You should read his book about the case. It wasnt published until COVID times strangely enough. He talks about how he doesn't use notes. He also fully belived OJ was innocent which i think is why his cross is truly so good. It's got to be easier defending someone you believe is innocent than defending someone you know is guilty.
Only mediocre people like you will think F lee Bailey is impressive....That dude was a heartless fraud who absolutley knew OJ was guilty....and those questions he was asking Mark Furhman was equivalent too the questions a toddler would ask if they were practicing law.....he was desperately trying to poke holes in a very strong case against OJ.
@@KateMich12 Only mediocre people like you will think F lee Bailey is impressive....That dude was a heartless fraud who absolutley knew OJ was guilty....and those questions he was asking Mark Furhman was equivalent too the questions a toddler would ask if they were practicing law.....he was desperately trying to poke holes in a very strong case against OJ.
whats impressive is these lawyers who would quit and run home crying after 2 hours being a cop, have the gall to stand up there and lecture a first responder in the field about decisions they made on the fly. whoever is impressed by this can thank themselves for why we have so many unmotivated unqualified cops now.
people will sit back in amazement of a true defense lawyer at his finest grill a corrupt cop , yet still think, "oh OJ still did it though'' lol not realizing the amount of evidence that was planted, the fact that ron and nicole both were using cocaine and ron turns out to be a informant for the lapd, and nicole was bringing these elements around her home, 2 knives were used, and there were at least 2 killers, and it wasn't oj, it was linked directly to the lifstyle and dealings of nicole and ron, and by the way , ron goldman, i doubt was at the wrong place at the wrong time and you had the most corrupt police force in us history dispatched to the scene and they framed the shit out of OJ, the media ran with it and bombarded you the pubic through repetition that OJ did it, he didn't
To think that Bailey did not use a single note throughout this entire cross is remarkable. His questions are firing like a machine gun. Just listening to this has me scared. No wonder he's regarded as giving the best cross examinations. This should be played at all law schools.
You have to be completely ignorant about the law to think this was a brilliant cross-examination. None of this should have ever been allowed. And none of it would have been allowed if there was a judge with an ounce of competency or backbone. Forman actually made bailey look stupid if you pay attention to the questions and answers.
@philipwilliams1754 Oooo!... Can you just imagine what would've happened to Fuhrman had he been convicted and sent to county?! Which would've been justice... The State should've had a criminal and civil trial for him, too. Even the Aryan brotherhood inmates would've tee'd off on him.
Yes Bailey was masterful and very deliberate in his dismantling of Furman.. I love how Bailey can always get to the point without really getting to the point..
There’s not much substance to points he makes it’s the manner in which he makes them. If you listen to the detail he repeats and regurgitates a lot making it seem like there’s something “fishy going on”. If the same points were made in a bland manner you wouldn’t bat an eye. It’s all in the delivery not the content. He was by then a seasoned court orator with the rhetoric of Shakespearian actor. To me his delivery is cliched and over dramatic like one of those over the top court dramas on television. x
@@wormsnake1but he still got to the point of exposing the lies that furman told during the preliminary hearing. In this video alone 25:05 - 26:05, you get to hear furman admit that at some point during his time at Bundy, that he was alone near the bodies. That shows that he had opportunity to pick up that 2nd glove, that he would eventually plant at OJs house. Later when asked if he planted or manufactured any evidence in the case, he plead the fifth.
@@deebee9917 Just compare Cochran's cross-examination to Shapiro's. If you're being honest, they're not even close. Link: ruclips.net/video/doKNcYGrwBE/видео.html
@@surpriseimblack Cochran and Shapiro, come on now. Any rational person will tell you that OJ would’ve been convicted without Johnnie. Lee said it himself.
F.Lee Bailey is the best money O.J. Simpson ever spent , without F.Lee Bailey's total destruction of Mark Fuhrman on the wittness stand , O.J. May have got convicted.
44wetwater 44wetwater Unfortunately Bailey didn’t get paid for the job, the Jew Shapiro took $1000,000 from O.J and hired his old friend but didn’t pay him.
The evidence was overwhelming against Simpson, regardless of how well F. Lee Bailey destroyed Fuhrman’s testimony. O.J. was found not guilty because several members of the jury had previous negative interaction(s) with LAPD and believed that the detectives assigned to the case were culpable in the mishandling of evidence, or more to the point, responsible for planting one of the gloves at Simpson’s residence on Rockingham. The LAPD was as much on trial in the O.J. Simpson case as Simpson himself. It wasn’t so much based on the evidence of murder than it was from the ill repute of the LAPD.
why people even now hate the defense team I do not get, they just did their job. and shocking is that Furher Man was the best witness prosecution had the rest were incompetent or stupid. Bailey almost made Fuhrman confess the planting of the evidence
@Stephen Sipek Bailey bragged for weeks about how he was going to bury Fuhrman. After this cross examination Carl Douglas and Johnny Cochran were far from impressed. Sections of media also felt that this cross was rather ordinary. In fact had the Fuhrman tapes not surfaced it would have been wildly recognised that Bailey was living on his past reputation. You will also notice going forward in this case that Bailey's witness load becomes reduced. This is because Simpson and Cochran became annoyed that Bailey did not take notes and made mistakes such as, Colombian necklace as opposed to neck tie. The final straw for Bailey came when he was given William Bodziak, who was the FBI shoe print expert. In this cross examination he proposed that there were two killers and both were wearing size 12 Bruno Magli shoes. That's why Gerald Uelman was given the final task of burying Mark Fuhrmen.
Good points Terry. There is another RUclips clip of Fuhrman/Bailey testimony with attorneys commenting during the breaks.......and pretty much every legal expert agrees (at the time) that Bailey didn't lay a glove on him (no pun intended). Only people who have decided that OJ is innocent or really buy into this pointless fishing expedition believe this Bailey "destroyed" stuff. Had Fuhrman just come clean about his use of language.....all Bailey's thunder would have been for nothing.
I worked in a company in Maine about 10 years ago where Bailey happened to be friends with the CEO, and was on the board of trustees. I used to see him regularly and spoke with him occasionally. A very interesting man and definitely a prima donna.
Alan Rochin You’re right, OJ was there at the scene, but was not the killer, that’s why he escaped without a scratch. However his son Jason is the killer, and that’s why all the DNA evidence points to OJ. They share the same DNA profile.
F Lee Bailey's interrogation of Fuhrman was perfect. Eventually Fuhrman starts to expose himself as being arrogant and very uneducated as concerning of having any higher learning other then his police training. Fuhrman's egotistical attitude is what busted this case wide open and Ms Clark just let it go on. More proof of his; I'm the law attitude. Now Fuhrman has become the suspect in front of the jurors. He's no longer a investigating detective; but a suspect under indictment and the prosecution team just sits there like a spectator in the courtroom. And the public said the defense team was playing the race card. No they just exposed the stupidity of the prosecution's case and the investigators involved.
LOL. You're talking about someone else's education, or lack thereof, while using the word "then" instead of "than"? LOL. Also, it's "AN" investigating detective, not "A" investigating detective. Government run schools strike again. Dude, I wouldn't be calling anyone stupid at this point, and now, years later, it's more than evident that the jury was biased as two have come out publicly and already stated they were. The prosecution lost this case, and the "dream team" didn't do anything more than what a reasonably skilled defense lawyer would do under these same circumstances; let the facts be muddled and create doubt. I don't think I know anyone, or at least not too many people at this point or even back then, DUMB enough, to not see the mountain of evidence, not even counting the DNA part, to think this guy didn't kill them. Then again, there are a LOT of easily fooled people "rooting" for OJ and well, that's that.
@@dyates6380 frist of all a mountain of evidence produced by who? If your talking about evidence planted by Mark Fuhrman and Vannatter and the criminalist Dennis Fung changes the initials on the blood evidence collected. I could see someone like yourself believing the detectives involved in this case. As to the preferred reference to then rather than is referring to the pastence. Its always the same old thing with people like yourself instead of looking at the total picture of the case you only see the jurors 8 blacks and four whites who didn't by into the bull$#!+ that has gotten many a innocent people convicted by falsifying evidence. The prosecution team put on a domestic violence case against OJ Simpson, not a double homicide case. They got caught lying and tampering with the evidence. Your probably one of those people who believe Donald J Trump, "When he said that he won the election, because they cheated him? The question that remains, just like in the Simpson trial, "Is who? But unlike the Simpson case, "We know who he is!
That case showed the power of celebrity, was far more about race that justice, racist jurors that didn't want to accept the mountain of evidence, with others to dumb to understand the evidence, all leading to a brutal psychopath killer walking free, but eventually got years behind bars!
There is quite literally not a "case hidden" since Epstein did not get formally convicted or face trial since he died in jail awaiting proceedings. There was no trial to film. The charges he was facing are publicly available its really not that hard to find what he he was being accused of. Also, Oj Simpson was facing State charges in California where it is not uncommon for a court to allow cameras in a trials with public figures. Epstein was facing Federal charges (i know you didnt bother to actually read the indictment, which is also publicly available, but if you had you would see from the title alone that he was accused of Federal crimes) which means there are far stricter rules that the courts enforce in regards to cameras and publicizing of proceedings. But im sure its easier to believe in conspiracy theories since it doesnt require any actual knowledge or research.
This cross examination puts me to sleep with an ASMR effect. F Lee Bailey is brilliant, a master of his craft. He will not give Furman an inch and follows his statements to the end of logic. It’s like Bailey is steering Furman into a corner. Furman is despicable, of course but he also handles himself extremely well in the courtroom so an interesting dynamic at work here.
what is sad is that none of them atoned for their sins. OJ did not atone for his sins as a husband as a wife beater. maybe he was not a killer but he was a failure as father. Fuhrman maybe did not plant any evidence, but he was a racist police officer in actions not only thoughts. he did not atone for his abuse of the police badge after that. at least OJ went to prison for the Las Vegas scandal, Fuhrman did nothing to clean his past.
@@roc7880 OJ is a killer, he’s a murderer and always will be. Fuhrman was a racist jerk but he shouldn’t be conflated with Simpson. My point here is that the cross examination is bizarrely calming. It’s weird, I put this on and it puts me to sleep. Idk why
@@MC-vh7go I am not sure if OJ did the murders the DNA evidence does not add up. I can talk about it for hours. someone is guilty of murder if found as such by a jury. if you think the verdict was not correct blame the cops the forensics and the prosecutors who were beyond incompetence. maybe the testimony is soothing for you because your conscience knows otherwise
@@roc7880 the DNA does not add up? From crimemuseum.org It is reported that the DNA evidence showed that the chance that some of the blood found near the bodies came from anyone but Simpson was 1 in 170 million. The chance that blood found on Simpson’s sock could be from someone other than Nicole Brown was 1 in 21 billion. Blood samples found inside of Simpson’s Bronco, which was discovered outside Simpson’s home the next day, were equally matched to Simpson and both victims. So you have Simpson’s DNA at the crime scene, his blood and Nicole’s DNA match on Simpson’s socks in his home. The DNA certainly added up.we’re talking 1 chance in 170 million here.
@@MC-vh7go dude, the DNA was OJ's. What does not make sense is how 2 mls of blood from the vial was missing, how the blood from OJ had EDTA, the presence of blood spots days after the murder, and many other things.
🕵🏽♂️Its question after question after question ; one after another. Definitely takes patience in being a cross-examination lawyer..and a bit of forward-thinking mental chess in drawing inferences, mentally steering the jury's thought process (applying right brain logic) all whilst capitalizing on emotional feelings (left brain connotations) of human analytics and sentiments. The cadence quick speed of some questions (usually truth comes faster than a few seconds pause for a lie) is intentional.
bailey: "do u know the color of a smurf Mr. Fuhrman" "I don't know what you mean sir" "Isn't it part of your training detective Fuhrman" "well it depends if we watch cartoons in the morning at the station" "that is NOT what I asked, Mr. Fuhrman" "whats the question again sir" "what COLOR IS A SMURF???!" "I have not investigated that, sir. I couldn't speculate" "Isn't it true you have made racial slurs about smurfs in the past" "no sir I have never"
@@ralphjames151 naw you just don't understand it...go watch a vince vaugn film like wedding crashers which is what someone like u would consider humour that you understand. leave things like this for the adults who can actually think. go play
Slopy forensic work too. Dennis Fung should have gotten fired for his incompetence. The LAPD SHOULD have known that this Murder case was going to be High Profile. The LAPD should have assigned their very best people to this case.
@@archangelvvv Impossible for him to have planted it. Fourteen uniform officers arrived at the murder scene prior to Fuhrman and they all stated they only saw one glove. Most of them didn't even know and had never heard of Fuhrman. To believe that Fuhrman planted the glove you would have to believe that more than a dozen officers were either all mistaken on this issue or they all lied. Each one is equally preposterous.
yes and the defense tried to get a new judge and they almost did. Incidentally, Mark Furhman cursed out Judge Ito's wife years prior. This trial was a SHIT SHOW
Jim Jim no...the defense DID NOT. That’s a big porky pie Jim. The prosecution wanted a new judge. Johnny Cochran said they’d redact the part of the tapes where capt York is mentioned. Marcia wanted a mistrial. Cochran didn’t. I can guide you to the day the arguments happen in regard to this if you wish. You know better than that, Jim.
Furhman running around in dark crime scene during nothing oh change that he going from Bundy to Rockingham planting stuff moving glove to Rockingham and perhaps planting blood too much time doing nothing perhaps telling kateo he give him signal on wall when he finished no way a person's body thump hitting the air condition Durham just happen find the glove and blood on Broncos too many holes can not give time murders happens how can you see a little speak in dark thought he was concern about other ppl bleeding come on now this does not make sense
How did OJ covered in blood with a bleeding finger, and holding a bloody knife only manage to leave one little spec of blood on the outside of a white vehicle and then leave smears of blood on the inside of the bronco?
Well if it was planted wouldn't whoever was doing that just smear more blood around, if you are suggesting it was planted! By the way, did you ever heard of a cloth, towls, cleaning agents, tissues, O yes, forgot OJ with his arthritis hands wasn't able to clean!anything 😅, like now did OJ go to the airport later with all that blood from crime scene on him, I been wondering about that for years, O i forgot, he has a shower in his house😅!
All that blood at the crime scene but almost no blood in the Bronco and he somehow showered and washed all the blood away in 5 minutes but no blood went down the drains... Even if the bloody clothes were in the bag Kardashian took out or the bag OJ wouldn't let Kato touch, he does not get from Bundy to Rockingham without leaving considerable blood behind. And to be able to clean it all up in 5-10 minutes? It's preposterous.
Twenty five years later and this trial hasn't lost its intrigue as to who done it. Out of all the police officers at the crime scene,they elected Fuhrman to escort them to OJs house (based on the notion that he was once at the estate of OJ Simpson), if Fuhrman was supposed to show them the way, then why wasn't he the lead patrol car? Fuhrman was the police Departments wild card they all knew about his background and his capabilities to plant evidence. Under cross examination hes got an explanation for everything except for his response to where you investigating or looking for suspects he's crossed up now he can't remember all his lies and now tape recordings of him saying that he would plant evidence. Forget about a white cop calling a Black Man a N______, that's everyday language to a white cop. If anyone believes that Fuhrman pleaded the fifth because he called a Black Person a N_____ is ether stupid or just not willing to except the truth. A cop pleading the fifth amendment because he called a Black person a N_____, you can't believe that now can you? So that would mean from now on every single white cop would have to plead the fifth in every trial concerning a black person. That's crazy,but that's what happened in this trial the only person found guilty in this shameful case was Mark Fuhrman the white knight of the LA police Department guilty of perjury. For lying about never using the word N______. Unbelievable right, but it happened in 1995 in America.
Watching Bailey's questioning I see the Defense's argument a little more clearly about Fuhrman... I always thought o.k, he's a racist, so they're saying he planted the glove. What Bailey is suggesting is that since we have Fuhrman on tape bragging about how he's the key witness because he found the glove, and that he had said he wants the big arrest... that he had a desire to be involved and while sitting there for two hours waiting on Lange he hatched up the idea to plant the glove. That actually makes a lot of sense. only real problem with that is, you have to believe that all the other cops who had seen both gloves lied about it later.... but many of them knew how Fuhrman was and ignored it so it's possible.
Actually it's the other way around. Fourteen uniform officers arrived at the crime scene prior to Fuhrman and all of them stated they only saw one glove. Most of them did not know and had never heard of Fuhrman. There simply wasn't a second glove there for him to find. You would have to believe that more than a dozen officers were either all mistaken on this issue or they all lied. One is just as preposterous as the other.
@@1981lashlarue regardless, just as unlikely OJ lost a bloody glove at a murder scene then realized he still had on a bloody glove and just tossed it on his property. Then, the guy who discovers the bloody glove is a serial, genocidal liar racist, who pleads the Fifth when asked directly if he planted the glove or fabricated any evidence. Reasonable fucking doubt if ever!!!! Just stop!
@@mugm2 Actually, it is likely, or at least plausible, than Simpson lost the glove at the crime scene while brutally murdering two individuals. Remember, he was only expecting Nicole to be there as Ron wasn't planning on being there. I don't think anyone is suggesting that Simpson "tossed" the glove onto his property as he was returning in haste, late for his limo and nearly missing his flight. He was in a bit of a fluster and it likely fell during the course of his quick return. Murderers and criminals leave behind clues and evidence at crime scenes and their homes all the time so I don't know why that is so unbelievable. The jury never saw or was never informed that Fuhrman took the Fifth so that couldn't be a part of their reasonable doubt. Even if you completely remove the bloody glove as evidence and pretend it never existed, there is still far more than enough evidence to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. When your blood is at the crime scene, that's bad enough but when the victims blood are in your home and car, that's lights out, game over time. There's just no coming back from that.
From the opening statement on january 25th, he did most of the cross examinations during the first few weeks. Including witnesses Det. Riske (feb 9), Det. Philipps (feb 16) and Det. Lange (feb 21 or 22)
Netflix didnt come close especially when Darden was cited for contempt. They dramatized it to the max to impress the people who never watched the original trial.
Yes Mark Fuhrman had used that word over at least 500 plus times all on record and he lied under oath that he have never used that word, if he'll lie about that he'll lie about everything else too apart of that reasonable doubt that the government couldn't prove beyond any reasonable doubt that O.J. Simpson committed those murders
I wonder how stupid is for somebody to commit double murder and forget a glove at the crime scene and one at his house. after that let the car with evidence next to his house and go to Chicago. come back and go for an interview at the police without a lawyer and donating blood without a warrant.
He was in a hurry. There was a fight between OJ and Goldman. He was stressed. He had to go to Chicago, if he hadn't caught that plane OJ knew that they would suspect him and everything would have been different in this case.
How dumb is it to go to a hotel room with lots of witnesses and put a gun in their face to get a bunch of junk back? Criminals are not exactly rocket scientists. That's why the jails are quite full.
Marcia was such a horrible prosecutor she was letting Mark take it in the ass on this one she had so many chances to object to F Lee Bailey questioning but never did that's why Mark threw them under the bus and pleaded the fifth he knew it!!!
@@slabbusterrtr7690he would have just lied to her so it wouldn't have changed anything. He had too much baggage in his past, cops like this are nothing but a liability and all of society has to pay for it
Even though most people think OJ did it. One think that I will never understand is how OJ didn’t have any injuries and bruises after the struggle. It appeared that Coleman had been in an ínstense fight and he had trained in martial arts. How does Oj only get one small cut which can be explained away. Did he get help?
Furman had told his friends watch how I out smart Bailey when I get on the stand. He didn't know Bailey was setting up traps and Furman fell right in 😢
i'm really curious about whether bailey thought of himself as clever, or whether he accepted the fact that his role was simply to annoy and discomfort the hostile witnesses
If you know ahead of time you are going to be able to successfully dismantle someone's credibility it makes your job a lot easier. That's pretty easy to relate to, you don't have to be a lawyer, we've probably all caught people trying to get away with something and we know ahead of time what to look for in their story
At the time referenced, her body had not been officially identified and a good investigator does not assume what they may suspect. Just because Nicole lived at that residence, does not mean the blood soaked female lying dead there is actually her. Body had to be officially identified and was subsequently.
@@amann399 technically you are right. But in real life, he knew who it was. Just like technically his job as an officer was to protect and serve but in reality he wasn’t always there to protect and serve. My fav Eminem line is “LETS GET DOWN TO BUSINESS, I don’t have time to play around, what is this? MUST BE A CIRCUS IN TOWN, we shoving shit down on these clowns!”
Furmem thought he was so smart ! But when F Lee Bailey ask you if you ever said something over and over again you should know he has the evidence that you did!!
They had to give furhman training sessions on his tenper prior to him testifying. There's also rumors that he was given some oral meds that will keep him composed under pressure.
@@calexander2119 A man such as F.Lee Bailey would have never defended OJ Simpson had he believed that he was guilty. What F. Lee Bailey was able to prove was that there was falsifying evidence against OJ Simpson, he made Mark Fuhrman plead the fifth amendment and it wasn't because he called Black people N!&&@....ers. It's what was recorded in those tapes that were found about what Mark Fuhrman admitted to doing the falsifying of evidence on Black people to arrest them. I get it OJ Simpson committed domestic violence against his wife, but this was a murder case not a domestic violence case. Most people say well what about the blood evidence collected? Collected by whom discovered by who Vannatter and Mark Fuhrman. I respect the views of everyone, but ignorance cannot be ignored .....it was obvious that evidence was being fabricated, why was OJs blood evidence the only blood found with EDTA in it.??? "Nobody else! With the force that was being used to kill Ronald Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson, the assailant would have cut his finger off, not some little zigzag little cut. My problem was why did criminalist Dennis Fung changes the initials on the blood evidence collected at both crime scenes after receiving OJs blood sample from Vannatter? There are things that you just can't overlook. Just listen to the closing arguments by the defense and the prosecution. That's the entire case, no way were they going to get a conviction on a weak closing argument that the State was representing the people. They spent half the case defending the police....not Nicole and Ron.....
Well he was coached and practiced this with the prosecution, as they knew it was coming. I think they even mention he spoke to psychiatrist about his testimony prior to taking the stand. It’s freaking great later on when he pleads the fifth after being asked about planting evidence or saying the N word.
I agree. I always believed the media about Furman in this case but I recently read the book Furman wrote and he was made the scapegoat in my opinion. He was advised to take the 5th. Idk. Who knows but I find it all very interesting
Shapiro appeared to be ignorant and narcissist throughout the case. I think he may have felt Krochran and Bailey out shined him. I don't believe he really believed OJ was innocent....he knew this case had the potential to boast his career.
Gennifer Pace He wanted OJ to take a plea deal early on and also Robert Kardashian as an accessory... Kardashian talks about it in his interview with Barbra Walters
Face the facts that the lapd didnt have a case against him and tried to get evidence against him and that his why they did such a sloppy job and coṅtaminated the crime scene
You can see OJ face feel like crying and horrified after his defence lawyer mention Nicole's throat was cut completely but he tried his very best not to show it!!! So sad!
sweetadvice3 He has no remorse. Sociopaths don't feel guilt, remorse or empathy. He can't even remember the date of his little baby daughter's death by drowning in his swimmimg pool. What parent doesn't have that date etched in his mind for the rest of his life? Yet he said in an interview that he can't remember when she died. She was just a child.
Bailey doesn’t even use notes he’s so good. Wow this is impressive.
You should read his book about the case. It wasnt published until COVID times strangely enough. He talks about how he doesn't use notes. He also fully belived OJ was innocent which i think is why his cross is truly so good. It's got to be easier defending someone you believe is innocent than defending someone you know is guilty.
Only mediocre people like you will think F lee Bailey is impressive....That dude was a heartless fraud who absolutley knew OJ was guilty....and those questions he was asking Mark Furhman was equivalent too the questions a toddler would ask if they were practicing law.....he was desperately trying to poke holes in a very strong case against OJ.
@@KateMich12 Only mediocre people like you will think F lee Bailey is impressive....That dude was a heartless fraud who absolutley knew OJ was guilty....and those questions he was asking Mark Furhman was equivalent too the questions a toddler would ask if they were practicing law.....he was desperately trying to poke holes in a very strong case against OJ.
@@KateMich12 Perhaps, but I also think it depends on the attorney who is defending , their personality and style....
whats impressive is these lawyers who would quit and run home crying after 2 hours being a cop, have the gall to stand up there and lecture a first responder in the field about decisions they made on the fly. whoever is impressed by this can thank themselves for why we have so many unmotivated unqualified cops now.
when he calls him by name, "Detective Furhman" you know he's got him by the balls lol
F Lee Bailey must be a good fisherman he really lured Furball in hook line and sinker.
I love watching these videos. RIP F Lee Bailey.
📌📌 Wow F L Bailey is deceased too!! Is anyone on the defense side still alive?!
@@tracyannesat this point, is anyone alive from either side
@@tracyannes yes barry sheck, and carl douglas... vannatter passed away a few years ago.
@@joygully2632 yes marcia clark and chris darden
@@OneWayJesus777-x2n Oh ok...thanks!
This guy is just proving on the stand why he has no right to even be a detective
Barely reads.
Nothing like witnessing Johnny watch Bailey in admiration as he cross examines. Both seasoned professionals in the art of examinations. Such mastery!!
Shapiro is no slouch.
That scene must have been on the movie for I don't see this great aw of Bailey by Cochran that you speak of.
@@glenneubanks3080
Apparently 37 people gave me a thumbs up, which can only conclude that your not very perceptive.
@@glock269mil2 , you are a real-cuck
people will sit back in amazement of a true defense lawyer at his finest grill a corrupt cop , yet still think, "oh OJ still did it though'' lol not realizing the amount of evidence that was planted, the fact that ron and nicole both were using cocaine and ron turns out to be a informant for the lapd, and nicole was bringing these elements around her home, 2 knives were used, and there were at least 2 killers, and it wasn't oj, it was linked directly to the lifstyle and dealings of nicole and ron, and by the way , ron goldman, i doubt was at the wrong place at the wrong time and you had the most corrupt police force in us history dispatched to the scene and they framed the shit out of OJ, the media ran with it and bombarded you the pubic through repetition that OJ did it, he didn't
RIP F. Lee Bailey
He lives on through the work of Darrell Brooks
@@77-ty7gbhe’s God mad racist?
F. Lee Bailey's unimitable techniques will be taught to students of Law Practice for centuries. He was the Master.
@@QuaideAzamPakistanlol
To think that Bailey did not use a single note throughout this entire cross is remarkable. His questions are firing like a machine gun. Just listening to this has me scared. No wonder he's regarded as giving the best cross examinations. This should be played at all law schools.
F Lee Bailey I love his deliverance his tone the way he thunders away on Fhurman. He’s a freaking genius!!!🤗❤️
Tenisha Robinson he was disbarred and his career ended is disgrace. He’s a blowhard jackass.
Bailey sucks and he's a joke and no longer can practice law and is so old he has one leg in the grave. fuck him and the defense smucks
sweetadvice3 he might of been bad, but def. pinned fhurnan down and made him uncredited
thats the marine 'i love this man
You have to be completely ignorant about the law to think this was a brilliant cross-examination. None of this should have ever been allowed. And none of it would have been allowed if there was a judge with an ounce of competency or backbone. Forman actually made bailey look stupid if you pay attention to the questions and answers.
28:05 Some of the best stuff is that Bailey continuously mocks the size of Fuhrman's Little Flashlight
what size of shoes does furmah wear? I wonder? since he lying about alot of things on the stand
@@OneWayJesus777-x2n He never turned his shoe in.
@philipwilliams1754
Oooo!...
Can you just imagine what would've happened to Fuhrman had he been convicted and sent to county?!
Which would've been justice...
The State should've had a criminal and civil trial for him, too.
Even the Aryan brotherhood inmates would've tee'd off on him.
@@philipwilliams1754 oh wow
@@philipwilliams1754 thank you phillip let us know more about this case.
Yes Bailey was masterful and very deliberate in his dismantling of Furman.. I love how Bailey can always get to the point without really getting to the point..
There’s not much substance to points he makes it’s the manner in which he makes them. If you listen to the detail he repeats and regurgitates a lot making it seem like there’s something “fishy going on”. If the same points were made in a bland manner you wouldn’t bat an eye. It’s all in the delivery not the content. He was by then a seasoned court orator with the rhetoric of Shakespearian actor. To me his delivery is cliched and over dramatic like one of those over the top court dramas on television. x
@@wormsnake1oh but you racists are MAD AF😍😍😍😍 he was masterful and WHITE helping the BLACK MAN with his MIXED KIDS and INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE 🌹🥹🥹
@@wormsnake1but he still got to the point of exposing the lies that furman told during the preliminary hearing. In this video alone 25:05 - 26:05, you get to hear furman admit that at some point during his time at Bundy, that he was alone near the bodies. That shows that he had opportunity to pick up that 2nd glove, that he would eventually plant at OJs house. Later when asked if he planted or manufactured any evidence in the case, he plead the fifth.
people take notice this is a legend cross examining this witness
1: Shapiro
2: Bailey
And those two are (objectively) the best in the world.
@@surpriseimblack i like shapiro but wouldn’t put him in front of Cochran
@@deebee9917
Just compare Cochran's cross-examination to Shapiro's. If you're being honest, they're not even close.
Link:
ruclips.net/video/doKNcYGrwBE/видео.html
RIP F. Lee Bailey
@@surpriseimblack Cochran and Shapiro, come on now. Any rational person will tell you that OJ would’ve been convicted without Johnnie. Lee said it himself.
Almost died when Bailey called Furballs flashlight as: "your itty bitty flashlight". OUCH!
😂😂😭😭😭 i was looking for this comment
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
The jury could have seen that the defense was attacking the police instead of defending against the evidence
“Does the name Kathleen Belle, ring a bell? Detective Furhman..” F. Lee Bailey’s best line in this cross examination. Priceless!!
😁
You ever do dirty things with a black man?
lol furhman used it in part 3 already and got a bunch of laughs
@@gudiustouche
@@gudius) 1:01:11
I love watching these videos
21:49 Bailey: “Oh 😯”.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
hilarious.
F.Lee Bailey is the best money O.J. Simpson ever spent , without F.Lee Bailey's total destruction of Mark Fuhrman on the wittness stand , O.J. May have got convicted.
44wetwater 44wetwater
Unfortunately Bailey didn’t get paid for the job, the Jew Shapiro took $1000,000 from O.J and hired his old friend but didn’t pay him.
Lol he was not paid haha
He was paid but less than Shapiro
The evidence was overwhelming against Simpson, regardless of how well F. Lee Bailey destroyed Fuhrman’s testimony. O.J. was found not guilty because several members of the jury had previous negative interaction(s) with LAPD and believed that the detectives assigned to the case were culpable in the mishandling of evidence, or more to the point, responsible for planting one of the gloves at Simpson’s residence on Rockingham. The LAPD was as much on trial in the O.J. Simpson case as Simpson himself. It wasn’t so much based on the evidence of murder than it was from the ill repute of the LAPD.
why people even now hate the defense team I do not get, they just did their job. and shocking is that Furher Man was the best witness prosecution had the rest were incompetent or stupid. Bailey almost made Fuhrman confess the planting of the evidence
At 37:49 judge Ito is looking at this fool like "what a freakin liar👀🥸🤦♂️
F Lee Bailey is the best I have ever heard or ever will at cross examination he has a brilliant legal mind 👍
Facts
Wasn't it hilarious when he got disbarred?
BH was it ??
Trap after trap after trap....
And his voice is very attentive of a voice. You pay attention to him. He is shark.
@@flashpointblank4914 true
There were photos in the doorway , clearly this man is lying...
lied 100+ times, he's a cop...nobody is surprised.
By Part 4 of Furman's testimony that his nose appeared to grow in length?
It did!! Looked like it grew a foot longer LOL
Yes
How bout a couple of gloves Detective?!?!?
RIP Johnnie and F Lee Bailey
There is nothing like watching F. Lee Bailey work his magic. Brilliance in action!
Stephen Sipek you obviously have not watched Juan Martinez cross examine Jodi Arias.
@Stephen Sipek Bailey bragged for weeks about how he was going to bury Fuhrman. After this cross examination Carl Douglas and Johnny Cochran were far from impressed. Sections of media also felt that this cross was rather ordinary.
In fact had the Fuhrman tapes not surfaced it would have been wildly recognised that Bailey was living on his past reputation.
You will also notice going forward in this case that Bailey's witness load becomes reduced. This is because Simpson and Cochran became annoyed that Bailey did not take notes and made mistakes such as, Colombian necklace as opposed to neck tie.
The final straw for Bailey came when he was given William Bodziak, who was the FBI shoe print expert. In this cross examination he proposed that there were two killers and both were wearing size 12 Bruno Magli shoes.
That's why Gerald Uelman was given the final task of burying Mark Fuhrmen.
Terry Leddra wow that’s detail
Blue Line Tactical Solutions u confusing one thing for the other ‼️his work is second to none who r u to judge asshole?
Good points Terry. There is another RUclips clip of Fuhrman/Bailey testimony with attorneys commenting during the breaks.......and pretty much every legal expert agrees (at the time) that Bailey didn't lay a glove on him (no pun intended). Only people who have decided that OJ is innocent or really buy into this pointless fishing expedition believe this Bailey "destroyed" stuff. Had Fuhrman just come clean about his use of language.....all Bailey's thunder would have been for nothing.
I worked in a company in Maine about 10 years ago where Bailey happened to be friends with the CEO, and was on the board of trustees. I used to see him regularly and spoke with him occasionally. A very interesting man and definitely a prima donna.
Was he with his “partner”? Bf?
How ok murdered 2 people a man a woman without a scratch on his face is a mystery
Exactly!
Alan Rochin-No mystery ,he simply didn't do it.
Alan Rochin
You’re right, OJ was there at the scene, but was not the killer, that’s why he escaped without a scratch. However his son Jason is the killer, and that’s why all the DNA evidence points to OJ. They share the same DNA profile.
Yes he did Jason killed Nicole simpson and Ron Goldman he killed them
@@RG-5834 Jason simpson killed Nicole simpson Ron Goldman
F Lee Bailey's interrogation of Fuhrman was perfect.
Eventually Fuhrman starts to expose himself as being arrogant and very uneducated as concerning of having any higher learning other then his police training.
Fuhrman's egotistical attitude is what busted this case wide open and Ms Clark just let it go on. More proof of his; I'm the law attitude. Now Fuhrman has become the suspect in front of the jurors. He's no longer a investigating detective; but a suspect under indictment and the prosecution team just sits there like a spectator in the courtroom. And the public said the defense team was playing the race card. No they just exposed the stupidity of the prosecution's case and the investigators involved.
Agree
Right!
LOL. You're talking about someone else's education, or lack thereof, while using the word "then" instead of "than"? LOL. Also, it's "AN" investigating detective, not "A" investigating detective. Government run schools strike again. Dude, I wouldn't be calling anyone stupid at this point, and now, years later, it's more than evident that the jury was biased as two have come out publicly and already stated they were. The prosecution lost this case, and the "dream team" didn't do anything more than what a reasonably skilled defense lawyer would do under these same circumstances; let the facts be muddled and create doubt. I don't think I know anyone, or at least not too many people at this point or even back then, DUMB enough, to not see the mountain of evidence, not even counting the DNA part, to think this guy didn't kill them. Then again, there are a LOT of easily fooled people "rooting" for OJ and well, that's that.
@@dyates6380 frist of all a mountain of evidence produced by who? If your talking about evidence planted by Mark Fuhrman and Vannatter and the criminalist Dennis Fung changes the initials on the blood evidence collected. I could see someone like yourself believing the detectives involved in this case. As to the preferred reference to then rather than is referring to the pastence.
Its always the same old thing with people like yourself instead of looking at the total picture of the case you only see the jurors 8 blacks and four whites who didn't by into the bull$#!+ that has gotten many a innocent people convicted by falsifying evidence. The prosecution team put on a domestic violence case against OJ Simpson, not a double homicide case. They got caught lying and tampering with the evidence. Your probably one of those people who believe Donald J Trump, "When he said that he won the election, because they cheated him? The question that remains, just like in the Simpson trial, "Is who?
But unlike the Simpson case, "We know who he is!
That case showed the power of celebrity, was far more about race that justice, racist jurors that didn't want to accept the mountain of evidence, with others to dumb to understand the evidence, all leading to a brutal psychopath killer walking free, but eventually got years behind bars!
F.Lee Bailey was in a league of his own.
How about a couple of gloves detective? Come on, Baileys shear genius. No lawyer presents as well on cross examination as him no one.
Totally agree!!
Eric Walker Juan Martinez. He makes Bailey look like an amateur.
Eric Walker-Proof there were no gloves.
Bailey is one of the best of all time
@@Twp205 he said no I saw one gloves
A Colombia necklace which would cut the main artery would have firehosed blood all over Oj, but we have droplets all over
RIP F LEE BAILEY.
why was this televized like it was avatar part 3 meanwhile epstein case hidden?
Tiny hats that's why
@@HLZBORO738 bingo
There is quite literally not a "case hidden" since Epstein did not get formally convicted or face trial since he died in jail awaiting proceedings. There was no trial to film. The charges he was facing are publicly available its really not that hard to find what he he was being accused of. Also, Oj Simpson was facing State charges in California where it is not uncommon for a court to allow cameras in a trials with public figures. Epstein was facing Federal charges (i know you didnt bother to actually read the indictment, which is also publicly available, but if you had you would see from the title alone that he was accused of Federal crimes) which means there are far stricter rules that the courts enforce in regards to cameras and publicizing of proceedings. But im sure its easier to believe in conspiracy theories since it doesnt require any actual knowledge or research.
This cross examination puts me to sleep with an ASMR effect. F Lee Bailey is brilliant, a master of his craft. He will not give Furman an inch and follows his statements to the end of logic. It’s like Bailey is steering Furman into a corner. Furman is despicable, of course but he also handles himself extremely well in the courtroom so an interesting dynamic at work here.
what is sad is that none of them atoned for their sins. OJ did not atone for his sins as a husband as a wife beater. maybe he was not a killer but he was a failure as father. Fuhrman maybe did not plant any evidence, but he was a racist police officer in actions not only thoughts. he did not atone for his abuse of the police badge after that. at least OJ went to prison for the Las Vegas scandal, Fuhrman did nothing to clean his past.
@@roc7880 OJ is a killer, he’s a murderer and always will be. Fuhrman was a racist jerk but he shouldn’t be conflated with Simpson. My point here is that the cross examination is bizarrely calming. It’s weird, I put this on and it puts me to sleep. Idk why
@@MC-vh7go I am not sure if OJ did the murders the DNA evidence does not add up. I can talk about it for hours. someone is guilty of murder if found as such by a jury. if you think the verdict was not correct blame the cops the forensics and the prosecutors who were beyond incompetence. maybe the testimony is soothing for you because your conscience knows otherwise
@@roc7880 the DNA does not add up?
From crimemuseum.org
It is reported that the DNA evidence showed that the chance that some of the blood found near the bodies came from anyone but Simpson was 1 in 170 million. The chance that blood found on Simpson’s sock could be from someone other than Nicole Brown was 1 in 21 billion. Blood samples found inside of Simpson’s Bronco, which was discovered outside Simpson’s home the next day, were equally matched to Simpson and both victims.
So you have Simpson’s DNA at the crime scene, his blood and Nicole’s DNA match on Simpson’s socks in his home. The DNA certainly added up.we’re talking 1 chance in 170 million here.
@@MC-vh7go dude, the DNA was OJ's. What does not make sense is how 2 mls of blood from the vial was missing, how the blood from OJ had EDTA, the presence of blood spots days after the murder, and many other things.
rip mr bailey you was a legend and the best money oj ever spend to save his life
He actually didn’t get his fee from his friend Shapiro and they fell out, so he was the biggest defense score by OJ.
Yea say hello to OJ for us and enjoy the extreme heat
@@DavidMcdonald-df8tb your funny the dead cant hear and i like heat better then cold
@@jeffleishman1553 not quite as funny as your grammar.
@@DavidMcdonald-df8tb oh man you hurt my grammar is that all you got davidmcdonald try better come at me
columbian necklace lol i never heard it put like that till now thanks bailey
Can't wait to see the verdict in this case.
If I was called to the stand...the 1st thing id point out is "Judge Ito is a STAR!"
🤣🤣🤣
Legend had it that on certain nights when the moon is full one can still see the illumination of a tiny flashlight at Rockingham
These are not just cops they’re super cops .. They can spot a spec on a car in the dark
I agree. That was overkill.
🕵🏽♂️Its question after question after question ; one after another. Definitely takes patience in being a cross-examination lawyer..and a bit of forward-thinking mental chess in drawing inferences, mentally steering the jury's thought process (applying right brain logic) all whilst capitalizing on emotional feelings (left brain connotations) of human analytics and sentiments. The cadence quick speed of some questions (usually truth comes faster than a few seconds pause for a lie) is intentional.
Brilliantly analysed.
Who are the 17 people who disliked this video?
jtkbigk77 Bailey haters ‼️
Mark Fuhrman and his 16 alt accounts
bailey: "do u know the color of a smurf Mr. Fuhrman"
"I don't know what you mean sir"
"Isn't it part of your training detective Fuhrman"
"well it depends if we watch cartoons in the morning at the station"
"that is NOT what I asked, Mr. Fuhrman"
"whats the question again sir"
"what COLOR IS A SMURF???!"
"I have not investigated that, sir. I couldn't speculate"
"Isn't it true you have made racial slurs about smurfs in the past"
"no sir I have never"
😂😂
@@tonyak007 :)
Dumb comment
@@ralphjames151 naw you just don't understand it...go watch a vince vaugn film like wedding crashers which is what someone like u would consider humour that you understand. leave things like this for the adults who can actually think. go play
I feel sorry for Marcia and Darden. Chihuahua vs pitbull
F Lee Bailey was something else LOL.
Fuhrman was frozen in his function as a detective of integrity
he was trying to keep a straight face!! lol!!
Sloppy police work.
Slopy forensic work too. Dennis Fung should have gotten fired for his incompetence. The LAPD SHOULD have known that this Murder case was going to be High Profile. The LAPD should have assigned their very best people to this case.
Bailey is the Bomb!
Fhurman testified for 10 hr's and never mentioned a glove.
He couldn't! He's the one that planted it!
@@archangelvvv Impossible for him to have planted it. Fourteen uniform officers arrived at the murder scene prior to Fuhrman and they all stated they only saw one glove. Most of them didn't even know and had never heard of Fuhrman. To believe that Fuhrman planted the glove you would have to believe that more than a dozen officers were either all mistaken on this issue or they all lied. Each one is equally preposterous.
@@1981lashlarue He planted the Rockingham glove,
@@philipwilliams1754 Proof?
@@1981lashlarue Later or tomorrow,I will prove the gloves were planted.
Isnt it a bit of a conflict of interest that Judge's wife is an LAPD Captain ?
yes and the defense tried to get a new judge and they almost did. Incidentally, Mark Furhman cursed out Judge Ito's wife years prior. This trial was a SHIT SHOW
Jim Jim no...the defense DID NOT. That’s a big porky pie Jim. The prosecution wanted a new judge. Johnny Cochran said they’d redact the part of the tapes where capt York is mentioned. Marcia wanted a mistrial. Cochran didn’t. I can guide you to the day the arguments happen in regard to this if you wish. You know better than that, Jim.
Jim Jim August 15th 1995. Johnny Cochran fights to keep Ito on as judge.
Furhman running around in dark crime scene during nothing oh change that he going from Bundy to Rockingham planting stuff moving glove to Rockingham and perhaps planting blood too much time doing nothing perhaps telling kateo he give him signal on wall when he finished no way a person's body thump hitting the air condition Durham just happen find the glove and blood on Broncos too many holes can not give time murders happens how can you see a little speak in dark thought he was concern about other ppl bleeding come on now this does not make sense
Really sound like slip off tongue saw them meaning gloves oh no
45:47 prosecution lawyers thinking , please Fuhrman ….don’t fuck up 😂
How did OJ covered in blood with a bleeding finger, and holding a bloody knife only manage to leave one little spec of blood on the outside of a white vehicle and then leave smears of blood on the inside of the bronco?
I've been saying that for years
Maybe there was lies told what do you think sir
Well if it was planted wouldn't whoever was doing that just smear more blood around, if you are suggesting it was planted!
By the way, did you ever heard of a cloth, towls, cleaning agents, tissues, O yes, forgot OJ with his arthritis hands wasn't able to clean!anything 😅, like now did OJ go to the airport later with all that blood from crime scene on him, I been wondering about that for years, O i forgot, he has a shower in his house😅!
Alot of this case didn't make sense. The prosecution can say all they want to..but there was reasonable doubt.
All that blood at the crime scene but almost no blood in the Bronco and he somehow showered and washed all the blood away in 5 minutes but no blood went down the drains... Even if the bloody clothes were in the bag Kardashian took out or the bag OJ wouldn't let Kato touch, he does not get from Bundy to Rockingham without leaving considerable blood behind. And to be able to clean it all up in 5-10 minutes? It's preposterous.
Twenty five years later and this trial hasn't lost its intrigue as to who done it. Out of all the police officers at the crime scene,they elected Fuhrman to escort them to OJs house (based on the notion that he was once at the estate of OJ Simpson), if Fuhrman was supposed to show them the way, then why wasn't he the lead patrol car? Fuhrman was the police Departments wild card they all knew about his background and his capabilities to plant evidence. Under cross examination hes got an explanation for everything except for his response to where you investigating or looking for suspects he's crossed up now he can't remember all his lies and now tape recordings of him saying that he would plant evidence. Forget about a white cop calling a Black Man a N______, that's everyday language to a white cop. If anyone believes that Fuhrman pleaded the fifth because he called a Black Person a N_____ is ether stupid or just not willing to except the truth. A cop pleading the fifth amendment because he called a Black person a N_____, you can't believe that now can you? So that would mean from now on every single white cop would have to plead the fifth in every trial concerning a black person. That's crazy,but that's what happened in this trial the only person found guilty in this shameful case was Mark Fuhrman the white knight of the LA police Department guilty of perjury. For lying about never using the word N______. Unbelievable right, but it happened in 1995 in America.
Watching Bailey's questioning I see the Defense's argument a little more clearly about Fuhrman... I always thought o.k, he's a racist, so they're saying he planted the glove. What Bailey is suggesting is that since we have Fuhrman on tape bragging about how he's the key witness because he found the glove, and that he had said he wants the big arrest... that he had a desire to be involved and while sitting there for two hours waiting on Lange he hatched up the idea to plant the glove.
That actually makes a lot of sense. only real problem with that is, you have to believe that all the other cops who had seen both gloves lied about it later.... but many of them knew how Fuhrman was and ignored it so it's possible.
Actually it's the other way around. Fourteen uniform officers arrived at the crime scene prior to Fuhrman and all of them stated they only saw one glove. Most of them did not know and had never heard of Fuhrman. There simply wasn't a second glove there for him to find. You would have to believe that more than a dozen officers were either all mistaken on this issue or they all lied. One is just as preposterous as the other.
@@1981lashlarue regardless, just as unlikely OJ lost a bloody glove at a murder scene then realized he still had on a bloody glove and just tossed it on his property. Then, the guy who discovers the bloody glove is a serial, genocidal liar racist, who pleads the Fifth when asked directly if he planted the glove or fabricated any evidence. Reasonable fucking doubt if ever!!!! Just stop!
@@mugm2 Actually, it is likely, or at least plausible, than Simpson lost the glove at the crime scene while brutally murdering two individuals. Remember, he was only expecting Nicole to be there as Ron wasn't planning on being there. I don't think anyone is suggesting that Simpson "tossed" the glove onto his property as he was returning in haste, late for his limo and nearly missing his flight. He was in a bit of a fluster and it likely fell during the course of his quick return.
Murderers and criminals leave behind clues and evidence at crime scenes and their homes all the time so I don't know why that is so unbelievable. The jury never saw or was never informed that Fuhrman took the Fifth so that couldn't be a part of their reasonable doubt.
Even if you completely remove the bloody glove as evidence and pretend it never existed, there is still far more than enough evidence to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. When your blood is at the crime scene, that's bad enough but when the victims blood are in your home and car, that's lights out, game over time. There's just no coming back from that.
Furhman did not plant tge glove idiot
@@1981lashlarueunless someone who has access to both the crime scene and his home put it there. By the way I think OJ did it.
Those lawyers destroyed the racists cops of los Angeles. Kudos
@Gee Did you witness the gruesome murder?! Where were you all this time???
@Gee --OJ killed no one.
@GeeFhurman is a lying ,perjuring ,genocidal racist. The only one convicted in the OJ murder trial.
Furman got pounded
Mr. Johnny couldn't keep his mouth closed on the Netflix series but I haven't heard him speak once yet and I've watched every video so far
From the opening statement on january 25th, he did most of the cross examinations during the first few weeks. Including witnesses Det. Riske (feb 9), Det. Philipps (feb 16) and Det. Lange (feb 21 or 22)
Netflix didnt come close especially when Darden was cited for contempt. They dramatized it to the max to impress the people who never watched the original trial.
You lack knowledge about who J.C. was
Marcia Clark even said the case was given to the defenses they should just thrown the case out. She knew, they had no chance, beating oj.
they knew from the get go that OJ was innocent but they had to have the trial. Darden and clark knew it
What a freakin coward smh
Oj's reaction at 10:00
It brought all the memories back of him doing that to her!
@@willymcpeters2982maybe, or maybe he was disturbed of hearing the gruesome details of his ex-wife.
Tens of thousands of Mark Fuhrmans in uniform to this day. Thats scary.
The thumps on the wall is what im trippin on
Did you use the N word?
Nigga please
Yes Mark Fuhrman had used that word over at least 500 plus times all on record and he lied under oath that he have never used that word, if he'll lie about that he'll lie about everything else too apart of that reasonable doubt that the government couldn't prove beyond any reasonable doubt that O.J. Simpson committed those murders
Rosa Lopez heard him in OJ's yard past 1 am.
FACTS
If OJ thinks the killer is still out there he never thanked Ron for trying to save Nicole’s life
@41:50 furman doesn’t get photographer to take photos of blood on bronco ? Coz there was never any blood on bronco.
Masterclass
I wonder how stupid is for somebody to commit double murder and forget a glove at the crime scene and one at his house. after that let the car with evidence next to his house and go to Chicago. come back and go for an interview at the police without a lawyer and donating blood without a warrant.
He was in a hurry. There was a fight between OJ and Goldman. He was stressed. He had to go to Chicago, if he hadn't caught that plane OJ knew that they would suspect him and everything would have been different in this case.
@@skrudreiveren4243 and let the car with all the evidence next to the house? how dumb is that?
@@roc7880 leaving a glove and a knit hat at the scene. Rage and stress
@@skrudreiveren4243 and one next to your house? com on man
How dumb is it to go to a hotel room with lots of witnesses and put a gun in their face to get a bunch of junk back? Criminals are not exactly rocket scientists. That's why the jails are quite full.
Bailey’s mastery of the English language was impressive!
Furmans testimony is just as credible as Rosa Lopez's... he was a completely different detective in Marcia Clark's direct
Actually he was charged with perjury
Marcia was such a horrible prosecutor she was letting Mark take it in the ass on this one she had so many chances to object to F Lee Bailey questioning but never did that's why Mark threw them under the bus and pleaded the fifth he knew it!!!
Hard to throw another under bus when one buries himself
The detectives messed up the case. Marcia did her best
Yep she dodnt even get with him before to go over stuff he called her she didn't return his phone calls mark said
@@slabbusterrtr7690he would have just lied to her so it wouldn't have changed anything. He had too much baggage in his past, cops like this are nothing but a liability and all of society has to pay for it
furmah said once that if he goes down " we all go down" he knew something" Judge ito knows too
Even though most people think OJ did it.
One think that I will never understand is how OJ didn’t have any injuries and bruises after the struggle. It appeared that Coleman had been in an ínstense fight and he had trained in martial arts. How does Oj only get one small cut which can be explained away. Did he get help?
I think it was a pretty large cut on his hand. A deep slice
That was a professional hit. The way they described Nicole's neck injury sounds like a 2 person job.
OJ had a large penis he used to his advantage, Goldman had a struggle alright.
@@AnaisKarim there were the prints from only one subject on the crime scene. The second was flying?
No. He. Was. Not. Involved. In. Whatever. Happened. At. All.
Furman had told his friends watch how I out smart Bailey when I get on the stand. He didn't know Bailey was setting up traps and Furman fell right in
😢
get him bailey!!
Fascinating even in 2023
I love it wen Ito speaks...I can see why they had a Judge Ito Fan Club and the Leno "Dancing Itos" ...Ito is a star in my book
Ito is so adorable
He’s a groupie
i'm really curious about whether bailey thought of himself as clever, or whether he accepted the fact that his role was simply to annoy and discomfort the hostile witnesses
He won the case so it would seem reasonable that he knew how good he was.
He was there to destroy Fuhrman’s credibility
If you know ahead of time you are going to be able to successfully dismantle someone's credibility it makes your job a lot easier. That's pretty easy to relate to, you don't have to be a lawyer, we've probably all caught people trying to get away with something and we know ahead of time what to look for in their story
Why he trying so hard to pretend he didn’t know that was oj ex wife
At the time referenced, her body had not been officially identified and a good investigator does not assume what they may suspect. Just because Nicole lived at that residence, does not mean the blood soaked female lying dead there is actually her. Body had to be officially identified and was subsequently.
@@amann399 technically you are right. But in real life, he knew who it was. Just like technically his job as an officer was to protect and serve but in reality he wasn’t always there to protect and serve.
My fav Eminem line is
“LETS GET DOWN TO BUSINESS, I don’t have time to play around, what is this? MUST BE A CIRCUS IN TOWN, we shoving shit down on these clowns!”
He didn’t know the Bronco was O.J’s but he need to get over that fence for bodies or suspects
Lmbo...u can tell when Fuhrman is Lyon or uncomfortable...he clears his throat..rhe only thing worse than a liar is a bad liar!!!
He is a lying racist SOB
AND HE DRINK THAT WATER
Mz Kaye i Agree
I don't think Mr. Bailey has mentioned Ron Goldman yet...
Furmem thought he was so smart ! But when F Lee Bailey ask you if you ever said something over and over again you should know he has the evidence that you did!!
EXACTLY !!
I think he was gambling, playing the odds and hoping this would work out better for him. He lost the gamble.
Bailey was easily the best trial lawyer in American history.
Johnny Cochran even Bailey himself said so
You were detecting haha
Fuhrman did it or is affiliated with the killer,
They had to give furhman training sessions on his tenper prior to him testifying. There's also rumors that he was given some oral meds that will keep him composed under pressure.
The only criminal resulting from "The Trial of the Century"
Lol gimme a break
@@BostonsF1nest is silly
Furhman can’t recall wow good work detective
RIP to the King of crossexaminaation. Watching him in court was like watching a very complicated surgery but done with such ease.
Wow I had no idea that he had passed on 8/4/21
RIP F. Lee Bailey. 🙏🏿🇺🇸
You ever go down on a black man ?
F Lee Bailey you were so good... But didn't you feel in your heart of hearts that Simpson was Guilty
@@calexander2119 A man such as F.Lee Bailey would have never defended OJ Simpson had he believed that he was guilty. What F. Lee Bailey was able to prove was that there was falsifying evidence against OJ Simpson, he made Mark Fuhrman plead the fifth amendment and it wasn't because he called Black people N!&&@....ers.
It's what was recorded in those tapes that were found about what Mark Fuhrman admitted to doing the falsifying of evidence on Black people to arrest them.
I get it OJ Simpson committed domestic violence against his wife, but this was a murder case not a domestic violence case. Most people say well what about the blood evidence collected? Collected by whom discovered by who Vannatter and Mark Fuhrman.
I respect the views of everyone, but ignorance cannot be ignored .....it was obvious that evidence was being fabricated, why was OJs blood evidence the only blood found with EDTA in it.??? "Nobody else! With the force that was being used to kill Ronald Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson, the assailant would have cut his finger off, not some little zigzag little cut. My problem was why did criminalist Dennis Fung changes the initials on the blood evidence collected at both crime scenes after receiving OJs blood sample from Vannatter? There are things that you just can't overlook.
Just listen to the closing arguments by the defense and the prosecution. That's the entire case, no way were they going to get a conviction on a weak closing argument that the State was representing the people.
They spent half the case defending the police....not Nicole and Ron.....
@@kennethcharles1386 .. with all due respect if oj didn't kill those people then they are still alive....
Mark voice start cutting off
Fuhrman is incredibly composed and relaxed under this kind of pressure.
Well he was coached and practiced this with the prosecution, as they knew it was coming. I think they even mention he spoke to psychiatrist about his testimony prior to taking the stand. It’s freaking great later on when he pleads the fifth after being asked about planting evidence or saying the N word.
I agree. I always believed the media about Furman in this case but I recently read the book Furman wrote and he was made the scapegoat in my opinion. He was advised to take the 5th. Idk. Who knows but I find it all very interesting
Naughty cop
Kato didn’t know Mr. Simpson was in the house when he help with luggage and watch him drive off
GOAT
Shapiro testified against F..Lee. Bailey in his misconduct trial. I take it that their friendship didn’t survive this case.
Lol the day of the verdict Shapiro said he would never work with him again let alone a few years ago
Shapiro appeared to be ignorant and narcissist throughout the case. I think he may have felt Krochran and Bailey out shined him. I don't believe he really believed OJ was innocent....he knew this case had the potential to boast his career.
Gennifer Pace He wanted OJ to take a plea deal early on and also Robert Kardashian as an accessory... Kardashian talks about it in his interview with Barbra Walters
@@BostonsF1nest What was his problem with Bailey if I may ask,I've never seen a reason printed or spoke anywhere as to why?
Pommie bears They were never friends it was just business Shapiro was the lead defense attorney for O.J. Simpson and formed the Dream Team attorneys
We have a saying in the hood: "Stomp the roach." Bailey stomped the ish out of Mark Vermin.
8:00 - 8:25 😂😂😂😂😂
REMEMBER OJ Simpson was also an Actor.... he played that role to perfection... crocodile tears too...
Face the facts that the lapd didnt have a case against him and tried to get evidence against him and that his why they did such a sloppy job and coṅtaminated the crime scene
Lmfao played a small role in naked gun haha
DETECTIVE FURMAN IS A NO GOOD COP LOL, HE'S A LIAR
You can see OJ face feel like crying and horrified after his defence lawyer mention Nicole's throat was cut completely but he tried his very best not to show it!!! So sad!
With his DNA all over the crime scene.
The piece of shit has to make it look good for the simple minded jury. He killed them and he deserved to ride the lightning.
he killed her and Ron and now has some remorse about it but mainly is putting on an act for the jury and cameras, that fuck is going to hell
sweetadvice3
He has no remorse. Sociopaths don't feel guilt, remorse or empathy. He can't even remember the date of his little baby daughter's death by drowning in his swimmimg pool. What parent doesn't have that date etched in his mind for the rest of his life? Yet he said in an interview that he can't remember when she died. She was just a child.
He’s the one who did it dawg 😂😂😂
LB Will get on you,🙏🧐