And OJ will still be looking for the “real” killers. It would be interesting to see the evidence checked again with modern techniques. I’m surprised the “dream team” hasn’t done this to prove he’s innocent and to find those real killers that remain out there.
@@at6686 hay butt cheeks! 1st off your Narcissism is showing within your choice of verbiage! 2ndly You also have another "ISM" clearly sticking it's evil little head out! Thee other "ISM" is that of RACE!!! As a courtesy I shall not speak out that word completely within my text! The Dream Team you speak of ACTually has already done those things you mention within your suggestions that they should try in order to prove Orenthal's Innocence with today's tech! Guess What A T? Sir Mr. Orenthal James Simpson a.k.a. O. J. Is Innocent Now! InFacto O.J. Has Been Innocent even before he was arrested!
Tim Gaynor The officer did get justice. Abu Jamal is in prison for the rest of his life. Emmett tTill A teenage child brutalized and murdered off of a proven lie that he “whistled” at a white woman. And Another teenage child, Latasha Harlins, who simply was buying orange juice before school was murdered by an Asian store clerk. The Asian store clerk was fined $500 and sentenced to five years of probation and 400 hours of community service but no prison time for her crime. Where is the justice in that? Please don’t get me started on the 16th street baptist church bombing which hurt 22 human beings killing four little girls. Innocent children going to church. Any convictions? There has been thousands of injustices in this country. But the children; The children it’s shameful, fueled thru unnecessary Hatred. Hatred turned what should be the greatest most opportunistic country a pure joke.
eric Mays and Sandra bland, Trayvon , kj that boy they lied and said suffocated in a gym mat and they stole his organs, oh and all them people killed in rosewood cause they lady lied about being raped by black man.
Spazarella Poet Kendrick Johnson’s organs weren’t viable for transplants. The funeral home, that offered to pay for his funeral, cut corners instead of doing the right thing and embalming his organs that had come, after autopsy, in a bag. They instead threw them out and stuffed his body with newspapers. Is it right? Absolutely not. But, that is what happened. After days of being upside down in a Matt, I can assure you, KJ’s organs would have been well into decomposition. How he got into the matt, I still don’t honestly know. I have my feelings....but, those aren’t proof of foul play.
The LAPD losing the most obvious case ever, and embarrassing everyone in that judicial system is a sick form of karma at the expense of two innocent souls for all the bad shit they did during those times
they were not innocent!! OJ had an alibi he was asleep waiting to take this trip to chicago.. Nicole was a heavy drug user where OJ was going to take away the kids from her and ron was a DEA SNITCH!!
They weren't all that great. Barry Scheck was great and he demolished all the forensics. Cochran was great at giving the media quotables. B/c the truth of the matter is that the media was totally pro prosecution. OJ's defense would have a GREAT day and the media would tell everyone how bad it was. You can google some of it. The day that Bailey got Fuhrman to perjur himself....the media said it was a great day and Fuhrman looked really composed. In the end, the case wasn't even that close. The jury which included white people and a Spanish guy came back after a few hours with a not guilty verdict. This case is just more proof that fake news isn't new.
ER GLL by lying? It doesn’t take a dream team to take the evidence and suggest tampering. It certainly doesn’t take a dream team to impeach someone. It doesn’t take a dream team to ask ANYONE if they’ve ever used the N word and win that argument, which had nothing to do with the case. It just took a ridiculous judge who enjoyed the limelight way too much. It takes an attorney like in the civil suit, who can depose Simpson, to win......because OJ is OJ’s worst evidence.
@@philipwilliams1754i agree. Dr. Lee was and is considered of the best forensic scientists in the world i think and he supported some of the defense's theory on the evidence.
No he needed Cochran. Cochran was the one who could manipulate the African American community because he knew how to play on their emotions. That first, and then Scheck to vomit the "cesspool of contamination" theory. Cochran had to first turn the savages against the victims, and then Scheck had to turn the savages against law enforcement. OJ needed both of them.
@@randyharris3175 Exactly, they tried digging up dirt on the white jurors to remove them for stupid reasons, while the prosecution were trying to remove the black jurors who had deliberately been dishonest on the questionnaire. They made the mistake of not holding the trial in Santa Monica, the nearest to where the murders happened. Vincent Bugliosi pointed out the mistake that Garcetti made in his 7h analysis video of the case, he and Garcetti had actually talked about it and Garcetti admitted he made a mistake.
There were three videos in this collection that used to be on RUclips. There's this one, which describes the defence case. Then there was another one, describing the prosecution case. Do you have that one ? I think there might have been a third too. It would be excellent to get the other videos in this series. If the uploader has them, or could tell me where to get them, that'd be awesome and highly appreciated. Thanks allot.
There were at least 5 reasonable doubts in that case. 1. Vannatter taking OJ's vile of blood to both the crime scene and to OJ's home. 2. Trying the gloves on in front of the jury that obviously showed that it did not fit. 3. Furhman being exposed as a racist. 4.EDTA preservative found on OJ's socks. This suggested that the blood was more than likely planted on his socks. 5. Overall contamination of the crime scene, i.e. LAPD and the criminologists at the crime scene. This is why and how the not guilty verdict came about.. Now, don't blame the jurors. Blame the prosecution and the LAPD. Per the law, in any criminal trial where there is at least one reasonable doubt presented in that case, the jury has to acquit. Don't believe me? Research what the law says about reasonable doubt in a criminal case. I'm going to school for this so yes, I know what I'm talking about. Putting aside the fact that OJ Simpson more than likely murdered two people, the fault lies with the LAPD and the prosecution for letting a murderer walk due to their own lack of competence. Calling the jurors stupid for abiding by the law makes me thankful that most people in this country are not called to serve on any jury.
I agree Peace. Even though I believe OJ was guilty, there was plenty of reasonable doubt in this case. Fortunately for OJ he had the resources to afford the types of lawyers that could exploit that doubt. If he was broke and went in with a Public Defender, he'd probably be dead by now (executed).
Are you aware that a small amount of EDTA is in our blood at any 1 time, as it is things like laundry liquid which gets into the fibres of our clothes and in turn into our blood stream etc... that EDTA argument was so disingenuine. The Defense new it. They argued so many points that knew not to be true. They played a dirty, dirty game and unfortunately for Ron and Nicole, won. If it had not been for the 1 detective (Furhman) who did find that second glove, and if it had been any other cop, the defense would never have been able to use the argument that it was quite possibly planted. There was absolutely no evidence of planting of any kind. Every other cop and detective who was on the scene at Bundy long before Furhman turned up sighted 1 glove and 1 glove only. How could Furhman have suddenly turned up and found the left handed glove unbeknownst to anyone else there, put it in a baggy, then his car then went all the way to Rockingham and dropped it outside Kato Kaelin's bungalow especially when at that time he didn't know for sure what OJ's alibi was, if anything he was given the impression that OJ had been in Chicago during the time of the murders, so the idea of a smart detective planting evidence and risking sacrificing his entire career all on guess work is completely absurd. The defense knew how incriminating that glove was along with the blood evidence so they had to somehow try to cast the seed of doubt in the jurors minds however they could. It was disgusting. As I've mentioned under other videos about this case, I am from Australia originally, and I know for a fact that many people all around the world, outside of the US could look at this case very differently. We could see exactly what game the Defense was playing, the way they took an incredibly sensitive topic like civil rights and racism within the LAPD and use as leveridge for their client who had never wanted anything to do with the black community up until that point. Had no black pride, and going so far as to completely sever himself from being identified as a black man altogether. Disgusting! The Scheme Team, as his Defense is also known.
Can anyone explain to me why the blood on the sock had soaked through? The bloody socks are a HUGE mystery if anyone approaches them honestly. The socks were examined like 2/3 times and nobody saw the quarter sized blood stain...it's was oddly found like a month later. More on the blood soaking through....it was proven that the blood on the sock would've dried in a couple minutes. Yet the blood had soaked through the sock. This means that there wasn't a foot in the sock when the blood got on it. Dr. Lee showed further proof that the blood had to be pressed onto the sock in order to get it to soak through to the other side. This presented a real challenge to the prosecutors and they had no explanation for why this blood stain was found a month later and apparently pressed through the sock. Heck, the sock wasn't even in the initial video that the police took. It showed up in pictures later that day but it was staged differently in different photos...why would the police move the evidence around the scene?
@@philipwilliams1754 You’re kidding. The fact that he got off with the mountain of evidence of his guilt combined with his behavior makes his case almost unprecedented. People have been convicted, with literally a drop of blood, since his trial. Dishonest, even by lawyer standards, combined with ignorant, unsophisticated jurors who had an agenda made OJs trial almost a one off. Never see it again. People also forget that the civil trial was a laugher. There was no question in anyone’s mind who killed those people.
@markmac oké I never knew...(that he won his trail and lost the Civil case) Back then I saw some footage and the chase (with the bronco) on CNN here in Europe, but it did nt find my interest 25 years ago... Still can t believe how he got away with the 1st trail.....
@@michaelkirkpatrick7483 Why would OJ kill someone when he had a plane to catch? Why would he confidently think that he could commit this act with a knife, hide the weapon, clean himself up, change his clothes, get home, place his luggage into his limo, and get to the airport on time to board the plane?
BTW: I think that O.J. did kill Ron & Nicole, but if I had been a juror at the trial, I would have had to vote "Not guilty" because the state didn't prove their case.
Ray Davison what more proof would you need? Blood at the crime scene. Hairs consistent with OJ’s in the hat. Gloves bought by Nicole at Bloomingdales. Bruno Magli shoes that were his size. Cut to his left hand, plus several other cuts and abrasions. Bronco fibres found on Ron’s shirt. That’s all without the socks, the glove found at Rockingham, and the blood on the gate....the three pieces of evidence the defence attacked as planted. You’re seriously saying that even without the “planted evidence” there wasn’t enough to prove he did this? Lol. Jeezus.
I think at least two jurors had the same opinion right after the verdicts. That he was guilty but there was too much reasonable doubt. Years later at least two more say similar. If u watched the day to day there was a lot of things it’s just hard not to wonder if oj was framed.
I'm not a conspiracy theory fan at all, but I must admit there's a lot of stuff about this case that just doesn't make sense. Like how did OJ have no bruising or any injuries from Ronald Goldman if he had in fact killed him? Or that there were 2 sets of footprints (proven by Henry Lee) at the crime scene. And there's a lot more to it than that, but when you look at all the information carefully, I have to conclude it's quite possible OJ didn't commit the murders. Or at the very least he didn't do it alone. The one thing I don't doubt is that OJ does know the truth about what really happened.
SOTYfan He had cuts and scratches on his left hand. He left a blood trail from Nicole’s body, down her walkway, out her back gate and into his vehicle. That trail picks back up at his house from his vehicle, up his driveway and into his house. All of those blood drops came back to OJ. The defense attorneys never denied it was his blood. Their claim was it was planted. Blood samples were photographed and collected at both scenes , before OJs sample was even taken. So, there goes the planting theory because, you can’t plant what you don’t have yet. The glove couldn’t have been planted, because every officer that responded to the murder scene witnessed one glove there. The footprints. There were not two sets of footprints, not in blood anyway. There were bloody footprints leading away from the bodies. The other prints Henry Lee found were prints in set concrete from when the walkway was put in. So, not prints from the crime itself. You have his blood at the murder scene. You have fibers from the carpet of his vehicle, on a knit cap,found by one of the bodies. You have a bloody glove found at his home with his and the victims blood mixed together on and in it. A glove that matches the one at the murder scene. A glove that has his ex wife’s hair all over it. You have his blood and the victims blood, inside his locked vehicle. Why is your ex-wife’s blood, and a complete strangers blood in your vehicle? Why does a sock in your bedroom, have yours and your ex wife’s blood on it? You have a cut on your hand, that he admitted he cut at his home,before going to Chicago. A cut that he coincidentally got the night his ex wife was murdered two miles away and was still bleeding nearly 12 hours after he got it. That’s just the blood evidence. There’s the Bronco chase. The failed polygraph The suicide letter No alibi for 9:40pm til 10:56 pm, again coincidentally when the murders occurred 2 miles away. All of that information points to one person.
@@bigdaddycool4242 Defense brought up numerous people who saw OJ at the airport who said that he didn't have any scratches on his hand. So you'd have to explain why OJ is dripping blood everywhere but didn't have open wounds. FWIW, let's not get into how ridiculous it was to act like the blood on the back gate wasn't planted. They found that blood a month later and the DNA was higher quality than any other sample they had outside of the reference samples. You're telling me that a blood stain can sit outside for a month through rain and sun and hold up better than DNA that had seriously deteriorated after a couple hours? In the end, we don't know if OJ did. We know that there was reasonable doubt. I'm far more confident that evidence was planted than I am that OJ did it.
SOTYfan there were not other shoe prints. Lee was wrong. It was found that the extra prints were, and still are, there. They were made by the builder who laid the concrete. He had accidentally stepped in the concrete. The other set match Ron’s boots. Only OJ’s Bruno Magli shoe prints are unaccounted for.....well, at the time of the case. It was obvious he owned them by the time the civil trial was heard. A lack of evidence, like the fact he only had several cuts and abrasions to his left hand, is not evidence of innocence. Yesterday, in Sydney Australia a man slit a woman’s throat, killed her, and stabbed several others and had only some blood on his hand. You think OJ would be covered in blood but he probably wasn’t. He got Ron from behind and Ron didn’t stand a chance.
MEng you think that 1.5 CC’s of blood would account for ALL the blood evidence found?? Lol. It’s not adding up. I can’t prove that evidence wasn’t planted, but I can tell you that there is way more blood collected from the crime scenes than was missing from a vial that probably lost some blood once they pulled the stopper out of the vial. It happens.
MEng btw....if you collected blood evidence wrong, and didn’t allow the sample to dry before it was put into plastic, as mazola did, the blood decomposes. It means the DNA is not pristine. The blood was found on the gate, right? A painted gate. Do you know what is in paint? EDTA. And, it was collected correctly. This means you have a much more pristine sample.
heidstra kept talking and answering questions despite objections by the lawyers that Ito had to rule on as to whether the question was okay. heidstra did it 3 times before ito blew his stack at him.
Darden is right. This was a domestic violence case, not a racial issue. Poor Goldman was in the wrong place at the wrong time. A witness claims to have heard “hey, hey, heyyy” this is obviously where Goldman walks upon Simpson killing Nicole.
I never understood why people completely dismissed the racial angle when the guy who found most of the evidence is on tape saying that he often plants evidence on black guys that dated white women. There was a racial angle b/c the initial lead on the case was a disgusting racist who said he planted evidence before. I also don't understand why people ignore the solid proof that evidence was planted. People refuse to even consider it.
MEng you’re misunderstanding me. It shouldn’t have been a case about race. It became one. Obviously because of Furhman and his disgusting racism. It should have just been about DV. It became about race.
@@Polarcutter Naw, Rob knew OJ was innocent from day 1. He (Rob Kardashian) knew Nicole was a dope fiend, and her lifestyle unfortunately got her throat slit from ear to ear.
Edgar Estrada Jr did you see the monstrosity he hooked up with after acquittal? It was a drugged out meth head. You can’t tell me he wasn’t using drugs too. The FBI raided his house for ecstasy. They don’t raid your home for no reason.
@@michaelkirkpatrick7483 He just didn't use the N word. This is someone who has said if he saw an interracial couple, he would make up something to stop them if there was no reason. Someone who is genocidal.
F. Lee Bailey was a lousy attorney. Except for O.J., his famous clients lost their cases. Sam Shepard & Patty Hearst both went to jail. Shepard later had his guilty verdict overturned, but Bailey had long since moved on.
Ray Davison In Sam Shepard’s first trial, he was represented by William Corrigan, not F. Lee Bailey. Bailey took over as Shepard’s attorney after Corrigan died,and later won his release.
Lol they maid a movie about Shepard. Bailey definitely got him off. And patty hurst obviously went to jail. But she didn’t get death penalty, that was the win for bailey with hurst
ANYONE PLEASE ANSWER THIS QUESTION...IF IT WAS A FRAME-UP BY THE COPS HOW DID THEY KNOW OJ DIDN'T HAVE AN ALIBI SUCH AS BEING AT A PARTY OR ON A TV SHOW?
dave Try again slick. La Times: Blood on a sock retrieved from O. J Simpson's bedroom and on the gate behind Nicole Brown Simpson's home did not contain a preservative, but only some vague and inconclusive hints of one, a scientist from the Federal Bureau of Investigation testified today at Mr. Simpson's trial. Defense lawyers called the F.B.I. special agent, Roger Martz, to buttress their claims that corrupt police officers removed the Simpsons' blood from test tubes containing an anti-coagulating substance used in laboratories, EDTA, and sprinkled it on the sock and gate. DNA tests have all but proved that the blood on the sock was Mrs. Simpson's, and that the blood smeared on the gate matched Mr. Simpson's. But Mr. Martz said there was no proof that the chemical on the two exhibits was EDTA and even if it were, that it was not of the concentration found in preserved blood. "Everyone is saying that I found EDTA, but I am not saying that," said Mr. Martz, chief of the F.B.I.'s chemistry toxicology unit, with a hint of frustration. "I was asked to determine whether those blood stains came from preserved blood. Those blood stains did not come from preserved blood."
dave The FBI did reveal the testing parameters. Agent Martz was their witness, and used his own blood,to test whether we all have a chemical similar to EDTA in our blood . Guess what ? We do. The compound (measured in ppm)that looked like EDTA in the samples from the gate and the sock, matched Agent Martz’s sample levels, proving that we all have a little of it in our systems. Key point, none of the samples were at a level showing it came from a sample vial. If you’d read anything on this case , which I’m going to assume you have, you’d know that once OJs sample was collected, sealed in a vial, placed in an envelope and sealed again, it had to have a chain of custody reference number. Philip Vanatter couldn’t assign that number himself, he had to give it to the criminalist Dennis Fung who was actually collecting the evidence, and noting reference numbers and order of evidence found. Where was Dennis Fung? He was at OJs , so Vanatter delivered the sample to Fung there, roughly 2 hours after it was taken as they were finishing up. What does this mean? This means that Simpson’s sample had already been noted, photographed and collected from both scenes,before OJs sample was taken or even delivered to Fung. Everything in life isn’t a conspiracy theory. Fact is...all of the blood collected other than the victims was OJs to a ratio of like 1in 21 billion,that it was anyone other than him. Another fact...the defense didn’t deny that any of that blood was OJs. Their theory was it was planted. When you look at the timeline,it’s easy to see the planting theory is impossible. The evidence isn’t made up, fabricated or planted. It all points to OJ. The blood evidence. The fiber evidence. No alibi Story kept changing He had the motive He had the time Suicide note Bronco chase Providing details of how he might have committed the crime (in a book). Who the hell does that? Does an interview describing how he would have done it...making statements like “I remember grabbing the knife “ “I remember this guy getting into a karate stance” There are guys on death row right now convicted on one percent of the evidence that was collected in this case. Again, everything isn’t a conspiracy. Maybe read: Murder in Brentwood Without a doubt
dave You like jumping around on topics don’t you? Lol, doesn’t change the facts I listed. His blood at the murder scene, mixed with victims in his vehicle and on a glove. No one denies it. It’s proven to be his and his blood and the victims blood are in places they should not be. No one has said there were cuts on the gloves. Theory has always been that the left glove was pulled off due the struggle with Ron. I’ve seen the evidence photos of those gloves up close.No cuts, but they sure were messed up around the areas of the palm. Another big point you seriously seem to be missing. Your statements about no one seeing cuts on his hand goes out the window when he states in his police interview on June 13th,1994....that he cut himself and was bleeding BEFORE going to Chicago. That was his explanation as to why his blood was in the Bronco, trailing up his driveway and in his house. So, if he’s admitted he’s bleeding (coincidentally on the night and time his ex wife was murdered two miles away)at his home,why would anyone need to plant blood at his home?
Why every think nicol was da target I believe Ron was follow oj is not a murderer only a heartless murderer would leave da mother of da kids slaughter left outside beside whoever killed Ron an Nicole did not knows kids were n that house
The only bit they missed out is Rosa Lopez because she was a defence witness who was Oj Simpson's maid at the night of the murders who saw the bronco at 10:05 pm and turned out to be a liar.
And yet she wasn't prosecuted for perjury, but Mark Fuhrman was, regarding totally irrelevant stuff. Loads of other defence witnesses lied or gave false testimony too, like Sylvia Guerra, Lenore Walker, Henry Lee and John Gerdes.
@@philipwilliams1754 Its on Wikipedia and there is a source, I'm not your research machine. If the sources were not reliable, it would've have been taken down. She said she and Sylvia Guerra were each offered $5,000 to lie for Simpson.
The socks had identical blood stains on both sides. Only 2 ways that happens. Oj had a hole in his ankle or it was placed on an unworn sock. Edta was just on the blood. Not on the entire sock. Not saying oj was innocent or guilty. But it's obvious that evidence was planted.
flunder50 Testimony from the FBI...DNA tests have all but proved that the blood on the sock was Mrs. Simpson's, and that the blood smeared on the gate matched Mr. Simpson's. But Mr. Martz said there was no proof that the chemical on the two exhibits was EDTA and even if it were, that it was not of the concentration found in preserved blood. Everyone is saying that I found EDTA, but I am not saying that," said Mr. Martz, chief of the F.B.I.'s chemistry toxicology unit, with a hint of frustration. "I was asked to determine whether those blood stains came from preserved blood. Those blood stains did not come from preserved blood." If the blood on the socks was still wet,when they were taken off it would have bled through from one side to the other.
@@bigdaddycool4242 Blood dries fast, there's no way it'll bleed through and make a mirror image unless it was planted. And there was EDTA in the blood on both the socks and the gate.
@@Iammricoflly ---Finally after the trial was over and Jury deliberations had begun,Clark turned over ''Contact prints'' of the crime scene.Scheck motioned the court for a hearing.He states he has photos of the crime scene,which shows blood on Andrea Scotts' car and a blood trail leading away.
@@Iammricoflly --Lots of reading,some of this came up during the criminal trial.Imagine this your on trial,my car and keys were found at the murder scene,and no one took a statement from me,my car was not searched and I testified in no trials.Vanatter returned her car and keys the same day.
I’m not understanding why the witnesses are saying words like, he seemed normal, he was fine… they have nothing to compare his actions too. Also, it’s subjective on how they felt about him
Karlo Carl he also never once during the bronco chase whilst on the phone to Lange say “I’m innocent. LAPD are setting me up. That’s not my blood you found at the crime scene” never once. Instead, he said “I’m the only person who deserves to die. I know you’re just doing your jobs” and if I was innocent,I certainly wouldn’t be saying THAT.
@@pommiebears He did say that he is innocent on the phone. Also on the suicide letter. Get your facts straight. Dude is 100% innocent. Ojsimpson.co - for all the real facts.
Well, he is well into his 70s. The Muther F er does not have tons of time left. So long. if there is a hell or karma and judgement at death, his nightmare is only beginning.
If you take leather gloves or any leather and soak it in liquid it will shrink. Plus put on a pair of rubber gloves under the leather gloves and they sure wont fit.
Good thing they don't make shoes, jackets, ski gloves or any other article of clothing that regularly comes into contact with liquid out of leather...........
I thought with pcr that it’s a comparison so they are testing to see if it’s a match. If oj dna there then it’s a hit. Other dna may be there but they aren’t comparing to that. But this was a long time ago so I may be misremembering. I know this was an issue in the kercher murder and the pcr dna testing they did in that case.
The Dream Team of lawyers worked the butts off for a whole year and O J didn’t pay most of their money 💰, they literally worked for free . I hope they’re hunted for this for the rest of their lives
Hogwash!! He paid them upfront huge sums of money. Witnesses were paid $100k. I don't think anyone was hunted, this is their job and they won. The civil trial lawyer got burnt because the judgement in that case bankrupted OJ.
Why? They're defense lawyers. I'd rather live in a system where occasionally murderers get off than a system where you can't competently defend yourself to the fullest of your abilities. Also, the publicity was worth more than those lawyers could have ever made during that year. It made them all household names. The only one with serious nationwide recognition prior was F. Lee Bailey.
They made more than enough on book deals so I doubt they’re complaining. Literally Tv networks and whole new careers and fame came out of this trial. Oj made lots of people overnight millionaires . It was an entire industry
Once Fhurman planted the Rockingham glove,it threw the investigation off.Both glove's has blood on the front finger area,none on the back.Blood should've been on the back if you are holding a knife or your fist are clenched, punching,stabbing and slashing.Both glove's has fine dog hair embedded in the blood.Meaning OJ lost both gloves at Bundy,finds one and runs away.Jumps this fence and drops it again.
@@Iammricoflly there was no forensic evidence linking Jason . The fingerprints do not match O.J. Simpson, anyone in the family, Bundy Neighbors or LAPD staff. There was more than one set of unidentified fingerprints.William Dears theory also falls short as Goldman’s knuckles and boots show contact with a person who suffer trauma such as a black eye, bruises busted lip and or broken bones . Jason was seen present walking around with no physical injuries
He should use this and Vegas to sue the NFL. He clearly has suffered from the effects of CTE for a long time ....the murders in 94 fit the symptoms of it., so does Vegas......look at Aaron Hernandez and what he did and then look at his brain after the fact....Simpson is still alive, maybe he could make light with treating or diagnosing CTE to living people and help to treat it.
Scott V Aaron was paranoid off that pcp shit 1 dude was so twisted off that shit he cut his own dick off that shit make u do some ridiculous shit Aaron had too much to lose to risk it but he had a history of violence so he can't blame it on cte he just was cray cray
@@spazarellapoet8735 he has been diagnosed with the most advanced case of cte in history.....not saying he didn't do drugs....I'm sure he did....but the cte caused all his changes, paranoia rage all of that can be attributed to cte....I'm sure the drugs only made him worse but you can't say he didn't suffer from CTE, cause he's been diagnosed since his death
No it wouldnt. The defense proved it. LAPD had OJs blood 13 hours after the murders. When they booked the vial 20% was missing the same amount they "found"
Jim Jim how did they plant his blood, found before he was home from Chicago, and before they had taken ANY blood from him? They didn’t have his blood until he got home, yet the blood drops were found much earlier. I suppose you’re going to tell me that they swopped the blood, right? Still can’t find that Lenor Walker testimony anywhere. I have honestly looked.
@@pommiebears Through disgustingly bad forensics. Did you know that the criminologists admitted to spilling OJs blood and he said he didn't remember if he changed gloves afterwards? This was between testing the reference sample from oj and testing drops from the scene.
Jim jim you are not that stupid you think vanatter a 30 year veteran approaching retirement would plant oj blood and risk everything perhaps even his own freedom for what he had nothing against on he just made a mistake and did not immediately register the blood come on I k ow you're.not that damn stupid you're pulling my leg right
@@philipwilliams1754 Ah, its Mr N again 😅😅 The racist N who supports a murderer because he's black and the victims were right. The braindead N who believes that all of a sudden, because of that, the LAPD were the new CIA and tried to frame someone. The racist N who pisses on the graves of innocent white people. The sexist N who supports the concept of honour among wife beaters (OJ Simpson and Johnnie Cochran). And the condescending N who will likely go and support Amber Heard when she puts the LAPD on trial so she can win against Johnny Depp.
@@TDKiller415 For starters the most incriminating blood was found on the Bundy back gate 3wk's after the murders,after the property was washed down.Laden with EDTA.
You don't know that he's guilty. Barry Scheck made it very clear that evidence was both planted and the forensics people were incompetent. Even if ok was guilty, the evidence of corruption points to an easy not guilty verdict. People who say that they KNOW he's guilty know nothing about the case or they're liars.
@@bigdaddycool4242 I think the blood on sock and the back gate were planted. Both were found a month later and neither fit. The dna on the back gate was exposed to the elements for a month but had the most dna. The blood on the sock had soaked through to the other side which meant it didn't have a leg in it and it was pressed on. Fwiw, the burden of proof isn't on the defense... But the prosecution had no explanation for these facts.
MEng Lmao! Say the blood on the gate and the sock was planted...how do you explain all the other blood found at the crime scene that came back to OJ. Or, the blood on the glove at OJs , or OJs blood and the victims blood in the locked Bronco?🤷🏻♂️ You know, all that blood that was noted in police reports, then photographed, and then collected hours before Simpson returned from Chicago to give his sample.
"Best lawyers money can buy." In other words, a plea bargain lawyer, a civil rights lawyer, an appeal lawyer, a DNA expert whose future goal is to prove INNOCENCE, and a felon of DUI 🤣🤣 And how did they win? By putting the system on trial for racism and unproved lies instead of defendig their client. What a joke 😅😅😅
@@andrewdunn49ers They never proved that Fuhrman and Vannatter lied about anything relevant to the case. They fooled Fuhrman into pleading the fifth, thats not the same as admitting to falsifying evidence. When you defend your client, you attack the evidence, for instance what Barry Scheck was trying, even though his arguments were bullshit, but THATS the way to go. Scheck later started the innocence project to attack wrongful convictions and get innocent people off. Introducing race into the trial was not a matter of defending OJ Simpson, it was attacking the LAPD with lies and allegations. That was why judge Hiroshi Fujisaki kept all baseless allegations out of the civil trial and OJ lost. And besides, if Fuhrman and Vannatter had falsified any evidence, SOMEONE would've told on them and they would've gone to the gas chamber. Why would Vannatter, in his 27 year career with no civil complaints whatsoever, suddenly have a change of heart and want to frame OJ Simpson in the first place? Why would Fuhrman exonerate Arrick Harris but then try to frame OJ Simpson? You can't base an argument based on allegations. Cochran and Bailey would have demanded Fuhrman's clothes if they really believed he planted the glove, to see if there was any blood on his clothes, but they didn't, because they knew Fuhrman's clothes were clean and it was a risk they couldn't take, it would discredit the blood planting theory completely. If this was a widely accepted practice, putting the police on trial whenever there was an arrest, then the police officers who beat Rodney King would have gone to jail. The judge from the Latasha Harlins case would've been disbarred. There would be no legal system left because all the judges, prosecuters and police officers would lose their jobs because of conspiracy allegations 🤣🤣 OJ only won because he was popular and rich, thats it, and the media was on his side all the way
@@TDKiller415 Fuhrman and Vannatter never lied relevant to the case? What case are you talking about? Fuhrman plead guilty to perjury! Which by definition is lying about facts relevant to the case. Vanatter and Lange handling of blood viles was the only time in their long careers they had mishandled protocol personally carrying it around. SHADY. Are you familiar with Dr. Fung’s lies and blunders? Scheck started his project in 1992, before the trial. Get facts man. If you’re a defense lawyer in this case and REFUSE to attack the police on these blatant atrocities, you’re an AWFUL lawyer lol. I’m not even saying OJ was innocent but the lawyers did their job masterfully. To just bypass blatant bigotry, extremely shady blood handling malpractice you wouldn’t be doing the justice system right.
@@andrewdunn49ers exactly LAPD was caught in multiple lies and perjurious statements. The media and courts wanted to give them a pass as they wanted a guilty verdict at all cost. The Civil Trial ignored all of this tampering of evidence and contamination which as blatant just to give the Public what they wanted.
Lisa Berry absolutely no evidence whatsoever to believe he did this. None. He was just like other serial killers....he wanted another feather in his cap. I can guarantee he didn’t do it.
ron said hey hey hey because when he opened the gate one of the navy seals pointed a gun at him and slammed the gate behind him and told him if he talked he would be dead
I'm not defending OJ but no wonder they lost the case, because there was just not enough evidence like I said on previous comments.. She claimed that he was physically abusive and yet she writes a letter saying that she never wanted to leave him??? COME ON!!
Edgar Estrada Jr There was plenty of evidence in this case. There was blood, fiber evidence, motive. Many battered women don’t want to leave their abuser. My guess is , she finally had enough and told him so just weeks before.
Not enough evidence? Lol. His blood on the crime scene, victim's blood on the bronco, bloody glove in his property, victim"s blood on his socks and cut on his hand, history of abuse, bronco esvape, the shoes. I'm sure people are on death row for much less
Rodriguez Thiago Sadly, you’re right. Some would rather believe a conspiracy than what is staring them right in the face. But hey, they played smoke and mirrors and won🤷🏻♂️
markmac I agree with you on that timeline. I think he killed Nicole around 10 and then Ron showed up a little after. The dog barking doesn’t necessarily mean that’s when the murders occurred.Then again, maybe it happened just like his hypothetical confession. I’m trying to remember where I read it, but I read that Nicole, while with OJ had called 911 nine times. Think about that. How many times have any of us called 911? I know I haven’t called that many times in my life ,lol! I also read that when the prosecution interviewed witnesses, friends and family, they noted something like 60 plus incidents where OJ physically or verbally abused Nicole.
Spazarella Poet Johnny Cochran didn’t represent Michael in his 2003 trial in which he was acquitted, Tom Mesereau was his attorney. Johnny Cochran was the one who negotiated the $23 million dollar payout in 1993. If you’re innocent, why are you negotiating and paying a settlement?
Edward Van Buren no shit I'm saying johnnie the man for getting oj off in the early 90's when all odds was against them just like tom got mike off in the 2000's I know about the 93 settlement but we see even when given a not guilty verdict people still think they both guilty regardless of facts or fate as it played out.
Spazarella Poet So, he got a double murderer off and got a pedophile off🤔 Maybe a good attorney, but his methods are questionable and he’s literally no better than the pieces of shit he got off. Good old Johnny himself was a wife beater.
💢I was the only Black kid in my school in '94.We buried a time capsule and I wanted to put something inside that represented my people... We dug it up yesterday!! Along with the Chromes,Magic The Gathering cards,and Ninja Turtles....my 2 photos of OJ Simpson and Bill Cosby.☹
He did it but the state tainted the evidence and couldn’t prove their case. If I was on the jury I would have voted not guilty. This entire case was a joke!
Ito did nothing to prevent this circus. He was the one who turned it into a circus. His often passive aggressive approach had undertones of narcissistic behaviour that was obvious. He just loved the attention.
My question is...and I'm not defending OJ by any means...abuse is abuse no matter how you slice it...but was Nicole some little innocent lamb in the woods just minding her own business...or was she into some.questionable stuff?
Oj lost the civil trial though and remarked "this is far from over", when pressed to clarify what he meant he said "I'm going to kill more people what do you think I meant?"
Osvaldo Encarnacion He wasn’t seen from 9:45 til 1054 pm. That’s an hour and nine minutes.Nicole’s condo is 2-3 miles away. Takes 5 minutes to get there. Take out the round trip drive and you’ve got roughly an hour to commit this crime.
@@bigdaddycool4242 Did you watch the video? The prosecutions theory centers as round the barking dog. The witnesses who were outside that night b/w 10:15 - 10:35 all testified to hearing no barking dogs. 2 of those witnesses heard no barking dogs until after 10:35. Allen Park saw OJ standing on his driveway at approximately 10:55. That's 20 minutes so where are you getting an hour from? Plus the partially melted ice cream on the kitchen counter shows that she had to have been alive somewhere close to 11:00. Otherwise it would have been completely melted by the time the bodies were discovered after 12:00. Did you even research before you commented?
bull6599 Did YOU even read my comment? Prosecution theory is exactly that ..a Theory. Just because a dog was heard barking doesn’t mean the murders occurred at that very moment. And, if you do the math, from 9:40(last time OJ was seen by Kato) til 10:55 (when he was seen by Allen Park)is an hour and fifteen minutes. Nicole lived 2 miles away. It takes 5-7 minutes to get there, depending on traffic. Take out that 10-14 minutes round trip drive and you’ve got what? Roughly an hour that OJ had to commit the crime. Also, the last time anyone spoke to Nicole was her mother, and that call ended at 9:42-9:46 pm. I guess in the middle of June no one would possibly have the A/C on in their home potentially keeping the ice cream from melting 🤷🏻♂️ Maybe you should work on your reading comprehension before you comment.
@@bigdaddycool4242 Air conditioning would delay the rate at which it melted, not stop it. It would have to practically be freezing to stop ice cream from melting over a 2 plus hour period. Also Ron Goldman didn't even clock out at Mezzaluna until as round 9:50.
bull6599 So, you’re changing directions now? Ron Goldman clocked out at 9:35, hung out with another waiter and left at 9:50. His apartment was like a 5 minute walk away. He drove a friends car to Nicole’s,also 5 minutes away from his apartment. If he left at 9:50, walked home, changed and drove to Nicole’s, that puts him there roughly 10:10-10:15?
He’s so guilty! I lived in Los Angeles and we all called him the “The Butcher of Brentwood” when he’d try and hang out at Starbucks. Luckily he got ran out of town. NO ONE WANTED HIM IN OUR CITY. He’s a monster
@@daffyduckfan4478 both cases were handled horribly, and theres no justice for either ... but for blacks to jump up for joy when OJ was found not guilty is crazy , he played the black race and made everyone look like fools , OJ wanted nothing to do with the black population ... its very sad that all races cant see what the real problem is and figure out a solution to fix it ...
*Cochran:* _"This case is not about race..."_ *[Yet uses "Cops framed OJ, because cops have systemic racist issues" as defense]* *[Then chuckles, accuses and yawns at the prosecution]* *[10 Years later, undergoes brain surgery]* *Cochran:* _"I'm feeling well and am in good health"_ *[A year later, dies from a brain tumor]* As Han Solo said to Luke Skywalker, _"Don't get cocky, kid!"_
eric Mays His blood at the murder scene says he’s guilty. The victims blood, mixed with his in his vehicle, says he’s guilty. His blood, mixed with the victims on a glove at his house, a glove his ex wife happened to buy for him says he’s guilty. His ex wife’s blood along with his , on a sock in his bedroom, says he’s guilty. He might have been found “not guilty” in court, but he’s far from innocent.
The not guilty verdict is simple. It was payback for Rodney King so O.j. should thank Rodney. I dont blame the jury for that because what happened to Rodney was some bs. LAPD needed a change and this was the turning point.
That’s the mainstream media spin. But if you’ve studied law, you’d see why OJ was acquitted. Not saying OJ isn’t a murderer, just that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt.
The only thing that Kato did was stop OJ from committing the crime sooner. When OJ knocked on Kato's door and said he was going to grab some McDonalds, and that he needed smaller notes to tip the sky cap or something like that, he was using McDonalds as his alibi, he had the bronco all loaded up with the weapon etc, not expecting Kato to invite himself along to go get something to eat also. So he had to go along with it, knowing it was going to put pressure on him to be back from committing the crime much sooner knowing the limo driver was going to be there to collect him at a certain time too. It was noted that it was a little strange that they took his Bentley simply to go get McDonald's drive through but it was surmised that this was because he had a weapon and a spare change of clothes, basically the bronco all loaded up to commit the crime, and hence why he didn't want to take the little "runaround car" on such a small trip on this occasion as he normally would. It should be noted that had Kato not invited himself along then OJ would have made it to Bundy to commit the crime a good 20-30mins before he actually did, therefore Ron would not have been an innocent by stander to the crime, and instead would most likely have been the first person to find her dead. So sad how these things unravel... how 1 decision by another person can effect the next person's life, or in this case, end a person's life.
How anyone with the benefit of 24 years hindsight plus watching this video can still believe OJ Simpson was the killer is not very smart. 20 minutes to kill two people, return home and clean up to meet the limo driver to the airport? CRAZY!!!
If your comment is directed at me then I have to ask you the same rhetorical question. Even Lou Waters opening remarks to this video state accurately the following facts: "No murder weapon, no witness and no clear motive". So I guess people like me still exist because were intelligent even if we exist in smaller numbers than imbeciles like you.
50 years from now, people will still be talking about O.J... and the murders
And OJ will still be looking for the “real” killers. It would be interesting to see the evidence checked again with modern techniques. I’m surprised the “dream team” hasn’t done this to prove he’s innocent and to find those real killers that remain out there.
@@at6686 waste of time he was set free... then the idiot still ended up going to prison anyway
yeah very likely
@@at6686 Nicoles mother told the Coroners office ,she last spoke to Nicole past 11pm.That's in the Coroners report.
@@at6686 hay butt cheeks! 1st off your Narcissism is showing within your choice of verbiage! 2ndly You also have another "ISM" clearly sticking it's evil little head out! Thee other "ISM" is that of RACE!!! As a courtesy I shall not speak out that word completely within my text! The Dream Team you speak of ACTually has already done those things you mention within your suggestions that they should try in order to prove Orenthal's Innocence with today's tech! Guess What A T? Sir Mr. Orenthal James Simpson a.k.a. O. J. Is Innocent Now! InFacto O.J. Has Been Innocent even before he was arrested!
Cop who found the glove pleads the 5th. Reasonable doubt, period
But the jury were never shown or told that. Which in itself I think would have gotten oj a new trial if he’d been convicted.
I love the mid-90s music and graphics, Law & Order-like yet it's a real case unfolding.
thanks for the upload!
Love that video. Thanks
R.i.p Emmit Till and Latasha Harling let us not forget real injustice in America
RIP. Philadelphia police officer Daniel Faulkner let's not forget not all police are are bad.... kill mumia ...kill him now ...
Tim Gaynor The officer did get justice. Abu Jamal is in prison for the rest of his life. Emmett tTill A teenage child brutalized and murdered off of a proven lie that he “whistled” at a white woman. And Another teenage child, Latasha Harlins, who simply was buying orange juice before school was murdered by an Asian store clerk. The Asian store clerk was fined $500 and sentenced to five years of probation and 400 hours of community service but no prison time for her crime. Where is the justice in that? Please don’t get me started on the 16th street baptist church bombing which hurt 22 human beings killing four little girls. Innocent children going to church. Any convictions? There has been thousands of injustices in this country. But the children; The children it’s shameful, fueled thru unnecessary Hatred. Hatred turned what should be the greatest most opportunistic country a pure joke.
eric Mays and Sandra bland, Trayvon , kj that boy they lied and said suffocated in a gym mat and they stole his organs, oh and all them people killed in rosewood cause they lady lied about being raped by black man.
Spazarella Poet Kendrick Johnson’s organs weren’t viable for transplants. The funeral home, that offered to pay for his funeral, cut corners instead of doing the right thing and embalming his organs that had come, after autopsy, in a bag. They instead threw them out and stuffed his body with newspapers. Is it right? Absolutely not. But, that is what happened. After days of being upside down in a Matt, I can assure you, KJ’s organs would have been well into decomposition. How he got into the matt, I still don’t honestly know. I have my feelings....but, those aren’t proof of foul play.
Agree Eric Mayes comments Emmitt Till
The LAPD losing the most obvious case ever, and embarrassing everyone in that judicial system is a sick form of karma at the expense of two innocent souls for all the bad shit they did during those times
Im sorry but 25 min and virtually nothing DNA WISE
You thinking OJ is guilty shows that you’ve done no homework and you’re just a mainstream media robot.
they were not innocent!! OJ had an alibi he was asleep waiting to take this trip to chicago.. Nicole was a heavy drug user where OJ was going to take away the kids from her and ron was a DEA SNITCH!!
Cochran took charge of this team. Especially this question.
They were really a dream team of attorneys. They did their work very well.
They weren't all that great. Barry Scheck was great and he demolished all the forensics. Cochran was great at giving the media quotables. B/c the truth of the matter is that the media was totally pro prosecution. OJ's defense would have a GREAT day and the media would tell everyone how bad it was. You can google some of it. The day that Bailey got Fuhrman to perjur himself....the media said it was a great day and Fuhrman looked really composed.
In the end, the case wasn't even that close. The jury which included white people and a Spanish guy came back after a few hours with a not guilty verdict. This case is just more proof that fake news isn't new.
ER GLL by lying? It doesn’t take a dream team to take the evidence and suggest tampering. It certainly doesn’t take a dream team to impeach someone. It doesn’t take a dream team to ask ANYONE if they’ve ever used the N word and win that argument, which had nothing to do with the case. It just took a ridiculous judge who enjoyed the limelight way too much. It takes an attorney like in the civil suit, who can depose Simpson, to win......because OJ is OJ’s worst evidence.
@@pommiebears --The defense scientist's, Dr Lee included destroyed the Prosecution.Ito rulings were anti OJ.
@@philipwilliams1754i agree. Dr. Lee was and is considered of the best forensic scientists in the world i think and he supported some of the defense's theory on the evidence.
ER GLL It’s not just about that the truth was in the jury face from the get go Orenthal James Simpson not guilty.
"Hey Hey Hey....?Dam Bill Cosby did this Shit!
If you beLIEve that there is anything funny about an almost 80 year old man doing 3 years in the joint?!!
😂😂😂
Where's the rest of this series? Very hard to find
If only dogs could talk....
They wouldve said the dog was a racist
I didn't see anything on the glove not fitting was it in this video?
OJ didn't need the Dream Team ... He only needed Barry Scheck
Barry did a lot of good work but this one he got wrong
No he needed Cochran. Cochran was the one who could manipulate the African American community because he knew how to play on their emotions. That first, and then Scheck to vomit the "cesspool of contamination" theory. Cochran had to first turn the savages against the victims, and then Scheck had to turn the savages against law enforcement. OJ needed both of them.
@@TDKiller415 True but they had to be susceptible to that approach which they were revenge factor.Plus the defense was skilled at jury selection.
@@randyharris3175 Exactly, they tried digging up dirt on the white jurors to remove them for stupid reasons, while the prosecution were trying to remove the black jurors who had deliberately been dishonest on the questionnaire. They made the mistake of not holding the trial in Santa Monica, the nearest to where the murders happened. Vincent Bugliosi pointed out the mistake that Garcetti made in his 7h analysis video of the case, he and Garcetti had actually talked about it and Garcetti admitted he made a mistake.
@@TDKiller415 Yep I'm a big fan of Buglioi on this case and the Kennedy case.
Wasn't there another part of this documentary breaking down the prosecutions case and the verdict?
There were three videos in this collection that used to be on RUclips. There's this one, which describes the defence case.
Then there was another one, describing the prosecution case.
Do you have that one ?
I think there might have been a third too. It would be excellent to get the other videos in this series. If the uploader has them, or could tell me where to get them, that'd be awesome and highly appreciated. Thanks allot.
Totally agree, I would love the other videos as well, please let me know if you get them
@@delateane1 Thanks for the reminder. I thought I might have downloaded them a while ago. I'll check my oj collection
There is a first part to this doc covering the prosecution case. Anyone know where that might be?
No!!! I'm looking for that part where
His Ex- Wife Margaritet testify
Agint Him
@@gailtaylor9154 that never happened.
Oh!!! Ok
Dino DNA. The 90’s pushed DNA into the mainstream. It worked.
There were at least 5 reasonable doubts in that case. 1. Vannatter taking OJ's vile of blood to both the crime scene and to OJ's home. 2. Trying the gloves on in front of the jury that obviously showed that it did not fit. 3. Furhman being exposed as a racist.
4.EDTA preservative found on OJ's socks. This suggested that the blood was more than likely planted on his socks. 5. Overall contamination of the crime scene, i.e. LAPD and the criminologists at the crime scene. This is why and how the not guilty verdict came about.. Now, don't blame the jurors. Blame the prosecution and the LAPD. Per the law, in any criminal trial where there is at least one reasonable doubt presented in that case, the jury has to acquit. Don't believe me? Research what the law says about reasonable doubt in a criminal case. I'm going to school for this so yes, I know what I'm talking about. Putting aside the fact that OJ Simpson more than likely murdered two people, the fault lies with the LAPD and the prosecution for letting a murderer walk due to their own lack of competence. Calling the jurors stupid for abiding by the law makes me thankful that most people in this country are not called to serve on any jury.
I agree Peace. Even though I believe OJ was guilty, there was plenty of reasonable doubt in this case. Fortunately for OJ he had the resources to afford the types of lawyers that could exploit that doubt. If he was broke and went in with a Public Defender, he'd probably be dead by now (executed).
Only an idiot would have rendered that verdict. 12 of them. End of story.
Are you aware that a small amount of EDTA is in our blood at any 1 time, as it is things like laundry liquid which gets into the fibres of our clothes and in turn into our blood stream etc... that EDTA argument was so disingenuine. The Defense new it. They argued so many points that knew not to be true. They played a dirty, dirty game and unfortunately for Ron and Nicole, won. If it had not been for the 1 detective (Furhman) who did find that second glove, and if it had been any other cop, the defense would never have been able to use the argument that it was quite possibly planted. There was absolutely no evidence of planting of any kind. Every other cop and detective who was on the scene at Bundy long before Furhman turned up sighted 1 glove and 1 glove only. How could Furhman have suddenly turned up and found the left handed glove unbeknownst to anyone else there, put it in a baggy, then his car then went all the way to Rockingham and dropped it outside Kato Kaelin's bungalow especially when at that time he didn't know for sure what OJ's alibi was, if anything he was given the impression that OJ had been in Chicago during the time of the murders, so the idea of a smart detective planting evidence and risking sacrificing his entire career all on guess work is completely absurd. The defense knew how incriminating that glove was along with the blood evidence so they had to somehow try to cast the seed of doubt in the jurors minds however they could. It was disgusting. As I've mentioned under other videos about this case, I am from Australia originally, and I know for a fact that many people all around the world, outside of the US could look at this case very differently. We could see exactly what game the Defense was playing, the way they took an incredibly sensitive topic like civil rights and racism within the LAPD and use as leveridge for their client who had never wanted anything to do with the black community up until that point. Had no black pride, and going so far as to completely sever himself from being identified as a black man altogether. Disgusting! The Scheme Team, as his Defense is also known.
MsB inNYC-Wrong,if EDTA is in your blood you die.
Dan OD-They were brilliant,they knew a frame up when they saw one.
What happened to the other parts of this special? The case for the prosecution and the verdict?
?
Can anyone explain to me why the blood on the sock had soaked through? The bloody socks are a HUGE mystery if anyone approaches them honestly. The socks were examined like 2/3 times and nobody saw the quarter sized blood stain...it's was oddly found like a month later.
More on the blood soaking through....it was proven that the blood on the sock would've dried in a couple minutes. Yet the blood had soaked through the sock. This means that there wasn't a foot in the sock when the blood got on it. Dr. Lee showed further proof that the blood had to be pressed onto the sock in order to get it to soak through to the other side. This presented a real challenge to the prosecutors and they had no explanation for why this blood stain was found a month later and apparently pressed through the sock.
Heck, the sock wasn't even in the initial video that the police took. It showed up in pictures later that day but it was staged differently in different photos...why would the police move the evidence around the scene?
Dr Lee great on the socks blood was pressed on socks
Yes why they lost the case
The judge was a lightweight
Hey Eric May's I agree with you on emmitt till but this case does not play
Johnny Cochran was an amazing lawyer and stood up to the system. Respect. Rest in power King.
Johnny Cochran did not stand up to the system, he used the system. Not the first time this has happened.
Played the race card and beat the system
He didn't really do anything brilliant other than using race to manipulate a very susceptible jury.
He got all his money hidden by his attorney's smart he played everything like his football games to win
They didnt hide shit lol. They were helping him make $ by autographs.
@@lavarball8423 They cannot touch OJ Simpson incorporated.
OJ lawyers were impressive. Simple
If you’re guilty and you want to get off you’d better have a gang of scumbags like this bunch.
Johnnie Cochran
their skills were average, but they dressed very well.
@@at6686 Tell me the evidence.
@@philipwilliams1754
You’re kidding. The fact that he got off with the mountain of evidence of his guilt combined with his behavior makes his case almost unprecedented. People have been convicted, with literally a drop of blood, since his trial. Dishonest, even by lawyer standards, combined with ignorant, unsophisticated jurors who had an agenda made OJs trial almost a one off. Never see it again. People also forget that the civil trial was a laugher. There was no question in anyone’s mind who killed those people.
is there footage from the civiel case??
@markmac oké I never knew...(that he won his trail and lost the Civil case) Back then I saw some footage and the chase (with the bronco) on CNN here in Europe, but it did nt find my interest 25 years ago... Still can t believe how he got away with the 1st trail.....
Deposition tapes are in my trial playlist if you’re interested.
15 minutes to kill? That’s a standard MMA fight. No way did they fight for 15 minutes! That’s a bloody long time.
Pommie bears--OJ has a National Championship ring from USC.
Philip Williams ok.
15 minutes maybe if goldman had had a weapon. i'd say 2 minutes tops. Besides, OJ had a plane to catch..
@@michaelkirkpatrick7483 Why would OJ kill someone when he had a plane to catch? Why would he confidently think that he could commit this act with a knife, hide the weapon, clean himself up, change his clothes, get home, place his luggage into his limo, and get to the airport on time to board the plane?
@@michaelkirkpatrick7483basically
All there answer seemed rehearsed...
Why was Simpson allowed to make a statement if he didn't want to testify?
Simpson did testify,he told the Jury the glove didn't fit.
exactly.. could not believe ito just let him ramble on...
The lady with the watches was cringeworthy.
BTW: I think that O.J. did kill Ron & Nicole, but if I had been a juror at the trial, I would have had to vote "Not guilty" because the state didn't prove their case.
Ray Davison what more proof would you need? Blood at the crime scene. Hairs consistent with OJ’s in the hat. Gloves bought by Nicole at Bloomingdales. Bruno Magli shoes that were his size. Cut to his left hand, plus several other cuts and abrasions. Bronco fibres found on Ron’s shirt. That’s all without the socks, the glove found at Rockingham, and the blood on the gate....the three pieces of evidence the defence attacked as planted. You’re seriously saying that even without the “planted evidence” there wasn’t enough to prove he did this? Lol. Jeezus.
i take it you're black
@@michaelkirkpatrick7483: No. I think the prosecution bungled the case.
I am so white you have to shade your eyes if you look at me. 😊
I think at least two jurors had the same opinion right after the verdicts. That he was guilty but there was too much reasonable doubt. Years later at least two more say similar. If u watched the day to day there was a lot of things it’s just hard not to wonder if oj was framed.
I'm not a conspiracy theory fan at all, but I must admit there's a lot of stuff about this case that just doesn't make sense. Like how did OJ have no bruising or any injuries from Ronald Goldman if he had in fact killed him? Or that there were 2 sets of footprints (proven by Henry Lee) at the crime scene. And there's a lot more to it than that, but when you look at all the information carefully, I have to conclude it's quite possible OJ didn't commit the murders. Or at the very least he didn't do it alone. The one thing I don't doubt is that OJ does know the truth about what really happened.
SOTYfan
He had cuts and scratches on his left hand. He left a blood trail from Nicole’s body, down her walkway, out her back gate and into his vehicle. That trail picks back up at his house from his vehicle, up his driveway and into his house.
All of those blood drops came back to OJ. The defense attorneys never denied it was his blood. Their claim was it was planted. Blood samples were photographed and collected at both scenes , before OJs sample was even taken. So, there goes the planting theory because, you can’t plant what you don’t have yet.
The glove couldn’t have been planted, because every officer that responded to the murder scene witnessed one glove there.
The footprints.
There were not two sets of footprints, not in blood anyway. There were bloody footprints leading away from the bodies. The other prints Henry Lee found were prints in set concrete from when the walkway was put in. So, not prints from the crime itself.
You have his blood at the murder scene.
You have fibers from the carpet of his vehicle, on a knit cap,found by one of the bodies.
You have a bloody glove found at his home with his and the victims blood mixed together on and in it.
A glove that matches the one at the murder scene.
A glove that has his ex wife’s hair all over it.
You have his blood and the victims blood, inside his locked vehicle. Why is your ex-wife’s blood, and a complete strangers blood in your vehicle?
Why does a sock in your bedroom, have yours and your ex wife’s blood on it?
You have a cut on your hand, that he admitted he cut at his home,before going to Chicago. A cut that he coincidentally got the night his ex wife was murdered two miles away and was still bleeding nearly 12 hours after he got it.
That’s just the blood evidence.
There’s the Bronco chase.
The failed polygraph
The suicide letter
No alibi for 9:40pm til 10:56 pm, again coincidentally when the murders occurred 2 miles away.
All of that information points to one person.
@@bigdaddycool4242 Defense brought up numerous people who saw OJ at the airport who said that he didn't have any scratches on his hand. So you'd have to explain why OJ is dripping blood everywhere but didn't have open wounds.
FWIW, let's not get into how ridiculous it was to act like the blood on the back gate wasn't planted. They found that blood a month later and the DNA was higher quality than any other sample they had outside of the reference samples. You're telling me that a blood stain can sit outside for a month through rain and sun and hold up better than DNA that had seriously deteriorated after a couple hours?
In the end, we don't know if OJ did. We know that there was reasonable doubt. I'm far more confident that evidence was planted than I am that OJ did it.
SOTYfan there were not other shoe prints. Lee was wrong. It was found that the extra prints were, and still are, there. They were made by the builder who laid the concrete. He had accidentally stepped in the concrete. The other set match Ron’s boots. Only OJ’s Bruno Magli shoe prints are unaccounted for.....well, at the time of the case. It was obvious he owned them by the time the civil trial was heard. A lack of evidence, like the fact he only had several cuts and abrasions to his left hand, is not evidence of innocence. Yesterday, in Sydney Australia a man slit a woman’s throat, killed her, and stabbed several others and had only some blood on his hand. You think OJ would be covered in blood but he probably wasn’t. He got Ron from behind and Ron didn’t stand a chance.
MEng you think that 1.5 CC’s of blood would account for ALL the blood evidence found?? Lol. It’s not adding up. I can’t prove that evidence wasn’t planted, but I can tell you that there is way more blood collected from the crime scenes than was missing from a vial that probably lost some blood once they pulled the stopper out of the vial. It happens.
MEng btw....if you collected blood evidence wrong, and didn’t allow the sample to dry before it was put into plastic, as mazola did, the blood decomposes. It means the DNA is not pristine. The blood was found on the gate, right? A painted gate. Do you know what is in paint? EDTA. And, it was collected correctly. This means you have a much more pristine sample.
23:30 - why was Judge Ito so pissed off with Heidstra? Ito must have been the hall monitor during his grade school years.
heidstra kept talking and answering questions despite objections by the lawyers that Ito had to rule on as to whether the question was okay. heidstra did it 3 times before ito blew his stack at him.
Heidstra got mad at the prosecution and then changed his testimony to be defense friendly. Heidstra just wanted fame.
I thought Nicole's watch was found on her stopped at 10:00pm. ??
no, that was a rumor only
@@michaelkirkpatrick7483 Fact,her watch stopped at 9.59 am.
They should’ve called Tom lang to testify that would’ve changed the entire case
Darden is right. This was a domestic violence case, not a racial issue. Poor Goldman was in the wrong place at the wrong time. A witness claims to have heard “hey, hey, heyyy” this is obviously where Goldman walks upon Simpson killing Nicole.
I never understood why people completely dismissed the racial angle when the guy who found most of the evidence is on tape saying that he often plants evidence on black guys that dated white women. There was a racial angle b/c the initial lead on the case was a disgusting racist who said he planted evidence before. I also don't understand why people ignore the solid proof that evidence was planted. People refuse to even consider it.
MEng you’re misunderstanding me. It shouldn’t have been a case about race. It became one. Obviously because of Furhman and his disgusting racism. It should have just been about DV. It became about race.
@@Meng776 that a fair and reasonable point you made. Good point
@@pommiebears i just wanna make sure i understand what your saying. Are you saying the criminal case should have just been about DV and not murder?
Sul Muhammad no, no, no....but, DV had a huge place IN this case. DV often leads to murder by both men and women. I hope that clarifies my comment.
The look on Kardashian’s face when the verdict was read says it all….
Yep glad this is over my friend gets to go home! RIP Mr. Kardashian you helped your innocent friend walk out that courtroom a free man.
@@rashun506 The look was total disbelief.
@@Polarcutter More like the look I'm glad this is over.
@@rashun506 I don’t know, looks like he couldn’t believe OJ got away with it. Kinda stunned..
@@Polarcutter Naw, Rob knew OJ was innocent from day 1. He (Rob Kardashian) knew Nicole was a dope fiend, and her lifestyle unfortunately got her throat slit from ear to ear.
What's funny is that after the trial Paula kicked OJ's ass to the curb 😄😄😄😄
Edgar Estrada Jr And he’s supposed to give a fuck how¿
Edgar Estrada Jr did you see the monstrosity he hooked up with after acquittal? It was a drugged out meth head. You can’t tell me he wasn’t using drugs too. The FBI raided his house for ecstasy. They don’t raid your home for no reason.
@@pommiebears Ask BreannaTaylor.
Somebody say something about Mark Fuhrman.
EARL PORTER--Fhurman a lying, perjuring, genocidal racist.
@Mickey Farley --The body's were found past midnight,Nicole were still alive.
@cody2167 --OJ were not the first person he framed.
his use of the n word was not relevant to the trial. should have never been allowed, ridiculous
@@michaelkirkpatrick7483 He just didn't use the N word. This is someone who has said if he saw an interracial couple, he would make up something to stop them if there was no reason. Someone who is genocidal.
F. Lee Bailey was a lousy attorney. Except for O.J., his famous clients lost their cases. Sam Shepard & Patty Hearst both went to jail. Shepard later had his guilty verdict overturned, but Bailey had long since moved on.
Ray Davison
In Sam Shepard’s first trial, he was represented by William Corrigan, not F. Lee Bailey.
Bailey took over as Shepard’s attorney after Corrigan died,and later won his release.
@@bigdaddycool4242 : Thanks. I should have looked that up before I commented.
Lol they maid a movie about Shepard. Bailey definitely got him off. And patty hurst obviously went to jail. But she didn’t get death penalty, that was the win for bailey with hurst
ANYONE PLEASE ANSWER THIS QUESTION...IF IT WAS A FRAME-UP BY THE COPS HOW DID THEY KNOW OJ DIDN'T HAVE AN ALIBI SUCH AS BEING AT A PARTY OR ON A TV SHOW?
@@Dodo-ym8cc Nah.
dave
There was no EDTA in any samples. That was proven false 24 years ago 🤦♂️ and you’re calling people morons.
dave
Try again slick.
La Times:
Blood on a sock retrieved from O. J Simpson's bedroom and on the gate behind Nicole Brown Simpson's home did not contain a preservative, but only some vague and inconclusive hints of one, a scientist from the Federal Bureau of Investigation testified today at Mr. Simpson's trial.
Defense lawyers called the F.B.I. special agent, Roger Martz, to buttress their claims that corrupt police officers removed the Simpsons' blood from test tubes containing an anti-coagulating substance used in laboratories, EDTA, and sprinkled it on the sock and gate.
DNA tests have all but proved that the blood on the sock was Mrs. Simpson's, and that the blood smeared on the gate matched Mr. Simpson's. But Mr. Martz said there was no proof that the chemical on the two exhibits was EDTA and even if it were, that it was not of the concentration found in preserved blood.
"Everyone is saying that I found EDTA, but I am not saying that," said Mr. Martz, chief of the F.B.I.'s chemistry toxicology unit, with a hint of frustration. "I was asked to determine whether those blood stains came from preserved blood. Those blood stains did not come from preserved blood."
dave
The FBI did reveal the testing parameters. Agent Martz was their witness, and used his own blood,to test whether we all have a chemical similar to EDTA in our blood .
Guess what ? We do. The compound (measured in ppm)that looked like EDTA in the samples from the gate and the sock, matched Agent Martz’s sample levels, proving that we all have a little of it in our systems.
Key point, none of the samples were at a level showing it came from a sample vial.
If you’d read anything on this case , which I’m going to assume you have, you’d know that once OJs sample was collected, sealed in a vial, placed in an envelope and sealed again, it had to have a chain of custody reference number. Philip Vanatter couldn’t assign that number himself, he had to give it to the criminalist Dennis Fung who was actually collecting the evidence, and noting reference numbers and order of evidence found.
Where was Dennis Fung? He was at OJs , so Vanatter delivered the sample to Fung there, roughly 2 hours after it was taken as they were finishing up.
What does this mean? This means that Simpson’s sample had already been noted, photographed and collected from both scenes,before OJs sample was taken or even delivered to Fung.
Everything in life isn’t a conspiracy theory. Fact is...all of the blood collected other than the victims was OJs to a ratio of like 1in 21 billion,that it was anyone other than him.
Another fact...the defense didn’t deny that any of that blood was OJs. Their theory was it was planted. When you look at the timeline,it’s easy to see the planting theory is impossible.
The evidence isn’t made up, fabricated or planted. It all points to OJ.
The blood evidence.
The fiber evidence.
No alibi
Story kept changing
He had the motive
He had the time
Suicide note
Bronco chase
Providing details of how he might have committed the crime (in a book). Who the hell does that?
Does an interview describing how he would have done it...making statements like “I remember grabbing the knife “
“I remember this guy getting into a karate stance”
There are guys on death row right now convicted on one percent of the evidence that was collected in this case.
Again, everything isn’t a conspiracy.
Maybe read:
Murder in Brentwood
Without a doubt
dave
You like jumping around on topics don’t you?
Lol, doesn’t change the facts I listed.
His blood at the murder scene, mixed with victims in his vehicle and on a glove. No one denies it. It’s proven to be his and his blood and the victims blood are in places they should not be.
No one has said there were cuts on the gloves. Theory has always been that the left glove was pulled off due the struggle with Ron.
I’ve seen the evidence photos of those gloves up close.No cuts, but they sure were messed up around the areas of the palm.
Another big point you seriously seem to be missing. Your statements about no one seeing cuts on his hand goes out the window when he states in his police interview on June 13th,1994....that he cut himself and was bleeding BEFORE going to Chicago.
That was his explanation as to why his blood was in the Bronco, trailing up his driveway and in his house. So, if he’s admitted he’s bleeding (coincidentally on the night and time his ex wife was murdered two miles away)at his home,why would anyone need to plant blood at his home?
Why every think nicol was da target I believe Ron was follow oj is not a murderer only a heartless murderer would leave da mother of da kids slaughter left outside beside whoever killed Ron an Nicole did not knows kids were n that house
The only bit they missed out is Rosa Lopez because she was a defence witness who was Oj Simpson's maid at the night of the murders who saw the bronco at 10:05 pm and turned out to be a liar.
And yet she wasn't prosecuted for perjury, but Mark Fuhrman was, regarding totally irrelevant stuff. Loads of other defence witnesses lied or gave false testimony too, like Sylvia Guerra, Lenore Walker, Henry Lee and John Gerdes.
Wrong,when Park arrived he saw a lady walking a dog,that was Rosa Lopez,10.15-10.30.
@@philipwilliams1754 So why did she give two different testimonies and then say she didn't remember when? Why did she later admit she was paid to lie?
@@TDKiller415 Post the testimony, where she lied and whom paid her.
@@philipwilliams1754 Its on Wikipedia and there is a source, I'm not your research machine. If the sources were not reliable, it would've have been taken down. She said she and Sylvia Guerra were each offered $5,000 to lie for Simpson.
The socks had identical blood stains on both sides. Only 2 ways that happens. Oj had a hole in his ankle or it was placed on an unworn sock. Edta was just on the blood. Not on the entire sock. Not saying oj was innocent or guilty. But it's obvious that evidence was planted.
flunder50
Testimony from the FBI...DNA tests have all but proved that the blood on the sock was Mrs. Simpson's, and that the blood smeared on the gate matched Mr. Simpson's. But Mr. Martz said there was no proof that the chemical on the two exhibits was EDTA and even if it were, that it was not of the concentration found in preserved blood.
Everyone is saying that I found EDTA, but I am not saying that," said Mr. Martz, chief of the F.B.I.'s chemistry toxicology unit, with a hint of frustration. "I was asked to determine whether those blood stains came from preserved blood. Those blood stains did not come from preserved blood."
If the blood on the socks was still wet,when they were taken off it would have bled through from one side to the other.
@@bigdaddycool4242
Blood dries fast, there's no way it'll bleed through and make a mirror image unless it was planted. And there was EDTA in the blood on both the socks and the gate.
@@bigdaddycool4242 Explain ,the socks were in a fight,in dirt.No blood on the carpet or trace.
@@bigdaddycool4242 The blood on the Bundy back gate explain.
@@bigdaddycool4242 🤡
Ron was the intended victim,he was attacked first on Dorothy.
@@Iammricoflly ---Finally after the trial was over and Jury deliberations had begun,Clark turned over ''Contact prints'' of the crime scene.Scheck motioned the court for a hearing.He states he has photos of the crime scene,which shows blood on Andrea Scotts' car and a blood trail leading away.
Philip Williams interesting I’m wondering was it somebody else in the car with him
@@Iammricoflly --Two women testified they saw Andrea Scott running away from the murder scene.Her car and keys were found there.
Philip Williams where did you see or hear that
@@Iammricoflly --Lots of reading,some of this came up during the criminal trial.Imagine this your on trial,my car and keys were found at the murder scene,and no one took a statement from me,my car was not searched and I testified in no trials.Vanatter returned her car and keys the same day.
I’m not understanding why the witnesses are saying words like, he seemed normal, he was fine… they have nothing to compare his actions too. Also, it’s subjective on how they felt about him
Right they do not know what is normal for oj but they should have a sense of what is generally normal or abnormal.
The cut on his hand was a cover story to explain the cut
What?
@@Eyeinthesky7 The odds of that cut on his hand at the same time are extranomical. plus at first he said he dont remember how he cut his hand.
@@randyharris3175 if you're stabbing or slashing the victim how do you get a cut on the back of your hand?
@@Eyeinthesky7 Uh lets see.......if the victim puts up a fight?
Darden should have said with tears in his eyes. I'm going to start a glove factor, and I'm going to make one that does fit....Boowhooo
Why did he flew from the Police and almost commit suicide? I see no explanation for this if he didnt do it
Karlo Carl he also never once during the bronco chase whilst on the phone to Lange say “I’m innocent. LAPD are setting me up. That’s not my blood you found at the crime scene” never once. Instead, he said “I’m the only person who deserves to die. I know you’re just doing your jobs” and if I was innocent,I certainly wouldn’t be saying THAT.
Well DA never introduced that into evidence, so it is irrelevant
He didn't flee.
@@pommiebears He did say that he is innocent on the phone. Also on the suicide letter. Get your facts straight. Dude is 100% innocent. Ojsimpson.co - for all the real facts.
@@Solitude47152 After OJ entered his property ,Lange gave orders to kill him.
Well, he is well into his 70s. The Muther F er does not have tons of time left. So long.
if there is a hell or karma and judgement at death, his nightmare is only beginning.
If you take leather gloves or any leather and soak it in liquid it will shrink. Plus put on a pair of rubber gloves under the leather gloves and they sure wont fit.
malcolm Burns--A lie,Aris Isotoners do not shrink.
Good thing they don't make shoes, jackets, ski gloves or any other article of clothing that regularly comes into contact with liquid out of leather...........
@markmac
Wrong, the person who made that claim is a charlatan liar looking for attention. The prison doctor confirmed that OJ took all his medication.
You believe in his innocence?? Ha please ! You believe in his MONEY!!
It is amazing that all of the contamination turned the blood into OJ's, Nicole's, and Goldman's. Magically.
Oj could not possibly have done it.
@@daviddavis3389 I'd like to believe that, why do you?
I thought with pcr that it’s a comparison so they are testing to see if it’s a match. If oj dna there then it’s a hit. Other dna may be there but they aren’t comparing to that. But this was a long time ago so I may be misremembering. I know this was an issue in the kercher murder and the pcr dna testing they did in that case.
The Dream Team of lawyers worked the butts off for a whole year and O J didn’t pay most of their money 💰, they literally worked for free . I hope they’re hunted for this for the rest of their lives
Hogwash!! He paid them upfront huge sums of money. Witnesses were paid $100k. I don't think anyone was hunted, this is their job and they won. The civil trial lawyer got burnt because the judgement in that case bankrupted OJ.
Why? They're defense lawyers. I'd rather live in a system where occasionally murderers get off than a system where you can't competently defend yourself to the fullest of your abilities. Also, the publicity was worth more than those lawyers could have ever made during that year. It made them all household names. The only one with serious nationwide recognition prior was F. Lee Bailey.
They made more than enough on book deals so I doubt they’re complaining. Literally Tv networks and whole new careers and fame came out of this trial. Oj made lots of people overnight millionaires . It was an entire industry
45:32 😂😂😂😂
Once Fhurman planted the Rockingham glove,it threw the investigation off.Both glove's has blood on the front finger area,none on the back.Blood should've been on the back if you are holding a knife or your fist are clenched, punching,stabbing and slashing.Both glove's has fine dog hair embedded in the blood.Meaning OJ lost both gloves at Bundy,finds one and runs away.Jumps this fence and drops it again.
Philip Williams dog hair from Jason’s dog oj didn’t wear nitcaps Jason did
Philip Williams I think Jason was in pain because they clawed his hand with there nails
@@Iammricoflly there was no forensic evidence linking Jason . The fingerprints do not match O.J. Simpson, anyone in the family, Bundy Neighbors or LAPD staff. There was more than one set of unidentified fingerprints.William Dears theory also falls short as Goldman’s knuckles and boots show contact with a person who suffer trauma such as a black eye, bruises busted lip and or broken bones . Jason was seen present walking around with no physical injuries
Paula B was so beautiful...
The title of the video implies that it will only be 3 seconds long
😂❤️👍
He should use this and Vegas to sue the NFL. He clearly has suffered from the effects of CTE for a long time ....the murders in 94 fit the symptoms of it., so does Vegas......look at Aaron Hernandez and what he did and then look at his brain after the fact....Simpson is still alive, maybe he could make light with treating or diagnosing CTE to living people and help to treat it.
Scott V Aaron was paranoid off that pcp shit 1 dude was so twisted off that shit he cut his own dick off that shit make u do some ridiculous shit Aaron had too much to lose to risk it but he had a history of violence so he can't blame it on cte he just was cray cray
@@spazarellapoet8735 he has been diagnosed with the most advanced case of cte in history.....not saying he didn't do drugs....I'm sure he did....but the cte caused all his changes, paranoia rage all of that can be attributed to cte....I'm sure the drugs only made him worse but you can't say he didn't suffer from CTE, cause he's been diagnosed since his death
It would have been absolutely impossible to plant all that blood in all the places where it was found
No it wouldnt. The defense proved it. LAPD had OJs blood 13 hours after the murders. When they booked the vial 20% was missing the same amount they "found"
Jim Jim how did they plant his blood, found before he was home from Chicago, and before they had taken ANY blood from him? They didn’t have his blood until he got home, yet the blood drops were found much earlier. I suppose you’re going to tell me that they swopped the blood, right? Still can’t find that Lenor Walker testimony anywhere. I have honestly looked.
@@pommiebears Through disgustingly bad forensics. Did you know that the criminologists admitted to spilling OJs blood and he said he didn't remember if he changed gloves afterwards? This was between testing the reference sample from oj and testing drops from the scene.
MEng where is this in the trial? Which criminologist? Do you remember?
Jim jim you are not that stupid you think vanatter a 30 year veteran approaching retirement would plant oj blood and risk everything perhaps even his own freedom for what he had nothing against on he just made a mistake and did not immediately register the blood come on I k ow you're.not that damn stupid you're pulling my leg right
Judge Ito doesn’t sound Japanese. You can’t go based on how someone sounds
He's American of Japanese descent. He speaks like an American, but his ethnicity is Japanese.
@@TDKiller415 You finally got something right.
@@philipwilliams1754 Ah, its Mr N again 😅😅 The racist N who supports a murderer because he's black and the victims were right. The braindead N who believes that all of a sudden, because of that, the LAPD were the new CIA and tried to frame someone. The racist N who pisses on the graves of innocent white people. The sexist N who supports the concept of honour among wife beaters (OJ Simpson and Johnnie Cochran). And the condescending N who will likely go and support Amber Heard when she puts the LAPD on trial so she can win against Johnny Depp.
@@philipwilliams1754 You've got a hundred years to go before you get ANYTHING right, Mr N.
@@TDKiller415 For starters the most incriminating blood was found on the Bundy back gate 3wk's after the murders,after the property was washed down.Laden with EDTA.
Fame can be stolen
Ron Shipp did the killing.
Tim Wood who is that
You can scream racism all you want but that does not explain away the blood at the scene
OJs blood wasnt at the scene.
@@Jim.Jim.32 Yeah, it was
Planted
You said mouth full
White women lives OJ
They're such liars! They know all too well that he is guilty!
You don't know that he's guilty. Barry Scheck made it very clear that evidence was both planted and the forensics people were incompetent. Even if ok was guilty, the evidence of corruption points to an easy not guilty verdict. People who say that they KNOW he's guilty know nothing about the case or they're liars.
MEng
What evidence was planted?
@@bigdaddycool4242 I think the blood on sock and the back gate were planted. Both were found a month later and neither fit. The dna on the back gate was exposed to the elements for a month but had the most dna. The blood on the sock had soaked through to the other side which meant it didn't have a leg in it and it was pressed on. Fwiw, the burden of proof isn't on the defense... But the prosecution had no explanation for these facts.
MEng
Lmao! Say the blood on the gate and the sock was planted...how do you explain all the other blood found at the crime scene that came back to OJ. Or, the blood on the glove at OJs , or OJs blood and the victims blood in the locked Bronco?🤷🏻♂️
You know, all that blood that was noted in police reports, then photographed, and then collected hours before Simpson returned from Chicago to give his sample.
@@bigdaddycool4242 --Watch Dr Robin Cotton,testimony under cross from Peter Neufeld.
Next week they'll be coming coming for us the the redheads
That’s nice but the jury should only be exposed to evidence!!! Not useless family members!!
"Best lawyers money can buy." In other words, a plea bargain lawyer, a civil rights lawyer, an appeal lawyer, a DNA expert whose future goal is to prove INNOCENCE, and a felon of DUI 🤣🤣 And how did they win? By putting the system on trial for racism and unproved lies instead of defendig their client. What a joke 😅😅😅
Putting fuhrman on trial for falsifying evidence and vanatter for lying IS defending their client. And they did so very successfully.
@@andrewdunn49ers They never proved that Fuhrman and Vannatter lied about anything relevant to the case. They fooled Fuhrman into pleading the fifth, thats not the same as admitting to falsifying evidence. When you defend your client, you attack the evidence, for instance what Barry Scheck was trying, even though his arguments were bullshit, but THATS the way to go. Scheck later started the innocence project to attack wrongful convictions and get innocent people off. Introducing race into the trial was not a matter of defending OJ Simpson, it was attacking the LAPD with lies and allegations. That was why judge Hiroshi Fujisaki kept all baseless allegations out of the civil trial and OJ lost. And besides, if Fuhrman and Vannatter had falsified any evidence, SOMEONE would've told on them and they would've gone to the gas chamber. Why would Vannatter, in his 27 year career with no civil complaints whatsoever, suddenly have a change of heart and want to frame OJ Simpson in the first place? Why would Fuhrman exonerate Arrick Harris but then try to frame OJ Simpson? You can't base an argument based on allegations. Cochran and Bailey would have demanded Fuhrman's clothes if they really believed he planted the glove, to see if there was any blood on his clothes, but they didn't, because they knew Fuhrman's clothes were clean and it was a risk they couldn't take, it would discredit the blood planting theory completely.
If this was a widely accepted practice, putting the police on trial whenever there was an arrest, then the police officers who beat Rodney King would have gone to jail. The judge from the Latasha Harlins case would've been disbarred. There would be no legal system left because all the judges, prosecuters and police officers would lose their jobs because of conspiracy allegations 🤣🤣 OJ only won because he was popular and rich, thats it, and the media was on his side all the way
@@TDKiller415 Fuhrman and Vannatter never lied relevant to the case? What case are you talking about? Fuhrman plead guilty to perjury! Which by definition is lying about facts relevant to the case. Vanatter and Lange handling of blood viles was the only time in their long careers they had mishandled protocol personally carrying it around. SHADY. Are you familiar with Dr. Fung’s lies and blunders? Scheck started his project in 1992, before the trial. Get facts man. If you’re a defense lawyer in this case and REFUSE to attack the police on these blatant atrocities, you’re an AWFUL lawyer lol. I’m not even saying OJ was innocent but the lawyers did their job masterfully. To just bypass blatant bigotry, extremely shady blood handling malpractice you wouldn’t be doing the justice system right.
@@andrewdunn49ers exactly LAPD was caught in multiple lies and perjurious statements. The media and courts wanted to give them a pass as they wanted a guilty verdict at all cost. The Civil Trial ignored all of this tampering of evidence and contamination which as blatant just to give the
Public what they wanted.
@@andrewdunn49ers I agree with you 💯%.
How in the hell can Cochran believe in his innocence he was a smart man
Randy Harris smart enough not to care. Only a foolish lawyer cares about guilt or innocence. You don’t make money if you care about that.
he didn't really believe it, but had no problem believing OJ's checks would not bounce
Bro this shit was really a circus lol
They killed Johnny.
Not true! It was induced by Cancer SiR!
Et gll they did there job very well I agree but not good enough to erase all the blood evidence the jury was pre disposed to let him go
what about the CASSONOVA KILLER confession... He confessed to his brother he killed Nicole and Ron
Lisa Berry absolutely no evidence whatsoever to believe he did this. None. He was just like other serial killers....he wanted another feather in his cap. I can guarantee he didn’t do it.
ron said hey hey hey because when he opened the gate one of the navy seals pointed a gun at him and slammed the gate behind him and told him if he talked he would be dead
Blood oath part 6 RUclips explains the murders why it was so quiet
Rico Flyy oh please...your mental gymnastics are tiring.
I believe his son did it but he was there to watch. WHERE THE HELL IS THAT KNIFE? Has to be way out in the pacific.
I'm not defending OJ but no wonder they lost the case, because there was just not enough evidence like I said on previous comments.. She claimed that he was physically abusive and yet she writes a letter saying that she never wanted to leave him??? COME ON!!
Edgar Estrada Jr
There was plenty of evidence in this case.
There was blood, fiber evidence, motive.
Many battered women don’t want to leave their abuser. My guess is , she finally had enough and told him so just weeks before.
Not enough evidence? Lol. His blood on the crime scene, victim's blood on the bronco, bloody glove in his property, victim"s blood on his socks and cut on his hand, history of abuse, bronco esvape, the shoes. I'm sure people are on death row for much less
Rodriguez Thiago
Sadly, you’re right. Some would rather believe a conspiracy than what is staring them right in the face. But hey, they played smoke and mirrors and won🤷🏻♂️
markmac
I agree with you on that timeline. I think he killed Nicole around 10 and then Ron showed up a little after. The dog barking doesn’t necessarily mean that’s when the murders occurred.Then again, maybe it happened just like his hypothetical confession.
I’m trying to remember where I read it, but I read that Nicole, while with OJ had called 911 nine times. Think about that. How many times have any of us called 911? I know I haven’t called that many times in my life ,lol!
I also read that when the prosecution interviewed witnesses, friends and family, they noted something like 60 plus incidents where OJ physically or verbally abused Nicole.
markmac
Yeah man, I grew up in that environment too. Saw so much abuse.
Johnnie c. Is the man and tom m. the dude that got mj acquitted in his last trial the top two lawyers of the past century . R .i.p mr johnnie
Spazarella Poet
Johnny Cochran didn’t represent Michael in his 2003 trial in which he was acquitted, Tom Mesereau was his attorney.
Johnny Cochran was the one who negotiated the $23 million dollar payout in 1993. If you’re innocent, why are you negotiating and paying a settlement?
Edward Van Buren no shit I'm saying johnnie the man for getting oj off in the early 90's when all odds was against them just like tom got mike off in the 2000's I know about the 93 settlement but we see even when given a not guilty verdict people still think they both guilty regardless of facts or fate as it played out.
Spazarella Poet
So, he got a double murderer off and got a pedophile off🤔 Maybe a good attorney, but his methods are questionable and he’s literally no better than the pieces of shit he got off.
Good old Johnny himself was a wife beater.
@@bigdaddycool4242 So you think all black people are guilty i see 🤡
@@ramslife7295
Where did I say that? Nice of you to assume ie “make an ass of yourself”.
That condition dose not bleed lol
💢I was the only Black kid in my school in '94.We buried a time capsule and I wanted to put something inside that represented my people...
We dug it up yesterday!! Along with the Chromes,Magic The Gathering cards,and Ninja Turtles....my 2 photos of OJ Simpson and Bill Cosby.☹
He did it but the state tainted the evidence and couldn’t prove their case. If I was on the jury I would have voted not guilty. This entire case was a joke!
Stacey Shaffer
What evidence was tainted?
Ito did nothing to prevent this circus. He was the one who turned it into a circus. His often passive aggressive approach had undertones of narcissistic behaviour that was obvious. He just loved the attention.
Pommie bears Lucky the Jury made the correct decision.
eric Mays Bahahaha!
he was a total disgrace to the dignity of the bench
My question is...and I'm not defending OJ by any means...abuse is abuse no matter how you slice it...but was Nicole some little innocent lamb in the woods just minding her own business...or was she into some.questionable stuff?
She hung out with very dangerous people and Ron worked undercover to bust drug dealers.
Oj lost the civil trial though and remarked "this is far from over", when pressed to clarify what he meant he said "I'm going to kill more people what do you think I meant?"
lol
The ghost of Norm Macdonald approves
For OJ to comitt that crime in 20 min. And still show up to his house to catch the Limo ride is impossible. 20 minutes go by extremely fast.
Osvaldo Encarnacion
He wasn’t seen from 9:45 til 1054 pm. That’s an hour and nine minutes.Nicole’s condo is 2-3 miles away. Takes 5 minutes to get there. Take out the round trip drive and you’ve got roughly an hour to commit this crime.
@@bigdaddycool4242 Did you watch the video? The prosecutions theory centers as round the barking dog. The witnesses who were outside that night b/w 10:15 - 10:35 all testified to hearing no barking dogs. 2 of those witnesses heard no barking dogs until after 10:35. Allen Park saw OJ standing on his driveway at approximately 10:55. That's 20 minutes so where are you getting an hour from? Plus the partially melted ice cream on the kitchen counter shows that she had to have been alive somewhere close to 11:00. Otherwise it would have been completely melted by the time the bodies were discovered after 12:00. Did you even research before you commented?
bull6599
Did YOU even read my comment? Prosecution theory is exactly that ..a Theory. Just because a dog was heard barking doesn’t mean the murders occurred at that very moment.
And, if you do the math, from 9:40(last time OJ was seen by Kato) til 10:55 (when he was seen by Allen Park)is an hour and fifteen minutes.
Nicole lived 2 miles away. It takes 5-7 minutes to get there, depending on traffic. Take out that 10-14 minutes round trip drive and you’ve got what? Roughly an hour that OJ had to commit the crime.
Also, the last time anyone spoke to Nicole was her mother, and that call ended at 9:42-9:46 pm. I guess in the middle of June no one would possibly have the A/C on in their home potentially keeping the ice cream from melting 🤷🏻♂️
Maybe you should work on your reading comprehension before you comment.
@@bigdaddycool4242 Air conditioning would delay the rate at which it melted, not stop it. It would have to practically be freezing to stop ice cream from melting over a 2 plus hour period. Also Ron Goldman didn't even clock out at Mezzaluna until as round 9:50.
bull6599
So, you’re changing directions now?
Ron Goldman clocked out at 9:35, hung out with another waiter and left at 9:50.
His apartment was like a 5 minute walk away. He drove a friends car to Nicole’s,also 5 minutes away from his apartment. If he left at 9:50, walked home, changed and drove to Nicole’s, that puts him there roughly 10:10-10:15?
He’s so guilty! I lived in Los Angeles and we all called him the “The Butcher of Brentwood” when he’d try and hang out at Starbucks. Luckily he got ran out of town. NO ONE WANTED HIM IN OUR CITY. He’s a monster
Oh stop. The jurors actually saw the evidence while you saw the trial on Geraldo.
Whatever lady, you know you love O.J.
Leave Mr Simpson along please
Accept jury verdict and shut hell up
Haley Watters now you need go Florida run George Zimmerman out
Where is the outrage that a woman documented her abuse by her killer & it was dismissed as hearsay?
It's called rules of evidence, and based on those rules it is hearsay. It seems unfair but that's the rules
This video should be three seconds long
John Sampson absolutely! 👍🏽
this case was a fricken joke ...
jonnybcool Latasha Harling trial was a true joke.
@@daffyduckfan4478 both cases were handled horribly, and theres no justice for either ... but for blacks to jump up for joy when OJ was found not guilty is crazy , he played the black race and made everyone look like fools , OJ wanted nothing to do with the black population ... its very sad that all races cant see what the real problem is and figure out a solution to fix it ...
jonnybcool African Americans were happy that he could go back to his family. It’s a shame that he even had to go through that trial.
@@daffyduckfan4478 amazing that there are dumbasses like you who believe OJ is innocent , GO TRUMP !
@@jonnybcool2000 --Innocent.
*Cochran:* _"This case is not about race..."_
*[Yet uses "Cops framed OJ, because cops have systemic racist issues" as defense]*
*[Then chuckles, accuses and yawns at the prosecution]*
*[10 Years later, undergoes brain surgery]*
*Cochran:* _"I'm feeling well and am in good health"_
*[A year later, dies from a brain tumor]*
As Han Solo said to Luke Skywalker, _"Don't get cocky, kid!"_
Cochran is a King, the fact that you're angry at a guy for doing his job shows your bias and racist personality. You are trash.
I am guessing by your reasoning Nicole and Ron got what was coming to them because bad things happen to 'bad' people.
People are murdered every day do they get this kind of attention?
It’s because the alleged murderer is a famous guy
GO O.J GOO!!!
The evidence against against OJ wasn’t circumstantial, clueless
Circumstantial doesn't mean weak. Most criminals cases are circumstantial. Direct evidence only means witnesses or video.
@@mikeallen5865 thank you for having that comment most Americans are clueless about their own legal system.
Wtf were his family defense witnesses?
Ito was a joke of a judge that disappeared after the verdict.
The jury's verdict is beyond comprehension.
nibsvkh It’s a shame oj had to go thru that trial.
Dan Opyd Lmao that’s what you’d like to think but you just sitting up here saying he’s guilty doesn’t make him guilty
eric Mays
His blood at the murder scene says he’s guilty.
The victims blood, mixed with his in his vehicle, says he’s guilty.
His blood, mixed with the victims on a glove at his house, a glove his ex wife happened to buy for him says he’s guilty.
His ex wife’s blood along with his , on a sock in his bedroom, says he’s guilty.
He might have been found “not guilty” in court, but he’s far from innocent.
@@bigdaddycool4242 The am't of OJs blood found at the crime scenes was the same amt missing from his vial,1.5 cc's.
@@bigdaddycool4242 None of that blood was found on the day of the murders.
The not guilty verdict is simple. It was payback for Rodney King so O.j. should thank Rodney. I dont blame the jury for that because what happened to Rodney was some bs. LAPD needed a change and this was the turning point.
Yeah OK. God forbid you might actually consider that OJ had nothing to do with the murders. You do know his timeline was impossible right?
That’s the mainstream media spin. But if you’ve studied law, you’d see why OJ was acquitted. Not saying OJ isn’t a murderer, just that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt.
@@phxrunner6142 absolutely! The prosecution was terrible in that case. One MAJOR mistake after another.
Paula is gorgeous
I still feel kato was involved in some way ??
The only thing that Kato did was stop OJ from committing the crime sooner. When OJ knocked on Kato's door and said he was going to grab some McDonalds, and that he needed smaller notes to tip the sky cap or something like that, he was using McDonalds as his alibi, he had the bronco all loaded up with the weapon etc, not expecting Kato to invite himself along to go get something to eat also. So he had to go along with it, knowing it was going to put pressure on him to be back from committing the crime much sooner knowing the limo driver was going to be there to collect him at a certain time too. It was noted that it was a little strange that they took his Bentley simply to go get McDonald's drive through but it was surmised that this was because he had a weapon and a spare change of clothes, basically the bronco all loaded up to commit the crime, and hence why he didn't want to take the little "runaround car" on such a small trip on this occasion as he normally would. It should be noted that had Kato not invited himself along then OJ would have made it to Bundy to commit the crime a good 20-30mins before he actually did, therefore Ron would not have been an innocent by stander to the crime, and instead would most likely have been the first person to find her dead. So sad how these things unravel... how 1 decision by another person can effect the next person's life, or in this case, end a person's life.
How anyone with the benefit of 24 years hindsight plus watching this video can still believe OJ Simpson was the killer is not very smart. 20 minutes to kill two people, return home and clean up to meet the limo driver to the airport? CRAZY!!!
If your comment is directed at me then I have to ask you the same rhetorical question. Even Lou Waters opening remarks to this video state accurately the following facts: "No murder weapon, no witness and no clear motive". So I guess people like me still exist because were intelligent even if we exist in smaller numbers than imbeciles like you.
Confession is good for the soul, thank you
DNA of three people were found -2 are dead and the other is OJ, math is pretty simple
100% innocent! He was framed. Check ojsimpson.co for all the real facts!
Heidstra just wanted to be on TV. I doubt most of what he said.
I'm in agreement. Didn't trust his testimony. I watched the entire trial.
oj did it, he got away on bs and the racial tensions of the time