Rolex 6238 Chronograph Pre-Daytona Vintage Rolex Watch Review

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 3 фев 2025

Комментарии • 41

  • @risshenraj1055
    @risshenraj1055 3 года назад +12

    Wow
    It’s so amazing to see a Rolex design that you so rarely see

  • @thewatchtherapist5066
    @thewatchtherapist5066 3 года назад +4

    This might be the best piece you've ever showcased on this channel, Tim

  • @PINKFL0YD-s2h
    @PINKFL0YD-s2h Год назад +1

    It's better looking than the current one in My opinion..

  • @enterusername7746
    @enterusername7746 3 года назад +7

    The size of this watch is just awesome. I wish todays watches would be more in this realm instead of becoming bigger and bigger.

    • @stewester
      @stewester 3 года назад +3

      Agreed. The average person hasn't got that much bigger surely? The size of many watches these days is ridiculous.

  • @richardweir3342
    @richardweir3342 3 года назад +7

    Shame Rolex don't offer this model today

  • @Nefville
    @Nefville 3 года назад +3

    Thats in pretty good shape when you realize its 56ish years old. Nice one Tim and Co., more vintage please!

  • @Andromeda-cl3nm
    @Andromeda-cl3nm 3 года назад +2

    I have Never seen this Rolex before very interesting Video thanks.

  • @J-SH06
    @J-SH06 3 года назад +5

    This is the one George Lazenby bought to wear to the audition for Bond. Back of the net!👍🏻

    • @Theo-ul8qm
      @Theo-ul8qm 2 месяца назад

      Also wore it in the movie, not only at the audition.

  • @valeriodellacasa5360
    @valeriodellacasa5360 3 года назад +8

    only at watchbox! Tim you're awesome, always showing us these wonders and making us salivate infront of the screen

  • @mrb317
    @mrb317 3 года назад +13

    That one time when rolex copied Heuer ..

  • @jamesblonde2271
    @jamesblonde2271 3 года назад +5

    Shame the bracelets missing but nice restoration on the dial.

  • @eugeniozanda7230
    @eugeniozanda7230 2 года назад

    Very nice, it looks like a Datejust with the chronograph...

  • @mangello13
    @mangello13 Год назад

    Hi,
    I have the exact same Rolex chronometer 6238 from 1964 and in mint condition !..
    Alas, it hasn't worked for 2 days and I'm living to France and I really don't know someone efficient to see what's going on and fix it?... Also, please, would you have a good address to help ?..
    Thank' s a lot and all my best regards from Paris )France).

  • @cookedit
    @cookedit 3 года назад

    A timeless classic. A chrono good enough for any occasion. Shame on the slights scratches - but to be expected for a timepiece of it's age - and omission of the metal bracelet. Still a beauty.

  • @user-do8ef4np7q
    @user-do8ef4np7q 3 года назад +1

    Just wow Tim.

  • @alexisesguerra2544
    @alexisesguerra2544 3 года назад +3

    What a beauty!!!

  • @LiquidSm0ke
    @LiquidSm0ke 3 года назад +3

    36 grand if anyone was wondering !

    • @thewatchtherapist5066
      @thewatchtherapist5066 3 года назад +2

      Not bad actually considering what modern day daytonas go for in the secondary market

    • @LiquidSm0ke
      @LiquidSm0ke 3 года назад +1

      @@thewatchtherapist5066 true

  • @Jackkyloi2110
    @Jackkyloi2110 3 года назад +2

    Look amazing

  • @jamespalsson746
    @jamespalsson746 3 года назад

    What did this sell for?

  • @sweetlemonade123
    @sweetlemonade123 2 года назад

    This watch is my absolute grail. I'd sell my soul for one in perfect condition.

    • @fallingwatersnz
      @fallingwatersnz 2 года назад

      Me too, except the black dial version for me..

  • @MohammedKhaled-ju7gy
    @MohammedKhaled-ju7gy 3 года назад +1

    Six figure chrono I reckon?

  • @styx4947
    @styx4947 3 года назад

    Those "Pre Da

  • @MrSoymilk2
    @MrSoymilk2 3 года назад

    You can get a Seagull 1963 for $200 which is basically this watch sans the Rolex logo....

  • @Neven2605
    @Neven2605 3 года назад

    Lol 35k$ for that trash 🤣

    • @m.e5544
      @m.e5544 3 года назад +4

      Curious to know the reasoning behind your comment. I'm sure there is none but please go ahead. Enlighten us

    • @Neven2605
      @Neven2605 3 года назад

      @@m.e5544 just because its a Rolex doesnt mean its worth the price, you can buy far more better watches for that price, vintage or new

    • @m.e5544
      @m.e5544 3 года назад +2

      @@Neven2605 You're right on that point. How do you judge what is a high price and what is not though? It's not only about the brand name. 35k is a lot of money sure but if there are people willing to pay the price...

    • @thewatchtherapist5066
      @thewatchtherapist5066 3 года назад

      @@m.e5544 he's just trolling, don't encourage him

    • @blairdrummond5043
      @blairdrummond5043 2 года назад

      @@Neven2605 a $10 casio is a better watch than any Rolex in terms of accuracy, durability, and functionality. Nobody pays thousands of dollars for a rolex because it makes sense logistically.

  • @salahaltrky8994
    @salahaltrky8994 3 года назад

    Isnot good style

    • @summerrr1
      @summerrr1 3 года назад +8

      Is not good opinion or grammar.