A bomber that's also a super-maneuverability fighter that has an armored cabin. (oh and it has a kitchen and a toilet in the back, for those long flights)
I hope the toilet is able to drop its very "ordnance" over the enemy. Imagine how cool it whould be to low pass an enemy squad and literally "bomb the shit out".
This is, perhaps, my favorite Russian fighter/bomber of all time. Loved the redesigned fuselage. I recall when it first came out the west nicknamed it the platypus/daffy duck; however, I thought it was simply beautiful; still do. Puts a smile on my face ever time I see it.
Watched this video for the first time when I was 8, back when it was uploaded. Watching it again today, about to be 20. I grew up with the good RUclips, and this video is just amazing. Hail to the king, Sukhoi!
That jet is HUGE. Somewhere between a Mig-29, and a TU-144! It looks like a whole new catagory of airplane. Very impressive. Maybe the last fighter/bomber that will be built for some time.
I read somewhere that this fighter actually has a toilet, well not your conventional toilet, but nonetheless better than having the pilots wetting their suits :)
I can't get it uout of my head that this aircraft would be an amazing private jet. Sukhoi should make a civilian version of it. Just because they can! :D
@@asiftalpur3758 fuck yourself then because you ARE Russia !! pitty man ! traitor of your motherland !! go live in uSSa where there are drugs all over for you, and crime, and bad health and food, GMO's and despair, suicides and murders, neo-liberal financial FRAUD and toilet paper $$$$$$ with NO value at all against gold !
@Talshet The sound of cracks as the building collapsed was the sound of the struts slowly deforming. Basically the shear force of the weight of one side of the building collapsed in on itself. A plane crash into the tower would of easily effected the inward skeletal structure of the building to cause it to collapse. If your gonna argue a set up it won't be from the plane hitting the towers or the events of how they collapsed; it would be that they planed the plane crash, which is just stupid
Look at the front end of an F-111. Long duck billed nose to increase forward visibility, high side by side seating to increase the camaraderie and teamwork between pilot and b/n. This aircraft can do air to air but it's primary mission is ground target destruction. Both are fast, both can carry heavy armament loads, both are designed for long range missions. They are both built in a heavy sturdy fashion to increase reliability. This is an excellent aircraft, and it does borrow from the past.
+mrwong11989 Nice to see an American counterpart not raging comments, both are great, both shall always be great, and lets hope neither come marching shouting ones better =]
lorenzoschiavetti197 Well they are still improving it. It wont be introduced to the US airforce till 2017 or 2018. What i am trying to say is that Russians have old school technology.
@Talshet wasn't the aluminium plane that 'cut' steel bars, it was the fire that melted the riveted bolts that in turn allowed the towers to collapse. Its a well known engineering fact when the question arises; Which structure is safer in a fire a wood or metal? The answer is wood, Why? Even though wood burns it takes a while before its loses its rigidity. Steel however deforms once it is heated and losses all structural rigidity at once. Causing the building to collapse.
The interesting thing about the plane is it's performance, the F-15E strike eagle can carry a heavier load but Su-34 has the longer range and better crew endurance
but I find su 34 has 12,000 kg of total payload while f 15E has a large total of 10,400 kg , I acquired this from wiki I would like to know your sources cuz that is wierd
Russia can more. In the near future Russia will demonstrate gorgeous technical masterpieces, as only Mr Putin will save the country from unworthy and insignificant Western financial system. Russia will be powerful, just, good, and people will be strong, both physically and in spirit. Russia will bring into this wicked world goodness and humanity, because in the consciousness of Russian citizens is collectivism, while the West is the Mavericks. Russia will bring good power and good. Long live Mr President and all the inhabitants of planet Earth. )
@looxgood Interesting, B/C I read that the Su-34's passive radar was there to compliment the Irbis AESA which has a targeting and engagement range of over 400 Km at normal power and can easily detect the F-22s hack-job stealth package, which far exceeds what our AESA is capable of. Oh, just as a side note: AIM-120A range: 30 Mi. R-77 range: 50 Mi. R-77M1 range: 110 Mi. Even with the improvements, it is doubtful they managed to give the AIM-120 a 300% boost to range.
@jjnomjqg : this aircraft is effectively slow (less than mach 2) because it's studied to fly near the ground so it's inherently slow (like the B-1B it lacks variable intakes). Anyway just because they're bigger, it doesn't mean that they're slower, actually not only they're faster but they're also more manoeuvrable than American fighters.
@lukitazz568 Completely different roles. The A-10 is meant to destroy heavy armor and provide general CAS. The Su-34 is a fighter/bomber. I'm sure the Su-34 is far better at doing general bombing missions, but the A-10 is far more effective at taking out enemy armor and destroying vehicle columns.
I know much more than you think. F-18 is generally not designed for maneuverability, but to fly at low altitude, high speed. F-18 and F-16 in the dog fight, when you go into a sharp turn, lose speed much faster than the F-15 and Su-27,because they make smaller radius turns at speeds below 450km / h than the above,in those turns they can not maintain the speed, and soon become the prey in the dog fight.with a full tank and full of weapons, F-16 has an extremely small ratio of weight and thrust
An advantage..the man beside you will notice if you feel sleepy. In simple, the performance of teamwork in side by side cockpit will increase. That happened in F 111 and A6 crews. (Please forgive my English..)
I learned in school :-) I didn't wrote that SU-27 does not lose speed,but to lose a lot less than other aircraft ... If you need tables with a rate of turn (do not know how to say in English) for the Su-27, F-15, F-16, I'll give it, it is easy to conclude which of these planes has the advantage. Wing / loading is extremely important ... because it provides buoyancy(climg),with less speed and greater wing surface,the plane has greater buoyancy,and consequently better maneuverability.
Could it be, that it is just another Su-27 variant. Oh yes - it is... Sukhoi makes only one plane in different flavors. And people are complaining, that Porsche has to many different variants on the same model...
Porsche has a great base to work from, a good chassis and a lot of experience with it. Maybe it is the same with the SU-27 frame... If it is good and has potential for upgrades, why throw it away ? I believe the Russians do it too with the chassis from the T72 and T80 series... I know it was a different era, but the Germans did it with their ME109 throughout the war, keeping it upgraded to keep up with the competition. Same with the Panzer IV series. There is a world of difference between the Pz IV of 1939 and the Pz IV of 1945, despite being the same beast underneath. And the chassis was also used for the Stug series, I believe. The Brits also, kept on pushing and updating the envelope of the original Spitfire...
Renaud Mayers I don't think, that it is a very bad thing... However the airframe will give some limitations, which you won't have, if you'd develop individual musters. The issue is, that the Russian military industry became somewhat lazy. There are quite a few completely new designed airframes in the west for the past two decades.... However in Russia there is basically only the PakFa... All others are just upgrades.
Dominik MJ You are right. i'd love to see more new models coming out of Russia. With the SU35, although it is derived from the Flanker frame, it has been very heavilly modified. However, let's not forget the Sukhoi SU 47 Berkut, that was build and used as a test bed for a lot of the technologies now used in the SU 35. There was also the Mig MFI /LFI 1.44... It was the first Russian attempt at a Gen 5 fighter. A couple of those technology demonstrators were built before the whole project was mothballed due to lack of funding. We forget that Russia went through a lost decade... Between 1991 with the fall of the USSR and 2000, Russia was basically a bankrupt country. the military didn't order any new or existing planes, money dried up for the different design bureau. that they survived through that period is almost a miracle in itself. What they managed to do upgrade wise with the Mig35 and the SU35 is testament to how good the original designs were. The PaK FA is a brand new design but I understand there still are some problems to iron out. It's understandable when one sees the problems the US has had and still has in developing the F22 and F35. Then, there is the Yak 130. Although it is not an advanced fighter plane, it is a very good trainer jet that can be used as a light fighter plane should the need arise.
Renaud Mayers начнем с того, что СУ- 35 нет даже намека на стелс, хотя бы как у F- 18 и кроме того появление СУ- 35 говорит лишь о том, Т- 50 ждать- не дождаться. МИг- 35 мертворожденный все заявления о его закупке ВВС России не более чем сплетни в кулуарах( однако ВМФ России закупит партию МИГ- 29К для палубной авиации- вчера в новостях). СУ- 34 очень нужная машина для бомбардировочной авиации ( СУ- 24 устарел), хоть самолет и получился перетяжеленным, тем не менее он очень нужен, жаль, что выпускают всего 1 самолет в год( но идет модернизация производства)! ЯК- 130 дозвуковой УТС, сверхзвуковой ЯК- 140 продан Китаю.
Its a CAS aircraft with extend capability. Making it have weapons bays for whatever reason is redundant, it doesnt need them for they would not serve any practical purpose. This plane is a cross between 3 types of aircraft with its primary purpose being CAS, but where as most CAS planes need air dominance already in place this one can also function as a bomber and a fighter to establish it if need be, or operate in areas where air superiority is not absolute.
I just love this plane. The thought of what has the appearance of a big fighter having a lavatory and cooking facilities inside is so ridiculous that it comes full-circle to being awesome.
R-73 is discontinued, its replacement is r-74m fully digital. A should be added to the range of r-27ET (infra red) is 130km, which is the IR missile with the greatest range.
@CartesianCat These buildings are not standing next to, between them were not damaged the building and all videos can be seen that the building in which the planes were falling vertically
The Aim-120 can pull 40g at supersonic speed. The Aim-9X is a vector thrust missile that can tell the difference between flares, chaff and an aircraft. Russia has several AA missiles that can pull over 18G. Now isn't about hitting targets from 9 miles to 140 miles out and countering attacks by very expensive gear such as stealth technology and anti-missile missiles such as a trophy system.
One Su-34 participated in the war 080808 in option support jamming systems. Despite the fact, that in this war Russia lost several aircraft, within range of this aircraft was not even highlighting by enemy air defense system. Currently in Russia there is no modern jammer like, for example, Growler. Platform Su-34 performing the functions of strike aircraft, can provide the Russian combat aviation invulnerability.
@Talshet What are you on about jet fuel melting metal? Jet fuel isn't an acid its a flammable hydrocarbon. As two large objects collide at a high velocity the ignition effect occurs. The heat deformed the metal causing the struts holding up the building to weaken and collapse. 1400°C, funny that since jet engines 2000°C+. Moving on the youngs modulus was exceeded by over 20 times in the crash. The shear modulus to buckle the building would of been its own weight.
***** oh yes,i remember when the russians were kicked by the Talibans in the 80's, they were beaten badly, something similar on how ISIS is over running the iraquí army.
@Talshet Say hello to the New F-15 Silent Eagle thats already in production. It's predecessor the F-15 Eagle is undefeated in 200+ Air combat missions. This is not a simulated combat an actually air to air battle against Mirage, Migs and Sukhois.
We also heard about "acceptable losses"(TM) - you know exactly who coined this euphemism. Somebody of us even was LCC operators of Big Red Button 30 meters under ground. Duty joke was "Will you turn the Key, bro?" Duty answer was "No shit bro. Exactly I will". It has nothing with "attacking". Its all about "Who ever take the sword will perish by the sword".
2:30-2:31 the cannisters do not come off clean and one strikes the rear fusalage, you can see the aircraft pitch nose down from impact. It happens earlier in the video w/ other ordnance. Seems to have rack ejector problems or bad air flow around the weapons stores. Beautiful aircraft though....
@BrianBuckShot Yes, toilets, kitchens, and plenty of room in the cockpit too. One pilot can make tea while the other's blowing stuff up - sounds suspiciously British ;)
the first few shots of it with people standing around it makes it look HUGE!!! and i love that camouflage paint job, it looks so sexy, why don't other western countries put on sexy paint jobs like that.
The Su-34BF looks a worthy replacement for the Su-24BN, being able to carry some 7,000 kg of A/G ordnance plus an AK-630 cannon and a mix of R-73 and R-77 AAM's for fighting one's way to and from the target when necessary---a lesson from the Second World War implemented to this day by Frontal Aviation.
A bomber that's also a super-maneuverability fighter that has an armored cabin. (oh and it has a kitchen and a toilet in the back, for those long flights)
I hope the toilet is able to drop its very "ordnance" over the enemy. Imagine how cool it whould be to low pass an enemy squad and literally "bomb the shit out".
@@adrianopadilha7338 Thats point sometimes shit is froze big ice cube...ha ha ha
@@adrianopadilha7338чувак ты классный и выше всяких похвал !!!!
Sweet. ♥️♥️👍👍
Su-34 - mighty duck
+Scintilla Gloom Actually most commonly refered to by forum crowd as "Hellduck".
This is, perhaps, my favorite Russian fighter/bomber of all time. Loved the redesigned fuselage. I recall when it first came out the west nicknamed it the platypus/daffy duck; however, I thought it was simply beautiful; still do. Puts a smile on my face ever time I see it.
In my opinion, it looks more like this: higheredgeblog.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/underwater-photo-big-pike-eso-32739506.jpg
It's glorious, reminds me of a royal swan that is turquoise
I am surprised that no body is talking about it's toilet and kitchen inside this beast.
Me too brother. 👍👍
One of the most beautiful airplanes ever created.
The most beautiful war plane on the planet !!!!
I totally agree. ♥️♥️👍👍
Watched this video for the first time when I was 8, back when it was uploaded.
Watching it again today, about to be 20.
I grew up with the good RUclips, and this video is just amazing.
Hail to the king, Sukhoi!
Queen.
That jet is HUGE. Somewhere between a Mig-29, and a TU-144! It looks like a whole new catagory of airplane. Very impressive. Maybe the last fighter/bomber that will be built for some time.
Just about finished making a model of this and yes, compared to my other ones this one is by far the biggest.
I read somewhere that this fighter actually has a toilet, well not your conventional toilet, but nonetheless better than having the pilots wetting their suits :)
sorry for the late reply but i read this too from ace combat the belkan war,it also has a mini kitchen!
New figure of aerobatics - "double culbit on the toilet sit" :D And toilet has an emergency release catapult :))) (joke)
Sam .AB that is truth, long range fighter
So did the Avro Lancaster WWII bomber !
I just now realized how big that plane really is. Side-by-side seating? WOW.
Massive respect for this aircraft. Love all the Sukhois.
Beautiful plane. God bless you Orthodox brothers.
yes man, God bless mother Russia ! may they destroy as soon as possible those criminal isis fools !! peace in the world those birds have to bring !!!
1:27 the way the bombs fall off looks so haphazard
impressive jet. Especially when launcing rockets!
I can't get it uout of my head that this aircraft would be an amazing private jet. Sukhoi should make a civilian version of it. Just because they can! :D
Russian brothers , from Greece
Xristos Theofilis fuck greece from russian
@@Hastasiyizdede9858 fuck Russia from Russia
@@asiftalpur3758 fuck yourself then because you ARE Russia !! pitty man ! traitor of your motherland !! go live in uSSa where there are drugs all over for you, and crime, and bad health and food, GMO's and despair, suicides and murders, neo-liberal financial FRAUD and toilet paper $$$$$$ with NO value at all against gold !
Fuck greece from MECEDONIA
One of my favorite planes. Beautiful lines and curves.
like a big body builder with muscles all over ready to smash on the enemy (isis) ! God bless mother Russia !
Good luck, Lots of love from DDR
@Talshet The sound of cracks as the building collapsed was the sound of the struts slowly deforming. Basically the shear force of the weight of one side of the building collapsed in on itself. A plane crash into the tower would of easily effected the inward skeletal structure of the building to cause it to collapse.
If your gonna argue a set up it won't be from the plane hitting the towers or the events of how they collapsed; it would be that they planed the plane crash, which is just stupid
Crazy ducks)
да это сумашедшая утка
Look at the front end of an F-111. Long duck billed nose to increase forward visibility, high side by side seating to increase the camaraderie and teamwork between pilot and b/n. This aircraft can do air to air but it's primary mission is ground target destruction. Both are fast, both can carry heavy armament loads, both are designed for long range missions.
They are both built in a heavy sturdy fashion to increase reliability.
This is an excellent aircraft, and it does borrow from the past.
SU-34: "A plane that is so freaking awesome, they put the crew sided for high-fiveing after every maneuver."
That is a mighty big camera at 0:13.
Let's just say both the Su-34 and its rival the super hornet are both great planes in their own rights
i agree we cant argue or else it will attract trolls.
+mrwong11989 Nice to see an American counterpart not raging comments, both are great, both shall always be great, and lets hope neither come marching shouting ones better =]
+mrwong11989 Nothing will beat the F-35. A.K.A Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II
+Agent Smith Oh yeah provided we will ever see one flying for more than an hour without problems.
lorenzoschiavetti197 Well they are still improving it. It wont be introduced to the US airforce till 2017 or 2018. What i am trying to say is that Russians have old school technology.
Su 34 is an outcome of what happens when you mix powerful eagle's body and wings with duck's mouth 😂. But anyways it's unique in its own way
❤
This is one of my favourite russian aircraft. It's a massive machine but still manages to be fast and graceful.
@Talshet wasn't the aluminium plane that 'cut' steel bars, it was the fire that melted the riveted bolts that in turn allowed the towers to collapse.
Its a well known engineering fact when the question arises; Which structure is safer in a fire a wood or metal? The answer is wood, Why? Even though wood burns it takes a while before its loses its rigidity.
Steel however deforms once it is heated and losses all structural rigidity at once. Causing the building to collapse.
The best bird in the sky .I love this jet .Love from Serbia
Fuck Serbia Milosevic criminales bastardo killer ok nato bombing
This should have much more views. so beautiful.
Man oh man. I totally love this beauty.
This is a light bomber, amazing how all these different aircraft have been created from the Su-27 Flanker. And the Su-34 is an amazing aircraft.
That thing is HUGE!
Im making a model kit of this aircraft. One of my all time favorite jet fighter. But the color shade for this aircraft is so hard to create.
Спасибо! Нам никто не сможет навязывать свое мнение! Россия -вперед!
The interesting thing about the plane is it's performance, the F-15E strike eagle can carry a heavier load but Su-34 has the longer range and better crew endurance
but I find su 34 has 12,000 kg of total payload while f 15E has a large total of 10,400 kg , I acquired this from wiki I would like to know your sources cuz that is wierd
Russia can more. In the near future Russia will demonstrate gorgeous technical masterpieces, as only Mr Putin will save the country from unworthy and insignificant Western financial system. Russia will be powerful, just, good, and people will be strong, both physically and in spirit. Russia will bring into this wicked world goodness and humanity, because in the consciousness of Russian citizens is collectivism, while the West is the Mavericks. Russia will bring good power and good. Long live Mr President and all the inhabitants of planet Earth. )
+Ferrur Gurerr красиво написал и близко к правде :)
Да здравствует Россия.)))
+Ferrur Gurerr ПРАВИЛЬНО НАДО МОКАТЬ В ПРАВДУ И В КРОВЬ АНГЛОСАКСОВ!!!)))
Enjoy the new caliphate of Germany ??
Well decreasing population is a concern for Russia
@looxgood Interesting, B/C I read that the Su-34's passive radar was there to compliment the Irbis AESA which has a targeting and engagement range of over 400 Km at normal power and can easily detect the F-22s hack-job stealth package, which far exceeds what our AESA is capable of.
Oh, just as a side note:
AIM-120A range: 30 Mi.
R-77 range: 50 Mi.
R-77M1 range: 110 Mi.
Even with the improvements, it is doubtful they managed to give the AIM-120 a 300% boost to range.
most beautiful russion aircraft !!!
@jjnomjqg : this aircraft is effectively slow (less than mach 2) because it's studied to fly near the ground so it's inherently slow (like the B-1B it lacks variable intakes). Anyway just because they're bigger, it doesn't mean that they're slower, actually not only they're faster but they're also more manoeuvrable than American fighters.
The "Little Duck" in russian
Contracts. The UK, Australia, and quite a few other countries have made perchases. There is a reason its called the "Joint Strike Fighter".
Su-34 is my favorite in Su-27 family...
@lukitazz568 Completely different roles. The A-10 is meant to destroy heavy armor and provide general CAS. The Su-34 is a fighter/bomber. I'm sure the Su-34 is far better at doing general bombing missions, but the A-10 is far more effective at taking out enemy armor and destroying vehicle columns.
nice bird
Nice use of the music from Command and Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars
Russia Air Force Su-34 👍👍👍
I know much more than you think.
F-18 is generally not designed for maneuverability, but to fly at low altitude, high speed.
F-18 and F-16 in the dog fight, when you go into a sharp turn, lose speed much faster than the F-15 and Su-27,because they make smaller radius turns at speeds below 450km / h than the above,in those turns they can not maintain the speed, and soon become the prey in the dog fight.with a full tank and full of weapons, F-16 has an extremely small ratio of weight and thrust
its even got a small kitchen and place where you can poop :)
There is exceptions, the F 14 is heavier than the F 15 but it is more agile. Better maneuverability plus stability at low altitudes.
Kosovo is Serbia, Fly birdie fly...
Everything is appropriate congratulations gentleman on a elaborate fighting bomber
SU-34 is GORGEOUS
Egyszerűen tökéletes!Mindenre lehet használni amire kell!Nagy,erős akár az orosz medve!
I love this fighter bird actually Russian design always amaze me this is looking cool,dangerous and like a flying goose...
Yes indeed this bird look like a fighting geese to me. ♥️👍
Russian pilots call him duckling
An advantage..the man beside you will notice if you feel sleepy. In simple, the performance of teamwork in side by side cockpit will increase. That happened in F 111 and A6 crews.
(Please forgive my English..)
what can those russians do in 3 or 4 months(they said), what americans and europeans did'nt done in 7 or 8 years with 125000 soldiers involved vs isis
+krys yacine they will just kill them !
@INSIDERMIA
Wasn't being in anyway overconfident, was commenting on how stunningly beautiful the aircraft is.
It's beautifull
I learned in school :-) I didn't wrote that SU-27 does not lose speed,but to lose a lot less than other aircraft ...
If you need tables with a rate of turn (do not know how to say in English) for the Su-27, F-15, F-16, I'll give it, it is easy to conclude which of these planes has the advantage.
Wing / loading is extremely important ... because it provides buoyancy(climg),with less speed and greater wing surface,the plane has greater buoyancy,and consequently better maneuverability.
This video is 7 years old and the SU 34 is still the best fighter in the world. The Russian airforce really is the bees knees!
This comment is 6 years old
@@hellomoto1426 and now 7 years old
When the missles are up and its down to cannon fire and agility this bird owns the sky.
Could it be, that it is just another Su-27 variant. Oh yes - it is... Sukhoi makes only one plane in different flavors.
And people are complaining, that Porsche has to many different variants on the same model...
Porsche has a great base to work from, a good chassis and a lot of experience with it.
Maybe it is the same with the SU-27 frame... If it is good and has potential for upgrades, why throw it away ?
I believe the Russians do it too with the chassis from the T72 and T80 series...
I know it was a different era, but the Germans did it with their ME109 throughout the war, keeping it upgraded to keep up with the competition. Same with the Panzer IV series. There is a world of difference between the Pz IV of 1939 and the Pz IV of 1945, despite being the same beast underneath. And the chassis was also used for the Stug series, I believe.
The Brits also, kept on pushing and updating the envelope of the original Spitfire...
Renaud Mayers
I don't think, that it is a very bad thing... However the airframe will give some limitations, which you won't have, if you'd develop individual musters.
The issue is, that the Russian military industry became somewhat lazy. There are quite a few completely new designed airframes in the west for the past two decades.... However in Russia there is basically only the PakFa... All others are just upgrades.
Dominik MJ
You are right. i'd love to see more new models coming out of Russia.
With the SU35, although it is derived from the Flanker frame, it has been very heavilly modified.
However, let's not forget the Sukhoi SU 47 Berkut, that was build and used as a test bed for a lot of the technologies now used in the SU 35.
There was also the Mig MFI /LFI 1.44... It was the first Russian attempt at a Gen 5 fighter. A couple of those technology demonstrators were built before the whole project was mothballed due to lack of funding.
We forget that Russia went through a lost decade... Between 1991 with the fall of the USSR and 2000, Russia was basically a bankrupt country. the military didn't order any new or existing planes, money dried up for the different design bureau. that they survived through that period is almost a miracle in itself.
What they managed to do upgrade wise with the Mig35 and the SU35 is testament to how good the original designs were.
The PaK FA is a brand new design but I understand there still are some problems to iron out. It's understandable when one sees the problems the US has had and still has in developing the F22 and F35.
Then, there is the Yak 130. Although it is not an advanced fighter plane, it is a very good trainer jet that can be used as a light fighter plane should the need arise.
Renaud Mayers
начнем с того, что СУ- 35 нет даже намека на стелс, хотя бы как у F- 18 и кроме того появление СУ- 35 говорит лишь о том, Т- 50 ждать- не дождаться. МИг- 35 мертворожденный все заявления о его закупке ВВС России не более чем сплетни в кулуарах( однако ВМФ России закупит партию МИГ- 29К для палубной авиации- вчера в новостях). СУ- 34 очень нужная машина для бомбардировочной авиации ( СУ- 24 устарел), хоть самолет и получился перетяжеленным, тем не менее он очень нужен, жаль, что выпускают всего 1 самолет в год( но идет модернизация производства)! ЯК- 130 дозвуковой УТС, сверхзвуковой ЯК- 140 продан Китаю.
serhio897 The Mig-35 is no gossip. It was offered to India at their competition [however it lost].
Beautiful - like every Sukhoi !!!
Darkwing Duck=)
Quite a few of those weapon releases struck the underside of the aircraft! More testing needed.....
Note that this video was uploaded in 2008, and these were put into service in 2013. I'm pretty sure they fixed that.
No, all well. This plane already testing about 20 years :) Today he is regular unit of air forces.
Its a CAS aircraft with extend capability. Making it have weapons bays for whatever reason is redundant, it doesnt need them for they would not serve any practical purpose.
This plane is a cross between 3 types of aircraft with its primary purpose being CAS, but where as most CAS planes need air dominance already in place this one can also function as a bomber and a fighter to establish it if need be, or operate in areas where air superiority is not absolute.
RJ Lee это фронтовой бомбардировщик, его задача уничтожения наземных сил противника и средств противоздушной обороны.
The Russians make beautiful aircraft. This one looks like a platypus though.
I just love this plane. The thought of what has the appearance of a big fighter having a lavatory and cooking facilities inside is so ridiculous that it comes full-circle to being awesome.
"In soviet russia..."
Ah forget it.
A disadvantage would be the helmets banging together during high speed turns, you'd have to have a good sense of humour
Fantastic
I watched this video over and over when I was a kid just to get rid of my fear or big explosion
Su 34 destroyed target nato forces
R-73 is discontinued, its replacement is r-74m fully digital. A should be added to the range of r-27ET (infra red) is 130km, which is the IR missile with the greatest range.
су-35 быстрее и проворнее чем f-15 не смотря на то что весит в 2 раза больше!)
су-34
@CartesianCat These buildings are not standing next to, between them were not damaged the building and all videos can be seen that the building in which the planes were falling vertically
America should buy these of Russia instead of that F35 plane !.
я приду с приветом, ЯДЕРНЫМ.
@@Ягд-Терьер Да задолбали вы со своими ядерными угрозами. Чувак даже ниче плохого не сказал.
The Aim-120 can pull 40g at supersonic speed. The Aim-9X is a vector thrust missile that can tell the difference between flares, chaff and an aircraft. Russia has several AA missiles that can pull over 18G. Now isn't about hitting targets from 9 miles to 140 miles out and countering attacks by very expensive gear such as stealth technology and anti-missile missiles such as a trophy system.
What's the NATO code name for this one?
OK. Thanks.
That's an American football position. "Fullback"
Thanks
dak2005vn Hellduck
It's called the "Ukraine terrorist"
One Su-34 participated in the war 080808 in option support jamming systems. Despite the fact, that in this war Russia lost several aircraft, within range of this aircraft was not even highlighting by enemy air defense system. Currently in Russia there is no modern jammer like, for example, Growler. Platform Su-34 performing the functions of strike aircraft, can provide the Russian combat aviation invulnerability.
full support for Russia from Pakistan.....
That's part of the weapon detachment system, it prevents an internal weapon jam by ejecting the pylon.
RUSSIA (USSR) NUMBER-1
@Talshet What are you on about jet fuel melting metal? Jet fuel isn't an acid its a flammable hydrocarbon. As two large objects collide at a high velocity the ignition effect occurs. The heat deformed the metal causing the struts holding up the building to weaken and collapse.
1400°C, funny that since jet engines 2000°C+.
Moving on the youngs modulus was exceeded by over 20 times in the crash. The shear modulus to buckle the building would of been its own weight.
Too bad it is a sitting duck against an F-22
***** oh yes,i remember when the russians were kicked by the Talibans in the 80's, they were beaten badly, something similar on how ISIS is over running the iraquí army.
A SU35 and PAK FA SU50 can wreck a f22 A f35 can be killd by a MIG21...
I know of 22 will no longer be manufactured only exists because some of his technology and a drug
and the Su-34 fighter and ground attack / bombing aerio not fight like your f22 nerd beast
00008HANK So much fantasy lol,you have no clue :)
For you, the trolls!
In the tail boom between the engines of the Su-34 is located the APU (auxiliary power unit) and radar rear hemisphere
russian weapones are the best weapones ..nato weapones are soft ..russian weapones heavy and deadly
Самолёт красавец
Не то слово.
Сама не раз видела его своими глазами
@neocoders
I know 1 of the reasons is so they can get to the kitchen and toilet. It also allows them to share instruments.
@Talshet Say hello to the New F-15 Silent Eagle thats already in production. It's predecessor the F-15 Eagle is undefeated in 200+ Air combat missions. This is not a simulated combat an actually air to air battle against Mirage, Migs and Sukhois.
We also heard about "acceptable losses"(TM) - you know exactly who coined this euphemism. Somebody of us even was LCC operators of Big Red Button 30 meters under ground. Duty joke was "Will you turn the Key, bro?" Duty answer was "No shit bro. Exactly I will". It has nothing with "attacking". Its all about "Who ever take the sword will perish by the sword".
2:30-2:31 the cannisters do not come off clean and one strikes the rear fusalage, you can see the aircraft pitch nose down from impact. It happens earlier in the video w/ other ordnance. Seems to have rack ejector problems or bad air flow around the weapons stores. Beautiful aircraft though....
Of course it's fluid, it's condensation trail. It's not hot air that looks like that, I said it's bombs wings hit hot air and that makes a trail
On the other hand, the more complexity you add, the more people can have a job :D
@BrianBuckShot Yes, toilets, kitchens, and plenty of room in the cockpit too. One pilot can make tea while the other's blowing stuff up - sounds suspiciously British ;)
This aircraft is an absolute masterpiece.
Good looking jet. I LOVE that color scheme.
The su34 elaborate fighting bomber can be put in the hall of fame next to zz top live to rock
That's really a handsome handsome plane...pilots side by side...
the first few shots of it with people standing around it makes it look HUGE!!! and i love that camouflage paint job, it looks so sexy, why don't other western countries put on sexy paint jobs like that.
The Su-34BF looks a worthy replacement for the Su-24BN, being able to carry some 7,000 kg of A/G ordnance plus an AK-630 cannon and a mix of R-73 and R-77 AAM's for fighting one's way to and from the target when necessary---a lesson from the Second World War implemented to this day by Frontal Aviation.
That bird will whip some NATO/US asses, LOL!!!
Yeah but dropping like flies from the sky .)