Truth about SU-34 Hell Duck: how it become World's Best Strike Fighter Jet
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 сен 2022
- The Russian Aerospace Forces’ Sukhoi Su-34 Fullback strike aircraft, also known by its nickname ‘Hellduck,’ is pretty much an anomaly among military aircraft in production today, with a mission profile that’s close to unique and in many ways a hangover from the Cold War. One aspect that’s notably impressive about the platypus-nosed jet is its ability to carry a staggeringly large amount of fuel for a tactical jet, leading to some potentially very long-range missions, even without aerial refueling. It truly is the king of the fast jets when it comes to how much gas it can lug into the air.
While the Su-34 is, at the DNA level, a member of the Flanker family of fighters, and while it retains a secondary air-to-air capability, its direct origins are as a dedicated strike aircraft - or a tactical bomber in Russian terminology. Studies for a strike-optimized development of the Su-27 Flanker began as early as 1977, with the aim of using as much of the fighter’s airframe as possible but combining it with specialized navigation/attack avionics.
------------------------------
► Please Note:
Full Credit to Owner (All images, Music, and pictures shown in the video belong to their respective owners)
------------------------------
for any quarries or copyright issues, feel free to contact us:
► themilitarycuriosity@gmail.com
------------------------------
Creative commons 3.0
creativecommons.org/licenses/...
⚡ Disclaimer:
Any footage in this video has only been used to communicate a message (understandable) to the audience. I know it’s fair use under the reviews and comments section. We don't plan to violate anyone's rights. This Channel DOES NOT Promote or encourage Any illegal activities, all contents provided by This Channel is meant for EDUCATIONAL PURPOSE only. And all content including images, and videos belongs to their respected owners, we don’t own them. Thanks.
⚡ FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
* Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is permitted by copyright statutes that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational, or personal use tips the balance favor of fair use. The Military Curiosity Channel does not own the rights to these videos and pictures. Under fair use, they have been repurposed with the intent of educating and inspiring others. 
Наука
FAB-1500 x 3 or Kinzal AM to flattern terrain
The E-2 Hawkeye is employed by the U.S. Navy. Not Airforce.
Best strike fighter 👌🏼😛😛
Yes,
Most versatile fighter bomber jet, bar none.
Things people who have never seen the F35 / F22 say lol
@@astcomjakecw these fancy jets can't even fly in bad weather conditions, lol.
First of all. That's bullshit. Secondly if your going to call a jet versitile you have to consider all modern capabilities and I have yet to see a huge fuck of passenger sized 2 seater jet resemble any stealth nor have I seen it do a VTOL take off or landing. Secondly this aircraft has not actual stand out capabilitys at all. For example ever since the late 70s all American fighters can be equipped with a whole array of precision guided ground strike weapons for example the AGM-65. This has been proven to be a absolute solid, consistent and capable weapon used across all of Americas fighter platforms yet russian fire and forget missiles absolutely suck and the fact that Russian targeting pods are so far and in-between and that they suck doesn't help the matter. The SU-34 is like the only modern jet that has a half decent targeting pod yet throughout its extended use in Ukraine there is absolutely no evidence of it locking and firing missiles that track and hit Ukrainian armoured targets. In fact there is literally no evidence of any of russian jets using fire and forget weapons on armoured columns. The only time they actually engage tanks is with the KA-52 and that's about 13km behind the zero line yet Russia say they have fire and forget weapons with range that surpasses 25km. If these missiles actually lived up to the hype this war would likely be over. A10s would destroy entire columns from 18km away in Iraq with the AGM-65 yet in 2023 the most a SU-34 can do is get a missile to hit a building or something that doesn't even have the potential to move.
Congrats to Russia. It only took them 30 years longer to produce the equivalent of the F-15 strike eagle, and they still haven't figured out how to make a jet engine that doesn't smoke or fly apart.
@@gutstompenrocker Lulz, the Sukhoi Flanker is already 40 years old, first flight 1984. And you probably think that the F-35 is a fine,problem-free plane, I'm sure, haha.
Hi ivan!! A sho na English ?
I love the looks of this craft. I wish we’d have designed and manufactured it. Can we license build just the airframe and stuff it full of American electronics, engines, and armaments?
It may be nicknamed ‘Hell Duck’ but I believe the NATO designation is ‘Fullback.’
Мы в России называем его любя - утёнок. Натовские названия российской техники никогда не совпадает с тем, как называют технику в России. Почему-то у нато они всегда звучат как-то злобно. А мы любим и ценим наших защитников, поэтому и названия добрые
it will need license
Why? It shows up on radar like a 747 and will get show down just as fast.
@@gutstompenrocker LOL. Sure, sure... Try harder.
Warning incoming American fan boy alert.
Nothing is better than anything American remember😂😅😂 just like in Ukraine, Afghanistan, Syria they're always have the best, but they always end up with the silver medal. Unless Hollywood.
What's the F15's record ?
104 wins and zero losses!
@@louisbabycos106 Come to Ukraine already with that "zero losses". LOL
This is crap. The very start of the video states a 4th generation machine in use only until Russia can figure out how to get the SU-57 out of the hanger.
6:45... How are they working for you? They should call this NATO CALLSIGN: Sitting Duck! RIP
I thought this was a bomber
It is a bomber, but is so versatile that it can be used in attack and fighter scenarios!!
It's a strike fighter. Predominantly it's ideal role is air to ground but it can do air to air . It's a very different jet than the American navy F18 superhornet but it's does the same role minus taking off and landing on a carrier . It can fight air to air to get to the target drop bombs , air to ground bombs and air to ground missiles and fight it's way back air to air if it had to . At least in theory.
Bom của Mỹ ném cách xa mấy chục cây số lượn tới mục tiêu , còn cái máy bay này phải bay sát mặt đất để thả bom ba cái đồ công nghệ bèo
20% of inventory lost in the last 2 years
If you believe your own propaganda.Sooo much coping LOL. So UAF is in Moskva, you say... LOL
@@marka6395 We only count photo evidence shoot downs. Explain?
The plane that needs another plane to fly with it and has been shot down en masse during recent combat sorties is the best strike fighter in the world?
Ummmh... F-15EX enters the chat.... what did you say in that title?
They do look impressive, while sitting in some Ukranian farmers field.
They sure do get shot down fast
Just like absolutely any plane
like the ghost of kiev? Oh wait
this may be a beautiful aircraft, but it's not EVEN close to being the best attack aircraft in the world... I'd fly it though. There is something very elegant about side by side cockpits like the A 6 or the 4 person EW variant.
People seem to forget that this aircraft supposedly has fire and forget missiles with the range of 30km yet there is no evidence of these missiles being used to hit Ukrainian armoured targets during the SU-34s extended use in Ukraine. The SU-34 is like their only modern jet that has a targeting pod and it's nothing like the telar flir pods NATO fighters have and so target tracking sucks but also literally like 90 percent of NATOs aircraft since the late 70s have come with the ability to use the AGM-65 which is a highly proven and highly successful fire and forget missile yet Russia relys on the KA-52 to launch beam riding missiles from 10km away instead and as of recently they have stopped using this because they lost so many KA-52s that it became counter productive. It's the same with their anti radiation missiles they say that they have them but they never use them. Russia had absolutely everything it needed to take air superiority in Ukraine yet somehow it never came close and now resorts to attacks that are becoming more and more rare because their air bases are coming under fire. Not to mention just 2 days ago they shot their own SU-35 down and days before that one of these SU-34 just crashed for some reason. Russia are losing jets fast but largely to their own pilots and aging airframes.
🤣🤣🤣@@brookwhiteman9810 Такого бреда я ещё не читал
Spoliler: it's not
Fact not an American fan boy opinion. Yes it is & it's proven it
Para la FUERZA AERIA DEL PERU FAP DEBERIAN COMPRAR ESTOS AVIONES RUSOS COMO LOS SU 34 Y SU 35. EL SU 34 ES UN CAZA PARA LARGA DISTANCIA COMPREN.
@@DavyRo by What?
It is
Americans planes are expensive and infective
There is NO SUCH THING as the Su-35, nor is there any such thing as the J-16, employed by China. Russia does, however, have a MiG-35.
? I’m not sure I follow, as you seem emphatic and confident; maybe I’m missing something.
The Su-30, Su-33, Su-34, and Su-35 are all derivatives of the Su-27 Flanker. The Shenyang J-16 is derived from the J-11, which in turn has its progenitor in the Sukhoi Su-27.
The Su-35 and the J-16 certainly do exist.
with that logic there is no such thing as a mig 35 either
The Russians lost like 35 of these since the war started lol
Best against civilians and untrained Syrian rebels
F-15 is far better
By getting shot down in Ukraine 🤣
Who was it that lost a modern state of the art stealth fighter to 40 year old soviet S-125 Neva back in 1999? Oh that's right, the US 🤣
Currently blasting UA positions in Adiivka and Bakhmut with precision guided bombs but ok...
Oh yeah mean Ukraine shot down a few migs and lie about numbers? Wonder what they used - oh yeah S300 soviet air defences from......drum roll.....Russia
@@medved4030 moskva is on the bottom of the sea Oh that's right
@@worfoz Along with the US/EU economy.
@@medved4030 We still have more than enough money to send more Leopards to Ukraine.
Our economies are fine, and so is our military equipment.
You'll find out soon
Best strike fighter.. maybe in Russia.. not even top 10.
You only know how to chat, Russian technology has repeatedly proved its effectiveness. In the West, of course, they lie a lot and talk back.