Are you telling me that they filmed the entire moon landing in a blacked out plane, with fake lunar dust, and an artificial star. Damn that is dedication.
Yes of course, and they also found a way to show about 2 hours of uninterrupted footage where everything looked convincing enough to fool all physicists and geologists on Earth. In 1969.
@@Peter_1986 Don't forget the 850lbs of rocks, samples of which have been given to more than 1000 Universities to study, including some in Russia with access to the Russian samples for comparison.
@@frankfacts6207 Certainly I am, and I have more to tell you - they obviously sucked out the air from an incredibly fucking huge vacuum chamber and made sure to place that vacuum chamber somewhere on Earth so that nobody would ever find any trace of it. They also obviously managed to make everything look so realistic that not a single scientist anywhere on Earth has managed to find the slightest trace of any fakery whatsoever. Because you know, this would have been a hell of a lot easier than, oh, planning and preparing for a real moon landing, which is obviously impossible to do when you only have rockets that can blast into outer space and enter lunar orbit. Oh, and it's also impossible because we certainly don't have the skills to calculate mathematical and physical scenarios involving forces, accelerations and relative velocities, and we absolutely don't have any knowledge of chemical processes which would have allowed us to build rockets that behaved properly during takeoff. Science faked the moon landings! Science is a conspiracy theory!
@@frankfacts6207 In case it wasn't obvious from my last post, I was being sarcastic. Seriously though, I fully believe that the moon landings happened - I even study Engineering Physics - so don't worry.
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?
🙏🙏Blessings forever GOD loves y'all too forever tell everyone you know and don't know. Jesus loves y'all too forever. Teach everyone how to see and enjoy their blessings too forever😊
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?
@@pasisovi are you kidding me? Not serious is an understatement! This is complete mockery for the uneducated sheeple. Oh, they forgot to show that video when astronot on the Moon goes with the legs up first than comes his head up, just like it wud be if they were using harness, and the wire above their astronot heads is clearly visible on some shots, since George Reeves portrayed Superman in the 1950s, movies and TV shows have used an endless variety of wires, pans, and other rigs to lift actors up high, so they had all the technology and knowledge from the movies in 1969 to pull up a show no problem
❤ 🙏🙏Blessings forever GOD loves y'all too forever tell everyone you know and don't know. Jesus loves y'all too forever. Teach everyone how to see and enjoy their blessings too foreverm.
Fondel Maddick uh ok, I have looked at the facts and everything lines up that we did go to the moon. Why do you moon landing deniers even deny it, like what's the Fucking point?
@@TheHolyMongolEmpire A lot of people are uncomfortable with the fact that people have gone to the moon because they imagine that the moon is "unreachable". They also believe that the Van Allen belt would be instantly deadly to everyone, and don't realise that you would have to stay in that belt for many weeks before it actually became dangerous. There are also many phenomena on the moon that are unfamiliar to us - like for example the way that distant mountains look crystal clear because there is no atmosphere that obscures them, which gives you the illusion that they are much closer, and this will make it look like the foregrounds dramatically change in seemingly suspicious ways (like the LEM standing in different places relative to the background etc). Also, the radio antennas on the astronauts' backpacks are frequently mistaken for wires, especially when they cause lens flare and make light travel high up on the screen. Basically, people who deny the moon landings are unfamiliar with physics. This doesn't necessarily make them stupid, although it does make them very ignorant.
@@Peter_1986 I don't think claiming the moon landings are fake is based on any particular beliefs. The moon landings being fake is not a conclusion, but rather the starting point. They are seeking attention, not facts. Do they believe the VAB is deadly? No, and it's humorous they believe it exists at all.
🙏🙏Blessings forever GOD loves y'all too forever tell everyone you know and don't know. Jesus loves y'all too forever. Teach everyone how to see and enjoy their blessings too forever❤n
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?
🙏🙏Blessings forever GOD loves y'all too forever tell everyone you know and don't know. Jesus loves y'all too forever. Teach everyone how to see and enjoy their blessings too forever
@@yazzamx6380 it really saddens me to see so many people going around believing nonsense like we never went to the moon or the world is flat, at least its an easy way to identify who's an idiot. Like seriously it's one of if not the biggest achievement as a species at the time that we landed on another celestial body, more than once may I add, and then dumb people just come around and say: No WE neVeR WEnT TheRE, yoU aRe JuSt IgnoRAnt sHEEp that faLl foR a GovERmeNT's LiE!
@@lynnecartwright3976 Scientists all over the world used the retroreflectors to measure the distance to the moon very accurately. (They knew exactly where, on the surface of the moon, the retroreflectors were located. Do you think it was just a coincidence that they were located exactly where the astronauts walked?)
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?.
Here's how they could have got the fake moonwalk to look authentic, by filming it in artificial one-sixth gravity. But the problem then is that they would have had to design and build an aircraft large enough to contain the extensive area around which Armstrong and Aldrin were moving about during their moon-walk.
NASA knew they would’ve been caught in the future if they faked it so they didn’t besides if that was the case someone would’ve leaked it by now. We’re going to the moon in 4 years on the Artemis mission and they’ll show the site where Neil and Buzz once step on unless you want to claim that the astronauts going there put those “props” there
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?
Adam and Jamie should have worn spacesuits that showed the radio antennas, so that the conspiracy theorists couldn't quite as easily go on about "uuuh-duuuh there is a glimmering thing above the astronauts' heads sometimes, totally wires duh-huh!".
🙏🙏Blessings forever GOD loves y'all too forever tell everyone you know and don't know. Jesus loves y'all too forever. Teach everyone how to see and enjoy their blessings too forever😊
NASA states they lost the original film of the first step on the moon. NASA states they do not have the technology no more to go back to the moon. NASA has received how many millions of dollars and they can not remake the same technology to go back? They lost the original film ? WTF
Nope, NASA states they lost their BACKUP of the Apollo 11 moonwalk which was only made in case the live TV broadcast to the world failed (the broadcast worked and so their backup was redundant). And the technology to go back is the massive Saturn V rocket and space capsule. Now look up the massive SLS rocket due to launch next June which is as powerful as the Saturn V and scheduled to take people back to the moon in 2023, inside the Orion space capsule which was successfully tested in space in 2014. Finally, look at NASA's budget over the years to see if you can work out what made the Apollo missions possible :-) upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/09/NASA-Budget-Federal.svg
@@supercomputer0448 - Hi, the previous plan was for a manned mission around the moon in 2023/2024, followed by a landing on the moon in around 2028. The recently announced (back then) Artemis program skips over the orbital mission and goes straight to a manned landing in 2024. So if the Lunar Lander is not ready by 2024, then can still carry out the original orbital mission around the moon with the SLS and Orion until the lander is ready. So yes, I can't wait either :-)
The evidence ( air quotes) like the flag waving Is actually caused by the design of the flag. It was designed like a curtain so it could wave in low gravity.
I saw an interview with Adam where he said that the entire time they were taping for the show, he did not get sick. As soon as taping was done and he just got to do it for "fun" a couple times, he hurled. Jamie however, is OBVIOUSLY fighting nausea.
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?.
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?.
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?.
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?
I just realized that MB basically concluded the moon landings were not faked by filming themselves in an environment that allowed them to fake the moon's gravity... :p
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?.
Another way to look at it is truth, if something happened, it is true for everybody regardless if someone believes in it or not. Why is it true? Because it is an event.
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?.
I bet Neil is pissed if he watched this “I FUCKING RISKED MY LIFE TO GET THAT FEELING FOR 2 FUCKING MINUTES WHEN I COULD HAVE DONE IT FOR AN HOUR FOR $1000!?!?!”
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?.
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?.
Why are these folks (hoax folks?) completely incapable of testing anything themselves? My HS had a vacuum chamber and you can buy them on ebay, yet the world of hoaxers can't quite find one.
@@TexMex421 here ya go, dumby ruclips.net/video/8Cx9mNnky2U/видео.html Theres proof that rocket propulsion wouldnt work in a vacuum. Go ahead and try to shift the goal posts
@@TexMex421 Way easier to say somethings fake when you have no actual intelligence on the issue at hand then to have to put work into proving it's fake. All of these conspiracy nuts somehow think they know more than experts who have been studying and doing this stuff for decades but somehow professor google and facebook are always right.
BIOSHOCKFOXX that's exactly what happened...a couple years ago indeed i thought it had never happened...but then i started watching a lot of videos (all of them) about apollo moon flights and now i think the opposite there is no way they faked that shit just the way dust flies when the asronauts are operating on the surface of the moon you can't just ''fake'' physics like that.
If you haven't already seen it, search this great docu film title here: " *In The Shadow Of The Moon (2007) - HD* " About all of the Apollo missions. It probably won't be on youtube much longer before the copyright police block it.
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?.
Explain this to me. They were at 10 km of altitude. Earth gravity must be almost the same at that altitude that on ground, 9,8 on ground and maybe 9,7 at 10 km,, right? They should been at least at 6000 km altitude to feel a (9,8/6) gravity right???? At least you can see that on graph altitude VS earth gravity. So why do they say that they experiencing moon gravity? I Don t get it.
It has to do with the plane’s trajectory. The plane flys in a parabolic arc that will at certain points allow the people inside to experience different levels of gravity. Think of it kinda like how an elevator or steep hill on a road affects your gut, but on a much grander scale.
The plane that they’re on forms dips in the shape of a parabola. In their ascent the planes Gs increasing causing them to increase in weight, not mass. On the descent it’s basically vice versa. As for your distances from earth and the affect of gravitation, while it would be nearly the same, the planes trajectory was affecting its G force
Their spacesuits are not pressurized. Explain the photo of Buzz with his arm bent at a 90 degree angle? Explain all the wrinkles in the Apollo 11 spacesuits when they were on the moon.
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?
About half atmospheric pressure (like on a mountain) so the suits are easier to make, the spacecraft has less stress, and the air can have less Nitrogen - which is a waste because it does nothing. That's why it takes the astronauts ages to get in and out of the rocket because they have to convert o lower pressure. I now this because I tried to buy a space suit gloves once for vacuum work, but it doesn't do full earth air pressure (100kPa). Elbows and all joints (esp gloves) are spherical - much more complicated than a blow-up Covid research suit (which is super low pressure). That's why I was quoted about $20k for a space glove.
I’ve never met a person that thinks the moon landings were fake. If I actually meet one it will be the same day I lose faith in humans being an intelligent species.
Aaron Rainey: You obviously don't speak to many people then, or you never used ABC, Accept Nothing, Believe No One, Challenge Everything, then do your own research and then this will be the time you will loose faith in some human beings. Believe me we live in a wicked world.
*WHERE ARE THE STARS? ON THE MOON......YET ZERO PICS TAKEN SPECIFICALLY BACK AT THE STARS, TOWARDS EARTH?? "Oh gee, Buzz, I guess we forgot". SUUURRRRE! HAHAHAHAHAHA!*
Where are the stars in all these photographs of the full moon? goo.gl/UTD9oK I guess you think all the photographers forgot to put the stars in when they faked the moon photos, right? :-)
The moon is highly reflective. So much so that they had to adjust the exposure to deal with it. The stars are very faint in contrast. Try taking a picture of a street lamp at night. You won't be able to see the stars in the sky.
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?
@TheVMFA333 I agree. They wanted to land on the moon before the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union already had the first cosmonaut to be in space, it was only a matter of time before they landed on the moon. USA had to prove they were better, have one up on them.
hayleythekid these mythbusted's are disinformation whore's for Nasa. if you jump a foot high on earth, then if done on moon,you should go up 6 ft. the astronot's on film running was shown at half speed.put on full speed they look very terrestrial.
You'd think that their chief rival and mortal idealogical enemy, with the second largest military in the world and all their attendant surveillance capability, would be watching every single aspect of the moon landing, from beginning to end, and up to and including spies peppered throughout the American Space Program. You'd also think that if they had a shred of evidence proving ANY American shenanigans, that they would immediately trumpet it to the world. A PR coup, almost as good as a moon landing itself, and yet all they did was begrudgingly congratulate the Yanks. Then repeat this with every other technologically advanced country, who all heard signals from exactly where they were supposed to originate, saw engine burns where they were supposed to be seen and watched the capsule come in and be recovered.
And yet in all thoose years, the Russians have never challenged or disputed America's achievements? The very people who would have *the ultimate motivation* to do that very thing, who have proven time and time again that they are massively adept at espionage, and would've made even the hint of any such knowledge massively public the instant they had it? Nope, I guess the entire Russian nation has spent the last fifty-odd years just sitting around hoping that Chad the Loony Moony Conspiracist will eventually do all that hard work for them, after a marathon session of watching other Loony moony Conspiracists content from his basement bedroom. You go, Chad - make Russia proud!
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?.
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?
Nope. This episode was first broadcast 11 YEARS ago, more than enough time for others to carry out the SAME experiments to prove MythBusters wrong. So where are they? :-)
I have the chills right now because I always believe that they did not go to the moon but seeing that for myself completely changed my view that is 100% the walk that we see on the moon. It is possible that NASA knew that all these studies would be done and that wouldn't be hard for them it would be easier than going to the moon but now that's going on a whole different route it's easier just to believe they went to the moon right look forward to them going back with humans The shartemis one doesn't count
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?
My 80 year old uncle used to work for and at NASA , once once told us it all happened there at their huge chamber where they can simulate zero gravity ,among with other Hollywood staff it was all made possible, and some employees signed a document of confidentiality!☝🏻 he didn’t but he’s old school and only told us.
Except the moon has 1/6 gravity, not zero gravity, and it is impossible to recreate perfect 1/6 gravity on Earth, much less in a massive chamber. So clearly either your uncle is lying, or you are :-)
Suuuure, because that's EXACTLY how it works when you're employed by a government agency! "Would you like to sign this Offical Secrets Act document as part of your employment here? I mean, you don't HAVE to, it's ENTIRELY optional... sure, it would totally suck if any of our top-secret stufff ever got out to the public, or our enemies, but y'know, 'cest la vie and all that... can't have our employees feeling *pressured* into following vital national security protocols, can we?" Yeah, I must've just been feeling particularly magnanimous when I signed it during my time working for the Ministry of Defence - and all I ever did was order spare parts for warships and submarines! Your uncle was relying on the fact that you were kids, and would believe any old bullshit, most likely. Looks like he knew you pretty well!
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?
Also with the low gravity just 17% of earths when the rover drives at speed around the moon the dust the wheels throws up should be thrown up considerably more and yet it seems to rise no more than a foot or so before it quickly falls back to the ground in a second or two which mimics what dust would do in earth gravity less the slow motion filming of course even the dust the astronauts boots kick up acts the same way. No abuse in any replys please
You're not the first one to bring this up, and you're not the first one wrong about it. It shouldn't be "considerably more". It should be what we see on the footage.
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?.
@@jokiklos7009 _Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT_ Don Pettit is not a NASA spokesman. _said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon._ That is correct. The _Apollo_ program has been cancelled in 1972. _He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back._ No he didn't. The exact words he used were "it's a painful process to get it back". _NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels._ What's "telemity"? _They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!_ No, and no. They never said anything like that, and they didn't lose those. _Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed._ Y'know, except for the photos, films, flown and unflown hardware, equipment, lunar samples, patents, telemetry, witness statements, etc... _THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!_ No they didn't. They're still right where they should be. _When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?_ And when you get lied to on the internet and make an embarrassing post on YT, the results aren't pretty either.
Hi Sharron, you mention the dust thrown up by the Lunar Rover. The way this dust falls to the surface quickly without billowing up into a cloud is exactly what we would expect in a vacuum in the absence of air resistance. A perfect example of this is the "Rooster Tail" dust trails kicked up by Apollo 16's John Young during his "Grand Prix" in April 1972. This very situation has been analysed, studied and the published results are easily obtained online. "Ballistic motion of dust in the Lunar Roving Vehicle dust trails", Hsu, Hsiang-Wen, Horányi, Mihály, (University of Colorado), American Journal of Physics, Volume 80, Issue 5, pp. 452-456 (2012). They conclude that the lack of particles’ deceleration along the x-axis of their coordinate system, could only be the case if Apollo 16’s rover footage was filmed in a vacuum and in an environment where g = 1,6 m/s2. Enjoy reading, take care.
Ha - another hoaxer bites the dust. The rover dust is incredibly hard to fake in a movie because such fine dust (hoaxers claim they used cement dust) would hang around in the air for minutes - not fall back to the ground quickly like it does on the moon videos. I get clouds of cement dust every time I empty a cement bag, and it hangs around for a good minute and floats next door to annoy the neighbours. Dust is a very strong evidence of real moon landings, especially decades before anyone had that sort of computer graphics. Man, they didn't even have engineering CAD!
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?.
I just read an article about how they are have been working for years on the scaphandrier to be able to walk safely on the moon... so what about the ones of 1969? My old jacket of 1980 still protects me from the rain... Does that mean they lost the "technology" that was used then... Will be reassured when they again all walk on the moon;
Are you talking about the suit? The one they had for Apollo could only last a few hours at a time safely on the moon. The new missions are designed to last weeks. They didn't lose the tech. They're just making something better.
LOL! He did not want to bump his head. x= xo + vo(t) + 1/2(a)(t)(t). Take the square root of 6. and slow down, or speed up, depending on how you do it, and that is the slow motion to pretend being on the mooooon..... Where is the video showing the inside of them LEM with the astronauts in the moon suits and attached with the bungee cords. They had a periscope in the CSM and LEM for navigation, but for some reason there are no pictures or videosof stars. The second moment changes as the fuel and oxidizer gets used, but somehow these 4 groups of steering motors kept the LEM from crashing. No remote control or autopilot test landing to verify the LEMs control system and steering motors, with the sloshing fuel and oxidizer and water, but somehow they got it right the first time. The LEM simulator Neil flew and crashed obviously did not have the same second moment as the fake studio LEM on the moon stage. No radars on the moon to verify CSM orbit and LEM ignition. For the moon suit sublimator what blackbody absorber temperature did they use for outer space and the maximum power flux from the sun from the ultraviolet to infrared wavelengths. Same with the engine jet landing on the moon and the missing dust cloud and nobody afraid of rocks piercing the LEM or damage to the antennas, steering motors, or landing radar. They could have pointed the cameras up away from the moon instead of golfing on the moon stage but they decided not to because they would have taken pictures of the stage guys on the catwalk They also drove the moon buggy with lots of dust in the vacuum of the moon studio. Where is the video showing the astronauts in the LEM on the studio mooooon putting on their backpack life support. The clown did a fake spacewalk in the non gravity simulator in the airplane,but for some reason no stars in pictures or video from that. Their studio moon suits were contaminated with moon dust, which likely is radioactive, but no problem to put a Geiger counter next to their suits to verify there was no radiation hazard.Neil jumped off the studio LEM, but since it was live they could not slow down the speed by the square root of six, like the Six Million Dollar Man slow motion, because that would put the rest of their studio acting out of sync..Astronauts could not get more than 6 inches off the moon as they were hopping and walking and pretending to be on the moon stage. Radiation heat transfer on the LEM so they used a glycol cooling loop to radiate that heat back out into the air conditioned studio. Total hoax.
Sue - You said "LOL! He did not want to bump his head. x= xo + vo(t) + 1/2(a)(t)(t). Take the square root of 6. and slow down, or speed up, depending on how you do it, and that is the slow motion to pretend being on the mooooon....." Likewise my ignorant friend, that means to restore Apollo footage back to 'normal', then it must be sped up by 2.46 times to ensure the moon dust falls at the rate of the moon's gravity, and yet when we do that the astronaut's movements are clearly WRONG, they are so fast, like those old black and white Keystone Cops movies. For example: ruclips.net/video/axEFTsXlsfA/видео.html ruclips.net/video/CTgRnnHu590/видео.html ruclips.net/video/806QKgk2ANg/видео.html Therefore by your OWN argument you proved the footage can not be slow motion. So thanks for that :-)
Yazzam X: High guys! Do you remember the Six Million Dollar Man? Re-memeber the slow motion action scenes. Those were awesome, huh? Speed it up by the square root of 6 or play t back by the square root of 6. Do you know the difference between speed and acceleration and simple equations of straight line motion with constant acceleration. Remember Fdt=Mdv. You can do a Dirac Delta impulse thing if you want. What is your 4 year degree in? Have you ever been an observer at a criminal trial. You must be less naive and scrutinize the evidence better. Have you ever seen Fireball XL5? Farewell old friend.
@@suekennedy8917 - In other words, you couldn't counter the points I made proving the Apollo footage could not be slow motion. So thanks for effectively admitting that :-) And it's amusing you should be asking about degrees and trials when we had that discussion before, but then again, that tends to happen when you just mindlessly copy and paste from a collection of replies :-)
@@olstumpy3567 - Thanks my friend. I mostly post such information for others to read, since it's a waste of time trying to change the minds of those whose minds are made up already. But for those who are on the fence and/or are interested in the facts - they're the ones who I hope will get something out of my replies :-)
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?
History has many moving parts. My background is Portuguese and iam proud and love our Maritime heritage. It took us over a hundred years just to figure out how to get around Cape Bojador with many a shipwreck let alone the other shipwrecks from ancient Mariners. The point being your telling me the Apollo moon missions were a perfect 6 for 6 landing and take-off? Going to a place that's 250000 miles away with tangibles and intangibles never experienced in human history (that we know of)? We did go to the moon (crafts,probes, technology whatever you want to call them) but no MAN has ever walked on the moon and maybe never will, just like fish can't live without the ocean we can't live without the Earth and there is nothing wrong with that. There is a reason why the Earth has many protective layers ( ionasphere for example) to protect all the living organisms living and the biggest organism and there is also a reason we can't see these layers because unfortunately for us humans many things in this existence is beyond us.
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?
_The point being your telling me the Apollo moon missions were a perfect 6 for 6 landing and take-off?_ No they weren't. _Going to a place that's 250000 miles away with tangibles and intangibles never experienced in human history (that we know of)?_ Your personal incredulity is not evidence.
@@Jan_Strzelecki my personal beliefs made you respond to my comment. Did it make you feel better? Did it strengthen your beliefs? I haven't been to the moon and something tells me you haven't either. Send me a postcard when you get there.
@@robertmartins1712 _my personal beliefs made you respond to my comment._ Yes. Your personal beliefs. _Did it make you feel better?_ Not particularly. _Did it strengthen your beliefs?_ Not particularly, either. _I haven't been to the moon and something tells me you haven't either._ I haven't been to China either.
@@Jan_Strzelecki ah man don't forget the postcards I haven't been to China either. Btw do I have to do everything? This cut and paste shit boring. You should read wagging the moon doggie by David McGowan. Just fair warning though you can only read though if you are of Critical mind and objective thought and you got to have balls too.
Completely different. Planes achieve 1/6th gravity for about 20-30 seconds in a small confined space, whereas Apollo footage shows 1/6th gravity in uncut footage sometimes lasting over an hour in a huge environment. So if anything, that proves it cannot be faked on Earth and therefore Apollo footage must have been filmed in an environment with 1/6th gravity, and hence must have been filmed on the moon.
@Yazzam X If the movie business taught us something is that creative people can cheat the hell out of your senses. While I do believe they actually went there, I'm unsure if you can ever prove humans were really there.
@@alexmipego - My friend, one thing the movie business has also taught us is that once they can do something then they can continue doing it! :-) To this day, not even the world's BEST special effects experts working on sci-fi movies with the biggest budgets have ever recreated the perfect 1/6th gravity seen in hour upon hour of Apollo footage (with scenes lasting over an hour uncut). Only today can they get close to it with CGI, but even CGI doesn't look quite right (we're not quite there yet with CGI). Neither has the world's best illusionists ever recreated the perfect 1/6th gravity seen on stage (not even as a homage to Apollo). I've always said that we only need to see ONE example of a film maker recreating perfect 1/6th gravity here on Earth to the quality seen in Apollo footage in scenes lasting more than several seconds (such as 30 seconds uncut) to prove it could have been faked back then. Since no-one to date has been able to achieve perfect 1/6th gravity in a studio, then there's no reason to believe NASA could have achieved it way back in 1969 to 1972, and therefore from a film perspective alone that's enough to prove the footage was filmed in 1/6th gravity, and the only location known for the perfect 1/6th gravity seen is the moon :-)
@Yazzam X As I explained I do believe they went there. However take a closer look at your explanation. If you are saying NASA actually put someone on the Moon, it stands to reason they are automatically able to film anything at 1/6 gravity because to achieve that they don't need to go as far as the moon. Assume for example the Van Allen belt was impassable by humans, they could send a large ship high enough to get 1/6 gravity but before the belt. It would need a lot less fuel to stay at that altitude for hours, and they could film it there. All I'm saying is, you believe Hollywood is faking gravity, but you're basing that on images from NASA. IF those were fakes, there's a possibility that the Hollywood footage is more realistic than a faked NASA footage.
@@alexmipego - I know you said you believe they went, hence that's great I'm not questioning that. My point is that anyone claiming the footage could have been faked MUST prove it could have been faked, and to this day no-one has ever done that. It is impossible to achieve 1/6th gravity in the way you suggested for two main reasons; 1) Earth gravity approaches 1/6th of it's strength at an altitude of 5800 miles, which is within the inner Van Allen belt (the most dangerous region of the belts). 2) Spacecraft have to be in orbit around the Earth, resulting in weightless conditions. Another reason is that it's impossible to recreate an environment of the size seen in the Apollo footage inside a spacecraft. Some of the Apollo scenes has astronauts walking great distances away from the camera in the uncut footage, some even vanishing below the features of the landscape! So it can't be faked in Earth orbit. And no, I'm saying Hollywood has NEVER successfully faked perfect 1/6th gravity, which is why there are ZERO Apollo hoax videos showing clips from movies that they claim to be proof that it could have been faked on Earth. Instead they resort to vague claims about wires (but can never say how many or where exactly they are attached) or slow motion, but can't explain why speeding the film up to make the dust match Earth's gravity causes the astronauts to move too fast. The Apollo footage even has scientific papers analyzing the footage, such as analysis of the dust thrown up by the lunar rover wheels. So the bottom line is - Until someone can present footage filmed here on Earth that matches the perfect 1/6th gravity seen in Apollo footage as I stated earlier, then claims that the footage was faked remains unfounded.
No pressing need. Been there, done that. Space exploration has been focusing on more distant objects like Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Pluto, asteroids, comets, etc., which are also less risky and less costly than sending humans to the moon.
Sounds like a great idea! Who are the 2 clowns? How can they get into Apollo 11? Did you know the Apollo 1 LEM hatch was too small to go though in a spacesuit! 2' circle!
3:10 Nice safety lines! Plus with their amaaaazing special effects skills, it's incredible they do not even as much as TOUCH the frontscreen projection lines!
They had cables that reduced gravity to 1/6th so of course it's gonna be similar whether done in a plane or on the ground. This doesn't prove anything.
And were all the grains of dust suspended on cables too? :-) In the Apollo footage, the astronauts could not move their feet without their boots kicking dust up and around, and yet the dust ALWAYS fell at the rate of the moon's gravity with zero air resistance. Therefore the idea that 1/6th gravity was achieved using cables is debunked by the dust. And if you want to claim they used slow motion, then to restore the falling moon dust to the rate of Earth's gravity, then the footage would need to be sped up by 2.46 times (the square root of 6). Not by 1.5 times, not by 2 times, but by 2.46 times to match Earth's gravity. However, when Apollo footage is fed up by 2.46 times to make the dust match Earth's gravity, the movements of the astronauts are ridiculously fast, making them appear more like the Key Stone cops in those old black and white silent movies. Therefore neither slow motion nor cables would work, that's why in all these decades since the moon landings, not even the world's best special effects experts with the highest budgets available to them have ever recreated perfect 1/6th gravity in a studio for sci-fi films or TV series.
@@yazzamx6380 yup you're absolutely correct. Today its not possible to simulate gravity on a scientific level without parabolic flight. In 1969 they didn't have near the technology to do so even on a practical level.. Also at 2:48 you can see that Adam rotates with his whole body by the center of his mass, you can not do this if you are on ground level attached with strings, you're rotation would be directly affected by the string that you are attached to. And lastly being up suspended makes you a lot stiffer in your legs, meaning you wouldn't bend them as much, If you look at the apollo footage you can see the astronauts are bending their legs.
@@yazzamx6380 I see you got no hoaxers replying to your comment because you explained the physics perfectly. The last paragraph interferes with their world view and therefore must be ignored.
Mythbusters , how much did NASA pay you to cover up their LIES ? Jamie Hyneman , get rid of the moustache and goatee. You look like the gay biker with the leathers, in the movie Police Academy, dancing with Mahoney in the BLUE OYSTER BAR.
Baseless accusations doesn't prove them wrong my friend. This episode of MythBusters was first broadcast just over 10 YEARS ago, plenty of time for others to carry out the same experiments to prove them wrong, and yet that hasn't happened :-)
@@yazzamx6380 Don't allow PATRIOTISM to stand in your way of the TRUTH ! You believe these 2 STOOGES who was paid by NASA to cover up there LIES? This is just one of thousands of evidence that NASA faked the Apollo Moon Landings..., ruclips.net/video/x1atbdcGWgs/видео.html
@@odysseuspsarros4695 - I'm not American... Anyway, here's a video that shows how the film maker Bart Sibrel caught you hook, line and sinker my friend :-) [2 links to the same video follows] ruclips.net/video/RKkpfYUhkig/видео.html www.dailymotion.com/video/x2zt9g6 The audio was recently broken in the original RUclips upload, therefore I included the dailymotion link too. And look at the flag claim in your video at 0:13 ( ruclips.net/video/x1atbdcGWgs/видео.html ), claiming air currents probably from air conditioners were responsible for the flag waving. Now LOOK at the FULL scene of the flag being deployed that the film maker Bart Sibrel didn't show you; ruclips.net/video/kJiv23TX_kw/видео.html As you watch that footage, don't focus on the flag but focus instead on the extremely fine dust kicked around by the astronaut's boots. Do I *really* need to explain why the dust proves there are no air currents blowing through that scene, much less air currents strong enough to move the flag? Do I *really* need to explain when and why we see the flag moving and when and why we see the flag remaining still? I'm not saying you should now change your mind nor am I saying that proving a hoax claim is wrong means men landed on the moon, all I'm saying is that *you shouldn't assume that hoax believers are angels who cannot be wrong, cannot make mistakes, cannot deceive and cannot deliberately lie.* Because to do so exposes you to being manipulated by the very same people you trust.
@@suekennedy8917 - Another typically ignorant reply from you Sue:-) The astronauts were clear when they could see stars and when they couldn't. For example, from Michael Collins 1974 book "Carrying The Fire" (you do know who Michael Collins is, right?); [When in orbit around the earth] Quote: "...Out from behind the shadow of the earth, we are into the constant sunlight...Towards the sun, nothing can be seen but its blinding disk, whereas down-sun there is simply a black void. The stars are there, but they cannot be seen because, with sunlight flooding the spacecraft, the pupil of the eye involuntarily contracts, and the light from the stars is too dim to compete with the reflected sunlight, as both enter the eye through the tiny aperture formed by the contracted pupil. No, to see the stars, the pupil must be allowed to relax, to open wide enough to let the starlight form a visible image on the retina, and that can be done only by blocking out the sunlight...". [When entering the shadow of the moon] Quote: "...To add to the dramatic effect, we find we can see the stars again. We are in the shadow of the moon now, in darkness for the first time in three days, and the elusive stars have reappeared as if called especially for this occasion...". [With Neil and Buzz on the surface and whilst in the shadow of the moon] Quote: "...Outside my window I can see stars - and that is all. Where I know the moon to be, there is simply a black void; the moon's presence is defined solely by the absence of stars". That is consistent with everything we've heard from Neil and Buzz and other astronauts since then. Next?
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?.
Just because your "moon walk" experience in the "vomit commit" was similar, or just the same, as the actual moon walk does not necessarily mean that the "actornauts" actually walked on the moon. This simply proves that the moon walk very well could have been staged through the use of wire harnesses suspending the actors on a television set. Recording them in a similar fashion with the gravitational forces experienced on the vomit commit would not have been difficult with the intentional deception of them being on the surface of the moon. Come on Mythbusters, I had more confidence in your abilities to get at the real truth!
You said "This simply proves that the moon walk very well could have been staged through the use of wire harnesses suspending the actors on a television set." No it doesn't my friend :-) Watch this footage of the Apollo 17 flag being deployed, where conspiracy theorists like to cherry pick clips from this footage to claim the flag is blowing in the wind, for which the incredibly fine dust on the surface proves there's no wind blowing. ruclips.net/video/kJiv23TX_kw/видео.html The kicked up dust particles falls back down with zero air resistance in the 1/6 gravity of the moon, which is something we see in hour after hour of Apollo surface footage, i.e. the lunar dust falling at the rate of the moon's gravity no matter how high it is thrown up! So was each grain of dust suspended on a wire harness too? :-)
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?.
Yeah, they went through all that raditation in a contraption that had walls made out of tin foil. So thin, that one of the apollo astronauts said you could of poked your finger through it. Yet we are to believe they went through the van allen belts in that bullshit? Going at speeds faster than our planes on earth. Lol.
They were NOT inside the Lunar Module when traveling through the belts. They were inside the conically shaped Command Module, the craft with the THICK hull that lands in the sea upon return. Hence please look at this 4 minute animation of the moon landing to see how it all worked; ruclips.net/video/8VvfTY-tVzI/видео.html Also, why do you believe NASA when they say there are invisible belts of radiation around the Earth, but you don't believe the SAME NASA when they say the SAME invisible belts of radiation are not a problem to pass through in just a few hours? :-) Btw, the LM was not a fragile craft as claimed, it was a very solid and sturdy craft.
@@yazzamx6380 im sorry. I apreciate your words. But nothing you said changed what i believe. What i said was just a fraction of why this moon landing is bs. And you can claim all you want the moon lander was sturdy and put together well lol. Its a joke to think that in the 60s we went but cant go no more because we "destroyed the technology" gtfoh
@@shayawnyahyapour1998 - I'm not trying to change your mind, I'm simply pointing out your numerous errors due to you blindly believing conspiracy theorists :-) NASA got men to the moon in the 60s with a blank cheque from Congress to build and launch the largest and the most powerful rocket in history, the Saturn V. After the Saturn V was retired, name the rocket capable of accelerating a manned craft to 25,000 mph to break Earth's gravity to send it to the moon. Misquoting the "destroyed technology" nonsense doesn't make your case. Late this year (or in 2020) we'll see the launch of NASA's massive SLS rocket which will take the Orion space capsule around the moon and back to Earth. In 2023, the SLS is scheduled to AGAIN take Orion around the moon, but this time with a crew of astronauts on a mission lasting 8 to 21 days. That's called rebuilding the technology using modern materials and techniques :-)
Aha now we really know how they did it. The walk & leap on the moon is different from the walk and leap of the mythbusters while on the plane. The walk and leap on theplane is more fluid while the walk & leap on the moon seems bumpy and more like to be hanging on wires? The difference is overwhelming. Do it again guys. Maybe the next time, you'll be able to copy the walk on the moon.
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?.
How can you ' bust a myth' without actually doing it, in other words they never went to the moon to confirm or disprove the moon landing so how can they confirm the moon landing if they never went to the moon.
NASA knew they would’ve been caught in the future if they faked it so they didn’t besides if that was the case someone would’ve leaked it by now. We’re going to the moon in 4 years on the Artemis mission and they’ll show the site where Neil and Buzz once step on unless you want to claim that the astronauts going there put those “props” there
You think they had the budget to go to the moon??? You think they could just ask NASA to let them on the moon for a TV show? They work with what they’ve got, they always have. They’ve done myths involving getting shot, are you going to demand they ACTUALLY shoot someone to prove or disprove it?
Magic Rooster. You'll need some medieval magic to fake the 1/6 gravity in a vacuum accurately.LOL If you can match the predictable and calculable Newtonian physics of the astronauts and inanimate objects' movements on the lunar surface,I'll write you a check for $100,000 dollars.Impossible.Period.Let me know when you are ready to call NASA out. Here duplicate this RUclips clip .Apollo 15 in 60fps: Rover Traverse To Station 4 ruclips.net/video/boFZ3cAws20/видео.html
Are you telling me that they filmed the entire moon landing in a blacked out plane, with fake lunar dust, and an artificial star. Damn that is dedication.
Yes of course, and they also found a way to show about 2 hours of uninterrupted footage where everything looked convincing enough to fool all physicists and geologists on Earth.
In 1969.
@@Peter_1986 Don't forget the 850lbs of rocks, samples of which have been given to more than 1000 Universities to study, including some in Russia with access to the Russian samples for comparison.
@@Peter_1986 you're full of equal parts self and shit
@@frankfacts6207
Certainly I am, and I have more to tell you - they obviously sucked out the air from an incredibly fucking huge vacuum chamber and made sure to place that vacuum chamber somewhere on Earth so that nobody would ever find any trace of it.
They also obviously managed to make everything look so realistic that not a single scientist anywhere on Earth has managed to find the slightest trace of any fakery whatsoever.
Because you know, this would have been a hell of a lot easier than, oh, planning and preparing for a real moon landing, which is obviously impossible to do when you only have rockets that can blast into outer space and enter lunar orbit.
Oh, and it's also impossible because we certainly don't have the skills to calculate mathematical and physical scenarios involving forces, accelerations and relative velocities, and we absolutely don't have any knowledge of chemical processes which would have allowed us to build rockets that behaved properly during takeoff.
Science faked the moon landings!
Science is a conspiracy theory!
@@frankfacts6207
In case it wasn't obvious from my last post, I was being sarcastic.
Seriously though, I fully believe that the moon landings happened - I even study Engineering Physics - so don't worry.
I sometimes forget how ripped Jamie is, I remember when he was cutting that wood with his shirt off, I envy his back lmao
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?
🙏🙏Blessings forever GOD loves y'all too forever tell everyone you know and don't know. Jesus loves y'all too forever. Teach everyone how to see and enjoy their blessings too forever😊
You can send a moon truther to the moon and they wouldn't believe it.
You can literally hit their heads against the lander, so even in a vacuum there's still a hollow sound. They still wouldn't believe it.
So that's what it feels like to have a jump boost in Minecraft
bringing these guys under the spotlight shows how Discovery Channel is NOT serious
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?
@@pasisovi are you kidding me? Not serious is an understatement! This is complete mockery for the uneducated sheeple. Oh, they forgot to show that video when astronot on the Moon goes with the legs up first than comes his head up, just like it wud be if they were using harness, and the wire above their astronot heads is clearly visible on some shots, since George Reeves portrayed Superman in the 1950s, movies and TV shows have used an endless variety of wires, pans, and other rigs to lift actors up high, so they had all the technology and knowledge from the movies in 1969 to pull up a show no problem
❤ 🙏🙏Blessings forever GOD loves y'all too forever tell everyone you know and don't know. Jesus loves y'all too forever. Teach everyone how to see and enjoy their blessings too foreverm.
They went to the moon. Deal with it.
They didn't, study real facts, and deal with that.
Fondel Maddick uh ok, I have looked at the facts and everything lines up that we did go to the moon. Why do you moon landing deniers even deny it, like what's the Fucking point?
@@TheHolyMongolEmpire
A lot of people are uncomfortable with the fact that people have gone to the moon because they imagine that the moon is "unreachable".
They also believe that the Van Allen belt would be instantly deadly to everyone, and don't realise that you would have to stay in that belt for many weeks before it actually became dangerous.
There are also many phenomena on the moon that are unfamiliar to us - like for example the way that distant mountains look crystal clear because there is no atmosphere that obscures them, which gives you the illusion that they are much closer, and this will make it look like the foregrounds dramatically change in seemingly suspicious ways (like the LEM standing in different places relative to the background etc).
Also, the radio antennas on the astronauts' backpacks are frequently mistaken for wires, especially when they cause lens flare and make light travel high up on the screen.
Basically, people who deny the moon landings are unfamiliar with physics.
This doesn't necessarily make them stupid, although it does make them very ignorant.
@@Peter_1986 I don't think claiming the moon landings are fake is based on any particular beliefs. The moon landings being fake is not a conclusion, but rather the starting point. They are seeking attention, not facts. Do they believe the VAB is deadly? No, and it's humorous they believe it exists at all.
@@fondelmaddick5085 We don't need to prove that men went to the moon, that's the commonly accepted fact. You prove that we didn't go, fucking dumbass.
We all know it was faked! But the film director was so particular he demanded they shoot the moon hoax on location.......
Aaron no it was not the did not have the tech in 69 to fake it
@@eddiehemberger whoosh
It was too convincing! They literally went and did it, the madlads!
Aaron You doubt the viciousness of America to lie? I’m not a conspiracy theorist I’m just black.
Dear God this joke is old. Now everyone go watch it the documentary called American Moon.
They don't know the moonlanding was all done with puppets in my uncles garage
🙏🙏Blessings forever GOD loves y'all too forever tell everyone you know and don't know. Jesus loves y'all too forever. Teach everyone how to see and enjoy their blessings too forever❤n
Not even an idiot would believe you. 🤣
The conspiracy is that these guys gets to try cool stuff in the name of science... Damn I envy you
Envy is a sin
bringing these guys under the spotlight shows how Discovery Channel is NOT serious
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?
🙏🙏Blessings forever GOD loves y'all too forever tell everyone you know and don't know. Jesus loves y'all too forever. Teach everyone how to see and enjoy their blessings too forever
The retroreflectors are the easiest way to prove that they walked on the moon.
Hoax believers will claim otherwise, except their claims don't hold up to scrutiny :-)
@@yazzamx6380 it really saddens me to see so many people going around believing nonsense like we never went to the moon or the world is flat, at least its an easy way to identify who's an idiot. Like seriously it's one of if not the biggest achievement as a species at the time that we landed on another celestial body, more than once may I add, and then dumb people just come around and say:
No WE neVeR WEnT TheRE, yoU aRe JuSt IgnoRAnt sHEEp that faLl foR a GovERmeNT's LiE!
@@sixela2268 - I couldn't agree more. Well said my friend :-)
How?
@@lynnecartwright3976 Scientists all over the world used the retroreflectors to measure the distance to the moon very accurately. (They knew exactly where, on the surface of the moon, the retroreflectors were located. Do you think it was just a coincidence that they were located exactly where the astronauts walked?)
wow, so awesome..!
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?.
Here's how they could have got the fake moonwalk to look authentic, by filming it in artificial one-sixth gravity. But the problem then is that they would have had to design and build an aircraft large enough to contain the extensive area around which Armstrong and Aldrin were moving about during their moon-walk.
NASA knew they would’ve been caught in the future if they faked it so they didn’t besides if that was the case someone would’ve leaked it by now. We’re going to the moon in 4 years on the Artemis mission and they’ll show the site where Neil and Buzz once step on unless you want to claim that the astronauts going there put those “props” there
@@ShipMyPants they should fix the flag while they're at it
@@jeremydyar7566 nothing wrong with the flag
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?
@@insurgentleman It fell down at liftoff from exhaust gases because it was too close to the module.
@Asiablue A Man on the Moon, published in 1994, Andrew Chaikin
Adam and Jamie should have worn spacesuits that showed the radio antennas, so that the conspiracy theorists couldn't quite as easily go on about "uuuh-duuuh there is a glimmering thing above the astronauts' heads sometimes, totally wires duh-huh!".
🙏🙏Blessings forever GOD loves y'all too forever tell everyone you know and don't know. Jesus loves y'all too forever. Teach everyone how to see and enjoy their blessings too forever😊
NASA states they lost the original film of the first step on the moon. NASA states they do not have the technology no more to go back to the moon.
NASA has received how many millions of dollars and they can not remake the same technology to go back? They lost the original film ? WTF
So you didn't watch the video then.
Nope, NASA states they lost their BACKUP of the Apollo 11 moonwalk which was only made in case the live TV broadcast to the world failed (the broadcast worked and so their backup was redundant).
And the technology to go back is the massive Saturn V rocket and space capsule. Now look up the massive SLS rocket due to launch next June which is as powerful as the Saturn V and scheduled to take people back to the moon in 2023, inside the Orion space capsule which was successfully tested in space in 2014.
Finally, look at NASA's budget over the years to see if you can work out what made the Apollo missions possible :-)
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/09/NASA-Budget-Federal.svg
@@yazzamx6380 hm I thought it was 2024. Can't wait! This is not sarcasm though it may sound that way.
@@supercomputer0448 - Hi, the previous plan was for a manned mission around the moon in 2023/2024, followed by a landing on the moon in around 2028. The recently announced (back then) Artemis program skips over the orbital mission and goes straight to a manned landing in 2024. So if the Lunar Lander is not ready by 2024, then can still carry out the original orbital mission around the moon with the SLS and Orion until the lander is ready. So yes, I can't wait either :-)
@@yazzamx6380 never seen such a super shill
The evidence ( air quotes) like the flag waving Is actually caused by the design of the flag. It was designed like a curtain so it could wave in low gravity.
lol u idiot
Sean Hartnett no
If you are talking to me, and saying I am wrong you are the idiot.
Sean Hartnett uh duh of course I'm talking to you idiot stupidity dummy moron
Israel Garza so I am the idiot for believing the truth.
I saw an interview with Adam where he said that the entire time they were taping for the show, he did not get sick. As soon as taping was done and he just got to do it for "fun" a couple times, he hurled. Jamie however, is OBVIOUSLY fighting nausea.
that is one thing i have to do before i die :O
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?.
if we never been to the moon then explain the old man that lives on it!!! thats what i thought
Dwl hahahahahahahahhaaaaa
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?.
The irony of them using fakery, in attempt to disprove fakery🤣
what fakery😂😂
@@vanne-necashionofbread9095 Both fakeries.
@TheVMFA333 This is a book about actually going to the moon. Do you believe they went? Or not?
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?.
@hayleythekid Right on!
What if the NASA backpacks are full of hydrogen lmao
shout out to the bad ass pilot on that plane!
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?
Just came here to see how ridiculous conspiracy theorist are 😂😂😂
Riding the vomit commit is so cool.
I just realized that MB basically concluded the moon landings were not faked by filming themselves in an environment that allowed them to fake the moon's gravity... :p
Moon landing conspiracy theorists having more sleepless nights with Artemis, let's pray for them :-)
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?.
It’s easier to just go to the moon instead of faking it
Well said!
Another way to look at it is truth, if something happened, it is true for everybody regardless if someone believes in it or not. Why is it true? Because it is an event.
It's found out on 2000's, theory conspiracy 'Moon landing hoax'
Yes I'm agree, this is the best prove of the moon landing.
That's one small step for Adam... One gaint leap for adamkind
I have an Adam over here who approves this message
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?.
so, kangaroos are going to conquer space
I bet Neil is pissed if he watched this “I FUCKING RISKED MY LIFE TO GET THAT FEELING FOR 2 FUCKING MINUTES WHEN I COULD HAVE DONE IT FOR AN HOUR FOR $1000!?!?!”
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?
the moon is FLAT
so is earth
Lmaooo
@@powerofone1645 your joking right?
Myth busters? I knew they would do the silly hop
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?.
0:38, this scene makes me laugh
Wow, Mythbusters went to the moon the same way NASA sent the others to the moon.
Wow, you are indeed gullible, aren't you?
Now that looks fun, and I get to prove idiots that they are wrong while doing it, want to try at least once in my life
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?
Kangaroos came from the moon.
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?.
Hey Mythbusters, can you wear those suits in a vacuum for us? Some folks know it's not possible. They need your help on this.
Why are these folks (hoax folks?) completely incapable of testing anything themselves? My HS had a vacuum chamber and you can buy them on ebay, yet the world of hoaxers can't quite find one.
@@TexMex421 Same goes for a brain.
@@TexMex421 here ya go, dumby
ruclips.net/video/8Cx9mNnky2U/видео.html
Theres proof that rocket propulsion wouldnt work in a vacuum. Go ahead and try to shift the goal posts
@jkjk701 Two components in rocket propulsion; fuel and ________
And the answer is?
@@TexMex421 Way easier to say somethings fake when you have no actual intelligence on the issue at hand then to have to put work into proving it's fake. All of these conspiracy nuts somehow think they know more than experts who have been studying and doing this stuff for decades but somehow professor google and facebook are always right.
they went to the mon and it's awesome !
+Tech Wiz Master It sounds like you didn't believed before but just wanted to believe...and now it was confirmed to you...
BIOSHOCKFOXX
that's exactly what happened...a couple years ago indeed i thought it had never happened...but then i started watching a lot of videos (all of them) about apollo moon flights and now i think the opposite there is no way they faked that shit just the way dust flies when the asronauts are operating on the surface of the moon you can't just ''fake'' physics like that.
If you haven't already seen it, search this great docu film title here: " *In The Shadow Of The Moon (2007) - HD* " About all of the Apollo missions.
It probably won't be on youtube much longer before the copyright police block it.
They didn't go to the mon. Poke mon wouldn't be invented till 1990
They went to the moooooovie studio and messed up on the lighting. Look at the shadows at 11m 45s.
Yes moon I agree
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?.
Explain this to me. They were at 10 km of altitude. Earth gravity must be almost the same at that altitude that on ground, 9,8 on ground and maybe 9,7 at 10 km,, right? They should been at least at 6000 km altitude to feel a (9,8/6) gravity right???? At least you can see that on graph altitude VS earth gravity. So why do they say that they experiencing moon gravity? I Don t get it.
It has to do with the plane’s trajectory. The plane flys in a parabolic arc that will at certain points allow the people inside to experience different levels of gravity. Think of it kinda like how an elevator or steep hill on a road affects your gut, but on a much grander scale.
The plane that they’re on forms dips in the shape of a parabola. In their ascent the planes Gs increasing causing them to increase in weight, not mass. On the descent it’s basically vice versa. As for your distances from earth and the affect of gravitation, while it would be nearly the same, the planes trajectory was affecting its G force
The aircraft "creates" negative gravity by diving at the speed that an object falls at. It's as simple as that.
Their spacesuits are not pressurized. Explain the photo of Buzz with his arm bent at a 90 degree angle? Explain all the wrinkles in the Apollo 11 spacesuits when they were on the moon.
Crypto Jack And why did they jump on the moon like cheese puffs?
Shut the heck up you stupid idiot. It’s been three years since this comment. Have you grown up and realized how stupid you were?
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?
About half atmospheric pressure (like on a mountain) so the suits are easier to make, the spacecraft has less stress, and the air can have less Nitrogen - which is a waste because it does nothing. That's why it takes the astronauts ages to get in and out of the rocket because they have to convert o lower pressure. I now this because I tried to buy a space suit gloves once for vacuum work, but it doesn't do full earth air pressure (100kPa). Elbows and all joints (esp gloves) are spherical - much more complicated than a blow-up Covid research suit (which is super low pressure). That's why I was quoted about $20k for a space glove.
I’ve never met a person that thinks the moon landings were fake. If I actually meet one it will be the same day I lose faith in humans being an intelligent species.
Aaron Rainey: You obviously don't speak to many people then, or you never used ABC, Accept Nothing, Believe No One, Challenge Everything, then do your own research and then this will be the time you will loose faith in some human beings. Believe me we live in a wicked world.
NASA used wires in a studio to film the apollo 14 and 17 "landing"
Nope. Next? :-)
If you could show some evidence, that'd be great
@@Ami-km8sd there were hundred of video evidences at 2000's, but youtube had deleted it
@@qiecell1943 The first youtube video is from 2005 LUL
*WHERE ARE THE STARS? ON THE MOON......YET ZERO PICS TAKEN SPECIFICALLY BACK AT THE STARS, TOWARDS EARTH?? "Oh gee, Buzz, I guess we forgot". SUUURRRRE! HAHAHAHAHAHA!*
Where are the stars in all these photographs of the full moon?
goo.gl/UTD9oK
I guess you think all the photographers forgot to put the stars in when they faked the moon photos, right? :-)
ruclips.net/video/3ksUQfEzMoM/видео.html
The moon is highly reflective. So much so that they had to adjust the exposure to deal with it. The stars are very faint in contrast. Try taking a picture of a street lamp at night. You won't be able to see the stars in the sky.
They could have attempted but was not succesful and finished the moonlanding in the studio.That was one possibility.
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?
Lmao you got jokes
American Moon:Massimo Mazzucco! And you see its FAKE! Just like Mythbusters...
Nope. All debunked.
@TheVMFA333
I agree. They wanted to land on the moon before the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union already had the first cosmonaut to be in space, it was only a matter of time before they landed on the moon. USA had to prove they were better, have one up on them.
hayleythekid these mythbusted's are disinformation whore's for Nasa. if you jump a foot high on earth, then if done on moon,you should go up 6 ft. the astronot's on film running was shown at half speed.put on full speed they look very terrestrial.
You'd think that their chief rival and mortal idealogical enemy, with the second largest military in the world and all their attendant surveillance capability, would be watching every single aspect of the moon landing, from beginning to end, and up to and including spies peppered throughout the American Space Program. You'd also think that if they had a shred of evidence proving ANY American shenanigans, that they would immediately trumpet it to the world. A PR coup, almost as good as a moon landing itself, and yet all they did was begrudgingly congratulate the Yanks. Then repeat this with every other technologically advanced country, who all heard signals from exactly where they were supposed to originate, saw engine burns where they were supposed to be seen and watched the capsule come in and be recovered.
@@georgeburke4575 such a fucking toddler
And yet in all thoose years, the Russians have never challenged or disputed America's achievements? The very people who would have *the ultimate motivation* to do that very thing, who have proven time and time again that they are massively adept at espionage, and would've made even the hint of any such knowledge massively public the instant they had it? Nope, I guess the entire Russian nation has spent the last fifty-odd years just sitting around hoping that Chad the Loony Moony Conspiracist will eventually do all that hard work for them, after a marathon session of watching other Loony moony Conspiracists content from his basement bedroom. You go, Chad - make Russia proud!
whats the myth?
@Northstarrr thx!
bringing these guys under the spotlight shows how Discovery Channel is NOT serious
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?.
Sceptical people still think it's "fake." It isn't.
Those aren't skeptical people; they're denialists. Skeptics accept things that are well evidenced, and that includes the moon landings.
Oh yeah it sure is fake 1000%
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?
Yep it's fake as the tooth fairy
They go to Nasa to debunk it..like going to OJ for proof :D
Nope. This episode was first broadcast 11 YEARS ago, more than enough time for others to carry out the SAME experiments to prove MythBusters wrong. So where are they? :-)
Great show (MythBusters)but why would i believe them debunking the conspiracy truthers when their both special effects guys!HELLO!??!
These comments are cancer
ikr
No, just really stupid.
I have the chills right now because I always believe that they did not go to the moon but seeing that for myself completely changed my view that is 100% the walk that we see on the moon.
It is possible that NASA knew that all these studies would be done and that wouldn't be hard for them it would be easier than going to the moon but now that's going on a whole different route it's easier just to believe they went to the moon right look forward to them going back with humans
The shartemis one doesn't count
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?
@@jokiklos7009 Jo, repeating your flawed assertions isn't going to make them any less false.
My 80 year old uncle used to work for and at NASA , once once told us it all happened there at their huge chamber where they can simulate zero gravity ,among with other Hollywood staff it was all made possible, and some employees signed a document of confidentiality!☝🏻 he didn’t but he’s old school and only told us.
Except the moon has 1/6 gravity, not zero gravity, and it is impossible to recreate perfect 1/6 gravity on Earth, much less in a massive chamber. So clearly either your uncle is lying, or you are :-)
Sounds like someone having some fun with the "simpler" side of the family....
Suuuure, because that's EXACTLY how it works when you're employed by a government agency! "Would you like to sign this Offical Secrets Act document as part of your employment here? I mean, you don't HAVE to, it's ENTIRELY optional... sure, it would totally suck if any of our top-secret stufff ever got out to the public, or our enemies, but y'know, 'cest la vie and all that... can't have our employees feeling *pressured* into following vital national security protocols, can we?" Yeah, I must've just been feeling particularly magnanimous when I signed it during my time working for the Ministry of Defence - and all I ever did was order spare parts for warships and submarines!
Your uncle was relying on the fact that you were kids, and would believe any old bullshit, most likely. Looks like he knew you pretty well!
Liar liar, liar.
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?
As far as your concerned they went to the moon. BSact
@Asiablue drink your koolaid, i'm texting real people..
Also with the low gravity just 17% of earths when the rover drives at speed around the moon the dust the wheels throws up should be thrown up considerably more and yet it seems to rise no more than a foot or so before it quickly falls back to the ground in a second or two which mimics what dust would do in earth gravity less the slow motion filming of course even the dust the astronauts boots kick up acts the same way. No abuse in any replys please
You're not the first one to bring this up, and you're not the first one wrong about it.
It shouldn't be "considerably more". It should be what we see on the footage.
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?.
@@jokiklos7009 _Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT_
Don Pettit is not a NASA spokesman.
_said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon._
That is correct. The _Apollo_ program has been cancelled in 1972.
_He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back._
No he didn't. The exact words he used were "it's a painful process to get it back".
_NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels._
What's "telemity"?
_They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!_
No, and no. They never said anything like that, and they didn't lose those.
_Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed._
Y'know, except for the photos, films, flown and unflown hardware, equipment, lunar samples, patents, telemetry, witness statements, etc...
_THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!_
No they didn't. They're still right where they should be.
_When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?_
And when you get lied to on the internet and make an embarrassing post on YT, the results aren't pretty either.
Hi Sharron, you mention the dust thrown up by the Lunar Rover. The way this dust falls to the surface quickly without billowing up into a cloud is exactly what we would expect in a vacuum in the absence of air resistance. A perfect example of this is the "Rooster Tail" dust trails kicked up by Apollo 16's John Young during his "Grand Prix" in April 1972. This very situation has been analysed, studied and the published results are easily obtained online. "Ballistic motion of dust in the Lunar Roving Vehicle dust trails", Hsu, Hsiang-Wen, Horányi, Mihály, (University of Colorado), American Journal of Physics, Volume 80, Issue 5, pp. 452-456 (2012). They conclude that the lack of particles’ deceleration along the x-axis of their coordinate system, could only be the case if Apollo 16’s rover footage was filmed in a vacuum and in an environment where g = 1,6 m/s2. Enjoy reading, take care.
Ha - another hoaxer bites the dust. The rover dust is incredibly hard to fake in a movie because such fine dust (hoaxers claim they used cement dust) would hang around in the air for minutes - not fall back to the ground quickly like it does on the moon videos. I get clouds of cement dust every time I empty a cement bag, and it hangs around for a good minute and floats next door to annoy the neighbours. Dust is a very strong evidence of real moon landings, especially decades before anyone had that sort of computer graphics. Man, they didn't even have engineering CAD!
The Mythbusters series was created to keep everyone asleep....'Nothing to see here folks' type of thing..
Nope :-)
@Abercrombie Shelmerdine Oh hush now sweet child, go back to sleep
Member when they tried hydrogen and claimed it would never work ?
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?.
I just read an article about how they are have been working for years on the scaphandrier to be able to walk safely on the moon... so what about the ones of 1969? My old jacket of 1980 still protects me from the rain... Does that mean they lost the "technology" that was used then... Will be reassured when they again all walk on the moon;
Are you talking about the suit? The one they had for Apollo could only last a few hours at a time safely on the moon. The new missions are designed to last weeks. They didn't lose the tech. They're just making something better.
LOL! He did not want to bump his head. x= xo + vo(t) + 1/2(a)(t)(t). Take the square root of 6. and slow down, or speed up, depending on how you do it, and that is the slow motion to pretend being on the mooooon.....
Where is the video showing the inside of them LEM with the astronauts in
the moon suits and attached with the bungee cords. They had a periscope in the CSM and LEM for navigation, but for some reason there are no pictures or videosof stars. The second moment changes as the fuel and oxidizer gets used, but somehow these 4 groups of steering motors kept the LEM from crashing. No remote control or autopilot test landing to verify the LEMs control system and steering motors, with the sloshing fuel and oxidizer and water, but somehow they got it right the first time. The LEM simulator Neil flew and crashed obviously did not have the same second moment as the fake studio LEM on the moon stage. No radars on the moon to verify CSM orbit and LEM ignition. For the moon suit sublimator what blackbody absorber temperature did they use for outer space and the maximum power flux from the sun from the ultraviolet to infrared wavelengths. Same with the engine jet landing on the moon and the missing dust cloud and nobody afraid of rocks piercing the LEM or damage to the antennas, steering motors, or landing radar. They could have pointed the cameras up away from the moon instead of golfing on the moon stage but they decided not to because they would have taken pictures of the stage guys on the catwalk They also drove the moon buggy with lots of dust in the vacuum of the moon studio. Where is the video showing the astronauts in the LEM on the studio mooooon putting on their backpack life support. The clown did a fake spacewalk in the non gravity simulator in the airplane,but for some reason no stars in pictures or video from that. Their studio moon suits were contaminated with moon dust, which likely is radioactive, but no problem
to put a Geiger counter next to their suits to verify there was no radiation hazard.Neil jumped off the studio LEM, but since it was live they could not slow down the speed by the square root of six, like the Six Million Dollar Man slow motion, because that would put the rest of their studio acting out of sync..Astronauts could not get more than 6 inches off the moon as they were hopping and walking and pretending to be on the moon stage. Radiation heat transfer on the LEM so they used a glycol cooling loop to radiate that heat back out into the air conditioned studio. Total hoax.
Sue - You said "LOL! He did not want to bump his head. x= xo + vo(t) + 1/2(a)(t)(t). Take the square root of 6. and slow down, or speed up, depending on how you do it, and that is the slow motion to pretend being on the mooooon....."
Likewise my ignorant friend, that means to restore Apollo footage back to 'normal', then it must be sped up by 2.46 times to ensure the moon dust falls at the rate of the moon's gravity, and yet when we do that the astronaut's movements are clearly WRONG, they are so fast, like those old black and white Keystone Cops movies.
For example:
ruclips.net/video/axEFTsXlsfA/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/CTgRnnHu590/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/806QKgk2ANg/видео.html
Therefore by your OWN argument you proved the footage can not be slow motion. So thanks for that :-)
Yazzam X: High guys! Do you remember the Six Million Dollar Man? Re-memeber the slow motion action scenes. Those were awesome, huh? Speed it up by the square root of 6 or play t back by the square root of 6. Do you know the difference between speed and acceleration and simple equations of straight line motion with constant acceleration. Remember Fdt=Mdv. You can do a Dirac Delta impulse thing if you want.
What is your 4 year degree in? Have you ever been an observer at a criminal trial. You must be less naive and scrutinize the evidence better.
Have you ever seen Fireball XL5? Farewell old friend.
@@suekennedy8917 - In other words, you couldn't counter the points I made proving the Apollo footage could not be slow motion. So thanks for effectively admitting that :-)
And it's amusing you should be asking about degrees and trials when we had that discussion before, but then again, that tends to happen when you just mindlessly copy and paste from a collection of replies :-)
@@yazzamx6380 Save your breath, man. These people are NOT gonna be confused by the facts, no matter what you say or what you show them.
@@olstumpy3567 - Thanks my friend. I mostly post such information for others to read, since it's a waste of time trying to change the minds of those whose minds are made up already. But for those who are on the fence and/or are interested in the facts - they're the ones who I hope will get something out of my replies :-)
@TheVMFA333 Can you prove that? Evidence? Links? Proof? Your opinion is moot.
Asiablue are you alive?
It is amazing how similar is that airplane and ISS!!
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?
History has many moving parts. My background is Portuguese and iam proud and love our Maritime heritage. It took us over a hundred years just to figure out how to get around Cape Bojador with many a shipwreck let alone the other shipwrecks from ancient Mariners. The point being your telling me the Apollo moon missions were a perfect 6 for 6 landing and take-off? Going to a place that's 250000 miles away with tangibles and intangibles never experienced in human history (that we know of)? We did go to the moon (crafts,probes, technology whatever you want to call them) but no MAN has ever walked on the moon and maybe never will, just like fish can't live without the ocean we can't live without the Earth and there is nothing wrong with that. There is a reason why the Earth has many protective layers ( ionasphere for example) to protect all the living organisms living and the biggest organism and there is also a reason we can't see these layers because unfortunately for us humans many things in this existence is beyond us.
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?
_The point being your telling me the Apollo moon missions were a perfect 6 for 6 landing and take-off?_
No they weren't.
_Going to a place that's 250000 miles away with tangibles and intangibles never experienced in human history (that we know of)?_
Your personal incredulity is not evidence.
@@Jan_Strzelecki my personal beliefs made you respond to my comment. Did it make you feel better? Did it strengthen your beliefs? I haven't been to the moon and something tells me you haven't either. Send me a postcard when you get there.
@@robertmartins1712 _my personal beliefs made you respond to my comment._
Yes. Your personal beliefs.
_Did it make you feel better?_
Not particularly.
_Did it strengthen your beliefs?_
Not particularly, either.
_I haven't been to the moon and something tells me you haven't either._
I haven't been to China either.
@@Jan_Strzelecki ah man don't forget the postcards I haven't been to China either. Btw do I have to do everything? This cut and paste shit boring. You should read wagging the moon doggie by David McGowan. Just fair warning though you can only read though if you are of Critical mind and objective thought and you got to have balls too.
They had planes too didn't they? If you can film yourselves experiencing 1/6th gravity, so could NASA had done it. This proves nothing.
Completely different. Planes achieve 1/6th gravity for about 20-30 seconds in a small confined space, whereas Apollo footage shows 1/6th gravity in uncut footage sometimes lasting over an hour in a huge environment.
So if anything, that proves it cannot be faked on Earth and therefore Apollo footage must have been filmed in an environment with 1/6th gravity, and hence must have been filmed on the moon.
@Yazzam X If the movie business taught us something is that creative people can cheat the hell out of your senses. While I do believe they actually went there, I'm unsure if you can ever prove humans were really there.
@@alexmipego - My friend, one thing the movie business has also taught us is that once they can do something then they can continue doing it! :-) To this day, not even the world's BEST special effects experts working on sci-fi movies with the biggest budgets have ever recreated the perfect 1/6th gravity seen in hour upon hour of Apollo footage (with scenes lasting over an hour uncut). Only today can they get close to it with CGI, but even CGI doesn't look quite right (we're not quite there yet with CGI).
Neither has the world's best illusionists ever recreated the perfect 1/6th gravity seen on stage (not even as a homage to Apollo).
I've always said that we only need to see ONE example of a film maker recreating perfect 1/6th gravity here on Earth to the quality seen in Apollo footage in scenes lasting more than several seconds (such as 30 seconds uncut) to prove it could have been faked back then.
Since no-one to date has been able to achieve perfect 1/6th gravity in a studio, then there's no reason to believe NASA could have achieved it way back in 1969 to 1972, and therefore from a film perspective alone that's enough to prove the footage was filmed in 1/6th gravity, and the only location known for the perfect 1/6th gravity seen is the moon :-)
@Yazzam X As I explained I do believe they went there.
However take a closer look at your explanation. If you are saying NASA actually put someone on the Moon, it stands to reason they are automatically able to film anything at 1/6 gravity because to achieve that they don't need to go as far as the moon. Assume for example the Van Allen belt was impassable by humans, they could send a large ship high enough to get 1/6 gravity but before the belt. It would need a lot less fuel to stay at that altitude for hours, and they could film it there.
All I'm saying is, you believe Hollywood is faking gravity, but you're basing that on images from NASA. IF those were fakes, there's a possibility that the Hollywood footage is more realistic than a faked NASA footage.
@@alexmipego - I know you said you believe they went, hence that's great I'm not questioning that. My point is that anyone claiming the footage could have been faked MUST prove it could have been faked, and to this day no-one has ever done that.
It is impossible to achieve 1/6th gravity in the way you suggested for two main reasons;
1) Earth gravity approaches 1/6th of it's strength at an altitude of 5800 miles, which is within the inner Van Allen belt (the most dangerous region of the belts).
2) Spacecraft have to be in orbit around the Earth, resulting in weightless conditions.
Another reason is that it's impossible to recreate an environment of the size seen in the Apollo footage inside a spacecraft. Some of the Apollo scenes has astronauts walking great distances away from the camera in the uncut footage, some even vanishing below the features of the landscape! So it can't be faked in Earth orbit.
And no, I'm saying Hollywood has NEVER successfully faked perfect 1/6th gravity, which is why there are ZERO Apollo hoax videos showing clips from movies that they claim to be proof that it could have been faked on Earth. Instead they resort to vague claims about wires (but can never say how many or where exactly they are attached) or slow motion, but can't explain why speeding the film up to make the dust match Earth's gravity causes the astronauts to move too fast.
The Apollo footage even has scientific papers analyzing the footage, such as analysis of the dust thrown up by the lunar rover wheels.
So the bottom line is - Until someone can present footage filmed here on Earth that matches the perfect 1/6th gravity seen in Apollo footage as I stated earlier, then claims that the footage was faked remains unfounded.
If we did go to the moon why Haven't we gone back
9 manned trips to the moon, 6 landed. 44 trips since then with unmanned vehicles. Why do they keep going back so much?
@@TexMex421 so the conspiracy theorist can shut up about the fake moon landing even though we did go to the moon.
@@antholog There can never be any proof for one in denial.
No pressing need. Been there, done that. Space exploration has been focusing on more distant objects like Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Pluto, asteroids, comets, etc., which are also less risky and less costly than sending humans to the moon.
Money.
The moon is made of cheese.
@TheVMFA333 LOL...ok, I prefer communicating with mature adults anyway. Something for which you are clearly not qualified.
Asiablue are you still alive
Asiablue i was 10 when you wrote this damn
@@_omaradnan yea rip
omar 3m4 RIP guy who thinks the moon landing was fake
@WhattsHisName Gulp gulp, Yum kool aid
Why don't you two clowns get in Apollo 11 and test it for real?
Sounds like a great idea! Who are the 2 clowns? How can they get into Apollo 11? Did you know the Apollo 1 LEM hatch was too small to go though in a spacesuit! 2' circle!
still far what a real deal would be if NASA and US gov intended to carry out the perfect staging of a moon landing
Is it? Why?
@TheVMFA333 Enjoy your ego.
3:10 Nice safety lines! Plus with their amaaaazing special effects skills, it's incredible they do not even as much as TOUCH the frontscreen projection lines!
That's the VHF antenna coming out of the backpack.
@@Ihaveanamenowtaken Then it would be visible at all times.
@@mortenhansen3455 It was a flat metal strip. It's more visible in one direction than other. Plus, it is always visible in high quality photos.
@@Ihaveanamenowtaken Explain the frontscreen projection line in every single shot of the moonlanding, etc...
@@mortenhansen3455 Film transfer. The end.
They had cables that reduced gravity to 1/6th so of course it's gonna be similar whether done in a plane or on the ground. This doesn't prove anything.
And were all the grains of dust suspended on cables too? :-)
In the Apollo footage, the astronauts could not move their feet without their boots kicking dust up and around, and yet the dust ALWAYS fell at the rate of the moon's gravity with zero air resistance.
Therefore the idea that 1/6th gravity was achieved using cables is debunked by the dust.
And if you want to claim they used slow motion, then to restore the falling moon dust to the rate of Earth's gravity, then the footage would need to be sped up by 2.46 times (the square root of 6). Not by 1.5 times, not by 2 times, but by 2.46 times to match Earth's gravity.
However, when Apollo footage is fed up by 2.46 times to make the dust match Earth's gravity, the movements of the astronauts are ridiculously fast, making them appear more like the Key Stone cops in those old black and white silent movies.
Therefore neither slow motion nor cables would work, that's why in all these decades since the moon landings, not even the world's best special effects experts with the highest budgets available to them have ever recreated perfect 1/6th gravity in a studio for sci-fi films or TV series.
lol the conspiracy is that these guys gets to try cool stuff in the name of science...
@@yazzamx6380 yup you're absolutely correct. Today its not possible to simulate gravity on a scientific level without parabolic flight. In 1969 they didn't have near the technology to do so even on a practical level.. Also at 2:48 you can see that Adam rotates with his whole body by the center of his mass, you can not do this if you are on ground level attached with strings, you're rotation would be directly affected by the string that you are attached to. And lastly being up suspended makes you a lot stiffer in your legs, meaning you wouldn't bend them as much, If you look at the apollo footage you can see the astronauts are bending their legs.
@@yazzamx6380 I see you got no hoaxers replying to your comment because you explained the physics perfectly. The last paragraph interferes with their world view and therefore must be ignored.
@@chrislaine8807 - Thanks my friend :-)
the clowns telling you the circus is not real
Mythbusters , how much did NASA pay you to cover up their LIES ? Jamie Hyneman , get rid of the moustache and goatee. You look like the gay biker with the leathers, in the movie Police Academy, dancing with Mahoney in the BLUE OYSTER BAR.
Baseless accusations doesn't prove them wrong my friend. This episode of MythBusters was first broadcast just over 10 YEARS ago, plenty of time for others to carry out the same experiments to prove them wrong, and yet that hasn't happened :-)
@@yazzamx6380 Don't allow PATRIOTISM to stand in your way of the TRUTH !
You believe these 2 STOOGES who was paid by NASA to cover up there LIES?
This is just one of thousands of evidence that NASA faked the Apollo Moon Landings..., ruclips.net/video/x1atbdcGWgs/видео.html
@@odysseuspsarros4695 - I'm not American... Anyway, here's a video that shows how the film maker Bart Sibrel caught you hook, line and sinker my friend :-) [2 links to the same video follows]
ruclips.net/video/RKkpfYUhkig/видео.html
www.dailymotion.com/video/x2zt9g6
The audio was recently broken in the original RUclips upload, therefore I included the dailymotion link too.
And look at the flag claim in your video at 0:13 ( ruclips.net/video/x1atbdcGWgs/видео.html ), claiming air currents probably from air conditioners were responsible for the flag waving.
Now LOOK at the FULL scene of the flag being deployed that the film maker Bart Sibrel didn't show you;
ruclips.net/video/kJiv23TX_kw/видео.html
As you watch that footage, don't focus on the flag but focus instead on the extremely fine dust kicked around by the astronaut's boots.
Do I *really* need to explain why the dust proves there are no air currents blowing through that scene, much less air currents strong enough to move the flag? Do I *really* need to explain when and why we see the flag moving and when and why we see the flag remaining still?
I'm not saying you should now change your mind nor am I saying that proving a hoax claim is wrong means men landed on the moon, all I'm saying is that *you shouldn't assume that hoax believers are angels who cannot be wrong, cannot make mistakes, cannot deceive and cannot deliberately lie.* Because to do so exposes you to being manipulated by the very same people you trust.
Fireball XL5 is more real than the fake moooon landings. None of them saw any stars except for that liar Jim Lovel from apolLO(L) 13.
@@suekennedy8917 - Another typically ignorant reply from you Sue:-)
The astronauts were clear when they could see stars and when they couldn't. For example, from Michael Collins 1974 book "Carrying The Fire" (you do know who Michael Collins is, right?);
[When in orbit around the earth]
Quote:
"...Out from behind the shadow of the earth, we are into the constant sunlight...Towards the sun, nothing can be seen but its blinding disk, whereas down-sun there is simply a black void. The stars are there, but they cannot be seen because, with sunlight flooding the spacecraft, the pupil of the eye involuntarily contracts, and the light from the stars is too dim to compete with the reflected sunlight, as both enter the eye through the tiny aperture formed by the contracted pupil. No, to see the stars, the pupil must be allowed to relax, to open wide enough to let the starlight form a visible image on the retina, and that can be done only by blocking out the sunlight...".
[When entering the shadow of the moon]
Quote:
"...To add to the dramatic effect, we find we can see the stars again. We are in the shadow of the moon now, in darkness for the first time in three days, and the elusive stars have reappeared as if called especially for this occasion...".
[With Neil and Buzz on the surface and whilst in the shadow of the moon]
Quote: "...Outside my window I can see stars - and that is all. Where I know the moon to be, there is simply a black void; the moon's presence is defined solely by the absence of stars".
That is consistent with everything we've heard from Neil and Buzz and other astronauts since then.
Next?
Lol..
You need a big racket to lefe earth they say.and to make them come back with no racket that all fall off they say going up.they thing we are on drugs.
Google Translate? :-)
They were paid to say that
Nope. Next? :-)
🤣🤣🤣
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?.
This guys Lucky in nasa side, otherwise they've gone.....
Why does it matter? We have more important things to do in life.
Believe me it wasn’t faked. It makes no sense. It would have been easier to just do it.
Just because your "moon walk" experience in the "vomit commit" was similar, or just the same, as the actual moon walk does not necessarily mean that the "actornauts" actually walked on the moon. This simply proves that the moon walk very well could have been staged through the use of wire harnesses suspending the actors on a television set. Recording them in a similar fashion with the gravitational forces experienced on the vomit commit would not have been difficult with the intentional deception of them being on the surface of the moon. Come on Mythbusters, I had more confidence in your abilities to get at the real truth!
You said "This simply proves that the moon walk very well could have been staged through the use of wire harnesses suspending the actors on a television set."
No it doesn't my friend :-)
Watch this footage of the Apollo 17 flag being deployed, where conspiracy theorists like to cherry pick clips from this footage to claim the flag is blowing in the wind, for which the incredibly fine dust on the surface proves there's no wind blowing.
ruclips.net/video/kJiv23TX_kw/видео.html
The kicked up dust particles falls back down with zero air resistance in the 1/6 gravity of the moon, which is something we see in hour after hour of Apollo surface footage, i.e. the lunar dust falling at the rate of the moon's gravity no matter how high it is thrown up!
So was each grain of dust suspended on a wire harness too? :-)
They did all that too. This is a five-minute clip from an hour-long programme - that's how RUclips works, FYI. Maybe go watch the rest of it?
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?.
Yeah, they went through all that raditation in a contraption that had walls made out of tin foil. So thin, that one of the apollo astronauts said you could of poked your finger through it. Yet we are to believe they went through the van allen belts in that bullshit? Going at speeds faster than our planes on earth. Lol.
They were NOT inside the Lunar Module when traveling through the belts.
They were inside the conically shaped Command Module, the craft with the THICK hull that lands in the sea upon return.
Hence please look at this 4 minute animation of the moon landing to see how it all worked;
ruclips.net/video/8VvfTY-tVzI/видео.html
Also, why do you believe NASA when they say there are invisible belts of radiation around the Earth, but you don't believe the SAME NASA when they say the SAME invisible belts of radiation are not a problem to pass through in just a few hours? :-)
Btw, the LM was not a fragile craft as claimed, it was a very solid and sturdy craft.
@@yazzamx6380 im sorry. I apreciate your words. But nothing you said changed what i believe. What i said was just a fraction of why this moon landing is bs. And you can claim all you want the moon lander was sturdy and put together well lol. Its a joke to think that in the 60s we went but cant go no more because we "destroyed the technology" gtfoh
@@shayawnyahyapour1998 - I'm not trying to change your mind, I'm simply pointing out your numerous errors due to you blindly believing conspiracy theorists :-)
NASA got men to the moon in the 60s with a blank cheque from Congress to build and launch the largest and the most powerful rocket in history, the Saturn V.
After the Saturn V was retired, name the rocket capable of accelerating a manned craft to 25,000 mph to break Earth's gravity to send it to the moon.
Misquoting the "destroyed technology" nonsense doesn't make your case. Late this year (or in 2020) we'll see the launch of NASA's massive SLS rocket which will take the Orion space capsule around the moon and back to Earth.
In 2023, the SLS is scheduled to AGAIN take Orion around the moon, but this time with a crew of astronauts on a mission lasting 8 to 21 days.
That's called rebuilding the technology using modern materials and techniques :-)
@@yazzamx6380 nothing you said was fact. So you said nothing
@@shayawnyahyapour1998 - Denial is for kids son :-)
Aha now we really know how they did it. The walk & leap on the moon is different from the walk and leap of the mythbusters while on the plane. The walk and leap on theplane is more fluid while the walk & leap on the moon seems bumpy and more like to be hanging on wires? The difference is overwhelming. Do it again guys. Maybe the next time, you'll be able to copy the walk on the moon.
It is bumpy because the moon's surface is not exactly as plain as the plane's.
Astronaut and NASA spokesman DON PETTIT said NASA no longer has the technology to get back to the moon. He said it would take a really LONG time to get the technology back.NASA scientists and administrators also said they lost ALL the Apollo telemity reels. They also said they lost the following: !!!ALLL!!! of the Apollo patents, designs, every piece of tools and equiptment and hardware in existence!! Eccept for the mock ups in museums, NOTHING exists to prove Apollo ever existed.THEY EVEN LOST THE SPARE SATURN 5 ROCKETS MEANT FOR CANCELLED MISSIONS!!! How do you lose a 30 story building made of alluminum?There's only one reason to lose all of that stuff. If nobody went to the Moon. they may have had the rocket, but did it really go anywhere? When you pull off the greatest fraud in the history of mankind you don't exactly want evidence laying around do you?.
@gordon1201 enjoy your Kool-Aid
and we supposed to believe you jus because you said so they didn't go and that's the truth period.!!!!
How much did they pay you "mythbusters"?
Ah yes, the classic "paid" accusation parroted by believers of practically EVERY conspiracy theory out there :-D
The satisfaction of proving idiots wrong, that what they where paid
They were flat out making an Atari game back then .... FAIL
???
How can you ' bust a myth' without actually doing it, in other words they never went to the moon to confirm or disprove the moon landing so how can they confirm the moon landing if they never went to the moon.
So you need to personally go to the North Pole to prove people have been to the North Pole?
NASA knew they would’ve been caught in the future if they faked it so they didn’t besides if that was the case someone would’ve leaked it by now. We’re going to the moon in 4 years on the Artemis mission and they’ll show the site where Neil and Buzz once step on unless you want to claim that the astronauts going there put those “props” there
You think they had the budget to go to the moon??? You think they could just ask NASA to let them on the moon for a TV show? They work with what they’ve got, they always have. They’ve done myths involving getting shot, are you going to demand they ACTUALLY shoot someone to prove or disprove it?
The theory is 1/3 speed AND wires. You can't make up and debunk your own theory. FAIL.
Magic Rooster. You'll need some medieval magic to fake the 1/6 gravity in a vacuum accurately.LOL If you can match the predictable and calculable Newtonian physics of the astronauts and inanimate objects' movements on the lunar surface,I'll write you a check for $100,000 dollars.Impossible.Period.Let me know when you are ready to call NASA out. Here duplicate this RUclips clip .Apollo 15 in 60fps: Rover Traverse To Station 4 ruclips.net/video/boFZ3cAws20/видео.html
Come on guys. Stop playing political games for NASA.
Except this episode was broadcast 11 YEARS ago, more than enough time for others to carry out the same experiments to prove MythBusters wrong :-)
Bullshit.
The irony of them using fakery, in attempt to disprove fakery🤣
The irony of them using fakery, in attempt to disprove fakery🤣
The irony of them using fakery, in attempt to disprove fakery🤣