China vows severe retaliation after Biden imposes huge tariffs on EVs & batteries

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 14 май 2024
  • China vows severe retaliation after Biden imposes huge tariffs on EVs & batteries
    👇👇 Buy something and support The Electric Viking Store 👇👇
    shop.theelectricviking.com/
    Size guide and other help for the store 👇
    theelectricviking.com/the-ele...
    🔔 Subscribe and hit the notification bell! ► / @electricviking
    Join me on Patreon ► / theelectricviking
    Join as a member in The Electric Viking RUclips►
    / @electricviking
    Members-only videos (see videos before anyone else)►
    • Members-only videos
    👇 Please donate here for Shanna (Viking's wife) if you can 👇
    gofund.me/ef6650d7
    See what happened to Shanna:
    • Stage 4 can go to hell...
    The Electric Viking on other platforms:
    Rumble ► rumble.com/c/TheElectricViking
    Facebook page ► / theelectricvikingfb
    Facebook group ► / theevfbgroup
    Twitter ► / theevking
    Instagram ► / theelectricvking
    Pinterest ► / theelectricviking
    Telegram ► t.me/theelectricviking
    TikTok ► / theelectricviking
    👇 See more about me 👇
    • You've been asking; he...
    👇 My Bali trip 👇
    • I went to Indonesia an...
    👇 Video about My Skateboard 👇
    • EASIEST & cheapest way...
    👇 Subscribe to my kids channel 👇
    tinyurl.com/subscribetojackan...
    See more videos:
    China’s Car exports skyrocket as Electrified cars approach 50% market share
    • China’s Car exports sk...
    Chinese EV maker Zeekr soars 35% after US stockmarket debut
    • Chinese EV maker Zeekr...
    Tesla's China made Model 3 Performance does NOT have 50HP more
    • Tesla's China made Mod...
    Tesla Cybertrucks seized at Russian border - drivers accused of illegal smuggling
    • Tesla Cybertrucks seiz...
    Tesla Cyberhammer goes on sale for $700 - I tried to buy one and failed...
    • Tesla Cyberhammer goes...
    Musk says Tesla spending $500M+ expanding Supercharger network this year
    • Musk says Tesla spendi...
    Europe's best selling electric cars in 2024 - Volvo rises to take on Tesla
    • Europe's best selling ...
    Elon Musk offered Warren Buffett part ownership of Tesla at $200M valuation
    • Elon Musk offered Warr...
    Tesla Robotaxi service could launch in China within months say insiders
    • Tesla Robotaxi service...
    Ford Mustang driver intentionally smashes into a Tesla Cybetruck, drives off
    • Ford Mustang driver in...
    Warren Buffett says Tesla FSD is good for society, bad for Insurance companies
    • Warren Buffett says Te...
    China shocked after Tesla Model Y flies through the air, rolling over 7 times
    • China shocked after Te...
    Tesla reveals video of Optimus Humanoid robot sorting 4680 battery cells
    • Tesla reveals video of...
    Tesla’s NEW Dojo AI super-chip will be 40 times more powerful
    • Tesla’s NEW Dojo AI su...
    Elon Musk reveals Tesla will unlock 60 miles more range for existing owners
    • Elon Musk reveals Tesl...
    Real TRUTH to Reuters claim Tesla scrapped Megacasting & Unboxed production
    • Real TRUTH to Reuters ...
    Musk's visit to China was a much-needed win for Tesla - but India is mad
    • Musk's visit to China ...
    Tesla's board and Elon Musk are 'all in' on Tony Seba's WILDEST prediction
    • Tesla's board and Elon...
    Mega battery built at demolished coal power plant in California will save billions
    • Mega battery built at ...
    Co-founder of FB claims Tesla will go bankrupt & Musk will be jailed for fraud
    • Co-founder of FB claim...
    Tesla megapacks deployed to build the biggest battery in Australian history
    • Tesla megapacks deploy...
    Tesla selling inventory Model Y for $39,000 and Model 3 from $35,000
    • Tesla selling inventor...
    Tesla’s new CHEAP models will be modified versions of Model 3 and Model Y
    • Tesla’s new CHEAP mode...
    #chineseev #joebiden #tariffs #batteries #evnews
    👇Reference to the news/charts & videos used in this video:
    cnevpost.com/2024/05/14/us-an...
    www.autonews.com/manufacturin...
    This channel may use some copyrighted materials without specific authorization of the owner; but content used here falls under the “Fair Use” Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976.
    Allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
    Contact us for any copyright issues. If you want a credit of any footage we are using, please let us know.
    Website: theelectricviking.com/contact/
    Email: contact@theelectricviking.com

Комментарии • 1,4 тыс.

  • @hunati31
    @hunati31 19 дней назад +81

    This is not tariffs on China, this is taxation of American consumers....

    • @MauriceOldis
      @MauriceOldis 16 дней назад +6

      except Americans dont "consume" Chinese cars!!!

    • @starman275
      @starman275 16 дней назад +10

      @@MauriceOldis you used chinese parts in your cars, you dont need to buy chiense products to buy chinese things, even your US made has chinese parts

    • @JaceTran
      @JaceTran 15 дней назад +9

      @@MauriceOldisEvs are different today! Chinese EVs are good enough for Biden to be scared.

    • @jennylee685
      @jennylee685 13 дней назад +4

      @@JaceTranBiden offers US consumers $ 5,000 rebates on U.S. owned cars that have no Chinese made components or parts in it at all.

    • @user-kx7iz6qk6b
      @user-kx7iz6qk6b 13 дней назад

      ​@@jennylee685isn't 7000

  • @TheKnutselaar
    @TheKnutselaar 20 дней назад +79

    These ev taxes are not to protect tesla/ev manufacturing, they are to protect legacy ice/hybrid.

    • @tedmoss
      @tedmoss 19 дней назад +1

      Look to the future, not the past. Its all manufacturing, not just cars. There is a big market outside the U.S., but no money to buy.

    • @cool2180
      @cool2180 19 дней назад +3

      protecting...lol. protecting crappy cars lol

    • @etow8034
      @etow8034 19 дней назад +3

      @@cool2180 Expensive crappy cars !

    • @cool2180
      @cool2180 19 дней назад

      @@etow8034 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @funkibudentertainment3689
      @funkibudentertainment3689 15 дней назад

      Legacy ice cars provide a lot of jobs in USA. You wish the Chinese to benefit against the USA? What happened to Nokia and Ericsson should not happen to the USA auto industry

  • @ChrisR-xs9wp
    @ChrisR-xs9wp 20 дней назад +144

    Purely political. You can't "tariff" your way to efficiency. Will legacy automakers use this as an opportunity to catch up? Don't count on it.

    • @etow8034
      @etow8034 19 дней назад

      More like they can't tariff their way into higher IQ ! The average American IQ is in decline from 100 to 92 and the leaders Americans elect proves that point ! ...LoL

    • @styx1272
      @styx1272 19 дней назад

      The USA is politically economically and socially disintegrating . Having the dollar as worlds printing press is the only thing from preventing society from collapsing.

    • @hwirtwirt4500
      @hwirtwirt4500 19 дней назад +1

      Meanwhile: Putin Thanks China for Having His Back During Ukraine War. The Tesla/China Viking approves.

    • @MetaView7
      @MetaView7 19 дней назад +12

      @@hwirtwirt4500 they have a non-interference policy. They don't care. They focus on trade, and that's it.

    • @oxaile4021
      @oxaile4021 19 дней назад

      They will use this as an opportunity to sell ICE vehicles for few years longer before going bankrupt.

  • @buixote
    @buixote 20 дней назад +192

    Our so-called leaders thought "free trade" was great when they were shipping our jobs overseas. Now when it comes to protecting Legacy Auto who have been too slow to move to EVs, Uncle Sam Swings into Action, raising prices for consumers.

    • @chillfluencer
      @chillfluencer 20 дней назад

      How come Republicans are for that, too? - since they always rile against big government.

    • @JustxLiving909
      @JustxLiving909 20 дней назад

      It’s funny when you think about it the tariffs are really taxing the Americans not the Chinese

    • @donblythe3766
      @donblythe3766 20 дней назад +2

      Better late than never

    • @nfzeta128
      @nfzeta128 20 дней назад +12

      @@donblythe3766 This won't change anything though. The legacy makers will still drag their feet.

    • @nfzeta128
      @nfzeta128 20 дней назад +4

      The thing about it. Shipping the jobs overseas to save on costs is exactly what lead to this. There was hardly any investment in R&D because it's not as cost effective.

  • @TheMighty_T
    @TheMighty_T 20 дней назад +143

    It's a problem decades in the making. China "opened up" to western companies, allowing record profits while weakening domestic economic resilience in those western countries. Global consumers got cheaper stuff, which we all like. All that was fine while we all got along, but now the gloves are coming off, everyone freaks out and it will be economically messy. War sucks.

    • @JoeyBlogs007
      @JoeyBlogs007 20 дней назад +1

      ? This is why the west should never do business with the China, the slave labour hub. Their language is that of a combative totalitarian dictatorship, ready to wage war on the west.

    • @michaelnurse9089
      @michaelnurse9089 20 дней назад

      The thing is China always saw trade with the US as part of a forever war against the West. The subsidize as much as they can while they steal as much technology as they can.

    • @DK-ev9dg
      @DK-ev9dg 20 дней назад

      USA never gets along with China

    • @bikashkr.choudhary4572
      @bikashkr.choudhary4572 20 дней назад +16

      I think it's good step..... how china is behaving in South China sea is very concerning only foolish will depend on china.

    • @JohnSchuetz-js7lk
      @JohnSchuetz-js7lk 20 дней назад +16

      Should have been done 40 years ago. Should never have gotten to where its all at today.

  • @syletie
    @syletie 20 дней назад +26

    This is just like U.S.-Japan Semiconductor Trade war in 1986. After few years later , the market been reopened, and then 99% of US DRAM makers are went to bankrupted.

    • @tooltalk
      @tooltalk 19 дней назад +2

      Their DRAM, display businesses went to South Korea wheras their logic business went to Taiwan.

  • @maynotbe
    @maynotbe 20 дней назад +164

    i think China should start with banning iphones, Starbucks, McDonald's, Ford, soybeans, corn, j&j, proctor & gamble, then we'll see what happens😅

    • @InformedKiwi
      @InformedKiwi 20 дней назад +15

      You could get your wish. See all those stocks plummet

    • @JoeyBlogs007
      @JoeyBlogs007 20 дней назад +13

      Sounds good. They can use cruddy Chinese designs instead.

    • @G41251
      @G41251 20 дней назад

      Globalism is OVER. Soon the majority of the trade for America will be with Canada and Mexico. The cost of shipping on cargo ships is going to skyrocket. The America’s have an abundance of natural resources and trained labor pools.

    • @boembo6627
      @boembo6627 20 дней назад +7

      Poor old China, how will they cope! Ffs

    • @IamHandsome4u
      @IamHandsome4u 20 дней назад

      Remember Buick, its literally surviving bcs of china, 80% of buicks are sold in china.

  • @jasoncummings7052
    @jasoncummings7052 20 дней назад +143

    Most Americans will NOT be able to afford USA made EV's.

    • @XinaCCPFreeTibet
      @XinaCCPFreeTibet 20 дней назад +20

      So true, is that why they all drive $70,000 pickup and SUVs? Obviously they can’t afford a Chevy Blazer EV at $40,000. You make such good sense.

    • @randalkingery4281
      @randalkingery4281 20 дней назад +3

      This is true, I'm hanging on to my 04 Siena and 04 4runner for as long as I can. Would love a Tesla, maybe when the stock goes 10x.

    • @ozzitor8
      @ozzitor8 20 дней назад +5

      That’s their intention. Once again, they want to kill the electric car.

    • @tooltalk
      @tooltalk 20 дней назад +11

      hate to disappoint you, but the average cost of EVs in the US is already down from $61K in 2022 to $53K in 2023. And it will continue to get cheaper with/without China.

    • @tooltalk
      @tooltalk 20 дней назад +1

      LOL oomaoo with fake western name handle..

  • @glasperlinspiel
    @glasperlinspiel 20 дней назад +88

    Follow the money. This only benefits petro-corporations and ICE.

    • @mikewallace8087
      @mikewallace8087 20 дней назад

      Paint the path or zip it.

    • @huckleberryfinn6578
      @huckleberryfinn6578 20 дней назад +3

      Not only. This will only benefit American EV, battery, mining and refinery companies as well.

    • @justinr9753
      @justinr9753 20 дней назад +3

      Joe needs the auto manufacturing on his side, that's all.

    • @tedmoss
      @tedmoss 19 дней назад

      @@huckleberryfinn6578 There is very little benefit to go around.

    • @NiejakiDD
      @NiejakiDD 19 дней назад

      I agree partially. This move is aimed to help sinking, heavily indebted Ford and GM , and to slow down progress of Tesla. But it will effective only on NAFTA market.
      However, this won't slow down China. In contrary - the Chinese producers will conquer global market more easily.

  • @ciybersal3499
    @ciybersal3499 20 дней назад +131

    The two parties in America are both atrocious for Americans

    • @donblythe3766
      @donblythe3766 20 дней назад

      I'll take two parties any day over the one party communist dictatorships that exists in China and Russia. Zero individual freedom is the Chinese way of life

    • @chaoskid1211
      @chaoskid1211 20 дней назад

      Oh yeah, and there is more than two parties, commie.

    • @j.kimmer1509
      @j.kimmer1509 20 дней назад

      No MORONS who vote for Commies/Socialist/Muslims for Government office are atrocious to America. Get your intelligence on track.

    • @verypleasantguy
      @verypleasantguy 20 дней назад

      If what you say is true, why then the Americans still continue to support them ?
      Are the Americans all infected with the *_Stockholm syndrome_*_ ??_

    • @JoeyBlogs007
      @JoeyBlogs007 20 дней назад +1

      No they are smart. This is why the west should never do business with the China, the slave labour hub. Their language is that of a combative totalitarian dictatorship, ready to wage war on the west.

  • @ecarpo3479
    @ecarpo3479 19 дней назад +17

    The US accelerating it's inevitable decline.

  • @GabrielSBarbaraS
    @GabrielSBarbaraS 20 дней назад +34

    The only unfair economic practices I am aware of is the inefficiencies of US legacy automakers. It is sad we have let our automotive industry to fail , just like we did with the steel industry back in the 1980's

    • @huckleberryfinn6578
      @huckleberryfinn6578 20 дней назад +2

      Because of cheap labor in China and SEA. That's obviously about to change with the tariffs.

    • @GabrielSBarbaraS
      @GabrielSBarbaraS 20 дней назад

      @@huckleberryfinn6578 I am starting to believe, China automakers should raise their prices to come close to American prices and use the extra money to build up dealership and repair shops. That way the US government does not raise tariffs and who know where the money goes.

    • @larryc1616
      @larryc1616 20 дней назад +1

      Goodbye legacy auto. Blockbuster and Kodak here we come!

    • @hwirtwirt4500
      @hwirtwirt4500 19 дней назад +2

      China bot attack.

    • @dzonikg
      @dzonikg 18 дней назад

      ITs funny how USA talks aboud subisides ,just 2 so call BIg 3 (Ford ,GM ,Cruysler ) USA gived 170 BILION $ in 2008-2010 ,just FORD ALONE was making 30 billion $ loss every year .IF USA was for "Free market " that companies would be bankrupt long time ago

  • @GFY11
    @GFY11 20 дней назад +119

    Even AI cannot make up for the stupidity of Americas leaders

    • @chaoskid1211
      @chaoskid1211 20 дней назад

      Thumbs up and no reply? Hahahahaahhaha. Come and try to take our guns commie.

    • @verypleasantguy
      @verypleasantguy 20 дней назад +5

      They Are Not Stupid
      They Have To Obey Their *MASTER* !!!

    • @2funny269
      @2funny269 20 дней назад

      just one look at the playlists on your channel, explains how and why you hate the USA

    • @francismarion6400
      @francismarion6400 20 дней назад

      UN leaders run this S### show!

    • @JoeyBlogs007
      @JoeyBlogs007 20 дней назад +1

      AI would have sent nukes flying ?

  • @dt12155
    @dt12155 20 дней назад +107

    Sam, give us the evidence that China is selling below the cost. You can do this in a promotion in a country for a short period of time but you can’t do it for years and years in the whole world.
    Take for example a toaster, it used to cost an arm and a leg and after we got them from China it cost around $10! Same with clothes even many of the clothes now are not from China. Do you mean that Bangladeshi, Vietnam, India etc are selling below cost also? Please do a detailed cost analysis and provide the details. I always question myself how a toaster can be made that cheap considering all the metals, plastic, rubber, paper, ink etc have to be dug, extracted, produced, transported, processed, made in parts, transported again, assembled, packed, warehoused, more transported, more warehoused etc and then all the overhead and profit from all ends. The world has been selling toasters at this cheap price since China started to make toasters and nobody talks about selling below cost and overcapacity! I am still wondering and asking!?!
    Can China subsidising the whole world for toasters? For irons? For kettles? For electric appliances? For electronics? For toys? Etc. All businesses have to make a profit and China has to make a profit to stay in business.
    I am still wondering and asking. So please show me the facts and figures on production costs and not just statistics and deductions. I really want to know. Thank you.

    • @verypleasantguy
      @verypleasantguy 20 дней назад

      _"*Sam, give us the evidence that China is selling below the cost*"_
      That fella is a hard core anti-Chinese.
      He got caught accusing China for things that China never did, *_many times_* , but he just doesn't care, and is still doing it !

    • @roddiechan
      @roddiechan 20 дней назад +23

      He Just blah blah blah sometimes😂😂

    • @directxxxx71
      @directxxxx71 20 дней назад +25

      Sometimes the little BBC/Sky News fed 🤡 inside of him just comes out once in a while 😂😂😂

    • @hwirtwirt4500
      @hwirtwirt4500 20 дней назад

      Sam is a Tesla shill and Tesla uses Chinese manufactured batteries. Sam's just doing his part for Musk.

    • @Ilus01
      @Ilus01 20 дней назад +26

      In his mind only the west are entitled to play by their books which they wrote them but the Chinese can’t write it’s own books and play by it. Sadly it’s the mentality of majority of westerners until they figured out their own books(wto/free trade) sucks.

  • @chassdesk
    @chassdesk 20 дней назад +14

    40% cheaper solar in Australia wow nice. ❤

  • @nerdbikes3841
    @nerdbikes3841 20 дней назад +8

    American cars in general are about to get much more expensive. GM, Ford- everyone will jack up prices knowing that the Chinese are locked out. We’ve been through this same thing before numerous times… back in the 1980’s the tariffs were against Japan as Toyota and other carmakers started coming over to the US in a big way.. these tariffs only cause prices to go up up up on ALL cars, not just increase battery prices.

  • @stevenbarrett7648
    @stevenbarrett7648 20 дней назад +9

    We all wanted the cheaper priced goods, cars, TV’s, everything from washing machines to radio’s so having sowed the wind now we are all reaping the whirlwind and not liking it. Sadly we’ve thrown away our tools and knowledge so its going to be a very hard climb to get back to making stuff for ourselves

    • @bobsmith3983
      @bobsmith3983 10 дней назад

      The USA won't be able to make the stuff themselves as the knowledge has been shipped overseas to low labor cost countries. You will just end up paying higher prices for the same imported products and the US government will be laughing due to all the revenue it will get from the tariffs which they will spend on weapons for Youkrain making the MIC even more wealthy and the average citizen poorer.

  • @gregsutton2400
    @gregsutton2400 20 дней назад +10

    How do you do business with such rabid government decisions.

  • @basque888
    @basque888 20 дней назад +14

    BYD already started building factories in Bahia, Brazil. If any cars go to the US in future, it'll be from Brazil and not from China. Similar to what Tesla Shanghai does for Asia market.

    • @huckleberryfinn6578
      @huckleberryfinn6578 20 дней назад

      Then the US will put tariffs on all Chinese companies, even if they are manufacturing abroad.

    • @basque888
      @basque888 20 дней назад

      China already prepared for this with BRI projects. They have a new cargo Megaport open this year in Chancay, Peru which will later link directly to Brazil. It means China to Brazil no longer has to pass thru the Panama Canal, cutting the journey time by two weeks.

    • @basque888
      @basque888 20 дней назад +1

      ​@@huckleberryfinn6578 Then it's not tariffs. Tariffs are put on products not companies. They can of course ban the company, similar to Huawei, but that would be a different thing altogether. Tariffs on a Brazilian manufactured BYD product is an issue between Brazil and the United States government.
      Similarly a Toyota Yaris manufactured in Spain, entering the US is based on trade terms between the EU and United States, and does not concern Japan.

    • @larryc1616
      @larryc1616 20 дней назад

      China plans far into the future unlike the US short sighted, short gains. China plays chess while US plays checkers. Same reason TSMC is #1 while Intel continues to slowly die a #3.

    • @hwirtwirt4500
      @hwirtwirt4500 19 дней назад

      @@basque888 Products containing parts manufactured in China. Game over.

  • @nick0047
    @nick0047 19 дней назад +3

    Many media services in Australia are doing the same time to swing to honest media outlets! Keep it up Electric Viking!

  • @chengzhang-dl9yi
    @chengzhang-dl9yi 20 дней назад +10

    中国出口到美国的商品,很多实际是美国的品牌,中国只是提供加工组装而已,实际中美贸易逆差远没数据那么大。所以美国也没有多少牌可以打

  • @ianburnett4605
    @ianburnett4605 19 дней назад +21

    6% of earths population thinking they are 96%.

    • @melchoirhenry1108
      @melchoirhenry1108 15 дней назад +2

      Beautifully said 👏

    • @jennylee685
      @jennylee685 13 дней назад

      lol, that’s the truth. Those same 6% (the gov’t) thinks they run the rest of the world too!

  • @allenaxp6259
    @allenaxp6259 13 дней назад +2

    Agree with your comments. Tariffs are needed in certain areas to compete with China.

  • @davidkwan6522
    @davidkwan6522 20 дней назад +8

    The reality is the cost base in China is much lower than other countries.

    • @user-vp6vf8wm2s
      @user-vp6vf8wm2s 19 дней назад

      Cost base? More like profit base

    • @bobsmith3983
      @bobsmith3983 10 дней назад

      Plus the supply chain is complete and efficient.

  • @i6power30
    @i6power30 20 дней назад +33

    We can still get CATL battery Tesla in Canada yay

    • @guyboisvert66
      @guyboisvert66 20 дней назад

      Hope it'll still be avail in December when i'll change my TM3...

    • @ericyuan9718
      @ericyuan9718 20 дней назад

      Castreau has sold out the country to China years ago.

    • @arthurkirsch8188
      @arthurkirsch8188 20 дней назад

      The new 100% tariff includes lithium ion batteries but I didn’t hear anything about lfp batteries. Can that be right.

    • @larryc1616
      @larryc1616 20 дней назад

      ​@@arthurkirsch8188all ev batteries

    • @larsnystrom6698
      @larsnystrom6698 18 дней назад

      Aren't they too produced in the US?

  • @PapaPiggie
    @PapaPiggie 20 дней назад +72

    Tariffs won’t hurt China, they can export to the rest of the world. Tariffs won’t help domestic auto, as they knew this day was coming for a decade. After all us auto has plants in China for a decade or longer. They are intentionally procrastinating to keep making money off ICE cars. Jim Farley admitted it when he said he was scaling back EV because they cost him money.
    Who loses? America consumer pays more after corporations made money selling cheaper Chinese goods for years. I hope this backfires big time . Worker won’t benefit because they will be fired in the end from companies going bankrupt or them out of touch not knowing how to make EVs

    • @jasonlucas2328
      @jasonlucas2328 20 дней назад +8

      When UPS drivers get $170,000 a year to deliver a package, a unionized autoworker makes $100 an hour, and a fast food worker's wage is $20, how can we expect low-cost manufacturing?

    • @nrakma
      @nrakma 20 дней назад

      Every Goper loved when Rump imposed Tariffs on China, but not now? Do they now Love China more than America?

    • @satay8167
      @satay8167 20 дней назад +1

      True. But other countries can follow us to raise tariff on Chinese import especially those us cohorts

    • @taylorc2542
      @taylorc2542 20 дней назад

      They required joint ventures.

    • @beautifulgirl219
      @beautifulgirl219 19 дней назад +4

      That's illogical Mr. Jinping. The U.S. is 1/3 of the global market. American domestic auto on a more level playing field has a CHANCE to compete.It does not have a reasonable chance against a subsidized product sold below cost until the industry captures a market which results in domestic production disappearance. Knowing something is coming has no relevance even in the abstract, much less in this specific instance. Also irrelevant to the points discussed is the correct assertion that legacy auto is taking the short term profit option of trying to perpetuate ICE sales, a failed strategy as a long-term strategy. American consumers gain infinitely more with good paying jobs manufacturing the best BEVs on Earth, as TESLA does today. Legacy auto merely has to stop perseverating with a lazy and self-indulgent short-term strategy and they can rival Tesla in every respect, merely by more or less copying the organization from top to bottom, absent the eccentric politics of Tesla's CEO. Let's be objective instead of confused with emotion and disillusionment.

  • @rockycata6078
    @rockycata6078 19 дней назад +4

    Told you Viking ...China will retaliate, and the easiest way is to 'abandon' ICE car PARTS, or heavy price increases for Ford/Chevy/Stellantis parts. US consumers will pay dearly to get their ICE cars repaired, and those 'warranty' repairs for new cars will be delayed for parts. Every factory in China producing anything for US manufacturers will be scrutinized by Beijing to put maximum pressure on US consumers to increase inflation. "Tit-for-Tat" is the new Chinese proverb/policy, and now the "steel hand"[Deng/UN/1985] comes out of the velvet glove. Not yet a hot war, but this trade war is just getting started.

    • @saleh45251
      @saleh45251 19 дней назад

      i like it...steel hand comes out of velvet glove!

    • @dvader3263
      @dvader3263 19 дней назад

      Reserve a Model Y or purchase one at .99% interest this month and also save $200-300 per month for each vehicle in the family with no need to purchase gasoline.
      No oil changes, no brake wear, no catalytic converter thefts. And no gas station visits. Charge it while you're sleeping.

  • @desmondho9567
    @desmondho9567 19 дней назад +16

    The world 🌎🌍🌏 has 8 billions of people.
    U ash has 330,000,000 citizens.
    Europe plus allies has 600,000,000 citizens.
    China is trading with the other 7 billions population around the world. Like in Latin America, Africa Union countries, Middle East countries, Central asia countries and Asian countries. So, what how China overcapacity. ❤❤❤

    • @pviveknair
      @pviveknair 14 дней назад +1

      Margins are too low in the other 7 billion populations, which will not be enough for future R&D and growth. And right now, China needs high returns on their investments that has been accruing interest. Also, the salaries in China has gone off the roof. It is a perfect storm. The US & Europe does not need to win this trade battle, just need to extend it indefinitely.

    • @user-ew5eh2co5p
      @user-ew5eh2co5p 11 дней назад

      @@pviveknair as long as China makes money, they don’t care. The ‘west’ will ultimately suffer.

  • @jimdetry9420
    @jimdetry9420 20 дней назад +10

    I think the tariffs are to help the US legacy companies (and their unions) compete.

    • @zoransarin5411
      @zoransarin5411 19 дней назад +1

      Many western automakers make a large percentage of their profit from their operations in China. I believe it is approximately 50% of The VW Groups profits. The potential for retaliation is scaring the Europeans and so they are making noise about tariffs but haven’t done anything as yet. I think we are about to find out the repercussions to the US automakers in China.

    • @longcheng-ug7rr
      @longcheng-ug7rr 17 дней назад

      Does the United States have China's new energy vehicles?

    • @bobsmith3983
      @bobsmith3983 10 дней назад

      It won't help as even with the tariffs it's still cheaper to buy from China than to make locally. The end effect is the US consumer will pay more for everything.

    • @jimdetry9420
      @jimdetry9420 10 дней назад

      @@bobsmith3983 I didn't say it would work but it's obvious everything Biden does is to support union factorties.

  • @thomassimmer5186
    @thomassimmer5186 20 дней назад +53

    The tariffs will not help US industry. Besides losing the win-win consequence of international trade through comparative advantage, besides the increase in price of non-imported goods which were already being made in the country, there is the effect on behavior when industries no longer have to be as efficient. Like the tariffs that brought on the great depression, these will harm economic activity.

    • @ObiePaddles
      @ObiePaddles 19 дней назад +4

      Tarifs always economically hurt both countries. There are good reasons for tariffs like security, but economics is not one of them.

    • @user-kx7iz6qk6b
      @user-kx7iz6qk6b 13 дней назад

      Wrong, the tarrifs are because of the of the unfair practices on trading, period. Teslas suck shit perios.

    • @user-xp7nk9dw8d
      @user-xp7nk9dw8d 9 дней назад

      Tariff is admittance that usa lost to china

    • @hardy2175
      @hardy2175 6 дней назад

      You assume that China plays by the rules.

    • @ObiePaddles
      @ObiePaddles 6 дней назад

      @@hardy2175 both US and China subsidise their industry to some extent so getting a level playing field is something that I’m glad I don’t have to work on creating

  • @saleh45251
    @saleh45251 19 дней назад +2

    A big win for the oil industry + Toyotas of this world! (Temporary though IMO)...

  • @stockey
    @stockey 8 дней назад +1

    Stopping the competition with tariffs, is not very smart.

  • @jamesspent7101
    @jamesspent7101 20 дней назад +103

    The world will move forward with Chinese EVs while the USA will still be stuck choosing from cyber truck or cyber truck pro.

    • @DAVIDTATLITUG
      @DAVIDTATLITUG 19 дней назад +5

      We have Hyundai that is making it's own batteries. They are putting Tesla to shame and so is it's sister kia. These are not Chinese cars.

    • @ruskiessuck3337
      @ruskiessuck3337 19 дней назад

      Not even close. EU will bring in the same tariff rates and CCP will be forced to sell to third world crap countries with no GDP nor economy.

    • @flyinphil42
      @flyinphil42 19 дней назад +3

      Unfortunately Canada will follow the US too on this , because they are co dependants.

    • @etow8034
      @etow8034 19 дней назад +2

      ...that nobody can afford ! ...LoL

    • @Justmekpc
      @Justmekpc 19 дней назад +4

      No they won’t as the EU will also put tariffs on Chinese cars to protect their manufactures as well

  • @frankcoffey
    @frankcoffey 20 дней назад +12

    We have no room to talk about China subsidizing companies. Chinese customers bought GM vehicles like crazy even after our government bailed them out. Buick used to be a popular brand of car over there.

    • @tooltalk
      @tooltalk 20 дней назад

      Yet, no foreign battery competitors have been allowed in China's local EV market since 2016.

    • @frankcoffey
      @frankcoffey 20 дней назад +3

      @@tooltalk I don't see a need for that. They have enough supply locally and batteries are still in high demand where they are made in other countries. That's not an import situation for them and not an export situation for us.

    • @tooltalk
      @tooltalk 20 дней назад

      ​@@frankcoffeySure, there are also plenty of EVs sitting in the lot in the US too. The US doesn't have any need for Chinese EV either.

    • @tomtube1012
      @tomtube1012 19 дней назад +5

      @@tooltalk You mean there's no foreign competitor that can compete since 2016 lol.

    • @tomtube1012
      @tomtube1012 19 дней назад +3

      @@tooltalk China dominated battery production for EVs with over 83 percent of the global total. How do you explain that? lol

  • @randybeaumier
    @randybeaumier 11 дней назад +1

    I thought the Biden administration wanted us to all drive electric cars. Tarries aren’t the way to achieve that.😂

  • @thewishmastur
    @thewishmastur 19 дней назад +2

    It is all political show for their audiences. The leaders in both countries are probably laughing with each other.

  • @Harmony99Harmony
    @Harmony99Harmony 20 дней назад +25

    They say chinese products are bad and cans, why are they afraid to compete? 😁 does that means chinese products are good and cheap. 😂 😂

    • @davidbrayshaw3529
      @davidbrayshaw3529 20 дней назад +1

      There's a reason that Tesla is using BYD and CATL batteries. BYD was a battery company before Tarpenning and Eberhard had even thought about building Tesla.
      The 4680 is a flop. This is a killer for Tesla.

    • @huckleberryfinn6578
      @huckleberryfinn6578 20 дней назад +1

      @@davidbrayshaw3529 It's not a killer for Tesla. It will boost domestic production, not only for Tesla.

    • @davidbrayshaw3529
      @davidbrayshaw3529 19 дней назад

      @@huckleberryfinn6578 What raw materials come out of Chinese controlled mines?
      Lithium?

    • @larsnystrom6698
      @larsnystrom6698 18 дней назад

      @@davidbrayshaw3529
      Oh, Tesla is working on getting the cost of 4680 down to the level of the Chinese batteries.
      They will get there, eventually!
      Not a success yet, but maybe not a flop either, if they get there.

    • @bobsmith3983
      @bobsmith3983 10 дней назад

      @@larsnystrom6698 If the batteries are made in the USA the cost will never rival those made in China.

  • @barrellcooper6490
    @barrellcooper6490 19 дней назад +3

    FWIW worked at 7 different factories in 6 different states from 84 to 2002. As of a couple years ago all had closed. Much of the production moved to Mexico. Thank you NAFTA.

    • @bobsmith3983
      @bobsmith3983 10 дней назад

      Watch out Mexico the USA is coming for you too.

  • @Cfb2987
    @Cfb2987 9 дней назад

    Really glad I found this channel. Everything I’ve seen on RUclips about China so far has been way too extreme in a pro or anti stance. I like how this channel acknowledges pros and cons to China’s approach to conducting global commerce.

  • @mortensen117
    @mortensen117 19 дней назад +2

    Support what you believe in, don't limit what you don't believe in - use affirmative action, not war.
    Restrictions promote nothing to do with progress.

  • @Wavetheory85
    @Wavetheory85 19 дней назад +26

    Completely disagree. Wrong for trump to start it. Wrong for Biden to escalate.

    • @Savory678
      @Savory678 19 дней назад

      Yip just let China take over right?

  • @hamsterg0d
    @hamsterg0d 20 дней назад +12

    It is not good for U.S. manufacturing in the long term. It will render it noncompetitive in the international market just like the Jones Act does with the U.S. shipping industry. Learn basic economics.

  • @mauriceharting5877
    @mauriceharting5877 18 дней назад +2

    There is free trade and there is fair trade. Free trade is where all countries do not impose trade restrictions that have a negative impact on trading partners, whereas fair trade looks at a balance between imports and exports between countries.
    China and India in particular are notorious for creating unfair trading practices where they export more than they import in dollar value.
    When these two countries in particular do that it hurts local businesses in competing countries. Dumping artificially low priced goods and services into the Western world hurts local businesses in the Western world.
    Taxation and tariffs are a fair way of dealing with artificially cheap products being imported into the West from places like China and India.
    Poor labour standards, cheap labour rates, and weak environmental rules also give China and India a competitive advantage.

  • @endodevices8129
    @endodevices8129 19 дней назад +2

    The US government bailed out the legacy auto maker previously.
    So, now they have to do it "again" ??!!!

    • @hwirtwirt4500
      @hwirtwirt4500 19 дней назад

      PRC auto makers are owned by the government.

  • @stargazer3828
    @stargazer3828 20 дней назад +12

    The increased tariffs on Chinese imports will hopefully spur innovation from US companies who want to compete with the Chinese. My fear for the OEM automakers is that a decrease in competition will only make them drag their feet to innovate and just continue with business as usual.

    • @nfzeta128
      @nfzeta128 20 дней назад +1

      This is the most likely scenario unfortunately. The only innovation they want is hydrogen because it still has the populace dependant on the makers and the oil/gas industry who would most likely manage the hydrogen.

    • @vlhc4642
      @vlhc4642 20 дней назад +5

      The sole purpose of tariff is so that US auto doesn't have to innovate.
      But it's funnier than that, because thanks to tariff on chips and batteries, now the only way to compete with China internationally is to build the entire car in China. US manufacturing is now DOA.

    • @100c0c
      @100c0c 20 дней назад

      ​US does not export cars like Japan or EU. That's not a problem. This is about protecting the local market from China.@@vlhc4642

    • @larryc1616
      @larryc1616 20 дней назад +1

      Consumers will pay 2-4x more for same products not made in China

    • @vlhc4642
      @vlhc4642 19 дней назад +2

      @@larryc1616 If anyone's willing to pay more for American products there wouldn't be a need for tariffs.

  • @rambokd
    @rambokd 20 дней назад +7

    So I think Chinese plants in Mexico and Canada will be exempt due to the trade agreements. Thus incentivizing growth in those two countries.

    • @hwirtwirt4500
      @hwirtwirt4500 20 дней назад

      Depends on the content of the vehicles and where that content is manufactured.

    • @larryc1616
      @larryc1616 20 дней назад

      Yes through NAFTA

    • @hwirtwirt4500
      @hwirtwirt4500 19 дней назад +1

      @@larryc1616 PRC is not a member of NAFTA.

    • @larryc1616
      @larryc1616 19 дней назад

      @@hwirtwirt4500 the only members of NAFTA are US, Mexico and Canada

  • @chaoskid1211
    @chaoskid1211 20 дней назад +25

    Hey Viking, blink if your being held hostage. 😂

    • @XinaCCPFreeTibet
      @XinaCCPFreeTibet 20 дней назад +2

      Nailed it. CATL writes directly to him. Check out his videos about it.

    • @kensladen
      @kensladen 20 дней назад

      What a pair of muppets

    • @chaoskid1211
      @chaoskid1211 20 дней назад +1

      @@kensladen ok 50 cent army

    • @tooltalk
      @tooltalk 20 дней назад +1

      @@XinaCCPFreeTibet Yep.. the electric/C C P Viking is notorious in the Chinese battery industry.

    • @hwirtwirt4500
      @hwirtwirt4500 20 дней назад +2

      He's acting under strict orders from the cult leader Elon.

  • @amon5124
    @amon5124 18 дней назад

    ALL THE NEW INDUSTRIAL POWERS HAVE DONE THE SAME. Thank you.

  • @kentgardiner1858
    @kentgardiner1858 19 дней назад +6

    We can't compete in the world market so we add tariffs. Sad day for the American consumer.

  • @syletie
    @syletie 20 дней назад +12

    This is only internal to American, US consumer got robbed.

    • @taylorc2542
      @taylorc2542 20 дней назад +1

      Where were you when they required joint ventures?

  • @jasoncummings7052
    @jasoncummings7052 20 дней назад +19

    Violation of International trade. Hypocrites!!!!!

  • @lfish57
    @lfish57 20 дней назад +2

    Tariffs mean more tax for consumers. Be prepare to pay more. It is almost better to live someplace else where things are affordable. Sam, I want appreciate your effort to be objective. I can read between the lines.

  • @kylerobinson7572
    @kylerobinson7572 20 дней назад +3

    Unintended consequences, poor planning!!

  • @257.4MHz
    @257.4MHz 20 дней назад +8

    4680 is back on the menu, boys!

    • @bobsmith3983
      @bobsmith3983 10 дней назад +1

      "4680 is back on the menu, boys!" So are the higher cost and fires.

  • @danielgrayling5032
    @danielgrayling5032 19 дней назад +2

    On the bright side, without US tariffs, solar panels wouldn't be so cheap in Australia and Australia is a sunnier country than America.
    Dependent on future US production, we may end up with more solar energy deployment in aggregate.

  • @IamJohnnyFan
    @IamJohnnyFan 19 дней назад +1

    NIo should just manufacture in American to avoid the tariffs. America's unemployment numbers isnt zero. Win-Win

  • @lesliecarter4295
    @lesliecarter4295 20 дней назад +28

    Europe to slap on the tariffs in the very near future.

    • @bubuneowoo6161
      @bubuneowoo6161 20 дней назад +11

      I guess BMW and Mercedes don't want the China market.

    • @verypleasantguy
      @verypleasantguy 20 дней назад

      It's the greatest irony of all time --- the people of the so-called 'democratic countries' are no longer being taken care of by their democratically elected government !

    • @Sacto1654
      @Sacto1654 20 дней назад +4

      @@bubuneowoo6161 Given the rapidly collapsing Chinese economy, I'm not surprised.

    • @neverletmego6414
      @neverletmego6414 20 дней назад

      @@Sacto1654 China's economy has been collapsing for the last 30 years

    • @timmommens901
      @timmommens901 20 дней назад +2

      ​@@Sacto1654
      Hear hear.
      If not just copying, stealing know how.

  • @mnhsty
    @mnhsty 20 дней назад +8

    Here we go. More inflation.

  • @stvybaby
    @stvybaby 7 дней назад

    The consumer loses and pays the tarrifs.

  • @kenwhitman1055
    @kenwhitman1055 19 дней назад +1

    I saw it coming Detroit is making sure they have control, short of anti dumbing as I predicted

  • @someuser7501
    @someuser7501 20 дней назад +25

    Now ironically all those people crying their Teslas have lost value are going to cheer.

    • @tedmoss
      @tedmoss 19 дней назад +1

      The only people crying are the ones that can't afford to buy a Tesla.

    • @johannesr.h.131
      @johannesr.h.131 19 дней назад

      CHINA IS THE BIGGEST MARKET FOR TESLA

    • @dzonikg
      @dzonikg 18 дней назад

      @@tedmoss I am so cry i did not bought car that can tow 80 miles

    • @bobsmith3983
      @bobsmith3983 10 дней назад

      The only people crying are the ones that own a Tesla when it comes time to replace the battery with an American made one.

  • @ricnyc2759
    @ricnyc2759 20 дней назад +11

    Tariffs = inflation.

    • @GFY11
      @GFY11 20 дней назад

      I would take tarrifs over income tax, problem is we get both and then inflation eats through the rest

    • @user-zo2pc5lu5q
      @user-zo2pc5lu5q 20 дней назад

      Those tariffs go straight to the government coffers and inflation erodes the value of their debt

    • @francismarion6400
      @francismarion6400 20 дней назад

      All for the 7% of Americans who would own an ev. This is ridiculous!

    • @huckleberryfinn6578
      @huckleberryfinn6578 20 дней назад

      @@francismarion6400 It's obvious not only about the 7% EV owners. It's about the whole EV and battery market that will grow to trillion of dollars.

    • @tooltalk
      @tooltalk 20 дней назад

      The average price of EVs in the US in 2022 $61K to $53K in 2023. Where is EV inflation?

  • @joseluisu.yulojr6618
    @joseluisu.yulojr6618 17 дней назад

    Free trade is supposed to enable the best goods at the least costs become available to people , BUT unless a country is also producing goods and services that the world buys, where will that country or its citizens get the money to buy the supposedly best goods at cheapest costs? Common sense - unless a country produces goods and servixes that bring in money, where will they get the money to import???

  • @freddietheone8067
    @freddietheone8067 19 дней назад

    The higher you build your walls, the taller I become…

  • @03mai67
    @03mai67 20 дней назад +51

    China doesn’t sell at a loss. They operate with more margins abroad. China is more automated than most countries except South Korea.

    • @03mai67
      @03mai67 20 дней назад

      Peoples don’t grasp that China buys half industrial robots and with the widespread 5G network they add another level of automation. The country is entering the 4th Industrial Revolution.

    • @hwirtwirt4500
      @hwirtwirt4500 20 дней назад +6

      They use human robots.

    • @beautifulgirl219
      @beautifulgirl219 19 дней назад +1

      False. They barely sell at all in the U.S., and even Europe is extremely limited due to the over-priced nature of China BEVs in Europe. China tries to capture markets with subsidies and losses until foreign country domestic production ceases, then raises prices. China is an enemy, not a reliable trading partner. Self-deceoption is dangerous mai.

    • @tedmoss
      @tedmoss 19 дней назад +1

      If you add up all the costs, China does indeed sell at a loss, you just don't know it. What is a loss? 200 million people out of work? No jobs for the youth?

    • @bldomain
      @bldomain 19 дней назад

      @@tedmoss In your anti China dreams, my non friend, not in the real world, China is eating your lunch because they are better. Accept it and stop crying.

  • @mnhsty
    @mnhsty 20 дней назад +11

    I’m disgusted.

  • @apsmith1635
    @apsmith1635 19 дней назад +1

    Let's make the batteries here. Much better for human rights

    • @chingtuckmeng1122
      @chingtuckmeng1122 19 дней назад

      feel your belly with h rights

    • @apsmith1635
      @apsmith1635 19 дней назад

      @@chingtuckmeng1122 it feels good to be alive. Google "China Tribunal" or maybe "Uyghur Tribunal"

  • @brunopadovani7347
    @brunopadovani7347 7 дней назад

    I agree 100% with tariffing Chinese imports.

  • @ezg8448
    @ezg8448 20 дней назад +7

    Tesla going back to Panasonic batteries? Didn't Elon tick them off many years ago by going to Chinaese batteries?
    I'm curious how this boardroom meeting will go.

    • @jeffjwatts
      @jeffjwatts 20 дней назад +6

      "I'm curious how this boardroom meeting will go."
      Probably something like this: Exec 1: "Musk is an asshole and dumped us before!" Exec 2: "The contract is worth billions." Exec 1: "I always said Musk was a great guy!"

    • @clasqm
      @clasqm 20 дней назад +1

      @@jeffjwatts Exec2: "Yes, but not at the same price as before"

    • @chaoskid1211
      @chaoskid1211 20 дней назад

      @@clasqm how do you know?

    • @davidbrayshaw3529
      @davidbrayshaw3529 20 дней назад

      @@clasqm Exec2: "Add 24%, where else can they go...China?".

    • @francismarion6400
      @francismarion6400 20 дней назад

      The resources are going to flow through China one way or the other.

  • @diablosv36
    @diablosv36 20 дней назад +7

    I don't think tarrifs are a good idea most of the time, they just make things more expensive, the last thing we should be doing is making the EV transition more expensive. Most people can always adapt and find new jobs and ways of doing things, being able to get batteries and solar as cheaply as possible is a long lasting benefit for all, where as making things more expensive to save some jobs is a very short term way of thinking.

    • @tooltalk
      @tooltalk 19 дней назад

      except that EVs getting cheaper in the US -- last year 2023, we saw a $8K drop in the average cost and they likely to drop further as the prices of battery raw materials continue to fall.

    • @diablosv36
      @diablosv36 19 дней назад

      @@tooltalk And this could put a stop to that.

  • @jimmychoi5219
    @jimmychoi5219 19 дней назад

    It’s all about the Petrodollar as US needs the world to continue to buy oil/gas preferably in US dollars

  • @johnwenzel2003
    @johnwenzel2003 20 дней назад +1

    The sad truth is that reasonable regulation/legislation is not possible in a hyper-polarized political climate.
    There are better ways but they can't even be brought to the table in the present environment.

  • @Pousada78
    @Pousada78 20 дней назад +3

    You are forgetting the battery capacity increase that is being implemented in the US and that other car manufacturers are reducing orders. so there will be batteries left for Tesla to purchase in the United States

    • @JoeyBlogs007
      @JoeyBlogs007 20 дней назад +1

      Absolutely

    • @francismarion6400
      @francismarion6400 20 дней назад +1

      How are you going to get the other 93% of Americans interested in ev's?

    • @huckleberryfinn6578
      @huckleberryfinn6578 20 дней назад +1

      @@francismarion6400 Just a matter of time and sinking costs.

  • @Sacto1654
    @Sacto1654 20 дней назад +14

    This is why I think both CATL and BYD are looking for a location for a US factory to assemble battery packs, which is _way_ less controversial than selling a full-assembled Chinese EV here. Both companies could make a lot of money selling these battery packs here.

    • @winstonyu1776
      @winstonyu1776 20 дней назад

      No, they won't. Think again, Tiktok, US will force them to sell due to "national security" reasons once they are starting to make money. They are not stupid.

    • @larryc1616
      @larryc1616 20 дней назад +5

      Mexico

    • @tooltalk
      @tooltalk 20 дней назад +2

      No they are not. They are not going to be allowed in, just the same way China never allowed foreign battery makers access to their local EV market.

    • @SirBalageG
      @SirBalageG 20 дней назад +4

      I love the idea that you could buy a car for half the price if it wasn’t for politics

    • @PETERJOHN101
      @PETERJOHN101 19 дней назад +1

      ​@@SirBalageG
      That's only because China uses child labor which is reason enough to restrict trade with them. The reason for Biden's move is protectionist on behalf of his donors.

  • @leerjet18
    @leerjet18 19 дней назад

    4:59 watching that dude put the sticker on was almost painful to see.

  • @genebaket
    @genebaket 19 дней назад

    So this is why Tesla started buying at the inventory of lithium batteries. Months ago.

  • @kradwonders
    @kradwonders 19 дней назад +3

    The problem with tariffs is that they reduce competition and innovation. A company protected by tariffs does not have to improve their products because there is little competition.

  • @knutbergan
    @knutbergan 20 дней назад +7

    I suspect the Chinese manufacturers will set up assembly plants in US as the Japanese, Korean and European manufacturer to avoid tariffs.

    • @chingtuckmeng1122
      @chingtuckmeng1122 19 дней назад +1

      dont think so, russia rings a bell. n security

    • @tooltalk
      @tooltalk 19 дней назад

      They are already in the US -- Gotion, EVE for instance already have plants in California, Alamaba via the German auto JVs.

  • @5nowChain5
    @5nowChain5 20 дней назад +2

    LiFePo4 280/300Ah cells prices are going up from the low of $32 /cell in bulk.

  • @KathrynStephanie-zy6fe
    @KathrynStephanie-zy6fe 19 дней назад

    Revux responsiveness to community feedback is an impressive aspect of its development. The proactive engagement with the community demonstrates a commitment to inclusivity and a willingness to adapt based on user input.

  • @jorual12
    @jorual12 19 дней назад +6

    The objective of tariffs is not only to protect the national industry, it is also to increase tax collection in a bankrupt and indebted country in a disguised way. The big loser is the American consumer who costs the most for everything.

  • @teebone2157
    @teebone2157 20 дней назад +5

    Tesla has spent all this time trying to lower the prices to get more customers now to have to increase prices on the batteries alone

  • @DouglasDennis-xy9io
    @DouglasDennis-xy9io 19 дней назад

    Revux has the potential to outperform many in the current market. The combination of strategic planning, innovative features, and a dedicated team positions Revux as a frontrunner for future success.

  • @markelliott3928
    @markelliott3928 20 дней назад +2

    Why doesn't Tesla buy the batteries from China having them ship to the Germany Plant then re-distributed to the US which inturn would eliminate the high cost of having then shipped directly from China.

    • @hwirtwirt4500
      @hwirtwirt4500 19 дней назад

      If only everyone was gullible enough to not see right through that.

  • @jaysu8669
    @jaysu8669 20 дней назад +17

    American are patriots, and willing to pay high prices to protect "our" national security industries, so that executives can get paid for millions. Hooray.

    • @alexpang5054
      @alexpang5054 19 дней назад

      Yup, patriotic stupidity, lets see how far that goes before the majority wake up and realize they've been butt screwed by their own government...

    • @ruskiessuck3337
      @ruskiessuck3337 19 дней назад

      Lithium is a critical DOE /Military mineral dude. Get a clue BOT

    • @tooltalk
      @tooltalk 19 дней назад

      You are not America, how would you even know that? The average price of EVs in the US dropped by $8K last year.

    • @kenoliver8913
      @kenoliver8913 19 дней назад

      If Americans were willing to pay higher prices to protect "national security industries" there would be no need for a tariff - they'd go ahead and pay the premium on the showroom floor. The whole point of a 100% tariff is to FORCE Joe Sixpack to pay double. It is quite amazing coming from the land of liberty; Americans no longer believe in competition because they think they'll lose it. It seems they are turning into a nation of whining losers.

    • @petardetar5191
      @petardetar5191 19 дней назад

      @@tooltalk The average price of cars in nAmerica is 30-50% higher than 2019, so help yourself with that 8k :)

  • @peterelliott2914
    @peterelliott2914 20 дней назад +3

    Chinese practices are unfair if you apply a western model. They are communist, the success of their companies is tied to the success of their government. The whole model is aimed at getting stuff done, being efficient and being successful. A new and improved "whole country' business model if you want to put it that way.
    Because the way China operates gives them a major advantage over the comparatively inefficient way the west operates, that is unfair.
    Should they change? No! What they do drives down the cost of producing things like EVs, solar panels, batteries, medicines and more and we should celebrate that.
    I totally understand Biden's efforts at making American goods more competitive but putting on tariffs is basically arse-about-face. He needs to be subsidising American solar panels and EVs, making them more efficient by building up infrastructure and supply lines instead of trying to hamstring the competition.

    • @larsnystrom6698
      @larsnystrom6698 18 дней назад

      Don't you find it a little odd saying "they are communists" when they are so much better businessmen than you are?

  • @barrellcooper6490
    @barrellcooper6490 19 дней назад +1

    I'm going to start laughing when Biden shows up in a MAGA hat, claiming it was his idea.

  • @konaIII
    @konaIII 6 дней назад

    30% surcharge on Apple iphones? Think that is impossible?

  • @kennytinker24
    @kennytinker24 20 дней назад +12

    Forget tariffs, just implement the same policy China has, to be sold here, 70% of it has to be made here. simple. China obviously thinks this is a fair policy, so they can not say anything if we do the same. SIMPLE.

    • @hwirtwirt4500
      @hwirtwirt4500 20 дней назад +1

      Careful, this doesn't fit the Tesla Vikings narrative.

    • @hehe-mq2bk
      @hehe-mq2bk 20 дней назад +3

      How naive are you? Do you not understand supply chains and markets?

    • @mnhsty
      @mnhsty 20 дней назад

      China did it to acquire knowledge and technology. That won’t work for us.

    • @GreenIsland38
      @GreenIsland38 20 дней назад +2

      That is not a Chinese policy !!! Western car makers produce in China because it,s much cheaper for them to do so, they then sell those cars back in Europe and the US.

    • @mnhsty
      @mnhsty 20 дней назад

      @@GreenIsland38 Our imports of cars made in China so far is minuscule, as Viking noted.

  • @HLC64
    @HLC64 20 дней назад +13

    China should also put same tax or tariff on US car component selling in China inculding Teslar GM Ford etc. Bearing in mind that they are making a lot of profit in China... Teslar makes a chunk of profit in China and see how much Teslar stock price will drop..

    • @zoransarin5411
      @zoransarin5411 19 дней назад +1

      Who or what is Teslar? Do you not know anything about the great and famous Nikola Tesla?

    • @bobsmith3983
      @bobsmith3983 10 дней назад

      You know who he is referring to so stop the BS.

    • @zoransarin5411
      @zoransarin5411 8 дней назад

      @@bobsmith3983 It isn't BS toto try and educate the commenter. Clearly if you can't spell Tesla you are unlikely to know the origon of the name, so I informed him.

  • @4Fixerdave
    @4Fixerdave 19 дней назад

    Well, I guess those Australian solar panel makers are finished now. The Chinese will just dump that much more.

  • @AtomicHermit
    @AtomicHermit 20 дней назад +2

    What the hardpressed US consumers do not comprehend is that these new tariffs are massively inflationary as they will be paid entirely by US consumers - at the same time as interest rates climb to supposedly curb inflation.
    Meanwhile, the People's Republic of China's exports to the United States make up only around 3% of its annual GDP, while China's imports make up around 7% of US GDP and account for about 5% of US jobs. For years, US industry leaders have dreamed of being able to export to the ever growing number of Chinese middlel-class consumers, who already outnumber the entire US population, and have already baked these exports into their projections and market-prices. These hopes and dreams are now conclusively ended. The Biden administration has effectively sent the US economy into an endless abyss by applying sweeping tariffs three to four times worse than those they criticized when they were imposed by Trump. What is much worse is that many of these tariffs, which China will not pay, are on intermediate products needed by American manufacturers and service providers. Steel, aluminum, seemiconsuctors, solar cells and so on. This guarantees that US producers will be at a growing disadvantage from which they will never recover.
    As an own goal, I cannot think of a larger in recent history.

  • @Fred-hi8tt
    @Fred-hi8tt 20 дней назад +10

    Tarrifs are a sneaky way of implementing a consumption tax, so government can tax you when you spend your income as well as when you earn it. Property tax, sales tax, and others take the rest of your money.

    • @verypleasantguy
      @verypleasantguy 20 дней назад +1

      Do not ever forget ---- The name of the game is *_"Fleecing the people"_*

    • @riccccccardo
      @riccccccardo 16 дней назад

      👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾

  • @morrismak
    @morrismak 19 дней назад +4

    Americans will get jealous of countries that can purchase high quality low cost Chinese products.

  • @ronblack7870
    @ronblack7870 19 дней назад +1

    chinese companies are opening manufacturing plants in mexico big time. no tariffs from mexico

  • @lb5444
    @lb5444 19 дней назад

    Raise tariffs to keep from competing?? It's not like they didn't/don't have time to change over. They just don't want to!

  • @HTeo-og1lg
    @HTeo-og1lg 20 дней назад +24

    I taught Economics at university level before. For decades, the theory of international trade in economics is premised on the notion of "comparative advantage in different countries due to the diversity of natural resources and socio-economic culture of different nations. But now, this theory is being discarded by the US because the US is no longer able to compete based on this economic principle. It is akin to kicking away the ladder that one climbed on to scale the national economic development, in order to stymie one's competitors from climbing up the ladder which one had used before. So, it is sheer hypocrisy. Shameful!

    • @hwirtwirt4500
      @hwirtwirt4500 19 дней назад +3

      China Bot.

    • @ChrisBarnes199
      @ChrisBarnes199 19 дней назад +2

      I disagree. This is targeted at national security type items. China can still send cheap textiles and consumer goods.
      The pandemic showed the US too dependent for some critical items.
      Did you notice the needle and syringe tariffs?

    • @havencat9337
      @havencat9337 19 дней назад +1

      well said...i also feel the same hypocrisy and desperation

    • @saleh45251
      @saleh45251 19 дней назад +1

      its called mercantilism! although i believe West's approach is way too late where China dominates supply chains of various industries and minerals on an unmatched level..

    • @HTeo-og1lg
      @HTeo-og1lg 18 дней назад

      @@saleh45251 . It is not. Better to refrain from using words which meaning is just emotive, or at best, nebulous.

  • @pip4so
    @pip4so 20 дней назад +3

    We in europe, can't wait for cheaper batteries that are coming over here as the factories will need to meet targets, thanks Biden!

    • @tooltalk
      @tooltalk 19 дней назад +1

      Most batteries in Europe come from Poland (LG) and Hungary (Samsung).

    • @sleefy2343
      @sleefy2343 19 дней назад

      @@tooltalkisn’t that Korean and Japanese company?

    • @tooltalk
      @tooltalk 18 дней назад

      @@sleefy2343 : yeppie, they are all South Korean.

    • @bobsmith3983
      @bobsmith3983 10 дней назад

      China is BYD is building a battery plant in Hungary so Europe will still be using batteries from a Chinese company, just made in Hungary.

    • @tooltalk
      @tooltalk 10 дней назад

      ​@@bobsmith3983 No worries, my comrade friend with fake western namehandle. By the time BYD completes their first 1.7GWh battery plant in Hungary, all of LG's 117+GWh Poland production line would be online, and Samsung's 3rd factory would be up, in addition to the existing 110GWh under expansion.

  • @scottstormcarter9603
    @scottstormcarter9603 19 дней назад

    Sounds like everyone loses on that one. Both sides doing the same thing. Wow!

  • @jasondong9721
    @jasondong9721 4 дня назад

    Americans are rich they can afford to pay more!