Is there something wrong here?🧐 Japan v Poland VNL2024
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 окт 2024
- japan volleyball
yuji nishida
yuki ishikawa
ran takahashi
ran volleyball
ishikawa highlight
nishida highlight
vnl 2024
vnl 2024 japan highlight
france vs japan
バレーボール
волейбол
pallavolo
والیبال
वालीबाल
배구
排球
volleyball spike block ace
double touch, but it doesn't count cus first is a block
enrealidad es solo bloqueo
You have reason
But that follow up isn’t his hand on the other side of the net?? Which is not legal?
Yeah, blocks don't count as touches in general. It can hit your hand twice or both hands one after the other and it won't be a double.
then it be an over the net foul
Double touch but legal
Speak if you're gay
@@TheRamenGuys3 that’s why he said legal?
@@TheRamenGuys3Bro what are u yapping about he said legal cant you read
Nyaho poli teu maneh teh. Puguh eta ngeblok kena nyolek. Tong ngomen mnh teu nyaho poli mah. Mending cicing
1st touch is a block. Followed with spike
I saw double touch but now that you say this, you're right
that would mean he reached over tho if it was followed by the spike. its just considered as block in one motion
It's still considered as a block
@@AD.liEn_250The ball can touch the block multiple times. Doubles don't apply to blocking.
@@matthewtolentino5141 yes but i didnt realize that It was a block
Many people have misunderstanding what a block is.
As long as it is allowed in Physics, you can touch the ball as many times in a block (single action), that means you can touch 10000times the ball if it is a block in single action
finally someone who understands lmao
What if my crush blocks me on Facebook while I touch her twice? Is it legal?
@@luismora9121definitely legal, she’s just overreacting
@@luismora9121 it depends on how you look
Thank you!
While blocking holding on to the ball for a bit and multiple touches are allowed. This is just one valid block. Right call of the ref. The challenge is also for net touch
ブロック中のダブルタッチが認められるのは、ファーストタッチ後ボールが自陣にある場合のみです。
この場合ボールは相手陣内にある為ダブルタッチは認められませんし、相手陣内にあるボールにタッチが認められるのはブロック中のファーストタッチのみであることから相手陣内のボールにタッチしている時点でオーバーネットの反則となります。
例外がありますが、ブロック中に相手陣内でのダブルタッチが認められるのは、意図的でないものに限ります。
First one in this comment section who knows what he is saying
ホールディングじゃなければ、オーバーネットをとるべき。最近、ルールが緩すぎる。
共感でしかない
完璧オーバーネット。
The first touch is a block. The second is an attack over net. It should be a fault.
Why would that be a fault, you just explained why it isnt
n't
@@yesyesyesyesyesyes2021 The second touch is an attack over net!
@tangtang6898 that's not allowed? If he were to block it then come down and bump it over the net that would be a fault?
@@knxdesu no the block doesn't count as a touch so it's not a double touch
Its not because he touch it twice it because he reach over the net and hit it downward, its still consider as the red teams ball
tell me you don't play volleyball without telling me you don't play volleyball LOL
yeah, so before a bunch of idiots join your cause, here are the official FIVB rules:
"11.1.1 In blocking, a player may touch the ball beyond the net, provided that
he/she does not interfere with the opponent’s play before the latter’s attack hit."
After the opposite team made its third hit, you are allowed to block it, whatever the position of the ball is, i.e. you may reach over and block it at their base line if the ball was going backwards, if you can, like superman.
If the opposite team plays the ball near the net, but still on their side, and this was not their third hit, you may still be allowed to block this by reaching beyond the net, if:
1. The ball is moving in the direction of your court.
2. And no player of the opponent could possibly (per the referee’s opinion) reach the ball. You are not allowed to touch the ball beyond the net if it would interfere with the opponent’s play before or during their attack hit.
@@itoobiasedwhy are you insulting right away? I think what he is saying is that because the ball is still in the opponents area after block(1st touch) it is an illegal hit in the opponents space(2nd touch). (Second touch is not a block and he therefore can not reach over net)
No
As far as I remember from when I used to play volleyball it would only be considered a foul if you were interfering with the setter, but in this instance at least it doesn't seem to be the case but I'm not 100% certain on this. And to be fair from this perspective it would even seem that the entire action would be considered a block anyway not 2 touches even if it would look like it in slow motion.
1回目ブロックなら２回目はオーバーでは
だよね。私もそう思った。
そうだとおもう
それ以前にホールディングもしくはオーバーネットとるべきやと思うけどな
@@純愛撲滅委員会会長ホールディングではないかと
オーバーネットにはならないのか
Yall didnt understand its not because of a 2 touches block its because he touches the ball before its in their side and that is not legal
So most pro vball blockers are illegal ? Because they usually block with their hands pushing to the other side.
The big risk for that block would be net touches
@Blitzkit blocking while the ball is on the other side is obviously legal, but he had already touched it one time which counted as a block, the second touch when he pushed it down was an overreach, which is not legal unless its a block
@@aikopppbut since you can touch the ball as many times in a block shouldn’t both touches count as a block?
I think it would only be an overreach if he blocked it on the first landed and then jumped to spike it down, that would be overreach
Completely speculation though would love to see what you think about this.
@_ELzY_ no I think the second touch would already count as a pass, thus overreach, because with the first touch he was able to stop the momentum of the ball to be able to control it and push it down. Even if you're in the air you can still do this kind of stuff, especially passes like these that include overreach because you have to jump over the net and push it down.
This is only my opinion tho, I'm no refree and in the end it's the refree's choice who to give the point to
Ball was still technically on the attacking side when the block occurred, so it should have been considered a reach over foul.
You can reach over as far as you want as long as the opposite team has already made 3rd contact so this is perfectly legal.
@@lifewithminahkwonyes but the block reset their amount of contacts no?
２回触ってる。
ブロックは１打目には数えないのでダブルコンタクトではない。
ブロックにはオーバーネットは適用されないけど、２回目のタッチはオーバーネット。
オーバーネットやキャッチボール（ホールディング）はチャレンジできないからネットタッチでチャレンジしてるのか。
For me looks like illegal, sinse you are allowed to block on opponent's side. But you are not allowed to spike on their side
2 touches
That wasn’t a spike though. Look at it in slow mo again
@@socialjustice95 if it's not a spike, but it's an attack hit.
Yup. I cant see how this one be legal. The second movement was completely on the other side of the net. It would be legal if it’s just a block and no other movement.
@@nino88881it still counts as a block
Same move ishikawa did on the last point vs germany
I watched the live and replay but i did not see anything like this
This is hands down the best thing I've seen today.
ブロックからのスパイクだからドリブルはないけど、だとするとオーバーネットな気がする
ルールブック読みなおせ
@@user-nb6dx1hr6c ルールブック読みなおせ
But the other side wasn’t blocking at the same time, so in fact, he could do that? 🤓
オーバーネットではないな
@@kirakira840オーバーネットになりそうやけどならんのかな？審判によりそうなレベルやけども
You get 2 touches on a block. Clean
It was an over reach 😬
"Consecutive (quick and continuous) contacts with the ball may occur by one or more blockers, provided that the contacts are made during one action."
Whether this is a legit play or not depends on whether you think this is one action or not.
No people ain't arguing about that they rather say it's overnet hence not allowed
Its valid👍 no way a double touch and holding violation as the tip of fingers was used to push the ball down and not the palmas his hands was over the ball
It was an over reach
I think wrong call because the block is legal, also it's not double but the tip is over reaching because still it's Japans ball after the block
Great blocker directing where to drop the ball. 1st time seeing that👋👋
Reaching? the ball hasn't crossed the ball on the other side but it was already pushed downward
Im gonna agree with the people saying its an over the net hit.
Clearly a finger catch followed by a throw down, not a spike. A spike is a hit. This was a catch and slam
Double touch, referee has miss call 🤦♂️
Read the rules, genius, before you lecture others about missing the call.
皆 控え選手だったような…でも、負けても二桁得点 良くガンバった❗👏全日本の将来が楽しみ 頑張れ日本😁😁😁🎊🎊🎊👍👍👍💪💪💪
Нишида не ожидал такого
ธีมเสื้อสีแดงจะเล่นลูกเบาแล้วสวนกลับ
ธีมเสื้อสีขาวคิดเร็ว🎉
Initiatives so sacred😅😅
3 касание японий произошло играть можно на стороне японий все по правилам
a block followed by a spike is volleyball comedy
A basketball professional practicing volleyball 😂
The only thing wrong is that they thought they can win with Poland
The foul is not double touch, he has right to block that didn't count same as touch, but he didn't hit the Ball, he just caught her in one hand and push the ball on the floor, is illegal, and didn't count same a block...
You can catch her with one or two hands, but is not allowed to close down the ball to other side...
I need to hear from a ref
ポーランド強かった😅
強いっすぎそうとうな技術必要そう
Ediots who are commenting double touch , should know that there is no double touch above the net you can basically hold the ball
wrong. show me one time youre allowed to basically hold the ball other than serving.
@@kushdog8when both blockers push the ball it's not just touching
It’s a hold, the ball spins in his hand and he changes the direction of the ball while maintaining contact. You can tip or hit the ball but not change its direction while holding the ball.
블로킹은 터치 1를 안치기때문에 2터치 가능함
The second touch is not a block. It is a overnet hit downwards.
It looks totally legal to me. The only thing the block cannot do is touch the ball before it breaks the plane of the net
When you go up in a block motion you can touch the ball as many times as you want so long as it’s one motion and the hand remains above the net. So long as this is deemed one motion it’s fine I’d say it’s fine.
They stepped across the line that's align together with the net ... isn't that a overside or a reach over foul🤔🤔🤨
I thought its illegal to push the ball while blocking.. cuz whenever i block and there is a chance to push the ball to the other side. I always fake pushin onfront but to the sides
Clean
Not clean
@@bedirhanungur1765 super clean
@@bedirhanungur1765🤦♂️
FOUL.... UNFAIR JUDGING. even amateurs can tell in one look.
Honestly people, don't talk if you don't play the game. Only thing wrong is that it was a push not a spike and on the other side of net. Two illegal moves. No point.
it's legal because it came from the block
3 step> 네트를 잡고 매달렸으면 덩크 완성인데..아쉽다..
In India they say...Ye Carry tha bhai...😅
Could be a call for reaching over the net but not necessarily
First one is a block but the second one is a overnet hit
I would say it is valid if it wasn’t on Japans side when he hit it
double touch but net touch from other team after
Double touch at the diffencer hand
O Vôlei de agora tá muito ruim p permitir essas ações, e o cara passou a mão p outro lado da rede 🙄, umas jogadas que tá sendo permitido pelos juízes é uma vergonha p quem tá lutando por uma medalha, os juízes estão cd vez mais permissivos de deixar umas coisas dessa passar 🤮
Ok call me crazy but isn't making contact across the net illegal if not giving the opponents to make contact first. I guess they did with the spike but idk
Looks legal bc Nishida touched it. Mayyybe a catchball. But that’s up to the ref so if he didn’t call it it’s legal.
Block doesn’t count as one of the 3 touches right?
Im confused?
Would this be considered a legal double touch?
Its not a carry because it bounced off of his hand, and 1st touch on blocks dont count
Block good
The second one is absolutely not a spike
Double contact (touch)
Attack over net
ブロックだからオーバネットにはならないし、連続して２回当たってもワンタッチとみなします。
ブロックの時点ではオーバーネットにはならないが、一旦手から離れて相手コート側で片手で押し込んでいるからオーバーネットになる。
Wouldn’t the second touch be a reach violation?
これありなら体育祭で無双できそう
Not legal bro
FOA its not a spike so its not block touch it is first touch
これは2回タッチにはならないの？
If it was done by Japanese, everyone will say this is good. But it was not done by Japanese so everyone will say this is Poland's fault.😂
It's just your perceptions dude.
Is it legal? Cause yeah block touch isnt considered a touch, but when he attack, isnt the ball at the japan's side?
Overlapping, its illegal
Very fine
オーバーネットやばこの誤審はえぐいだろ
Is it kurek’s shirt?
Si
Yes
Its a block spike🎉😂😂
They scored over the opponents net?
Didn’t he reach its on the other teams side when he did it ????
That's how you block.
why is nishida playing left side hitter?
海外の人なんでダブルコンタクトにしか言及してないの？そもそも問題はダブルコンタクトじゃなくてオーバーネットだし
Jakub Kochanowski the goaaaaaat
DOUBLE TOUCH!!!!
Это вообще было похоже на бросок, еще и на чужой строне
これはブロックでは無いオーバーネット
2 touch, referee need training for sense
His hand is in minus point
There’s nothing wrong here all he did was tip the ball or swipe it to an open spot.
It's legal under the "new" rules. I think the rule is that you are allowed to attack any ball on the other side of the net, no matter if it's the first, second or third touch, if the ball is clearly going to come over and no player is near the ball attempting to play it.
Since the ball was going to come over and nobody was attempting to play it, the overreach is legal.
It's O.k. no fault
Вот это блок я понимаю.
Quá tuyệt vời 🎉
Polska ❤🎉
Post ishikawa as a libero.
Japan not covering
Đúng luật rồi
double touch?
Block isn't count as 1st touch.
@@dauddarmawan2397the second touch is an over reach then🤔
@@Ry3333_i would think so.
No problem
Already hold the ball
After the block, the player took someone else's ball, the ball was not on his side, which means he could not touch it.
This is a throw if anytjing