The fact that they released yet another 240hz panel and have the cheek to charge even more than the last one from years ago should tell people all they need to know about zowie
I would just get an OLED at this point. 360Hz at 1440p is doable. Only downside is that when you decide to play at a tournament, they'll downgrade you to a Zowie.
@@keestojuusto6072 Seems their strategy is to be the main e-sports monitor sponsor, having their monitors be used on every tournament and then cashing in on the pros wanting a consistent experience at home and at the tournament.
@@keestojuusto6072 benq was good in past where there were no good monitor out there.. now they are just refreshing monitors with better dyac but input lag is terrible for small monitor.
Would've been good to have a Dyac 1 vs Dyac 2 visual comparison. Especially considering no reviewer that I've seen thus far has been able to actually demonstrate the value in Dyac 2, and since Zowie are delusional enough to think that the change from Dyac 1 to Dyac 2 is worthy of a $100 USD price increase, a greater focus on that would be appreciated. Good video as always, weird product though.
I got this monitor and had to return after 10 min of gameplay, paying 450$ with discount to get a defect unit. In the center with dark pixels and Im glad I returned it. I dont know what is happening with zowie but all products I buy from them Its been complete trash. Only good product I had from zowie was like 5+ years ago with the EC2-A that still works and have less qc than brand new ec2-c copies I had. Another thing to keep in mind Dyac+ 2 or whatever will look good on blurbusters blur test or marketing zowie videos because in game is not that much of a diference. I have to agree with you and the comments paying full price on this specs is like buying apple products, 90% ppl using "professional" grade products will never make it pro level, better off enjoying better image quality than tryhard in games for nothing. Also even if you buy this there is still a chance to get defect monitor or dead pixels and good luck for the hassle to return it and live with it.
i feel like most of the people watching this aren't competitve gamers, i want the best experience playing cs and the least amount of hardware bottlenecking my ability to play well. 1080p, 240hz is plenty enough for a high level (faceit level 10) cs player, and my computer only pushed 300 or so fps on average at 1080, i don't want some expensive oled that first doesn't come in the 1080p resolution and not in a 24" size combined. I know that if i was to get an oled i would spend maybe double the price of this since i would also need to get a better gpu to be even able to push enough fps at the higher resolution. As i found it's not really that good to set custom resolutions significantly lower than the monitor (so 1080p native a 720p custom res would still look ok, but from a 2k native a 720p res would be not that great, which i have tested)
Current OLEDs, without BFI, don't do anything to combat persistence blur caused by sample and hold. They are worse in motion than any monitor with BFI or backlight strobing. We need to push manufacturers to include BFI on their OLEDs too for motion clarity's sake
@@AnimeUniverseDE Have you actually seen an OLED monitor? 240 Hz has VERY good motion clarity and BFI is largely irrelevant at that refresh rate. Even 120 Hz looks great. BFI is fine if you are stuck at 60. I'm glad that ASUS included it in there QD-OLED, but using it comes at the cost of VRR and HDR. Still its fine for a game that you can run at a locked 120 fps, but can't hit 240 and that's a maybe. 240 no BFI >>> 120 w/BFI
@@rickgear2579 yes I have the C2 and have seen by how much BFI improves things. The C2 can use BFI at 60hz and while it flickers a bit at that refresh the motion is even clearer than at 120hz without BFI. It is really incredible, with BFI. Which is why I advocate for its inclusion
Out of curiosity why 24"? Is it for better pixel density? I ask this because i currently run a 27" 1440p monitor, it's over 5 years old and looking to upgrade to something around €400. My current monitor has a gsync module and I moved to an AMD gpu so i can't use VRR.
you do not need 24 inch to be good you can game at 34 inch and playing good.. Small monitor your face needs to be on monitor.. bigger monitor your head is in normal position. YOu need to try and see.. Best is 27 inch no matter what.
@@FROSTB4NE Simply put, I want a smaller screen because I find them more comfortable to use and they take up less space. I won't have to move my eyes as much.
Leave it to little oled cultits to bring their dump obsession to superior- competitive gaming focused- options..OMG!!! I AM JUST GET A 32-48 INCH 4K OLED instead!!!OMG!!!
@@griffin1366 Dude, I would beat you in any game with 5e worth Genius mouse and 75hz monitor and sub 100 fps. Muh competitive lol. This monitor is worse than other cheaper TNs despite the marketing gimmick Dyac. They should rename it to D1ck'ya:D :D
I think there is still a good place for monitors like these, as a secondary display that you only use as a primary display when playing games you want maximum motion clarity performance in; but not at $500, or even $400.
I would need to have my brain removed to pay anything over $300 for a TN panel in 2024. And that's pushing it at the high end. Particularly with high refresh rate 1440p IPS monitors that can match response times, and the increasingly available OLED models as well which have response times that beat it.
OK wait wait, hold up... is BenQ living in a vacuum? You can purchase a KTC G27P6 QHD 240Hz OLED monitor for $552 today. How delusional does the pricing team in BenQ need to be to price this 1080p 240Hz TN monitor at $500?? Damn!
Yeah while fast monitors, these are now very prices when OLEDs are releasing. But new OLED monitors need to start releasing with BFI though. With VRR. I wouldn't be surprised for LCDs to really fall in price once more OLEDs get released. Just lately there was a 4K 1000Hz demo monitor, oddly it was using LCD but I expect consumer OLED 1080p 1000Hz as 4K 240Hz DFR mode.
Please review acer x34 v3, the new miniled ultrawide perfect for people afraid of qd oled burn in. Edit: at this point I won't make any buying decision before seeing your review. Monitorunboxed ftw.
oled just has way fewer weaknesses along with near instant pixel refresh times. My only complaint about oleds is there are no 24" panels, I find 27" just a bit too large.
still no HDMI VRR tests? I don't see this issue in your reviews being resolved any time soon... which means I don't see any value in the reviews tbh as this is a feature that I need to know about. I'll unsubscribe for now, as this very easy to test and report on feature is simply ignored by your team
So if I am looking for the best fps gaming monitor to use with a Series X (120hz) that has the same or better motion blur reduction as Dyac 2, what monitor would you suggest? I want a size 24-25 inch monitor. Any help?
I can tell beforehand: an absolutely amazing monitor. I have the FO32U2P since 16th may and this monitor blows my mind out. Such a fantastic monitor. I love it so much 😍❤
It's like : OLED : Too expensive + can potentially burn-in TN : IT'S 2024, wake up samourai ! IPS : Overshoot + low refresh compliance + bad contrast Help us 🤣
@@De-M-oN Like i said, it's marketing, if LG or anyone else will want to put a "care" logo, they can but it's useless and doesn't prove anything. Anyway Gigabyte and good screen in the same sentence is a hard joke.
@@AquilaeYT The FO32U2P is right now the best of the new OLEDs. so not a joke at all. Its also the only monitor offering DP2.1 UHBR20. So with future GPUs no DSC anymore. The OLED Care function has all the features it needs. pixel shift, corner dim, and so on. Everything there. And seems well implemented too so that you dont really notice it. So what is your point? Why complain about something which does its job? The FO32U2P has also the highest Brightness of the new OLEDs. The FO32U2P is an AMAZING monitor. Not sure what youre complaining about. I have the FO32U2P and couldnt be more happy.
people have to understand that these monitor's are only meant for competitive players and nothing else. These types of monitor's are not meant for casuals, budget ballers etc. Thats how they keep on getting away with these high prices cause competitive players dont care about oled they only want the best competitive advantage.
Did you miss the part where OLEDs kept shitting on this thing? Its response time is 10x higher. Doubt it has nearly as good motion clarity as a half decent OLED. This screen is for broke, or uninformed, competitive players.
Does ULMB2 still require a Nvidia graphics card? If yes it's a huge no, go. Nvidia is less relevant in esports...especially for gamers on a budget who just want the more FPS per $, because that's what matters there...
Guys, I'm looking for a 360hz monitor, I'm not a professional gamer, but I like to take things seriously, the only game I have is CS2, please help me 🙏🏻
500$ is way too close to OLED monitors nowadays, this thing is beyond doa. In my eyes it's very clear that Benq is just making sure their monitors are used by CS pros and the unknowing audience will think they're what they need.
@@DVTHEFOX i had 5 of 66K and all had coil whine lmao, finally ppl's start to notice it, they didn't even care but this one doesn't have any coil whine.
The reason people are willing to pay the absurd price is because it supports 300 nits with strobing. Other monitors could do it but they prefer not to take the chance because the LEDs require 4 times the voltage boost to accomplish this which can wear out the LEDs quickly. BenQ doesn't care and is willing to take the risk
If you really want Zowie 240hz for DYAC, there's a handful on eBay in the US refurbished for like $250-$275 Still not a monitor I'd ever buy, but I'd take the chance on the refurb for that price versus paying $500 for this holy moly.
I've been saying for years it is just marketing gimmick so I was right. They scammed you like Razer with their gaming headsets or keyboards. LOL. Benq is the new Razer, it is the same with their outdated mice without any sw cos muh latency. In fact, they use outdated TN panels and mice without sw support so they cheap out, don't have to support additional features and kids playing Fortnite and CS2 will purchase it. Back in my days, I had 75hz, cheap 5 euro worth black/white genius mice which broke after one year and then I purchased new one. Now, I have Razer Viper Ultimate and RMAing it every year as much and get a new replacement. Previously I had Logitech G900, it developed a double click. RMAed, got G903 hero instead, again developed a double click after 6 months and any fps with ADS was then uplayable cos it randomly zoomed in and instatly unzoomed due to double click issue. MY Corsair keyboard keeps breaking too so I am living on perpetuum mobile strategy, RMA the old stuff and use the money from the old one to purchase new stuff which will break within warranty period too, and repeat the cycle.
@@lavenderlolxd If you think that was an essay we found the reason behind your bad grades. No go tell mommy to buy you a different monitor, IPS or OLED.
G7's have terrible QC issues, and if you're buying used you almost certainly don't get any kind of warranty or support. Not that Samsung support was good to begin with, but it's better than nothing.
Not yet at all lol. Burn is is way too prevalent for productivity still. I use it for daily work and gaming 12hrs a day. At least 3khrs a year. Oleds going to be burnt in after 2 years.
Nope. OLED by itself does nothing to address persistence blur. You severely underestimate how important backlight strobing and BFI is, especially at lower refreshes.
@@HopemanGG Bored of people like you which trust that "UFO test" are a "absolute truth" methodology while it's not the case and don't reflect a real gameplay scenario. Learn about crosstalk.
Old 1080p TN with 240fps + DYAC2 is 0.5ms blur and kills any OLED 1440p 240fps with 4.3ms blur at fast motion . That old TN is equvalent to 2000fps motion clarity. Like those proud 4K 240 OLED users when pixels are moving at 1000pixels/second speed they see 540p effective resolution its hard to explain to those people that 4K is only on static screens.
Because current OLEDs, without BFI, don't do anything to combat persistence blur caused by sample and hold. They are worse in motion than any monitor with BFI or backlight strobing. We need to push manufacturers to include BFI on their OLEDs too
3:36 That's why it would be cool to have variable response time. Like for example set from 30 to 70, which means that from 30fps to 240fps in games it changes from 30 to 70 response time. That way the response time could be always in the best settings you want, to never see too many overshoots or bluriness ghostiong with movement.
It's clearly time to retire TN panels, as clear as my old xl2546 is, which I've used for the past 6 years, they've completely dropped the ball with that asking price and panel tech. goodbye zowie, I've got a new 480hz oled, moneys well spent , and tbh,, I don't even miss using dyac, not even at lower refresh rates like 100~144hz where strobing still works flawlessly giving that crt-like experience.
I have a tons of things to say but before that, thank you for giving us some informations about screens, like always. Well, first, i found that your Response Time chart is a little bit weird if i compare with my experience with this screen, two month ago, i mean, that's not sound really credible but i have some things to say about that. What i found weird is the high/premium OD performance in terms of response time and Refresh Compliance, how that can be so bad while i've used these two mode while i've tested this screen and it feels super smooth and instantly ? (did you try to redo these test or this is a one shot test ?) I found that very weird because some screen (240hz) that you tested with a "better" response time just doesn't feel like the chart in terms of responsiveness so i think there will be some "error" or things to take in consideration, in addition it is weird while we know that OSRTT tool and stuff like that are generally very accurate. It's very interesting tho, also custom OD 17 (your settings) compared to my custom OD 17 (the same) doesn't feel like 8.2% of overshoot but a little bit more, while 8.2% is green (so it's ok, you won't notice it) it is in reality not the case in my experience at 240fps constantly, anyway, hugely dissapointed about how the screen managed so bad the Refresh Compliance by beign a 500 dollars TN panel with only 77.3% (weirdly, this screen feels more smooth than some 85% IPS 240hz panel...so...yeahn i don't really understand.) anyway, this Zowie still have so much less overshoot than IPS competitor. Also, some people will maybe prefer the XL2566K (360hz version) but in fact, this screen have a huge problem of Coil Whine at 360hz (i've had 4) while the XL2546X doesn't Coil Whine at all. So bad that the old XL2546K (K, not X) are not in the Best GtG Performance chart to compare the old and the new. Things that you won't consider while testing : Comfort,Zowie are known to have a "perfect" stand with a "perfect" OSD, Black Equaliser performance are the best of the market and no one IPS panel can do that like Zowie, also Color Vibrancy etc The Armada from HP looks better on paper but i'm pretty sure it's less comfortable and less good to play on this screen than on the BenQ. About Strobing, i've made Alien Pursuit too about Ghosting and Crosstalk and we get similar results, so bad the screen is not compatible with Blur Buster Utility, like, wtf, the XL2546X have imho better strobing performance than the XL2586X💀and the Asus is the best, Zowie today really become dissapointing.
@@Ralipsi he did not turn to the max settings he uses in normal... Because people do not want to have clear image when monitor needs it they have on 12 hours nonstop.
Always liked Zowie's strobing tech but do any actual esport players actually use it? I doubt it. Those monitor companies don't seem to understand that strobing is more useful at lower framerates, it's better for AAA or retrogaming if anything since it makes 60fps looks like 130+fps. If you run a game at 240fps already sure you get even more clarity from the bfi but it's honestly clear enough without. In fact bfi/strobing could increase input lag slightly so serious players would actively turn it off to be sure.
I get 240fps constant in fallout 76, 600+ in cs2 and overwatch, and if anything I just turn gsync on for other titles. i have a 4070ti super @@AquilaeYT
@@C0nnie You don't understand, i don't talk about the performance of the screen or anything like that. I talk about a bug that ALL EX270QM have : When you want to play on 1080p fullscreen, this screen lock the refresh rate at 120hz. If you are naive you won't notice it, so you want the proof ? ok > turn On G-Sync, play at 1080p fullscreen and see the magic stuff appears : a beautiful 1440p screen which show you a cr*p 120hz lock, like, wtf.
never heard of this, never experienced this lol. I have everything running natively at 1440p 240hz. I did uninstall the 4k stuff from nvidia though, which sounds more like what you're talking about.@@AquilaeYT
Having a 240Hz OLED I still yearn for the beautiful motion clarity I got from my Acer IPS 120hz monitor... And I don't even play any competitive games. Better motion clarity just makes the games look much better
You can’t be serious… Not a single IPS can manage motion clarity like TN or OLED. I don’t believe you have a 240hz OLED. You must be mistaken and confusing motion blur for motion clarity…
@@SwampyF4RT Motion clarity is just the inverse of motion blur, with some overshoot artifacts added. My OLED has almost no overshoot, but it has a lot of persistence blur => bad motion clarity
The fact that they released yet another 240hz panel and have the cheek to charge even more than the last one from years ago should tell people all they need to know about zowie
I would just get an OLED at this point. 360Hz at 1440p is doable. Only downside is that when you decide to play at a tournament, they'll downgrade you to a Zowie.
BenQ has been very overpriced for the last few years. And they still keep going worse.
@@keestojuusto6072 Seems their strategy is to be the main e-sports monitor sponsor, having their monitors be used on every tournament and then cashing in on the pros wanting a consistent experience at home and at the tournament.
@@michalsvihla1403I believe there is a 1440p 480hz oled panel in the pipeline by LG.
@@keestojuusto6072 benq was good in past where there were no good monitor out there.. now they are just refreshing monitors with better dyac but input lag is terrible for small monitor.
Would've been good to have a Dyac 1 vs Dyac 2 visual comparison. Especially considering no reviewer that I've seen thus far has been able to actually demonstrate the value in Dyac 2, and since Zowie are delusional enough to think that the change from Dyac 1 to Dyac 2 is worthy of a $100 USD price increase, a greater focus on that would be appreciated. Good video as always, weird product though.
I got this monitor and had to return after 10 min of gameplay, paying 450$ with discount to get a defect unit.
In the center with dark pixels and Im glad I returned it. I dont know what is happening with zowie but all products I buy from them Its been complete trash.
Only good product I had from zowie was like 5+ years ago with the EC2-A that still works and have less qc than brand new ec2-c copies I had.
Another thing to keep in mind Dyac+ 2 or whatever will look good on blurbusters blur test or marketing zowie videos because in game is not that much of a diference.
I have to agree with you and the comments paying full price on this specs is like buying apple products, 90% ppl using "professional" grade products will never make it pro level, better off enjoying better image quality than tryhard in games for nothing.
Also even if you buy this there is still a chance to get defect monitor or dead pixels and good luck for the hassle to return it and live with it.
i feel like most of the people watching this aren't competitve gamers, i want the best experience playing cs and the least amount of hardware bottlenecking my ability to play well.
1080p, 240hz is plenty enough for a high level (faceit level 10) cs player, and my computer only pushed 300 or so fps on average at 1080, i don't want some expensive oled that first doesn't come in the 1080p resolution and not in a 24" size combined. I know that if i was to get an oled i would spend maybe double the price of this since i would also need to get a better gpu to be even able to push enough fps at the higher resolution. As i found it's not really that good to set custom resolutions significantly lower than the monitor (so 1080p native a 720p custom res would still look ok, but from a 2k native a 720p res would be not that great, which i have tested)
The price for it is already about 375-450€ here. Just looks like another way too high MSRP to sell older models or make discounts look better
Nope. TIme to get OLED. $500 is beyond absurd for this.
Current OLEDs, without BFI, don't do anything to combat persistence blur caused by sample and hold. They are worse in motion than any monitor with BFI or backlight strobing. We need to push manufacturers to include BFI on their OLEDs too for motion clarity's sake
BFI is better than OLED still but at $500 I agree. Only thing going for it is its 24.5" size which OLED doesn't offer.
@@AnimeUniverseDE Have you actually seen an OLED monitor? 240 Hz has VERY good motion clarity and BFI is largely irrelevant at that refresh rate. Even 120 Hz looks great. BFI is fine if you are stuck at 60. I'm glad that ASUS included it in there QD-OLED, but using it comes at the cost of VRR and HDR. Still its fine for a game that you can run at a locked 120 fps, but can't hit 240 and that's a maybe.
240 no BFI >>> 120 w/BFI
@@rickgear2579Yeah, but wake me up when we'll get 500hz OLED with BFI at those 500Hz
@@rickgear2579 yes I have the C2 and have seen by how much BFI improves things. The C2 can use BFI at 60hz and while it flickers a bit at that refresh the motion is even clearer than at 120hz without BFI. It is really incredible, with BFI. Which is why I advocate for its inclusion
What a lot of people really want right now are 24" OLED monitors. We left the TN dark age a long time ago and yet they're still making this garbage
I'm still waiting for a 25 inch 144hz 1080P OLED for $300. A boy can dream haha.
@@kotztotz3530 I'd be happy to pay $500 for that, damn.
Out of curiosity why 24"? Is it for better pixel density? I ask this because i currently run a 27" 1440p monitor, it's over 5 years old and looking to upgrade to something around €400. My current monitor has a gsync module and I moved to an AMD gpu so i can't use VRR.
you do not need 24 inch to be good you can game at 34 inch and playing good.. Small monitor your face needs to be on monitor.. bigger monitor your head is in normal position. YOu need to try and see.. Best is 27 inch no matter what.
@@FROSTB4NE Simply put, I want a smaller screen because I find them more comfortable to use and they take up less space. I won't have to move my eyes as much.
Yeah but where is the 5800x3D comparison?
This totally would have been a very good comparison and in the same price range. HU missing the point
Best comment of the day.
$500 TN panel in 2024. No way this is a hard pass!
Hardware vendors are doing head shots all the way to the bank😂.
500$ for a IPS which have less than 50% of refresh compliance, a tons of overshoot, just imagine buying that sh*t.
@@AquilaeYT what's that
@@AquilaeYT what's that
@AquilaeYT what's that
$999 for a TN panel in 2024??????
It is 500 but still.
Still too expensive. 300 USD is a good price
Especially for such a small screen...
@@НААТ Not everyone has 1/20 eyesight gramps.
Give me a 24" OLED already.
But how would they pay for sponsoring every esports event
Especially for a TN panel. *_shudder_*
NO MORE THEN 250$ IN 2024 FOR TN!
Leave it to little oled cultits to bring their dump obsession to superior- competitive gaming focused- options..OMG!!! I AM JUST GET A 32-48 INCH 4K OLED instead!!!OMG!!!
just get a crt monitor and thanks me later
So 1080p 240hz worths 500 usd nowadays? woooow
TN panel for 1k LOL. Zowei is living in 2015, wake up Zowei it's 2024, now there is a panel called Oled.
Tell OLED makers to make a competitive monitor then.
@@griffin1366some pros use them so they can't be that bad
@@griffin1366 Dude, I would beat you in any game with 5e worth Genius mouse and 75hz monitor and sub 100 fps. Muh competitive lol. This monitor is worse than other cheaper TNs despite the marketing gimmick Dyac. They should rename it to D1ck'ya:D :D
@@griffin1366the dual mode LG is more than sufficient for programing. anyone who'd blame their monitor on that is coping and looking for a crutch
@@theSato Nobody is blaming their monitor...
And the dual mode is blurry / 32"...
I think there is still a good place for monitors like these, as a secondary display that you only use as a primary display when playing games you want maximum motion clarity performance in; but not at $500, or even $400.
300 neither
at this point theryre just scamming the idiots actually considering buying this xD
If you are a CS1.6 player and have used a CRT monitor
this TN240hz will make you feel like you are using a CRT ONLY 80hz~90hz
This is LCD
I got a new 27inch 240Hz IPS Alienware monitor for about $300 like 3 years ago...
Yikes!!!
I would need to have my brain removed to pay anything over $300 for a TN panel in 2024. And that's pushing it at the high end. Particularly with high refresh rate 1440p IPS monitors that can match response times, and the increasingly available OLED models as well which have response times that beat it.
Where’s the Viewsonic xg2536 review 280hz
OK wait wait, hold up... is BenQ living in a vacuum? You can purchase a KTC G27P6 QHD 240Hz OLED monitor for $552 today. How delusional does the pricing team in BenQ need to be to price this 1080p 240Hz TN monitor at $500?? Damn!
BenQ thinks they are Texas Instruments with their Ti-84.
Second 😊
At the same time OLED 240Hz starting from ~600$... who tf need this now.
There are no 24" OLED panels on the market.
Which OLED has BFI currently?
Aorus and Asus models have 24 inch modes
pros
After 2 years u can throw this OLED to garbage :)
Yeah while fast monitors, these are now very prices when OLEDs are releasing. But new OLED monitors need to start releasing with BFI though. With VRR. I wouldn't be surprised for LCDs to really fall in price once more OLEDs get released. Just lately there was a 4K 1000Hz demo monitor, oddly it was using LCD but I expect consumer OLED 1080p 1000Hz as 4K 240Hz DFR mode.
Please review acer x34 v3, the new miniled ultrawide perfect for people afraid of qd oled burn in.
Edit: at this point I won't make any buying decision before seeing your review. Monitorunboxed ftw.
Have they even looked at the market this year? DOA
This monitor should not cost no more than 250$
This monitor should not cost no more than 250$
VS OLED I feel this is far too expensive for a competing TN monitor.
oled just has way fewer weaknesses along with near instant pixel refresh times. My only complaint about oleds is there are no 24" panels, I find 27" just a bit too large.
@@dampintellect I find 32" almost too small 😀
You can change the FO32U2P (and also the asus) to 24" mode if needed
of course you guys exclude the Actual King of 1080p 240hz PureView Motion Clarity King - ViewSonic XG2431 and its for just 250$
still no HDMI VRR tests? I don't see this issue in your reviews being resolved any time soon... which means I don't see any value in the reviews tbh as this is a feature that I need to know about.
I'll unsubscribe for now, as this very easy to test and report on feature is simply ignored by your team
First!
First
Unfortunately no
Here's a cookie 🍪
No
Darn was hoping for the Gigabyte Oled review
an absolutely amazing monitor. I have the FO32U2P since 16th may and this monitor blows my mind out. Such a fantastic monitor. I love it so much 😍❤
Thought this year was all about 2k 360hz oleds. 240hz seems underwhelming for zowie
So if I am looking for the best fps gaming monitor to use with a Series X (120hz) that has the same or better motion blur reduction as Dyac 2, what monitor would you suggest? I want a size 24-25 inch monitor. Any help?
fo32u2p review？
I can tell beforehand:
an absolutely amazing monitor. I have the FO32U2P since 16th may and this monitor blows my mind out. Such a fantastic monitor. I love it so much 😍❤
It's like :
OLED : Too expensive + can potentially burn-in
TN : IT'S 2024, wake up samourai !
IPS : Overshoot + low refresh compliance + bad contrast
Help us 🤣
Buy an OLED. simple.
The OLED Care by the Gigabyte FO32U2P protects it from burn-in
@@De-M-oN Give me the money, that's simple.
Those "care" name are marketing lmao
@@AquilaeYT but it takes care. Thats what matters, right?
Gigabyte gives also 3years warranty - burnin included.
@@De-M-oN Like i said, it's marketing, if LG or anyone else will want to put a "care" logo, they can but it's useless and doesn't prove anything.
Anyway Gigabyte and good screen in the same sentence is a hard joke.
@@AquilaeYT The FO32U2P is right now the best of the new OLEDs. so not a joke at all.
Its also the only monitor offering DP2.1 UHBR20. So with future GPUs no DSC anymore.
The OLED Care function has all the features it needs. pixel shift, corner dim, and so on. Everything there. And seems well implemented too so that you dont really notice it. So what is your point? Why complain about something which does its job? The FO32U2P has also the highest Brightness of the new OLEDs.
The FO32U2P is an AMAZING monitor. Not sure what youre complaining about.
I have the FO32U2P and couldnt be more happy.
Is it worth switching from XL2546K to this????
I have had it for 3 years...
I wish the price for it was fair, almost 600 euros for it... they are nuts.
👍
people have to understand that these monitor's are only meant for competitive players and nothing else. These types of monitor's are not meant for casuals, budget ballers etc. Thats how they keep on getting away with these high prices cause competitive players dont care about oled they only want the best competitive advantage.
Did you miss the part where OLEDs kept shitting on this thing? Its response time is 10x higher. Doubt it has nearly as good motion clarity as a half decent OLED.
This screen is for broke, or uninformed, competitive players.
@@randomguydoes2901Oleds do not have backlight strobing yet. So they lose in motion clarity.
@@HopemanGGno they really don't. Keep coping 😂
@@grizzly6153 Why are you so convinced of that? What is your technical explanation? Have you ever experienced the best BFI tech?
@@HopemanGGpro players don’t use BFI or DyAc anyway lmaoo
I have the original XL2546 and the colors have always been total crap.
...so we dont get camper at Warzone anymore if they buy an oled monitor right?
I mean pros have to use them so fanboys will buy them and tbh motion clarity is really good.
Meanwhile, people are still waiting for your FO32U2P review.
Second!
165 must have a higher refresh latency 1000/165=12.2 ms. What am i missing?
Rocket League b-roll for a 240Hz e-sports monitor 😂
I wish they'd make a screen with a backlight array powerful enough to these kind of very short pulses at 100 hz with decent brightness.
A TN panel is 2024? Junk.
Does ULMB2 still require a Nvidia graphics card? If yes it's a huge no, go. Nvidia is less relevant in esports...especially for gamers on a budget who just want the more FPS per $, because that's what matters there...
nvidia cards (even older ones) are better for cs2 and many other games
Guys, I'm looking for a 360hz monitor, I'm not a professional gamer, but I like to take things seriously, the only game I have is CS2, please help me 🙏🏻
xl2566k or the alienware 500hz or 360hz
Can you review the aw 2523hf
I vomited when you said TN.
BenQ is trying to go bankrupt aren’t they
average to bad unless you like dyac 2, got it
I love how plain this monitor looks from the front. no distracting branding! Shame its incredibly outside of what I want for a monitor.
Agreed
Fat bezels are not a good look
@@grizzly6153silence, your opinion does not matter
@@grizzly6153 bro cares about asstehtiks
BenQ Zowie most overrated brand
You can get a Samsung 27” ips 240hz on sale for 250$
HDMI 2.1 or DP 1.4 ????
great video and monitor , its a pity games are pretty dull currently so its not worth upgrading anything
500$ is way too close to OLED monitors nowadays, this thing is beyond doa. In my eyes it's very clear that Benq is just making sure their monitors are used by CS pros and the unknowing audience will think they're what they need.
the xl2566k is still the best
With Coil Whine...
@@DVTHEFOX i had 5 of 66K and all had coil whine lmao, finally ppl's start to notice it, they didn't even care but this one doesn't have any coil whine.
Great review as always, not a monitor for me though.
test viewsonic monitors please
Are you planning a review of the BenQ ex321ux?
msi mag 274qrf-qd e2 review pls
The reason people are willing to pay the absurd price is because it supports 300 nits with strobing.
Other monitors could do it but they prefer not to take the chance because the LEDs require 4 times the voltage boost to accomplish this which can wear out the LEDs quickly.
BenQ doesn't care and is willing to take the risk
A person that has a skillset to actually use this monitor to a full advantage will not be looking at the price tag
you act like lower or middle class people are never good at videogames lol
@@theSatoYeah it was a really dumb comment that people coping about getting ripped off chose to like.
Zowie ewwww
If you really want Zowie 240hz for DYAC, there's a handful on eBay in the US refurbished for like $250-$275
Still not a monitor I'd ever buy, but I'd take the chance on the refurb for that price versus paying $500 for this holy moly.
thanks
BenQ pulled an Intel, and now the rest of the industry is pulling an AMD. Only difference is nobody cares if BenQ can make a comeback.
They can not... but people do not watch movies on youtube and they just buy again zowie.
I've been saying for years it is just marketing gimmick so I was right. They scammed you like Razer with their gaming headsets or keyboards. LOL. Benq is the new Razer, it is the same with their outdated mice without any sw cos muh latency. In fact, they use outdated TN panels and mice without sw support so they cheap out, don't have to support additional features and kids playing Fortnite and CS2 will purchase it.
Back in my days, I had 75hz, cheap 5 euro worth black/white genius mice which broke after one year and then I purchased new one. Now, I have Razer Viper Ultimate and RMAing it every year as much and get a new replacement. Previously I had Logitech G900, it developed a double click. RMAed, got G903 hero instead, again developed a double click after 6 months and any fps with ADS was then uplayable cos it randomly zoomed in and instatly unzoomed due to double click issue.
MY Corsair keyboard keeps breaking too so I am living on perpetuum mobile strategy, RMA the old stuff and use the money from the old one to purchase new stuff which will break within warranty period too, and repeat the cycle.
Not reading that essay
@@lavenderlolxd If you think that was an essay we found the reason behind your bad grades. No go tell mommy to buy you a different monitor, IPS or OLED.
@@madarab You're the closest thing humanity has to a 1:1 personification of Reddit. Congratulations! 🥳
@@lavenderlolxd reddit is yapping about the monitor so no, now go get your mom pursue get d1cky'd
but you can get a used Odyssey G7 for 400 or less. if thats your budget, do that. if you can spend more, go OLED
G7's have terrible QC issues, and if you're buying used you almost certainly don't get any kind of warranty or support. Not that Samsung support was good to begin with, but it's better than nothing.
Can the harping on viewing angles get any more tiresome? Seriously a non-issue for 99,9 % of the people sitting in front their computer.
It didn't even beat the Blurbuster 2.0 certified Viewsonic in motion clarity though
The viewsonic has a low brightness which not everyone is a fan of.
@@griffin1366 that is true. It still like $200 cheaper though
Hahaha the naive one, the XG2431 only beat the Zowie at 60hz and 120hz only with a custom resolution in CRU.
And it's garb*ge.
OLED master race for both productivity and gaming
Just need cheaper 4k 144hz OLED monitors
Not until there are 24" models.
Not yet at all lol. Burn is is way too prevalent for productivity still.
I use it for daily work and gaming 12hrs a day. At least 3khrs a year.
Oleds going to be burnt in after 2 years.
Aorus and Asus models have 24" modes, with OLED balcks you don't even notice the boarders
@@houssamalucad753 Not without comprimises. Give me native over that.
Still worse than ASUS. Fast IPS are still better.
People overestimate BFI and underestimate 360/480Hz OLEDS in motion. Both side by side look nearly identical.
but you wont get 400 fps in most games. That is where strobing is useful, as you get good clarity even at low fps.
Clearly !
they don't know what Crosstalk is.
Which monitors did you compare side by side? Reviews here have the UFO test which looks clearly much better with BFI.
Nope. OLED by itself does nothing to address persistence blur. You severely underestimate how important backlight strobing and BFI is, especially at lower refreshes.
@@HopemanGG Bored of people like you which trust that "UFO test" are a "absolute truth" methodology while it's not the case and don't reflect a real gameplay scenario.
Learn about crosstalk.
Old 1080p TN with 240fps + DYAC2 is 0.5ms blur and kills any OLED 1440p 240fps with 4.3ms blur at fast motion . That old TN is equvalent to 2000fps motion clarity. Like those proud 4K 240 OLED users when pixels are moving at 1000pixels/second speed they see 540p effective resolution its hard to explain to those people that 4K is only on static screens.
wut
@@FoxTheBrian it calls presistance blur something u cant show on YT video you must see it in person
Why wouldn't you go with an OLED monitor?
OLED's version of blacklight strobing is BFI. And that feature is limited right now. Sample and hold motion blur is real.
Because current OLEDs, without BFI, don't do anything to combat persistence blur caused by sample and hold. They are worse in motion than any monitor with BFI or backlight strobing. We need to push manufacturers to include BFI on their OLEDs too
@@AnimeUniverseDE Well, BFI is terrible for brightness and OLED are already on the weak side even with last generations vast improvements in this area
No 24" OLED displays.
@@emi5370I would use a less bright mode for the increased motion clarity. Give users the choice
3:36 That's why it would be cool to have variable response time. Like for example set from 30 to 70, which means that from 30fps to 240fps in games it changes from 30 to 70 response time. That way the response time could be always in the best settings you want, to never see too many overshoots or bluriness ghostiong with movement.
It's clearly time to retire TN panels, as clear as my old xl2546 is, which I've used for the past 6 years, they've completely dropped the ball with that asking price and panel tech. goodbye zowie, I've got a new 480hz oled, moneys well spent , and tbh,, I don't even miss using dyac, not even at lower refresh rates like 100~144hz where strobing still works flawlessly giving that crt-like experience.
I have a tons of things to say but before that, thank you for giving us some informations about screens, like always.
Well, first, i found that your Response Time chart is a little bit weird if i compare with my experience with this screen, two month ago, i mean, that's not sound really credible but i have some things to say about that.
What i found weird is the high/premium OD performance in terms of response time and Refresh Compliance, how that can be so bad while i've used these two mode while i've tested this screen and it feels super smooth and instantly ? (did you try to redo these test or this is a one shot test ?)
I found that very weird because some screen (240hz) that you tested with a "better" response time just doesn't feel like the chart in terms of responsiveness so i think there will be some "error" or things to take in consideration, in addition it is weird while we know that OSRTT tool and stuff like that are generally very accurate.
It's very interesting tho, also custom OD 17 (your settings) compared to my custom OD 17 (the same) doesn't feel like 8.2% of overshoot but a little bit more, while 8.2% is green (so it's ok, you won't notice it) it is in reality not the case in my experience at 240fps constantly, anyway, hugely dissapointed about how the screen managed so bad the Refresh Compliance by beign a 500 dollars TN panel with only 77.3% (weirdly, this screen feels more smooth than some 85% IPS 240hz panel...so...yeahn i don't really understand.) anyway, this Zowie still have so much less overshoot than IPS competitor.
Also, some people will maybe prefer the XL2566K (360hz version) but in fact, this screen have a huge problem of Coil Whine at 360hz (i've had 4) while the XL2546X doesn't Coil Whine at all.
So bad that the old XL2546K (K, not X) are not in the Best GtG Performance chart to compare the old and the new.
Things that you won't consider while testing : Comfort,Zowie are known to have a "perfect" stand with a "perfect" OSD, Black Equaliser performance are the best of the market and no one IPS panel can do that like Zowie, also Color Vibrancy etc
The Armada from HP looks better on paper but i'm pretty sure it's less comfortable and less good to play on this screen than on the BenQ.
About Strobing, i've made Alien Pursuit too about Ghosting and Crosstalk and we get similar results, so bad the screen is not compatible with Blur Buster Utility, like, wtf, the XL2546X have imho better strobing performance than the XL2586X💀and the Asus is the best, Zowie today really become dissapointing.
just got my XG27ACS like 3hrs ago......is there any plastic that will peel from the lcd?
If u blink with your eyes fast enough u can simulate backlight strobing on your OLEDs 😂 U can even buy strobbing glasses
1080p in 2024 is nonsense
setting ur own overdrive setting is do sick but thus monitor is pretty terrible for the price lmao
XG249CM is far better and the BFI mode is better IMO as well. Half the price too.
🤣
Since my setup is a single monitor desktop, OLED is a definitive NO. The burning issue is inacceptable.
there is no burn in.. new oled have anti burn in software when you use to max settings it turns off after 4 hours and clear the image.
@@MakeSh00t Tim said otherwise.
@@Ralipsi he did not turn to the max settings he uses in normal... Because people do not want to have clear image when monitor needs it they have on 12 hours nonstop.
Always liked Zowie's strobing tech but do any actual esport players actually use it? I doubt it.
Those monitor companies don't seem to understand that strobing is more useful at lower framerates, it's better for AAA or retrogaming if anything since it makes 60fps looks like 130+fps. If you run a game at 240fps already sure you get even more clarity from the bfi but it's honestly clear enough without. In fact bfi/strobing could increase input lag slightly so serious players would actively turn it off to be sure.
Yup we need OLEDs to support BFI. Perfect blacks plus insane motion clarity would be awesome
If zowie made a 1440p monitor, id buy asap. I went with the Benq Ex270qm, which is 1440p 240hz and I love it. I still think oled is not worth it
Good luck with this screen, if you play Osu! and you want to play at 1080p fullscreen, your screen will never be at 240hz 🤣💀
I get 240fps constant in fallout 76, 600+ in cs2 and overwatch, and if anything I just turn gsync on for other titles. i have a 4070ti super @@AquilaeYT
@@C0nnie You don't understand, i don't talk about the performance of the screen or anything like that.
I talk about a bug that ALL EX270QM have :
When you want to play on 1080p fullscreen, this screen lock the refresh rate at 120hz.
If you are naive you won't notice it, so you want the proof ? ok > turn On G-Sync, play at 1080p fullscreen and see the magic stuff appears : a beautiful 1440p screen which show you a cr*p 120hz lock, like, wtf.
never heard of this, never experienced this lol. I have everything running natively at 1440p 240hz. I did uninstall the 4k stuff from nvidia though, which sounds more like what you're talking about.@@AquilaeYT
Having a 240Hz OLED I still yearn for the beautiful motion clarity I got from my Acer IPS 120hz monitor... And I don't even play any competitive games. Better motion clarity just makes the games look much better
You can’t be serious… Not a single IPS can manage motion clarity like TN or OLED. I don’t believe you have a 240hz OLED. You must be mistaken and confusing motion blur for motion clarity…
@@SwampyF4RT Motion clarity is just the inverse of motion blur, with some overshoot artifacts added. My OLED has almost no overshoot, but it has a lot of persistence blur => bad motion clarity