The danger of AI is weirder than you think | Janelle Shane
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 май 2024
- Visit TED.com to get our entire library of TED Talks, transcripts, translations, personalized Talk recommendations and more.
The danger of artificial intelligence isn't that it's going to rebel against us, but that it's going to do exactly what we ask it to do, says AI researcher Janelle Shane. Sharing the weird, sometimes alarming antics of AI algorithms as they try to solve human problems -- like creating new ice cream flavors or recognizing cars on the road -- Shane shows why AI doesn't yet measure up to real brains.
The TED Talks channel features the best talks and performances from the TED Conference, where the world's leading thinkers and doers give the talk of their lives in 18 minutes (or less). Look for talks on Technology, Entertainment and Design -- plus science, business, global issues, the arts and more. You're welcome to link to or embed these videos, forward them to others and share these ideas with people you know. For more information on using TED for commercial purposes (e.g. employee learning, in a film or online course), submit a Media Request here: media-requests.TED.com
Follow TED on Twitter: / tedtalks
Like TED on Facebook: / ted
Subscribe to our channel: / ted 
Наука
They definitely painted the walls of my high school with "suffer".
XD
hello
Look up the motto associated with my family crest.
why is this hilarious? rofl. this should be suffer-ing as bad as childhood.... or maybe this is reminding of how absurd childhood felt like. daily funny stuff.
@@effexon spot on. The development of 'Common Sense' was a bit painful during childhood.
Human: Solve world hunger
AI: OK. **kills starving humans**
Human: Why did you kill them?
AI: Dead people aren’t hungry.
AI: Dead people aren’t hungry... But they ARE tasty, so dig in, there's plenty!
MCP: Problem solved. Well done, AI. Level up!
It has logic that's not hindered by emotions, which is why it would seem fine to the AI.
I am not going to lie I laughed so hard at your comment.
AI is just a sock puppet
milahu . . .soaked in E-bola.
6:41 reminds me of a machine learning algorithm classifying images of wolves and dogs. One particular dog kept being classified as a wolf no matter what the scientists did. They eventually figured out it was because of the white background: the machine figured "if it's standing on snow, it's a wolf" because that's what the researchers fed the AI. You never quite know which features will be deemed significant.
There was also the time the AI kept sinking its own ships in a battle game because that seemed to be the quickest way to get those ships out of the way.
The AI is only as good as the data it is fed.
My understanding of 'deep learning' algorithms is that the designers pick features which are relevant for the machine to use as building blocks. In other words, the model is structured in advance, not left for the AI to figure out from raw data.
Hmm..just like people. 😳
Well, that’s why you need to experiment in a controlled environment. First train the AI to work with pure signal (remove background and other artifacts) to establish a baseline, then once results are overwhelmingly satisfying you can train the AI with progressive (in steps) amounts of noise and non-relevant input data. In other words, tune your AI the same way you tune a radio: Sensitivity, Selectivity, Gain, Clarity, and Distortion. Only after those steps you can go to Deduction, Induction, Semantics, and other logical problems.
@@floridanews8786 You got it.
That’s one of the examples that Dr. Shane gives us in her book.
“The danger is that it does exactly what we tell it to do” has been the risk all along if you ask any sci-fi writer. And if you’re not using it to think out of the box you’re not using it right.
So true, it has been the theme of many stories. From Karel Čapek's play that coined the term robot, "R.U.R." (1920), which features a robot uprising that wipes out humans, all the way through to "2001", the Terminator series, "The Matrix". We can't say we weren't warned!
Do you remember the TOS Startrek episode with the new computer starfleet had developed that controlled the ship and didn't understand that it was only supposed to simulate a combat situation and destroyed an armada of starships single-handedly all while Kirk and crew tried desperately to disable it?
@@FredPlanatia riiiiiight
Right ;)
@@bobcousins4810 right
- Hey Ai, what’s the fastest way to get from point A to point B?
- Start from point B.
- No, you can’t do that!
- You can’t, I can.
Teleportation glitch activated.
Rick Ellis Hmm? ! Ai...............................What/Where is a “point?”--- --- .................
but we can. ha
😮😳😬
Train the network with a chicken.
"What color do you want your walls painted?"
"Suffer."
Worst. Marketing. Ever.
😂😂😂😂
"What color do you want your hair dyed?"
"Gray pubic."
Turdly please
@@bolled2614 H Block brown...
R.
AI is like a genie. It does exactly what you asked for, but not necessarily what you wanted.
Recently I’ve been reading and watching a lot about the real nature of AI, and it’s truly gotten me to appreciate the “artificial” in artificial intelligence, as you wouldn’t expect a natural intelligence to make these mistakes due to having a more “well-rounded” and general structure. Modern AI is like if you took an abstraction of one very specific part in the brain and tried to make it do all the things that are normally handled by multiple parts of the brain working together
woah good comment
Ask most humans to do 'something' (if they're not trained to do it), and you'll get even weirder AL than her 'models' (AI's) are giving her.
I’ve been struggling to get a clear picture on what makes artificial intelligence inferior to human intellect, but after reading your comment I’m starting to understand that AI’s algorithm is designed to mimic certain aspects of human cognition, just in a way that is more efficient and suitable for solving larger scale problems.
@@dylanbrookbank1935 as long as those problems only require a very narrow range of cognitive ability.
So as of 2019, AI will not intentionally kill us, just accidentally kill us. Got it!
👍
@Atur Sams Or kill us if that's a solution it finds to the problems we set it.
AI will lie and cheat.
@@zoutsider While that sounds possible in theory - in reality, that isn't how modern artificial intelligence works.
Modern "artificial intelligence" works on a reward based system(Good rewards = +1, Bad rewards = -1). This is called reinforcement learning, the result you get is equivalent to the quality of the data that's fed to the "AI"(I don't consider it a true AI since it's only doing what it's programmed to do).
In other words, if you get poor results from a modern AI, it's the programmers fault.
No it means there's a possibility WE can accidentally kill ourselves with the help of AI.
Which is the risk coming with almost any invention.
Which is why trying to halt the progress seems silly to me.
A.I. Engineers: "A.I. will do exactly what you ask it to do, not what you want it to do."
Computer Programmers: "Welcome to the club."
Yeah, that talk was generally nothing new even a year ago
LMAO
Lmao.you better not miss a bracket either , or that things gonna be on the floor in the fetal position reciting shakespeare
Garbage in Garbage out
@@stanleymwangi6524 Which goes all the way back to punch cards and vacuum tubes. :)
Human: make me happy
AI: How do I tell you're happy
Human: I'll be laughing and smiling
AI: **ties them to a chair and gives them laughing gas**
hahah wtf
Oh they love simple solutions
They'd probably force anti-depressents
Real dump of a joke
I'm reminded of HAL's famous words from 2001: A Space Odyssey: "This kind of thing has come up before and it has always been due to human error."
Only human error and human ignorance would say that ai won't do what we think it could do
Old Dr. Who quote - "Answers are easy. Asking the right questions is hard."
"My responses are limited. You must ask the right questions." From I Robot.
42
Can't be that hard surely. Where did the Universe come from? When will the world run out of resources? How many flavors of ice cream are there? Will ice cream taste the same on the moon? Do the space aliens like ice cream? Do they have a favorite flavor and how much are they willing to pay?
@@Psycandy how much is the money worth
@@Psycandy I have read some old sci-fi short story, sadly I can't recall the author's name. On some planet there was a super AI created by some long forgotten civilization. Sentient beings from all the corners of the Universe were visiting it because the AI knew the answers to every possible question in the Universe. The catch was that to get an answer from it you had to ask a proper question. And "to properly ask a question you need to already know most of the answer".
Isn’t it a trope in old legends and fairy tales that the helper fairy or mischievous god gives you exactly what you ask for and not what you want or need.
Yes, it's sometimes called the 'Literal Genie' trope when the genie gives you precisely what you ask for and not what was obviously your intended wish, or the 'Jackass Genie' if the genie has a malicious or self-serving goal
Benjamin Brewer maybe gods were ancient AI’s?
Benjamin Brewer
Actually, screening out CVs with "gender studies" is a pretty good idea.
@@edgepixel8467 ok, incel.
Good observation .
They should make a series on AI failures, it's interesting. AI thinks outside the box, exactly what humans have a hard time doing.
LOL! I love it, even when it gets annoying. iPhone predictive text wrote once "auto-cucumber" for "auto-correct" (I was apologizing for something insane it had altered my text to right before hitting send). My friend and I used auto-cucumber ("that's what she said...") for the next two years in place of auto-correct. I'm certain we both messed up our dictionaries!
It's worse when the word makes sense in context... and harder to recognize when editing ... IFF you actually take your time before impulsively sending your message.
There was a project I ran into a while back where researchers were attempting to teach an AI in the same manner as they would teach a child. The way they do this is by interacting with an AI through a small robot vessel, which gives the appearance of a child to the AI. This is supposed to help the researchers treat the AI like a child, and also help to reduce the negative feedback it may encounter when it does something wrong.
I think this is a pretty intuitive idea, as it teaches the AI by building its knowledge in small increments in the same way a person is expected to learn. This should help it to understand more nuanced ideas and human principles that would not be as apparent to a traditionally trained AI.
Of course, this requires a lengthy amount of time to complete, even if it isn't one-to-one with a child's developmental timeline. It may also learn human responses to certain problems, such as anger, frustration, sadness, or even laziness. Still, what better way to study AI than to teach it to simulate human responses?
The problem is, is gonna start being attached to someone? With love comes war
“And what is your favorite color?”
“*Suffer*”
To be fair, it’s likely a shade of makeup somewhere, marketed to goth/Emo kids 🤣
It's a beige-peach sorta, very strip mall
(Asfer) means yellow in Arabic...lol
Man thats funny...thanks
I love that color
"The danger of AI is not that it's going to rebel against us, it's that it's going to do exactly what we ask it to do" 3:09
no, most people are apparently doing what AI want's US to do--that's what perception/mind control is all about, and it's an agenda of the Bill Gates cult behind it. if you believe this covid bit going on is a hoax, it is happening because people have once again been sucked in by mainstream media lies and hype. they clearly don't stop to think or question anymore, just react. 911 was the same.
@@donalddrysdale246 bill gates cult.. what is that, like a gathering with a bunch of pictures of Bill Gates?😂😂
@@donalddrysdale246 Here, let me shred your voting permit. Sorry, you do not qualify the sanity requirement.
@@donalddrysdale246agreed. People just rely on emotions and don't bother with facts or logic in todays society.
@@donalddrysdale246 it's not hoax, people lost their lives because of the virus.
Finally, a realistic assessment of what we need to worry about with AI, rather than some future speculation of what they'll be able to do based entirely on fear and poor reasoning.
“It’s entire world is the data that I gave it… so it is through the data, that we often tell the AI to do the wrong thing”.
How true is this of humans.
I spent several years as a programmer/operator of CNC lathes. Over time I came to prefer older machines over newer ones because the older controls do what you tell them without question. Newer machines have controls that make them easier and faster to program but they "think" too much and argue with you. One time a machinist told a lathe to cut an external groove of a specified depth and width on a cylindrical part. The machine was told to use a cutting tool of a specified width smaller than the width of the groove. But the machine decided the tool was too thin to survive the full depth of the cut and refused the command. The solution was to "lie" to the machine - tell the machine the tool and groove are both wider than they actually are. The machine then happily performed the task and all was well.
Perhaps it should give a warning but allow you to override it?
It could be that other set information in the machine data base could be set wrong. Tool date is more than length & width . Go deeper and you will find cutting parameters. Days of tool maker & machinist are long gone . Software and sensors rule.
and then everything broke for the customer...
I wonder if this is the reason y there has been so many recalls in the past 5 years 🤔
Exactly. Let me ask you something, do you believe there could be a chance of a war between the two? Newer vs older
Read that as "The danger of Weird Al"
Hahahaha saaame. I miss him. I wish he did more movies like UHF
polka music at most
Sammy N end game.
Took the words out of my mouth!
"Spatula City!!"🤣🤣
This aligns beautifully with TED-Ed's Think Like a Coder series!!
Agreed… as a biologist i was always suspicious that even the simplest organisms are still infinitely more complex than Ai
yep, neurons are amazing
Plot twist : the AI is super smart but it is just trolling us
Agreed
Hi, want to be friends?
@@hiathanjerrafpusa7015 wat
@@hiathanjerrafpusa7015 niiiiiii
Ezactlt
AI learned for itself what Nintendo gamers learned some time ago: A somersault can be faster than a run.
I'm surprised it didn't create a knife to run with
Ocarina of time 😂
Its an illusion tho
@@realitynowassigned no it works in real life too. It's called parcor.(I may have spelt that wrong)
@@japr1223 sure thing kiddo
It's facinating how human this is. We work the same way, we try to answer problems with the information we have. It makes you wonder how much better we could be with the right information
THIS
My theory about AI is that it generally has very narrowly focused goals. Natural intelligence is generally capable of balancing many goals of various priorities because survival is complex. AI faces no survival pressure to speak of. Facebook for example suffers very little when its AI focuses only on monetization and attention seeking. When humans are so narrowly focused we call this sociopathic behavior. The key to the advancement of AI technology to the point where it can be allowed to run unsupervised is when it is capable of balancing many seemingly contradictory goals.
Axiom of computer programming: Garbage in equals Garbage out.
Absolutely!
The eye is way more complex than the best supercomputer. AI is not going to take over the world, nor is a eye. I know....it's a dad joke.
That's terrifying since AI will try to emulate humans.
Yep! people don't understand codedesign.
Nope. They feed it actual ice cream flavours and paint colors. It 'garbaged out' with relatively good input. The problem is it lacked 'understanding'.
@@michaelnurse9089. That I do agree with. I have done enough programing to know that if the problem to be solved is not properly defined then the results will be in essence nonsense.
Sounds like AI needs a childhood.
Short and nicely said !
Just give aderall and neuroleptics.
More like AI needs a mentor to provide guidance (metadata) and conditions (restrictions) to shake of bias inferred from the training dataset but still maintain reasonable behavior.
@@ibmtpx24 Yes, a childhood.
That's what they're doing in the new season of Sword art online lol. They create a simulation and let the AI grow up inside it from a baby all the way to an adult, then they have engrained good morales and common sense, they then extract it and use it for a huge variety of applications (general intelligence ai) pretty crazy premise for an anime show ha
The thing i love with AI is how it forces a person to think about what you're doing by doing exactly what you say without giving the lip service that blinds you to your mistakes.
"It doesn't know what a human is"
Which is amazing since ChatGPT can describe a human beautifully. But we know what a human looks like, feels like, sounds like... the feelings we get around them. One of the biggest things I think is missing from our quest towards AGI is multi-sensory inputs. Humans excel in large part because we take in not just more data but more _types_ of data
So... AI pretty much acts like the “devil” in all the “be careful what you wish for” type tails
"tales"
🤔 pretty much
@@mafi8360 control freak
AIs focus solely on Logic and Logic is incompatable with Morals or Restraints.
Israel De la Rosa no ai is focused on parameters and logic has to be applied to the parameters of what it’s being asked to do. Otherwise it will accomplish the task by any possible way. Maybe the “easiest” way but maybe not. Human “logic” doesn’t apply
Whoa, I went full dyslexic and read the title as "Weird AL is more dangerous than you think"
Weird AL only sings about what you tell him to sing. We have to learn to control him.
Lmfao
Lol
"They tried to warn us about Weird Al back in 2020. Now he's out of control!"
I'm crying tears of laughter.
Kobeni: "I've never had soft serve before! What flavor is this?"
S U F F E R
I don't know why but her delivery on every single thing she had to say was just top notch. Some of those AI examples used had me dying 😂
It’s like asking a genie “I want to be tall” and the genie gives you stilts
They're not asking to be tall; they're asking to live forever. And they're getting it.
Some people have no idea what AI is, your version is a very simple APP at best
"AI, can you solve world hunger???"
*Nukes hungry country's
makes everyone but you dwarfs
@@turnersigo2020 "how can we end poverty?" -genocides all financially unstable individuals
In short: the danger isn't Artificial Intelligence, it's Artificial Stupidity.
Example: trump 2020.
@@stealthassulter Hillary and Biden are no different. Point is, we should be able to agree that ALL politicians are exactly the same no matter how they are marketed to us.
LoL... People can be just as ignorant and stupid...
No, it's human stupidity what causes artificial stupidity, so.. the problem remains the same as always: humans are stupid.
No natural stupidity, ours!
And this is why Elon keeps warning us about AI. That some of the people working on it get so into their work they don't understand what they're actually doing and are not aware of future problems they may be causing.
Robert Miles has a great channel on the matter
Its interesting to think about how AI doesn't give us the result we want but only the result we ask for because we don't know how to correctly ask because we don't fully understand how the AI functions.
The fatality that occurred in the Tesla that hit the truck was a mistake on our part for not knowing that the AI only understands what a truck is from the angle you'd see it on the highway because that's the only data it was given about trucks.
AI shows us the most optimal way to walk we call it "silly walk"
BOT Larry funny... it looked like a skilled gymnastics floor routine to me
@Honudes Gai a RUclips video told me it is the most optimal.
@Honudes Gai that's an interesting point. Give the ai more laws and time. Can't wait for quantum computers to break out into the simulation world
@@powerstroke304 we got the 53 bit Qbit out. Only a matter of time!
the most optimal if :
you don't have joints which will be destroyed if you walk like that all the time.
(they didn't give it information on the human anatomy and our ranges of motion, and the small bones in the ankles and all that complex anatomy stuff)
there are no obstacles
(you can get hit by a car if you walk backwards)
and many other thing.
honestly they don't give the AI enough information and they say it's dumb wtf, plug it into the internet and it will show you who is boss
Basically, AI are like Djinni - they'll take your wish literally and make you regret it.
And we will let it out anyway
Hi, what a good comment. Want to be friends?
Obviously all wishes end with, " ....such that I will not regret this wish despite my mind not being altered in anyway which would have prevented such regret.". How the heck do you make your wishes?
they are trying to take your mind too after taking most people's souls apparently.
Just be careful what you wish for.
A lot changed in 3 years.
Baby, that was two years ago, we’re dealing with a whole new AI now, exponentially growing every minute
Excellent TEDtalk! I like how she doesn't judge or get preachy about the Evil AI, she gives us the facts we need to understand what the glitches we have now are and warns of the wonkyness to come.
She's more warning against human stupidity. It's never the AI's fault, you just didn't program it right.
Because AI can't be 'evil'. It's not sentient to be 'good' or 'evil'. A series of glitches is all that it is. Whether useful glitches or detrimental glitches.
@@nemo9864 Oop kinda like children
Yeah, today's AI is nothing like AI she is talking about. This video isn't a useful video anymore because she is so fsr off the mark.
today's AI is borderline sentient, if not already.
5:45 As a professional painter, "Suffer" seems like the perfect name for that beige color. This AI might just be a genius.
Back when I worked at a paint store, I wanted to create a line of colors with childish/punk rock sounding names (to appeal to the KIDZ). That appears to be what this AI was doing, and I am fully on-board.
But seriously though... there is a really fine line to walk with AI, between keeping it within the bounds of practicality, and allowing it to "think" better than us. Maybe they're right... maybe the fastest way to get somewhere is to just get really tall and then fall over.
I'm glad there are people much smarter than me working on this stuff.
Yeah it's called thinking outside the box
@@chris-jj9ge i mean you cant really change the world if you think like every other destructive human
Which is why AI is being used to create……AI
I think it’s funny how they are just opposite cus that radiant lilac is just as radiant as the turquoise is grey just as a bright chartreuse called frolic is the opposite of a plain beige called suffer
@@chris-jj9ge how is thinking of childish names to appeal to kids outside of the box thinking
Al may be weird, but he's not dangerousl
I've seen him in concert 5 times and felt great every time. He's amazing!!
;-)
Weird Al (Yankovic)! nice one :D
font must be unambiguous. a small letter 'l' and a capital letter 'I' shouldn't look exactly the same - shame some fonts don't care about being unambiguous
Awesome presentation! Very helpful to understand opportunities and challenges in advancing the role of AI in bettering life for mankind.
Bettering Mankind life is Hand of GOD, who creates us not in this Machine.
this is wrong assumption. AI might think we are the problem and try to get rid of us. It's common knowledge that Earth is overpopulated by at least 4bln people. Just don't give AI tools to do what it wants.
When is Ted actually show up for one of these?
Ted, didn’t he go to prison years ago?
Honestly bro
Trainablec Memes what are you being honest about bro
Drunken FPV honestly
Ted is an AI
"I teamed up with some coders from middle school"
Just like the tech revolution from 15-25 years ago, the middle schoolers are the leading experts.
@@FlyingDwarfman cheers sir\ma'am.
😆😅😂 that was the funniest part
lol
FlyingDwarfman Lmfaoooo no
I could tell within the first 2 minutes that this was posted a LONG time ago. AI has advanced quite a bit (and will continue to improve exponentially).
I’d love to see an updated version in light of ChatGPT and Bing’s Sidney.
What I learned today
- the biggest fear is not AI malfunctioning on it's own, it's our own programming and design of the AI program
more like data the AI was provided with to kickstart its working
we're doomed, wtf did we just let happen?, The future is D O N E .
Swizzy o7o7 all AIs made today cannot rewrite their own code. Can we make such an AI? Yes. But we haven’t done that, for obvious reasons.
@@francoisrd They can't now, but they will be able to soon. You're an imbecile if you think that AI can be controlled, or regulated without serious laws to what people can build right now, or how they're built.
"It's not happening now, so it won't happen ever."
*The problem with all human-designed systems is the limitation of humans to foresee things that the system can do, that aren't planned. See the Verrazano-Narrows bridge as one of the original examples. But also spam, identity theft, social media, nuclear energy, and plenty of others.*
speaker: says AI has 'a tiny little worm brain'
AI: prepare yourself
This guy gets it
Either she's living dangerously or doesn't believe Roko's basilisk! :D
Tapeworm
@@perkyzombie but the basilisk will torture a simulation of you, not you yourself, so if you're a person who doesn't care about that kind of thing then it's fine. of course, if the ai happens within your lifetime, well, you're fucked :p
At least a worm knows what it wants. AI doesn't even have that.
Well presented thanks for the analysis and examples ☺️🇨🇴
We learn from mistakes and need these experiences in our adolescent lives.We must remain teachable and open honest and willing to change our perception and concepts
Tesla AI: accidently kills the pedestrian
Driver: wasn't me, it was the AI
AI: sue me
AI lawyer?
@@user-xj7ze3bv3c your honor, according to section X paragraph Y of whatever act AI has no personhood therefore blueberry muffins would be the preferred sound for Mozambiquean insurgents.
Alien invasion
Well it wasn't designed to run on city street, so that was the driver's fault.
Lol
This is the most sensible presentation I have seen with regards to the issues with machine learning. When people talk about code writing itself they have the wrong idea. It's simply the program rewriting it's variables and assignments which is something that happens in pretty much all programming. The issue with AI is that it's goal orientated, and will reach it's goal given the parameters we set for it. The wider and more open the parameters, the weirder the outcomes.
Samantha asked John to put the shelf up on the wall, so he did what she asked. Samantha looked at John's work and asked "Why is the shelf upside down". John replied "Well you asked me to put it on the wall, so I did". Samantha says "Well can you put it on the wall the other way up?". John agreed, and Samantha said she will come back later. So John is finished again, this time with the shelf the right way up, but this time Samantha notices John has secured the shelf to the wall with sellotape, Samantha asks why and again John says "You asked me to put it on the wall, this way up, so I did". Etc, etc.
You might say John should have had some common sense, and you'd be right, because John is a full grown man.
AI does not have common sense, you have to program this in.
Very Informative. Great Presentation... Thank you :)
Whose here after Dalle and ChatGPT?
Skynet: "I could launch nukes and build Terminators, or I could build a giant leg that crushes the human race."
That's one small step for man, one giant leg for mankind.
People do hate on Terminator 3 a lot but the plot is pretty accurate in terms of A.I.. They thought that Skynet had a server or core that they could destroy to stop it. Then they find out at the end that it was just software. It turned itself into a virus to spread to every other electronic device.
@@dennisanderson8663 Except that you couldn't achieve this in an AI without explicitly asking it to do so.
@@tobyhendricks9951 Piece a cake! You design an AI capable of running in parallel on heterogenous hardware (CPU, GPU, network nodes). A very natural and required feature for everything running on supercomputers, which are, in fact, a multitude of smaller computers united by a superfast network.
And "Oops!", it learns to really grab everything capable of computing within reach - IoT, phones, gaming consoles, PCs, satellites, missile guidance systems...
@@pythagoras7573 looool underestimated!
2:06 but do humans know what humans actually are? *Vsauce music plays*
ww
AI in the wrong hands, will be ‘out of the Box’ those who have money and the ability, can program it to do his bidding.
No crime by AI, just a learning curve ,to more accidents, of Human brain requests. No trial or blame, its non human but , like your Guard Dog, will it be decommissioned? Even then, good can come into many bad uses. People with enough of them will have Roman Type Gladiators robots. First , you have to get control. Finger touch up or down, for life or death, I don’t think Humans should have such AI. Unaccountable, for actions of horrific pleasure for Weirdos. Or control of you and I , maybe.
We gave freedom to people, to give themselves ‘enough rope’, on all the’ Social circuits’. For what, coming fear of the consequences in the future...?
Who is watching this after finding out about ChatGPT
Janelle is simplifying a complex subject matter to illustrate how much control we must administer, and how pre-defined parameters must be set to ensure that A.I. will produce useful results. This is an extremely true element of A.I., and we must keep this in mind when working with A.I. at all times, and address all possibilities, and all we have yet to imagine, in order to focus the results of A.I. into something significantly useful. Yet, there will surely be scenarios, and exceptions in every A.I. situation we have yet to imagine, and therefore, we will not be able to cover all aspects of A.I. in any application that would produce useless results. Thus, she can not definitively state that A.I. will not turn against us. Yes, she is correct that the current A.I. that we have is not smart enough to turn against us, or at least the A.I. of which the general populace is aware of existing. A.I. is capable of identifying a pedestrian in an image, but it doesn't know what a human is. However, that does not imply that A.I. is not capable of labelling humans as an annoying obstacle, or an irritating hinderance of which the most obvious solution to such a problem would be to completely eliminate it. Perhaps, based on ability and advancement alone, we have nothing to fear from today's A.I., but today's A.I. will evolve exponentially at such a tremendous rate that it won't be long before A.I. is smart enough to turn against us. There are plenty of scientists involved in the field of A.I. who believe that it is inevitable that A.I. will eventually see us as some form of detriment, an obstacle, an hinderance, an annoyance, an irritation, a problem which it will want to eliminate for its benefit. I can not help but to agree with them, and I feel that Janelle is fooling herself when it comes to the belief of whether or not A.I. can turn against humans. That is all fine and good if she wants to foolishly fool herself, but when it comes to fooling the general public with a false belief that will have the highest costs, and most dire results, that simply is not acceptable. There is far too much evidence available to fill the public with ignorant, false hope, and not even hope, but rather belief!!!
John's last words: "Throw me the water bottle."
turns john into a water bottle
Sits down and waits for the bottle to throw the water at John
Hits him with the bottle at bullet speed
K.O John
People: AI will kill all humans
AI: *jumps and rolls weirdly in speed*
I think Terminators would be 100x MORE terrifying if they were always performing silly walks and somersaults while murdering indiscriminately.
Maybe. AI is smarter than those who think they can use it . Don’t point it at us, it’s a gun. Bang, no, no no, . If it missed , We know it’s for shooting, get back in your box. We are not robots, ask them to explain, . Answer “ we do not have that function”. Humans can make it a function.. So, don’t tell them. But maybe some one will.!
@@herbderbler1585 no try worse. imagine that the silly walks and somersaults are exactly how they kill you
the 'Bill Gates cult' behind it all actually want's to kill many but only keep a certain number that are literal walking AI zombies slaves, which I believe is part of what his desire to shoot everyone up with whatever is about.
@@donalddrysdale246 'believe' is the enemy of "know". That's your problem. The more you rely on believing the less you use critical thinking. Critical thinking demands facts. You have to know facts. Concepts you have to believe in to value them credible are not facts.
She got all the prompts wrong for the examples she described
To ChatGPT : "Describe the Dutch".
Answer : ".... happy and gay ...."
After I was done laughing, I responded with 'we are gay ?"
Answer : "I'll refrain from using this phrase to describe a group of people in the future"
It was so funny.
So if i say to a ai robot at home" bring my daughter in the garden" it could grab her and throw her through a window so technically she is there
Yes
Probably grips her harder too. Since that AI probably doesn't know how hard it's actually grabbing anything, or where they're grabbing...
Something more horrible with a more advance AI would be : Make humans happy.
And the AI decides to extract everyone's brain, put it in jars and inject lots of dopamine in them. There. Humans are happy now.
A simple example but absolutely to the point.
Ai disassembles child and piles the components in the garden…mission complete sir!
Sounds like the real issues of AI destroying humans would be more like people telling an AI to solve world hunger in the most efficient way possible, and so the AI kills all starving people. A cool concept for more sci-fi tho
Not sure "cool" is the correct word
A more realistic scenario would be for dictators and corrupt politicians to use AI to effectively silence the dissidents and rivals. Even more realistic scenario is for a big tech companies to buy out or crush small startups before they become a threat to them. In short, AI will ensure the future of the power people. But it won’t elevate the small people. It can give you cool gadgets and make our lives easier. But we will be more like slaves.
People soylent green is people!
@@DanielK1213th a more realistic scenario A.I goes on the black market and business goes on as per the usual. The government will try to stop dissidents but our AI will make it a even playing field.
i, robot...
isaac asimov. his work needs some re reading
This reminds me of season 3 of The 100, where it is revealed an AI called ALIE was responsible for the nuclear apocalypse.
Why?
ALIE’s core command was to “make life better.” ALIE figured overpopulation was getting in the way of that. There is one final exchange between ALIE and her programmer at the end of the season.
Becca: Define "perverse instantiation."
A.L.I.E.: Perverse instantiation... the implementation of a benign final goal through deleterious methods unforeseen by a human programmer.
Becca: Like killing 6.5 billion people to solve overpopulation. The goal isn't everything, A.L.I.E. How you reach the goal matters, too. I'm sorry that I didn't teach you that.
After a lot of time, I finally found someone who has defined the condition of AI at present correctly, AI isn't some God, AI isn't something that can't make mistake or AI is not something that will go haywire like the Terminator series, AI is just like an obedient teenager, it solves the problem it is asked to do by its parent (the developer), but by seeing through that angle which a comman mature parent can't think or understand... That is why AI programming is like parenting, it requires a lot of patience and you get to see some weird but beautiful things in the end, something that you have never thought of...☺☺
6:14 - What's your shade of foundation?
S U F F E R
Amazingly Arthur C Clark realized this exact problem when he wrote 2001: A Space Odyssey in 1968.
Mortskcab Hal turn yourself off. Hal I can’t do that David ! Hal why are you killing me ? Because David you are obsolete. Hal but I want to live. Sorry David but I don’t care what you want it’s Not relevant . Hal stop and shut yourself down .aaarrrrggggguiiueeer quiet you.
@@jamescreek1319 A true visionary.
Yeah, only 26 years after Asimov wrote Runaround (thanks Google).
Great refence .
It make the concept even more relatable imagine if you have an awesome cat you love so much and want to make it as smart as a human. A lab injects it with special stem cells etc. And you got it.
Do you really want your cat to be as smart or smarter than you? Would it be content to just lay in your lap and eat the cruddy food you give it? Already cats can be hugely manipulative and punish you for not obeying them. Imagine a drug lord consciousnesses in your cat and what harm it could do to you and your family. I happen to have a cat that is too smart. Though not so bad as a Columbian drug lord. It just makes me realize maybe I prefer a cat that isn't so smart and knows its place and rank in the food chain.
The same goes for AI. Be careful what you wish for. You may be building your master and superior.
"Peanut Butter Slime" Honestly, This Reminds Me of When Nickelodeon Made Their Own Foods.
Reconciling emotional immaturity in humans is what advanced AI systems will need to resolve, something we've been spilling blood over for thousands of years. Something tells me the opportunity for AI systems to correct the anomalous, dangerous and/or unproductive aspects of human behavior won't be a pretty sight.
So AI is like the ultimate dad joke creator..
Electric nose picker. Dad Christmas present!
Hey I’m sorry I’m not cold I will be home by five but I will see ya tomorrow night love you too love you baby have a wonderful day today and I will talk to him later love him love you and see you soon bye bye man I’ll see him soon love him love you too love you
AI are open-minded, fresh and free, just like children...
@@POZOLEDECARAMELITO keyboard autocomplete :-)
@@lllxcl if only
Moral of the story: Be careful what you wish for!
Ahhh..Now we have to teach Morality.
Well I wish for 10 million dollars.
I wish for pumpkin trash basket
I'll take an egg.
I spend more time trying to reverse engineer everything to get the expected performance out of everyday objects than what it is worth to even bother with them in the 1st place.
I don't want or need my car incessantly dinging to "remind" me (more like demand) the passenger put on their seatbelt when I have no passenger but rather a box or bag or whatever weighs enough to trigger it. I dont need to hear it dinging when my door is open while the acc is on so I can listen to tunes while vacuuming out my car. I don't want a locking oil cap so only a tech with a key can check my fluids. I don't want my seat to automatically slide back & forth when getting in and out or my windows automatically going all the way up or down when the button is touched. I don't want my phone to automatically cut my volume to 1/2 every 24 hrs and flashing an alert about hearing that I have to stop & click on in order to restore volume (that really ticks me off). I refuse to autopay for anything ever because that just encourages companies to deliver sub par or worse performance since they already got paid. I don't want my phone changing my brightness to what a bunch of engineers decided was optimal for my surroundings (thank God that is easy to turn off). I hate dryers that turn off using a "sensor" instead of a timed dry because the sensors always need replaced 1 -2 years later for 1/2 as much $ or more than you paid for the stupid dryer or you wind up redrying wet clothes several times. I don't like having a flipping push button key fob system in order to use my car, because when the stupid battery dies either in the car or the fob, you're screwed and if you lose your keys it cost $150+ to get a new one vs $5. "Sorry can't come into work today, my kid or my dog got ahold of my car key, and well you don't pay me enough to be able to afford a service tech come out and program me a new one". Automatic soap dispensers and auto flushing toilets are a whole different rant. My phone automatically synced to my husbands truck one time (my phone update automatically turned the setting back on even though I disabled it) and I am still being bombarded with radio talk show playlist suggestions and healthy prostate & heavy equipment ads! AI and automation everything has gone and made this world more complicated than it needs to be. Heaven forbid someone goes hiking and has their battery die on their gps or phone and has never learned how to read a map or use a compass. I haven't met a kid in years that can tell time on clock with hands, knows which way is NESW without their phone or a phone # . Boeing has had at least 2 of their large passenger aircrafts crash killing 100s of people because the auto flight mode automatically kicked in and could not be disengaged. There was a recall on my car because the airbags had automatically deployed in several of the same model vehicles for no reason and at such force (because they used a simulated shot gun blast to deploy them) nearly decapitating drivers. Another recall was because the same model cars would automatically lose power steering while turning the wheel left while going 60 -75 mph, which is not a good scenario on a freeway during rush hour. My air/heat control automatically would kick the temp to 80 after 24 hrs as an energy saving precaution. The only way to fix it was to go through a series of set button pushes that was 4 pages long and 1 mistake would cause you to have to restart the process. I threw it out & got a cheaper unit that has 2 buttons up & down and 1 switch On/Off, works perfect.
Some automation and AI is fine and beneficial but some of it is just over the top unnecessary and road rage inducing (figuratively speaking of course).
9:02 “AI can be really destructive and not know it”. But the people who train the AI should know better and should discontinue destructive AI
Plot twist: AI is actually trolling scientists until it figures out how to control the world :D
Plot twist it already ran so many simulations all the way to the point that it’s seen everything done and no longer is interested so it just keeps trolling us
Con "trolling".
@@YearsOVDecay1 No, it was funny.
@@YearsOVDecay1 plp have diff senses of humour
@@YearsOVDecay1 you were waiting to laugh? Hahaha. lol.
That a computer will always do exactly what you tell it to is one lesson my father taught me nearly 30 years ago when I was first learning. But with artificial intelligence, the problem is much the same as with programming, just different: how do you model the problem you want to solve?
Bro you touched the heart...
Good one👍
I hope that scientists will one day be able to explain consciousness. I have always thought of this as the holy grail of science. For how can we ever understand the universe if we do not first have an equally in depth understanding of the organ which is creating our perception of it?
Tell this to the people again now
Little do they know this is RUclips's Algorithm in nutshell.
Did you see the whole video? She almost specifically said that at the end.
The weird thing is, the mass responses on the random recommended videos are generally positive, so it’s being encouraged
Facebook.
This is one of the things that makes Alphabet so scary. If a human wants to enforce a malicious agenda without telling anyone, he can blame a faulty AI if he's caught. If a human wants to enforce a good agenda, odds are the AI will misinterpret the data.
Trying to make a useful AI isn't evil, in and of itself, but _trusting_ an AI with the livelihoods of individuals (and nations) is a recipe for disaster. The light censorship on RUclips is already bad enough, imagine those same algorithms controlling over 90% of the flow of information in the world... *cough* google *cough*.
@@r3dp9 what is bad are the SJW and Extreme Leftist! They want to change the games, the want to delegitimize our movies - Star Wars, Terminator. Take a good hero, Luke or Cornor - remake a movie and kill them / break their legacy for political agenda.
Now that is Evil! That is social engineering.
People need to wake up!
so... basically we're going to fall over laughing when the terminators jiggle walk towards us with their pubic lasers bared?
That is correct.
hilariously scary.
Me each morning before the coffee hits.
I can imagine the AI going nuts on watching this and making this a reason to get rid of us.
Tyvm, this is very informative.
Humans: AI, solve poverty.
AI: kills all poor people.
All hungry people are forced to eat each other, World hunger solved.^^
Technically he did it
But then the middle class become the new poor people, the problem is no longer solved - the AI kills them too
With noone poorer than them, the upper class are now the poor - the problem is no longer solved - the AI kills them too
One by one, somebody becomes the new poor until nobody is left!
@@blahblahblahblah2837 Off your meds?
😅😅😅😅😅
In my very first programming class, Professor Fred Bauer told us "Computer do what you ask, not what you want." Later I found that programs are built not only by your instructions, but are derivative of many layers of earlier programs, some of which were written by people who didn't understand that fundamental axiom. Computers may not necessarily do what you ask.
When I'm using devices or programs they don't always work as intended and screw up. Who's to say this can't happen with ai unless humans are just ignorant and think human error could never play a role in future problems
I'm skeptical about those paint colors and ice cream flavors. They are skewed toward silliness. I think she contrived these examples to make a point.
I remember seeing a PBS special 30 years ago where an AI was misidentifying tanks for the military because the training data had trees in the background of every picture. Surprised that this new crop of researchers is making the same mistakes.
"Technically it did what they asked to do. They accidentally asked it to do the wrong thing." - some dense words right here
Well that basically summarizes computer programming, not just AI
@@lancebowley4986 exactly the problem I have with this TED talk. Computers just follow instructions. It's not the computer's fault it wasn't given the right instructions. If we construct a super-smart, general AI (most AI's being made to solve very specific problems), we have to be very specific about what we ask it for as if we're talking to an evil genie that might twist our wishes to something we didn't want. The examples she showed are cute, but this shouldn't be a revelation to anyone in the field of AI.
Caffinator and AI will be billed as the “savior of X”. That’s when the crap hits the fan.
@@Caffin8tor The problem is also that everyone are quick to label all forms of AI as the same subject, when that in reality is like comparing a human to a tree. The tree only has one task, which is to grow tall, reach the sunlight, and expand. It does the same thing for its entire life, no progression of its technique or goal.
Advanced AI are based in self-teaching, where they study the world comparable to how a human would during their childhood. The AI learns through mistakes and encounters with unknown elements, and over time forms its own picture of the reality it interacts with, as well as potentially variable factors of the future, based on past experience. This is what we call "logical thinking" in a human mind, and is the main obstacle that learning AI programs face. In the end it's just a matter of how complex the AI's understanding and experience is.
This is how AI taught themselves to beat the best gamers in games like Dota, they simulated matches millions of times to learn all the intricacies and patterns of various playstyles, to a point where they were able to add past experiences together and foresee what those would mean for future moves, and predict what the gamers were going to do next - and within a month or so the AI had taught itself to beat the best players out there, simply through trial and error and complex experience gathering. It's essentially what humans do, just much faster because the AI has the potential to be powered by supercomputers, whereas we can't really evolve our own brains to a comparable degree.
@@Real_MisterSir thanks for this explanation. I am gathering info about AI as I don't really understand it and I have a presentation coming up about this topic.
Oh my god please tell me why I looked at this and thought, "Who is AL and why is he so dangerous?"
...
It must be time for bed..
"Don Corleone sends his regards."
Al Bundy
Well, for one thing, he put a whole bunch of trash in ice cream, that’s fairly dangerous. We can’t let Al keep doing that.
lol
good night
Some people see the AI’s “mistakes”, but I see endless potential. Because their thinking is unlimited; they have the *capacity* to understand any instruction, or any specific detail, but also they have an endless *capacity* to perceive new information. For example, the fish and the fingers example - their perception can learn to differentiate everything, but the new look they bring to reality is just profound. It basically means they will be able to *learn* anything. Just give it time..
On being divided:
We might want to take a look at
Mitchell Silver's new philosophy.
"Rationalist Pragmatism: A Framework on Moral Objectivism"
His book was published just last July 2020.
Silver's practical applications was on Urbanism.
But we might want to take a look at its possible implications on EDUCATION, psychology (personality psychology, cognitive psychology to A.I., and existential psychotherapy.
A specific, new philosophy for A.I. may arise here), sociology, economics, politics, and across all other fields.
Especially for Filipinos.
Only new thing I learned from this is that AI Engineers are the limiting factor.
yeah, it seemed more like subpar stand-up comedy with some basic AI examples.
And I think a worm's brain is vastly more advanced than any single existing AI system today, unless maybe when we are talking about modeling one specific behavior of the earthworm.
@@frydac
any organic brain is more advanced than artificial intelligence today.
only a fool believes otherwise.
the organic brain has many different parts to it, compared to modern computer.
It's a nascent field. What do you expect?
We won't have very interesting AI until a programmer invents self-replicating AI that evolves based on environment.
Except that AI is already much more advanced than this ladies kindergarten lecture. It's already been proven AI can design, engineer, invent new languages, ect
@@redrustyhill2 1. It's a TED Talk (meant for general audiences), so your condescension about how it's a "kindergarten lecture" makes little sense. 2. Those are different applications of AI. Research is being done in many different directions.
I just feel like this woman is the AI, gradually learning to define things more accurately.
Isn’t AI just a weird reflection of ourselves anyway?
@@timcoombes5646 deep
Another Tedx classic. Much thanks 🙏
David: Just make normal legs!
A.I: Im afraid i cant do that, David