Totally agree with Breadman. Just because Madrimov employed hand probes, feints, foot movement, does not mean he won the rounds, off of all that movement and feinting there was very little end product. Bud in my opinion won fairly comfortably.
Breadman one of the smartest people in the game I can listen too him and teddy atlas talk about boxing 🥊 all day literally if you’re a boxing 🥊 fan like me you’ll understand why I say that!!!!
Madrimov did not throw combinations at all. His jab was not existent. Crawford neutralized him. A lot of people hate Bud for whatever reason. It was wishful thinking that Madrimov won or that it was even close.
I didn't understand what all the controversy was about until I rewatched the fight WITH sound. It was horrible. I watched a couple of exchanges where Crawford landed a jab, Madrimov countered with a very good tight hand, then got touched with a 3 or 4 punch combination on the way out. All they said was "Big right hand by Madrimov". But he lost the exchange.
That’s what I have been saying. The only thing madrimov did was throw an over right hand that’s all. No jab no footwork no counter jab or attack nothing. Just a right hand. Crawford beat him 9-3 if we are been fair and honest. The commentary was just wack and stupid. Dunno what they were watching. Everyone should go back and watch the fight and watch details of the fight. Very simole.
@@Tonyoung55 There is a point where the referee stopped the fighters after their heads butt. That's when Crawford's eye had swollen. It's all there in the playback, just that the cameras weren't zeroing in on that moment.
I agree I said the same thing… now him being caught a few times may have exasperated (check spelling 😂) it. Overall Bud was in control this whole fight, those downplaying his performance just wanted a knockout but undermined Israil’s abilities. I do believe if it was 1 more rd Bud would’ve stopped him because he was hurt from them body shots.
Bigger guy, even when you block a lot of shots off your gloves there's still going to be damage. No headbutts needed to explain that even though there were a few
Yo Bread man you right the commentator never announced Crawford body shots and his jads because they were more focused on madrimov you know like praising him instead of focusing on both fighters even Shawn Porter himself sort of difference and he was a part of the commentations😮
To the boys who think Bud has no chance with Canelo now just find out what Canelo weighed in fight night, his last three fights, and then find out how much Madrimov weighed in the ring fight night with Crawford. Only a few pounds difference
Canelo has far better skills, he hits a whole lot harder and he is too times smarter. Canelo would knock out Terrence Crawford in less than 6 rounds and if it goes the distance he would still win because he would hurt Terrence through out the fight and win multiple rounds by two points. Canelo is too big and too experienced, too strong and he is a better all around fighter than Terrence.
Always great to see Breadman break it down! Watching the fight, Crawford fought a good technical fight. Im satisfied with his win . I think the bottom line is Madrimov challenged Crawford in a way no one thought he would. And now, every parrot out there on the internet is discrediting Crawford because they didn’t get the fight they wanted…
Breadman is one of the sharper minds in the game. I agree with almost everything he says and learn something every time i hear him speak. He is very good at keeping his biases at the door
When a fighter defends, blocks and/or avoids numerous punches throughout a fight, it’s noteworthy when a punch connects. Noteworthy, meaning it’s a significant occurrence. But some fans, commentators and even some judges look at that and think a fighter is doing better than they actually are. That is exactly what happened to Bud in this fight. Some people saw Madrimov connect with several good shots and (in their minds) converted that into winning a round that Crawford hit Madrimov more times. Ummm … that’s not how boxing is scored. Boxing is based on a point system What I saw was Crawford 9 to Madrimov 3 … how anyone sees it differently is beyond me. Crawford versus Alvarez? Come on, now. Let’s be real. Crawford is a special fighter. It would certainly be competitive. If Khan, Kovalev, Plant and Bivol can win round after round on Canelo, you really think Bud has no chance? Wow. Crawford has just as good a chin at 154+ … ain’t going to turn glass suddenly if he moves to 168. 😊😊😊
“You have to take the belt from the champ” is something promoters say to protect their own fighters. Boxing is scored rd by rd and people are never willing to say what rd they gave to who, they just say “I don’t think or feel they won”. That means nothing!
In my opinion if you win you win. If it is too close to decide then it's a draw. As long as you beat the champ is all that matters. You shouldn't have to dominate just to win. That being said I do beleive Bud dominated in the since that he controlled the fight. He landed more combinations he was more active and he closed the show in the championship rounds
I didn't give Madrimov a round! All that said Madrimov won or worse it was a ROBERRY?????!!! What rounds did yal give Madrimov........ I'll wait......Please stop the b.s. he had moments where he caught Bud with those straight right hands.
I want to preface this comment with Breadman is one of the most respected people/opinions in all of boxing (hence the reason I clicked on the video). He is technically right, however the onus IS on the challenger to beat the champion if there are close rounds. There is no rule, but I do believe this is how most fight fans, and even judges score fights. I think this only applicable with tight, close, swing rounds.
brilliant take. i swear i saw it the same way. i had him winning 9-10 rounds. looked like they gave madrimov 10 points for every one hard punch landed. he would land 3 hard punches in a round while catching 15 clean jabs. only disagreement was i think crawford would beat canelo easier. that constant feinting and fast right is different than ive seen. madrimov had 350 amateur fights and it showed. that man was literally like the Rocky of Uzbekistan
Breadman, Breadman, Breadman, You speak of Willy Pep, a guy who fought Pauly Jackson twice in Pottsville PA. whom many of that era said Pauly beat Willy, but he had to beat him down in order to win. Contrary to what you might think - there was a time when a fighter had to beat a champion decisively in order to get the win. Boxing is not as corrupt as it use to be _but it still needs some work, i. e. PED's and weight bullying.
That’s what I have been saying. The only thing madrimov did was throw an over right hand that’s all. No jab no footwork no counter jab or attack nothing. Just a right hand. Crawford beat him 9-3 if we are been fair and honest. The commentary was just wack and stupid. Dunno what they were watching. Everyone should go back and watch the fight and watch details of the fight. Very simole.
Madiumov was fighting as he was coming up to 154 he was trained for this fight not to throw many punches survive and get his popularity up that's why they chose Crawford.
To all those people who go said madrimov how many jabs did he throw compared to Bud? How many combinations did he throw compared to Bud? You can’t win Not throwing combinations and no jab let’s get real.
I feel like crawford won the fight 8-4. But it's not a stupid rule. Its built on emotion & fan psyche in the same way we think of home field advantage or a fighter fighting in his hometown as a leg up on the challenger. Or the same way an incumbent politician is thought to have an advantage over a newcomer. Its a built in awareness & expectation & benefit to the champ. The newcomers in each scenario have to do more to convince us. It just so happened that the challenger had more history & reputation than the champ in this fight. ...But its def a legitimate concept. Not stupid.
When defining the best of an era, we need to distinguish between resume quality and P4P lineage. For example, Canelo's resume might be stronger than Crawford's, Canelo hasn’t held the number 1 P4P spot as long as Crawford. During the era in which both have been active, Crawford has been the number 1 P4P for much longer. Looking back, if we’re identifying the top P4P fighters of the decade or post-Mayweather era, it’s clear that Andre Ward and then Terence Crawford more consistently. Canelo can’t be considered the predominant P4P fighter after Mayweather. We must clarify whether we’re talking about resume quality or overall P4P status. However, to fairly assess Crawford’s accolades, it’s important to note that he’s a 2-division undisputed, something neither Canelo nor Pacquiao have done. He may even become a 3-time undisputed champion, a historic accomplishment. Additionally, Crawford has no losses like Canelo or Pacquiao, nor has he had close fights requiring rematches. So there’s an argument
The only things he’s did good is Survive 12 round the fight wasn’t even close that’s man didn’t even let’s his hand go because he’s knew the counter punch was coming like those mean upper cut
I think Bread Man is missing the point. The saying is " To be the champ you have to beat the champ". It's a hidden rule dating back decades and it has nothing to do with if you are a technical boxer. Teddy Atlas , Jim Lampley , Bert Suger and many other boxing historians have said that quote many times.
Bud’s jabs put madrimov behind in the scoring, i thought madrimov would then become offensive, i was wrong as madrimov kept his feinting even when bud opened up in the late rounds.
Crawford never turned orthodox so madrinovs training against a southpaw took away that preparation. Madri just posedb. Maybe he just is a decent fighter like sandor martin, josh Taylor etc who stinks out the joint.
#1OCKing: That's a damn lie it is a champion(Respect)in boxing it always have been.If that wasn't the case Jamaine Ortiz would of beat 🪘 Teofima Lopez.Im a Crawford(Biggest)supporter I would tell him to his face or zoom(whatever) stay at 154.2 more fights (Boots)an(Errol Spence jr) make it(3) defeat(Teofima Lopez)for cheating Jamaine Ortiz an retire.Pack it up an do like Errol start ur own promotion.
Crawford doesn't have the footwork to contend with Mayweather. Nor does he have the boxing IQ of the when, why and the how to contend with Mayweather. That was shown in Crawford's 54 pound debut. Mayweather would've feinted and used footwork against Madrimov earlier in the fight, then towards the middle of the fight would've been in the pocket walking Madrimov down. It's hard to feint when you're on your back foot.
Breadman was Plant’s special trainer against Benivedez, look what happened to Plant! Most of the black commentators/boxers refuse to believe that Crawford was punching air most of the time and his one trick pony (countering) didn’t work. Madrimov literally ended Crawford’s BSng in terms of Canelo fight and Crawford himself knew he lost and has said to Madrimov we will have rerun it as he himself knows the win was handed to him by a biased American system. You have to beat a Champion convincingly & Crawford is a so called hyped p4p 40-0 with bunch of easy fights and one low blow against khan vs. a 10-0 pro that cleaned his clock. Keep crying as Jared learned his lesson ! many fake hyped boxers will evaporate early in their fake careers as Saudi has changed the game and promotions will not be able to hype Crawford types moving into the future
Madrimov won this fight. You're crazy if you think otherwise. Madrimov landed that straight right all night and bud had no answer. Bud's body work was amazing because he literally couldn't hit Madrimov in the head, hence why Crawford missed 80% of his punches.
All due respect to the Philadelphia King 👑💪🏽💯 but this man knows nothing about boxing 🥊💯 it's not even about winning is how you winning first of all you supposed to stop him by knockout not go the distance with an Open class fighter how could you be paying for pound the best fighter on the planet and Go the distance with the guy that just came out the amateur make it make sense
Big fan of Bud - but this fight was not an exciting fight! Bud won but there is an unspoken axiom that the challenger should take the title away from the champ, period! Leonard got the gift of a lifetime getting the decision from Marvin! He even told Hagler that he won the fight! Bud needs to fight Boots at 154! That’s the fight everyone wants to see! Canelo and Benavidez! You, what’s the question?
India podcast as Israel’s Muslim 😂! Listen to Tim Bradley on Sean Zittels podcast at Tim’s kids soccer game as he was in the car being interviewed . Crawford landed more body to hard shots and the M didn’t and he controlled Israel , I have heard you have to beat the champion convincingly a long time , I agree to an extent as a draw the champ remains the champ they don’t share the Championship !
Crawford punched air 1 third of the times no one mentions that. Madrimoz hit him all night long with that straight right hand. That was not a belt stripping performance at least a TIE
I picked Rayo. Cruz is trash and been trash. All hype from a loss to Tank with onw hand. He's extremely one dimensional and doesn't even do the one thing he can do all that well
@@DOUGHGON CRUZ is straight trash. no jab, no strategy, no skill. it is an insult that anyone compares him to mike tyson. i was happy he got beat by rayo.
Crawford doesn't have A Chance Against Canelo Seriously The Fight Showed you Everything You Needed And More" Make The Boots Fight So you can get Retired
Wow…gaslighting the public. He lost. In every meaningful category he lost. Power punches lost. Percentage jabs lost power punch percentage lost. Total punch percentage lost. He took 23 more power punches to the head than Madrimov. Let that sink in. Free shots…power punches…to the head…23!!! By contrast Crawford’s one real win was 11 extra punches landed, all jabs, vs those 23 power punches to his head. He won? How? He didn’t control the fight. Madrimov was in front of him all night. Again for the math challenged… Crawford landed 21.9 % of all punches 17.9 of his jabs. So he won by missing 82% of his jabs and 78% of all his punches? Seriously…? You’re high!!! Madrimov controlled the fight. He wobbled Crawford in the 12th when Crawford tried to come after him, getting pot shot right the rest of the way, until the final 20 seconds when he finally engaged again. But you think he won? BS. I picked Crawford in this fight. If you’re honest you know he lost. And I’d bet dollars to dimes on a real punch stats breakdown instead of this fake compubox junk…he lost on that total also. It’s really pathetic people blowing all this smoke for him. This is what ruin’s boxing.
I don't see the argument for Crawford losing, let alone this big robbery that people are talking about. I'm curious where you got all of the stats you used to prove your point if it was not Compubox?
Bud better than Mayweather took more risk dominated more no close fights didn't need rematch haven't seen no one dominated like bud or be avoided like bud or not duck like bud and pac ducked him till retirement canelo shouldn't be mentioned with great he a drug cheat duck fix fights gifted decisions gifted belts catch weight rehydration clauses he finnesed his whole career worse thing to happen to boxing
The commentators seem to be Crawford fans. It was an even fight. Crawford dominated the last rounds. He couldn't dominate the earlier rounds. Israel won here.
Total bullshit. Breadman disappoints. Crawford did fuck all till the end. AND THEN IT WASNT ALL THAT MUCH. American bias continues. The local fighter has all the advantages. The judges all gave the first 2 rounds to Crawford...yeah right.
What did Madrimov do that was so convincing in the first two rounds? He was on the front foot pretty much all night, this is true. But he was not throwing or landing much. I think the first combination I saw him land was like the 7th round.
Listen he know you have to take the belt from the champ … Crawford didn’t beat him clearly… stop pernel Whitaker beat chavez & they gave chavez the fight so stop 🛑 sweet pee beat chavez clearly & lost so bread man stop 🛑 you just don’t want Crawford to hear you say he lost … thsts called being politically correct y’all guys on a buddy buddy plan get out of hear
Wow what koolaid are you drinking? Israil- no jab, no combinations. 270 punches for the whole fight. You are a Bud hater that’s all. Stop with your nonsense.
Wait, you're saying Crawford didn't win because he didn't "take the belt from the champ", then you use Sweet Pea vs Chavez to make your point? You may want to rethink this comment.
@@runninreb9142 I’m sorry you have to be under 30 years old thinking like that … the new millennium boxers are watered down … they get the belt & then the next fight loose it … see in my error there was only 1-2 belts so you couldn’t duck if you wanted to be a champion… what’s happening right now with me & your conversation is like comparing Jordan to labron 2 different eras my time it was more competitive then now it’s to many belts so there not forced to fight each other… 👌🏾
@@larrytucker7763 I just wanted you to fact-check your comment. The fight was scored a draw (which was still a robbery) and Sweet Pea was the champ. So in this case the, not only did the challenger not clearly win, he clearly lost.
Totally agree with Breadman. Just because Madrimov employed hand probes, feints, foot movement, does not mean he won the rounds, off of all that movement and feinting there was very little end product. Bud in my opinion won fairly comfortably.
@@ecw787 not enough punches from Madrimov for sure
8-4 Bud for me and that's only because I gave the champ a swing rd. It could've easily been 9-3 Bud
YES N POPPED HIM WITH THE JAB ALL NIGHT PLUS COMBOS DURING THE FIGHT
0@@DOUGHGON
Listening to the commutators is why people are thinking the fight was closer then it really was
Exactly. Broadcaster will always promote the fighter signed to the platform.So many people are sheep!
some commentators did were far more accurate. But yes the most watched channel (perhaps) did have two commentators that were just talking crap.
MEDIA BIAS AKA THE GOODE OLE BOY NARRTIVE
Breadman one of the smartest people in the game I can listen too him and teddy atlas talk about boxing 🥊 all day literally if you’re a boxing 🥊 fan like me you’ll understand why I say that!!!!
@@pdrussell7302 yep the breadman is a boxing genius. He's been a big influence on my breakdown videos.
Madrimov did not throw combinations at all. His jab was not existent. Crawford neutralized him. A lot of people hate Bud for whatever reason. It was wishful thinking that Madrimov won or that it was even close.
@@E.Carrillo are you serious mafrimov hit bud with so many right hands bud was begging for a left … stop 🛑
@@E.Carrillo your a crawford fanboy right ?
Was one punch at a time. Limiting counter opportunities for Bud.
It wasn’t a jab he was hitting Crawford with dude it was overhand rights !!!!
@playaxmade So your saying Bud has an iron chin? Never wobbled one time at '54.
I didn't understand what all the controversy was about until I rewatched the fight WITH sound. It was horrible.
I watched a couple of exchanges where Crawford landed a jab, Madrimov countered with a very good tight hand, then got touched with a 3 or 4 punch combination on the way out.
All they said was "Big right hand by Madrimov". But he lost the exchange.
Facts bro
That’s what I have been saying. The only thing madrimov did was throw an over right hand that’s all. No jab no footwork no counter jab or attack nothing. Just a right hand. Crawford beat him 9-3 if we are been fair and honest. The commentary was just wack and stupid. Dunno what they were watching. Everyone should go back and watch the fight and watch details of the fight. Very simole.
@samsmith7986 they either casuals, racists, oh canelo lovers why they think Bud lost
Breadman is one of the most knowledgeable guys in the sport, love his mailbag on boxingscene. Very unbiased and always breaks things down brilliantly
@@smartz9043 💯
Bread man is a cool dude
@@rodgerbattle8692 always great listening to him talk boxing
Thank god for Breadman, Tarver and Toney. The rest of these “boxing” people and fans are fuckin annoying.
Yea its the casuals like maddix and Mora Dazn
Bud's swollen right eye came from an incidental clash of heads
Man stop bro lol. I had it 8-4 for bud but he got hit a lot with big shots eye was swollen damn near after 3 rounds
@@Tonyoung55 There is a point where the referee stopped the fighters after their heads butt. That's when Crawford's eye had swollen. It's all there in the playback, just that the cameras weren't zeroing in on that moment.
@@triconcert ok cool
I agree I said the same thing… now him being caught a few times may have exasperated (check spelling 😂) it. Overall Bud was in control this whole fight, those downplaying his performance just wanted a knockout but undermined Israil’s abilities. I do believe if it was 1 more rd Bud would’ve stopped him because he was hurt from them body shots.
Bigger guy, even when you block a lot of shots off your gloves there's still going to be damage. No headbutts needed to explain that even though there were a few
Yo Bread man you right the commentator never announced Crawford body shots and his jads because they were more focused on madrimov you know like praising him instead of focusing on both fighters even Shawn Porter himself sort of difference and he was a part of the commentations😮
Breadman is always on it!! He has a great boxing mind and always speaks with intelligence!!
Madrimov did a good job not getting KOed.
Crawford showed discipline not falling through the faints
@@whynotyou783 that's right why not you much love and respect fam
The upper cuts, and body shots, opening that high guard
To the boys who think Bud has no chance with Canelo now just find out what Canelo weighed in fight night, his last three fights, and then find out how much Madrimov weighed in the ring fight night with Crawford. Only a few pounds difference
@@gypsyman1939 good point!
ABSOLUTELY!!! Been saying this same thing well before the Madrimov bout.
Two completely different styles. Canelo is not going to be doing all of those feints for 12 rounds.
Canelo has far better skills, he hits a whole lot harder and he is too times smarter. Canelo would knock out Terrence Crawford in less than 6 rounds and if it goes the distance he would still win because he would hurt Terrence through out the fight and win multiple rounds by two points.
Canelo is too big and too experienced, too strong and he is a better all around fighter than Terrence.
@@Mr.Be.Realisticits better to see then ti read hypotheticals
Fans upset at the Spence results are the ones setting unrealistic expectations.
Always great to see Breadman break it down! Watching the fight, Crawford fought a good technical fight. Im satisfied with his win . I think the bottom line is Madrimov challenged Crawford in a way no one thought he would. And now, every parrot out there on the internet is discrediting Crawford because they didn’t get the fight they wanted…
great analysis by coach Edwards
@@mrCrackedcase 💯
Bud hits the body like he digging no cap
@@smokesmitty1 those long levers really get to you
8-4 Bud and that being generous. It could've easily been 9-3.
It was his jab and combinations!
Breadman is one of the sharper minds in the game. I agree with almost everything he says and learn something every time i hear him speak. He is very good at keeping his biases at the door
@@frankl3518 💯
I agree !! 💯 To beat the Champ You got to beat him decisive or Knock him out!! COACH OUT 😎🤺
Just out box him at least 7 rounds
Not true,the champ has ro do enough to retain his title,not just pot shot ,here and there.
Crawford clearly won. However because his opponent was fairly unknown people expectations for a knockout is why there is so much backlash.
Breadman always be spittin that real
When a fighter defends, blocks and/or avoids numerous punches throughout a fight, it’s noteworthy when a punch connects. Noteworthy, meaning it’s a significant occurrence. But some fans, commentators and even some judges look at that and think a fighter is doing better than they actually are. That is exactly what happened to Bud in this fight. Some people saw Madrimov connect with several good shots and (in their minds) converted that into winning a round that Crawford hit Madrimov more times. Ummm … that’s not how boxing is scored. Boxing is based on a point system
What I saw was Crawford 9 to Madrimov 3 … how anyone sees it differently is beyond me.
Crawford versus Alvarez? Come on, now. Let’s be real. Crawford is a special fighter. It would certainly be competitive. If Khan, Kovalev, Plant and Bivol can win round after round on Canelo, you really think Bud has no chance? Wow. Crawford has just as good a chin at 154+ … ain’t going to turn glass suddenly if he moves to 168.
😊😊😊
Good and very accurate I agree 100% I say bud beats the boy way easier than Madrimov
You know something.
And power at 54
Madrimov landed more power punches than Crawford. Let that sink in beyond your biases. Crawford threw more, that's it.
@@goodbot8526Compubox told you that. You didn't see that in the fight.
“You have to take the belt from the champ” is something promoters say to protect their own fighters. Boxing is scored rd by rd and people are never willing to say what rd they gave to who, they just say “I don’t think or feel they won”. That means nothing!
💯💯💯 BINGO! Round by Round.
In my opinion if you win you win. If it is too close to decide then it's a draw. As long as you beat the champ is all that matters. You shouldn't have to dominate just to win. That being said I do beleive Bud dominated in the since that he controlled the fight. He landed more combinations he was more active and he closed the show in the championship rounds
@@josephthompson6942 yep Crawford won fair and square
You dont score fights at the end of the fight, you score round by round.
@@ecw787bud won 9 rounds
@@Antonio-h7c I agree
@@ecw787agreed what’s up with that bullshit mentality about having to beat the champ a win is a win doesn’t matter how anyone feels
I didn't give Madrimov a round! All that said Madrimov won or worse it was a ROBERRY?????!!! What rounds did yal give Madrimov........ I'll wait......Please stop the b.s. he had moments where he caught Bud with those straight right hands.
Thank you.
I gave him 5,8,10
I want to preface this comment with Breadman is one of the most respected people/opinions in all of boxing (hence the reason I clicked on the video). He is technically right, however the onus IS on the challenger to beat the champion if there are close rounds. There is no rule, but I do believe this is how most fight fans, and even judges score fights. I think this only applicable with tight, close, swing rounds.
brilliant take. i swear i saw it the same way. i had him winning 9-10 rounds. looked like they gave madrimov 10 points for every one hard punch landed. he would land 3 hard punches in a round while catching 15 clean jabs. only disagreement was i think crawford would beat canelo easier. that constant feinting and fast right is different than ive seen. madrimov had 350 amateur fights and it showed. that man was literally like the Rocky of Uzbekistan
Factz
Breadman, Breadman, Breadman, You speak of Willy Pep, a guy who fought Pauly Jackson twice in Pottsville PA. whom many of that era said Pauly beat Willy, but he had to beat him down in order to win. Contrary to what you might think - there was a time when a fighter had to beat a champion decisively in order to get the win. Boxing is not as corrupt as it use to be _but it still needs some work, i. e. PED's and weight bullying.
Thanks for the video, FAYZ BOXING
"I scored the fight a split decision" 😂😂😂 I needed that laugh
@@DaveBoxing definitely one of the funniest stories I've heard about scoring 😄
Fun Fact = MIKE MCCALLUM nicke name was the body snatcher one of my favorite fighters
My boxing coach mentioned him before, which fight do you recommend someone to watch to see his vicious body shots ?
@@killerman9309 check out some of the videos I've done on him and also my interview with Luis Monda who was trained by him 🥊
That’s what I have been saying. The only thing madrimov did was throw an over right hand that’s all. No jab no footwork no counter jab or attack nothing. Just a right hand. Crawford beat him 9-3 if we are been fair and honest. The commentary was just wack and stupid. Dunno what they were watching. Everyone should go back and watch the fight and watch details of the fight. Very simole.
Madiumov was fighting as he was coming up to 154 he was trained for this fight not to throw many punches survive and get his popularity up that's why they chose Crawford.
The controversy is because Crawford didn't get the KO. I said going in, if Crawford wins bu decision fols would act like he lost.
Just re-watched the fight. Madrimov basically feinted and moved around all fight, he rarely engaged and threw one punch at a time.
To all those people who go said madrimov how many jabs did he throw compared to Bud? How many combinations did he throw compared to Bud? You can’t win Not throwing combinations and no jab let’s get real.
I feel like crawford won the fight 8-4. But it's not a stupid rule. Its built on emotion & fan psyche in the same way we think of home field advantage or a fighter fighting in his hometown as a leg up on the challenger. Or the same way an incumbent politician is thought to have an advantage over a newcomer. Its a built in awareness & expectation & benefit to the champ. The newcomers in each scenario have to do more to convince us. It just so happened that the challenger had more history & reputation than the champ in this fight. ...But its def a legitimate concept. Not stupid.
When defining the best of an era, we need to distinguish between resume quality and P4P lineage. For example, Canelo's resume might be stronger than Crawford's, Canelo hasn’t held the number 1 P4P spot as long as Crawford. During the era in which both have been active, Crawford has been the number 1 P4P for much longer.
Looking back, if we’re identifying the top P4P fighters of the decade or post-Mayweather era, it’s clear that Andre Ward and then Terence Crawford more consistently. Canelo can’t be considered the predominant P4P fighter after Mayweather. We must clarify whether we’re talking about resume quality or overall P4P status. However, to fairly assess Crawford’s accolades, it’s important to note that he’s a 2-division undisputed, something neither Canelo nor Pacquiao have done. He may even become a 3-time undisputed champion, a historic accomplishment. Additionally, Crawford has no losses like Canelo or Pacquiao, nor has he had close fights requiring rematches. So there’s an argument
Crawford is a champion, thats why he got the fight. He was challenging as a super champion. So, on this one that so-called rule does not apply.
The only things he’s did good is Survive 12 round the fight wasn’t even close that’s man didn’t even let’s his hand go because he’s knew the counter punch was coming like those mean upper cut
Crawford has never had a close fight. This fight wasn’t close either.
Madrimov knew he lost look at his face before they announced the winner 😂😂😂😂
у мадримова в сша уже украли победу нокаутом(бой с уокером)
он знает что такое "справедливость" по американски
The only people think Bud lost is canelo fans, casuals, racists, and amateurs who don't know different styles 😅
No one really believes Israel won the fight,but people see what they want.
Facts.
I think Bread Man is missing the point.
The saying is " To be the champ you have to beat the champ". It's a hidden rule dating back decades and it has nothing to do with if you are a technical boxer.
Teddy Atlas , Jim Lampley , Bert Suger and many other boxing historians have said that quote many times.
1. Usyk
2. Canelo
3. Inoue
4. Crawford
This is the best of the ERA list post Floyd Mayweather
Bud’s jabs put madrimov behind in the scoring, i thought madrimov would then become offensive, i was wrong as madrimov kept his feinting even when bud opened up in the late rounds.
Manny has great resume but I question ped usage I would put Crawford up there with Mayweather, Ray Leonard, Hearns Hagler, Duran, Sweet Pea Whittaker,
💯 I agree with Manny PEDs usage question. I would add Aaron Pryor, Wilfred Benitez, to the list.
So just Americans?🤣🤣
Tell Bread his mic is not clear.
More experience ? Madrimov has over 400 amateur bouts
He done more hopkins ,also have to include he havent loss
Crawford never turned orthodox so madrinovs training against a southpaw took away that preparation. Madri just posedb. Maybe he just is a decent fighter like sandor martin, josh Taylor etc who stinks out the joint.
HERKY-JERKY OFF-RHYTHM THROWS RHYTHM FIGHTERS OFF
Madrimov landed at a higher percentage than Bud. Bud threw more, thus landed more than Madrimov.
That saying comes from a fight thats basically a draw u would let champ keep belt so challenger does have to convincingly win
That wasn't a draw and it wasn't even close to a draw. 8-4 Bud. You all trying to use metrics that shouldn't even be used.
Inoaye needs to come over here 1st to compete before we throw him in top 10 of century
Lennox Lewis top 5 for sure..he fought some in this century..
#1OCKing: That's a damn lie it is a champion(Respect)in boxing it always have been.If that wasn't the case Jamaine Ortiz would of beat 🪘 Teofima Lopez.Im a Crawford(Biggest)supporter I would tell him to his face or zoom(whatever) stay at 154.2 more fights (Boots)an(Errol Spence jr) make it(3) defeat(Teofima Lopez)for cheating Jamaine Ortiz an retire.Pack it up an do like Errol start ur own promotion.
Crawford would beat Floyd
Crawford doesn't have the footwork to contend with Mayweather. Nor does he have the boxing IQ of the when, why and the how to contend with Mayweather. That was shown in Crawford's 54 pound debut. Mayweather would've feinted and used footwork against Madrimov earlier in the fight, then towards the middle of the fight would've been in the pocket walking Madrimov down. It's hard to feint when you're on your back foot.
Bud stop Mayweather especially southpaw@@taseti4803
I agree
@@taseti4803 u sound silly
Crawford got beat up by Madrimov. Lol. Floyd would beat his head silly.
a middleweight struggling with a welterweight.
But in canelo resume there are many controversiol fight GGG 1 and 2 and lara
No controversy here. Crawford beat Madrimov 8-4 at minimum
Yeah but those are tougher fights
Breadman was Plant’s special trainer against Benivedez, look what happened to Plant!
Most of the black commentators/boxers refuse to believe that Crawford was punching air most of the time and his one trick pony (countering) didn’t work. Madrimov literally ended Crawford’s BSng in terms of Canelo fight and Crawford himself knew he lost and has said to Madrimov we will have rerun it as he himself knows the win was handed to him by a biased American system. You have to beat a Champion convincingly & Crawford is a so called hyped p4p 40-0 with bunch of easy fights and one low blow against khan vs. a 10-0 pro that cleaned his clock. Keep crying as Jared learned his lesson ! many fake hyped boxers will evaporate early in their fake careers as Saudi has changed the game and promotions will not be able to hype Crawford types moving into the future
Madrimov won this fight. You're crazy if you think otherwise. Madrimov landed that straight right all night and bud had no answer. Bud's body work was amazing because he literally couldn't hit Madrimov in the head, hence why Crawford missed 80% of his punches.
Which boxing match did you watch?
@@Georgia-m3o The one where Madrimov landed straight right after straight right.
🤡
You have to “take the title from the champion”. Crawford did so by outboxing Madrimov. 🥊☝🏿
They hate Crawford with a pation. He won that's fight.
Crawford won easily.
But if Madrimov fought like Crawford and Crawford fought like Madrimov, they would still say Crawford lost. 😂
Exactly !
All due respect to the Philadelphia King 👑💪🏽💯 but this man knows nothing about boxing 🥊💯 it's not even about winning is how you winning first of all you supposed to stop him by knockout not go the distance with an Open class fighter how could you be paying for pound the best fighter on the planet and Go the distance with the guy that just came out the amateur make it make sense
Bud won handily...
Big fan of Bud - but this fight was not an exciting fight! Bud won but there is an unspoken axiom that the challenger should take the title away from the champ, period! Leonard got the gift of a lifetime getting the decision from Marvin! He even told Hagler that he won the fight! Bud needs to fight Boots at 154! That’s the fight everyone wants to see! Canelo and Benavidez! You, what’s the question?
India podcast as Israel’s Muslim 😂! Listen to Tim Bradley on Sean Zittels podcast at Tim’s kids soccer game as he was in the car being interviewed . Crawford landed more body to hard shots and the M didn’t and he controlled Israel , I have heard you have to beat the champion convincingly a long time , I agree to an extent as a draw the champ remains the champ they don’t share the Championship !
GGG ISone of the best of the century
Many fighters have won belts by split decisions right?........🙄
Yo brother your audio is still rubbish wth come on man
Crawford punched air 1 third of the times no one mentions that. Madrimoz hit him all night long with that straight right hand. That was not a belt stripping performance at least a TIE
YDKSAB
C should have pushed him back
he picked rayo no one picked rayo
I picked Rayo last minute before the fight, because I remembered Rayo has fighting on the back foot in his arsenal
@@bubbaluv6487 yeh Rayo was definitely the underdog and surprised a lot of people
I picked Rayo. Cruz is trash and been trash. All hype from a loss to Tank with onw hand. He's extremely one dimensional and doesn't even do the one thing he can do all that well
@@DOUGHGON CRUZ is straight trash. no jab, no strategy, no skill. it is an insult that anyone compares him to mike tyson. i was happy he got beat by rayo.
Crawfish is the great black hope
Why would there need to be a "Black hope"? Do you have a clue what that phrase means?
Crawford is not the best of this ERA, that’s Canelo.
Breadman go worry about Plant next fight been beat up bad twice stop dude go worry about Plant
I say Bud won every round! Please make video on the rounds Israil won? Somebody Please because I don't believe you. Punches for Punches.
Fouts boxing has already did one. Bud 8-4 and really 9-3
Not enough jabs from Madrimov.
Crawford doesn't have A Chance Against Canelo Seriously The Fight Showed you Everything You Needed And More" Make The Boots Fight So you can get Retired
No sugar ray Robinson,Joe calzaque?????
This guy is smoking lol first he saying that bud is a master counter 3 Doritos later but bud couldn’t figure out how to do it SMH 😅
Anyone with 117 111 or 116 112 is biased af
Clearly you guys don’t know what a century is maybe the last decade
I had Bud winning 8 to 4.
What are we talking about the fight flop nobody wants to see him fight again they lost 10 million you should have knocked him out no novelist fighter
Bud should’ve been more aggressive and not tentative. He would’ve won the fight more impressively. He looked flat and uninspired in there honestly ✌🏽
He won 9 rounds
@@cbillups1325 I thought it was close but Crawford was the clear winner imo
@@montbrink4700 yeh there's no debate in my eyes. Competitive and close fight but Crawford was the clear winner
Bud Should have Turn back Right Handed after he got hit with the First Right Hand as long as his opponent had turned."
Bud's tampered gloves busted during the warm up that's why he wasn't as aggressive.
Wow…gaslighting the public. He lost. In every meaningful category he lost. Power punches lost. Percentage jabs lost power punch percentage lost. Total punch percentage lost. He took 23 more power punches to the head than Madrimov. Let that sink in. Free shots…power punches…to the head…23!!! By contrast Crawford’s one real win was 11 extra punches landed, all jabs, vs those 23 power punches to his head. He won? How? He didn’t control the fight. Madrimov was in front of him all night. Again for the math challenged… Crawford landed 21.9 % of all punches 17.9 of his jabs. So he won by missing 82% of his jabs and 78% of all his punches? Seriously…? You’re high!!! Madrimov controlled the fight. He wobbled Crawford in the 12th when Crawford tried to come after him, getting pot shot right the rest of the way, until the final 20 seconds when he finally engaged again. But you think he won? BS. I picked Crawford in this fight. If you’re honest you know he lost. And I’d bet dollars to dimes on a real punch stats breakdown instead of this fake compubox junk…he lost on that total also. It’s really pathetic people blowing all this smoke for him. This is what ruin’s boxing.
I don't see the argument for Crawford losing, let alone this big robbery that people are talking about.
I'm curious where you got all of the stats you used to prove your point if it was not Compubox?
Bud better than Mayweather took more risk dominated more no close fights didn't need rematch haven't seen no one dominated like bud or be avoided like bud or not duck like bud and pac ducked him till retirement canelo shouldn't be mentioned with great he a drug cheat duck fix fights gifted decisions gifted belts catch weight rehydration clauses he finnesed his whole career worse thing to happen to boxing
The commentators seem to be Crawford fans. It was an even fight. Crawford dominated the last rounds. He couldn't dominate the earlier rounds. Israel won here.
This is stupid and a analyzation of Crawford countering not of the fight
Total bullshit. Breadman disappoints. Crawford did fuck all till the end. AND THEN IT WASNT ALL THAT MUCH. American bias continues. The local fighter has all the advantages. The judges all gave the first 2 rounds to Crawford...yeah right.
Easten european fighters get ripped in America. Yet win all the olympic gold. Kovalev Ward. Ggg Canelo,.Loma Haney, Ortiz Bohucuk etc.
What did Madrimov do that was so convincing in the first two rounds? He was on the front foot pretty much all night, this is true. But he was not throwing or landing much. I think the first combination I saw him land was like the 7th round.
Listen he know you have to take the belt from the champ … Crawford didn’t beat him clearly… stop pernel Whitaker beat chavez & they gave chavez the fight so stop 🛑 sweet pee beat chavez clearly & lost so bread man stop 🛑 you just don’t want Crawford to hear you say he lost … thsts called being politically correct y’all guys on a buddy buddy plan get out of hear
Wow what koolaid are you drinking? Israil- no jab, no combinations. 270 punches for the whole fight. You are a Bud hater that’s all. Stop with your nonsense.
Wait, you're saying Crawford didn't win because he didn't "take the belt from the champ", then you use Sweet Pea vs Chavez to make your point?
You may want to rethink this comment.
@@runninreb9142 I’m sorry you have to be under 30 years old thinking like that … the new millennium boxers are watered down … they get the belt & then the next fight loose it … see in my error there was only 1-2 belts so you couldn’t duck if you wanted to be a champion… what’s happening right now with me & your conversation is like comparing Jordan to labron 2 different eras my time it was more competitive then now it’s to many belts so there not forced to fight each other… 👌🏾
@@larrytucker7763 I just wanted you to fact-check your comment.
The fight was scored a draw (which was still a robbery) and Sweet Pea was the champ.
So in this case the, not only did the challenger not clearly win, he clearly lost.
@@runninreb9142 bro what are you talking about you missed the yes whole point … have a nice day
Breadman is losing credibility, subjective analysis