You stopped him from the most important answer. How do you get someone from 1.5 to 2.5 w/kg. He was about to tell you the answer snd you stopped him and never got back to how to train to get there. So how do I get there? What’s the training regimen?
lose weight to begin with, do zone 2 twice a week for about 1.5 hours, then do session of tempo, SS, threshold and vo2max, each 4 weeks progressive load increase and 1 week break with mostly z2 in between. it's not only about w/kg in a ramp test if you can't recover after a harder effort to ride for 3-4 hours. If you only want to get your FTP higher, go and search on training peaks some ftp increase sessions that you can do indoor. simply put if you want more ftp you need to train that adaptation, but make sure you do those Z2 sessions. Even Inigo tells in some other discussions he is doing 1h of Z2 then do some harder intervals and then go and finish it with some Z2 to clear the lactate (the last z2 will be at lower power than the first to help clear all the lactate) and the easy way to do this, hire a coach as that will give you the best possible outcome for you since it will be personalized for your time and current fitness and so on
It's easy....first you....ah just a sec phone call....ok, as I was saying you want to do some zone 2 training, maybe 3, 4 times a week, ideally 5 or 6, for 60-90 minutes then....oh sorry someone at the door, I'll edit post later and fill in the rest.
Peter Attia has high profile guests on his show to say "yes Peter I agree with you" so he can go back to his clients / customers and overcharge them for his bullsh1t therapies. The whole podcast is a front to pump his business.
Peter Attia has high profile guests on his show to say "yes Peter I agree with you" so he can go back to his clients / customers and overcharge them for his bullsh1t therapies. The whole podcast is a front to pump his business.
Peter's talk about medication @ 11:00 brings up an important topic for millions of people: What if you're taking stimulant medication for ADHD which increases heart rate? Does this mean you actually have to work at a higher heart rate to achieve Zone 2 than without? I notice Z2 days with adderall or vyvance def feel like "less work" (almost effortless) vs days without. I've never heard anyone talk about this. If someone on Dr. Attia's team reads this - please add this question to be addressed!
Attia, in his book and all his videos/pods, notes that rate of perceived exertion is a better gauge of Z2 than HR. So, if you can talk for a bit in full sentences but it’s uncomfortable, and (if on the phone) the other person can definitely tell you’re doing cardio, you’re likely in Z2 regardless of HR (Z2 won’t always correlate with HR based on other factors as well, e.g. lack of sleep, stress, etc)
Your breathing rate is probably going up while the medication is active. Try measuring while doing a certain breath tempo with and without the meds to compare. Nose breathing helps lower heart rate and breath volume
Peter Attia lives interviewing himself. My God he's terrible at allowing anyone who knows more than he does to speak so I can learn it from a better source. 💯
I love the good and scientific explanations from Inigo San Millan and Peter Attia, and i think they are correct with rpe and talk test. But the MAF calculation although simple will get you in zone 2 as well. It will require a hrt monitor, but the cost of these are quite low nowadays.
An absolutely brilliant and most salient discussion. Thank you both. Having retired soon after my 60th birthday, I have at least gotten *one* thing right in my life. 😄
As a very glycolytic athlete, if you had asked me to find my zone 2 by relative perceived effort, i would have been way off. It wasn't until I did lactate testing that I found the right level. Now, after testing lactate, I can go on RPE but not initially.
This is an important point. There's a whole bunch of people who have been training very differently for many years, and may have aerobic deficiency syndrome. For them a lactate test, or if you don't have access to a lactate meter then other option would be to do a drift test and figure out what your zone 2 (or aerobic threshold is) and then you can start training to improve that.
I did train by feel for years, startet doing the drift test this year. Found out I was actually to slow a lot of the time. Retestet myself just a week ago, and my Zone 2 moved up like 10 beats. @@KuntalJoisher
I will be 70 y.o. in April. I can carry on a conversation with HR at 160. I sometimes hit 180 HR out on the bike. I guestimate my maximum HR is around 190 but never go there. If riding with a top amateur in my town...say in a paceline at 27-28mph in a paceline, I start to go anaerobic with HR. at 185 or so and can't sustain it. My maximum sprint in my own air is about 30mph....a bit higher with lead out. I swim and bike almost every day. My resting heart rate is about 52 bpm when waking up in the morning coming of out sleep. I am probably top 5-10% for my age for speed within the 'average biking community'. There are certainly faster elite cyclists with higher VO2 around my age, but not a lot in my town.
@@SonnyDarvish Thanks for your reply. I am not a small rider. I am 6'1" and 185 lbs with long legs and arms. I have a youthful looking body, largely due to all the swimming I do, i.e. upper body development and light weight lifting. I grew up a competitive swimmer. I will say, I know two 'elite' riders around my age with much lower HR however with more endurance on the bike. One is 74 years old. He can ride 22mph in his own air mile after mile with me in his draft. I have more top end power than he does in a sprint but he has better endurance. We have ridden together in fast group rides for many years and he speculates he has outlier genetics which I believe to be the case. His father lived to be 106. He has a freakish heart and/or lungs and V02 max. He does train harder than me and rides more miles. Another is 65 years old and a very small man as you mentioned that is freakishly fast on the bike. To give you an idea, I also own a high power electric roadbike I built and use for zone 2 recovery riding that I sometimes ride with elite younger riders because they are my friends and I enjoy speed. This 65 year old racer can hold my wheel at 30 mph in my draft for as long as I care to go with motor assist. He is the fastest 65 y.o. in my town and there are a handful that were competitive racers and still very fast. Honestly, I am astounded by his speed on the bike. Small, aero, no fat, great muscle tone. The body of a 30 y.o. He rides constantly at 25 mph in his own air. I can't hold his wheel at full gas.
At the beginning of the talk you mentioned putting aside people on high fat low carb diets, can you briefly explain what this diet changes in relation to Zone 2 training. I'm coming up on 4 years on a high fat low carb diet.
I have tried to get a god z2 training session cycling in the suburbs but because of the hilly nature of the area I really find it challenging to not hit a higher zone at times. I’m above average fitness level.
Peter/ Inigo: i gradually titrate the incline on treadmill to find my zone 2. there is a point where my heart rate doesn't go up proportionally to the incline increase. this brief plateau is the top of my zone 2. If i push through a bit more, I'll suddenly come into a new pocket of energy, this is when my body has switched from fat oxidation to glycolytic energy. These thresholds are not at the same heart rate each day, depends on my recovery state, multifactorial. hence training by defined heart rate zones should just serve as a guide.
At the 10:50 point (beta blocker Propranolol), to get more power per heartbeat, which is what he is saying, your heart has to pump more blood per heartbeat, which also increases the forces inside your heart. His analogy was like when you are "lugging" a car engine at a low RPM but high load, which is a good analogy, as your car is doing more work per revolution, increasing forces on your pistons. The uncomfortable feeling is from the high forces in your heart. Sounds a little damaging, dangerous even, to increase those forces during high intensity exercise with a drug. He shouldn't do that for longevity.
I'm 68, 225 lb retired Physical Therapist assistant. Thank you Dr Peter. I'm a cyclist who has become convinced of Zone 2 to improve my cycling fitness. Probably my FTP is my zone 2. I have come to know my Z2, and can only hold it max 1 hour. I ride 50 miles, 3,000 elevation gain @ about 12 mph. I try to maintain my Z2 for about 30 minutes at a time. I feel my cardio gets stressed even in zone 1, if I go long, like over 5 hours. Is is benefitting me when going long in zone 1?
A question I find myself asking often when talking about zone 2 training is how that fits in with weight lifting. I know zone 2 training is optimal for building up base level endurance (such as running distance) and training hard often increases stress. How does this fit in with someone who is training a mix of weights and running. Often times lifting coaches talk about training to near failure (high RPE). Should some of the lifting be done at lower intensities? Does the high intensity lifting require more lower intensity running to stay balanced?
I find a good mix of lifting heavy for majority of my workouts (rep ranges of 3-5 reps at RPE 8) for compound movements followed by majority of my riding at Z2 is the sweet spot. I don’t really get sore lifting at that level to the point of not being able to spend time at Z2 efforts. I’ll also have a group ride or harder trainer ride during the week that puts me at a decent amount of time near or above threshold.
Very interesting, thanks a lot!! However, interested to know how you can determine zone 2 when you do not know your realised max heart rate? Is garmin indication accurate? Would really appreciate if you could please clarify. Thanks
Could wrist computers for training show zones with a digit, like Z3.1 or Z2.7 so that based on user metrics the location within the zone would be visible, so you could seek to be at almost the next zone but not yet, or in the middle of the zone the whole workout.
Very interesting discussion around the end in terms of life/work loading on top of exercise load. Have definitely felt that. Would love to know more (for men and women, to the extent the science is different!).
Interesting points on hr rise factor. On my weight training sessions I sometimes can't get past 140 bpm, while the norm is 155-165 or so. And on these days I always feel lethargic. While running I can talk complete short sentences to about the threshold of 80..83 % max HR in sustained effort (20 min+) when my level is good. Also noted that this threshold appears to track with fitness level. Winter times I don't run much and the ZONE2 fitness suffers. I pick it up each spring and see the HR level go up where I am able to hold conversation.
I’m interested in seeing how people are keeping up this training in their late 60’s into their 70’s. I’m sure there are some that can but I’m sure their are many that will have a difficult time
My zone 2 was measured to be from 70 to 81% of max heartrate, but highest zone 2 (146 bpm) sometimes is easybreathing like speakable, and sometimes heavybreathing like speaking is problematic. I guess 146 rise up to zone 3 when going hard early, its like the heart hasnt accelerated up to full action yet, and maybe that early 146 gives a lot more watts than late 146. Any thoughts about this?
My heart rate only reaches 60% even with maximum effort in cold weathers. On the other hand, in hot and dry weather, zone 2 effort raises my heart rate to 90% sometimes. So it seems like for me, heart rate is more dependent on temperature than effort. So I just pay attention to RPE only these days.
Definitely. I live in a hot humid climate, but when I exercise in cooler weather, a similar RPE will frequently result in an average heart rate 20 to 30 points lower than what I generally experience in 90°F humid weather. Such a drastic difference.
This was instructive and helpful. From watching one of Dr. Attia's videos the other day I realized my Zone 2 was not vigorous enough. Can you do one on Zone 5? Thanks.
What makes Peter worth listening to is when he's working through something hard like lipidology. The problem that Peter has is that he comes from a surgical perspective, in which there's a right way to perform a surgery, and a wrong way that will get you sued. He may never understand that there is no "right way" to exercise. There are simply several themes that you work within. The more that he tries to achieve the "correct" protocol, the more he tends to miss the mark, I think. (Writing as a physiotherapist with 32 years in practice.)
It seems like everybody has a different heart rate percentage, the fact that you have a conversation with a little bit of effort is an individual task to find the real number to work in your zone 2, still not a clear percentage from heart rate percentage, 80% seems to be too high.
How long should one be able to sustain zone 2 training, as it is called steady state? Morpheus app is also spitting out something around 75% of my max heart rate, but I don't feel I can sustain that for hours. I actually have to fight to keep the heart rate that high. I even struggle getting it that high on a bike, if there is no hill to climb.
After around 2 years of a lot (around 10 hours per week) of aerobic training I think my top Z2 is just under 75% Max HR (which is something I’ve observed once in training and once in a race). I can maintain that for around 3 hours on a bike (indoor turbo) before muscle fatigue becomes noticeable and I start getting heart rate drift upwards. That is at 3.6w/kg. When I started I couldn’t go so long at that power without getting cumulative fatigue. I worked instead at 65-70% Max HR and gradually built volume on the bike to 2 hour sessions. Then I started increasing my power to ride at higher % Max HR and have got to 74% Max HR at 2-2.5 hours usually and feeling I can do the talk test plus repeat a number of days. My guess is that you are developing both localised fatigue resistance (legs) and aerobic pathways (including heart size/strength) and there may be a limiter in one of those areas. Gradually building volume I think may gradually eliminate your limiter (which could be local muscle fatigue resistance or heart or something else). I always fuel well when doing top Z2 - I’m burning a lot of energy doing 280W for 2 hours. That also helps faster recovery so you can repeat the next day and so on.
@@jeremyleake6868 thank's for the insides, very informative. Actually I never did cardio training just for that purpose, nor ever owned a road bike. I just do a lot of transport on bike and in addition did a lot of mountaineering with high cardio profile. Years ago I also travelled long distances by touring bike, with tons of baggage, visiting relatives all over the nation. Sometimes up to 200kms per day, with 30+ kg of stuff several days back to back. Currently just doing transport by bike and try to stay at upper z2 most of the time. Just for the reported health benefits and trying to optimize time utilization.
@@mangiari The only extra thing I’d add is that in my experience Inigo’s prescription for intensity (towards top Z2), length (ideally 1.5 hours or more) and frequency (ideally 4 times a week) of Z2 really works for improving the LT1 threshold. 1 hour per session is good, but 1.5 hours really improves it. I include in that the warm up (I ramp for 15 mins from very low power, my legs need that to ‘acclimatise’ and it feels so much better and so more motivating) and cool down (5-10 mins). Some of the ramp up will be Z2 if your steady state part is top Z2. I found it effective not to try and cheat and increase power too quickly as my LT1 increased. Ie don’t be tempted to ride at a power that makes your HR go up if you think you can take it, because it will either adversely affect your third or fourth session that week or you will get too much cumulative fatigue the following week (especially if you’ve done one or two high intensity workouts plus resistance training). The trick is to hold back the ego and desire to improve too fast, especially for highly motivated athletes.
@@cordeiropedro that does not make any sense to me. Elite athlets still do a lot of zone2 training and I doubt that they would have any adaptions, if they could maintain it for half a day. My understanding is that 140bpm is equal demanding for elite and intermediate, just the wattage/speed is way lower in the latter.
*Takes three minutes to ask a question* *Immediately interrupts guest when he starts to answer the question and explains how much he knows..* Anyone know if he let Inigo answer that questions elsewhere in the interview not in this clip?
couldnt agree more. Peter has guests so he can speak about how awesome his understanding is, even though his guest are several levels above him and yet he is the one that needs to do the explaining. Just a typical narcissist.
So Peter said zone 2 is probably between 70 -80% of max heart rate. For me, as a 43 yr old male that is between 130 - 150. Does that sound about right?
@@mfiocca hey thanks. So i think im gonna get a heart rate monitor and just do my cardio sessions within 130-150, but ill probably aim to keep within 135-145. Can anyone suggest a good wearable hr monitor? Ive heard a Whoop is good?
@@what-gq9qu i'm not fully knowledgable on a lot of monitors, but i have the sensor bundle that came with my Garmin Edge 530... works well. I just started getting into low-intensity high volume training this year, with 1 or 2 intense workouts per week. I don't strictly go by heart rate, i mostly try for perceived exertion across the durations that I ride. So most days my target is to ride for 1 hour, and then I just ride where it "feels" like zone 2.. when looking at my heart monitor it just happens to fall in the 135 zone and climbs up to around 150/160 by the end of my workouts.
Sometimes I'm on my exercise bike and I accidentally dip into Zone 3 and I lose all the cardiovascular benefits of the session and un-burn all the calories I had burned previously. Who cares about being exact about this?
The guy spends an enormous amount of time asking a question that is not really a question but a bunch of his own opinions and when the expert starts to answer he interrupts him. That's the worst interview I've ever seen. Why not just make a RUclips video of him alone if he is so full of himself?
Please stop calling zone 2 metabolic energy stage as zone 2. Experts that use the zone 2 reference confuse it with heart rate zone which is not the same thing. Use the phrase Stage 2 because in affect that is more accurate. Just saying zone without qualifying your reference confuses people that hear zone 2. When talking about power zone 2 it is understood. So let's start using "Stages" for referencing energy system training since there is only 3. Stage 1 is mainly fat burning, stage 2 is fat/carb transitional mix, and stage 3 is mainly carbs. Now we are all using the same nomenclature and have a common understanding. Yay!
You've talked about it ad nauseum, and it's just not that important. Zone 2 is where unfit people to start, and fit people recover. That's it. The goal should be to be in zone 2 as little as is necessary.
Dr, Atia is very smart and knowledgeable. However, I agree with all the comments below. I am sorry to see him feel uncomfortable if he is not the authority . He asks for an opinion, but feels the need to interject his views. Really too bad.
We agree that he is bragging, right? Drops numbers. Something like 2h 5 days a week is low, compared to his heyday of course. Numbers are still true I think, dude is a real workhorse I’d guess. But he’s bragging.
Peter is definitely not out of touch with people. Everything he teaches he also teaches how to scale it down. I’ve watched probably 50 to 100 of his videos and think that they have been absolutely fantastic. I wouldn’t be so quick to criticize.
Peters Attia’s zone 2 is on the envelope of 3 watts/kg?!?!? Sweet fancy Moses! My FTP is 3 watts/kg, and I’m at lactate of 8 mmole. Dr Attia is in amazing shape or I’m in terrible shape. #KickAss100YrOld.
Peter Attia has high profile guests on his show to say "yes Peter I agree with you" so he can go back to his clients / customers and overcharge them for his bullsh1t therapies. The whole podcast is a front to pump his business.
Gostaria de ouvir o convidado (entrevistado) e não o entrevistador, isso para mim foi um monólogo, chato e cansativo e com interrupções horríveis. Assunto interessante mas o entrevistador quer aparecer mais que o convidado. HORRÍVEL!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Do everyone a favor and have Stanford's, Professor Christopher Gardner on your podcast to talk about daily protein requirements. Enough with "eat a cow and call me in the morning", Don Layman.
Christopher Gardner's goals (and his followers' goals) are not solid athletism at 70, running after grandkids at age 80, hiking at age 90, etc. This channel is for people who are interested in those kind of things. So this channel is not the right place for Christopher Gardner. In fact, he mentions in one of his lectures that he knows a football player that eats obscene amounts of per day but that's not his topic to cover.
then why dont u call him to your podcast? o wait, u don't have one even if u started one, who the fuk's gonna watch🥴 so let the professionals do their thing
Chill man. Gardners requirements don’t fit my personal goals, however I think it would be interesting to see someone that is on the higher end of protein intake and advice discuss protein requirement for people with different goals as I do think there is a bit of confusion with the idea of muscle mass, strength, and aging. Having strong, lean muscle mass vs bulking hypertrophy mass are two different things for aging. Building muscle vs building strength and how those relate to eachother in aging are also nuances that should be further discussed. If your muscle mass stays the same, but you double your strength, that’s probably better than building a lot of muscle with not as much strength, etc.
Finish your drink every time Peter interrupts his guest trying to answer the question Peter asked
You stopped him from the most important answer. How do you get someone from 1.5 to 2.5 w/kg. He was about to tell you the answer snd you stopped him and never got back to how to train to get there. So how do I get there? What’s the training regimen?
lose weight to begin with, do zone 2 twice a week for about 1.5 hours, then do session of tempo, SS, threshold and vo2max, each 4 weeks progressive load increase and 1 week break with mostly z2 in between. it's not only about w/kg in a ramp test if you can't recover after a harder effort to ride for 3-4 hours. If you only want to get your FTP higher, go and search on training peaks some ftp increase sessions that you can do indoor. simply put if you want more ftp you need to train that adaptation, but make sure you do those Z2 sessions. Even Inigo tells in some other discussions he is doing 1h of Z2 then do some harder intervals and then go and finish it with some Z2 to clear the lactate (the last z2 will be at lower power than the first to help clear all the lactate)
and the easy way to do this, hire a coach as that will give you the best possible outcome for you since it will be personalized for your time and current fitness and so on
Start racing
Yeah, and all that to talk about that propanolol thing which noone relates to
It's easy....first you....ah just a sec phone call....ok, as I was saying you want to do some zone 2 training, maybe 3, 4 times a week, ideally 5 or 6, for 60-90 minutes then....oh sorry someone at the door, I'll edit post later and fill in the rest.
Peter Attia has high profile guests on his show to say "yes Peter I agree with you" so he can go back to his clients / customers and overcharge them for his bullsh1t therapies.
The whole podcast is a front to pump his business.
You have to biggest expert of this field and you don't let him just talk 😵. OMG, he is so good in explaining... Let him talk, it's gold
There 2 kinds of people: Those who enjoy listening and those who enjoy talking
Peter Attia has high profile guests on his show to say "yes Peter I agree with you" so he can go back to his clients / customers and overcharge them for his bullsh1t therapies.
The whole podcast is a front to pump his business.
G k😅😮😅zďďgbfgʻn😂nggfgk😢😂hnðźźzffððddddddzxddjjkgxvl😮😮😮😂gʻjjjliy😢gchxx̌x̌ĉku@@joost3732i😮😮😢i
Kn
We are blessed to have Iñigo in Bilbao. He'll bring our Lions to the highest levels of performance. The sky is the limit!
The interviewer is most interested to show he knows something about the topic and interrupt the guess during important part of the answers. Arrogant
‘It looks like old-school, but it works beautifully’. Exactly! And it’s even more true for non-competitive athletes.
Peter Attia! Stop interrupting your guests! They are experts in their field! They are not jack-of -all-trades! Please, please, it's not about you!
I know. I want to hear them without him influencing their answers.
This x10000. He loves the sound of his own voice
You can provide the feedback (interrupt less) without assailing his character. If you don’t like the guy, don’t watch.
Exactly my thoughts. This isn't about
Agreeeee!!! He was talking more than his invite
Retire at 60 that is my goal and to ride a lot more. Love Z2 ridding Great discussion.
Dr. Attia and Dr. San-Millan you just answered my question, thank you so much.
Peter's talk about medication @ 11:00 brings up an important topic for millions of people: What if you're taking stimulant medication for ADHD which increases heart rate? Does this mean you actually have to work at a higher heart rate to achieve Zone 2 than without? I notice Z2 days with adderall or vyvance def feel like "less work" (almost effortless) vs days without. I've never heard anyone talk about this. If someone on Dr. Attia's team reads this - please add this question to be addressed!
I’m also curious. Straterra raised my heart rate 15-20bpm normally, so zone 2 doesn’t feel like a lot even though I’m certainly out of shape
Attia, in his book and all his videos/pods, notes that rate of perceived exertion is a better gauge of Z2 than HR.
So, if you can talk for a bit in full sentences but it’s uncomfortable, and (if on the phone) the other person can definitely tell you’re doing cardio, you’re likely in Z2 regardless of HR (Z2 won’t always correlate with HR based on other factors as well, e.g. lack of sleep, stress, etc)
Your breathing rate is probably going up while the medication is active. Try measuring while doing a certain breath tempo with and without the meds to compare. Nose breathing helps lower heart rate and breath volume
Peter Attia lives interviewing himself. My God he's terrible at allowing anyone who knows more than he does to speak so I can learn it from a better source. 💯
I love the good and scientific explanations from Inigo San Millan and Peter Attia, and i think they are correct with rpe and talk test. But the MAF calculation although simple will get you in zone 2 as well. It will require a hrt monitor, but the cost of these are quite low nowadays.
An absolutely brilliant and most salient discussion. Thank you both. Having retired soon after my 60th birthday, I have at least gotten *one* thing right in my life. 😄
As a very glycolytic athlete, if you had asked me to find my zone 2 by relative perceived effort, i would have been way off. It wasn't until I did lactate testing that I found the right level. Now, after testing lactate, I can go on RPE but not initially.
At what point do you do the lactate meter? During the exercise? Or at the end/
This is an important point. There's a whole bunch of people who have been training very differently for many years, and may have aerobic deficiency syndrome. For them a lactate test, or if you don't have access to a lactate meter then other option would be to do a drift test and figure out what your zone 2 (or aerobic threshold is) and then you can start training to improve that.
I did train by feel for years, startet doing the drift test this year. Found out I was actually to slow a lot of the time. Retestet myself just a week ago, and my Zone 2 moved up like 10 beats. @@KuntalJoisher
I will be 70 y.o. in April. I can carry on a conversation with HR at 160. I sometimes hit 180 HR out on the bike. I guestimate my maximum HR is around 190 but never go there. If riding with a top amateur in my town...say in a paceline at 27-28mph in a paceline, I start to go anaerobic with HR. at 185 or so and can't sustain it. My maximum sprint in my own air is about 30mph....a bit higher with lead out. I swim and bike almost every day. My resting heart rate is about 52 bpm when waking up in the morning coming of out sleep.
I am probably top 5-10% for my age for speed within the 'average biking community'. There are certainly faster elite cyclists with higher VO2 around my age, but not a lot in my town.
Impressive numbers! I've been observing cyclists and generally find smaller, shorter, slimmer riders have higher HRMax
@@SonnyDarvish
Thanks for your reply. I am not a small rider. I am 6'1" and 185 lbs with long legs and arms. I have a youthful looking body, largely due to all the swimming I do, i.e. upper body development and light weight lifting. I grew up a competitive swimmer. I will say, I know two 'elite' riders around my age with much lower HR however with more endurance on the bike. One is 74 years old. He can ride 22mph in his own air mile after mile with me in his draft. I have more top end power than he does in a sprint but he has better endurance. We have ridden together in fast group rides for many years and he speculates he has outlier genetics which I believe to be the case. His father lived to be 106. He has a freakish heart and/or lungs and V02 max. He does train harder than me and rides more miles. Another is 65 years old and a very small man as you mentioned that is freakishly fast on the bike. To give you an idea, I also own a high power electric roadbike I built and use for zone 2 recovery riding that I sometimes ride with elite younger riders because they are my friends and I enjoy speed. This 65 year old racer can hold my wheel at 30 mph in my draft for as long as I care to go with motor assist. He is the fastest 65 y.o. in my town and there are a handful that were competitive racers and still very fast. Honestly, I am astounded by his speed on the bike. Small, aero, no fat, great muscle tone. The body of a 30 y.o. He rides constantly at 25 mph in his own air. I can't hold his wheel at full gas.
I can hold a conversation at 160 hr but im not relaxed when i was doing that - i have to focus on my effort. Thats not zone 2. Its way over zone two
For real. It’s not a contest who can talk at the highest sustained heart rate lmao
Ugh... another geezer bragging about his fitness under the auspices of "heart rate training". Give a rest. No one cares.
Absolutely incredible interview. Fantastic information. Ignore the jealous critics.
At the beginning of the talk you mentioned putting aside people on high fat low carb diets, can you briefly explain what this diet changes in relation to Zone 2 training. I'm coming up on 4 years on a high fat low carb diet.
I have tried to get a god z2 training session cycling in the suburbs but because of the hilly nature of the area I really find it challenging to not hit a higher zone at times. I’m above average fitness level.
Jesus Peter stop interrupting!! I wanted to hear his answer!
Peter/ Inigo: i gradually titrate the incline on treadmill to find my zone 2. there is a point where my heart rate doesn't go up proportionally to the incline increase. this brief plateau is the top of my zone 2. If i push through a bit more, I'll suddenly come into a new pocket of energy, this is when my body has switched from fat oxidation to glycolytic energy. These thresholds are not at the same heart rate each day, depends on my recovery state, multifactorial. hence training by defined heart rate zones should just serve as a guide.
At the 10:50 point (beta blocker Propranolol), to get more power per heartbeat, which is what he is saying, your heart has to pump more blood per heartbeat, which also increases the forces inside your heart. His analogy was like when you are "lugging" a car engine at a low RPM but high load, which is a good analogy, as your car is doing more work per revolution, increasing forces on your pistons. The uncomfortable feeling is from the high forces in your heart. Sounds a little damaging, dangerous even, to increase those forces during high intensity exercise with a drug. He shouldn't do that for longevity.
I'm 68, 225 lb retired Physical Therapist assistant.
Thank you Dr Peter.
I'm a cyclist who has become convinced of Zone 2 to improve my cycling fitness.
Probably my FTP is my zone 2. I have come to know my Z2, and can only hold it max 1 hour.
I ride 50 miles, 3,000 elevation gain @ about 12 mph. I try to maintain my Z2 for about 30 minutes at a time.
I feel my cardio gets stressed even in zone 1, if I go long, like over 5 hours.
Is is benefitting me when going long in zone 1?
A question I find myself asking often when talking about zone 2 training is how that fits in with weight lifting. I know zone 2 training is optimal for building up base level endurance (such as running distance) and training hard often increases stress. How does this fit in with someone who is training a mix of weights and running. Often times lifting coaches talk about training to near failure (high RPE). Should some of the lifting be done at lower intensities? Does the high intensity lifting require more lower intensity running to stay balanced?
I find a good mix of lifting heavy for majority of my workouts (rep ranges of 3-5 reps at RPE 8) for compound movements followed by majority of my riding at Z2 is the sweet spot. I don’t really get sore lifting at that level to the point of not being able to spend time at Z2 efforts. I’ll also have a group ride or harder trainer ride during the week that puts me at a decent amount of time near or above threshold.
@@PlayGamesRideBikescycling is adding generally much less stress compared to running
Thanks for your video.
Very interesting, thanks a lot!! However, interested to know how you can determine zone 2 when you do not know your realised max heart rate? Is garmin indication accurate?
Would really appreciate if you could please clarify.
Thanks
Could wrist computers for training show zones with a digit, like Z3.1 or Z2.7 so that based on user metrics the location within the zone would be visible, so you could seek to be at almost the next zone but not yet, or in the middle of the zone the whole workout.
Very interesting discussion around the end in terms of life/work loading on top of exercise load. Have definitely felt that. Would love to know more (for men and women, to the extent the science is different!).
So what's the simple metric? Barely able to have a conversation?
Interesting points on hr rise factor. On my weight training sessions I sometimes can't get past 140 bpm, while the norm is 155-165 or so. And on these days I always feel lethargic.
While running I can talk complete short sentences to about the threshold of 80..83 % max HR in sustained effort (20 min+) when my level is good.
Also noted that this threshold appears to track with fitness level.
Winter times I don't run much and the ZONE2 fitness suffers. I pick it up each spring and see the HR level go up where I am able to hold conversation.
Thoughts on etCO2 for identifying when you exit zone 2?
I’m interested in seeing how people are keeping up this training in their late 60’s into their 70’s. I’m sure there are some that can but I’m sure their are many that will have a difficult time
My zone 2 was measured to be from 70 to 81% of max heartrate, but highest zone 2 (146 bpm) sometimes is easybreathing like speakable, and sometimes heavybreathing like speaking is problematic. I guess 146 rise up to zone 3 when going hard early, its like the heart hasnt accelerated up to full action yet, and maybe that early 146 gives a lot more watts than late 146. Any thoughts about this?
This is from an old video. Why repost the same info?
For the clicks and algorithm I assume.
Yep this did it for me, i will stop him from talking and let the experts convey info directly
did anyone use the app called Morpheus? Peter mentioned that app in one of his podcasts. Please let me know your view on the app Morpheus.
Sorry, I missed this whole power of watts per kg. Does anyone recall what Peter meant by the differences between his 2 different power out puts?
My heart rate only reaches 60% even with maximum effort in cold weathers. On the other hand, in hot and dry weather, zone 2 effort raises my heart rate to 90% sometimes. So it seems like for me, heart rate is more dependent on temperature than effort. So I just pay attention to RPE only these days.
At 90% of max hr you are not in zone 2. Even if rpe feels fine and the power is what you would be comfortable with in different conditions
Definitely. I live in a hot humid climate, but when I exercise in cooler weather, a similar RPE will frequently result in an average heart rate 20 to 30 points lower than what I generally experience in 90°F humid weather. Such a drastic difference.
i couldnt make it past 3:50… “let me ask you a question in the form of an essay, but before you can answer let me stop you so i can talk more” >_
This was instructive and helpful. From watching one of Dr. Attia's videos the other day I realized my Zone 2 was not vigorous enough. Can you do one on Zone 5? Thanks.
What makes Peter worth listening to is when he's working through something hard like lipidology.
The problem that Peter has is that he comes from a surgical perspective, in which there's a right way to perform a surgery, and a wrong way that will get you sued. He may never understand that there is no "right way" to exercise. There are simply several themes that you work within. The more that he tries to achieve the "correct" protocol, the more he tends to miss the mark, I think. (Writing as a physiotherapist with 32 years in practice.)
It seems like everybody has a different heart rate percentage, the fact that you have a conversation with a little bit of effort is an individual task to find the real number to work in your zone 2, still not a clear percentage from heart rate percentage, 80% seems to be too high.
It is not just that, the heart rate will (up to a point) be moving up with training.
Love your t shirt ❤
How long should one be able to sustain zone 2 training, as it is called steady state? Morpheus app is also spitting out something around 75% of my max heart rate, but I don't feel I can sustain that for hours. I actually have to fight to keep the heart rate that high. I even struggle getting it that high on a bike, if there is no hill to climb.
After around 2 years of a lot (around 10 hours per week) of aerobic training I think my top Z2 is just under 75% Max HR (which is something I’ve observed once in training and once in a race). I can maintain that for around 3 hours on a bike (indoor turbo) before muscle fatigue becomes noticeable and I start getting heart rate drift upwards. That is at 3.6w/kg. When I started I couldn’t go so long at that power without getting cumulative fatigue. I worked instead at 65-70% Max HR and gradually built volume on the bike to 2 hour sessions. Then I started increasing my power to ride at higher % Max HR and have got to 74% Max HR at 2-2.5 hours usually and feeling I can do the talk test plus repeat a number of days. My guess is that you are developing both localised fatigue resistance (legs) and aerobic pathways (including heart size/strength) and there may be a limiter in one of those areas. Gradually building volume I think may gradually eliminate your limiter (which could be local muscle fatigue resistance or heart or something else). I always fuel well when doing top Z2 - I’m burning a lot of energy doing 280W for 2 hours. That also helps faster recovery so you can repeat the next day and so on.
@@jeremyleake6868 thank's for the insides, very informative. Actually I never did cardio training just for that purpose, nor ever owned a road bike. I just do a lot of transport on bike and in addition did a lot of mountaineering with high cardio profile. Years ago I also travelled long distances by touring bike, with tons of baggage, visiting relatives all over the nation. Sometimes up to 200kms per day, with 30+ kg of stuff several days back to back.
Currently just doing transport by bike and try to stay at upper z2 most of the time. Just for the reported health benefits and trying to optimize time utilization.
@@mangiari The only extra thing I’d add is that in my experience Inigo’s prescription for intensity (towards top Z2), length (ideally 1.5 hours or more) and frequency (ideally 4 times a week) of Z2 really works for improving the LT1 threshold. 1 hour per session is good, but 1.5 hours really improves it. I include in that the warm up (I ramp for 15 mins from very low power, my legs need that to ‘acclimatise’ and it feels so much better and so more motivating) and cool down (5-10 mins). Some of the ramp up will be Z2 if your steady state part is top Z2. I found it effective not to try and cheat and increase power too quickly as my LT1 increased. Ie don’t be tempted to ride at a power that makes your HR go up if you think you can take it, because it will either adversely affect your third or fourth session that week or you will get too much cumulative fatigue the following week (especially if you’ve done one or two high intensity workouts plus resistance training). The trick is to hold back the ego and desire to improve too fast, especially for highly motivated athletes.
@@cordeiropedro that does not make any sense to me. Elite athlets still do a lot of zone2 training and I doubt that they would have any adaptions, if they could maintain it for half a day. My understanding is that 140bpm is equal demanding for elite and intermediate, just the wattage/speed is way lower in the latter.
*Takes three minutes to ask a question*
*Immediately interrupts guest when he starts to answer the question and explains how much he knows..*
Anyone know if he let Inigo answer that questions elsewhere in the interview not in this clip?
Why have a guest on the show?
@@kennethrichard5836 because the interview was awesome to say the least!
couldnt agree more. Peter has guests so he can speak about how awesome his understanding is, even though his guest are several levels above him and yet he is the one that needs to do the explaining. Just a typical narcissist.
Is zone 2. 60-70 or 70-80%??? So many different answers
THANKS!
So Peter said zone 2 is probably between 70 -80% of max heart rate. For me, as a 43 yr old male that is between 130 - 150. Does that sound about right?
im 43… my “RPE” for zone 2 is right around 135/140
@@mfiocca hey thanks. So i think im gonna get a heart rate monitor and just do my cardio sessions within 130-150, but ill probably aim to keep within 135-145. Can anyone suggest a good wearable hr monitor? Ive heard a Whoop is good?
@@what-gq9qu i'm not fully knowledgable on a lot of monitors, but i have the sensor bundle that came with my Garmin Edge 530... works well. I just started getting into low-intensity high volume training this year, with 1 or 2 intense workouts per week. I don't strictly go by heart rate, i mostly try for perceived exertion across the durations that I ride. So most days my target is to ride for 1 hour, and then I just ride where it "feels" like zone 2.. when looking at my heart monitor it just happens to fall in the 135 zone and climbs up to around 150/160 by the end of my workouts.
@@mattfiocca2738 thanks. Good luck with the training
yes it does, for me it's hard to maintain while cycling because the muscles around my knee start to fatigue. I need to build them up more
Sometimes I'm on my exercise bike and I accidentally dip into Zone 3 and I lose all the cardiovascular benefits of the session and un-burn all the calories I had burned previously.
Who cares about being exact about this?
? How does that work?
(off-topic, and I apologize, but Doc had you seen Lisa Moscone's new menopause brain book?)
6:55 Zone 2 heart rate approximation
The guy spends an enormous amount of time asking a question that is not really a question but a bunch of his own opinions and when the expert starts to answer he interrupts him. That's the worst interview I've ever seen. Why not just make a RUclips video of him alone if he is so full of himself?
came here for inigo and left because of attia.
Please stop calling zone 2 metabolic energy stage as zone 2. Experts that use the zone 2 reference confuse it with heart rate zone which is not the same thing. Use the phrase Stage 2 because in affect that is more accurate. Just saying zone without qualifying your reference confuses people that hear zone 2. When talking about power zone 2 it is understood. So let's start using "Stages" for referencing energy system training since there is only 3. Stage 1 is mainly fat burning, stage 2 is fat/carb transitional mix, and stage 3 is mainly carbs. Now we are all using the same nomenclature and have a common understanding. Yay!
HCLF is the 🔑 for me…
Peter Attia’s Diets are KETO and IF….Does not work on Endurance Training
Thank you.
inderal has some other interesting effects-erectile dysfunction and memory loss
You've talked about it ad nauseum, and it's just not that important. Zone 2 is where unfit people to start, and fit people recover. That's it. The goal should be to be in zone 2 as little as is necessary.
Loved seeing you on Fox News last night!! 😊❤
Dr, Atia is very smart and knowledgeable. However, I agree with all the comments below. I am sorry to see him feel uncomfortable if he is not the authority . He asks for an opinion, but feels the need to interject his views. Really too bad.
Allow the guy to answer....
Add 1 mile to your daily run every time Peter interrupts his guests.
Thank God for subtitles or I would not catch a word.
Peter can be so out of touch with people. His training volume is 10 hours per week and he calls that “low.” C’mon, man.
We agree that he is bragging, right? Drops numbers. Something like 2h 5 days a week is low, compared to his heyday of course. Numbers are still true I think, dude is a real workhorse I’d guess. But he’s bragging.
Bro what? That’s a little over an hour a day 😂💀 bro is blown away by the bare minimum
How many hours of video games do you play a week?
Peter is definitely not out of touch with people. Everything he teaches he also teaches how to scale it down. I’ve watched probably 50 to 100 of his videos and think that they have been absolutely fantastic. I wouldn’t be so quick to criticize.
Peters Attia’s zone 2 is on the envelope of 3 watts/kg?!?!? Sweet fancy Moses! My FTP is 3 watts/kg, and I’m at lactate of 8 mmole. Dr Attia is in amazing shape or I’m in terrible shape. #KickAss100YrOld.
Peter, let him talk!!! What a terrible interviewer OH MY GAWD...
Peter Attia has high profile guests on his show to say "yes Peter I agree with you" so he can go back to his clients / customers and overcharge them for his bullsh1t therapies.
The whole podcast is a front to pump his business.
I was planning on trying to take beta blockers and doing zone 2 training but Noemi dont have to thank god😂
The way Peter talks in seems like he does not understand that talking affects the way you breathe, which affects your heart beat.
Zone 2 training seems controversial, at least according to Rhonda Patrick.
😂 Not simple for me 😅
No, the ability to talk is a very important point. San Millan can be a bit vague
1,5 w/kg is under zone 1 🤔
Oh no let him finish
Bro wtf is this superimpose the back of your head in attempt to seem in person. Weird. Wondered why the audio levels were so shitty initially.
San Milan never answered the question!!!!!
Dude watch Rogan interview and repeat it. Be more like Rogan. You can see the wheels turning as to when you can jump in and talk about yourself
Jesus Christ! Let your guest speak ffs. What's the point of having a conversation if you're gonna monologue anyway 🤦🙈🤕
Here to say, fck Zone 2
Gostaria de ouvir o convidado (entrevistado) e não o entrevistador, isso para mim foi um monólogo, chato e cansativo e com interrupções horríveis. Assunto interessante mas o entrevistador quer aparecer mais que o convidado. HORRÍVEL!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jesus Christ this is impossible to watch with Peter’s constant interruptions.
I'm not sure you needed the guest. Just talk to yourself! What a waste and plain rude.
Do everyone a favor and have Stanford's, Professor Christopher Gardner on your podcast to talk about daily protein requirements. Enough with "eat a cow and call me in the morning", Don Layman.
Christopher Gardner's goals (and his followers' goals) are not solid athletism at 70, running after grandkids at age 80, hiking at age 90, etc. This channel is for people who are interested in those kind of things. So this channel is not the right place for Christopher Gardner.
In fact, he mentions in one of his lectures that he knows a football player that eats obscene amounts of per day but that's not his topic to cover.
then why dont u call him to your podcast?
o wait, u don't have one
even if u started one, who the fuk's gonna watch🥴
so let the professionals do their thing
Chill man. Gardners requirements don’t fit my personal goals, however I think it would be interesting to see someone that is on the higher end of protein intake and advice discuss protein requirement for people with different goals as I do think there is a bit of confusion with the idea of muscle mass, strength, and aging. Having strong, lean muscle mass vs bulking hypertrophy mass are two different things for aging. Building muscle vs building strength and how those relate to eachother in aging are also nuances that should be further discussed. If your muscle mass stays the same, but you double your strength, that’s probably better than building a lot of muscle with not as much strength, etc.