Was Kylo Ren wasted?

Yes, Kylo Ren was wasted.
Kylo Ren, as a character in the Star Wars sequel trilogy, had immense potential and depth that was not fully realized in the films. His arc of redemption and internal struggle with the light and dark sides of the Force could have been a groundbreaking exploration of character development within the Star Wars universe. However, by ultimately killing off Kylo Ren in “The Rise of Skywalker,” the film squandered the opportunity to fully explore and capitalize on his complex narrative.
Kylo Ren’s unique portrayal as a conflicted villain who struggled to live up to the legacy of Darth Vader set him apart from traditional Star Wars antagonists. His internal turmoil and desire for redemption provided a fresh perspective on the classic battle between good and evil in the galaxy far, far away. The character’s evolution from Kylo Ren to Ben Solo hinted at a more nuanced exploration of identity and redemption that was cut short by his abrupt demise.
Furthermore, Ben Solo’s potential as a reformed character with a new path separate from the Jedi or Sith offered exciting storytelling possibilities for future Star Wars narratives. His redemption could have paved the way for a different kind of hero or anti-hero within the franchise, challenging established conventions and expanding the lore in unexpected ways.
In conclusion, Kylo Ren’s character was indeed wasted in the Star Wars sequel trilogy due to his premature death and missed opportunities for deeper exploration of his arc and potential impact on the franchise’s future
#starwars #darthvader #kyloren