"The authors of the Gospels never claimed to know the life of the Messiah?" Matthew was a disciple of Jesus. John was also the beloved disciple of Jesus.
@@ericsower7022 Hi there.... so what a technical discrepancy! I will tell you what, it is claimed to be the word of god and without error....for if it had errors then god would be fallible which is kind of a big thing in religion. The point I hope you see is because of 'a technical error' or blatant lies you really cannot trust Paul's scriptures to be reliable testimony. You of course know Paul did not have his claimed conversion until some time after 36AD, while the Jesus guy died in 30 or 33AD, depending on who is counting...So Paul never actually meet Jesus before his death, nor did Paul witness any of the biblical claims which is another big deal considering his scriptures make most of the main bible claims! Remember Galatians 1:11-16 Paul's scriptures contain no eye witness accounts, no information from any other person and no information from any other source, that is if you can believe Paul! See were this is going?
I agree that Paul did not strip the gospels of their Jewish content, but the gospels happened before Paul even got saved and then later on wrote letters to different parts of the body of Yehoshua HaMeshiach (the original Hebrew Name of Jesus Christ). To say his letters preceded the gospels doesn’t make sense. But out of curiosity, what do you mean?
@@FreeinChristForever not only it make sense, it is possible to demonstrate gospels were inspired by paulinism. Of course, hardline believers will remain in denial.
@@tulenik71 What in the world is “paulism?” Is this some new type of religion that I’ve never heard of? If you’re speaking of Paul the apostle then he’d be the first in line to be a witness AGAINST you for before he was Paul he was Saul and Saul hated ANYTHING and EVERYTHING to do with Christ and His followers to the point of putting them in prison to murdering them.
@FreeinChristForever we all know what paulism iS. pauls take on christinaity. Focus more on faith than works, play down jewish practices like removal of foreskin, etc.
Studying the history of the Orthodox Christians is a worthwhile exercise for people interested in Christian history. We in the West tend to ignore this side of Christianity, but that's a mistake if we're really interested in origins of our faith.
Absolutely agree the reason the early heresies were in the East is that’s where most of the battles over beliefs was waged Rome was pretty much a backwater in comparison to Constantinople
Yeah I've been having these thoughts, mostly for conversion reasons. Unbelievers will throw this stuff at you all day but also it really is quite interesting. For example as you state as much as I disagree with Catholic doctrine(s) I cannot discount the fact that I wouldn't know anything about Christ if the CC were not is it was in terms of dominance. It's where I step back and just trust that God knows what he is doing.
@@greglongmore6503 So you disagree with the Catholic teachings, do you? Hmm, so what is it ? You disagree with is it about divorce perhaps? Jesus was really clear about that! Matthew 19: 9 Now I say this to you: anyone who divorces his wife -- I am not speaking of an illicit marriage -- and marries another, is guilty of adultery.'
@@greglongmore6503 About Idolatry Exodus 20:4 You shall not make yourself a carved image or any likeness of anything in heaven above or on earth beneath or in the waters. The Lord did not prohibit statues; he prohibited worshiping them. God actually commanded the making of images. Just five chapters later, God commanded Moses to build the Ark of the Covenant, which would contain the presence of God and was to be venerated as the holiest place in all of Israel. Here is what God commanded Moses concerning the statues on it: And you shall make two cherubim of gold; of hammered work shall you make them, on the two ends of the mercy seat. Make one cherub on the one end, and one cherub on the other end; of one piece with the mercy seat shall you make the cherubim on its two ends (Ex. 25:18-19). In Numbers 21:8-9, not only did our Lord order Moses to make another statue in the form of a bronze serpent, but he commanded the children of Israel to look at it in order to be healed. The context of the passage is one where Israel had rebelled against God, and a plague of deadly snakes was sent as a just punishment. This statue of a snake had no power of itself-we know from John 3:14 that it was merely a type of Christ-but God used this image of a snake as an instrument to effect healing in his people. Further, in 1 Kings 6, Solomon built a temple for the glory of God, described as follows: In the inner sanctuary he made two cherubim of olivewood, each ten cubits high. . . . He put the cherubim in the innermost part of the house. . . . He carved all the walls of the house round about with carved figures of cherubim and palm trees, and open flowers, in the inner and outer rooms. . . . For the entrance to the inner sanctuary he made doors of olivewood. . . . He covered the two doors of olivewood with carvings of cherubim, palm trees, and open flowers; he overlaid them with gold (1 Kgs. 6:23, 27, 29, 31, 32). King Solomon ordered the construction of multiple images of things both “in heaven above” (angels) and “in the earth beneath” (palm trees and open flowers). After the completion of the temple, God declared he was pleased with its construction (1 Kgs. 9:3). It becomes apparent, given the above evidence, that a strictly literal interpretation of Exodus 20:2-5 is erroneous. Otherwise, we would have to conclude that God prohibits something in Exodus 20 and elsewhere commands the very same thing. Why would God use these images of serpents, angels, palm trees, and open flowers? Why didn’t he heal the people directly rather than use a “graven image”? Why didn’t he command Moses and Solomon to build an ark and a temple without any images at all? First, God knows what his own commandments mean. He never condemned the use of statues absolutely. Second, God created man as a being who is both spiritual and physical. To draw us to himself, God uses both spiritual and physical means. He will use statues, the temple, or even creation itself to guide us to our heavenly home. Psalm 19:1 tells us: “The heavens are telling the glory of God; and the firmament proclaims his handiwork.” Romans 1:20 says: “Ever since the creation of the world his invisible nature, namely, his eternal power and deity, has been clearly perceived in the things that have been made.” Gazing at a sunset-or a great painting of a sunset-and contemplating the greatness of God through the beauty of his creation is not idolatry. Nor is it idolatrous to look at statues of great saints of old and honor them for the great things God has done through them. It is no more idolatrous for us to desire to imitate their holy lives and honor them than it was for Paul to exhort the Corinthians to imitate his own holy life (1 Cor. 4:16) and to “esteem very highly” those who were “over [the Thessalonians] in the Lord and admonish [them]” (1 Thess. 5:12-13). Having statues honoring God or great saints brings to mind. For Catholics, having statues is just as natural as-having pictures in our wallets to remind us of the ones we love here on earth. But reminding ourselves of loved ones is a far cry from idolatry.
I think your reference of Jesus travelling through Palestine is not historically accurate. Jesus traveled through Judea, also known as the land of Canaan. The people in this area called Philistines originated as an immigrant group from the Aegean (Greece) that settled in Canaan. The land was renamed in 132-136 CE, by the Roman emperor Hadrian to Syria-Palaestina, the Jews traditional enemies, as punishment for the Jews insurrection at that time.
Here is some scripture that may clear the question about Jesus (Presonall) FOUNDED the RC Church. Read Matthew! Jesus came to establish the covenant Made between GOD and Abraham: Matthew 4:23 And Jesus went about all Galilee, teaching in their synagogues, and preaching the gospel of the Kingdom, Matthew 15:24, "But He (Jesus) answered and said, `I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.'" Jesus only interfaced with two (the woman and the Centurian) non-Jews throughout His total recorded Ministry. Jesus states His (total) purpose of his ministry: establish the Kingdom in Israel. Matthew 10:1-8, Jesus directed the Apostles (Peter, James, John...etc.) to minister to the Jews and NOT go to the Gentiles
@@elizabethmargaretroberts6727the current “Jews” aren’t the same as the original Christian Jews tho. They’re mostly Asian and polish etc. they adopted the title. Palestinians are genetically closer to what biblical Jews and Christian’s were
@@grdama quote--Here is some scripture that may clear the question about Jesus (Presonall) FOUNDED the RC Church...unquote THAT IS ODD!! Not once is a church named Catholic ever mentioned in ANY BIBLE! That incliuides Catholic bibles!!! FACT--First account of a church named catholic is by Ignatius of Antioch in 107AD!!!
Just toured Spain ,Italy and eastern Orthodox countries , then Israel , Jerusalem and Bethlehem - been to most of the historic areas Jesus walked and was born and crucified ....continuing my studies of religion and history . thank you!
READ ! Timothy ch.4 ,v.1-3 ............"TEACHINGS OF DEMONS "....... & "forbidding TO MARRY ", read , MATHEW CH.23. V 9 Do not call ANYONE on earth FATHER. !!
According to the Holy Quran, Jesus didn't claim that he was the son of Allah(God) But He said... Zuhruf 64 I seek refugee in Allah from the Satan. In the name of Allah ,Rahman ,Rahim "Allah is my Lord and your Lord. So worship Him. This is a straight path." ----------------- And on the resurrection day Allah will ask Jesus about the Christian faith. Quran - Maaide 116-118 And [beware the Day] when Allah will say, "O Jesus, Son of Mary, did you say to the people, 'Take me and my mother as deities (gods) besides Allah?'" He will say, "Exalted are You! It was not for me to say that to which I have no right. If I had said it, You would have known it. You know what is within myself, and I do not know what is within Yourself. Indeed, it is You who is Knower of the unseen. I said not to them except what You commanded me - to worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord. And I was a witness over them as long as I was among them; but when You took me up, You were the Observer over them, and You are, over all things, Witness. If You should punish them - indeed they are Your servants; but if You forgive them - indeed it is You who is the Exalted in Might, the Wise. ---------------- If you love Jesus, accept him as a Messenger not as the God and not as the son of Allah. If you are follower of Jesus, believe in Messenger Muhammad, too. Because that's what he really wants you to do. And he heralded the coming of Messenger Muhammed. Jesus said to his people this👇👇👇 Quran -Saff -6 And [mention] when Jesus, the son of Mary, said, "O children of Israel, indeed I am the messenger of Allah to you confirming what came before me of the Torah and bringing good tidings of a messenger to come after me, whose name is Ahmad." But when he came to them with clear evidences, they said, "This is obvious magic." Quran -Women 171 O People of the Scripture, do not commit excess in your religion or say about Allah except the truth. The Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, was but a messenger of Allah and His word which He directed to Mary and a soul [created at a command] from Him. So believe in Allah and His messengers. And do not say, "Three"; desist - it is better for you. Indeed, Allah is but one God. Exalted is He above having a son. To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth. And sufficient is Allah as Disposer of affairs. ---------------------------- I invite you to be a Muslim. Latest, last and only valid religion in the Hereafter. First step is to say "I witness that there is no god but ALLAH, and i witness that Mohammad is Messenger of Allah" and believe in this. Islam is a monotheistic religion. Allah doesn't accept the existence of false deities and He orders humanity to believe in only one God, Him. He explains why it is impossible the existence of gods other than Him in Holy Quran in chapter Isra which means The Night Journey and in chapter Enbiya which means Prophets. Quran-Isra-43 Say, [O Muhammad], "If there had been with Him [other] gods, as they say, then they [each] would have sought to the Owner of the Throne a way." Exalted is He and high above what they say by great sublimity. The seven heavens and the earth and whatever is in them exalt Him. And there is not a thing except that it exalts [Allah] by His praise, but you do not understand their [way of] exalting. Indeed, He is ever Forbearing and Forgiving. Quran-Prophets-22 Had there been within the heavens and earth gods besides ALLAH, they both would have been ruined. So exalted is Allah, Lord of the Throne, above what they describe. -------------------- Six Pillars of Faith in Islam 1-To believe in Omnipotent Allah (GOD) (without ascribing partners to Him. Without saying "He has a son." Without saying "He has a helper out of weakness") 2-Angels (Without giving them woman names. Without saying "They are daughters of Allah") 3-All Holy Scriptures (Books revealed by Allah) 4-All Messengers (accepting them as human beings not gods or sons of God) 5-Judgement Day (Resurrection Day) 6-Destiny Five Pillars of Islam 1- SHAHADA To say "I witness that there is no god save Allah, and i witness that Muhammad is His Messenger." 2- SALAT To perform prayer 5 times a day. 3- SAWM Fasting in the month Ramadan according to lunar calendar. (29-30 days) 4- ZAKAT If you are rich you give alms to poor people. 5- HAJJ To make the pilgrimage to Mecca, Kaba if you can afford. You become a pilgrim after this visit.
Allah is satan. Islam was invented by satan to try undermine the one and only true God and Jesus. Please read. Exodus 20 1-5 The existence of allah and mohumad is a blasphemy to the Lord God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Jesus says NOBODY comes to the Father EXCEPT through ME! The only way to salvation is through repentance of your sins and belief that the Lord Jesus Christ Yeshua died on the cross for our sins and iniquity and was raised back to life on the third day (as witnessed by hundreds) your salvation is not by works or how many times a day you pray but through the blood of Christ JESUS who died for YOU and me. I will pray for you brother. You must repent, reject Islam and follow JESUS, the son of David and Abraham!
I had about two minutes. The narrator says that Jesus chose 70 Gentiles, that’s not accurate and so it makes me doubt the accuracy of rest of this video. Gentiles we’re not brought in until Paul’s ministry.
Actually, gentiles were not accepted until Peter's ministry. ref Acts chapter 10 with the convertion of Cornelius which was btw 50-55AD about 20 years after Jesus's death
Many gentiles did follow Jesus but were never accepted into the fold. When Jesus encounters a Jew He says follow me but when encountering a gentile, even if the gentile says' I want to follow you', Jesus says no, go now and tell others what you have seen. I'm afraid even Jesus rejected the gentiles because He was trying to fix Judaism first
@@marcelsantos203 Yes for the most part Jesus did avoid gentiles but scriptures show He did not turn them away if they needed His help. See Matthew 15:22, Luke 7:1-10 and John 4 as well.
Correction: John wrote John and was a disciple from the beginning."That which we have SEEN and HEARD from the beginning" Eyewitnesses. Matthew was a tax collector(educated) disciple. Mark wrote Peters recollections around 60 AD(peter crucified 67). Luke was a doctor who interviewed eyewitnesses including Mary. Your commentary on Jesus dual nature was accurate.
@@nosuchthing8 Yep, a "Greek" (or non-Jewish) doctor. The other 3 gospel accounts were written by Jews. Luke's gospel is arranged more like a historical account, mostly in temporal order. The other three are arranged thematically, with less regard for how events unfolded along the timeline.
There were several direct inaccuracies about what is written in the NT. I get the impression the makers got most of this from 2nd hand sources as opposed to taking it directly from the NT and the Gospels. There is no other book in the world where the 2nd hand accounts of the text is more inaccurate that the Bible. Both books and secular scholars just flat out claim the exact opposite of what the text says on a regular basis. And its goes totally unquestioned.
Luke lived and worked many years along side Paul and the Apostles, the opening of his gospel makes clear he worked diligently with purpose to record a declaration of the first hand eyewitnesses of Christ from the beginning and give assurance that the order and detail of these things are for certain. The vid also said "illiterate" fisherman. WOW That is grossly inaccurate as most fishermen were basically small business owners who had to be literal to run their business under the Roman Empire. Fisherman were in fact more literal and better educated than the average citizen.
In the face of adversity, you found strength, redemption, and a new purpose in life. 🙏💪 It's truly remarkable to see how your life has been turned around.
2:43 Already had a reputation as a political and religious agitator, especially among the Romans. Where do they get this? Mk.15:10 indicates that Pilate knew that it was from envy that the religious leaders delivered him up, and all 4 Gospels have Pilate wanting to release him because didn't find cause for saying he was a political agitator. So the Romans knew that his agitation was religious but not political. He said "Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's and to what is God's
👏🏼 right on however the Romans feared the rising of Jesus’s followers because they were willing to die for the faith so in order to control the people they created the Catholic church in order to embrace the christian’s & have the control- there’s many documentary’s about this, & it makes sense - the catholic church doesn’t even follow Jesus’s teachings why? because they truly didn’t know the truth & the way which is Jesus! they worship Mary not Jesus
I did a double take on that too. Christ was no politician, or governmental political agitator, at all, though he did get under the skin of the Pharisees and Sadducees, quite often, which was a good thing, but it got him crucified. I still picture those Jewish religious leaders saying to each other, "We got him. No more trouble from him."
The purpose of Jesus Christ is not the preservation of the world but rather the preservation of the human soul,to save the soul from eternal destruction.
Mathew 17 Jesus replied, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by flesh and blood, but by my Father in heaven. 18 And I tell you that you are Peter,[a] and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades[b] will not overcome it. 19 I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be[c] bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be[d] loosed in heaven Rock/peter/cepha
MATTHEW CHAPTER 16: VERSE 18.ARE 3 PARTS #1. THE CHANGING NAME OF SIMON BAR-JONAH > SIMON CEPHAS [ JOHN CHAPTER 1: VERSE 41- 42.] #2. THE ANOUCEMENT OF THE FOUNDATION OF OUR FAITH. THE DEATH OF THE SACRIFICE #3. THE TRIUMPHANT VICTORY AGAINST HELL AND THE GLORIOUS LIFE. IN VERSE 21. REPEATING VERSE 18.#1. THE FOUNDATION OF OUR FAITH #2. 2ND THE DEATH OF THE SACRIFICE #3. THE TRIUMPHANT RESURRECTION THESE WAS CONFIRMED AND ATTESTED BY APOSTLE PAUL IN 1ST CORINTHIANS CHAPTER 15: ACCORDING TO THE SCRIPTURES [ PLURAL SCRIPTURES FROM THE OLD TESTAMENT 1. GENESIS CHAPTER 3: VERSE 15. THE BIRTH OF THE HOLY SEED SACRIFICE. THE DEATH OF THE SACRIFICE LAMB < GENESIS CHAPTER 3: VERSE 21. THE TRIUMPHANT VICTORY OF LIFE < GENESIS CHAPTER 3: VERSE 24. ISAIAH CHAPTER 6: VERSE 13.THE HOLY SEED ISAIAH CHAPTER 7: VERSE 14 ISAIAH CHAPTER 8: VERSE 14- VERSE 16 ISAIAH CHAPTER 9: VERSE 6 ISAIAH CHAPTER 40: VERSE 3,VERSE 23. ISAIAH CHAPTER 42: VERSE 1,VERSE 6,VERSE 11 ISAIAH CHAPTER 43: VERSE 10,VERSE 15 ISAIAH CHAPTER 44: VERSE 6,VERSE 8 ISAIAH 45: VERSE 15 ISAIAH CHAPTER 53: VERSE 10, VERSE 15 LUKE CHAPTER 1: VERSE 35.THE HOLY SEED MATTHEW CHAPTER 1: VERSE 18 THE HOLY SEED LUKE CHAPTER 2: VERSE 32 MATTHEW CHAPTER 12: VERSE 21.[ ACCORDING TO THE SCRIPTURES ISAIAH CHAPTER 42: VERSE 1, VERSE 6,VERSE 11. THE GENTILES PEOPLE ARE INCLUDING IN THE PLAN OF REDEMPTION AND SALVATION> MALACHI CHAPTER 1: VERSE 1,VERSE 6,VERSE 11.> ACTS CHAPTER 9: VERSE 5,VERSE 15,VERSE 17-18. < JOHN CHAPTER 10: VERSE 16.LETTER B.,JOHN CHAPTER 15: VERSE 20.,JOHN CHAPTER 17: VERSE 20., JOHN CHAPTER 20: VERSE 21.I.N.G, VERSE 29.LETTER B. THE GENTILES PEOPLE ARE INCLUDING IN THE REDEMPTION AND SALVATION. ) ACCORDING TO THE SCRIPTURES < JOHN CHAPTER 1: VERSE 1,VERSE 6,VERSE 14,VERSE 18,VERSE 29,VERSE 33,VERSE 36. THE 1ST APPEARANCE OF GOD THROUGH THE HOLY SEED , IN THE NEW TESTAMENT #2. 2ND APPEARANCE OF GOD THROUGH THE GLORIFIED BODY ACCORDING TO THE SCRIPTURES < ISAIAH CHAPTER 28: VERSE 16,VERSE 19. JOHN CHAPTER 2: VERSE 19,VERSE 21,VERSE 22. MATTHEW CHAPTER 10: VERSE 23., JOHN CHAPTER 14: VERSE 3., MATTHEW CHAPTER 28: MARK CHAPTER 26: LUKE CHAPTER 24: JOHN CHAPTER 20: THE 2ND APPEARANCE OF GOD THROUGH THE GLORIFIED BODY #3. THE 3RD APPEARING OF GOD SHALL BE IN THE 3RD COMING OF GOD> LUKE CHAPTER 17: VERSE 37 LUKE CHAPTER 18: VERSE 8 LUKE CHAPTER 19: VERSE 27. NO LONGER AS LAMB, NO LONGER AS PRIEST, NO LONGER AS PRINCE, BUT LORD OF lords, KING OF kings, GOD OF gods < JOSHUA CHAPTER 22: VERSE 22., JEREMIAH CHAPTER 10: VERSE 10. 2ND THESALONIANS CHAPTER 1: VERSE 8. ISAIAH CHAPTER 24: VERSE 23., MATTHEW CHAPTER 24: VERSE 28,VERSE 30,VERSE 32. REVELATIONS CHAPTER 1: VERSE 7-8, VERSE 17-18., ACTS CHAPTER 1: VERSE 10- 12., AMOS CHAPTER 4: VERSE 12- 13., AMOS CHAPTER 8: VERSE 9.THE LORD GOD ALL MIGHTY. 🙏 HE SHALL COME AND REIGN IN MOUNT OF OLIVES 🫒 MATTHEW CHAPTER 28: VERSE 16., ACTS CHAPTER 1: VERSE 10- 12., ISAIAH CHAPTER 24: VERSE 23.LETTER C. IN MOUNT ZION, IN JERUSALEM, IN ISRAEL 🇮🇱, NOT SOMEWHERE ELSE IN THE PARTS OF THE EARTH/ GLOBE/ WORLD. TO REIGN 1,000 YEARS OF PEACE AND PROSPERITY. GOD BLESS US ALL 🇺🇸 🌎 🇺🇲
LIKE IN THE OLD TESTAMENT GOD APPEARED TO PROPHET ABRAHAM 3XTIMES IN DIFFERENT WAYS [ NOT SIMULTANEOUSLY, BUT IN DIFFERENT TIMES OF SITUATIONS] #1. 1ST APPEARANCE TO ABRAHAM GENESIS CHAPTER 14: VERSE 18. IN PRIESTHOOD APPEARANCE #2. 2ND APPEARANCE TO ABRAHAM GENESIS CHAPTER 18: VERSE 2,VERSE 20. IN ANGELIC JUDGE APPEARANCE IN GENESIS CHAPTER 18: VERSE 14. HE PROMISE TO ABRAHAM AND SARAH TO COMING BACK AGAIN. #3. 3RD APPEARANCE TO ABRAHAM IN GENESIS CHAPTER 21: VERSE 1. IN LIFE APPEARANCE. THE SAME IN THE NEW TESTAMENT 3XTIMES APPEARANCE #1. 1ST APPEARANCE JOHN CHAPTER 1:VERSE 6,VERSE 14,VERSE 28,VERSE 29,VERSE 33,VERSE 36. AS SACRIFICE LAMB APPEARANCE #2. 2ND APPEARANCE JOHN CHAPTER 2: VERSE 19, VERSE 21,VERSE 22., MATTHEW CHAPTER 10:: VERSE 23., JOHN CHAPTER 14: VERSE 3., MATTHEW CHAPTER 28: MARK CHAPTER 16: LUKE CHAPTER 24: JOHN CHAPTER 20: AS GLORIFIED BODY [ OF THE HOLY SEED < JOHN CHAPTER 12: VERSE 24., JOHN CHAPTER 12: VERSE 28., JOHN CHAPTER 13:: VERSE 31- VERSE 32., JOHN CHAPTER 14: VERSE 22., JUDAS CHAPTER 1: VERSE 3, VERSE 9,VERSE 20.THE MOST HOLY FAITH. #3. 3RD APPEARING SHALL BE IN THE 3RD COMING LUKE CHAPTER 17: VERSE 37 LUKE CHAPTER 18: VERSE 8 LUKE CHAPTER 19: VERSE 27 LUKE CHAPTER 21: VERSE 25- 26 MATTHEW CHAPTER 24: VERSE 28,VERSE 30,VERSE 32. MATTHEW CHAPTER 25: REVELATIONS CHAPTER 1: VERSE 7-8, VERSE 17-18, REVELATIONS CHAPTER 19: ISAIAH CHAPTER 24 VERSE 23. AMOS CHAPTER 4: VERSE 12- 13., AMOS CHAPTER 8: VERSE 9. DANIEL CHAPTER 7: VERSE 9,VERSE 13. IN GLORIOUS ANCIENTS DAYS, ISAIAH CHAPTER 24: VERSE 23. IN ANCIENTS GLORIOUSLY REIGN. GOD BLESS US ALL 🇺🇸 🌎 🇺🇲
There are lots of inaccuracies in this video; subtle but important. The first clue to anyone paying attention is the use of Common Era (CE) and BCE instead of AD and BC. Christians would never do that.
@@nbenefiel And for what reason should they stop calling the presocratics - the philosophers before Socrates - by the name of presocratics? Catholics will so easily follow after the communists. It is a marriage made in heaven.
@David19746 Why? Most of us don't feel it is normal driving from orgy too orgy hopping from bed to bed from filthy harlot to filthy harlots. That's why. We shouldn't just change things just because a radical pointy headed professor thinks we should.
Actually, Paul was highly educated Luke was a physician (not a sinner from the street or poor man) Matthew was a definitely educated and wealthy man working in “irs” so to speak
@@someguy5438 They were way passed the bronze age by that point but your point still stands. Also Matthew didn't work in the 'IRS' lol, he was just a straight up tax collector
@firelxrd420 3300 BC The Bronze Age timeline is different in areas all over the world so the years can change depending on each historical civilization. However, most historians agree that it began around 3300 BCE and lasted almost 2000 years until around 1200 BCE. Dong correct me if you are wrong.
@@someguy5438 How am I wrong? You literally just said it lasted until around 1200 BC. So a thousand years before Christ. And we're talking about the antourage of Christ. What?
Not all of the time. They were accepted for large periods of time until they refused to carry out Roman god worship rituals which had been written into law by one of the emperors - I forget which one. The Romans were brutal but generally didn't try to wipe out worship of other deities.
That your Pastors taught you, read the Bible and there are Christian but persecuted until they won population, don't listen to your Pastors, only hatred in their heart..
@@dailyviewstv5323 Question: "Are Catholic beliefs and practices biblical?" Answer: The issue concerning any church and its practices should be "Is this Biblical?" If a teaching is Biblical (taken in context), it should be embraced. If it is not, it should be rejected. God is more interested in whether a church is doing His will and obeying His Word than whether it can trace a line of succession back to Jesus' apostles. Jesus was very concerned about abandoning the Word of God to follow the traditions of men (Mark 7:7). Traditions are not inherently invalid-there are some good and valuable traditions. Again, the issue must be whether a doctrine, practice, or tradition is Biblical. How then does the Roman Catholic Church compare with the teachings of the Word of God? Salvation: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that salvation is by baptismal regeneration and is maintained through the Catholic sacraments unless a willful act of sin is committed that breaks the state of sanctifying grace. The Bible teaches that we are saved by grace which is received through simple faith (Ephesians 2:8-9), and that good works are the result of a change of the heart wrought in salvation (Ephesians 2:10; 2 Corinthians 5:17) and the fruit of that new life in Christ (John 15). Assurance of salvation: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that salvation cannot be guaranteed or assured. 1 John 5:13 states that the letter of 1 John was written for the purpose of assuring believers of the CERTAINTY of their salvation. Good Works: The Roman Catholic Church states that Christians are saved by meritorious works (beginning with baptism) and that salvation is maintained by good works (receiving the sacraments, confession of sin to a priest, etc.) The Bible states that Christians are saved by grace through faith, totally apart from works (Titus 3:5; Ephesians 2:8-9; Galatians 3:10-11; Romans 3:19-24). Baptism: In the New Testament baptism is ALWAYS practiced AFTER saving faith in Christ. Baptism is not the means of salvation; it is faith in the Gospel that saves (1 Corinthians 1:14-18; Romans 10:13-17). The Roman Catholic Church teaches baptismal regeneration of infants, a practice never found in Scripture. The only possible hint of infant baptism in the Bible that the Roman Catholic Church can point to is that the whole household of the Philippian jailer was baptized in Acts 16:33. However, the context nowhere mentions infants. Acts 16:31 declares that salvation is by faith. Paul spoke to all of the household in verse 32, and the whole household believed (verse 34). This passage only supports the baptism of those who have already believed, not of infants. Prayer: The Roman Catholic Church teaches Catholics to not only pray to God, but also to petition Mary and the saints for their prayers. Contrary to this, we are taught in Scripture to only pray to God (Matthew 6:9; Luke 18:1-7). Priesthood: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that there is a distinction between the clergy and the "lay people," whereas the New Testament teaches the priesthood of all believers (1 Peter 2:9). Sacraments: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that a believer is infused with grace upon reception of the sacraments. Such teaching is nowhere found in Scripture. Confession: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that unless a believer is hindered, the only way to receive the forgiveness of sins is by confessing them to a priest. Contrary to this, Scripture teaches that confession of sins is to be made to God (1 John 1:9). Mary: The Roman Catholic Church teaches, among other things, that Mary is the Queen of Heaven, a perpetual virgin, and the co-redemptress who ascended into heaven. In Scripture, she is portrayed as an obedient, believing servant of God, who became the mother of Jesus. None of the other attributes mentioned by the Roman Catholic Church have any basis in the Bible. The idea of Mary being the co-redemptress and another mediator between God and man is not only extra-biblical (found only outside of Scripture), but is also unbiblical (contrary to Scripture). Acts 4:12 declares that Jesus is the only redeemer. 1 Timothy 2:5 proclaims that Jesus is the only mediator between God and men. Many other examples could be given. These issues alone clearly identify the Catholic Church as being unbiblical. Every Christian denomination has traditions and practices that are not explicitly based on Scripture. That is why Scripture must be the standard of Christian faith and practice. The Word of God is always true and reliable. The same cannot be said of church tradition. Our guideline is to be: "What does Scripture say?" (Romans 4:3; Galatians 4:30; Acts 17:11). 2 Timothy 3:16-17 declares, "All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting, and training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work."
@@dailyviewstv5323 sadly the bible isn't a very historically correct document and has been messed with over the years. Unlike a lot of US citizens I don't have some 'hokey' pastor, I prefer facts.
You completely skipped over the fact that Nero also had St. Peter killed by crucifixion upside-down. He is literally the "Rock of the Church." His remains are directly under the main alter at St. Peter's Basilica in Vatican City.
The papacy has lied about so many things, that we really don't know if Peter is there or not. After all, they lied about him being the first pope appointed by Jesus, lied about Sunday being the new Lord's Day, lied about the mass murders of the inquisitions, about Mary being the queen of heaven, about the pope being christ on earth, etc etc. Romanism, in fact, is the ultimate counterfeit church, created by the father of lies, to pervert the simple gospel.
@@leonflores2933 AMEN. And since Jesus didn't appoint Peter or ANY popes, the whole catholic church collapses. Since the catholic church was not started by Jesus or the apostles, it is a bastard child of Constantine and an orphan. That is why God tells His people to get out of her and avoid her pagues.
@@heydeereman1040 Every papist makes these baseless decrees with exactly ZERO evidence, as if repeating the lie often enough, as Hitler said to do, would actually make it real. What bullshit. Now,how about showing some Gardiner evidence that Peter was somehow a pope, as if popes are biblical at ALL.PS: just quoting Matthew 16 does not count, since there is NO MENTION of any pope there. And there is no other scripture to twist into this doctrine, so you're outta luck. The man of sin In the Vatican is a complete SCAM
Years ago I watched a panel of theologians discussing the Bible. I came to believe the Bible speaks to each of our circumstances & we get something different from it each time we read it.
lol - Ancient people living under Kings, Dictators used them as a template for God - hence all the Get down on our knees, beg, grovel, blindly obey, sing only his Praises etc Simple, primitive people without much knowledge of the world around them envisioned an afterworld that was similar to the life they had in the REAL WORLD - a King like God sitting on his throne in the heavens, Heaven is his Kingdom and only those who believe and support him are allowed in. The rest left to suffer You are praying to long dead Kings, Dictators
The Catholics attribute Jesus saying something like "upon this rock I'll build my church". Church in old Greek is ekklesía, which means assembly. Catholics argue that Jesus meant assembly as an institution, i.e. a permanent assembly. And also claim that Jesus mean Peter, the first Pope, to be the "rock", as Peter comes from the old Greek Petros meaning "rock". This is why they claim Catholicism was established by Jesus himself.
Some if the statements are wrong. The gospel written was inspired by the Spirit of God through His men. Is not collective memory. Mr. Luke wrote on accounts of what he saw. And Christianity started within Jews in jaruselm by 12 and later 70 72 before it went outside
@@heinmolenaar6750 The New Testament is man made inspired by Jesus. The Old Testament is man made inspired by God. Hope that clears up the confusion....
Christianity as sutch , is mixed with Baàl (Nimrod who was incarnated by Satan ) , birthday is 25 Desember , easter rabbits and eggs , is the firtillaty god where they slept together , and 9 month's later these baby's were on the Baàl altaar. Al these "Christain hollydays are Baàl hulliday's. Jew's pray to Satan , there father ( John 8: 44) and the Jew started every Christain religion and walked away with the money. Catholic chuch treasurekeeper is Rotschild of London.
@@thedowagerd.2431 Your totally right. This is why Putin said he doesn't want Russia infected by western disease. Only Public figure not afraid to respect Christ in Public. West is EVIL.. Disney is Evil as well. America the Evil.
you can be proud of that, but not the roman catholic church. it has too many man-made doctrines and practices which defy the word of God, such as mariology.
The bible says, "pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall." So, which comes first, religion, which can't save you, or the son of the living God?
“The authors never claimed to know the life of the Messiah“ Really? 1 John 1 That which was from the beginning, that which we have heard, that which we have seen with our eyes, that which we have gazed upon, and our hands have handled, concerning the Word of life-- You do realize the man writing this letter is John himself. You know, the Apostle John… Saint John? The same John who walked and talked with Jesus for three years? Fake news. If you’re this far off base at 3 minutes in, there’s no reason to watch the rest.
Biblical scholars widely agree that there is no evidence that the Apostle John actually wrote the Gospel of John. It was attributed to him long after it was written.
Where do you get the idea that the 12 were Jewish and the 70(72) were gentiles? The only lists of the 70(72) that I can find with a quick Google search list both Jewish and Gentile names among the 70(72). I would be ever so grateful if you could cite your source for that claim so that I can look into it.
I think you mean Ignatius of Antioch when referring to his letter of 108. It looks like you have a picture of Ignatius of Loyola who was not born until 1491.
I might disagree about that collective memory thing(exception being Luke) but 1.the gospels claim to have been an eyewitness account for the life and ministry of christ. 2.it claims to have some sort of a divine inspiration behind it.
Matthew was with Jesus, John was Jesus. Whoever wrote is knowing contradiction what was actually written in the Bible. and should have stated evidence immediately. Not blatantly lied. He is also deceived the listener. All the narrator has was site this and why. Knowingly deceiving. Came to get/find evidence of how 2nd century church leaders sold out. What real evidence pro or con , you won’t find it with fictional wishing. If you want to prove something fiction, you don’t start with fiction.
Of course, we are to understand that Jesus is like us, he understands our predicament and temptations and watches our success and failures and dis interest. And Mary His /Our mother also is watching.....O'My Jesus forgive us our sins, save us from the fires of hell, lead all souls to heaven especially those who have most need of thy Mercy.Amen.
@Pat Ludwain the year 382 AD Pope Damasus I gave the world the Bible!!! 73 books total!!! 46 books in the old testament, the one that Jesus read in the synagogues every Saturday!
I can assure you, that Peter has NOTHING to do with the Catholic Church. Peter would be the last one to worship Mary. The video is a lie bases on lies of Catholicism thrown together by satan. Catholicism was started by Ignatus who defected from The Saints in 90 A.D. because he didn’t want to share in leadership. Ignatus wanted to be The Sole Leader, so he started Catholicism and elevated the office of a bishop to head leader and self proclaimed himself to be a bishop. I am a senior citizen, we were taught this at a young age , but now lies are being mingled in by satan to hide the truth of the matter. As a matter of fact we were taught in school and college at that time that the world’s three major religions were Catholics , Christians , and Jews. This was before Muslims had a explosive growth. The Catholics just started to call themselves Christians about maybe 20 years ago or so Catholics do not follow the same doctrine as Christians. Catholics esteem Mary as the Highest and that’s who they pray to. Christians KNOW CHRIST as The Highest and that’s who we pray to. Catholics think salvation is through the works. Christians know salvation is to be BORN AGAIN of water and of The Spirit, like Jesus Christ said in John 3:5. Catholics believe in baptizing babies. Christians know that Jesus said Children are already the Greatest in The Kingdom of GOD
I find it odd that this "history" of how Catholicism started doesn't even explain why the word was even used. Catholic comes from the Greek meaning "universal" and "of the whole"; The term was used to differentiate the Church from any of a number of heresies which propped up in the first few centuries. Catholics were not Gnostics, Arians, nor Donatists etc...
The book of Luke is written using only eye witness testimony. I find that just amazing. Thank God for the cross, the blood & Jesus Christ. Without Him all is lost.
Born again, or to experience the new birth, is a phrase, particularly in evangelicalism, that refers to a "spiritual rebirth", or a regeneration of the human spirit. In contrast to one's physical birth, being "born again" is distinctly and separately caused by the operation of the Holy Spirit. John 3:3
@@dan_m7774 The point, one can't see the kingdom of God, much less, enter into it. John 3:3 is something He does, and it's not accomplished by man, human effort. Nicodemus thought it was re-entering the womb. He had a carnal understanding on the nature of the kingdom. It doesn't come with observation. And, no one's soul salvation hinges on a piece of real estate on a piece of dirt in the middle east. 2 Corinthians 5:16; John 4:21
@@georgebentonjr3876 Baptism is a grace from God, through Spirit and Water. The heavenly reality came into flesh through Christ. It seems you have a misunderstanding that the material world can not be of God. Baptism of Water and Spirit does save you, because God is not limited only to the invisible.
@@dan_m7774 ""Baptism is a grace from God, through Spirit and Water. The heavenly reality came into flesh through Christ. It seems you have a misunderstanding that the material world can not be of God. Baptism of Water and Spirit does save you, because God is not limited only to the invisible."" end quote. One of the reasons that Christ was a stone of stumbling and a rock of offense was because He was proclaiming a spiritual kingdom: My kingdom is not of this world - John 18:36; the kingdom of God is within you - Luke 17:20-21. Clearly, the majority of the Jews missed their Messiah because they were looking for a physical kingdom. The disciples too, were looking for a physical kingdom, prior to Pentecost, they held that expectation and view. After Pentecost, when they received the Holy Spirit, Who led them "into all truth" and taught them of the "things to come," their understanding of the nature of the kingdom was enlightened, and they no longer taught of a physical kingdom. Rather, they applied spiritual interpretations to Old Testament prophecies, used them to describe the Church, and associated the kingdom with the gospel. The veil of Moses had been removed.
It’s hard to by the claim that the Evangelists did not mean to provide a biographical account of Jesus’ life as they followed characteristics of biography of their time. So if their writings followed this model it would follow they meant the Gospels as biographies which were historical albeit from different perspectives meant for different audiences.
@@haroldkmayes3591 Not to mention that is stated in the Bible that no one can pay for the sins of others. Christianity is a bunch of nonsense created by Roman Empire.
@@zedwart8534 You're not wrong. But you're also no entirely correct either. True Christianity is about understanding that the antagonist is the self proclaimed God of the Old Testament. This has been hidden by both the Catholic faith and the Jews. Yahweh is, quite literally, Satan. Any child can make this connection and see the glaringly obvious contradiction between Yahweh and Yeshua when reading the bible for themselves. One commits infanticide, the other states that hurting children is wrong... One reveals himself to Moses and speaks to him face to face, the other states very clearly that God has never been seen by any man. There is a reason why Jesus calls Satan "The Father of Lies", he's been lying to the Jews for thousands of years...
@@haroldkmayes3591 Understanding sacrifice in the vein of gift with respect to the idea of covenant is the key to understanding Christian beliefs. I have no doubt you have no intention of properly doing so, but this was more for anyone that may read your comment.
@@zedwart8534 God is Love, and with Love all things are possible! Trying to disprove this is like trying to prove you are not alive, Which I very much hope you don't! Facing the fire or the jump from the Twin Towers I'm pretty sure I would have jumped, but you don't know until you have to choose. I hope you choose life, by far the best option! 🙂
You look like brainwashed and blinded by faith. It's litterally created from the fabric of nothing, just like things on technology. It's literally nothing, yet you all follow blind and if you can convince yourself well it must be true right. Ahaha society is so done for. The end needs to come already.
@@chrislachat459of course because the Old Testament existed before the New Testament. What was Rome's connection to the New Testament that you mentioned it like it was the creation of Rome? Read your history!!
@catholic defence and truth seekers *You keep L. 1. Exact Word Criterion is Not a proof for doctrines. The word trinity is not in the Bible but the doctrine is. Similarly Faith Alone which means Salvation Not By Works. 2. Old Catholic Bibles do show Sola Fede/Faith Alone. You were refuted right from beginning yet you kept L for 5 days.* “ Catholic translators before the time of Luther had given the same translation. So in the Nuremberg Bible, 1483, "Nur durch den glauben." And the Italian Bibles of Geneva, 1476, and of Venice, 1538, per sola fede. The Fathers also often use the expression, "man is justified by faith alone;" Swan, James. "Luther Added The Word "Alone" to Romans 3:28?". February 05, 2006. Retrieved 29 March 2014. Hodge, Charles, Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans (New Edition), 1864, p100 Even some Catholic versions of the New Testament also translated Romans 3:28 as did Luther. The Nuremberg Bible (1483), “allein durch den glauben” and the Italian Bibles of Geneva (1476) and of Venice (1538) say “per sola fede.” Others previous to Luther may have differed in theological interpretation, yet saw the thrust of the words implied “alone.” The Romanists, indeed, made a great outcry against that version as a gross perversion of Scripture, although Catholic translators before the time of Luther had given the same translation. So in the Nuremberg Bible, 1483, "Nur durch den glauben." And the Italian Bibles of Geneva, 1476, and of Venice, 1538, per sola fede. The Fathers also often use the expression, "man is justified by faith alone;" so that Erasmus, De Ratione Concionandi, Lib. III., says, "Vox sola, tot clamoribus lapidata hoc saeculo in Luthero, reverenter in Patribus auditur." See Koppe and Tholuck on this verse. you said almost 5 days now and not one single verse on faith alone
The Encyclopedia of Religion admits: “Theologians today are in agreement that the Hebrew Bible does not contain a doctrine of the Trinity.” And the New Catholic Encyclopedia also says: “The doctrine of the Holy Trinity is not taught in the O[ld] T[estament].”
8:48 The Creed can be traced back to within 20 years of Jesus death. Paul's epistle to the Corinthians expresses the Creed and its relation to the "Church of God" . In the epistles Paul speaks in further depth about the organization of the Church and speaks highly of the Church.
Paul speaks highly of the church known as The Way, later known as Christians in Antioch. This is in stark contrast to the counterfeit church/state hybrid known as the papacy, which bears little resemblance to the pure, non-politically involved, popeless church of apostolic times, which did not go about killing "hetetics" in the holocaust known as the Catholic inquisitions.
Very nice video! Thank you for putting together all the interesting facts. Just one thing I noticed that is not accurate. At minute marker 7:06 the narrator says that Saint Ignatius used the word, "catholic" in a letter he wrote in the year 108. The image shows Ignatius of Loyola, who was born in 1491 and died in 1556. There was a previous Saint Ignatius (of Antioch) also known as Saint Ignatius Theophorus. This one is known for his letters. The dates of his birth and death are uncertain (as well as most of his letters), but it is likely that the reference in the video corresponds to this one (Saint Ignatius of Antioch) , rather than the one depicted (Saint Ignatius of Loyola), who founded the Jesuits in 1540.
In response to the goodness of the Reformation, Loyola was commissioned to found the jez-ewe-it order, whose sole mission was to suppress the truth of the reformers, who had positively identified the popes as the biblical antichrist power. This order was to use any means, including mass murder, just like the inquisitions, to accomplish this task. They are one of the most despicable groups to curse the face of the earth, so dastardly that Jefferson and Lincoln warned us about them, and even several popes outlawed them THAT'S pretty bad.
quote--- At minute marker 7:06 the narrator says that Saint Ignatius used the word, "catholic" in a letter he wrote in the year 108. The image shows Ignatius of Loyola, who was born in 1491 and died in 1556. There was a previous Saint Ignatius (of Antioch) also known as Saint Ignatius Theophorus. This one is known for his letters. The dates of his birth and death are uncertain (as well as most of his letters), but it is likely that the reference in the video corresponds to this one (Saint Ignatius of Antioch) , rather than the one depicted (Saint Ignatius of Loyola), who founded the Jesuits in 1540.--unquote -----quote--- There was a previous Saint Ignatius (of Antioch) also known as Saint Ignatius Theophorus.--unquote ------St. Ignatius of Antioch, also called Ignatius Theophoros (Greek: “God Bearer”), (died c. 110, Rome; Western feast day October 17; Eastern feast day December 20), bishop of Antioch, Syria (now in Turkey), known mainly from seven highly regarded letters that he wrote during a trip to Rome, as a prisoner condemned to be executed for his beliefs. He was apparently eager to counteract the teachings of two groups-the Judaizers, who did not accept the authority of the New Testament, and the docetists, who held that Christ’s sufferings and death were apparent but not real. The letters have often been cited as a source of knowledge of the Christian church at the beginning of the 2nd century. -----
@@mitchellosmer1293 The first Ignatius sounds MUCH more sincere than Loyola, who founded the abominable jesuit order. Ignatius of Antioch was probably a sincere Christian, and not corrupted by the papacy, since Roman Catholicism did not begin until Constantine legislated it as the official state religion in AD 313. This is in contrast to the Romanist fable that the popes and the Catholic Church started with Peter.
@@TIJoe-te9qu You are deceived by the false teachers, confusing the word legislated with 'founded'. Constantine legislated the church, meaning he legalized it. Jesus founded it. By the way which sect or denomination you belong to?
@Andrew Patton *R Catholics love tales. Nowhere in the Bible says R Church = Christ's CHurch or the Universal Church or the bride of Christ. Neither does Bible mention the office of bishop of bishops - pope.* you said 1 Corinthians 1 C dividing the Church as D - M the Body of Christ. Whoever separates himself from the Pope and the Church separates himself from Christ. Christ is not a polygamist; He has no bride except the Catholic Church.
Following the suppression of the Bar Kokhba revolt, Jerusalem was rebuilt as a Roman colony under the name of Aelia Capitolina, and the province of Judea was renamed Syria Palaestina, before that it was the land of Israel.
This is exactly why people these days are brazen about starting “religious” organizations. They know eventually it will be accepted. The longer the organization lives, the more obscure it becomes to its future followers and it becomes open to “review”, the unpleasant aspects are rooted out and redacted to bring about a “good” religion. I bet when it was just a sect of Judaism, Christian followers were seen as weird and cult like. But look at it now.
The pagans called them "Christians" then as a pejorative expression of ridicule and mockery. Today the world still does not understand, and who cares, faith comes only from God alone, throught his Church!!!
77, educated in the Roman Catholic Church by Jesuits, Ursuline nuns, taught the "early church" began the establishment process when Jesus Christ pronounced Peter, the "Rock of the Faith" establishing him as its first head, during the latter part of his 3 year ministry.
As Catholics living in Turkey, we would love to see Turkish subtitles on your videos. There is no youtube channel where we can watch in our language. Therefore, this action you will take will help us a lot.
Proud to worship Nimrod, Isjtar and Tammuz? Sun worship??? With the Vatican build on pagan grounds, bendes crosses with Yesuah on it, thats not idolotry???....please learn symbolism. Worshipping Maria at shrines. Pilgrimages, praying beeds, do u need to go on???
@@sean6003 if they start about Trinity of "Jesus is God"........ask them one thing and one thing only....."how many Thrones are there in heaven according to the Bible?"...then Muslims should stop talking. They never answer
@@sean6003 Catholicism and Islam are two sides of the same coin. Watch Walter veith. Although he is creationist, he has a lot of proof by reliable sources. He even gives all sources. I thought the seminar was called total unslaught l- the Islamic connection. Yesuah was like God on earth because he had lived a sinless life. God is also a title given to judges in those regions. Funny thing is that islam uses Catholic teachings to debunk christianity and reinforce their own religion. While Catholicism is nothing else then the ancient secret religion of Babylon.
Good idea to find a church congregation minister/pastor teachs from the Bible with the purpose of understanding God's word. It is good for believers to gather together in Jesuse's name.
"To appeal to the non-Jews, Paul stripped the gospels of all Jewish characteristics." Where is that written? When did Paul ever write his gospel account of Jesus' life? We don't have any such record.
I would suggest reading the book , " Pagan Christianity " by Frank Viola! He has done an in depth study of Roman Catholicism and its influence on the Protestants!
Yes, especially since Constantine changed Christianity into the official state religion called Catholicism in 313, and passed the first mandatory Sunday observance laws in 321, contrary to the 7th day Sabbath observed by Jesus, Paul, the rest of the apostles, the Gentiles, and of course the Jews as well.
@deanashcraft1631 Yes, but here's the thing about the bible, though.... it's all made up. There's no reason to believe that it's God's word, and if you read it objectively then it's easy to see how there's no possibility way a perfect, all knowing all loving God had anything to do with it.
The changes to Christianity after the apostolic period are illustrated graphically in Revelation 13 and 17, Daniel 7.24,25, and 2 thess 2. These all predicted the uprising of the little horn, beast, man of sin, son of perdition, that wicked, beast, antichrist, and great whore of Babylon. Sadly, all these pointed to what we know today as the PAPACY, the apostate power of all time.
@@jeffdoyle1227 You're entitled to your (misinformed) opinion, but there's every reason for countless millions to disagree with you. Like many opinions in comment sections, you have stated your opinion as ironclad fact, but backed it with nothing.
Paul wrote his (verified) letters many years before the first of the Gospels - so to say he "Stripped the Gospels of their Jewish roots" is anachronistic. ALSO, Paul was and remained, till his death, a Jew and, at least some scholars, use that as a lens to explore his writings.
If Paul was always a Jew, then Catholic's who leave the Catholic church are always Catholic's. Which is true anyway because the Catholic Baptism leaves a indelible mark, which cannot be changed or erased. So if the Catholic leaves the Catholic church his Baptism remains intact. He does not lose his Catholic Baptism if Rebaptised he still retains his original Baptism. So Catholic's who leave the Catholic church will be purged of their dislike and disbelief, and some may be in Purgatory until the End of Time.
Paul may have functioned like St John the Baptist getting the gentiles prepared to know Jesus and repent. He claims only to have baptized Onesemose ( who later became a bishop). He admonishes about not receiving the Body and Blood of Jesus without acknowledging the fact, but he may not have been part of the priesthood to change the bread and wine into Christ's True Presence.
The Concrete Confessional blog, whose author was raised Roman Catholic, just dropped an article called "Why This Atheist Is Headed Back to Church." Very interesting reading no matter which side of the fence you're on.
Ancient people living under Kings, Dictators used them as a template for God - hence all the - Get down on our knees, beg, grovel, blindly obey, sing only his praises etc Simple primitive people with little knowledge of the world envisioned an afterlife that was similar to the real world that they lived in - a King like God sitting on his throne in the Heavens, Heaven is his kingdom and only those who believe and support the "Dear Loving Master" are allowed in. The rest left to suffer In today's world that would be like living in Russia or North Korea The top Gods in the 21st century are Putin, Kim Jong Un! This "Atheist" is a fool reduced down to praying to a Putin!
Question: "Are Catholic beliefs and practices biblical?" Answer: The issue concerning any church and its practices should be "Is this Biblical?" If a teaching is Biblical (taken in context), it should be embraced. If it is not, it should be rejected. God is more interested in whether a church is doing His will and obeying His Word than whether it can trace a line of succession back to Jesus' apostles. Jesus was very concerned about abandoning the Word of God to follow the traditions of men (Mark 7:7). Traditions are not inherently invalid-there are some good and valuable traditions. Again, the issue must be whether a doctrine, practice, or tradition is Biblical. How then does the Roman Catholic Church compare with the teachings of the Word of God? Salvation: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that salvation is by baptismal regeneration and is maintained through the Catholic sacraments unless a willful act of sin is committed that breaks the state of sanctifying grace. The Bible teaches that we are saved by grace which is received through simple faith (Ephesians 2:8-9), and that good works are the result of a change of the heart wrought in salvation (Ephesians 2:10; 2 Corinthians 5:17) and the fruit of that new life in Christ (John 15). Assurance of salvation: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that salvation cannot be guaranteed or assured. 1 John 5:13 states that the letter of 1 John was written for the purpose of assuring believers of the CERTAINTY of their salvation. Good Works: The Roman Catholic Church states that Christians are saved by meritorious works (beginning with baptism) and that salvation is maintained by good works (receiving the sacraments, confession of sin to a priest, etc.) The Bible states that Christians are saved by grace through faith, totally apart from works (Titus 3:5; Ephesians 2:8-9; Galatians 3:10-11; Romans 3:19-24). Baptism: In the New Testament baptism is ALWAYS practiced AFTER saving faith in Christ. Baptism is not the means of salvation; it is faith in the Gospel that saves (1 Corinthians 1:14-18; Romans 10:13-17). The Roman Catholic Church teaches baptismal regeneration of infants, a practice never found in Scripture. The only possible hint of infant baptism in the Bible that the Roman Catholic Church can point to is that the whole household of the Philippian jailer was baptized in Acts 16:33. However, the context nowhere mentions infants. Acts 16:31 declares that salvation is by faith. Paul spoke to all of the household in verse 32, and the whole household believed (verse 34). This passage only supports the baptism of those who have already believed, not of infants. Prayer: The Roman Catholic Church teaches Catholics to not only pray to God, but also to petition Mary and the saints for their prayers. Contrary to this, we are taught in Scripture to only pray to God (Matthew 6:9; Luke 18:1-7). Priesthood: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that there is a distinction between the clergy and the "lay people," whereas the New Testament teaches the priesthood of all believers (1 Peter 2:9). Sacraments: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that a believer is infused with grace upon reception of the sacraments. Such teaching is nowhere found in Scripture. Confession: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that unless a believer is hindered, the only way to receive the forgiveness of sins is by confessing them to a priest. Contrary to this, Scripture teaches that confession of sins is to be made to God (1 John 1:9). Mary: The Roman Catholic Church teaches, among other things, that Mary is the Queen of Heaven, a perpetual virgin, and the co-redemptress who ascended into heaven. In Scripture, she is portrayed as an obedient, believing servant of God, who became the mother of Jesus. None of the other attributes mentioned by the Roman Catholic Church have any basis in the Bible. The idea of Mary being the co-redemptress and another mediator between God and man is not only extra-biblical (found only outside of Scripture), but is also unbiblical (contrary to Scripture). Acts 4:12 declares that Jesus is the only redeemer. 1 Timothy 2:5 proclaims that Jesus is the only mediator between God and men. Many other examples could be given. These issues alone clearly identify the Catholic Church as being unbiblical. Every Christian denomination has traditions and practices that are not explicitly based on Scripture. That is why Scripture must be the standard of Christian faith and practice. The Word of God is always true and reliable. The same cannot be said of church tradition. Our guideline is to be: "What does Scripture say?" (Romans 4:3; Galatians 4:30; Acts 17:11). 2 Timothy 3:16-17 declares, "All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting, and training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work."
@Stephan Terblanche *Too bad. You dont even read the Bible. Romans 14 Col 2 does mention believers having disputes on doctrines. They did not believe in exactly the same things. You are wrong once again.* *After the Apostles, churches went independent. They had their own local councils, their own leaders, their own local canons. You see? You do not know anything.* you said The churches referred to in the Bible believed the same things. They were not independent denominations that refused to have anything to do with each other. D
Christianity is the fulfillment of Judaism. Has nothing whatsoever to do with Romes Catholic Church. It is Christ Himself that builds His body the church.
There are plenty of early Christian writings that were not canonized from the first and second century that show the traditions existed long before Constantine. These writings supplement the canonized writings that became the New Testament, but were not seen as inspired writing until the second century. Book of Acts lays out the formation of the church and it was written long before Constantine.
To be fair the entire religion is shaped around what they chose to believe is canon so really between all denominations everyone just picks and chooses their interpretation. The books have no real sources and they have been modified more times than anyone could actually know so how important are the rules really? I think it is easy to know right from wrong and any good god would be more worried about how you treat each other than the semantics games humans played with doctrine they wrote for said god.
@@0bservationis1 the early Christian writings they identified were the most likely true sources from the disciples for the gospels based on texts that were known to be produced by the apostle or one of their direct disciples (each author had a known style). Even though they identified them as inspired writings in the second century they spread throughout the known world with different scribes copying the manuscripts they had at their disposal. The church realized that there was changes being made to some of the manuscripts that were not in other versions. So they realized they had an issue. By the fourth century they collected a copy of the manuscripts from all areas and began to compare all the inspired Christian writing we know of as the New Testament. Through comparing thousands of scribed versions they were able to see how the text was changed in one region that didn’t match what other regions had. By analyzing each of the variations they were able to construct the canon by rooting out the variances. This became cannon and the texts are stored in Latin. An unchanging version of language. The oldest manuscripts they have are preserved and the fragments are compared to modern interpretations. Even the Dead Sea scrolls when they were recovered were compared with the cannon to see if they matched and they do. What is left now with updating of the language to reflect modern language variations to make them easier to read. These are always compared to the original text to ensure accuracy.
“The way” or what was known simply as the church practiced what is described in the Bible. Breaking bread, fellowship, worship, praying, teachings or sermons(reading of scripts), fasting. After Christ gnostics and others perverted the words and fables of apocryphal nonsense. The canonized books were carefully chosen by what was taught and considered true, god inspired for the years that followed the Christ. Ignatius spoke of the Catholic Church as an adjective not a noun or church religion. Constantine a high pagan priest added to the teachings to form the RCC. Mixed paganism with Christianity to appease the pagans and have them convert comfortably. Catholicism has added traditions, rituals, practices and other unbiblical teachings making it not Christianity anymore. The first church in Jerusalem is nothing, night and day of what the RCC church is.
@@Everykneebows this is ignorance of what the early Christian’s wrote. The church fathers writings up to 4th century do follow Universal church traditions. From the lords day to confession to baptism to alms giving to anointing the sick to apostolic succession to the pope. What is a twisted version is protestantism who have zero history and makes up their own non-biblical traditions that are not supported by what the church fathers practiced
Correct, and Acts sure doesn't include any popes, Mary worship, purgatory, indulgences, praying to dead saints, relics, pilgrimages, priests, confession boxes to drunken priests who may be molesters, Sunday sacredness., etc, etc. Good old Constantine sure put his pagan spin on things.
Catholicism has not showed us to be a christ like institution . How many crusades , wars , corruption, and executions of people in the name of the church has happened throughout in history . How about all the fraud The priest and popes have done .
2:54 gives the order of the Gospels as Mark, Matthew, Luke, and John. A modern theory, but the traditional order has good historical testimony, as early as Irenaeus of Lyon, a student of Polycarp of Smyrna, who was a student of the Apostle John. Can you imagine the grandchildren of soldiers of the American Revolution not knowing who wrote the Declaration of Independence or that it came before The Constitution? That is about the time gap here three generations.
Well what do you think accounts for the difference? I assume it’s modern people looking at which book appears to come from which, like Luke and Matthew appear to come from Mark and Q, for example. I assume they’re using the Greek texts? I dunno what they’re looking for specifically.
@@llla_german_ewoklll6413 You seem to be saying what I'm saying in your first sentence. Your 2nd sentence seems to disagree but I don't see your point. On your 3rd sentence, The gap I speak of is 3 generations and I list the 3 generations I am talking about.
@@glstka5710 Looking back at your comment, I misread it. I apologize for the misunderstanding. But I will say that is only a two generational gap. If we speak of Irenaeus, he is two places removed from John. If there was one more before Irenaeus, and after Polycarp or John, then it would be a 3 generation gap.
I am a Catholic only, my biggest wish is for world peace, no war, no Fighting,Ask Jesus to bless mankind around the world, be safe and happy, Amen. ⛪💐🧡
Question: "Are Catholic beliefs and practices biblical?" Answer: The issue concerning any church and its practices should be "Is this Biblical?" If a teaching is Biblical (taken in context), it should be embraced. If it is not, it should be rejected. God is more interested in whether a church is doing His will and obeying His Word than whether it can trace a line of succession back to Jesus' apostles. Jesus was very concerned about abandoning the Word of God to follow the traditions of men (Mark 7:7). Traditions are not inherently invalid-there are some good and valuable traditions. Again, the issue must be whether a doctrine, practice, or tradition is Biblical. How then does the Roman Catholic Church compare with the teachings of the Word of God? Salvation: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that salvation is by baptismal regeneration and is maintained through the Catholic sacraments unless a willful act of sin is committed that breaks the state of sanctifying grace. The Bible teaches that we are saved by grace which is received through simple faith (Ephesians 2:8-9), and that good works are the result of a change of the heart wrought in salvation (Ephesians 2:10; 2 Corinthians 5:17) and the fruit of that new life in Christ (John 15). Assurance of salvation: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that salvation cannot be guaranteed or assured. 1 John 5:13 states that the letter of 1 John was written for the purpose of assuring believers of the CERTAINTY of their salvation. Good Works: The Roman Catholic Church states that Christians are saved by meritorious works (beginning with baptism) and that salvation is maintained by good works (receiving the sacraments, confession of sin to a priest, etc.) The Bible states that Christians are saved by grace through faith, totally apart from works (Titus 3:5; Ephesians 2:8-9; Galatians 3:10-11; Romans 3:19-24). Baptism: In the New Testament baptism is ALWAYS practiced AFTER saving faith in Christ. Baptism is not the means of salvation; it is faith in the Gospel that saves (1 Corinthians 1:14-18; Romans 10:13-17). The Roman Catholic Church teaches baptismal regeneration of infants, a practice never found in Scripture. The only possible hint of infant baptism in the Bible that the Roman Catholic Church can point to is that the whole household of the Philippian jailer was baptized in Acts 16:33. However, the context nowhere mentions infants. Acts 16:31 declares that salvation is by faith. Paul spoke to all of the household in verse 32, and the whole household believed (verse 34). This passage only supports the baptism of those who have already believed, not of infants. Prayer: The Roman Catholic Church teaches Catholics to not only pray to God, but also to petition Mary and the saints for their prayers. Contrary to this, we are taught in Scripture to only pray to God (Matthew 6:9; Luke 18:1-7). Priesthood: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that there is a distinction between the clergy and the "lay people," whereas the New Testament teaches the priesthood of all believers (1 Peter 2:9). Sacraments: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that a believer is infused with grace upon reception of the sacraments. Such teaching is nowhere found in Scripture. Confession: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that unless a believer is hindered, the only way to receive the forgiveness of sins is by confessing them to a priest. Contrary to this, Scripture teaches that confession of sins is to be made to God (1 John 1:9). Mary: The Roman Catholic Church teaches, among other things, that Mary is the Queen of Heaven, a perpetual virgin, and the co-redemptress who ascended into heaven. In Scripture, she is portrayed as an obedient, believing servant of God, who became the mother of Jesus. None of the other attributes mentioned by the Roman Catholic Church have any basis in the Bible. The idea of Mary being the co-redemptress and another mediator between God and man is not only extra-biblical (found only outside of Scripture), but is also unbiblical (contrary to Scripture). Acts 4:12 declares that Jesus is the only redeemer. 1 Timothy 2:5 proclaims that Jesus is the only mediator between God and men. Many other examples could be given. These issues alone clearly identify the Catholic Church as being unbiblical. Every Christian denomination has traditions and practices that are not explicitly based on Scripture. That is why Scripture must be the standard of Christian faith and practice. The Word of God is always true and reliable. The same cannot be said of church tradition. Our guideline is to be: "What does Scripture say?" (Romans 4:3; Galatians 4:30; Acts 17:11). 2 Timothy 3:16-17 declares, "All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting, and training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work."
I find it interesting that for so many the bible is a fact. I feel like the true power of the book is lost when is used as a fact filled book instead of a way of teaching philosophy to the lower classes.
The Bible is a literary work that was translated by Martin Luther into a literal work in Latin. Previously, St Jerome also added his own agenda against women,such as, the Immaculate Conception bit., and womens removal from the priesthood into subservience.
No offense i think you miss the point that jesus teachings and his apostels teachings got compromised by romans and not just any the same one that had authority in that time period and also was persecuting jesus at that time. They even made a counsel to establish the trinity 300 years after jesus so if no previous prophet preached the trinity and jesus nor his disciples did it and the catholic church that has ties to roman pagions declared what the word of gods is then our salvation is based on flaws
@@paulruswalrus ok I will do it but how do we as Christian’s and none Christian’s know that the KJV is the word of jesus or given jesus stamps and approval why do humans that are living after Jesus just need to believe that he died of our sins to find salvation and the ppl of the Old Testament needed to follow 10 commandments there is two explanations here one is that god was unfair to the ppl that lived before Jesus and made it easy for us living after Jesus the second is the right answer because god is consistent perfect and justly ppl changed Jesus message why to make life easy for them who change the not every Christian they lived but the ones with power you look into video you will see that they Christians in power where not god fearing men they compromised the religion to benefit them so they could maintain power they had
@@subeerbarkhdle2341 We have thousands of Greek manuscripts that date before the Council of Nicaea. That is how we know that the word was not altered. Modern translation are reliable Bc they are based off of the earliest manuscripts, and like I said, there are thousands that have survived. Also, the council of Nicaea was to discuss the deity of Christ. A vast majority of the Churches already viewed Him as eternal and so did the Church Fathers before them. These men were not looking for power. It was noted by one man at the council of Nicaea that it looked like an army of martyrs had been gathered together. Most of these men had survived the persecution of the previous Roman leaders and many were missing limbs or wounded from torture. They did not care what the Emperor thought. They were all willing to die for the truth. I believe the one that started the idea that Jesus was not eternal was a man from Alexandria.
I’m going through chemo for breast cancer now. The thinning has just started and it was a huge fear for me. I’ve come to terms with it and can’t wait to see my oncologist and wear my “My oncologist does my hair” t shirt to that appointment. 😂
I had cancer in my neck twice. They had to cut the main facial nerve to take the tumour out so half my face is paralyzed and my vision is affected, but 25 years later, I’m still here. I hope you will be too.
It’s a deeply painful and complex issue. Many people feel that the actions of individuals should not define the entire institution, especially when those actions are so contrary to its teachings. It’s understandable to feel that these abuses are damaging the church from within.
The carpenter from Galilee would be disgusted to see what has been done in his friends name in Rome. Peter would also be disgusted to see marble and gold everywhere. It's like a false kingdom more suited to the devil.
I know it is hard brother, to see money used and not spent on what we deem more important. However, people poure dtheir lives into building these places. Jesus will know their act of faith and appericate it if it is a true act. just like He did when the women poured expensive anointed oii upon His feet, if money be spent let it be for the glory of God my King,
@@alexanodeworthy6589 You are comparing the building of a gathering place to the actions of Mary when she anointed Christ? You cannot be serious... ??
@@krisgangwer3796The commenter is making an analogy between the sinful woman of Luke’s gospel to people who build beautiful churches dedicated to Christ. Sinners who bow before Christ and express a gift. Christ did not kick the woman off of him. She was repaying him in the most appropriate way she knew how.
@@WhistleMeThis First of all, she had a name: Mary. Second of all, I am very weary of posters who try to explain things because they think women are too stupid to understand. What Mary did by anointing Jesus this way is not comparable to any cathedral the Catholics have built out of their EXCESS! Go read Matthew 23.... pray and ask for discernment regarding the RCC but I am done here. Know what the real difference is between Mary and the RCC? He told her to "Go and sin no more" and she followed him all of her days... the RCC? No, not so much.
@@krisgangwer3796 do you even know the history of how some of these buildings were built? It is comparable. Some people dedicate their lives to these places of worship just to give people a beautiful place to pray and to give God the house He deserves. They literally dedicated blood, sweat, and tears. Moreover, Mary might have sinned again and there is no proof she didn't. God's mercy is bigger than our sins. Moreover, God calls sinners so saying the RCC is full of sinners does nothing to prove it wrong. Jesus was in the company of sinners. Thus, Jesus is in the company of RCC and all Christians who call on His name. Im sorry that you dont understand the Church but you cant say you know the intent of why these churches on made. and to say they are inherently bad goes aganist there very purpose of being made. a house divide aganist itself does not stand. moreover these people didnt use the money for themsleves but wanted to give it to the community of believers and God.
Micah 6:2 shows Jesus is eternal. Has been "from of old, from everlasting" The word "everlasting" here is from the Hebrew and means "the days of eternity". Or was someone else to be born in Bethlehem to be Ruler in Israel?
Micah 6:2 New American Standard Bible "Listen, you mountains, to the indictment by the Lord, And you enduring foundations of the earth, Because the Lord has a case against His people; And He will dispute with Israel." This is God the Father speaking. It says nothing of an "Eternal Son." The term "Eternal Son" is a Greek philosophic idea invented in post-Biblical times in the 3rd through 5th centuries AD. It is not a Hebrew or a Christian Apostolic term. You cannot prove that the term "Eternal Son" existed before the Church Counsel of Nicia in 325 AD: More than 300 years after the birth of Christ. This is Platonic-Christianity to believe Jesus was eternal and that he is God. (Carefully read Luke 1:35): He was created in the womb of Mary through a biological miracle, and the verse says for this very reason (the miracle) he shall be called "The Son of God." No other reason can be supplanted or substituted for "Why" he is called the Son of God. The Apostles knew nothing of an "Eternal Son," and the Bible does not teach it. It is only the school of Plato (which lasted 900 years) and sophism which has set the Church into delusionary false doctrines! Jesus is the Son of God, not the Eternal Son!
@@davidstarr6604 Not only did God foreknow Jesus Christ before the foundation of the world, but God foreknew each of us who follow Jesus Christ: This foreknowledge of us does not make us eternal. "And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose. For those God foreknew 1, he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brothers. And those he predestined, he also called; those he called, he also justified; those he justified, he also glorified" [i.e. he gave them glory in intention, not yet in reality] (Rom. 8:28-30; cf. Eph. 1:3-10). "Praise be to the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in the heavenlies with every spiritual blessing in Christ. For he chose us in him before the creation of the world to be holy and blameless in his sight. In love, he predestined us to be adopted as his sons through Jesus Christ, in accordance with his pleasure and will - to the praise of his glorious grace, which he has freely given us in the one he loves. In him we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, in accordance with the riches of God’s grace that he lavished on us with all wisdom and understanding. And he made known to us the mystery of his will [the mystery of the Kingdom] according to his good pleasure which he purposed in Christ, to be put into effect when the times will have reached their fulfillment - to bring all things in heaven and on earth together in Christ" (Eph. 1:3-10). 1 Jesus himself was foreknown (1 Pet. 1:20). "But when the right time came, God sent his Son, born of a woman, born under the Law to ransom those who are under the Law in order that we might receive the full status of sons. To show that you are sons, God sent the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, “Abba, Father.” So you are no longer a slave, but a son; and if a son, an heir also, by God’s own act" (Gal. 4:4-7; Translator’s Translation). "God has saved us, and called us with a holy calling, not according to our works, but according to his own purpose and grace which was granted to us in Christ Jesus from all eternity, but now has been revealed by the appearing of our Savior Christ Jesus, who abolished death and brought life and immortality to light through the Gospel" (2 Tim. 1:9, 10). "In the hope of the life of the age to come which God who cannot lie promised before aionion times but at the proper time manifested, namely his word in the proclamation with which I was entrusted" (Titus 1:2, 3a). Jesus is not the Eternal Son. Being foreknown in eternity past is an issue within the mind of God. He foreknew him, just as He also foreknew us in God's mind, eons ago.
@@geraldhancock6208 That is not the same. We are human beings. Jesus is God the Son. Scripture is very clear that Jesus has always existed, and that we have eternal life in Him. Mary conceived by the Holy Spirit.
You have to look at the original language the gospels were written in. Which is in Greek. "You are Peter (petros = stone) and on this rock (petra = rock or boulder) I will build my church." Jesus is the Rock and chief corner stone.
@Andrew Patton *R Catholics love to tw Scriptures. James was addressing Jewish Christians who were already saved. He was addressing their Practical Christian Living.* *Salvation is Not By Works (Faith Alone). Christian Living is by Works (Not Faith Alone)* you said The only place in the Bible "faith alone" is written is in James, with a "not" in front of it.
@@joycegreer9391 no one can be sure of one's salvation..but in order for salvation to be at least possible one has to be within the institutional Church of the Catholic Church and be baptized within it..and then one has to live an authentic Christian life, that is the Catholic life, the only true Christian life, by reception of the Sacraments within the Church, the only avenue and conduit, through the hands of the priest, of grace..also by doing good works, fasting, penance, praying for the Holy souls within Purgatory, and gaining indulgences..even with all of this one cannot be assured of salvation, but without, we do know it is an absolute impossibly..I will pray for your soul.
@@davidniedjaco9869 Hahaha. Totally not true. RCC mythology, manmade religious system, totally unbiblical. Of course RCath can't be sure of salvation; that's the way their system was designed. All RCath is promised is purgatory. Don't know why anyone stays in that system. You do need prayers! Those of us who have total faith and trust in Jesus (sola fide) can be sure of our salvation by the promises in God's Word (sola scriptura). No RCATH will answer this question: where is your church in Revelation?
@@davidniedjaco9869 wow. Do you actually read scripture? No you do not. I can answer this question for you because of what you said. If you actually read you'd know you are bound to obey God's 10 commandments. Therefore catholism is blasphemy in its highest. It's built on the foundation of Roman paganism by adding Mary and saints. By calling a worldly man holy and father when scripture says only 1 is holy and call Noone father on earth. Your worldly priest claims to be God almighty himself and forgive sin. The vow of celibacy is not written in scripture and is contradiction TO GOD. GOD MADE WOMAN FOR MAN . GOD DIDNT MAKE WOMAN EVIL ONLY SEXUAL IMMORALITY. The way the priest holds the (round wafer) in a ancient rome and Egyptian and babylon sun worship manner. The fact you worship God on Sunday SUN-DAY WAS ROMES DAY TO WORSHIP THE SUN NOT THE SUN.. ANDIT WAS DONE TO DECIEVE US. SATURDAY WAS THE TRADITIONAL DAY. THE DAY GOD SAID TO KEEP HOLY AND LET IT BE A SIGN WE ACKNOWLEDGE HIM AS GOD CREATOR OF HEAVEN AND EARTH. you guys create false images . Idol worship. Blasphemy, pray for your own soul. Or go read 20 min of 1 gospel. Hebrews 10:26 if anyone deliberately sins after recieving the SPIRIT OF TRUTH THEY NO LONGER HAVE THE SACRIFICE FOR SIN JOHN 3:4-11 Everyone who makes a practice of sinning also practices lawlessness; sin is lawlessness. You know that he appeared to take away sins, and in him there is no sin. No one who abides in him keeps on sinning; no one who keeps on sinning has either seen him or known him. Little children, let no one deceive you. Whoever practices righteousness is righteous, as he is righteous. Whoever makes a practice of sinning is of the devil, for the devil has been sinning from the beginning. The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the works of the devil. ... John 5:18 We know that everyone who has been born of God does not keep on sinning, but he who was born of God protects him, and the evil one does not touch him Timothy 1:7 For God gave us a spirit not of fear but of power and love and (self-control.) Corinthians 5:11 But now I am writing to you not to associate with anyone who bears the name of brother if he is guilty of sexual immorality or greed, or is an idolater, reviler, drunkard, or swindler-not even to eat with such a one Acts 17:30 The times of ignorance God overlooked, but now he commands all people everywhere to repent Luke 6:46 Why do you call me ‘Lord, Lord,’ and not do what I tell you? James 3:1-18 Mathew 5:48 You therefore must be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect. John 3:3 Jesus answered him, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God.” Collossians 3:1-25If then you have been raised with Christ, seek the things that are above, where Christ is, seated at the right hand of God. Set your minds on things that are above, not on things that are on earth. For you have died, and your life is hidden with Christ in God. When Christ who is your life appears, then you also will appear with him in glory. Put to death therefore what is earthly in you: sexual immorality, impurity, passion, evil desire, and covetousness, which is idolatry. ... Hosea 4:6 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge; because you have rejected knowledge, I reject you from being a priest to me. And since you have forgotten the law of your God, I also will forget your children. Thessalonians 3:14 John 8:34 Jesus answered them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, everyone who commits sin is a slave to sin.
First The Romans loudly despised Jesus Christ in life, Crucified him in front of his friends, family, followers, and foes then Claimed that their Church's rules, teachings, text and beliefs were the only true, legitimate authority regarding Christianity. It's laughable. You literally could not have written a better parody of the scripture if you tried. How Blasphemous? Lord Strike me if I ever call any man who is not my father, "father". Forgiveness is in the scripture, yet you expect me to (repeatedly) confess my sins and ask a 40-year-old virgin for his forgiveness? PS!!! Mary... a perpetual virgn? PLEASE! Jesus had four brothers!
You begin your comment with the word "First" an stated what is true about how the Romans despised Jesus. I begin my comment with the word "Secondly" a few hundred years passed and times changed as they always do. The part about Constantine needing the Christians to prop up his government is most likely true because historians recorded it to be so. A little critical thinking could have saved you from making such a brash statement.
Comparing Roman policy under Augustus Cesar with that of Constantine is like presuming that Kennedy and Nixon are the same because they're both Americans. Administrations and administrative policy can vary wildly depending on who's in charge.
Did Roman Catholics change the Christian Creed established by the early Church? If they changed the beliefs, how can it claim to be the original belief? What does the book of Galations say about this question? What does Orthodox mean? If you study what Orthodox Christianity is, then you will discover that this video reframes reality to suit different teachings.
Interesting in a video about the beginnings of Christianity you use the phrase 'BCE'. So, what happened to change it to today's era? When did BCE stop being BCE and become something else? And what happened to cause this change?
Instead of BC (before Christ) they use BCE (which stands for before common error). The so called government does not want God in the picture. In other words, they are taking our religious freedom away.
Why does it say "3 replies" yet shows only 1? Anyway the calendar was changed into our current Gregorian calendar and is actually off by 4 years. Jesus was born in 4 BC. "BC" technically means "before Christ" and (I think) AD means "after death", not sure though cause that don't make sense either. Can anyone confirm what "AD" translates to? Evolutionists like the BCE and CE dates. "Before Common Era" and "Common Era". It leaves Christ out of the calculations of years and away from our calendars.
@@davidstarr6604 AD=Anno Domini. Medieval Latin and means 'in the year of the Lord'. I find often that all the comments don't show. Don't know what's up with that.
@Quirico mazarin *Most of Ignatius writings were forgeries. In the first place all writings including this does not say R Church = the Universal Church or the Church CHrist founded. You are misled.* *"catholic" in all writings refers to the Universal Christian Church. Not R Catholic Church. Church has always meant all churches + all believers. Nothing to do with Church of Rome (current r Catholic Church).* you said 1st post apostle historical extant writing by one of the disciples St.Ignatious of Antioch 107 A.D .
Amen. Jesus is the rock. Why will Jesus built a church based on man for Jesus knew man and did not consider their testimony. So it's affirm that Jesus is the rock.
@@johnyang1420 Peter is only the rock to Romanists, because they need to fabricate a tie to Peter being the supposed "1st pope" 😂. Otherwise, the papacy has no way to claim connection to the apostolic church. It's all a giant lie, as Jesus never appointed ANY pope to sit as God in the temple of the Vatican, claiming to be a vicarious Christ. Peter would NEVER do that.
@@nadiaestrella2153 LMFAO🤣 thank you for reading my comment here in New York City reading yours Friday September 22nd 1:16 p.m. drinking coffee and walking on 14th Street Union Square heading for the train station to disappear LOL🤣
@@timeisapathwalkingtounderstandI’m watching the video and reading you comment here in Luxembourg, Europe at 1:50am Thursday March 7th needing to get some sleep but chuckling reading your comments. Much love ❤
@Andrew Patton *Any mention of "catholic" in any writings does not refer to R Catholic Church at all. "catholic" was always applied to the Universal Christian Church. Not R Catholic Church.* *Most of Ignatius writings were spurious according to historians and scholars. You are using spurious writings as doctrines?* you said St. Ignatius of Antioch spoke of the Catholic Church in the early 2nd century.
@@tagalogstories-hs4yr *So interesting. Dont you know Irenaeus Against Heresies was another f - ry?* you said LOL...you so funny.... Not only St. Ignatius of Antioch...We even have St. Irenaeus of Lyon (180 A.D.) who believe in the CATHOLIC title and the Roman Bishop succession.... ST. IRENAEUS of LYON "The 🛑Catholic Church possesses one and the same faith throughout the whole world, as we have already said." - (ST. IRENAEUS of LYON, Against Heresies , Book 1, Chapter 10) ST. IRENAEUS of LYON "But as it would take up too much space, in such a volume as this, to enumerate the successions of all the churches, by pointing out that tradition which the 🛑greatest, and most ancient, and universally known, 🛑Church of Rome - founded and constituted by the two most glorious Apostles🛑 Peter and Paul - holds from the Apostles, and the faith announced to all men, which, through the successions of (her) bishops, has come down to us, we confound all those who in any way, whether through self-complacency or vain-glory, or blindness and evil opinion, assemble otherwise than as behooves them. For to this Church, on account of more powerful principality, it is necessary that every church, who wishes to remain faithful, resort, in which has been preserved that tradition which is from Apostles." - (ST. IRENAEUS of LYON, Against Heresies, Book 3, Chapter 3)
@@tagalogstories-hs4yr *You do not know? That's why you are D.* "Against Heresies" attributed to Irenaeus is a most blatant f -ry or false attribution. In addition, "Against Heresies" destroys the chronology of the Pauline Epistles. Irenaeus was a supposed Presbyter and Bishop of the Church of Lyons In the Church of Lyons, it was taught that Jesus was CRUCIFIED when an OLD man in the reign of Claudius or about 20 years AFTER the 15th year of Tiberius c 49 CE. The Pauline Corpus was UNKNOWN to the Church of Lyons since a Pauline writer claimed or implied he PREACHED Christ Crucified since the time of King Aretas c 37-41 CE. It is virtually impossible to TEACH in the CHURCH of Lyons that Jesus was crucified in the time of Claudius if they had knowledge and the HISTORY of Jesus and Paul. "Against Heresies" must be the work of MULTIPLE authors. The Canonised Gospels and Pauline Corpus are all LATE writings fabricated AFTER "Against Heresies" 2.22 or AFTER at least c 175-180 CE. "Against Heresies" 2.22 is a two-thousand word argument to attempt to show Jesus Christ was about 50 years old when he was crucified. "Against Heresies" 2.22 does NOT appear to be the product of "scribal error" since the author claimed John the disciple did TEACH that Jesus was about fifty years old. And NOT only that, the Gospel and ALL those conversant with John did claim that Jesus was about 50 years old when he suffered. Let me recap the claims of "Against Heresies" 2.22. at the crucifixion of Jesus 1. John the disciple PREACHED Jesus was about 50 YEARS OLD. 2. The Gospel stated Jesus was about 50 years old. 3. All those who were conversant with John did admit they were told Jesus was about 50 years old. There is one thing that NOW must be established. When was Jesus born according to "Against Heresies"? The author of 'AH' (Against Heresies") used gLuke to claim Jesus was about to be 30 years old at the Baptism. you said f??...who says it's f??....even Scholars relied on St. Irenaeus of Lyon in finding the heretical Gospel of Judas ,which was recently found by archeologists... It was first mentioned and CONDEMNED by ST. Irenaeus of Lyon and now, archeologists found the Gospel of Judas... 🙄
@@tagalogstories-hs4yr *Catholic Church contradicts Scriptures in every possible ways!* 1. Catholics say Mary was sinless. But BIBLE says Mary offered a sinner's offering. She was a sinner. Bible says Mary needed a Saviour. Lk 2:23-24, Lev 12:6-8, Rom 3:10. 2. Catholics say clergies must be celibate. Yet BIBLE says Peter (supposed R Church first leader) had mother in law. Bible says celibacy is not a qualification for clergies. Mat 8:14-15, Mar 1:30-31, Luk 4:38-39. 3. Catholics say Mary was forever virgin. Yet BIBLE says Jesus had brothers and sisters. Mary was not perpetually virgin. Mk 6:3, Mat 13:55, Mat 27:56, Mar 6:3, Mar 15:40, Mar 15:47. 4. Catholics say confess to R priests in a box. BIBLE says nothing about confessing to priests in a box. Bible says confess to GOD only. 1 John 1:9, Mat 6, Romans 10:9-10. 5. Catholics say drink of the literal blood of Jesus. Yet OT and NT both say do not drink blood. Acts 15, Lev 7:26. 6. Catholics say pray to passed on Mary and "saints". Yet BIBLE says do not contact the dead. NT Church did not record a single case of NT believers asking passed on saints to pray for them. Deut 18:11, Isaiah 8:19. 7. Catholics make and bow down to statues. BIBLE says do not bow down to graven images (statues). Deut 4, Exo 20:4-5. 8. Catholics sprinkles “holy water”. But NT Church of the Bible mentioned nothing about “holy water”. There was no record of any Apostles sprinkling “holy water” on believers. Catholics claimed “holy water” came from OT. Yet Num 5:17 says “holy water” was water used to test adulterous women in OT temple. Hardly the same. Those were for Old Covenant Jews. Not New Testament Christians. 9. Catholics say Peter was pope - bishop of all bishops. Yet BIBLE says Peter was just a leader of the Jerusalem Church. Bible says nothing of the office of bishop of bishops. Gal 2:9, Mat 16:18. 10. Catholics say there is a seat of Peter. Yet BIBLE says nothing about it. Jesus said “not to lord over others”. 11. Catholics has clergy priesthood. Bible says clergy priesthood was done away with in New Testament. There is no clergy priesthood in NT. Heb 7:27, 9:12, 10:10. 12. Catholics preaches Works Salvation (faith + good works + partake R sacraments + submit to R pontiff + be in R Church + devote to Mary = to be saved). Yet Bible says “believe in Jesus to be saved”. Bible says Works Salvation is cursed. Gal 1:8-9. Acts 16:30-31, John 3:16, Romans 10:9-10. 13. Catholics says they must do Penance to atone for their sins. Yet Bible says repent, confess and sins will be forgiven. Catholic Bible changes the word “repentance” in NT into “penance”. Original Greek NT does not use or mean the word penance. Penance = work to atone for sins. Repentance = change of heart. 1 John 1:9, Mat 6. 14. Catholics say Mary went straight to heaven without dying. Yet Bible says nothing about it. 15. Catholics say Islam and Christianity have the same GOD. Yet Islam doesn't believe in death and resurrection of Jesus and Trinity. R Catholicism is full of contradiction and anti Scriptures. Nothing is more evil than a c--- disguising as Christianity deceiving many.
@@tagalogstories-hs4yr 1. Catholics claim CHURCH refers to Roman Catholic Church. BIBLE says CHURCH refers to all churches. Acts 5:11, Acts 8:1, Mat 16:18. HISTORY tells us Roman Church was just one local Church a member of the Pentarchy. 2. Catholics claim Roman Church was the CHURCH CHRIST founded (First Church) or one true church. BIBLE says First Local Church was Jerusalem Church. Acts 2. Not Roman Catholic Church. 3. Catholics claim there is only One Church. BIBLE mentions both CHURCH and Churches. “CHURCH” refers to the Body of Christ Eph 5:30, Col 1:18 consisting of all churches. Acts 5:11, Acts 8:1 Mat 16:18. “Churches” refers to local churches Acts 9:31, Acts 15:41 and believers Romans 16:5, 1 Cor 16:19, 4. Catholics claim to be the first believers. BIBLE says first believers were Jewish Christians. Acts 2, Acts 11:26, NOT roman catholics. 5. Catholics claim Pope is the head of the CHURCH. BIBLE says JESUS is the HEAD OF THE CHURCH. Eph 1:22, Eph 5:23, Col 1:18. 6. Catholics claim outside Roman Church there is NO SALVATION. BIBLE says “apart from Jesus there is NO SALVATION”. Acts 4:12, 1 Cor 3:11. 7. Catholics claim submit to Roman Pontiff to be saved. BIBLE says “apart from Jesus there is NO SALVATION”. Acts 4:12, 1 Cor 3:11. 8. Catholics claim devote to Mary to be saved. BIBLE says “apart from Jesus there is NO SALVATION”. Acts 4:12, 1 Cor 3:11. 9. Catholics claim partake Roman Church sacraments to be saved. BIBLE says “believe in Jesus to be saved”. Acts 16:30-31, John 3:16. 10. Catholics claim Roman Church inherited infallible authority from Peter. BIBLE does not say that in Mat 16 or John 20 or John 21. 11. Catholics claim Roman pontiff inherited infallible authority from Peter. BIBLE does not say that in Mat 16. 12. Catholics claim bishop of ROME = the pope. BIBLE does not say that. 13. Catholics claim there is an office of bishop of bishops/universal bishop/pope. BIBLE does not speak of such an office. History tells us the first bishop of bishops came in AD590-600s. 14. Roman Church has all the false unbiblical clergies - Roman priests, roman cardinals, roman pontiff, monks, nuns, friars, … BIBLE mentions only pastors, teachers, evangelists, prophets, apostles, deacons, bishop, elders. Titus 1:5, Eph 4:11, 1 Tim 3. 15. Roman Church claim its doctrines come from traditions of Apostles. BUT 95% of roman doctrines are Not from traditions of Jesus or Apostles or Scriptures; neither practised by nt Church of the Bible.
According to Eusebius (father of church history) standing up at the council, he proclaimed that the gospels came from the writings if the Essenes. Wether rightly or wrongly, IDNK
They went out from us, *but they were not of us* for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us. {1 John 2:19} The church *that is at Babylon* elected together with you, saluteth you; and so doth Marcus my son. {1 Peter 5:13}
According to Edward Gibbons, The Rise and Fall of The Roman Empire, after Constantine had his Vision of The Cross which inspired his army to victory, and he won the civil war and became emperor, he decreed that Christianity be legalized. But the old Roman ways were still common, and the magistrates were powerful: they were keepers of the temples, which had been temples to the gods, Jupiter and Mars and all those guys,. Magistrates (magi = wise, powerful) were municipal officers, performed weddings, funerals, all that AND executed contracts - and collected taxes and were allowed to keep a commission, so it was a lucrative position. Under Roman law, church and state were united. The Emperor was Pontificus Maximus", Head Dude, and his word was "divined" as inspired by the gods, and therefore became law. (USA = separation of church and state) After Constantine legalized the church, the magistrates all became Catholic bishops! so they could control the temple, and all the Roman temples, throughout the vast empire, became roman catholic churches. But they required new robes. And the Pope, The Pontiff, wears a pointy hat. That's how. Whereas Caesar ruled by power of fear, Jesus Christ rules by power of love. "Render unto Caesar that which is Caesars and render unto God that which is God's".
The line about give unto Cesar what is his was infused so as not to upset the ruling powers to try and squash the religion. The actual writers of the gospels (they were not Matthew mark Luke or John) were extremely intelligent in their word choices to write a religion that could get the most people and try to stay out of persecution - at least until they had enough followers and power and then didn’t some real trash things like torturing “witches” or the crusades where they would kill people simply for not believing
Edward gibbons wrote more then 200 years ago. Almost everything he wrote on this subject has been debunked by modern science. He is not a credible source
@@thisstupid757 justified in the sense of the word you're using for made Just, no. I only meant there are more complex and nuanced pressures and pulls and relationships going on between several different cultures, rulers, and incentives. Not "simply" anything
I would love to see the sources you interpret as the Catholic Church being started in the 4th century. Is it your assumption that the Church didn't exist before the Council of Nicea? What makes you think that?
The Catholic Church was started by Christ when He called together the Twelve Apostles - and when Judas committed suicide - the Apostles elected Mathias.
Question: "Are Catholic beliefs and practices biblical?" Answer: The issue concerning any church and its practices should be "Is this Biblical?" If a teaching is Biblical (taken in context), it should be embraced. If it is not, it should be rejected. God is more interested in whether a church is doing His will and obeying His Word than whether it can trace a line of succession back to Jesus' apostles. Jesus was very concerned about abandoning the Word of God to follow the traditions of men (Mark 7:7). Traditions are not inherently invalid-there are some good and valuable traditions. Again, the issue must be whether a doctrine, practice, or tradition is Biblical. How then does the Roman Catholic Church compare with the teachings of the Word of God? Salvation: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that salvation is by baptismal regeneration and is maintained through the Catholic sacraments unless a willful act of sin is committed that breaks the state of sanctifying grace. The Bible teaches that we are saved by grace which is received through simple faith (Ephesians 2:8-9), and that good works are the result of a change of the heart wrought in salvation (Ephesians 2:10; 2 Corinthians 5:17) and the fruit of that new life in Christ (John 15). Assurance of salvation: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that salvation cannot be guaranteed or assured. 1 John 5:13 states that the letter of 1 John was written for the purpose of assuring believers of the CERTAINTY of their salvation. Good Works: The Roman Catholic Church states that Christians are saved by meritorious works (beginning with baptism) and that salvation is maintained by good works (receiving the sacraments, confession of sin to a priest, etc.) The Bible states that Christians are saved by grace through faith, totally apart from works (Titus 3:5; Ephesians 2:8-9; Galatians 3:10-11; Romans 3:19-24). Baptism: In the New Testament baptism is ALWAYS practiced AFTER saving faith in Christ. Baptism is not the means of salvation; it is faith in the Gospel that saves (1 Corinthians 1:14-18; Romans 10:13-17). The Roman Catholic Church teaches baptismal regeneration of infants, a practice never found in Scripture. The only possible hint of infant baptism in the Bible that the Roman Catholic Church can point to is that the whole household of the Philippian jailer was baptized in Acts 16:33. However, the context nowhere mentions infants. Acts 16:31 declares that salvation is by faith. Paul spoke to all of the household in verse 32, and the whole household believed (verse 34). This passage only supports the baptism of those who have already believed, not of infants. Prayer: The Roman Catholic Church teaches Catholics to not only pray to God, but also to petition Mary and the saints for their prayers. Contrary to this, we are taught in Scripture to only pray to God (Matthew 6:9; Luke 18:1-7). Priesthood: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that there is a distinction between the clergy and the "lay people," whereas the New Testament teaches the priesthood of all believers (1 Peter 2:9). Sacraments: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that a believer is infused with grace upon reception of the sacraments. Such teaching is nowhere found in Scripture. Confession: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that unless a believer is hindered, the only way to receive the forgiveness of sins is by confessing them to a priest. Contrary to this, Scripture teaches that confession of sins is to be made to God (1 John 1:9). Mary: The Roman Catholic Church teaches, among other things, that Mary is the Queen of Heaven, a perpetual virgin, and the co-redemptress who ascended into heaven. In Scripture, she is portrayed as an obedient, believing servant of God, who became the mother of Jesus. None of the other attributes mentioned by the Roman Catholic Church have any basis in the Bible. The idea of Mary being the co-redemptress and another mediator between God and man is not only extra-biblical (found only outside of Scripture), but is also unbiblical (contrary to Scripture). Acts 4:12 declares that Jesus is the only redeemer. 1 Timothy 2:5 proclaims that Jesus is the only mediator between God and men. Many other examples could be given. These issues alone clearly identify the Catholic Church as being unbiblical. Every Christian denomination has traditions and practices that are not explicitly based on Scripture. That is why Scripture must be the standard of Christian faith and practice. The Word of God is always true and reliable. The same cannot be said of church tradition. Our guideline is to be: "What does Scripture say?" (Romans 4:3; Galatians 4:30; Acts 17:11). 2 Timothy 3:16-17 declares, "All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting, and training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work."
Correct 100% about King Constantine. He spun the papacy into power with his political court, even mandating Sunday observation by law. Politics shounever mix with the church. Look what a killing machine the papacy became, slaying "hetetics" for the Roman empire. Disgusting murderers of millions. The whore was drunken with the blood of the saints, indeed.
@@cristianosiqueira1536 Yes. Your simplistic "no" cannot change the history books. Why not stop protecting the devil and his evil popes? Their whole job is to kill Protestants and their infants, according to the jesuit extreme oath of induction. "In her ( the papacy) was found the blood of ALL slain upon the earth."That's why the papacy is gong into the lake of fire very soon. Her cup of iniquity is full. I can't wait to see Romanism fried to a crisp for all the murders it has done.
Yes, in 313 the ruler Constantine claimed he had a dream that in the sign of 'IHS' ( really Isis, Horus, and Set), he would conquer. So he forced the Catholic church-state upon everyone, including Sunday enforcement laws with civil and criminal penalties for being caught working on his counterfeit Sunday-sabbath. The papacy thus began in tyranny, and aspires to rule the world once again with its Sun-day MARK OF THE BEAST. Coming soon :national Sunday laws per Poop Francisco's Laudato Si proclamation.
@Enix Blue Rain *Really? RUDorwhat? Your very own pope used the term R Catholic Church.* The first known occurrence of "Roman Catholic" as a synonym for "Catholic Church" was in communication with the Armenian Apostolic Church in 1208, after the East-West Schism. The last official magisterial document to use "Roman Catholic Church" was issued by Pope Pius XII in 1950. you siad assuming too many things such as "Roman Catholic Church" as the official name.
Lol ignorant much 1st inspired by God the Holy Ghost & spoken by St.Matthew in the apostles creed 33 A.D ....day of Pentecost ( start of the church )...." One , Holy, Catholic & Apostolic" 1st post apostle historical extant writing by one of the disciples St.Ignatious of Antioch 107 A.D . Get an education.
@@quiricomazarin476 *I love your tales. Where in Mat 16 or Acts 1-2 says the Church Christ founded was R Catholic Church?* you said spoken by St.Matthew in the apostles creed 33 A.D ....day of Pentecost ( start of the church )...." One , Holy, Catholic & Apostolic"
@@quiricomazarin476 *Most of Ignatius writings were forgeries. In the first place all writings including this does not say R Church = the Universal Church or the Church CHrist founded. You are misled.* *"catholic" in all writings refers to the Universal Christian Church. Not R Catholic Church. Church has always meant all churches + all believers. Nothing to do with Church of Rome (current r Catholic Church).* you said 1st post apostle historical extant writing by one of the disciples St.Ignatious of Antioch 107 A.D .
@@jediv3381 yes I know you heretics who have no historical proof to back you up as it falls apart. Your forced to ( as you always do ) tell half lies & untruths like your father Satan...to try & put a false strawman in the story. Even if it were so st.polycarp st.evodious ect....you would have to get rid or try & discredit every Christian in the original church ...including the apostles as they all were Catholic. But I'd like a list from you detailing who gave you your faith person to person back to christ....I know you can't without changing faith beliefs & doctrines as that is the essence of a protestant to go against truth & change. So please give me a list?
@@jediv3381 yeah dufus if you had a modicum of brain cells & knew history & weren't so full of lies.... You could see the Catholic church started on Pentecost day ( apostles creed ) it wasn't until its head went to Rome & put the headquarters there. But it's catholic primarily as not all Catholics follow the Roman rite DUH. Get an education before you put your foot in your mouth again.
The Catholic Church evolved over time I understand that it didn't start during his ministry crucifixion or after his Resurrection in a "chronological order" it evolved through the work of Christs followers of the day
What I've come across that is mentioned by historian's is that Constantine was not present at the council and he had converted to arianism i.e. Follower of arian belief that Jesus was only human not divine, which the council of Nicea had rejected and the main reason for the council.
Constantine was a PAGAN when he presided over the Council in Nicea. He appointed himself as Pope. His so-called conversion was on his deathbed. 2 Thessalonians 2:3 Let no one lead you astray in any way, because it will not come unless THE APOSTASY COMES FIRST and the man of lawlessness gets revealed, the son of destruction. 4 He stands in opposition and EXALTS HIMSELF above every so-called god or object of worship, so that he sits down in the temple of God, publicly showing himself to be a god. Always check. Don't go by what so-and-so said.
@@anomalousviewer3164 : There is something called Google. Please check things out. The title 'Pontifex Maximus' was a Roman title adopted into the Roman church. The word Pontiff comes from it. Refers to the Pope. Wikipedia would help.
@@tongakhan230 sounds like a term equal to the successor of the Roman title of Emperor. Makes sense the actual pope would wrestle it politically back from the Emperor
"Now I say to you that you are Peter (which means ‘rock’), and upon this rock I will build my church, and all the powers of hell will not conquer it." Question for those who reject Catholicism: If you believe in Jesus, then which present-day church did He built?
@@johnyang1420 Jesus started the Way. Constantine started the Romanist church/ state religion 300 years later. Jesus predicted the rise of the papal beast in Rome in Revelation 13.
Jesus started The Way, later called Christians ( not catholics) at Antioch. 300 years later, Constantine began the apostate Roman church-state k own as Catholicism. The reformers tried hard to correct the catholic errors and spread the word that the papacy was the antichrist power. But the jesuit order was created to suppress that truth. Today, the closest we have to truth is the Adventist church. Until recently, this church was the only one giving the biblical warning to come out of Babylon (the papacy), as well as honoring the 7th day Sabbath that the papacy changed to Sunday and violated God's law arrogantly Jesus did not build the Romanist church/state hybrid, but He sure warned udms about it in Revelation 13, 17, and 18. Come out of her!
For those who would claim that Peter is the rock upon which Christ’s church was built. This is not the case and there are many in church history who would disagree with Catholics on this matter. The Greek word for Peter is petros which means a single rock or a boulder. It is not upon him that Christ’s Church was built. The Greek word for rock in this passage is petra which means a rocky foundation or bedrock and it is upon this petra that Christ builds His church. Now what is the petra that Jesus is referring to? In context, it is the confession that Peter gave “you are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” It is upon this foundation, something revealed from the Father in heaven that Christ builds His church, not on a fallible and sinful man (like all of us) like Peter. The word Rock is a title God uses of Himself and it is clearly applied to Jesus (Deuteronomy 32:4, 15, 18, 32:30-31; 2 Samuel 23:3; Psalm 89:26; Isaiah 17:10; 30:29; 44:8; Habakkuk 1:12; 1 Corinthians 10:1-5; Matthew 16:18 Roman Catholicism claims that Peter was the first Pope and the office of Pope began with him. Based on Peter’s own words, we are given no indication that he was a pope or ever saw himself as the leader above all after Jesus’ ascension. 1 Peter 5:1-3 NASB [1] Therefore, I exhort the elders among you, as your fellow elder and witness of the sufferings of Christ, and a partaker also of the glory that is to be revealed, [2] shepherd the flock of God among you, exercising oversight not under compulsion, but voluntarily, according to the will of God; and not for sordid gain, but with eagerness; [3] nor yet as lording it over those allotted to your charge, but proving to be examples to the flock. CHURCH FATHERS QUOTES ON MATTHEW 16:18: Augustine of Hippo: “Peter, called after this rock, represented the person of the Church which is built upon this rock, and has received 'the keys of the kingdom of heaven.' For, ‘Thou art Peter’ and not Thou art the rock' was said to him. But 'the rock was Christ,' in confessing whom, as also the whole Church confesses, Simon was called Peter.” Jerome: “The one foundation which the apostolic architect laid is our Lord Jesus Christ. Upon this stable and firm foundation, which has itself been laid on solid ground, the Church of Christ is built .. for the Church was founded upon a rock ... upon this rock the Lord established his Church; and the apostle Peter received his name from this rock.... The rock is Christ, Who gave to His apostles, that they also should be called rocks, 'Thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build My Church.” John Chrysostom: “Thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my Church;' that is, on the faith of his confession.” Basil of Seluecia: “Now Christ called this confession a rock, and he named the one who confessed it 'Peter,' perceiving the appellation which was suitable to the author of this confession. For this is the solemn rock of religion, this the basis of salvation, this the wall of faith and the foundation of truth: 'For no other foundation can anyone lay than that which is laid, which is Christ Jesus.”
![Yeat & Summrs - GO2WORK [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/NEFEwfPcXRA/mqdefault.jpg)
![GUILTY GEAR -STRIVE- Season Pass 4 Playable Character #1 [Queen Dizzy] Trailer](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nXDsAgYXXv4/mqdefault.jpg)
"The authors of the Gospels never claimed to know the life of the Messiah?" Matthew was a disciple of Jesus. John was also the beloved disciple of Jesus.
Jesus Christ is the Truth.
@@apollo8352 God help you🙏
@@apollo8352 This is the disciple who is testifying to these things and wrote these things, and we know that his testimony is true.
- John 21:24
@@apollo8352 That's impossible because God will judge the sexually immoral. Jesus Christ is sinless.
@@ericsower7022 Hi there.... so what a technical discrepancy! I will tell you what, it is claimed to be the word of god and without error....for if it had errors then god would be fallible which is kind of a big thing in religion.
The point I hope you see is because of 'a technical error' or blatant lies you really cannot trust Paul's scriptures to be reliable testimony.
You of course know Paul did not have his claimed conversion until some time after 36AD, while the Jesus guy died in 30 or 33AD, depending on who is counting...So Paul never actually meet Jesus before his death, nor did Paul witness any of the biblical claims which is another big deal considering his scriptures make most of the main bible claims! Remember Galatians 1:11-16 Paul's scriptures contain no eye witness accounts, no information from any other person and no information from any other source, that is if you can believe Paul!
See were this is going?
As Paul’s writings preceded the gospels, it is ridiculous to claim that Paul “stripped the gospels of their Jewish content.”
I agree that Paul did not strip the gospels of their Jewish content, but the gospels happened before Paul even got saved and then later on wrote letters to different parts of the body of Yehoshua HaMeshiach (the original Hebrew Name of Jesus Christ). To say his letters preceded the gospels doesn’t make sense. But out of curiosity, what do you mean?
He means Paul wrote his letters before the gospels were written
@@FreeinChristForever not only it make sense, it is possible to demonstrate gospels were inspired by paulinism.
Of course, hardline believers will remain in denial.
@@tulenik71 What in the world is “paulism?” Is this some new type of religion that I’ve never heard of?
If you’re speaking of Paul the apostle then he’d be the first in line to be a witness AGAINST you for before he was Paul he was Saul and Saul hated ANYTHING and EVERYTHING to do with Christ and His followers to the point of putting them in prison to murdering them.
@FreeinChristForever we all know what paulism iS. pauls take on christinaity. Focus more on faith than works, play down jewish practices like removal of foreskin, etc.
Studying the history of the Orthodox Christians is a worthwhile exercise for people interested in Christian history. We in the West tend to ignore this side of Christianity, but that's a mistake if we're really interested in origins of our faith.
Absolutely agree the reason the early heresies were in the East is that’s where most of the battles over beliefs was waged Rome was pretty much a backwater in comparison to Constantinople
@@sewwhat6525 En Occidente es muy antiarrianismo por la herejía que duró más en el reino visigodo y lombardo.
Yeah I've been having these thoughts, mostly for conversion reasons. Unbelievers will throw this stuff at you all day but also it really is quite interesting. For example as you state as much as I disagree with Catholic doctrine(s) I cannot discount the fact that I wouldn't know anything about Christ if the CC were not is it was in terms of dominance. It's where I step back and just trust that God knows what he is doing.
@@greglongmore6503 So you disagree with the Catholic teachings, do you? Hmm, so what is it ? You disagree with is it about divorce perhaps? Jesus was really clear about that! Matthew 19: 9 Now I say this to you: anyone who divorces his wife -- I am not speaking of an illicit marriage -- and marries another, is guilty of adultery.'
@@greglongmore6503 About Idolatry
Exodus 20:4 You shall not make yourself a carved image or any likeness of anything in heaven above or on earth beneath or in the waters.
The Lord did not prohibit statues; he prohibited worshiping them. God actually commanded the making of images. Just five chapters later, God commanded Moses to build the Ark of the Covenant, which would contain the presence of God and was to be venerated as the holiest place in all of Israel. Here is what God commanded Moses concerning the statues on it:
And you shall make two cherubim of gold; of hammered work shall you make them, on the two ends of the mercy seat. Make one cherub on the one end, and one cherub on the other end; of one piece with the mercy seat shall you make the cherubim on its two ends (Ex. 25:18-19).
In Numbers 21:8-9, not only did our Lord order Moses to make another statue in the form of a bronze serpent, but he commanded the children of Israel to look at it in order to be healed. The context of the passage is one where Israel had rebelled against God, and a plague of deadly snakes was sent as a just punishment. This statue of a snake had no power of itself-we know from John 3:14 that it was merely a type of Christ-but God used this image of a snake as an instrument to effect healing in his people.
Further, in 1 Kings 6, Solomon built a temple for the glory of God, described as follows:
In the inner sanctuary he made two cherubim of olivewood, each ten cubits high. . . . He put the cherubim in the innermost part of the house. . . . He carved all the walls of the house round about with carved figures of cherubim and palm trees, and open flowers, in the inner and outer rooms. . . . For the entrance to the inner sanctuary he made doors of olivewood. . . . He covered the two doors of olivewood with carvings of cherubim, palm trees, and open flowers; he overlaid them with gold (1 Kgs. 6:23, 27, 29, 31, 32).
King Solomon ordered the construction of multiple images of things both “in heaven above” (angels) and “in the earth beneath” (palm trees and open flowers). After the completion of the temple, God declared he was pleased with its construction (1 Kgs. 9:3).
It becomes apparent, given the above evidence, that a strictly literal interpretation of Exodus 20:2-5 is erroneous. Otherwise, we would have to conclude that God prohibits something in Exodus 20 and elsewhere commands the very same thing.
Why would God use these images of serpents, angels, palm trees, and open flowers? Why didn’t he heal the people directly rather than use a “graven image”? Why didn’t he command Moses and Solomon to build an ark and a temple without any images at all?
First, God knows what his own commandments mean. He never condemned the use of statues absolutely. Second, God created man as a being who is both spiritual and physical. To draw us to himself, God uses both spiritual and physical means. He will use statues, the temple, or even creation itself to guide us to our heavenly home.
Psalm 19:1 tells us: “The heavens are telling the glory of God; and the firmament proclaims his handiwork.” Romans 1:20 says: “Ever since the creation of the world his invisible nature, namely, his eternal power and deity, has been clearly perceived in the things that have been made.” Gazing at a sunset-or a great painting of a sunset-and contemplating the greatness of God through the beauty of his creation is not idolatry. Nor is it idolatrous to look at statues of great saints of old and honor them for the great things God has done through them. It is no more idolatrous for us to desire to imitate their holy lives and honor them than it was for Paul to exhort the Corinthians to imitate his own holy life (1 Cor. 4:16) and to “esteem very highly” those who were “over [the Thessalonians] in the Lord and admonish [them]” (1 Thess. 5:12-13).
Having statues honoring God or great saints brings to mind. For Catholics, having statues is just as natural as-having pictures in our wallets to remind us of the ones we love here on earth. But reminding ourselves of loved ones is a far cry from idolatry.
I think your reference of Jesus travelling through Palestine is not historically accurate. Jesus traveled through Judea, also known as the land of Canaan. The people in this area called Philistines originated as an immigrant group from the Aegean (Greece) that settled in Canaan.
The land was renamed in 132-136 CE, by the Roman emperor Hadrian to Syria-Palaestina, the Jews traditional enemies, as punishment for the Jews insurrection at that time.
Palestine
Palestine is in Judea which is HEBREW for the Land of The Jews. Which is ISRAEL!!!
Here is some scripture that may clear the question about Jesus (Presonall) FOUNDED the RC Church. Read Matthew! Jesus came to establish the covenant Made between GOD and Abraham: Matthew 4:23 And Jesus went about all Galilee, teaching in their synagogues, and preaching the gospel of the Kingdom, Matthew 15:24, "But He (Jesus) answered and said, `I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.'" Jesus only interfaced with two (the woman and the Centurian) non-Jews throughout His total recorded Ministry. Jesus states His (total) purpose of his ministry: establish the Kingdom in Israel. Matthew 10:1-8, Jesus directed the Apostles (Peter, James, John...etc.) to minister to the Jews and NOT go to the Gentiles
@@elizabethmargaretroberts6727the current “Jews” aren’t the same as the original Christian Jews tho. They’re mostly Asian and polish etc. they adopted the title. Palestinians are genetically closer to what biblical Jews and Christian’s were
@@grdama quote--Here is some scripture that may clear the question about Jesus (Presonall) FOUNDED the RC Church...unquote
THAT IS ODD!! Not once is a church named Catholic ever mentioned in ANY BIBLE! That incliuides Catholic bibles!!!
FACT--First account of a church named catholic is by Ignatius of Antioch in 107AD!!!
Just toured Spain ,Italy and eastern Orthodox countries , then Israel , Jerusalem and Bethlehem - been to most of the historic areas Jesus walked and was born and crucified ....continuing my studies of religion and history . thank you!
Next go to the sites of the first seven original churches in western Anatolia.
READ ! Timothy ch.4 ,v.1-3 ............"TEACHINGS OF DEMONS "....... & "forbidding TO MARRY ", read , MATHEW CH.23. V 9 Do not call ANYONE on earth FATHER. !!
According to the Holy Quran, Jesus didn't claim that he was the son of Allah(God) But He said...
Zuhruf 64
I seek refugee in Allah from the Satan.
In the name of Allah ,Rahman ,Rahim
"Allah is my Lord and your Lord. So worship Him. This is a straight path."
-----------------
And on the resurrection day Allah will ask Jesus about the Christian faith.
Quran - Maaide 116-118
And [beware the Day] when Allah will say, "O Jesus, Son of Mary, did you say to the people, 'Take me and my mother as deities (gods) besides Allah?'" He will say, "Exalted are You! It was not for me to say that to which I have no right. If I had said it, You would have known it. You know what is within myself, and I do not know what is within Yourself. Indeed, it is You who is Knower of the unseen.
I said not to them except what You commanded me - to worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord. And I was a witness over them as long as I was among them; but when You took me up, You were the Observer over them, and You are, over all things, Witness.
If You should punish them - indeed they are Your servants; but if You forgive them - indeed it is You who is the Exalted in Might, the Wise.
----------------
If you love Jesus, accept him as a Messenger not as the God and not as the son of Allah. If you are follower of Jesus, believe in Messenger Muhammad, too. Because that's what he really wants you to do. And he heralded the coming of Messenger Muhammed. Jesus said to his people this👇👇👇
Quran -Saff -6
And [mention] when Jesus, the son of Mary, said, "O children of Israel, indeed I am the messenger of Allah to you confirming what came before me of the Torah and bringing good tidings of a messenger to come after me, whose name is Ahmad." But when he came to them with clear evidences, they said, "This is obvious magic."
Quran -Women 171
O People of the Scripture, do not commit excess in your religion or say about Allah except the truth. The Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, was but a messenger of Allah and His word which He directed to Mary and a soul [created at a command] from Him. So believe in Allah and His messengers. And do not say, "Three"; desist - it is better for you. Indeed, Allah is but one God. Exalted is He above having a son. To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth. And sufficient is Allah as Disposer of affairs.
----------------------------
I invite you to be a Muslim. Latest, last and only valid religion in the Hereafter. First step is to say "I witness that there is no god but ALLAH, and i witness that Mohammad is Messenger of Allah" and believe in this. Islam is a monotheistic religion. Allah doesn't accept the existence of false deities and He orders humanity to believe in only one God, Him. He explains why it is impossible the existence of gods other than Him in Holy Quran in chapter Isra which means The Night Journey and in chapter Enbiya which means Prophets.
Quran-Isra-43
Say, [O Muhammad], "If there had been with Him [other] gods, as they say, then they [each] would have sought to the Owner of the Throne a way."
Exalted is He and high above what they say by great sublimity.
The seven heavens and the earth and whatever is in them exalt Him. And there is not a thing except that it exalts [Allah] by His praise, but you do not understand their [way of] exalting. Indeed, He is ever Forbearing and Forgiving.
Quran-Prophets-22
Had there been within the heavens and earth gods besides ALLAH, they both would have been ruined. So exalted is Allah, Lord of the Throne, above what they describe.
--------------------
Six Pillars of Faith in Islam
1-To believe in Omnipotent Allah (GOD) (without ascribing partners to Him. Without saying "He has a son." Without saying "He has a helper out of weakness")
2-Angels (Without giving them woman names. Without saying "They are daughters of Allah")
3-All Holy Scriptures (Books revealed by Allah)
4-All Messengers (accepting them as human beings not gods or sons of God)
5-Judgement Day (Resurrection Day)
6-Destiny
Five Pillars of Islam
1- SHAHADA
To say "I witness that there is no god save Allah, and i witness that Muhammad is His Messenger."
2- SALAT
To perform prayer 5 times a day.
3- SAWM
Fasting in the month Ramadan according to lunar calendar. (29-30 days)
4- ZAKAT
If you are rich you give alms to poor people.
5- HAJJ
To make the pilgrimage to Mecca, Kaba if you can afford. You become a pilgrim after this visit.
Allah is satan. Islam was invented by satan to try undermine the one and only true God and Jesus.
Please read. Exodus 20 1-5
The existence of allah and mohumad is a blasphemy to the Lord God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Jesus says NOBODY comes to the Father EXCEPT through ME! The only way to salvation is through repentance of your sins and belief that the Lord Jesus Christ Yeshua died on the cross for our sins and iniquity and was raised back to life on the third day (as witnessed by hundreds) your salvation is not by works or how many times a day you pray but through the blood of Christ JESUS who died for YOU and me. I will pray for you brother. You must repent, reject Islam and follow JESUS, the son of David and Abraham!
I'll see you as a Muslim soon
I had about two minutes. The narrator says that Jesus chose 70 Gentiles, that’s not accurate and so it makes me doubt the accuracy of rest of this video. Gentiles we’re not brought in until Paul’s ministry.
Lies again? Cup Series USD SGD
Not true for there are places throughout the New Testament that Jesus is teaching non Jews, many of them became followers.
Actually, gentiles were not accepted until Peter's ministry. ref Acts chapter 10 with the convertion of Cornelius which was btw 50-55AD about 20 years after Jesus's death
Many gentiles did follow Jesus but were never accepted into the fold. When Jesus encounters a Jew He says follow me but when encountering a gentile, even if the gentile says' I want to follow you', Jesus says no, go now and tell others what you have seen. I'm afraid even Jesus rejected the gentiles because He was trying to fix Judaism first
@@marcelsantos203 Yes for the most part Jesus did avoid gentiles but scriptures show He did not turn them away if they needed His help. See Matthew 15:22, Luke 7:1-10 and John 4 as well.
Correction: John wrote John and was a disciple from the beginning."That which we have SEEN and HEARD from the beginning" Eyewitnesses. Matthew was a tax collector(educated) disciple. Mark wrote Peters recollections around 60 AD(peter crucified 67). Luke was a doctor who interviewed eyewitnesses including Mary.
Your commentary on Jesus dual nature was accurate.
Luke was a doctor?
@@nosuchthing8 Yep, a "Greek" (or non-Jewish) doctor. The other 3 gospel accounts were written by Jews. Luke's gospel is arranged more like a historical account, mostly in temporal order. The other three are arranged thematically, with less regard for how events unfolded along the timeline.
There were several direct inaccuracies about what is written in the NT. I get the impression the makers got most of this from 2nd hand sources as opposed to taking it directly from the NT and the Gospels. There is no other book in the world where the 2nd hand accounts of the text is more inaccurate that the Bible. Both books and secular scholars just flat out claim the exact opposite of what the text says on a regular basis. And its goes totally unquestioned.
Luke lived and worked many years along side Paul and the Apostles, the opening of his gospel makes clear he worked diligently with purpose to record a declaration of the first hand eyewitnesses of Christ from the beginning and give assurance that the order and detail of these things are for certain.
The vid also said "illiterate" fisherman. WOW That is grossly inaccurate as most fishermen were basically small business owners who had to be literal to run their business under the Roman Empire. Fisherman were in fact more literal and better educated than the average citizen.
I can see that the guy who tells the story, didn't read the bible.
In the face of adversity, you found strength, redemption, and a new purpose in life. 🙏💪 It's truly remarkable to see how your life has been turned around.
In the face of common sense you believe a fairytale
2:43 Already had a reputation as a political and religious agitator, especially among the Romans. Where do they get this? Mk.15:10 indicates that Pilate knew that it was from envy that the religious leaders delivered him up, and all 4 Gospels have Pilate wanting to release him because didn't find cause for saying he was a political agitator. So the Romans knew that his agitation was religious but not political. He said "Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's and to what is God's
My thought as well. Good catch
Its good place to send your son whos caught masterbating to gay porn.he will fit right in.
EXACTLY. I was just going to say this… In fact, the Romans didn’t care at all about Jesus when he was preaching
👏🏼 right on however the Romans feared the rising of Jesus’s followers because they were willing to die for the faith so in order to control the people they created the Catholic church in order to embrace the christian’s & have the control- there’s many documentary’s about this, & it makes sense - the catholic church doesn’t even follow Jesus’s teachings
why? because they truly didn’t know the truth & the way which is Jesus! they worship Mary not Jesus
I did a double take on that too. Christ was no politician, or governmental political agitator, at all, though he did get under the skin of the Pharisees and Sadducees, quite often, which was a good thing, but it got him crucified. I still picture those Jewish religious leaders saying to each other, "We got him. No more trouble from him."
NO, the purpose of Christ was not the preservation of the world. John never said such things.
Thank you
The purpose of Jesus Christ is not the preservation of the world but rather the preservation of the human soul,to save the soul from eternal destruction.
False ducumentary that starts with a lies. No need to watch till the end
@@bahbahjosh
Amen!
@@godwinfofung8109
Amen!
It’s videos like this that really magnify the importance of knowing and reading the Word of God for yourself…
Mathew
17 Jesus replied, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by flesh and blood, but by my Father in heaven. 18 And I tell you that you are Peter,[a] and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades[b] will not overcome it. 19 I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be[c] bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be[d] loosed in heaven
Rock/peter/cepha
There are so many things wrong in this video!
MATTHEW CHAPTER 16: VERSE 18.ARE 3 PARTS
#1. THE CHANGING NAME OF SIMON BAR-JONAH > SIMON CEPHAS [ JOHN CHAPTER 1: VERSE 41- 42.]
#2. THE ANOUCEMENT OF THE FOUNDATION OF OUR FAITH.
THE DEATH OF THE SACRIFICE
#3. THE TRIUMPHANT VICTORY AGAINST HELL AND THE GLORIOUS LIFE.
IN VERSE 21. REPEATING VERSE 18.#1. THE FOUNDATION OF OUR FAITH
#2. 2ND THE DEATH OF THE SACRIFICE
#3. THE TRIUMPHANT RESURRECTION
THESE WAS CONFIRMED AND ATTESTED BY APOSTLE PAUL IN 1ST CORINTHIANS CHAPTER 15: ACCORDING TO THE SCRIPTURES [ PLURAL SCRIPTURES FROM THE OLD TESTAMENT 1. GENESIS CHAPTER 3: VERSE 15. THE BIRTH OF THE HOLY SEED SACRIFICE.
THE DEATH OF THE SACRIFICE LAMB < GENESIS CHAPTER 3: VERSE 21.
THE TRIUMPHANT VICTORY OF LIFE < GENESIS CHAPTER 3: VERSE 24.
ISAIAH CHAPTER 6: VERSE 13.THE HOLY SEED
ISAIAH CHAPTER 7: VERSE 14
ISAIAH CHAPTER 8: VERSE 14- VERSE 16
ISAIAH CHAPTER 9: VERSE 6
ISAIAH CHAPTER 40: VERSE 3,VERSE 23.
ISAIAH CHAPTER 42: VERSE 1,VERSE 6,VERSE 11
ISAIAH CHAPTER 43: VERSE 10,VERSE 15
ISAIAH CHAPTER 44: VERSE 6,VERSE 8
ISAIAH 45: VERSE 15
ISAIAH CHAPTER 53: VERSE 10, VERSE 15
LUKE CHAPTER 1: VERSE 35.THE HOLY SEED
MATTHEW CHAPTER 1: VERSE 18 THE HOLY SEED
LUKE CHAPTER 2: VERSE 32
MATTHEW CHAPTER 12: VERSE 21.[ ACCORDING TO THE SCRIPTURES ISAIAH CHAPTER 42: VERSE 1, VERSE 6,VERSE 11. THE GENTILES PEOPLE ARE INCLUDING IN THE PLAN OF REDEMPTION AND SALVATION> MALACHI CHAPTER 1: VERSE 1,VERSE 6,VERSE 11.> ACTS CHAPTER 9: VERSE 5,VERSE 15,VERSE 17-18. < JOHN CHAPTER 10: VERSE 16.LETTER B.,JOHN CHAPTER 15: VERSE 20.,JOHN CHAPTER 17: VERSE 20., JOHN CHAPTER 20: VERSE 21.I.N.G, VERSE 29.LETTER B. THE GENTILES PEOPLE ARE INCLUDING IN THE REDEMPTION AND SALVATION. )
ACCORDING TO THE SCRIPTURES < JOHN CHAPTER 1: VERSE 1,VERSE 6,VERSE 14,VERSE 18,VERSE 29,VERSE 33,VERSE 36. THE 1ST APPEARANCE OF GOD THROUGH THE HOLY SEED , IN THE NEW TESTAMENT
#2. 2ND APPEARANCE OF GOD THROUGH THE GLORIFIED BODY
ACCORDING TO THE SCRIPTURES < ISAIAH CHAPTER 28: VERSE 16,VERSE 19. JOHN CHAPTER 2: VERSE 19,VERSE 21,VERSE 22. MATTHEW CHAPTER 10: VERSE 23., JOHN CHAPTER 14: VERSE 3., MATTHEW CHAPTER 28: MARK CHAPTER 26: LUKE CHAPTER 24: JOHN CHAPTER 20: THE 2ND APPEARANCE OF GOD THROUGH THE GLORIFIED BODY
#3. THE 3RD APPEARING OF GOD SHALL BE IN THE 3RD COMING OF GOD> LUKE CHAPTER 17: VERSE 37
LUKE CHAPTER 18: VERSE 8
LUKE CHAPTER 19: VERSE 27. NO LONGER AS LAMB, NO LONGER AS PRIEST, NO LONGER AS PRINCE, BUT LORD OF lords, KING OF kings, GOD OF gods < JOSHUA CHAPTER 22: VERSE 22., JEREMIAH CHAPTER 10: VERSE 10. 2ND THESALONIANS CHAPTER 1: VERSE 8. ISAIAH CHAPTER 24: VERSE 23., MATTHEW CHAPTER 24: VERSE 28,VERSE 30,VERSE 32. REVELATIONS CHAPTER 1: VERSE 7-8, VERSE 17-18., ACTS CHAPTER 1: VERSE 10- 12., AMOS CHAPTER 4: VERSE 12- 13., AMOS CHAPTER 8: VERSE 9.THE LORD GOD ALL MIGHTY. 🙏
HE SHALL COME AND REIGN IN MOUNT OF OLIVES 🫒 MATTHEW CHAPTER 28: VERSE 16., ACTS CHAPTER 1: VERSE 10- 12., ISAIAH CHAPTER 24: VERSE 23.LETTER C. IN MOUNT ZION, IN JERUSALEM, IN ISRAEL 🇮🇱, NOT SOMEWHERE ELSE IN THE PARTS OF THE EARTH/ GLOBE/ WORLD. TO REIGN 1,000 YEARS OF PEACE AND PROSPERITY. GOD BLESS US ALL 🇺🇸 🌎 🇺🇲
LIKE IN THE OLD TESTAMENT GOD APPEARED TO PROPHET ABRAHAM 3XTIMES IN DIFFERENT WAYS [ NOT SIMULTANEOUSLY, BUT IN DIFFERENT TIMES OF SITUATIONS]
#1. 1ST APPEARANCE TO ABRAHAM GENESIS CHAPTER 14: VERSE 18. IN PRIESTHOOD APPEARANCE
#2. 2ND APPEARANCE TO ABRAHAM GENESIS CHAPTER 18: VERSE 2,VERSE 20. IN ANGELIC JUDGE APPEARANCE
IN GENESIS CHAPTER 18: VERSE 14. HE PROMISE TO ABRAHAM AND SARAH TO COMING BACK AGAIN.
#3. 3RD APPEARANCE TO ABRAHAM IN GENESIS CHAPTER 21: VERSE 1. IN LIFE APPEARANCE. THE SAME IN THE NEW TESTAMENT 3XTIMES APPEARANCE
#1. 1ST APPEARANCE JOHN CHAPTER 1:VERSE 6,VERSE 14,VERSE 28,VERSE 29,VERSE 33,VERSE 36. AS SACRIFICE LAMB APPEARANCE
#2. 2ND APPEARANCE JOHN CHAPTER 2: VERSE 19, VERSE 21,VERSE 22., MATTHEW CHAPTER 10:: VERSE 23., JOHN CHAPTER 14: VERSE 3., MATTHEW CHAPTER 28: MARK CHAPTER 16: LUKE CHAPTER 24: JOHN CHAPTER 20: AS GLORIFIED BODY [ OF THE HOLY SEED < JOHN CHAPTER 12: VERSE 24., JOHN CHAPTER 12: VERSE 28., JOHN CHAPTER 13:: VERSE 31- VERSE 32., JOHN CHAPTER 14: VERSE 22., JUDAS CHAPTER 1: VERSE 3, VERSE 9,VERSE 20.THE MOST HOLY FAITH.
#3. 3RD APPEARING SHALL BE IN THE 3RD COMING LUKE CHAPTER 17: VERSE 37
LUKE CHAPTER 18: VERSE 8
LUKE CHAPTER 19: VERSE 27
LUKE CHAPTER 21: VERSE 25- 26
MATTHEW CHAPTER 24: VERSE 28,VERSE 30,VERSE 32.
MATTHEW CHAPTER 25:
REVELATIONS CHAPTER 1: VERSE 7-8, VERSE 17-18, REVELATIONS CHAPTER 19:
ISAIAH CHAPTER 24 VERSE 23.
AMOS CHAPTER 4: VERSE 12- 13., AMOS CHAPTER 8: VERSE 9.
DANIEL CHAPTER 7: VERSE 9,VERSE 13. IN GLORIOUS ANCIENTS DAYS,
ISAIAH CHAPTER 24: VERSE 23. IN ANCIENTS GLORIOUSLY REIGN.
GOD BLESS US ALL 🇺🇸 🌎 🇺🇲
fairytales
There are lots of inaccuracies in this video; subtle but important. The first clue to anyone paying attention is the use of Common Era (CE) and BCE instead of AD and BC. Christians would never do that.
Any modern scholar uses CE and BCE.
@@nbenefiel And for what reason should they stop calling the presocratics - the philosophers before Socrates - by the name of presocratics? Catholics will so easily follow after the communists. It is a marriage made in heaven.
Any modem woke scholar@@nbenefiel
@David19746 Why? Most of us don't feel it is normal driving from orgy too orgy hopping from bed to bed from filthy harlot to filthy harlots. That's why. We shouldn't just change things just because a radical pointy headed professor thinks we should.
@@WilliamJones-sf5pt The early Christians lived communally and shared their incomes. We haven’t done that since the fourth century.
Actually,
Paul was highly educated
Luke was a physician (not a sinner from the street or poor man)
Matthew was a definitely educated and wealthy man working in “irs” so to speak
And one was a fisherman and the other a teenager. Do you think fishermen were literate in the bronze age?
Actually,
They were all ignorant poor men, otherwise they’d never fall for Christ’s bs. 😂
@@someguy5438 They were way passed the bronze age by that point but your point still stands. Also Matthew didn't work in the 'IRS' lol, he was just a straight up tax collector
@firelxrd420 3300 BC
The Bronze Age timeline is different in areas all over the world so the years can change depending on each historical civilization. However, most historians agree that it began around 3300 BCE and lasted almost 2000 years until around 1200 BCE.
Dong correct me if you are wrong.
@@someguy5438 How am I wrong? You literally just said it lasted until around 1200 BC. So a thousand years before Christ. And we're talking about the antourage of Christ. What?
Rome wasn’t practicing Christianity from the beginning. Rome was persecuting Christians.
Not all of the time. They were accepted for large periods of time until they refused to carry out Roman god worship rituals which had been written into law by one of the emperors - I forget which one. The Romans were brutal but generally didn't try to wipe out worship of other deities.
That your Pastors taught you, read the Bible and there are Christian but persecuted until they won population, don't listen to your Pastors, only hatred in their heart..
@@dailyviewstv5323 Question: "Are Catholic beliefs and practices biblical?"
Answer: The issue concerning any church and its practices should be "Is this Biblical?" If a teaching is Biblical (taken in context), it should be embraced. If it is not, it should be rejected. God is more interested in whether a church is doing His will and obeying His Word than whether it can trace a line of succession back to Jesus' apostles. Jesus was very concerned about abandoning the Word of God to follow the traditions of men (Mark 7:7). Traditions are not inherently invalid-there are some good and valuable traditions. Again, the issue must be whether a doctrine, practice, or tradition is Biblical. How then does the Roman Catholic Church compare with the teachings of the Word of God?
Salvation: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that salvation is by baptismal regeneration and is maintained through the Catholic sacraments unless a willful act of sin is committed that breaks the state of sanctifying grace. The Bible teaches that we are saved by grace which is received through simple faith (Ephesians 2:8-9), and that good works are the result of a change of the heart wrought in salvation (Ephesians 2:10; 2 Corinthians 5:17) and the fruit of that new life in Christ (John 15).
Assurance of salvation: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that salvation cannot be guaranteed or assured. 1 John 5:13 states that the letter of 1 John was written for the purpose of assuring believers of the CERTAINTY of their salvation.
Good Works: The Roman Catholic Church states that Christians are saved by meritorious works (beginning with baptism) and that salvation is maintained by good works (receiving the sacraments, confession of sin to a priest, etc.) The Bible states that Christians are saved by grace through faith, totally apart from works (Titus 3:5; Ephesians 2:8-9; Galatians 3:10-11; Romans 3:19-24).
Baptism: In the New Testament baptism is ALWAYS practiced AFTER saving faith in Christ. Baptism is not the means of salvation; it is faith in the Gospel that saves (1 Corinthians 1:14-18; Romans 10:13-17). The Roman Catholic Church teaches baptismal regeneration of infants, a practice never found in Scripture. The only possible hint of infant baptism in the Bible that the Roman Catholic Church can point to is that the whole household of the Philippian jailer was baptized in Acts 16:33. However, the context nowhere mentions infants. Acts 16:31 declares that salvation is by faith. Paul spoke to all of the household in verse 32, and the whole household believed (verse 34). This passage only supports the baptism of those who have already believed, not of infants.
Prayer: The Roman Catholic Church teaches Catholics to not only pray to God, but also to petition Mary and the saints for their prayers. Contrary to this, we are taught in Scripture to only pray to God (Matthew 6:9; Luke 18:1-7).
Priesthood: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that there is a distinction between the clergy and the "lay people," whereas the New Testament teaches the priesthood of all believers (1 Peter 2:9).
Sacraments: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that a believer is infused with grace upon reception of the sacraments. Such teaching is nowhere found in Scripture.
Confession: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that unless a believer is hindered, the only way to receive the forgiveness of sins is by confessing them to a priest. Contrary to this, Scripture teaches that confession of sins is to be made to God (1 John 1:9).
Mary: The Roman Catholic Church teaches, among other things, that Mary is the Queen of Heaven, a perpetual virgin, and the co-redemptress who ascended into heaven. In Scripture, she is portrayed as an obedient, believing servant of God, who became the mother of Jesus. None of the other attributes mentioned by the Roman Catholic Church have any basis in the Bible. The idea of Mary being the co-redemptress and another mediator between God and man is not only extra-biblical (found only outside of Scripture), but is also unbiblical (contrary to Scripture). Acts 4:12 declares that Jesus is the only redeemer. 1 Timothy 2:5 proclaims that Jesus is the only mediator between God and men.
Many other examples could be given.
These issues alone clearly identify the Catholic Church as being unbiblical. Every Christian denomination has traditions and practices that are not explicitly based on Scripture. That is why Scripture must be the standard of Christian faith and practice. The Word of God is always true and reliable. The same cannot be said of church tradition. Our guideline is to be: "What does Scripture say?" (Romans 4:3; Galatians 4:30; Acts 17:11). 2 Timothy 3:16-17 declares, "All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting, and training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work."
Vatican =Satan worshipping
@@dailyviewstv5323 sadly the bible isn't a very historically correct document and has been messed with over the years. Unlike a lot of US citizens I don't have some 'hokey' pastor, I prefer facts.
You completely skipped over the fact that Nero also had St. Peter killed by crucifixion upside-down. He is literally the "Rock of the Church." His remains are directly under the main alter at St. Peter's Basilica in Vatican City.
The papacy has lied about so many things, that we really don't know if Peter is there or not. After all, they lied about him being the first pope appointed by Jesus, lied about Sunday being the new Lord's Day, lied about the mass murders of the inquisitions, about Mary being the queen of heaven, about the pope being christ on earth, etc etc.
Romanism, in fact, is the ultimate counterfeit church, created by the father of lies, to pervert the simple gospel.
Rock of the Church! So you believe he was the first Pope? If you do that's not what Jesus meant when he said those words.
@@leonflores2933 AMEN.
And since Jesus didn't appoint Peter or ANY popes, the whole catholic church collapses. Since the catholic church was not started by Jesus or the apostles, it is a bastard child of Constantine and an orphan. That is why God tells His people to get out of her and avoid her pagues.
@leonflores2933 yes Simon "Peter" (or Cephus) was the first Pope.
@@heydeereman1040 Every papist makes these baseless decrees with exactly ZERO evidence, as if repeating the lie often enough, as Hitler said to do, would actually make it real. What bullshit.
Now,how about showing some Gardiner evidence that Peter was somehow a pope, as if popes are biblical at ALL.PS: just quoting Matthew 16 does not count, since there is NO MENTION of any pope there. And there is no other scripture to twist into this doctrine, so you're outta luck.
The man of sin In the Vatican is a complete SCAM
Years ago I watched a panel of theologians discussing the Bible. I came to believe the Bible speaks to each of our circumstances & we get something different from it each time we read it.
It’s called “the living Word.”
lol - Ancient people living under Kings, Dictators used them as a template for God - hence all the
Get down on our knees, beg, grovel, blindly obey, sing only his Praises etc
Simple, primitive people without much knowledge of the world around them envisioned an afterworld that was similar to the life they had in the REAL WORLD - a King like God sitting on his throne in the heavens, Heaven is his Kingdom and only those who believe and support him are allowed in. The rest left to suffer
You are praying to long dead Kings, Dictators
The Catholics attribute Jesus saying something like "upon this rock I'll build my church". Church in old Greek is ekklesía, which means assembly. Catholics argue that Jesus meant assembly as an institution, i.e. a permanent assembly. And also claim that Jesus mean Peter, the first Pope, to be the "rock", as Peter comes from the old Greek Petros meaning "rock". This is why they claim Catholicism was established by Jesus himself.
What would anyone gain by arguing with your corked???
Don't even get me started on Peter Pan.
Some if the statements are wrong. The gospel written was inspired by the Spirit of God through His men. Is not collective memory. Mr. Luke wrote on accounts of what he saw. And Christianity started within Jews in jaruselm by 12 and later 70 72 before it went outside
ruclips.net/video/_RioVzvSMjY/видео.html
Have you proof that the bible is inspired by god? The bible is not god's word, but man made.
@@heinmolenaar6750 The New Testament is man made inspired by Jesus. The Old Testament is man made inspired by God. Hope that clears up the confusion....
@@serpentsepia6638 ALL scripture is inspired by God, God-breathed, men wrote as led by the Holy Spirit. ALL of the Bible is God's Word.
Christianity as sutch , is mixed with Baàl (Nimrod who was incarnated by Satan ) , birthday is 25 Desember , easter rabbits and eggs , is the firtillaty god where they slept together , and 9 month's later these baby's were on the Baàl altaar.
Al these "Christain hollydays are Baàl hulliday's. Jew's pray to Satan , there father ( John 8: 44) and the Jew started every Christain religion and walked away with the money.
Catholic chuch treasurekeeper is Rotschild of London.
First mistake BCE...it's BC before Christ.
You have just lost me.
When they write Before Common Era, BCE I have to suspect their bias.
@@thedowagerd.2431 Your totally right.
This is why Putin said he doesn't want Russia infected by western disease.
Only Public figure not afraid to respect Christ in Public.
West is EVIL.. Disney is Evil as well.
America the Evil.
@The Dowager D. thats fine, as long as when you see BC you also recognize their bias.
@@partydean17 yep only for God he deserves it.. not your u
I am proud catholic man i love jesus is king and my protector and healer✌♥️🤧🙏
you can be proud of that, but not the roman catholic church. it has too many man-made doctrines and practices which defy the word of God, such as mariology.
The bible says, "pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall." So, which comes first, religion, which can't save you, or the son of the living God?
It's nonsense you fool
Pride made lucifer the evil one. God resists tge proud but gives grace to the humble.
@@robinthomas2847 some people put, their religion above, Christ, which is the same as the lord mentioned about, "having, the two masters."
“The authors never claimed to know the life of the Messiah“
Really?
1 John 1
That which was from the beginning, that which we have heard, that which we have seen with our eyes, that which we have gazed upon, and our hands have handled, concerning the Word of life--
You do realize the man writing this letter is John himself. You know, the Apostle John… Saint John? The same John who walked and talked with Jesus for three years?
Fake news. If you’re this far off base at 3 minutes in, there’s no reason to watch the rest.
Biblical scholars widely agree that there is no evidence that the Apostle John actually wrote the Gospel of John. It was attributed to him long after it was written.
@@jbw53191 good lord dude pay attention before you respond.
Unbelievably stupid comment ; ." The authors never claimed to know the life of the Messiah.“ Moronic at its very worst.
Bravo! Well said.
So tired of glib statements that ignore the contrary evidence.
Agree.
Where do you get the idea that the 12 were Jewish and the 70(72) were gentiles? The only lists of the 70(72) that I can find with a quick Google search list both Jewish and Gentile names among the 70(72). I would be ever so grateful if you could cite your source for that claim so that I can look into it.
Good point: he would hardly have that many gentile disciples and so few Jewish ones: this looks like a later gloss
There is no gloss to which to attribute this idea. That is just an objective error.
I think you mean Ignatius of Antioch when referring to his letter of 108. It looks like you have a picture of Ignatius of Loyola who was not born until 1491.
Roman Catholicism started in Rome.
Jerusalem. It just wasn't called that yet.
Another, at Pentcost in Jerusalem.
I might disagree about that collective memory thing(exception being Luke) but 1.the gospels claim to have been an eyewitness account for the life and ministry of christ. 2.it claims to have some sort of a divine inspiration behind it.
Matthew was with Jesus, John was Jesus. Whoever wrote is knowing contradiction what was actually written in the Bible. and should have stated evidence immediately. Not blatantly lied. He is also deceived the listener. All the narrator has was site this and why. Knowingly deceiving. Came to get/find evidence of how 2nd century church leaders sold out. What real evidence pro or con , you won’t find it with fictional wishing. If you want to prove something fiction, you don’t start with fiction.
Of course, we are to understand that Jesus is like us, he understands our predicament and temptations and watches our success and failures and dis interest. And Mary His /Our mother also is watching.....O'My Jesus forgive us our sins, save us from the fires of hell, lead all souls to heaven especially those who have most need of thy Mercy.Amen.
@Pat Ludwain the year 382 AD Pope Damasus I gave the world the Bible!!! 73 books total!!! 46 books in the old testament, the one that Jesus read in the synagogues every Saturday!
I can assure you, that Peter has NOTHING to do with the Catholic Church. Peter would be the last one to worship Mary. The video is a lie bases on lies of Catholicism thrown together by satan.
Catholicism was started by Ignatus who defected from The Saints in 90 A.D. because he didn’t want to share in leadership. Ignatus wanted to be The Sole Leader, so he started Catholicism and elevated the office of a bishop to head leader and self proclaimed himself to be a bishop.
I am a senior citizen, we were taught this at a young age , but now lies are being mingled in by satan to hide the truth of the matter. As a matter of fact we were taught in school and college at that time that the world’s three major religions were Catholics , Christians , and Jews. This was before Muslims had a explosive growth. The Catholics just started to call themselves Christians about maybe 20 years ago or so
Catholics do not follow the same doctrine as Christians.
Catholics esteem Mary as the Highest and that’s who they pray to.
Christians KNOW CHRIST as The Highest and that’s who we pray to.
Catholics think salvation is through the works.
Christians know salvation is to be BORN AGAIN of water and of The Spirit, like Jesus Christ said in John 3:5.
Catholics believe in baptizing babies.
Christians know that Jesus said Children are already the Greatest in The Kingdom of GOD
@Pat Ludwa Mt.8:14 and Lk.4:38 also mention Peters mother-in-law.
I find it odd that this "history" of how Catholicism started doesn't even explain why the word was even used. Catholic comes from the Greek meaning "universal" and "of the whole"; The term was used to differentiate the Church from any of a number of heresies which propped up in the first few centuries. Catholics were not Gnostics, Arians, nor Donatists etc...
The pagan Catholicism is a heresy itself.
I AGREE
The book of Luke is written using only eye witness testimony. I find that just amazing. Thank God for the cross, the blood & Jesus Christ. Without Him all is lost.
😂 Anyone could write that. The entire book sounds fictional
Five eyewitnesses is not true.
Glory be to The Father, The Son and The Holy Spirit Amen ✝️💕
Born again, or to experience the new birth, is a phrase, particularly in evangelicalism, that refers to a "spiritual rebirth", or a regeneration of the human spirit. In contrast to one's physical birth, being "born again" is distinctly and separately caused by the operation of the Holy Spirit. John 3:3
Yet Jesus explained being born again is by baptism, thus naming water and the spirit. Not some made up self pronouncement.
@@dan_m7774 The point, one can't see the kingdom of God, much less, enter into it. John 3:3 is something He does, and it's not accomplished by man, human effort.
Nicodemus thought it was re-entering the womb.
He had a carnal understanding on the nature of the kingdom.
It doesn't come with observation.
And, no one's soul salvation hinges on a piece of real estate on a piece of dirt in the middle east.
2 Corinthians 5:16; John 4:21
Explained well....
@@georgebentonjr3876 Baptism is a grace from God, through Spirit and Water. The heavenly reality came into flesh through Christ. It seems you have a misunderstanding that the material world can not be of God. Baptism of Water and Spirit does save you, because God is not limited only to the invisible.
@@dan_m7774 ""Baptism is a grace from God, through Spirit and Water. The heavenly reality came into flesh through Christ. It seems you have a misunderstanding that the material world can not be of God. Baptism of Water and Spirit does save you, because God is not limited only to the invisible."" end quote.
One of the reasons that Christ was a stone of stumbling and a rock of offense was because He was proclaiming a spiritual kingdom:
My kingdom is not of this world - John 18:36; the kingdom of God is within you - Luke 17:20-21.
Clearly, the majority of the Jews missed their Messiah because they were looking for a physical kingdom.
The disciples too, were looking for a physical kingdom, prior to Pentecost, they held that expectation and view.
After Pentecost, when they received the Holy Spirit, Who led them "into all truth" and taught them of the "things to come," their understanding of the nature of the kingdom was enlightened, and they no longer taught of a physical kingdom. Rather, they applied spiritual interpretations to Old Testament prophecies, used them to describe the Church, and associated the kingdom with the gospel.
The veil of Moses had been removed.
Jesus Rules
Jesus Rules and Romans drool.
He does not
It’s hard to by the claim that the Evangelists did not mean to provide a biographical account of Jesus’ life as they followed characteristics of biography of their time. So if their writings followed this model it would follow they meant the Gospels as biographies which were historical albeit from different perspectives meant for different audiences.
God sacrificed himself to himself where is the sacrifice love fairy tells
@@haroldkmayes3591 Not to mention that is stated in the Bible that no one can pay for the sins of others. Christianity is a bunch of nonsense created by Roman Empire.
@@zedwart8534 You're not wrong. But you're also no entirely correct either. True Christianity is about understanding that the antagonist is the self proclaimed God of the Old Testament. This has been hidden by both the Catholic faith and the Jews. Yahweh is, quite literally, Satan. Any child can make this connection and see the glaringly obvious contradiction between Yahweh and Yeshua when reading the bible for themselves. One commits infanticide, the other states that hurting children is wrong... One reveals himself to Moses and speaks to him face to face, the other states very clearly that God has never been seen by any man. There is a reason why Jesus calls Satan "The Father of Lies", he's been lying to the Jews for thousands of years...
@@haroldkmayes3591 Understanding sacrifice in the vein of gift with respect to the idea of covenant is the key to understanding Christian beliefs. I have no doubt you have no intention of properly doing so, but this was more for anyone that may read your comment.
@@zedwart8534 God is Love, and with Love all things are possible!
Trying to disprove this is like trying to prove you are not alive,
Which I very much hope you don't! Facing the fire or the jump from the Twin Towers I'm pretty sure I would have jumped, but you don't know until you have to choose. I hope you choose life,
by far the best option! 🙂
As a Roman Catholic, my sights are set on Jesus. period. The frailties of men, noted, but set aside.
Who cares
You look like brainwashed and blinded by faith. It's litterally created from the fabric of nothing, just like things on technology. It's literally nothing, yet you all follow blind and if you can convince yourself well it must be true right. Ahaha society is so done for. The end needs to come already.
Jesus preached mainly to his Jewish brethren. All the disciples were also Jewish & the New Testament borrowed much from the Old Testament .
When Jesus and the Apostles preached, the Old Testament was all they used (they didn’t use the apocryphal books that the Rome cult uses)
@@chrislachat459of course because the Old Testament existed before the New Testament. What was Rome's connection to the New Testament that you mentioned it like it was the creation of Rome? Read your history!!
So what is your point? The New Testament derived a lot from the Old Testament and is a continuation and fulfilment of the old. What's the problem?
And ?
Jesus and the apostles taught from the Torah.
His nature is shown through his people that accept his spirit. Be ye Holy as your father in heaven is.
@catholic defence and truth seekers *You keep L. 1. Exact Word Criterion is Not a proof for doctrines. The word trinity is not in the Bible but the doctrine is. Similarly Faith Alone which means Salvation Not By Works. 2. Old Catholic Bibles do show Sola Fede/Faith Alone. You were refuted right from beginning yet you kept L for 5 days.*
“ Catholic translators before the time of Luther had given the same translation. So in the Nuremberg Bible, 1483, "Nur durch den glauben." And the Italian Bibles of Geneva, 1476, and of Venice, 1538, per sola fede. The Fathers also often use the expression, "man is justified by faith alone;"
Swan, James. "Luther Added The Word "Alone" to Romans 3:28?". February 05, 2006. Retrieved 29 March 2014.
Hodge, Charles, Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans (New Edition), 1864, p100
Even some Catholic versions of the New Testament also translated Romans 3:28 as did Luther. The Nuremberg Bible (1483), “allein durch den glauben” and the Italian Bibles of Geneva (1476) and of Venice (1538) say “per sola fede.” Others previous to Luther may have differed in theological interpretation, yet saw the thrust of the words implied “alone.”
The Romanists, indeed, made a great outcry against that version as a gross perversion of Scripture, although Catholic translators before the time of Luther had given the same translation. So in the Nuremberg Bible, 1483, "Nur durch den glauben." And the Italian Bibles of Geneva, 1476, and of Venice, 1538, per sola fede. The Fathers also often use the expression, "man is justified by faith alone;" so that Erasmus, De Ratione Concionandi, Lib. III., says, "Vox sola, tot clamoribus lapidata hoc saeculo in Luthero, reverenter in Patribus auditur." See Koppe and Tholuck on this verse.
you said
almost 5 days now and not one single verse on faith alone
The Encyclopedia of Religion admits: “Theologians today are in agreement that the Hebrew Bible does not contain a doctrine of the Trinity.” And the New Catholic Encyclopedia also says: “The doctrine of the Holy Trinity is not taught in the O[ld] T[estament].”
BTW your narrator has a great voice ..... i do the same work, but his voice totally works for your narrative! Good job
Pretty sure it's not a human narrator.
@@3ggshe11swhat makes you say that? did he mispronounce a word or just because of how good it sounds
@@SpotlightGraphics It's AI, text to speech
8:48 The Creed can be traced back to within 20 years of Jesus death. Paul's epistle to the Corinthians expresses the Creed and its relation to the "Church of God" . In the epistles Paul speaks in further depth about the organization of the Church and speaks highly of the Church.
Paul speaks highly of the church known as The Way, later known as Christians in Antioch.
This is in stark contrast to the counterfeit church/state hybrid known as the papacy, which bears little resemblance to the pure, non-politically involved, popeless church of apostolic times, which did not go about killing "hetetics" in the holocaust known as the Catholic inquisitions.
@@TIJoe-te9quyou're a fool. Stop.
@@TIJoe-te9qu Nothing you said even makes sense. The Holocaust was committed by German socialists not Catholics 😂 are you stupid?
@@TIJoe-te9quExactly! More people need to read Foxes Book of Martyrs !
@@Revelation18-4 I don't know how papists can turn a blind eye to those ruthless mass murders done as "service to God. "
Very nice video! Thank you for putting together all the interesting facts. Just one thing I noticed that is not accurate. At minute marker 7:06 the narrator says that Saint Ignatius used the word, "catholic" in a letter he wrote in the year 108. The image shows Ignatius of Loyola, who was born in 1491 and died in 1556. There was a previous Saint Ignatius (of Antioch) also known as Saint Ignatius Theophorus. This one is known for his letters. The dates of his birth and death are uncertain (as well as most of his letters), but it is likely that the reference in the video corresponds to this one (Saint Ignatius of Antioch) , rather than the one depicted (Saint Ignatius of Loyola), who founded the Jesuits in 1540.
In response to the goodness of the Reformation, Loyola was commissioned to found the jez-ewe-it order, whose sole mission was to suppress the truth of the reformers, who had positively identified the popes as the biblical antichrist power. This order was to use any means, including mass murder, just like the inquisitions, to accomplish this task. They are one of the most despicable groups to curse the face of the earth, so dastardly that Jefferson and Lincoln warned us about them, and even several popes outlawed them THAT'S pretty bad.
quote--- At minute marker 7:06 the narrator says that Saint Ignatius used the word, "catholic" in a letter he wrote in the year 108. The image shows Ignatius of Loyola, who was born in 1491 and died in 1556. There was a previous Saint Ignatius (of Antioch) also known as Saint Ignatius Theophorus. This one is known for his letters. The dates of his birth and death are uncertain (as well as most of his letters), but it is likely that the reference in the video corresponds to this one (Saint Ignatius of Antioch) , rather than the one depicted (Saint Ignatius of Loyola), who founded the Jesuits in 1540.--unquote
-----quote--- There was a previous Saint Ignatius (of Antioch) also known as Saint Ignatius Theophorus.--unquote
------St. Ignatius of Antioch, also called Ignatius Theophoros (Greek: “God Bearer”), (died c. 110, Rome; Western feast day October 17; Eastern feast day December 20), bishop of Antioch, Syria (now in Turkey), known mainly from seven highly regarded letters that he wrote during a trip to Rome, as a prisoner condemned to be executed for his beliefs. He was apparently eager to counteract the teachings of two groups-the Judaizers, who did not accept the authority of the New Testament, and the docetists, who held that Christ’s sufferings and death were apparent but not real. The letters have often been cited as a source of knowledge of the Christian church at the beginning of the 2nd century.
-----
cool bro
@@mitchellosmer1293 The first Ignatius sounds MUCH more sincere than Loyola, who founded the abominable jesuit order.
Ignatius of Antioch was probably a sincere Christian, and not corrupted by the papacy, since Roman Catholicism did not begin until Constantine legislated it as the official state religion in AD 313. This is in contrast to the Romanist fable that the popes and the Catholic Church started with Peter.
@@TIJoe-te9qu You are deceived by the false teachers, confusing the word legislated with 'founded'. Constantine legislated the church, meaning he legalized it. Jesus founded it. By the way which sect or denomination you belong to?
@Andrew Patton *R Catholics love tales. Nowhere in the Bible says R Church = Christ's CHurch or the Universal Church or the bride of Christ. Neither does Bible mention the office of bishop of bishops - pope.*
you said
1 Corinthians 1 C dividing the Church as D - M the Body of Christ. Whoever separates himself from the Pope and the Church separates himself from Christ. Christ is not a polygamist; He has no bride except the Catholic Church.
Sorry but the bride of Christ is the born-again believers that follow the teaching of Christ, the word of God, not a manmade dogma.
Clement & Linus 2 popes are in the bibke dufus je div.
Following the suppression of the Bar Kokhba revolt, Jerusalem was rebuilt as a Roman colony under the name of Aelia Capitolina, and the province of Judea was renamed Syria Palaestina, before that it was the land of Israel.
This is exactly why people these days are brazen about starting “religious” organizations. They know eventually it will be accepted. The longer the organization lives, the more obscure it becomes to its future followers and it becomes open to “review”, the unpleasant aspects are rooted out and redacted to bring about a “good” religion. I bet when it was just a sect of Judaism, Christian followers were seen as weird and cult like. But look at it now.
You came too late to the party
The pagans called them "Christians" then as a pejorative expression of ridicule and mockery. Today the world still does not understand, and who cares, faith comes only from God alone, throught his Church!!!
@@robertalkemade989 " only the fool criticizes that which he does not understand"... the intelligent enquires about it!!
77, educated in the Roman Catholic Church by Jesuits, Ursuline nuns, taught the "early church" began the establishment process when Jesus Christ pronounced Peter, the "Rock of the Faith" establishing him as its first head, during the latter part of his 3 year ministry.
An interpretive account of what you would hear in public/government education.
In other words you don't know how to respond.
@@nosuchthing8 There are errors of fact
@@andrewplater1782 like what
As Catholics living in Turkey, we would love to see Turkish subtitles on your videos. There is no youtube channel where we can watch in our language. Therefore, this action you will take will help us a lot.
I’m proud to be catholic apostolic Roman
Augustus 1st emperor ???!!!
Proud to worship Nimrod, Isjtar and Tammuz? Sun worship??? With the Vatican build on pagan grounds, bendes crosses with Yesuah on it, thats not idolotry???....please learn symbolism.
Worshipping Maria at shrines. Pilgrimages, praying beeds, do u need to go on???
@@sean6003 if they start about Trinity of "Jesus is God"........ask them one thing and one thing only....."how many Thrones are there in heaven according to the Bible?"...then Muslims should stop talking. They never answer
@@sean6003 Catholicism and Islam are two sides of the same coin. Watch Walter veith. Although he is creationist, he has a lot of proof by reliable sources. He even gives all sources. I thought the seminar was called total unslaught l- the Islamic connection.
Yesuah was like God on earth because he had lived a sinless life. God is also a title given to judges in those regions. Funny thing is that islam uses Catholic teachings to debunk christianity and reinforce their own religion. While Catholicism is nothing else then the ancient secret religion of Babylon.
@@sean6003 what i also find funny is that Allah is allmighty, but he cant create a son, but Arent we all created to the image of Elohim..
Thank God I now pray in my home to Holy Jesus and was set free from all the vile filthy corruption and child abuse of the Catholic church
Good idea to find a church congregation minister/pastor teachs from the Bible with the purpose of understanding God's word. It is good for believers to gather together in Jesuse's name.
God bless
you should pray to god not jesus
"To appeal to the non-Jews, Paul stripped the gospels of all Jewish characteristics."
Where is that written? When did Paul ever write his gospel account of Jesus' life? We don't have any such record.
I would suggest reading the book ,
" Pagan Christianity " by Frank Viola! He has done an in depth study of Roman Catholicism and its influence on the Protestants!
VERY interested to examine the changes in "Christianity" between 60 A.D. and 325 A.D.!!
@Wendi Lane more than you are willing to accept
Yes, especially since Constantine changed Christianity into the official state religion called Catholicism in 313, and passed the first mandatory Sunday observance laws in 321, contrary to the 7th day Sabbath observed by Jesus, Paul, the rest of the apostles, the Gentiles, and of course the Jews as well.
@deanashcraft1631 Yes, but here's the thing about the bible, though.... it's all made up. There's no reason to believe that it's God's word, and if you read it objectively then it's easy to see how there's no possibility way a perfect, all knowing all loving God had anything to do with it.
The changes to Christianity after the apostolic period are illustrated graphically in Revelation 13 and 17, Daniel 7.24,25, and 2 thess 2. These all predicted the uprising of the little horn, beast, man of sin, son of perdition, that wicked, beast, antichrist, and great whore of Babylon. Sadly, all these pointed to what we know today as the PAPACY, the apostate power of all time.
@@jeffdoyle1227 You're entitled to your (misinformed) opinion, but there's every reason for countless millions to disagree with you. Like many opinions in comment sections, you have stated your opinion as ironclad fact, but backed it with nothing.
My guy just started with professing nestorianism 😅 . If you want to discuss your opening statement please inform me in a reply
He definitely didn’t explain it correctly
Paul wrote his (verified) letters many years before the first of the Gospels - so to say he "Stripped the Gospels of their Jewish roots" is anachronistic.
ALSO, Paul was and remained, till his death, a Jew and, at least some scholars, use that as a lens to explore his writings.
Good point
What do you mean by Jew?
Paul was an Israelite of the tribe of Benjamin.
If Paul was always a Jew, then Catholic's who leave the Catholic church are always Catholic's. Which is true anyway because the Catholic Baptism leaves a indelible mark, which cannot be changed or erased. So if the Catholic leaves the Catholic church his Baptism remains intact. He does not lose his Catholic Baptism if Rebaptised he still retains his original Baptism. So Catholic's who leave the Catholic church will be purged of their dislike and disbelief, and some may be in Purgatory until the End of Time.
Paul may have functioned like St John the Baptist getting the gentiles prepared to know Jesus and repent. He claims only to have baptized Onesemose ( who later became a bishop). He admonishes about not receiving the Body and Blood of Jesus without acknowledging the fact, but he may not have been part of the priesthood to change the bread and wine into Christ's True Presence.
The Concrete Confessional blog, whose author was raised Roman Catholic, just dropped an article called "Why This Atheist Is Headed Back to Church." Very interesting reading no matter which side of the fence you're on.
Ancient people living under Kings, Dictators used them as a template for God - hence all the -
Get down on our knees, beg, grovel, blindly obey, sing only his praises etc
Simple primitive people with little knowledge of the world envisioned an afterlife that was similar to the real world that they lived in - a King like God sitting on his throne in the Heavens, Heaven is his kingdom and only those who believe and support the "Dear Loving Master" are allowed in. The rest left to suffer
In today's world that would be like living in Russia or North Korea
The top Gods in the 21st century are Putin, Kim Jong Un!
This "Atheist" is a fool reduced down to praying to a Putin!
Wow Jesus seemed to be a very cool guy
He was everything good, cool included and to a divine extent
Jesus was sound, he was a socialist.
@@mjramirez6008 He was very likely totally made up and a fraud by zealots of the church.
Question: "Are Catholic beliefs and practices biblical?"
Answer: The issue concerning any church and its practices should be "Is this Biblical?" If a teaching is Biblical (taken in context), it should be embraced. If it is not, it should be rejected. God is more interested in whether a church is doing His will and obeying His Word than whether it can trace a line of succession back to Jesus' apostles. Jesus was very concerned about abandoning the Word of God to follow the traditions of men (Mark 7:7). Traditions are not inherently invalid-there are some good and valuable traditions. Again, the issue must be whether a doctrine, practice, or tradition is Biblical. How then does the Roman Catholic Church compare with the teachings of the Word of God?
Salvation: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that salvation is by baptismal regeneration and is maintained through the Catholic sacraments unless a willful act of sin is committed that breaks the state of sanctifying grace. The Bible teaches that we are saved by grace which is received through simple faith (Ephesians 2:8-9), and that good works are the result of a change of the heart wrought in salvation (Ephesians 2:10; 2 Corinthians 5:17) and the fruit of that new life in Christ (John 15).
Assurance of salvation: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that salvation cannot be guaranteed or assured. 1 John 5:13 states that the letter of 1 John was written for the purpose of assuring believers of the CERTAINTY of their salvation.
Good Works: The Roman Catholic Church states that Christians are saved by meritorious works (beginning with baptism) and that salvation is maintained by good works (receiving the sacraments, confession of sin to a priest, etc.) The Bible states that Christians are saved by grace through faith, totally apart from works (Titus 3:5; Ephesians 2:8-9; Galatians 3:10-11; Romans 3:19-24).
Baptism: In the New Testament baptism is ALWAYS practiced AFTER saving faith in Christ. Baptism is not the means of salvation; it is faith in the Gospel that saves (1 Corinthians 1:14-18; Romans 10:13-17). The Roman Catholic Church teaches baptismal regeneration of infants, a practice never found in Scripture. The only possible hint of infant baptism in the Bible that the Roman Catholic Church can point to is that the whole household of the Philippian jailer was baptized in Acts 16:33. However, the context nowhere mentions infants. Acts 16:31 declares that salvation is by faith. Paul spoke to all of the household in verse 32, and the whole household believed (verse 34). This passage only supports the baptism of those who have already believed, not of infants.
Prayer: The Roman Catholic Church teaches Catholics to not only pray to God, but also to petition Mary and the saints for their prayers. Contrary to this, we are taught in Scripture to only pray to God (Matthew 6:9; Luke 18:1-7).
Priesthood: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that there is a distinction between the clergy and the "lay people," whereas the New Testament teaches the priesthood of all believers (1 Peter 2:9).
Sacraments: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that a believer is infused with grace upon reception of the sacraments. Such teaching is nowhere found in Scripture.
Confession: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that unless a believer is hindered, the only way to receive the forgiveness of sins is by confessing them to a priest. Contrary to this, Scripture teaches that confession of sins is to be made to God (1 John 1:9).
Mary: The Roman Catholic Church teaches, among other things, that Mary is the Queen of Heaven, a perpetual virgin, and the co-redemptress who ascended into heaven. In Scripture, she is portrayed as an obedient, believing servant of God, who became the mother of Jesus. None of the other attributes mentioned by the Roman Catholic Church have any basis in the Bible. The idea of Mary being the co-redemptress and another mediator between God and man is not only extra-biblical (found only outside of Scripture), but is also unbiblical (contrary to Scripture). Acts 4:12 declares that Jesus is the only redeemer. 1 Timothy 2:5 proclaims that Jesus is the only mediator between God and men.
Many other examples could be given.
These issues alone clearly identify the Catholic Church as being unbiblical. Every Christian denomination has traditions and practices that are not explicitly based on Scripture. That is why Scripture must be the standard of Christian faith and practice. The Word of God is always true and reliable. The same cannot be said of church tradition. Our guideline is to be: "What does Scripture say?" (Romans 4:3; Galatians 4:30; Acts 17:11). 2 Timothy 3:16-17 declares, "All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting, and training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work."
Jesus is the best!!!!
@Stephan Terblanche *Too bad. You dont even read the Bible. Romans 14 Col 2 does mention believers having disputes on doctrines. They did not believe in exactly the same things. You are wrong once again.*
*After the Apostles, churches went independent. They had their own local councils, their own leaders, their own local canons. You see? You do not know anything.*
you said
The churches referred to in the Bible believed the same things. They were not independent denominations that refused to have anything to do with each other. D
True. The council of Jerusalem in Acts literally discusses differences between Jewish Christians and Gentile Christians... aka, denominations.
I was hoping to hear the Coptic church mentioned, but am glad to learn that Christianity started as part of Judaism at the time.
Christianity is the fulfillment of Judaism. Has nothing whatsoever to do with Romes Catholic Church. It is Christ Himself that builds His body the church.
@@georgebentonjr3876Catholic and Orthodox are the first Christians...
You have the wrong St. Ignatus in the video . When talking about St. Ignatius of Antioch, you show a picture of St. Ignatius of Lyola.
I didn't know they had cameras back then. Thanks for the info. smh
There are plenty of early Christian writings that were not canonized from the first and second century that show the traditions existed long before Constantine. These writings supplement the canonized writings that became the New Testament, but were not seen as inspired writing until the second century.
Book of Acts lays out the formation of the church and it was written long before Constantine.
To be fair the entire religion is shaped around what they chose to believe is canon so really between all denominations everyone just picks and chooses their interpretation. The books have no real sources and they have been modified more times than anyone could actually know so how important are the rules really? I think it is easy to know right from wrong and any good god would be more worried about how you treat each other than the semantics games humans played with doctrine they wrote for said god.
@@0bservationis1 the early Christian writings they identified were the most likely true sources from the disciples for the gospels based on texts that were known to be produced by the apostle or one of their direct disciples (each author had a known style). Even though they identified them as inspired writings in the second century they spread throughout the known world with different scribes copying the manuscripts they had at their disposal.
The church realized that there was changes being made to some of the manuscripts that were not in other versions. So they realized they had an issue. By the fourth century they collected a copy of the manuscripts from all areas and began to compare all the inspired Christian writing we know of as the New Testament. Through comparing thousands of scribed versions they were able to see how the text was changed in one region that didn’t match what other regions had. By analyzing each of the variations they were able to construct the canon by rooting out the variances. This became cannon and the texts are stored in Latin. An unchanging version of language. The oldest manuscripts they have are preserved and the fragments are compared to modern interpretations. Even the Dead Sea scrolls when they were recovered were compared with the cannon to see if they matched and they do.
What is left now with updating of the language to reflect modern language variations to make them easier to read. These are always compared to the original text to ensure accuracy.
“The way” or what was known simply as the church practiced what is described in the Bible. Breaking bread, fellowship, worship, praying, teachings or sermons(reading of scripts), fasting. After Christ gnostics and others perverted the words and fables of apocryphal nonsense. The canonized books were carefully chosen by what was taught and considered true, god inspired for the years that followed the Christ. Ignatius spoke of the Catholic Church as an adjective not a noun or church religion. Constantine a high pagan priest added to the teachings to form the RCC. Mixed paganism with Christianity to appease the pagans and have them convert comfortably. Catholicism has added traditions, rituals, practices and other unbiblical teachings making it not Christianity anymore. The first church in Jerusalem is nothing, night and day of what the RCC church is.
@@Everykneebows this is ignorance of what the early Christian’s wrote. The church fathers writings up to 4th century do follow Universal church traditions.
From the lords day to confession to baptism to alms giving to anointing the sick to apostolic succession to the pope.
What is a twisted version is protestantism who have zero history and makes up their own non-biblical traditions that are not supported by what the church fathers practiced
Correct, and Acts sure doesn't include any popes, Mary worship, purgatory, indulgences, praying to dead saints, relics, pilgrimages, priests, confession boxes to drunken priests who may be molesters, Sunday sacredness., etc, etc.
Good old Constantine sure put his pagan spin on things.
The founding faith began in the year, 33, during the last supper, by the Christ. This is my body. this is my blood. Holy communion.
@@BaldwinBay exquisite! 🐝 Sounds like vampires were involved. 🐝
That’s the claim. Is there any reasonable evidence to support this?
@@teresaamanfu7408 no evidence .
Catholicism has not showed us to be a christ like institution . How many crusades , wars , corruption, and executions of people in the name of the church has happened throughout in history . How about all the fraud The priest and popes have done .
@@teresaamanfu7408 if it were true, the question would be, what happened?
2:54 gives the order of the Gospels as Mark, Matthew, Luke, and John. A modern theory, but the traditional order has good historical testimony, as early as Irenaeus of Lyon, a student of Polycarp of Smyrna, who was a student of the Apostle John. Can you imagine the grandchildren of soldiers of the American Revolution not knowing who wrote the Declaration of Independence or that it came before The Constitution? That is about the time gap here three generations.
Well what do you think accounts for the difference? I assume it’s modern people looking at which book appears to come from which, like Luke and Matthew appear to come from Mark and Q, for example. I assume they’re using the Greek texts? I dunno what they’re looking for specifically.
@@rxw5520 Q is a modern theory, very questionable, NO manuscript evidence.
@@llla_german_ewoklll6413 You seem to be saying what I'm saying in your first sentence. Your 2nd sentence seems to disagree but I don't see your point. On your 3rd sentence, The gap I speak of is 3 generations and I list the 3 generations I am talking about.
@@glstka5710 Looking back at your comment, I misread it. I apologize for the misunderstanding. But I will say that is only a two generational gap. If we speak of Irenaeus, he is two places removed from John. If there was one more before Irenaeus, and after Polycarp or John, then it would be a 3 generation gap.
@@llla_german_ewoklll6413 I wasn't counting John as the 0th generation. John 1st, Polycar 2nd, Irenaeus 3rd. looks like we basically agree.
I am a Catholic only, my biggest wish is for world peace, no war, no Fighting,Ask Jesus to bless mankind around the world, be safe and happy, Amen. ⛪💐🧡
Question: "Are Catholic beliefs and practices biblical?"
Answer: The issue concerning any church and its practices should be "Is this Biblical?" If a teaching is Biblical (taken in context), it should be embraced. If it is not, it should be rejected. God is more interested in whether a church is doing His will and obeying His Word than whether it can trace a line of succession back to Jesus' apostles. Jesus was very concerned about abandoning the Word of God to follow the traditions of men (Mark 7:7). Traditions are not inherently invalid-there are some good and valuable traditions. Again, the issue must be whether a doctrine, practice, or tradition is Biblical. How then does the Roman Catholic Church compare with the teachings of the Word of God?
Salvation: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that salvation is by baptismal regeneration and is maintained through the Catholic sacraments unless a willful act of sin is committed that breaks the state of sanctifying grace. The Bible teaches that we are saved by grace which is received through simple faith (Ephesians 2:8-9), and that good works are the result of a change of the heart wrought in salvation (Ephesians 2:10; 2 Corinthians 5:17) and the fruit of that new life in Christ (John 15).
Assurance of salvation: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that salvation cannot be guaranteed or assured. 1 John 5:13 states that the letter of 1 John was written for the purpose of assuring believers of the CERTAINTY of their salvation.
Good Works: The Roman Catholic Church states that Christians are saved by meritorious works (beginning with baptism) and that salvation is maintained by good works (receiving the sacraments, confession of sin to a priest, etc.) The Bible states that Christians are saved by grace through faith, totally apart from works (Titus 3:5; Ephesians 2:8-9; Galatians 3:10-11; Romans 3:19-24).
Baptism: In the New Testament baptism is ALWAYS practiced AFTER saving faith in Christ. Baptism is not the means of salvation; it is faith in the Gospel that saves (1 Corinthians 1:14-18; Romans 10:13-17). The Roman Catholic Church teaches baptismal regeneration of infants, a practice never found in Scripture. The only possible hint of infant baptism in the Bible that the Roman Catholic Church can point to is that the whole household of the Philippian jailer was baptized in Acts 16:33. However, the context nowhere mentions infants. Acts 16:31 declares that salvation is by faith. Paul spoke to all of the household in verse 32, and the whole household believed (verse 34). This passage only supports the baptism of those who have already believed, not of infants.
Prayer: The Roman Catholic Church teaches Catholics to not only pray to God, but also to petition Mary and the saints for their prayers. Contrary to this, we are taught in Scripture to only pray to God (Matthew 6:9; Luke 18:1-7).
Priesthood: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that there is a distinction between the clergy and the "lay people," whereas the New Testament teaches the priesthood of all believers (1 Peter 2:9).
Sacraments: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that a believer is infused with grace upon reception of the sacraments. Such teaching is nowhere found in Scripture.
Confession: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that unless a believer is hindered, the only way to receive the forgiveness of sins is by confessing them to a priest. Contrary to this, Scripture teaches that confession of sins is to be made to God (1 John 1:9).
Mary: The Roman Catholic Church teaches, among other things, that Mary is the Queen of Heaven, a perpetual virgin, and the co-redemptress who ascended into heaven. In Scripture, she is portrayed as an obedient, believing servant of God, who became the mother of Jesus. None of the other attributes mentioned by the Roman Catholic Church have any basis in the Bible. The idea of Mary being the co-redemptress and another mediator between God and man is not only extra-biblical (found only outside of Scripture), but is also unbiblical (contrary to Scripture). Acts 4:12 declares that Jesus is the only redeemer. 1 Timothy 2:5 proclaims that Jesus is the only mediator between God and men.
Many other examples could be given.
These issues alone clearly identify the Catholic Church as being unbiblical. Every Christian denomination has traditions and practices that are not explicitly based on Scripture. That is why Scripture must be the standard of Christian faith and practice. The Word of God is always true and reliable. The same cannot be said of church tradition. Our guideline is to be: "What does Scripture say?" (Romans 4:3; Galatians 4:30; Acts 17:11). 2 Timothy 3:16-17 declares, "All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting, and training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work."
I find it interesting that for so many the bible is a fact. I feel like the true power of the book is lost when is used as a fact filled book instead of a way of teaching philosophy to the lower classes.
....meant for suckers?
God chose the absurd, poor and simple to confound thec erudites and upper class like you!!!
The Bible is a literary work that was translated by Martin Luther into a literal work in Latin.
Previously, St Jerome also added his own agenda against women,such as, the Immaculate Conception bit., and womens removal from the priesthood into subservience.
You know, as little as 300 years ago you could have been burned at the stake for expressing that belief.
@@judylandry302 Please try to hide your profound ignorance if you have no intention of remedying it.
A very subjective and naturalistic view of Jesus' life and mission.
No offense i think you miss the point that jesus teachings and his apostels teachings got compromised by romans and not just any the same one that had authority in that time period and also was persecuting jesus at that time. They even made a counsel to establish the trinity 300 years after jesus so if no previous prophet preached the trinity and jesus nor his disciples did it and the catholic church that has ties to roman pagions declared what the word of gods is then our salvation is based on flaws
@@paulruswalrus ok I will do it but how do we as Christian’s and none Christian’s know that the KJV is the word of jesus or given jesus stamps and approval why do humans that are living after Jesus just need to believe that he died of our sins to find salvation and the ppl of the Old Testament needed to follow 10 commandments there is two explanations here one is that god was unfair to the ppl that lived before Jesus and made it easy for us living after Jesus the second is the right answer because god is consistent perfect and justly ppl changed Jesus message why to make life easy for them who change the not every Christian they lived but the ones with power you look into video you will see that they Christians in power where not god fearing men they compromised the religion to benefit them so they could maintain power they had
@@subeerbarkhdle2341 We have thousands of Greek manuscripts that date before the Council of Nicaea. That is how we know that the word was not altered. Modern translation are reliable Bc they are based off of the earliest manuscripts, and like I said, there are thousands that have survived. Also, the council of Nicaea was to discuss the deity of Christ. A vast majority of the Churches already viewed Him as eternal and so did the Church Fathers before them. These men were not looking for power. It was noted by one man at the council of Nicaea that it looked like an army of martyrs had been gathered together. Most of these men had survived the persecution of the previous Roman leaders and many were missing limbs or wounded from torture. They did not care what the Emperor thought. They were all willing to die for the truth. I believe the one that started the idea that Jesus was not eternal was a man from Alexandria.
Since there's no actual objective evidence he ever existed any view would have to be subjective.
@@MJ-we9vu unironically
I’m going through chemo for breast cancer now. The thinning has just started and it was a huge fear for me. I’ve come to terms with it and can’t wait to see my oncologist and wear my “My oncologist does my hair” t shirt to that appointment. 😂
God bless you and you will get through this!! Amen
God be with you
🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻Prayers for you
🙏🏻🙌🏻
I had cancer in my neck twice. They had to cut the main facial nerve to take the tumour out so half my face is paralyzed and my vision is affected, but 25 years later, I’m still here. I hope you will be too.
It’s a deeply painful and complex issue. Many people feel that the actions of individuals should not define the entire institution, especially when those actions are so contrary to its teachings. It’s understandable to feel that these abuses are damaging the church from within.
The carpenter from Galilee would be disgusted to see what has been done in his friends name in Rome. Peter would also be disgusted to see marble and gold everywhere. It's like a false kingdom more suited to the devil.
I know it is hard brother, to see money used and not spent on what we deem more important. However, people poure dtheir lives into building these places. Jesus will know their act of faith and appericate it if it is a true act. just like He did when the women poured expensive anointed oii upon His feet, if money be spent let it be for the glory of God my King,
@@alexanodeworthy6589 You are comparing the building of a gathering place to the actions of Mary when she anointed Christ? You cannot be serious... ??
@@krisgangwer3796The commenter is making an analogy between the sinful woman of Luke’s gospel to people who build beautiful churches dedicated to Christ. Sinners who bow before Christ and express a gift. Christ did not kick the woman off of him. She was repaying him in the most appropriate way she knew how.
@@WhistleMeThis First of all, she had a name: Mary. Second of all, I am very weary of posters who try to explain things because they think women are too stupid to understand. What Mary did by anointing Jesus this way is not comparable to any cathedral the Catholics have built out of their EXCESS!
Go read Matthew 23.... pray and ask for discernment regarding the RCC but I am done here. Know what the real difference is between Mary and the RCC? He told her to "Go and sin no more" and she followed him all of her days...
the RCC? No, not so much.
@@krisgangwer3796 do you even know the history of how some of these buildings were built? It is comparable. Some people dedicate their lives to these places of worship just to give people a beautiful place to pray and to give God the house He deserves. They literally dedicated blood, sweat, and tears. Moreover, Mary might have sinned again and there is no proof she didn't. God's mercy is bigger than our sins. Moreover, God calls sinners so saying the RCC is full of sinners does nothing to prove it wrong. Jesus was in the company of sinners. Thus, Jesus is in the company of RCC and all Christians who call on His name. Im sorry that you dont understand the Church but you cant say you know the intent of why these churches on made. and to say they are inherently bad goes aganist there very purpose of being made. a house divide aganist itself does not stand. moreover these people didnt use the money for themsleves but wanted to give it to the community of believers and God.
The words "Eternal Son" are not in the Bible, and John did not say it!
Micah 6:2 shows Jesus is eternal. Has been "from of old, from everlasting" The word "everlasting" here is from the Hebrew and means "the days of eternity". Or was someone else to be born in Bethlehem to be Ruler in Israel?
Micah 6:2
New American Standard Bible
"Listen, you mountains, to the indictment by the Lord,
And you enduring foundations of the earth,
Because the Lord has a case against His people;
And He will dispute with Israel." This is God the Father speaking. It says nothing of an "Eternal Son."
The term "Eternal Son" is a Greek philosophic idea invented in post-Biblical times in the 3rd through 5th centuries AD. It is not a Hebrew or a Christian Apostolic term. You cannot prove that the term "Eternal Son" existed before the Church Counsel of Nicia in 325 AD: More than 300 years after the birth of Christ.
This is Platonic-Christianity to believe Jesus was eternal and that he is God. (Carefully read Luke 1:35): He was created in the womb of Mary through a biological miracle, and the verse says for this very reason (the miracle) he shall be called "The Son of God." No other reason can be supplanted or substituted for "Why" he is called the Son of God.
The Apostles knew nothing of an "Eternal Son," and the Bible does not teach it. It is only the school of Plato (which lasted 900 years) and sophism which has set the Church into delusionary false doctrines! Jesus is the Son of God, not the Eternal Son!
@@geraldhancock6208 Sry.I meant Micah 5:2. My fingers are too big for this typing...
@@davidstarr6604 Not only did God foreknow Jesus Christ before the foundation of the world, but God foreknew each of us who follow Jesus Christ: This foreknowledge of us does not make us eternal.
"And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose. For
those God foreknew 1, he also predestined to be conformed to the
image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many
brothers. And those he predestined, he also called; those he
called, he also justified; those he justified, he also glorified" [i.e.
he gave them glory in intention, not yet in reality] (Rom. 8:28-30;
cf. Eph. 1:3-10).
"Praise be to the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has
blessed us in the heavenlies with every spiritual blessing in Christ.
For he chose us in him before the creation of the world to be
holy and blameless in his sight. In love, he predestined us to be
adopted as his sons through Jesus Christ, in accordance with his
pleasure and will - to the praise of his glorious grace, which he
has freely given us in the one he loves. In him we have redemption
through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, in accordance with the
riches of God’s grace that he lavished on us with all wisdom and
understanding. And he made known to us the mystery of his will
[the mystery of the Kingdom] according to his good pleasure
which he purposed in Christ, to be put into effect when the times
will have reached their fulfillment - to bring all things in heaven
and on earth together in Christ" (Eph. 1:3-10).
1 Jesus himself was foreknown (1 Pet. 1:20).
"But when the right time came, God sent his Son, born of a woman,
born under the Law to ransom those who are under the Law in order
that we might receive the full status of sons. To show that you are
sons, God sent the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, “Abba,
Father.” So you are no longer a slave, but a son; and if a son, an heir
also, by God’s own act" (Gal. 4:4-7; Translator’s Translation).
"God has saved us, and called us with a holy calling, not according to
our works, but according to his own purpose and grace which was
granted to us in Christ Jesus from all eternity, but now has been
revealed by the appearing of our Savior Christ Jesus, who abolished
death and brought life and immortality to light through the Gospel"
(2 Tim. 1:9, 10).
"In the hope of the life of the age to come which God who cannot
lie promised before aionion times but at the proper time manifested,
namely his word in the proclamation with which I was
entrusted" (Titus 1:2, 3a).
Jesus is not the Eternal Son. Being foreknown in eternity past is an issue within the mind of God. He foreknew him, just as He also foreknew us in God's mind, eons ago.
@@geraldhancock6208 That is not the same. We are human beings. Jesus is God the Son. Scripture is very clear that Jesus has always existed, and that we have eternal life in Him. Mary conceived by the Holy Spirit.
Very interesting subject to learn and digest well.
I wonder why the authhordox church in Ethiopia survived the Catholic establishment
Especially if uncredentialled idiots like the creator of this video post factually inaccurate information.....
You have to look at the original language the gospels were written in. Which is in Greek. "You are Peter (petros = stone) and on this rock (petra = rock or boulder) I will build my church." Jesus is the Rock and chief corner stone.
Mathew was written in Hebrew
St.Luke recorded from the direct experience of those around Jesus,like his Mother Mary.
nope. If "Luke" talked to Mary he would have said so. He didn't name ANY of his sources. BTW the author of Luke is anonymous.
@@scambammer6102revisionism is unbecoming.
@Andrew Patton *R Catholics love to tw Scriptures. James was addressing Jewish Christians who were already saved. He was addressing their Practical Christian Living.*
*Salvation is Not By Works (Faith Alone). Christian Living is by Works (Not Faith Alone)*
you said
The only place in the Bible "faith alone" is written is in James, with a "not" in front of it.
Very true. Seems too many confuse salvation with living a Christian life (after salvation).
@@joycegreer9391 *Yes indeed.*
@@joycegreer9391 no one can be sure of one's salvation..but in order for salvation to be at least possible one has to be within the institutional Church of the Catholic Church and be baptized within it..and then one has to live an authentic Christian life, that is the Catholic life, the only true Christian life, by reception of the Sacraments within the Church, the only avenue and conduit, through the hands of the priest, of grace..also by doing good works, fasting, penance, praying for the Holy souls within Purgatory, and gaining indulgences..even with all of this one cannot be assured of salvation, but without, we do know it is an absolute impossibly..I will pray for your soul.
@@davidniedjaco9869 Hahaha. Totally not true. RCC mythology, manmade religious system, totally unbiblical. Of course RCath can't be sure of salvation; that's the way their system was designed. All RCath is promised is purgatory. Don't know why anyone stays in that system. You do need prayers!
Those of us who have total faith and trust in Jesus (sola fide) can be sure of our salvation by the promises in God's Word (sola scriptura).
No RCATH will answer this question: where is your church in Revelation?
@@davidniedjaco9869 wow. Do you actually read scripture? No you do not. I can answer this question for you because of what you said. If you actually read you'd know you are bound to obey God's 10 commandments. Therefore catholism is blasphemy in its highest. It's built on the foundation of Roman paganism by adding Mary and saints. By calling a worldly man holy and father when scripture says only 1 is holy and call Noone father on earth. Your worldly priest claims to be God almighty himself and forgive sin. The vow of celibacy is not written in scripture and is contradiction TO GOD. GOD MADE WOMAN FOR MAN . GOD DIDNT MAKE WOMAN EVIL ONLY SEXUAL IMMORALITY. The way the priest holds the (round wafer) in a ancient rome and Egyptian and babylon sun worship manner. The fact you worship God on Sunday SUN-DAY WAS ROMES DAY TO WORSHIP THE SUN NOT THE SUN.. ANDIT WAS DONE TO DECIEVE US. SATURDAY WAS THE TRADITIONAL DAY. THE DAY GOD SAID TO KEEP HOLY AND LET IT BE A SIGN WE ACKNOWLEDGE HIM AS GOD CREATOR OF HEAVEN AND EARTH. you guys create false images . Idol worship. Blasphemy, pray for your own soul. Or go read 20 min of 1 gospel. Hebrews 10:26 if anyone deliberately sins after recieving the SPIRIT OF TRUTH THEY NO LONGER HAVE THE SACRIFICE FOR SIN JOHN 3:4-11 Everyone who makes a practice of sinning also practices lawlessness; sin is lawlessness. You know that he appeared to take away sins, and in him there is no sin. No one who abides in him keeps on sinning; no one who keeps on sinning has either seen him or known him. Little children, let no one deceive you. Whoever practices righteousness is righteous, as he is righteous. Whoever makes a practice of sinning is of the devil, for the devil has been sinning from the beginning. The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the works of the devil. ...
John 5:18
We know that everyone who has been born of God does not keep on sinning, but he who was born of God protects him, and the evil one does not touch him
Timothy 1:7 For God gave us a spirit not of fear but of power and love and (self-control.)
Corinthians 5:11
But now I am writing to you not to associate with anyone who bears the name of brother if he is guilty of sexual immorality or greed, or is an idolater, reviler, drunkard, or swindler-not even to eat with such a one
Acts 17:30 The times of ignorance God overlooked, but now he commands all people everywhere to repent
Luke 6:46 Why do you call me ‘Lord, Lord,’ and not do what I tell you?
James 3:1-18
Mathew 5:48 You therefore must be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect.
John 3:3 Jesus answered him, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God.”
Collossians 3:1-25If then you have been raised with Christ, seek the things that are above, where Christ is, seated at the right hand of God. Set your minds on things that are above, not on things that are on earth. For you have died, and your life is hidden with Christ in God. When Christ who is your life appears, then you also will appear with him in glory. Put to death therefore what is earthly in you: sexual immorality, impurity, passion, evil desire, and covetousness, which is idolatry. ...
Hosea 4:6 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge; because you have rejected knowledge, I reject you from being a priest to me. And since you have forgotten the law of your God, I also will forget your children.
Thessalonians 3:14
John 8:34 Jesus answered them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, everyone who commits sin is a slave to sin.
First The Romans loudly despised Jesus Christ in life, Crucified him in front of his friends, family, followers, and foes then Claimed that their Church's rules, teachings, text and beliefs were the only true, legitimate authority regarding Christianity. It's laughable.
You literally could not have written a better parody of the scripture if you tried.
How Blasphemous? Lord Strike me if I ever call any man who is not my father, "father". Forgiveness is in the scripture, yet you expect me to (repeatedly) confess my sins and ask a 40-year-old virgin for his forgiveness?
PS!!! Mary... a perpetual virgn? PLEASE! Jesus had four brothers!
May God forgive your blasphemy.
You begin your comment with the word "First" an stated what is true about how the Romans despised Jesus. I begin my comment with the word "Secondly" a few hundred years passed and times changed as they always do. The part about Constantine needing the Christians to prop up his government is most likely true because historians recorded it to be so. A little critical thinking could have saved you from making such a brash statement.
Comparing Roman policy under Augustus Cesar with that of Constantine is like presuming that Kennedy and Nixon are the same because they're both Americans. Administrations and administrative policy can vary wildly depending on who's in charge.
Did Roman Catholics change the Christian Creed established by the early Church? If they changed the beliefs, how can it claim to be the original belief? What does the book of Galations say about this question? What does Orthodox mean? If you study what Orthodox Christianity is, then you will discover that this video reframes reality to suit different teachings.
Interesting in a video about the beginnings of Christianity you use the phrase 'BCE'. So, what happened to change it to today's era? When did BCE stop being BCE and become something else? And what happened to cause this change?
Instead of BC (before Christ) they use BCE (which stands for before common error). The so called government does not want God in the picture. In other words, they are taking our religious freedom away.
I believe that it was changed so as not to offend the Jewish people.
@@charlesdayon8420 I think more like offending atheists.
Why does it say "3 replies" yet shows only 1? Anyway the calendar was changed into our current Gregorian calendar and is actually off by 4 years. Jesus was born in 4 BC. "BC" technically means "before Christ" and (I think) AD means "after death", not sure though cause that don't make sense either. Can anyone confirm what "AD" translates to? Evolutionists like the BCE and CE dates. "Before Common Era" and "Common Era". It leaves Christ out of the calculations of years and away from our calendars.
@@davidstarr6604 AD=Anno Domini. Medieval Latin and means 'in the year of the Lord'.
I find often that all the comments don't show. Don't know what's up with that.
@Quirico mazarin *Most of Ignatius writings were forgeries. In the first place all writings including this does not say R Church = the Universal Church or the Church CHrist founded. You are misled.*
*"catholic" in all writings refers to the Universal Christian Church. Not R Catholic Church. Church has always meant all churches + all believers. Nothing to do with Church of Rome (current r Catholic Church).*
you said
1st post apostle historical extant writing by one of the disciples St.Ignatious of Antioch 107 A.D .
I say to you, you are Kepha (a small stone), but I will build My Church upon this Rock, Myself.
That is the meaning. Because He is the Rock.
Do you mean that Jesus is the "rock"?
Peter is the rock
Yes! Jesus is the rock, not Peter, who is definitely not a pope either.
Amen. Jesus is the rock. Why will Jesus built a church based on man for Jesus knew man and did not consider their testimony. So it's affirm that Jesus is the rock.
@@johnyang1420 Peter is only the rock to Romanists, because they need to fabricate a tie to Peter being the supposed "1st pope" 😂. Otherwise, the papacy has no way to claim connection to the apostolic church.
It's all a giant lie, as Jesus never appointed ANY pope to sit as God in the temple of the Vatican, claiming to be a vicarious Christ. Peter would NEVER do that.
Great job for 11 minutes 😃👍🏻🙏🏻
Thank you for the video here in New York City watching 2023 8:23 a.m. Wednesday March 22
Here in New York City watching 2023 9:21 p.m. Thursday September 21
@@nadiaestrella2153 LMFAO🤣 thank you for reading my comment here in New York City reading yours Friday September 22nd 1:16 p.m. drinking coffee and walking on 14th Street Union Square heading for the train station to disappear LOL🤣
@@timeisapathwalkingtounderstandI’m watching the video and reading you comment here in Luxembourg, Europe at 1:50am Thursday March 7th needing to get some sleep but chuckling reading your comments. Much love ❤
The Church began at Pentecost
Mat 16: 17-19.
@Andrew Patton *Any mention of "catholic" in any writings does not refer to R Catholic Church at all. "catholic" was always applied to the Universal Christian Church. Not R Catholic Church.*
*Most of Ignatius writings were spurious according to historians and scholars. You are using spurious writings as doctrines?*
you said
St. Ignatius of Antioch spoke of the Catholic Church in the early 2nd century.
@@tagalogstories-hs4yr *So interesting. Dont you know Irenaeus Against Heresies was another f - ry?*
you said
LOL...you so funny.... Not only St. Ignatius of Antioch...We even have St. Irenaeus of Lyon (180 A.D.) who believe in the CATHOLIC title and the Roman Bishop succession....
ST. IRENAEUS of LYON
"The 🛑Catholic Church possesses one and the same faith throughout the whole world, as we have already said."
- (ST. IRENAEUS of LYON, Against Heresies , Book 1, Chapter 10)
ST. IRENAEUS of LYON
"But as it would take up too much space, in such a volume as this, to enumerate the successions of all the churches, by pointing out that tradition which the 🛑greatest, and most ancient, and universally known, 🛑Church of Rome - founded and constituted by the two most glorious Apostles🛑 Peter and Paul - holds from the Apostles, and the faith announced to all men, which, through the successions of (her) bishops, has come down to us, we confound all those who in any way, whether through self-complacency or vain-glory, or blindness and evil opinion, assemble otherwise than as behooves them.
For to this Church, on account of more powerful principality, it is necessary that every church, who wishes to remain faithful, resort, in which has been preserved that tradition which is from Apostles."
- (ST. IRENAEUS of LYON, Against Heresies, Book 3, Chapter 3)
@@tagalogstories-hs4yr *So you prove the claims by 2 f - ries?*
@@tagalogstories-hs4yr *You do not know? That's why you are D.*
"Against Heresies" attributed to Irenaeus is a most blatant f -ry or false attribution.
In addition, "Against Heresies" destroys the chronology of the Pauline Epistles.
Irenaeus was a supposed Presbyter and Bishop of the Church of Lyons
In the Church of Lyons, it was taught that Jesus was CRUCIFIED when an OLD man in the reign of Claudius or about 20 years AFTER the 15th year of Tiberius c 49 CE.
The Pauline Corpus was UNKNOWN to the Church of Lyons since a Pauline writer claimed or implied he PREACHED Christ Crucified since the time of King Aretas c 37-41 CE.
It is virtually impossible to TEACH in the CHURCH of Lyons that Jesus was crucified in the time of Claudius if they had knowledge and the HISTORY of Jesus and Paul.
"Against Heresies" must be the work of MULTIPLE authors.
The Canonised Gospels and Pauline Corpus are all LATE writings fabricated AFTER "Against Heresies" 2.22 or AFTER at least c 175-180 CE.
"Against Heresies" 2.22 is a two-thousand word argument to attempt to show Jesus Christ was about 50 years old when he was crucified.
"Against Heresies" 2.22 does NOT appear to be the product of "scribal error" since the author claimed John the disciple did TEACH that Jesus was about fifty years old.
And NOT only that, the Gospel and ALL those conversant with John did claim that Jesus was about 50 years old when he suffered.
Let me recap the claims of "Against Heresies" 2.22. at the crucifixion of Jesus
1. John the disciple PREACHED Jesus was about 50 YEARS OLD.
2. The Gospel stated Jesus was about 50 years old.
3. All those who were conversant with John did admit they were told Jesus was about 50 years old.
There is one thing that NOW must be established.
When was Jesus born according to "Against Heresies"?
The author of 'AH' (Against Heresies") used gLuke to claim Jesus was about to be 30 years old at the Baptism.
you said
f??...who says it's f??....even Scholars relied on St. Irenaeus of Lyon in finding the heretical Gospel of Judas ,which was recently found by archeologists...
It was first mentioned and CONDEMNED by ST. Irenaeus of Lyon and now, archeologists found the Gospel of Judas... 🙄
@@tagalogstories-hs4yr *Catholic Church contradicts Scriptures in every possible ways!*
1. Catholics say Mary was sinless. But BIBLE says Mary offered a sinner's offering. She was a sinner. Bible says Mary needed a Saviour. Lk 2:23-24, Lev 12:6-8, Rom 3:10.
2. Catholics say clergies must be celibate. Yet BIBLE says Peter (supposed R Church first leader) had mother in law. Bible says celibacy is not a qualification for clergies. Mat 8:14-15, Mar 1:30-31, Luk 4:38-39.
3. Catholics say Mary was forever virgin. Yet BIBLE says Jesus had brothers and sisters. Mary was not perpetually virgin. Mk 6:3, Mat 13:55, Mat 27:56, Mar 6:3, Mar 15:40, Mar 15:47.
4. Catholics say confess to R priests in a box. BIBLE says nothing about confessing to priests in a box. Bible says confess to GOD only. 1 John 1:9, Mat 6, Romans 10:9-10.
5. Catholics say drink of the literal blood of Jesus. Yet OT and NT both say do not drink blood. Acts 15, Lev 7:26.
6. Catholics say pray to passed on Mary and "saints". Yet BIBLE says do not contact the dead. NT Church did not record a single case of NT believers asking passed on saints to pray for them. Deut 18:11, Isaiah 8:19.
7. Catholics make and bow down to statues. BIBLE says do not bow down to graven images (statues). Deut 4, Exo 20:4-5.
8. Catholics sprinkles “holy water”. But NT Church of the Bible mentioned nothing about “holy water”. There was no record of any Apostles sprinkling “holy water” on believers. Catholics claimed “holy water” came from OT. Yet Num 5:17 says “holy water” was water used to test adulterous women in OT temple. Hardly the same. Those were for Old Covenant Jews. Not New Testament Christians.
9. Catholics say Peter was pope - bishop of all bishops. Yet BIBLE says Peter was just a leader of the Jerusalem Church. Bible says nothing of the office of bishop of bishops. Gal 2:9, Mat 16:18.
10. Catholics say there is a seat of Peter. Yet BIBLE says nothing about it. Jesus said “not to lord over others”.
11. Catholics has clergy priesthood. Bible says clergy priesthood was done away with in New Testament. There is no clergy priesthood in NT. Heb 7:27, 9:12, 10:10.
12. Catholics preaches Works Salvation (faith + good works + partake R sacraments + submit to R pontiff + be in R Church + devote to Mary = to be saved). Yet Bible says “believe in Jesus to be saved”. Bible says Works Salvation is cursed. Gal 1:8-9. Acts 16:30-31, John 3:16, Romans 10:9-10.
13. Catholics says they must do Penance to atone for their sins. Yet Bible says repent, confess and sins will be forgiven. Catholic Bible changes the word “repentance” in NT into “penance”. Original Greek NT does not use or mean the word penance. Penance = work to atone for sins. Repentance = change of heart. 1 John 1:9, Mat 6.
14. Catholics say Mary went straight to heaven without dying. Yet Bible says nothing about it.
15. Catholics say Islam and Christianity have the same GOD. Yet Islam doesn't believe in death and resurrection of Jesus and Trinity.
R Catholicism is full of contradiction and anti Scriptures. Nothing is more evil than a c--- disguising as Christianity deceiving many.
@@tagalogstories-hs4yr
1. Catholics claim CHURCH refers to Roman Catholic Church. BIBLE says CHURCH refers to all churches. Acts 5:11, Acts 8:1, Mat 16:18. HISTORY tells us Roman Church was just one local Church a member of the Pentarchy.
2. Catholics claim Roman Church was the CHURCH CHRIST founded (First Church) or one true church. BIBLE says First Local Church was Jerusalem Church. Acts 2. Not Roman Catholic Church.
3. Catholics claim there is only One Church. BIBLE mentions both CHURCH and Churches.
“CHURCH” refers to the Body of Christ Eph 5:30, Col 1:18 consisting of all churches. Acts 5:11, Acts 8:1 Mat 16:18.
“Churches” refers to local churches Acts 9:31, Acts 15:41 and believers Romans 16:5, 1 Cor 16:19,
4. Catholics claim to be the first believers. BIBLE says first believers were Jewish Christians. Acts 2, Acts 11:26, NOT roman catholics.
5. Catholics claim Pope is the head of the CHURCH. BIBLE says JESUS is the HEAD OF THE CHURCH. Eph 1:22, Eph 5:23, Col 1:18.
6. Catholics claim outside Roman Church there is NO SALVATION. BIBLE says “apart from Jesus there is NO SALVATION”. Acts 4:12, 1 Cor 3:11.
7. Catholics claim submit to Roman Pontiff to be saved. BIBLE says “apart from Jesus there is NO SALVATION”. Acts 4:12, 1 Cor 3:11.
8. Catholics claim devote to Mary to be saved. BIBLE says “apart from Jesus there is NO SALVATION”. Acts 4:12, 1 Cor 3:11.
9. Catholics claim partake Roman Church sacraments to be saved. BIBLE says “believe in Jesus to be saved”. Acts 16:30-31, John 3:16.
10. Catholics claim Roman Church inherited infallible authority from Peter. BIBLE does not say that in Mat 16 or John 20 or John 21.
11. Catholics claim Roman pontiff inherited infallible authority from Peter. BIBLE does not say that in Mat 16.
12. Catholics claim bishop of ROME = the pope. BIBLE does not say that.
13. Catholics claim there is an office of bishop of bishops/universal bishop/pope. BIBLE does not speak of such an office. History tells us the first bishop of bishops came in AD590-600s.
14. Roman Church has all the false unbiblical clergies - Roman priests, roman cardinals, roman pontiff, monks, nuns, friars, … BIBLE mentions only pastors, teachers, evangelists, prophets, apostles, deacons, bishop, elders. Titus 1:5, Eph 4:11, 1 Tim 3.
15. Roman Church claim its doctrines come from traditions of Apostles. BUT 95% of roman doctrines are Not from traditions of Jesus or Apostles or Scriptures; neither practised by nt Church of the Bible.
According to Eusebius (father of church history) standing up at the council, he proclaimed that the gospels came from the writings if the Essenes. Wether rightly or wrongly, IDNK
They went out from us, *but they were not of us* for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us.
{1 John 2:19}
The church *that is at Babylon* elected together with you, saluteth you; and so doth Marcus my son.
{1 Peter 5:13}
Spotonski !
Correct quotation of 1 Peter 5:13 (NIV) : She who is in Babylon, chosen together with you, sends you her greetings, and so does my son Mark.
@@ndumferdy2545
You're using a Non Inspired Version.
@@larrybedouin2921 No TRANSLATION is inspired.
According to Edward Gibbons, The Rise and Fall of The Roman Empire, after Constantine had his Vision of The Cross which inspired his army to victory, and he won the civil war and became emperor, he decreed that Christianity be legalized. But the old Roman ways were still common, and the magistrates were powerful: they were keepers of the temples, which had been temples to the gods, Jupiter and Mars and all those guys,. Magistrates (magi = wise, powerful) were municipal officers, performed weddings, funerals, all that AND executed contracts - and collected taxes and were allowed to keep a commission, so it was a lucrative position. Under Roman law, church and state were united. The Emperor was Pontificus Maximus", Head Dude, and his word was "divined" as inspired by the gods, and therefore became law. (USA = separation of church and state) After Constantine legalized the church, the magistrates all became Catholic bishops! so they could control the temple, and all the Roman temples, throughout the vast empire, became roman catholic churches. But they required new robes. And the Pope, The Pontiff, wears a pointy hat. That's how.
Whereas Caesar ruled by power of fear, Jesus Christ rules by power of love.
"Render unto Caesar that which is Caesars and render unto God that which is God's".
The line about give unto Cesar what is his was infused so as not to upset the ruling powers to try and squash the religion. The actual writers of the gospels (they were not Matthew mark Luke or John) were extremely intelligent in their word choices to write a religion that could get the most people and try to stay out of persecution - at least until they had enough followers and power and then didn’t some real trash things like torturing “witches” or the crusades where they would kill people simply for not believing
Edward gibbons wrote more then 200 years ago. Almost everything he wrote on this subject has been debunked by modern science. He is not a credible source
@@thisstupid757 if you think the crusades were that simple you haven't studied them enough
@@partydean17 and if someone were to think they were justified then neither have they
@@thisstupid757 justified in the sense of the word you're using for made Just, no. I only meant there are more complex and nuanced pressures and pulls and relationships going on between several different cultures, rulers, and incentives. Not "simply" anything
Wasn't John the Baptist the first to baptize and not Antioch
Antioch is a place not a person
Baptist was something done in Israel
baptizing in the Name of Almighty Fahter name of Son and the Holy spirit of the Covenant not baptizing in christian
I would love to see the sources you interpret as the Catholic Church being started in the 4th century. Is it your assumption that the Church didn't exist before the Council of Nicea? What makes you think that?
You showed the image of a different **St. Ignatius** 💀 it’s St. Ignatius of Antioch, not St. Ignatius of Loyola lol.
11:25 does your book cover all the atrocities that the Catholic Church has committed? Because i would be very interested in that.
You should see what the protestant did, even to each other.
I can’t by your book as you use the woke CE and BCE instead of the western AD and BC.
The Catholic Church was started by Christ when He called together the Twelve Apostles - and when Judas committed suicide - the Apostles elected Mathias.
I grew up with this nonsense but thankfully I'm one of a few that has made a full recovery.
There will always be people who go off on a tangent.
Jesus loves you, he is willing to leave 99 other of us whom does not need repentance, and come to search for you!
Question: "Are Catholic beliefs and practices biblical?"
Answer: The issue concerning any church and its practices should be "Is this Biblical?" If a teaching is Biblical (taken in context), it should be embraced. If it is not, it should be rejected. God is more interested in whether a church is doing His will and obeying His Word than whether it can trace a line of succession back to Jesus' apostles. Jesus was very concerned about abandoning the Word of God to follow the traditions of men (Mark 7:7). Traditions are not inherently invalid-there are some good and valuable traditions. Again, the issue must be whether a doctrine, practice, or tradition is Biblical. How then does the Roman Catholic Church compare with the teachings of the Word of God?
Salvation: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that salvation is by baptismal regeneration and is maintained through the Catholic sacraments unless a willful act of sin is committed that breaks the state of sanctifying grace. The Bible teaches that we are saved by grace which is received through simple faith (Ephesians 2:8-9), and that good works are the result of a change of the heart wrought in salvation (Ephesians 2:10; 2 Corinthians 5:17) and the fruit of that new life in Christ (John 15).
Assurance of salvation: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that salvation cannot be guaranteed or assured. 1 John 5:13 states that the letter of 1 John was written for the purpose of assuring believers of the CERTAINTY of their salvation.
Good Works: The Roman Catholic Church states that Christians are saved by meritorious works (beginning with baptism) and that salvation is maintained by good works (receiving the sacraments, confession of sin to a priest, etc.) The Bible states that Christians are saved by grace through faith, totally apart from works (Titus 3:5; Ephesians 2:8-9; Galatians 3:10-11; Romans 3:19-24).
Baptism: In the New Testament baptism is ALWAYS practiced AFTER saving faith in Christ. Baptism is not the means of salvation; it is faith in the Gospel that saves (1 Corinthians 1:14-18; Romans 10:13-17). The Roman Catholic Church teaches baptismal regeneration of infants, a practice never found in Scripture. The only possible hint of infant baptism in the Bible that the Roman Catholic Church can point to is that the whole household of the Philippian jailer was baptized in Acts 16:33. However, the context nowhere mentions infants. Acts 16:31 declares that salvation is by faith. Paul spoke to all of the household in verse 32, and the whole household believed (verse 34). This passage only supports the baptism of those who have already believed, not of infants.
Prayer: The Roman Catholic Church teaches Catholics to not only pray to God, but also to petition Mary and the saints for their prayers. Contrary to this, we are taught in Scripture to only pray to God (Matthew 6:9; Luke 18:1-7).
Priesthood: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that there is a distinction between the clergy and the "lay people," whereas the New Testament teaches the priesthood of all believers (1 Peter 2:9).
Sacraments: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that a believer is infused with grace upon reception of the sacraments. Such teaching is nowhere found in Scripture.
Confession: The Roman Catholic Church teaches that unless a believer is hindered, the only way to receive the forgiveness of sins is by confessing them to a priest. Contrary to this, Scripture teaches that confession of sins is to be made to God (1 John 1:9).
Mary: The Roman Catholic Church teaches, among other things, that Mary is the Queen of Heaven, a perpetual virgin, and the co-redemptress who ascended into heaven. In Scripture, she is portrayed as an obedient, believing servant of God, who became the mother of Jesus. None of the other attributes mentioned by the Roman Catholic Church have any basis in the Bible. The idea of Mary being the co-redemptress and another mediator between God and man is not only extra-biblical (found only outside of Scripture), but is also unbiblical (contrary to Scripture). Acts 4:12 declares that Jesus is the only redeemer. 1 Timothy 2:5 proclaims that Jesus is the only mediator between God and men.
Many other examples could be given.
These issues alone clearly identify the Catholic Church as being unbiblical. Every Christian denomination has traditions and practices that are not explicitly based on Scripture. That is why Scripture must be the standard of Christian faith and practice. The Word of God is always true and reliable. The same cannot be said of church tradition. Our guideline is to be: "What does Scripture say?" (Romans 4:3; Galatians 4:30; Acts 17:11). 2 Timothy 3:16-17 declares, "All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting, and training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work."
Only God knoes everything...👍🙏
“Knows”
"Only God knoes everything"
ChatGPT: You aint seen nothing yet.
"You are the Christ, the Son of the Living God." This is the "rock" Jesus is building His Church on.
All through out the Old Testament, the Rock is God Himself. Peter, which means pebble, is not the Rock.
Jesus is the Chief cornerstone of the church!
Is there a discord server where everyone wants to go to, to discuss this?
Constantine's involvement in the church changed the religion and put it on the map
Wrong. Thanks for simplistic misunderstanding
Correct 100% about King Constantine. He spun the papacy into power with his political court, even mandating Sunday observation by law. Politics shounever mix with the church. Look what a killing machine the papacy became, slaying "hetetics" for the Roman empire. Disgusting murderers of millions.
The whore was drunken with the blood of the saints, indeed.
No
@@cristianosiqueira1536 Yes. Your simplistic "no" cannot change the history books. Why not stop protecting the devil and his evil popes? Their whole job is to kill Protestants and their infants, according to the jesuit extreme oath of induction.
"In her ( the papacy) was found the blood of ALL slain upon the earth."That's why the papacy is gong into the lake of fire very soon. Her cup of iniquity is full.
I can't wait to see Romanism fried to a crisp for all the murders it has done.
Yes, in 313 the ruler Constantine claimed he had a dream that in the sign of 'IHS' ( really Isis, Horus, and Set), he would conquer. So he forced the Catholic church-state upon everyone, including Sunday enforcement laws with civil and criminal penalties for being caught working on his counterfeit Sunday-sabbath. The papacy thus began in tyranny, and aspires to rule the world once again with its Sun-day MARK OF THE BEAST. Coming soon :national Sunday laws per Poop Francisco's Laudato Si proclamation.
@Enix Blue Rain *Really? RUDorwhat? Your very own pope used the term R Catholic Church.*
The first known occurrence of "Roman Catholic" as a synonym for "Catholic Church" was in communication with the Armenian Apostolic Church in 1208, after the East-West Schism. The last official magisterial document to use "Roman Catholic Church" was issued by Pope Pius XII in 1950.
you siad
assuming too many things such as "Roman Catholic Church" as the official name.
Lol ignorant much 1st inspired by God the Holy Ghost & spoken by St.Matthew in the apostles creed 33 A.D ....day of Pentecost ( start of the church )...." One , Holy, Catholic & Apostolic"
1st post apostle historical extant writing by one of the disciples St.Ignatious of Antioch 107 A.D .
Get an education.
@@quiricomazarin476 *I love your tales. Where in Mat 16 or Acts 1-2 says the Church Christ founded was R Catholic Church?*
you said
spoken by St.Matthew in the apostles creed 33 A.D ....day of Pentecost ( start of the church )...." One , Holy, Catholic & Apostolic"
@@quiricomazarin476 *Most of Ignatius writings were forgeries. In the first place all writings including this does not say R Church = the Universal Church or the Church CHrist founded. You are misled.*
*"catholic" in all writings refers to the Universal Christian Church. Not R Catholic Church. Church has always meant all churches + all believers. Nothing to do with Church of Rome (current r Catholic Church).*
you said
1st post apostle historical extant writing by one of the disciples St.Ignatious of Antioch 107 A.D .
@@jediv3381 yes I know you heretics who have no historical proof to back you up as it falls apart.
Your forced to ( as you always do ) tell half lies & untruths like your father Satan...to try & put a false strawman in the story.
Even if it were so st.polycarp st.evodious ect....you would have to get rid or try & discredit every Christian in the original church ...including the apostles as they all were Catholic.
But I'd like a list from you detailing who gave you your faith person to person back to christ....I know you can't without changing faith beliefs & doctrines as that is the essence of a protestant to go against truth & change.
So please give me a list?
@@jediv3381 yeah dufus if you had a modicum of brain cells & knew history & weren't so full of lies....
You could see the Catholic church started on Pentecost day ( apostles creed ) it wasn't until its head went to Rome & put the headquarters there.
But it's catholic primarily as not all Catholics follow the Roman rite DUH.
Get an education before you put your foot in your mouth again.
Absolutely interesting info ✝️
The Catholic Church evolved over time I understand that it didn't start during his ministry crucifixion or after his Resurrection in a "chronological order" it evolved through the work of Christs followers of the day
Wasn't he born during the reign of Tiberius?
Jesus died during the reign of Tiberius.
What I've come across that is mentioned by historian's is that Constantine was not present at the council and he had converted to arianism i.e. Follower of arian belief that Jesus was only human not divine, which the council of Nicea had rejected and the main reason for the council.
... historians* (plural, no apostrophe)
Constantine was a PAGAN when he presided over the Council in Nicea. He appointed himself as Pope. His so-called conversion was on his deathbed.
2 Thessalonians 2:3 Let no one lead you astray in any way, because it will not come unless THE APOSTASY COMES FIRST and the man of lawlessness gets revealed, the son of destruction. 4 He stands in opposition and EXALTS HIMSELF above every so-called god or object of worship, so that he sits down in the temple of God, publicly showing himself to be a god.
Always check. Don't go by what so-and-so said.
@@tongakhan230 he didn't preside over the council nor attend the council nor appointed himself as pope.
@@anomalousviewer3164 : There is something called Google. Please check things out.
The title 'Pontifex Maximus' was a Roman title adopted into the Roman church.
The word Pontiff comes from it. Refers to the Pope.
Wikipedia would help.
@@tongakhan230 sounds like a term equal to the successor of the Roman title of Emperor. Makes sense the actual pope would wrestle it politically back from the Emperor
"Now I say to you that you are Peter (which means ‘rock’), and upon this rock I will build my church, and all the powers of hell will not conquer it."
Question for those who reject Catholicism: If you believe in Jesus, then which present-day church did He built?
Most excellent post!!!
Also I understand they spoke Aramaic and aramic for rock is cephas.
Jesus started Catholic church
@@johnyang1420 Jesus started the Way. Constantine started the Romanist church/ state religion 300 years later. Jesus predicted the rise of the papal beast in Rome in Revelation 13.
Jesus started The Way, later called Christians ( not catholics) at Antioch.
300 years later, Constantine began the apostate Roman church-state k own as Catholicism.
The reformers tried hard to correct the catholic errors and spread the word that the papacy was the antichrist power. But the jesuit order was created to suppress that truth.
Today, the closest we have to truth is the Adventist church. Until recently, this church was the only one giving the biblical warning to come out of Babylon (the papacy), as well as honoring the 7th day Sabbath that the papacy changed to Sunday and violated God's law arrogantly
Jesus did not build the Romanist church/state hybrid, but He sure warned udms about it in Revelation 13, 17, and 18.
Come out of her!
Blessed be God forever. Jesus gave the keys of heaven to Peter. 🙏
For those who would claim that Peter is the rock upon which Christ’s church was built. This is not the case and there are many in church history who would disagree with Catholics on this matter.
The Greek word for Peter is petros which means a single rock or a boulder. It is not upon him that Christ’s Church was built.
The Greek word for rock in this passage is petra which means a rocky foundation or bedrock and it is upon this petra that Christ builds His church. Now what is the petra that Jesus is referring to? In context, it is the confession that Peter gave “you are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” It is upon this foundation, something revealed from the Father in heaven that Christ builds His church, not on a fallible and sinful man (like all of us) like Peter.
The word Rock is a title God uses of Himself and it is clearly applied to Jesus (Deuteronomy 32:4, 15, 18, 32:30-31; 2 Samuel 23:3; Psalm 89:26; Isaiah 17:10; 30:29; 44:8; Habakkuk 1:12; 1 Corinthians 10:1-5; Matthew 16:18
Roman Catholicism claims that Peter was the first Pope and the office of Pope began with him. Based on Peter’s own words, we are given no indication that he was a pope or ever saw himself as the leader above all after Jesus’ ascension.
1 Peter 5:1-3 NASB
[1] Therefore, I exhort the elders among you, as your fellow elder and witness of the sufferings of Christ, and a partaker also of the glory that is to be revealed, [2] shepherd the flock of God among you, exercising oversight not under compulsion, but voluntarily, according to the will of God; and not for sordid gain, but with eagerness; [3] nor yet as lording it over those allotted to your charge, but proving to be examples to the flock.
CHURCH FATHERS QUOTES ON MATTHEW 16:18:
Augustine of Hippo:
“Peter, called after this rock, represented the person of the Church which is built upon this rock, and has received 'the keys of the kingdom of heaven.' For, ‘Thou art Peter’ and not Thou art the rock' was said to him. But 'the rock was Christ,' in confessing whom, as also the whole Church confesses, Simon was called
Peter.”
Jerome:
“The one foundation which the apostolic architect laid is our Lord Jesus Christ. Upon this stable and firm foundation, which has itself been laid on solid ground, the Church of Christ is built .. for the Church was founded upon a rock ... upon this rock the Lord established his Church; and the apostle Peter received his name from this rock.... The rock is Christ, Who gave to His apostles, that they also should be called rocks, 'Thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build My Church.”
John Chrysostom:
“Thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my Church;' that is, on the faith of his confession.”
Basil of Seluecia:
“Now Christ called this confession a rock, and he named the one who confessed it 'Peter,' perceiving the appellation which was suitable to the author of this confession. For this is the solemn rock of religion, this the basis of salvation, this the wall of faith and the foundation of truth: 'For no other foundation can anyone lay than that which is laid, which is Christ Jesus.”