih Sunnah, when people who worshipping the graves of the companions, Radiyallalhu anhum. (like christians do to their saints)
*Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 3261
- Umar ibn al-Khattab reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Do not exaggerate my praises as the Christians have done with the son of Mary. Verily, I am only a servant, so refer to me as the servant of Allah and his messenger.”*
Sufyan ath Thawri may Allah have mercy on him said, "Bida is more beloved to Iblees, than sins. This is because sins are repented from while bida are not repented from."
May Allāh preserve and protect Muhammad ibn Salman, Āmīn.
Amen 🙏
With socks like that, you can keep Hajji
That's a low blow, or is it it just bcus your structed to look at the boots 👢 of people 🤔? 😁
Gangu Teli
Are you guys. Sunni defence still with hajji on this issue of khurooj???
Sad to know that Sunni Defense is with Hajji.
@@MohammedAlSharif2002 I don't think they are. They did release a statement saying they don't agree with him on this issue
Muslim reported in his Sahīh (1847) from Wā’il Ibn Hujr that: Salamah Ibn Yazeed Al-Ju’fee asked Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ): “O Prophet of Allah, what do we do if we have rulers over us who demand their rights yet they withhold our rights?” He replied: “Listen to them and obey them [regardless]. Upon them is their burden and on you will be your burden.”
@Dorus ullah Ibn Abī ‘Āsim reported in As-Sunnah (2/508) from ‘Adiyy Ibn Hātim (may Allah be pleased with him) that we said: “O Messenger of Allah, we do not ask you regarding obedience to the ruler who has taqwā (who is pious and who fears Allah), and is good and rectifies. Rather, we are asking about the ruler who does such-and-such and such-and-such?“ And he mentioned their evil traits. So the Prophet (ﷺ) answered: “Fear Allah! Listen to the ruler and obey him.” (Also reported by At-Tabarāni in Al-Kabīr, 17/101, and authenticated by Al-Albāni in Dhilāl Al-Jannah)
MashaAllah.
The knowledge on display here is inspiring and we need more of this as the ummah is struggling.
Please can brother Bro Hajji come back on and delve deeper into the conspiracy of the Najd sect and maybe you guys could talk about other topics such as the history of Muslim Spain & the reasons for the decline of the Spanish Muslims, practical things that young British Muslims can do to reconnect to the history of this great religion, managing a COVID world where our children are being attacked from all angles to accept LGBTQ and other issues that affect our community???
This is what is needed as we are lacking direction and there are many many imposters such as Maajid Nawaz out there who are leading the masses to the pits of hell.
May Allah protect you brothers, keep you humble and continue to allow you to bring this kind of dialogue to the community. Ameen
I heard a Pakistani pro-Army alim who said on TV that there were no rebellions against Hajjaj. Amazing !
جزاک اللہ خیر
This was very beneficial
Bro H, here here! MashaAllah, keep educating Bro!
Great respect to Bro D also, for hosting and knowledgeable presence.
Tariq ibn Shihab reported: A man asked the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, “What is the best jihad?” The Prophet said, “A word of truth in front of a tyrannical ruler.”
Source: Musnad Aḥmad 18449
Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Nawawi
عَنْ طَارِقِ بْنِ شِهَابٍ أَنَّ رَجُلًا سَأَلَ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ أَيُّ الْجِهَادِ أَفْضَلُ قَالَ كَلِمَةُ حَقٍّ عِنْدَ سُلْطَانٍ جَائِرٍ
18449 مسند أحمد مسند العشرة المبشرين بالجنة
117 المحدث النووي خلاصة حكم المحدث إسناده صحيح في تحقيق رياض الصالحين
Did not Hussain r.a nd the rest with him fought the best jihad against yazid???
Yes allhumdullilah. But spubs madkhalis and those who are in bed with the tyrants conveniently never mention this hadeeth.
@@pallyali786 Akhi, fear Allah. There are other ahadith that mention this is not to be done IN PUBLIC but IN PRIVATE! Please do not go down this dangerous, Khariji road. Study all the ahadith about rulers. Save yourself from the Fire 🔥
@@ahmedibnadam5038 brother listen to me. I don't consider these rulers as legitimate rulers of the Muslims. They are Western puppets who are out there to serve the Zionist agenda. They are not my rulers mate. They are not the rulers of the Muslimeen neither are they caliphs. I am not obliged to obey them or boot lick them. The hadeeth is crystal clear. Speaking a word of truth Infront of a tyrant is the pinnacle. Tell your so called rulers to stop sleeping with the Zionist scum.
@@ahmedibnadam5038 if you have done in private it will still be known in public politics boundaries differ with social boundaries
Alhamdulillah
Dilly will you be fair and bring on someone to respond to Naheem argument or is your podcast only exclusive to rappers and anyone against the ‘madakhila’??
Salafism movement started after colonialism
I can't believe you have fools already clicking the dislike button.
Brother let them do what they like the truth hurts sometimes.
@@MegaMucahid Yes you are right my man. It exposes there kibr and just exposes how shallow they are and how they are sheep who are just blind following. They need to read the following as it's a serious matter.
Abdullah ibn Mas’ud reported: The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “No one who has the weight of a seed of arrogance in his heart will enter Paradise.” Someone said, “But a man loves to have beautiful clothes and shoes.” The Prophet said, “Verily, Allah is beautiful and he loves beauty. Arrogance means rejecting the truth and looking down on people.”
In another narration, the Prophet said, “No one who has the weight of a seed of faith in his heart will enter Hellfire.”
Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 91
@@pallyali786 Sadaqt brother. May Allah, protect us from kibr. Allahumma Amin
@@MegaMucahid ameen
their presence on the internet is strong, they're known for this!
Dick Dastardly and Muttley with sick laughter??
Bro Hajji repping MF Doom in a previous life 😂
JazakAllahu Khairan for this interesting conversation :)
Loving bro Hajji
Mashallah Great Podcast brothers
Eye opening podcast
Does anyone know if 5pillars has interviewed a salafi or someone from the salafi movement?
Please link the video in the reply.
Jazak Allah Khair.
I appreciate that brother Dilly support Mohammed it is very kind of him. Because brother Hajji has his followers in RUclips wa lakin it could be more and this one of the ways to spread the real Islam not the way like the Madhalis do it. SubhanAllah as long it is Saudi Arabia everything is mubah but when it comes to meselen Turkey or other Muslim countries I am not talking about sharia ruled countries I mean Muslims then there is no support for them 4 years ago there was the coup attempt in Turkey I heard nothing from Da'wah boy or people like him. The whole Arabia is build on khuruj everybody knows that. They killed Kashoggi brutaly in the embassy this cowards. May Allah give them what they deserve
Maa Shaa ALLAAH! Barakallaahu Feekum
Saved sect meaning safe from the oppressors. These madkhalis actually say rahimahullah after the saudi kings name, specifically abu khadija.
yep, sadly it really means to them saved from the hell fire, while obviously everyone else is in it(hell)! paradise is exclusively for them, how crazy is that
@my name is my name who is a madkali?
Zayd رضي الله عنه was martyred in Uyanah and people made a dome over his grave and people started to make tawaf around his grave and make dua to him in his grave. These are the reason the dome over his grave was destroyed and these are the kind of people Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab made takfir of.
Fair enough but dyu really gotta destroy his grave he should’ve just put the dome over it without destroying ZAYD رضي الله عنه grave
Muhammad ibn Abdul wahab done takfir of anyone who supported the Ottoman khilafa. This is in his own books.
@@anique_hussain he levelled the grave according to the hadith of the prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم. He destroyed the dome above the grave not the contents of the grave.
@@anique_hussain you people have more of an issue with the shrines and domes over graves being destroyed than the shirk being committed at the graves
When Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab destroyed the domes over the graves and forbidded the people from worshipping the graves the local tribes opposed him for this and wanted to fight him. These are the kind of people who Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab fought. Your shaykh bro hajji is not giving you the full context. He's trying to make it seem like Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab made takfir on anyone who wasn't with him. It's very simple he made takfir on people who committed shirk and he fought against them and he fought against those allies of the arab pagans and against those who waged war against him and his dawah.
2 of my fravorite brothers
Quran Translation - English Only evidence?
”there is no unity with these people” it couldnt be truer..... i always said the first thing to do if we want unity and khilafa back is to push them the farthest....... and no khilafa will ever stand as long as these still have a single word in the discussion
The part of the hadith where it states, "even if he (the ruler) lashes your back and takes your wealth," has been declared as a weak addition to the hadith
@@Abu_Muslim_111 Yes it has, but they use other hadiths to strengthen it.
Weakness of Hadîth: “You listen to and obey the leader, even if he beats your back and takes your wealth.” By Haytham Sayfaddîn - Part 1:
Imâm Muslim narrated this saying: And Muhammad Ibn Sahl Ibn ‘Askar at-Tamîmî told me: Yahyâ Ibn Hassân told us: *Hâ’: And ‘Abdullâh Ibn ‘Abdir-Rahmân ad-Dârimî told us: Yahyâ, and he is Ibn Hassân told us: Mu’âwiyah, and he is Ibn Salâm, told us: On the authority of Abû Sallâm who said: Huthayfah Ibn al-Yamân said: However, he narrated it within the **Mutâba’ât, not in the Usûl.
Imâm ad-Dâraqutnî stated: “And Muslim narrated the Hadîth of Mu’âwiyah Ibn Salâm on the authority of Zayd on the authority of Abû Sallâm on the authority of Huthayfah…And this, in my opinion, is Mursal; Abû Sallâm did not hear from Huthayfah, nor from his peers who went to ‘Irâq. (This is) because Huthayfah passed away (just) nights after the murder of ‘Uthmân, رضي الله عنه. And in it, it contains ‘Huthayfah said’, so this indicates that it is ‘Mursal.’” “Al-Ilzâmât wat-Tatabbu’”, (pg. 181-182).
In other words, he did not say he heard it from Huthayfah.
And Imâm An-Nawawî stated: “Ad-Dâraqutnî stated: ‘This, in my opinion, is ‘Mursal.’’ And it is as Ad-Dâraqutnî said.” “Al-Minhâj Sharh Sahîh Muslim Ibn al-Hajjâj”, Vol. 12/237
Al-Wâdi’î stated: “In this Hadîth of Huthayfah, there is an addition which is not in the Hadîth of Huthayfah which is agreed upon, and it is his statement: ‘And even if he beats your back and takes your wealth.’ So this addition is weak, because it is from this severed path.” “Al-Ilzâmât Wat-Tatabbu’”, pg. 182
Ibn Hajar stated: “And he narrated in ‘Mursal’ form from Huthayfah, Abû Tharr and others.” “Tahthîb at-Tahthîb”, Vol. 10/296
So in and of itself, we see that this narration is weak. Next, we will discuss the narrations used to attempt to strengthen this weak narration.
And this is the opinion of Shaykh Sulaymân Ibn Nâsir al-‘Alwân and Abdul-‘Azîz Ibn Marzûq at-Tarîfî.
And Allâh Knows Best.
Haytham Sayfaddîn
________________________________
*Hâ’: Muhaddithîn place this letter in their chains of transmission when restarting their chain with another of their Shaykhs whom they heard the same Hadîth from.
**Mutâba’ât: Secondary narrations narrated by an author after the main narration which meets the standards of their book.
Weakness of Hadîth: “You listen and obey the leader, even if he beats your back and takes your wealth.” - Haytham Sayfaddîn - Part 2:
Some have tried to reject this by saying: There is another narration of this Hadîth that isn’t from the path of Abû Sallâm from Huthayfah. They quote: Imâm Ahmad said: Muhammad Ibn Ja’far told us: Shu’bah told us: On the authority of Abut-Tayyâh who said: I heard Sakhr narrating from Subay’ who said:…
However, this is weak as well. Sakhr is Sakhr Ibn Badr al-‘Ijlî al-Basrî who is unknown.
Likewise, Subay’ is Subay’ Ibn Khâlid al-Yashkarî al-Basrî. He was only declared trustworthy by Al-‘Ijlî and Ibn Hibbân. And being declared trustworthy by them is not enough to make someone a reliable narrator, and more particularly, it is not enough for a Hadîth of this nature to be accepted. This is because it contradicts a Hadîth narrated by those who are more acceptable.
Likewise, it was narrated by Nasr Ibn ‘Âsim on the authority of Subay’ Ibn Khâlid. Narrated by Ahmad Ibn Hanbal.
Furthermore, it was narrated by ‘Alî Ibn Zayd on the authority of Subay’ Ibn Khâlid. Narrated by Ahmad. However, ‘Alî Ibn Zayd is weak. He was weakened by Yahyâ Ibn Sa’îd al-Qattân, Abû Ahmad al-Hâkim, Yahyâ Ibn Ma’în, Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, Abû Hâtim ar-Râzî, An-Nasâ’î, Ibn Hibbân, Abû Zur’ah ar-Râzî, Alî Ibn al-Madînî, Ibn Khuzaymah and many others.
And in place of Abû Sallâm from Huthayfah there is Zayd Ibn Wahb. Narrated by Ahmad. However, this is a mistake from those reading “Musnad Ahmad” in believing that this chain was related to this Hadîth. In reality, this chain relates to a separate Hadîth about trustworthiness being removed from people. This was pointed out by the Muhaddith ‘Abdur-Rahmân al-Faqîh.
So we see that this is not actually a supporting narration for this Hadîth.
In short, we see that the narration of Al-Bukhârî and the main narration of Muslim does not contain this phrase. And the narrations used to support it are either mistakes that don’t actually say this, weak narrations or, at best, not as strong as the narration that does not contain it.
And Allâh Knows Best.
Haytham Sayfaddîn
@Mr. EA this isn't copying and pasting from a random website. This is copied directly from author of the article.
Don't come and divert from the topic by asking me about my level of arabic. I just posted evidence to show the the statement, "even if he beats your back and takes your wealth," is weak and also the other evidence that people try to use to strengthen is also weak.
@Mr. EA ok present the other chains of transmission that strengthens it?
Part 2 of the thing that i posted proves that all other chains of transmission are weak
Mashallah both my fav personalities!
When Shaykh Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab conquered the land of the tribes that were fighting against him for his dawah to tawheed, he replaced the tribal laws and customs with the Shariah
Please come back to earth yalla
@Dorus ullah he did very little good.
@Dorus ullah I think it's a bad misconception that his books were "good". They were extremely basic, with no nuance, and nothing of great substance. Basically like elementary school level stuff
@Dorus ullah I know people speak about it today as if it's some amazing book, but really it's just the social media Muslims and the loud aggressive sect
@@hassanabdaladl it is an amazing book
Right, this issue about rulers.
1. The ahadith that say we should obey the ruler even if he is unjust applies when the Muslims don't have the ability to remove him by force. Removing by force means without a worse fitna coming about,, and having the capability to do it.
2. There is also the issue of speaking out against the ruler, which is allowed, of course. If we don't speak up, how will people know? Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal rahimahullah said that if you remain silent when there is evil, then the evil will spread.
3. The obedience also applies if the ruler outwardly rules by Shariah. For example, a ruler could rule by shariah outwardly, but he stole someones wealth secretly. Even in that context he would have to be obeyed in that which is halal.
4. Why did the people of the past rebel against rulers then? Why did Ibn Taymiya fight against the Tarters then? And there are many examples.
There's a good explanation of this in Maudoodi's tafsir.
Ohoo muhammad bin Salman messed up everything for salafis . 😅😅😅😅😅🤣🤣🤣 . It is Muhammad bin Salman who revealed this salafi movement by this rebellious action . The more he rebells , the more salafi movement will be revealed . 😅🤣🤣🤣🤣😅😅😅😅😅😅
Spot on, before him they could get away with fooling the laymen
actually make a point instead of putting in 30 emojis
Me and bro hajji don’t live too far from each other I think we can go to speakers corner together 😂
Epic episodes 👍
Im disgusted at the atrocities done by wahabis in the name of religion, even though I follow theological positions of ibn taymyya(r.h).
Again Bro Hajji gives the mudkalis chance to survive.
Have u recovered?
Question:
What is the ruling on demonstrations? What are the evidences for its permissibility? And what are the evidences for its prohibition?
Answer:
The issue of demonstration is a long one, and I will summarize my words regarding it by saying:
Some of the brothers that said that demonstrations are permissible researched in the Sunnah after evidences for this, so they mentioned for example the famous hadeeth of Abu Hurayrah regarding the neighbor[1], something which is these days referred to as "rousing the public opinion", the source for this hadeeth is in Sunan Abi Dawud.
And also they use the hadeeth of Abdullah bin Iyas bin Abi Dhubaba where women complained (in front of the Prophet (ﷺ)) regarding their husbands (i.e. a female demonstration)[2], and this is also narrated in Sunan Abi Dawud.
But all of this isn't necessary (to prove it's permissibility), because the rule is: "Nothing is legislated in this Religion except what Allah has legislated, and nothing becomes forbidden except what Allah has forbidden." So the rule is regarding worship ('ibadah) is that of tawqif (i.e. not permissible to exceed beyond), so there's a must to provide an evidence for it.
And the rule regarding customary things ('adaat) is that they are in general permissible. So whoever forbids something is asked to provide an evidence (daleel) for it, this is the fundamental rule (asl) regarding this.
So whoever permitted demonstrations and holds to this fundamental rule, then he is of no need to bring forth any evidences, because nothing is haram except what Allah has made haram. And even if one brought forth evidences to prove this, then it's being generous. So what's left for us is to see what those that forbid demonstrations have for evidence, then afterwards we can answer them and let the issue be finished (over with).
The most famous evidences that they have are three: That it is an innovation (bid'ah), that it is imitating the disbelievers, that it is forbidden as a means to block an evil (sad al-dhara'i) which leads corruptions (fasad).
1) With regards to their argument that it's a bid'ah, then this is false (batil). Because bid'ah is in matters pertaining to worship ('ibadah), not customary things ('adaat). And thus there isn't any need for redundancy of words to show that this argument is void.
2) With regards to their argument that is imitating the disbelievers, then this is also false. For history is filled with people gathering and marching and demanding something. And go back to the history of Uthman (رضي الله عنه) and go back to the history of al-Basrah and al-Kufa in the latter half of the first century (hijri), and see how plentiful these sort of demonstrations were. This isn't to prove that its something legislated or permissible, rather it is evidence that it isn't from the issues of imitating the disbelievers.
3) And regarding their argument that its something that leads to corruption (fasad), then this is not correct. Because we see it taking place everywhere and there is no corruption that takes place like which they claim will come about.
Rather great benefits (masalih 'adhimah) have come through it, like the overthrowing of the Egyptian taghut (i.e. Mubarak). And his overthrowing - even though it didn't bring forth a Islamic governance - eased the injustice and tyranny, and it brought forth some justice that weren't there during his (i.e. Mubarak) time.
This is a quick summary regarding this issue, and Allah knows best.
___________________________________________________________
The source for the Fatwa is Fatawa al-Ha'iriyyah, a compilation of fatawa by the Shaykh from inside the prison of al-Ha'ir, KSA.
[1] Full hadeeth:
Abu Hurayra said, "A man said, 'Messenger of Allah, I have a neighbour who does me harm.' He said, 'Go and take your things out into the road.' He took his things out into the road. People gathered around him and asked, 'What's the matter?' He replied, 'A neighbour of mine injures me and I mentioned it to the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace. He told me, "Take your things out into the road."' They began to say, 'O Allah, curse him! O Allah, disgrace him!' When the man heard that, he came out to him and said, 'Go back to your home. By Allah, I will not harm you.'"
sunnah.com/adab/6/24
[2] Full hadeeth:
Iyas bin 'Abdullah (May Allah be pleased with him) reported:
Messenger of Allah said, "Do not beat Allah's bondwomen." When 'Umar (May Allah be pleased with him) came to Messenger of Allah and complained saying: "The women have become very daring towards their husbands," He gave permission to beat them. Then many women went to the family of the Messenger of Allah (wives) complaining of their husbands, and he (the Prophet) said, "Many women have gone round Muhammad's family complaining of their husbands. Those who do so, that is, those who take to beating their wives, are not the best among you".
Bro Hajji might not have felt it after 4 spoons of Mr Naga but his toilet will definitely have felt it that night
@Ibrahim Ibn Mahmud Bro Hajji in the video addresses his attitude. Did you watch it?
In your video he apologises publicly. For raw insults like mentioning being on drugs or pusillanimous.
But calling someone ignorant does not fall into that.
Bro Hajji called Dawahboy an Ikhwani as he was using the same rules as him... It showed Dawahboy's double standards. But of course you wouldnt show the context.
@Ibrahim Ibn Mahmud Did you watch this podcast where he addresses it ??
Your quote does not fit this situation btw. its not like Bro Hajji has only insulted him? yes, that isnt right and (again he's apologised) but Bro Hajji has filled his videos with references (full references, Imran was caught by Bro Hajji to only use parts of references (cant remember which video)).
And you;re defending Dawahboy? Are you going to make a video about him insulting others by calling them innovators, ikhwani, etc?? Or does that not fit your agenda?
@Ibrahim Ibn Mahmud Lol first of all.. I've never met Bro Hajji for him to be my teacher. 2nd with your list of teachers is clear to see your ilk.
3rd - Bro Hajji gave evidences for everything he said. He also said he does not think muslim should rebel but you have to respect the difference of opinion. your teachers are now making videos about Bro Hajji mispronunciation instead of addressing the issue... do us a favour and tell them to drop their arrogance and just accept there is a legit difference of opinion.
4th - "Making a video on dawah man doing the same thing would be very hard, as I wouldn't have much content to work with" Are you serious? This guy has been making video for how long? It does not fit your agenda for you to make a video about dawahboy that is why you wont do it. You talk about Bro Hajji's attitude (which again he addressed AND I said is wrong above)... but Dawahboy literally has an attitude problem... he calls people innovators and Khariji without hesitation.
Loved it
"barelvis/sufis" are traditional Sunni Muslims and the majority in the Islamic world.
@Dorus ullah Ahlus Sunnah are not upon the wrong. The ummah never unites upon falsehood. Ahlus Sunnah is the true and correct way and path.
@Dorus ullah first of all it's you're, not "your". And you've proven yourself to be a deviant by declaring me to be upon shirk (which is a lie), with zero evidence to back up your false claim. You are a fool, and a deviant, wait for the day of youm ul qiyamah, where your slander and false charges against me will be used against you, wait and see.
@Dorus ullah No it isn't you're an idiot and a fool who has got himself in colossal trouble. Get ready to defend your false and slanderous accusation on youm ul qiyamah.
Lmao Barelvis are traditional Sunni Muslims ???? What are you smoking lmaoooooooo these guys are clear cut Murtadeen.
@@AF-xp2yb You must be smoking crack if you're about to declare anywhere from 100-200 million people "murtadeen". And just ftr, Ibn Taymiyyah WAS a sufi.
You and your ilk and in the minority.
Salaam, if I wanted to learn about Islamic politics, where should I start ?
Walekom Assalam, tryv reading "The Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam" written by Allama Iqbal ... the book is in english and urdu
If you haven't studied the Qur'an and sunnah first, then I wouldn't suggest studying politics.
Study the quran and sunnah
Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab raised the banner of Jihad against those tribes who opposed his call to Tawheed.
not justifiable but understandable.love u bro hajji even if you do not answer my messages
Please stop this disgusting name calling.
The rest of the content was good, but calling Muslims waste papers etc. changes the dynamic of the conversation.
JazakAllahkhair for this May Allah swt reward you both
I know refutation has its place in Islam, but i feel its taken over the modern day version of islam, its sad to see brothers have come to this, its almost like rap battles, some are just refuting to make themselves relevant.
fozpringle1 very true refutations are for the Scholars not for small students of know,edge like Dawah man and Hajji
@Yonis Ali My original point was about our own brothers arguing amongst themselves, its sad to see. So whats Christians or other religions got to do with this, thats a different topic altogether. Refutation should be done in private, not plastered all over RUclips with funny thumbnails, its now become tit for tat
@Yonis Ali yes ideally this should be the case Akhi, but it's gone far and beyond this now. People are responding now that's all....