Incredible Fastest Wooden House Construction Method - Amazing Intelligent Log House Building Process
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 12 сен 2024
- - Amazing Intelligent Log House Building Process
- Incredible Fastest Wooden House Construction Method
Cre:
1. Brikawood International
Web: www.brikawood-ecologie.fr
2. Cada Casa - GreMagor
Web: www.cadacasa.eu/en/
www.gmd-holzrahmenbau.de
Subscribe my channel to watch the newest videos.
Subscribe now: goo.gl/8TGBfC
Thanks you!
Я в детстве такие же строил - из табуреток, одеял, подушек... Даже спал в них.)))
Мы такие домики в детстве из деревянных ящиков делали. Аж прослезился...
Халабуда, в моем детстве это называлось ))))
Это же надо придумать такую ерунду, максимально усложненная технология, как будто целых досок нет для каркаса, надо их разрезать, отфрезеровать на ЧПУ., а затем с помощью замысловатых соединений сделать из них снова целые доски. Зачем я это смотрю!
@@СергейМидин-ю9ч Так и хочется спросить - им там не дует?))))
@@СергейМидин-ю9ч это чтоб повыделываться.
How does it stand up to earthquakes, extreme wind, and snow-loads? Does it meet all standard building codes? How many such structures have been built, for how long, and how have they stood the test of time and the elements? Where are they, and can people tour them?
It doesn't. No. Probably not many, not long, and not well. You probably wouldn't want one, or tour one.
Not only that but with how many pieces of those with different cuts and shapes they probably cost more money, time, and Materials overall not really cost-effective
They are made from scrap/end cuts from another process. They are fine structurally. Very close tolerance,precision cuts and jigged.The pegs hold them in a perfect position. The inner and outer layers of roofing and siding along with interior wall is what holds them together. If you can envision a typical home ( Conventional Framing here in the west) without the interior or exterior wall , it is pretty flimsy .This is structurally engineered.
Thats built better then a 2by4 framed house because the wood locks together like wooden legos which has more give because it can move a little unlike nails and wood
@@joecrowe7062 I agree So true
I would like to see the finishing of the house , Insulation,Electrical ECT.
and plumbing
Me too.
Especially the insulation, for me.
and i would like to see what happen in a big storm :-)
Well like most Euro things ....can’t finish 😂
Невероятно быстрый способ строить красивый сарай. Последние годы, любое строение со стенами, окнами и дверью стали называть домом.
..по цене кирпичного дома..
Зачем изобретать- глина+солома+крыша из дёрна, затем лапти, копья и жизнь на дереве!
Да, и мне сразу же вспомнился Нуф-Нуф...
Ещё добавить название дома: "БарнХаус" ))))
Ну вобщем не удивительно, что при первом приличном ветре всё зто будет лежать кучей строймусора. Хорошо если хозяин успел хастраховать свое жилище.
50+ years of american carpentry , the most awesome thing I have EVER seen👍
"Не хлопать дверью!" (цитата из руководства по эксплуатации дома)
"Don't slam the door!" (quoted from the home manual)
и не чихать тоже
Вспомнилась почему-то сказка "Три поросенка".К чему бы это интересно?🤔
@@MrOlegab я тоже так хотел написать - " А если я чихну?")))
Дуть будет из всех щелей.
Зря Вы так, я встречался на практике с такой конструкцией, довольно прочная и теплая, сказать проще система веник, когда собрано, хрен сломаешь, всё очень жестко
прикольно! дом с табуреток... теперь я видел всё
Столько лишней работы , Американская технология намного проще и практичней, дома во всех погодных условиях стоят столетиями.
When IKEA and Lego merge to enter the housing industry... 😱
they would take the housing industry by storm
I wonder how many workers stepped on a wayward piece.
Строители напоминают сказку про трех поросят. Ну прям точно
The genius here, is the use of snazzy music to edit out the sound of all of the frustration cussing.
D.C. McCoy , LOL!
Hey Mario ! Have you got piece A428B1 ??!........ No but Hans asked me the same question an hour ago ! ....Where is he ?! .......Bedroom 3 !.......Holy mother of God !!!! .......Hope he forgot to glue like he usually does ???!!
Yes, after caulking 8 million cracks they had a caulk house
Especially with all those &#+*/) dowel pegs.
How do they get the last row on top on ?
То есть этот каркас даже не проклеен ничем?)) Супер! А ещё можно дом прямо из спичек построить)).
“When IKEA makes whole house flat packs 😂” can you imagine trying to decipher the plans 😂
Make sure to connect the Skoga to the slot on the Rynza and add the Schmurgitloften...
Building your home homeless style! 🤣
Stacked crates! Possibly the worst most overly unnecessary building style everyone will have to try when the economy dies due to the fake pandemic.
I was thinking about that too. After two or three it would become easy. After 20 or 30... none of your people would remember how to pound a nail. Framed a hundred house's. I like the system.
A house little kids can build without getting an ouchie.
HA! Whole house flat packs! Imagine loading that sucker into your hatchback Kia!
Plans would probably still be easier to understand than your average prefab wall layouts we are given down here in Aus. Print on-top of print on-top of print. Giant piece of A3 paper with the actual plan itself only the size of my palm and the rest of the page filled with useless information 😂
The most in depth kids playhouse builds I've ever seen, lol.
Хороший дом, супер! Надо только обшить ОСБ с обоих сторон и залить внутрь бетон, а потом утеплить снаружи 100 мм экструдполистерол, и облицовку сделать.
А, вообще, интересные технологии - вот бы сарайку на даче так построить!
Да у нас как-то всё-таки принято даже сарайки на дачу, даже из "вторичной" древесины гораздо понадёжнее строить. Тут конструкции уровня детей, играющих в Лего. Я во времена начальной школы то шалаш на даче себе гораздо основательнее делал.
На видосе местами даже на лицах работяг читается негодование, что за фигнёй они страдают и точно ли за это ктто-то будет платить))
Мы так и делали 40 лет назад. Ничего не было.
45 years a carpenter , that is literally the dumbest thing I've seen .
It uses four times as much timber as conventional construction and will blow away in the first strong wind because it lacks positive attachment between the foundation and the roof.
Scot Newcomb No, saying “literally” for no reason is the dumbest thing.
@@kdvincent1982 No, telling Scot Newcomb he used "literally" for no reason is the dumbest thing.
@@allangibson8494 The second system was not build completely: there is no exterior sheathing. How can you state anything about hurricane protection when we did not see anything but the skeleton?
Scot Newcomb sounds like a literate person to me.
Ok, I could see the argument for this type of construction if say, all you had were short pieces of wood....Like reclaimed pallet wood for example.....Then you could make the pre-fab boxes out of pallet wood and peg them together...(Even then I'd probably use wood glue or nails for that)...BUT, does it make any sense to take a perfectly good 8 to 10 foot long 2X4 and cut it up, only to have to reassemble it? All those cut pieces when they could have just left them intact....Again conventional framing beats this hands down...And from a strength perspective, which would you rather have? An intact solid piece of wood, or to have it cut up and pegged together in smaller pieces? Cutting it up into these small pieces to make your prefabricated boxes is alot of wasted work/man hours/ costs, ending in a weaker structure than conventional framing...
It would make sense if this was from waste or scrap wood.....Doesn't make sense cutting up perfectly good 2X4s though...
Even if all you had was short pieces of wood, just make laminated boards. Unless you also don't have glue. Apparently these methods are intended for places in the world where they don't have nails or glue.
Dear Cydonia: I am in the building industry and I have contacts with a lot of people who have creative ideas for how to build structures cheaper. You won’t believe how many times I’ve seen ideas like this talked about in glowing terms, the perfect vaporware. I have been asked to get involved with these projects over and over again, and only once I did it. In that particular case it took about 10 times the labor and five times the materials as could have been done better conventionally.
The case of the project I am talking about it was a bathhouse 12‘ x 16‘, using something like cement and Styrofoam particles, and it was comical. The structures would have collapsed had I not been there, and possibly killed people. I believe I was the only one on site it was not a pot smoker, and I am not kidding. The structure remains unfinished to this day, some five years later, no roof yet, the owner wants to put a concrete roof on top of an Already tipsy structure, it is so funny. The foundation is wood and everything above it is cement, it is completely ass backwards. I refuse to lend my concrete mixer to the owner, telling him point-blank that I will not be even remotely responsible for the death of his communal friends.
Just a little editorial comment: marijuana is responsible for so many ideas, almost every single one of them ate terribly bad horrible idea.
@@steveperreira5850 Far out man.
imagine a world where there are not enough construction timber forests being planted, hardwood is impossible to find/illegal.
imagine a world where construction labour is so stretched that you cannot build in a sensible timeframe
imagine a world where builders are so dishonest that it makes sense to self build, save the lawsuits
imagine a world where structures were build to local conditions, not local traditions
imagine a world where the only thing a self builder cannot do themselves is the frame, hence this video.
this world is only 5 years away.
@@steveperreira5850 I don't think that's the case my friend.
How was the sill plate attached to the slab in the second building? Also, the shearing forces on those vertical pegs seems sketchy if there's an earthquake or high winds. Especially is the house has been sitting for 50 years.
Hint: in the first world this is a cabin. Everywhere else it is a house.
Это дома на одну неделю жизни! Коробка от холодильника крепче будет!
Чтобы невероятно быстро построить, нужно невероятно долго готовиться😁
Посудомойка тоже долго моет посуду. И стиральная машина долго стирает.
2nd house looks like a scrap wood challenge!
Тут есть один большой плюс. Если каким нибудь ураганом его разнесет по округе, то элементы можно будет собрать и сляпать по новой. Главное, чертёж не потерять.
😜
Утром просыпаешься, а у тебя сосед в гостиной запарковался. Перепутал по пьяни с гаражом.
Это не дом, а времянка в которой рабочие будут жить и строить нормальный Дом!)
Поставил дизлайк, т.к. на просторах СНГ нет ничего подобного, при этом по количеству лайков видно, что народ в массе по прежнему "надрачивает" на бревно/брус, совершенно не понимая всех их недостатков. Усушка, осадка годами, как правило, плохая подгонка соединений, плохая конопатка, низкое сопротивление теплопередаче, высокая материалоемкость, невозможность жить в доме через короткое время после строительства сруба ии пр. и пр. - вот , что такое традиционные деревянные стены.
Цена будет золотая
Unless you are wanting to fill the walls with gravel or something for security, I don't see any advantage to this type of construction. Just have the truss manufacturer prebuild 2x4 or 2x6 walls and trusses. That would use a lot less material and the framing would take less time and you would have more interior space.
if space is your concern this isnt even on the list ofoptions
I thought the same thing lots of material and how much time goes into each piece? My guess is time, labor and materials are probably the same as traditional probably more materials
Might be a good construction solution in case you have loads of smaller wood pieces, instead of large logs and bars.
При съемке данного ролика ни одно бревно не пострадало...
Я удивлён, - почему не из дранки? :)))
@@user-tg6yo7io2y +1000000000
При стройке обычным брусом потребуется столько же времени и для показанного метода не учитывается время, потраченное на изготовление всех этих деталей.
Для обычного бруса нужен качественный материал и специалисты
А тут любой может собрать, и детали делаются на автоматической линии из отходов с погрешностью до миллиметра
@@paganini9643 Согласен. Все методы строительства имеют право жить.
на ютубе до обеда копают колодец,,,
@@paganini9643 А что будет, если деревянные "пальцы" срежет? В этот каркас как утеплитель просунуть? Все это должно осуществляться в процессе. Если общить снаружи щитами или досками, то все-равно Российскую, даже Белорусскую зиму эта этажерка может не перенести. Перекорежит все, перекрутит.
@@paganini9643 то-то на 4х рабочих 2 прораба, и стоимость отходов дороже расшитой доски в размер проекта дома на соседнем заводе в разы. Это развод, как дрова продать по дороже.
Спасибо за выпуск. Интересная технология.
The first system was pretty neat. The 2nd system I would never use. There is a reason why stick frame houses are built they way they are and that is because it is the fastest, most cost effective way we have currently. A good framing crew could get those walls up in less time, and there is no pre-engineered system. Set of prints, stack of 2x4s, and a nail gun and you have a frame.
"I dare you to make a house out of cardboard and wood, but you can't use any nails or metal whatsoever."
"Hold my legos"
I just have this memory of my head of those Legos all fitting together snug and tight. Then you have those few Legos that are just stretched out and won't stay on. Then I think about that second house and think tornado! Hope all those blocks are snug or it's going to be like taking a shop vac to Legoland.
Я представляю какие скрипы будут со временем !
Well, I'm still in favor of gluing and screwing but I was impressed by the shadow of the camera drone flying by.
In the second method, how do you prevent a fire in the walls from running the entire structure? No fire stops at all!
Was the house even attached to the cement foundation? A house built out of 1 x 4s does not instil a secure feeling. At all.
not to mention no insulation, no vapour barrier. This is a cabin. nothing else.
I'm waiting for the scene when the wolf comes by and huffs and puffs and blows it all down
Is there a foundation?
i dont know about these houses theres just something wrong... like the first one is goind to suck all the water from the ground like whaat?
I think you mean 'concrete' , Cement is a powder !
Непонятно зачем и для чего?
Большая трудоёмкость по изготовлению блоков для сборки.
Чем обшивается?
Это все так и останется, дизайнер такой попался.
Это выставочный образец, обшивка не требуется! Наслаждайтесь самой гениальностью конструкции, обшивка только помешает.
@@user-rf1ct8we2s Это гениально ??!
Не удивлен, что волк сдул пару домишек поросеночков в сказке!
2nd system ; what a labour intensive, material wasting, space wasteing, over engineered waste of time . The hours and cost of preparing the system before it goes on site is ridiculous.
Both systems are horribly wasteful of machining time and as shown would not pass our UK Building Regs especially for damp penetration, thermal performance but most importantly, FIRE. A fire in the cavity would propagate within the cavity without the occupants knowing until the whole external wall was alight!
The timber does not look as though it is impregnated with rot proof chemicals. The timber should be impregnated after machining to ensure adequate protection and there is a huge number of parts. I would like to see the state of one of these buildings built on a typical UK house building site in the pissing rain. The timber would be prone to absorbing massive amounts of moisture, which would ultimately have serious effects on the internal finishes. All I can say is KISS (keep it simple stupid), 'cos this ain't.
@@clivewilliams1406 Both systems where build for US. The first one is questionable but could be used for a summer house in some southern/central dry state in US. The second one: your arguments are pointless: because we do not see any exterior cladding , water impermeabilisation, shear walls, etc. installed. Actually, there is nothing except the skeleton and the layer between foundation slab and the walls. Put insulation, proper exterior water protection like fluid applied membrane or Zip or anything and it could become a "net zero" home.
If these systems exist , they do not exist in the void. They do respect regulations and building codes of some country
@@libertyspeak1883 ICF??? lesser cost and faster build times? ICF is great for many places and many reasons but it is not simple, cheap or fast to build with.
@@sashkashurik When it's all said and done sensible people, who care about their hard earned money, almost always choose a more conventional, tried, true, serviceable, storm rated system. The market for this system is tiny and the designer and his financiers are having themselves on. I sort of had this "fuzzy" feeling as i watched, of that old school wood and chipboard framed, aluminium clad caravan/trailer as we tried to repair the rotted wood and water disolved chip board hidden under that pristine metal sheeting, sealed at the corners by an aluminium strip, stuck on by some sort of petrified snot produced from a plastic tube. It was great while it lasted.
@@pistolpeds over enginereed?..no for mass production!!!!
I have a few serious questions hopefully they get answered.
1. How is it secured to the foundation?
2. How is this a more efficient way of building?
3. Is there ANY nails in this design?
4. Do the dowels have a high sheer strength?
через 15 лет надо будет делать капитальный ремонт или новый дом на этом месте
@@TheYerjan1978 You are right. Maybe even in less time.
Hey, I have an idea!! What if (and this is so great I can hardly hold back) instead of the music somebody (I'm sure somebody could be found) might tell us something about what is going on, along with the video? That would be amazing.
Looks like a bunch of dudes framing houses using pre-fabricated blocks and no metal fasteners. This is the step they do before adding pipes and wires inside, which they don't show in the video, which is the same with wrapping the structure with plastic and adding siding to the outside. They only show the framing part in the video.
@@phil562 Not even houses; just framing. Still need plumbing, electrical, insulation, siding, and on and on and on.
Most of the house was constructed in the factory. The video title should be... "Putting the rest of a house together."
What house?It is just an expensive cage.
@@gustavobaires2849 LOL! Very expensive.
This is awesome! Just add some growing medium between the walls and it would be perfect for mushroom cultivation.
I didn’t see them actually secure the base plate to the slab, what happens in an earthquake or major wind storm?
They used double face tape.
They didn't show the last step of staking the whole thing down like a giant tent.
This is Badass!!! So cool, like a cross between legos and bricks!! Truly an innovation! So AWESOME!! WOW!
For sure the result of an architect who really really liked legos growing up.
and a HUGE fan of IKEA.
А я то гадал...куда девались все посылочные ящики, которые нас в школе заставлял трудовик делать. А оно вон что...он из них дачу по ходу строил. Сенсация!!! Даешь технологию "из говна и палок" в массы!!
И да...где хоть одно бревно из названия и описания?
@@user-uo1qh9nd9d палок не хватило. Зато г*** много.
Первая мысль была такая: переводят древесину на говно! А вторая - переводят древесину на говно...
Это из отходов.
@@user-ty8ub3od6j даже такие отходы более разумно применить можно
Ну как в России ,из говна и палок. Только буржуи лес свой берегут,а мы нормальные доски,бревна на бумагу пускаем,а из опилок мебель и дома строим.
!))%
100%
This is a “DEMO” construction on a parking lot folks. Notice there are no plumbing pipes... sewer connections... electrical ... HVAC ... stairs... garage...doors... or closets... IT is a proof of concept. So calm down. You want the walls to take up less interior space... move the exterior walls out farther! Six men stacking a house in less than 24 hours using pegs and blocks works for me... if my wife and I could stack it in two weeks I would be pleased. A lot easier than trying to build a log cabin out of 800 pound logs. I see the potential for pipes, ducts, and electrical in those wall spaces AND a lot of insulation. Some time in the future I would gladly put 30 minutes into watching a tape of this house being “ permanently “ constructed in the real world... all your “CODE” requirements of anchors, bracing, and storm survival will be addressed .... I promise. We have been building houses the same way for fifty years... I like the innovation that computer design and laser accuracy in component manufacture has brought to the table. I have watched thousands of houses being built from conventional materials... the shame is that truckloads of scrap and cut-off gets hauled to the dump and wasted! This job had no trash! AND I will bet that at the factory where these modules were assembled they have scaled the components to completely consume the 2x4’s that they are cutting from... if there are ANY tiny scraps left I will bet they turn them into those thousands of pegs that they use to connect modules! All they have left is SAWDUST that they probably burn for heat! I would build a house out of LEGOS if plastic wasn’t so expensive! More power to engineers who come up with clever building modules that can be be adapted to multiple surroundings and locations... small portable components are key to off grid locations... you might have to make a thousand trips back and forth to carry it all in, but man has been doing that for thousands of years... rocks, sticks, mud bricks, logs, sod, peat, etc.
This house did not require the dozens of tools that I find myself tripping over on jobs. I saw rubber mallets, a sawzall, some ladders, some C-clamps, a laser, a nail bag for pegs. I usually have two truck loads of every tool I own ( if I leave ONE damn tool behind, that will be the first tool I need and the job goes to hell right there!) I have seen videos of houses made from bags of dirt, bottles, laminated cardboard, styrofoam, bamboo, cow dung ( no joke... in Africa!) glass blocks ,tires packed with dirt, dug into cliffs, chiseled into rock ... I love them all.
@ Randal Ramsey ; If this is a demo construction I think this system has failed. 6 men to frame up a glorified shed in 3 working days (24 hrs). If i buy land in a modern subdivision at 600m2 or less with a council ordinance house front designated a compulsory 6m from the front block boundry and 2.6m each side for side boundaries this system would reduce my internal house space by ? It hasn't been bricked over yet. A house 4 rooms wide would take over 2m of my internal, livable space.
Its not as good as apex block or you know regular building styles.
Someone had a vision, Not necessarily a good vision but they had one. Take consolidation in the core premise of the human condition is that we learn through our failures.
So ah have you ever worked in a no waste pre fab facility cause i have....for a long ass time. There is always plenty of waste so get off your hi horse and try to remember this is the internet
Tim McGlone the Internet never fails to deliver at least one jackass response to any thought...eh? High horse enough for ya bloke?
Das sieht gut aus
Moral of the story, the big bad wolf would have fun with this building.
I'm not really seeing a whole lot of economy or efficiency. Did I miss something?
yes, it has Amazing Intelligent Incredible Fastest in the tile so it must be :)
Yes, it was fast and required a mere rubber mallet to put up, and of course the snazzy jump suits.
Only if you sell 16 inch boards or recycle crates. I saw nothing fast about either of those. That was a LOT of labor time, not factoring in pre-assembly. .
You missed nothing, this is the kind of thing that gets city Slickers all excited, but doesn’t fool Anyone that can swing a hammer.
you missed the efficiency of shipping 'framed blocks of air' from the factory to the site in 10 times the volume of the raw materials
Yeh, But how many weeks did it take to machine and cut everything.
Doesn't matter. The first is all CNC'ed and cut to size product. It's quite likely a heavily automated process. The second is also clearly mostly CNC parts that are then assembled in factory.
And then a kit that anyone who understands LEGO appears at a DIY homeowner's doorstep that they can assemble without the waste. Higher material cost, but if you do this by yourself? A lot of your contractor fees can be avoided.
Key word, “machines”
Automation with the win.
CNC, days not weeks
5 days.
@@drackar yeah it's all good till the kool-aid man shows up and levels the entire fuckin thing with one "OH YEAHHHH"
Дом из табуретов 😆 у трудовиков наверное не один дом из них построен)))
за 17 минут весь каркас собрали молодцы))
I can see that working as long as you're not in a earthquake prone or tornado prone area. 🤠
Actually, with it being interlocked as it is, it would be rather earthquake resistant since it would flex more than traditional sickbuilds. As it is, no home is tornado resistant...unless it's a concrete dome with reinforced steel shutters to protect the windows.
Three of my friends built a wooden house, It got blown down by this really huge wolf type bloke.
OINK
serves them right , i heard they lived like pigs !
предстовляю стоимость, за такие деньги можно построить из газобетона шикарный дом
Это у нас дерево так дорого стоит ,потому что леса горят ,дерево дифицит китайцы вывезли всё
@@user-is6mk5sq6k У них нормальное дерево стоит еще дороже, чем у нас. Вы разве не заметили, что домики из мусора и отходов деревообрабатывающих предприятий?
system 2 client: " We changed our mind... we would like this door to be a pocket door"
system 2 builder: "sorry, lady....that ain't gonna happen...."
As a carpenter myself I have to say it looks highly over engineered but looks like a quick system once the crew figures out the tricks to assembling them and staging them for building them
I imagine that anything made in a factory is 1/10th of the labour cost of doing it in the field
@@markroberts171 I would disagree with that statement. The second one looks like a slow build and not very strong. While they were putting the ceiling joist in the walls were still shacking. A house that small could be framed in a single day by conventional methods.
@Mark Roberts I agree.There is very few unique components .Unlike that of an automobile for example .
@@bigjohn524 They are made from scrap/end cuts from another process. They are fine structurally. Very close tolerance,precision cuts and jigged.The pegs hold them in a perfect position. The inner and outer layers of roofing and siding along with interior wall is what holds them together. If you can envision a typical home ( Conventional Framing here in the west) without the interior or exterior wall , it is pretty flimsy .This is structurally engineered.
My 4 man framing crew would be under paper, window and doors installed, everything sheeted and weather proof ready for mechanicals
Как приятно смотреть на мастеров и их слаженной работой.
Да и если сделать бригаду не 5 , а 15 человек то можно снять ролик как построить дом до обеда
this looks like a weak structure and at the amount of prep for the blocks the cost has to be very high.. I think it’s stupid.
i agree.
Must remove the “intelligent” from the title.
Doesn’t look weak to me, perhaps you have trouble with new techniques? Personally I wouldn’t pay for such a kit but it’s interesting no?
Weak? Haha dovetail house weak? You obviously have no engineering knowledge
@@johnhenson8244 where are you seeing dovetailing anywhere in this pathetic structure?
Интересно, строителям удалось сбежать прежде, чем дом был разрушен или нет?
Interesting, sure. But it's easy to call something super fast when you don't have to consider the time and energy that goes into making all the prefab pieces. ICF has the same problem.
Это не все строительство, это заключительный этап сборки готовой конструкции. Причем, судя по всему, подготовительный этап намного сложнее и дольше сборки.
This looks like a nightmare come true.
building for 35 years.
Just because you been doing something for 35 years doesn't mean it's the best way. I'm pretty sure if it wasn't safe or didn't meet requirements it would not have been permitted . Have you seen any new contuction methods lately ? From SIP panel , to Prefaps (I'm'm not talking about trailer homes)
@@treffle17 the fact that you said prefap instead of prefab shows that you haven't got a clue. Said from the sitting room of my 120yr old brick house in the UK
@@treffle17 Yeah. Modular homes built in a factory and assembled on-site. Heavel blocks. Pod concrete. Tilt up concrete houses.
Давно так не ржал ))) До слез ....
I would like to test this in a wind tunnel , and see how it holds up. In fact I feel all housing should be certified by hundred mile per hour winds.
threaded rod is your friend. tie the top to the bottom.
Yes stonehouses
No adhesive. These won't last long.
Fantastic. Great engineered structure. I would love to own one.
@Democrats Suck how so?
@Democrats Suck none. I'm just a viewer and thought it made sense .the materials are all wood. Can't see why it wouldn't be a stable structure.
@@videopokernetwork6824 Unless they go back and nail all the pieces its not any more stable than a jenga block tower.
собрали дом за один день )) а детали для него пол года точили )))
The shell of the house is the easy part. It's the electrical, mechanical, plumbing, and fixtures that take all the time and money.
In the first house I thought that if the humidity drops you will be able to see through the cracks on the ends of those blocks. no neoprene sealant was used anywhere.
Because laying flat pieces of wood onto a moisture barrier on flat concrete is really going to stop the timber rotting. With all the work making the block structures and transporting mostly air to the building site and having to peg in all the dowels and hammering down each piece which has zero insulation properties, this is the most stupid prefab I have ever seen.
Ein Felder I was thinking the same thing, I could have stood the whole building in insulated panels complete with the bracing element and insulation and been weather tight in the same or less time
The words that kept repeating in my head were “timber box”.
designed by some idiot on a computer who never studied frame building and never set foot on a construction site. most stupid prefab and an insult to the viewer
смотря на второй дом, почему то все время думал, что от ветра его сдует)
Super système !!! Un jeu d'enfants !! Mais est ce aux normes actuelles RE 2020 ??? J'espère que l'on peut l'avoir en France ! Encore bravo.
Я не назвал бы это невероятно быстрой стройкой. Это обычный монтаж из готовых деталей. Думаю, их изготовление заняло в три-пять раз больше человеко-часов, чем монтаж.
А результат просто удручает.
Interesting ... would have liked to see more details on the first build, electrical install, interior work, insulation etc. On the second, interesting concept, definitely think it would be lower noise on the work site for the most part but I've some issues as I'm not a construction expert. For both, would they be within code? On the second would the structure be tied into the concrete pad, from first look the answer is no, and in areas of high winds that can be a problem, how would that be addressed? Also, though it may be hidden by the ground cloth, no provisions for plumbing observed, so ... hmmm. Also on the second, as for the first, in particular insulation install, what would be used? When were these built, are there similar ones built earlier? What do they look like structurally 5, 10, 20 years after being built? I like the looks of the second one's frame and that they put at least some plywood up on the attic level.
In some countries, the design is for surface mounted electrical and plumbing instead of putting it in the walls. In fact, in some countries, when you buy a new house, it doesn't even come with the cabinets, electrical, and plumbing -- you add it after you buy it. Then again, some countries use squat toilets also... Not my style, but I've seen some different things in my travels over the years...
I highly doubt this construction method would meet any of the seismic codes in California.
everything about the second build screams temporary construction to me.... something meant to be put up for a while in one location, then taken down and moved to another location.. there is no way in hell that thing would meet building codes in any first world country.
Это не СТРОИТЕЛЬСТВО, а сборка конструктора. Не путайте полет мысли и клишированные фразы.
Boss: Ok kid start cutting 16" blocks.
Labourer: How many do we need?
Boss: All of them.....all the blocks that have ever been cut.
Ну хоть не зря посмотрела...комментарии,повеселилась от души:)
Благодарю вас за классный ролик!!!✊✊👍👍
honestly, i'm surprised it didnt tip over when they leaned their ladders against it.
хотел поржать над первым домом, но потом начали строить второй из табуреток - он меня покорил :))))) это же мечта! агар....))))))))))))
из опилок от этих двух домов можно еще третий построить опилкобетонный )
Let's be honest, we assembled the house in a day, and spent a month preparing parts in the shop!
machining all the timber parts must have cost an absolute fortune , without the fact that it looks about as rigid as a house of cards , and will burn for a month if caught fire . apart from that its great
Incroyable mais vrai 🙀🙀🙀🙀🙀💯💯💯💯 Bravo les Artiste .
Есть сказка про трёх поросят. Там доступно описанно качай дом лучше😁😁😁
Только хотел написать
Somewhere in heaven, the Haun brothers are getting a chuckle out of this.
@Kyle Usher Larry and Joe Haun.
@Kyle Usher Look up, "Lary Haun carpenter" and you will get a bunch of older videos showing he and his brother building houses. If memory serves me correctly Larry and Joe could rough out a house in two days.
óoooóóooooooooooooooooooooooooooooóooooóóooooooooóooooooóóooóóoooóóóóooooooóóóoooópóooooooóoooooooooooooooooooooóooóoooooooooooooooooooóoooooooooooooooooooooóoóoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooóóoóoooooooooooooooooóoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooóóóoóoóóoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooóóooooooooóooooooooooooooooooóoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
@@TerryPullen hehe, lots of people have been pointing fingers at Elon Mask's rockets, now it is reality. Larry and Joe were good at their times, and yes they could build a frame in couple days, because they were professionals. Can you do it? I bet no. And this tech (gremagor) seems to be so easy to assemble, that an ordinary person could do it in half of a day. Just imagine if you could buy such blocks in a shop...
Would have been nice to see what the house looked like when finished
Если прибавить очень сложную и затратную подготовку к строительству, получится не очень быстро и достаточно сложно. Есть плюс, для строительства можно использовать не сортовой лес либо его обрезки. Минус должна быть развитая база для изготовления сегментов.
Да и не только о времени речь, и о цене, там заготовки обработаны с таким качеством, что цена будет выше классического строительства, не говоря уже о бригаде из 5 человек
Don't forget the wellbeing of your workers ,, take care of them and give them a safe environment to work in ,,, I could just imagine all of them having bad back pains after all that stretching , poor guys ,, hope you had plenty of beer on hand to numb out their pains , you want them to come back , right???
What is the wind volume and weight capacity on the roof of this house.
And can this be built at any location.
This may be, may just be, the stupidest building theory I have ever seen.
well they can hire anyone...takes about 6 minutes training
I agree. It is so labor intensive vs 2 x 4 with 4 x 8 sheets. Machine time and pre-assemble work would need to be fully automated. It's like lumber mills want a way to sell short boards (1st one) and the 2nd is an attempt to recycled crates and pallets. I'm all for finding uses for scrap and recycling, but I would pass on both of these. The 1st seems like a hobby hut or playhouse (kinda using life size linking logs). The 2nd, i guess could replace some cheaper metal buildings like a garage or utility building, but I would not want to be in it in strong winds.
@@imushavem7504 first one is interesting but not practical I like the overall look but I imagine the cost is astronomical compared to just building normally.
it's not construction, it's assembly. it takes no more ability than building with lego, but it's the future we're gonna get because it keeps them employed without needing the skill of even a basic carpenter. the only tools they used were a ladder, rubber mallet and screw clamps. all the skill was moved to the machines in the factory.
Certainly wouldn't pass the Regulations!
I have to ask, "where is the tie-down and the wind loadings?"
@@parry4now like, u load some wind into the house
Maynard wind loadings are places on the structure that absorb the big gusts of wind that threaten the structure and transfer the energy to the foundation as to not damage or rather pull apart the structure.
Not going to get approved in California: no earthquake tie downs.
Укрепить картонную коробку синей изолентой займет один час с тремя перекурами. На выходе будет тоже самое. Только без щепок.
I am most perplexed by the motivation for such displays of impractical methods. You will not see this process again unless you watch this video a second time. Wow looking at this makes me think of the hours and hours of whining motors, endless wood machinery burning up cutters just to add complexity and 800 thousand shear points. I guess if you filled it with a billion CF of closed cell it would be strong as hell however that is true of most any framing design.
The second house was a real waste, and I really wonder would it hold up in a wind storm? What did they side it with, and what was used on the interior walls? The only benefit I could see is that the wiring and plumbing would be easy. But you could build 2 houses out of the same lumber and in less time.
@ronnie doorzon I actually think the second one is quite innovative. Considering 40% of all custom house builds in North America end in litigation I would say that the more can produce in a manufacturing environment with real quality control, the better. This house is probably twice the value of North American stick frame builds.
@@johnhewetson4406 No, not twice the VALUE, twice the PRICE.!
They are not synonymous.
@@linmal2242 You may be right, they might even be three times better. Six inch studs don't insulate worth a darn.
Let’s see 2 years later, when all these individual blocks are weathered and shrunk and a thousand leaks and drafts.
I'm sure there's still an exterior sheeting product to be applied. They could easily go full-clad and use a fluid-applied exterior membrane with spray foam or something like that and skip all those problems.
The issue with the construction industry is that it moves slower than shit on the shower floor.
@@blanksender7808 lol , shit on the shower floor .
That is why Log Homes have adjustable anchoring systems
because as the house settles, the owner has to continuously
make adjustments by tightening down the huge anchor screws.
If not, then you will start having gaps form between the individual
logs...!
Then the wolf said "I'll huff and I'll puff and blow this house down". Rapid -Ok. Safe against a gale -don't know.
And do not forget the mice will be their permanent residence
Interesting avatar.
Plumbing, electrical, seismic, wind loading? Insulation? HVAC? Termites will love these houses.
*Ha! I've never before seen wooden dowels that huge!*