Scrooge, or Marley's Ghost (1901) | BFI National Archive

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 дек 2024

Комментарии • 88

  • @PooKneader
    @PooKneader 13 лет назад +59

    Pretty amazing when you consider this came out less than 60 years after the original book came out.

  • @56bluegold
    @56bluegold 13 лет назад +39

    It is wild, to see people moving around on film, who lived over a hundred years ago !

    • @Capcoor
      @Capcoor 3 года назад +3

      Isn’t it though?

  • @nikoknightpuppetproduction369
    @nikoknightpuppetproduction369 5 лет назад +13

    I am amazed that RUclips was around back in 1901. That is almost 100 years ago.

    • @dublinius
      @dublinius 5 лет назад +6

      Yeah, and no monetisation ads in those days before Google took it over.

    • @nikoknightpuppetproduction369
      @nikoknightpuppetproduction369 5 лет назад +4

      It must of been amazing. Internet must of been a lot cheaper too. Maybe just a penny a day.

    • @shutup9505
      @shutup9505 4 года назад

      @e M r/woosh

  • @alejoparedes2388
    @alejoparedes2388 3 года назад +13

    The first film adaptation of Charles Dickens' classic, and still one of the very best. It's such a tragedy that the complete film hasn't survived.

  • @JoeLibby
    @JoeLibby 11 лет назад +27

    Thank you for posting this. I'm amazed by how sharp the film looks!

  • @beacee
    @beacee 5 лет назад +6

    I didn't even know they had films as early as 1901. Simply amazing!

    • @prairiepennyproductions
      @prairiepennyproductions 2 года назад +4

      In case you didn't know (or anybody reading this that doesn't), the earliest surviving film (at least that I'm aware of) is The Roundhay Garden Scene. It's about 2 or 3 seconds long and was filmed in 1888. :)

  • @JohnDoe-zh4li
    @JohnDoe-zh4li 7 лет назад +16

    I believe .5 speed is the closest we'll ever get to its correct playback speed, as the film was hand-cranked and it nearly every frame could've been cranked at a different rate.

  • @woofer32
    @woofer32 14 лет назад +7

    Marvelous, I can't get over how good the quality is for the age.

  • @namsivad
    @namsivad 15 лет назад +8

    Wow, this is phenomenal! Till this day, the film still looks new, and it just needs a new musical number to be added to it!

  • @WORLD8NSH5KNIGHT1
    @WORLD8NSH5KNIGHT1 14 лет назад +8

    Its incredible that they can encompasse the whole story practically in just over 3 minutes. Given that this is 109 years old, in the very early days of filming, it was a pretty good attempt.

  • @Tarkus_H
    @Tarkus_H 11 месяцев назад +1

    Crazy to think that some of these actors were alive at the same time Charles Dickens was.

  • @leedshunk
    @leedshunk 13 лет назад +10

    that was really interesting , but i'm amazed to see the term 'xmas' used so early on , i've always thought it much later !!!!!!

    • @edmerc92
      @edmerc92 3 года назад +5

      The X is actually the Greek letter Chi, short for "Christ".

    • @leedshunk
      @leedshunk 3 года назад

      I see , I have learnt something new , but every day is a school day !

    • @mikela1341
      @mikela1341 3 года назад +2

      Wow, so that's why we say Xmas. That's pretty cool.

  • @WORLD8NSH5KNIGHT1
    @WORLD8NSH5KNIGHT1 14 лет назад +2

    My house was built the same year this film was made. Incredible.

  • @PapagenoJuan2
    @PapagenoJuan2 14 лет назад +5

    this is really amazin!! :))) Even for such a movie made in 1901, look at the special effects they did. Even marley's ghost looks real

  • @obrienqwerty
    @obrienqwerty 3 года назад +3

    Absolutely astonishing for the time. I think Dickens, as a lover of the special effect, would have approved.

  • @talfacprez
    @talfacprez 15 лет назад +3

    I LOVE IT! I think it was great timing to post this on RUclips today. I think this is the week Disney will be releasing Dickens Christmas Carol in 3d this weekend. From the earliest version to the very latest in a sweep.

  • @Loganberrybunny
    @Loganberrybunny 5 лет назад +1

    Just 58 years between the original book and this. There may well have been a few people who bought the book new as youngsters who were still around to see this film. And surely quite a few who saw Dickens' readings, which went on for many years, who saw the film too.

  • @HargroveFilms1
    @HargroveFilms1 13 лет назад +2

    This was very good. Great clean print for 1901.

  • @jaredofmo
    @jaredofmo 15 лет назад +3

    A lot of silent films are shown at the wrong frame rate. I attempted to correct one once, and it almost doubled in length.

  • @yaknbo
    @yaknbo 15 лет назад +1

    This is so cool. These maniacs rushing around in a medium that was daily new. So cool. Thank you very much for posting.

  • @tmrezzek5728
    @tmrezzek5728 6 лет назад +2

    Only a fragment, but awesome stuff. This film exhibits a couple of vertical wipes and dissolves which gives further proof that cinema shorthand was pretty much all invented by the time DW Griffith came along.

  • @sabrinanascimento5248
    @sabrinanascimento5248 4 года назад +1

    I am amazed at how sharp the film is and how old it is.

  • @twas4kids
    @twas4kids 2 года назад

    Such performances !

  • @CallicoJackracham
    @CallicoJackracham 12 лет назад +1

    @56bluegold indeed and considering the time the movie was made the ghost effect used when marley enters and walks around the room is incredible!

  • @idontgetno
    @idontgetno 12 лет назад

    what wonderful clarity of print

  • @rhomo
    @rhomo 15 лет назад +1

    absolutely AMAZING!!!!

  • @mrtusd1
    @mrtusd1 11 лет назад +1

    it's a wonderful film. It's a pity that not all preserved

  • @adcashmo
    @adcashmo 15 лет назад +1

    Yeah, and some that were on tape will have been recorded over because tape was expensive.
    I remember reading about how all the original Dad's Army episodes were lost that way.

  • @AntajuanGrady
    @AntajuanGrady 3 года назад

    I was born 1991 so it's interesting to see footage from 90 years before that!

  • @ANDROLOMA
    @ANDROLOMA 15 лет назад +2

    Looks as if Scrooge was being lambasted by the ghost of Christmas Pest, hahaha!

  • @senatorsparky
    @senatorsparky 6 лет назад +2

    This is amazing and also hilarious when accompanied by Yakity Sax.

  • @customcartoons
    @customcartoons 14 лет назад +2

    thank you for this big juicy slice of history! yum! ^_^

  • @gregorkrause
    @gregorkrause 5 лет назад +3

    0:35 cool title sequence with action of a flying #marleysghost.

  • @amezzeray2
    @amezzeray2 15 лет назад

    wow!! thanks so much!!

  • @mryoshifreak
    @mryoshifreak 15 лет назад +2

    damn this is old. but classic

  • @80stimeagain
    @80stimeagain 15 лет назад +1

    Neat. Thanks for share. ;)

  • @APerson4889-g5f
    @APerson4889-g5f 3 месяца назад

    Made just 31 years after Dickens himself died in 1870 (aged only 58).

  • @jjobie
    @jjobie 15 лет назад

    You might want to go to BFI's website and read up on this fragment of film.

  • @WORLD8NSH5KNIGHT1
    @WORLD8NSH5KNIGHT1 4 года назад +1

    The same year Queen Victoria died! ..... and my house was built

  • @gauravzerogravity
    @gauravzerogravity 14 лет назад +2

    omg this is so old story i recently SAW CRISTMAS CAROL starring jim carry

    • @d.leighannbatemon3192
      @d.leighannbatemon3192 4 года назад

      That is the worst version in my opinion. Jim Carrey totally made a mockery of this classic.

  • @supbrahmn
    @supbrahmn 11 лет назад +8

    @molly If you lived in 1901 you would think this is amazing. And besides people only really went to pictures to see people moving around on a screen.

  • @Josh_LS7
    @Josh_LS7 3 года назад

    If you want to see this in 60FPS then set the playback speed on 1.25x

  • @jjobie
    @jjobie 15 лет назад

    You are mistaken. This fragment has been posted on BFI's site and is available for downloading from their archive if you live in the U.K. Not every silent film in existence is in horrible condition today - especially ones that weren't shown over and over and over again (which is likely the case with this print, since the film itself doesn't strike me as very interesting and may not have made much of a stir back then either).

  • @PriceRight89
    @PriceRight89 7 лет назад +6

    1901 moviegoers likely would have screamed when they saw Marley popping up at 0:44

  • @NightfallShadow
    @NightfallShadow Год назад

    I am going to steal this video off youtube, and throw a wax cylinder 1900s christmas song on it.

  • @ovechkin100
    @ovechkin100 15 лет назад +1

    thank god!

  • @edmerc92
    @edmerc92 3 года назад

    Why is this incomplete? Was the rest damaged?

  • @leemertolee
    @leemertolee 10 лет назад

    Can you post the 1914 Christmas Carol starring Charles Rock please?

  • @adcashmo
    @adcashmo 15 лет назад

    I've always wondered why people used to move so quickly in the olden days.

    • @lvelez1999
      @lvelez1999 5 лет назад

      It was the tape and video that played back fast.

  • @edstewart445
    @edstewart445 4 года назад

    wow could this be the earliest version with sir Seymour hicks that would be 34yrs earlier from 1935version

    • @MiningForPies
      @MiningForPies 4 года назад +1

      There were earlier versions, but this is the oldest surviving one I believe.

  • @george-km1pm
    @george-km1pm 4 года назад

    extremely swag

  • @gauravzerogravity
    @gauravzerogravity 14 лет назад

    @bigrigdriver99 40 VERSION REALLY GOOD THANX FOR THE KNOWLEDGE

  • @christmas10023
    @christmas10023 2 года назад

    Why would the actor break the fourth wall while at the door? 🤔

  • @86compgeek
    @86compgeek 11 месяцев назад

    I wonder if any of these actors are still alive?

  • @sherryhannah498
    @sherryhannah498 12 лет назад

    this was cool but didn't follow the book in the book Marley's Ghost didn't show Scrooge everything there was the Ghosts of Christmas Past Present and Yet to Come..well at least it showed Marley's face in the door knocker that scene was scary..if that was me I'd have screamed and passed out wouldn't y'all???... wonder how they did it????...that film is in great shape for being 112 years old don't y'all think?????

  • @elbandito7504
    @elbandito7504 5 лет назад

    Not the complete film....

  • @butchyboxer
    @butchyboxer 15 лет назад

    its not fake it is real how about actually knowing something before you type it

  • @JoeMarranca
    @JoeMarranca 13 лет назад

    michael bay...eat ur heart out

  • @The3Stooges
    @The3Stooges 3 года назад

    SPEAK UP!

  • @jjobie
    @jjobie 15 лет назад

    Well, no, actually it's not.

  • @seymakomur3990
    @seymakomur3990 4 года назад

    Çok başarılı

  • @customcartoons
    @customcartoons 14 лет назад

    @alanwright17 not to mention "His Majesty the Scarecrow of Oz" (1914). Plays like a bad home movie...

  • @butchyboxer
    @butchyboxer 15 лет назад

    it is real just get over that your wrong

  • @СабадашАлександрНиколаевич

    СКРУДЖ,ИЛИ ПРИЗРАК МАРЛИ(1901).

  • @morphybum
    @morphybum 15 лет назад

    Why don't you click on "more info" and educate yourself a little?

  • @Kamphoria
    @Kamphoria 5 лет назад

    So weird....

  • @garetmckenna8674
    @garetmckenna8674 9 лет назад

    Good video, but, on another video, there were about three minutes of extra scenes. To see my review of this film, go to my RUclips channel.

  • @Desslar
    @Desslar 4 года назад

    Definitely no fat in that script.

  • @KaBoomChannel
    @KaBoomChannel 14 лет назад

    Lame, but at least it`s better than a Kevin Smith film.

  • @cidvasconcelos6919
    @cidvasconcelos6919 2 года назад

    Resenha sobre o filme: magiadoreal.blogspot.com/2022/06/filme-do-dia-scrooge-or-marleys-ghost.html