I knew 'i' was always a useless prefix since I was using Intel Core 2 duo , then intel suddenly came with Intel core i3, i5 & i7 series, like some Employee told them to copy the Apple company naming schemes. Now the naming goes to the right straight track. Better Late, than Never! Now we can feel own intel's uniqueness with the Intel naming instead of the apple mix naming scheme.
@@LagiohX3 You do realise that the numbers do mean something? There is over a 50FPS difference in games from a 13400 and a 13600K. If Intel named both Intel 5 13th gen then it would cause chaos.
@@mizofpsi9 easy example what about 11600k this is the or the 13100F Or the 10105F or 9350KF Would you easily know which processor is that maybe u and I can do it what about the majority
I’ve never heard of a tech person saying “I have an Intel core i9 13th gen 13900kf” literally all you have to say is 13900kf and it gives you the information that it is 1. an intel processor, 2. a 13th gen, 3. the 900 sku, which is the high end range, 4. unlocked, 5. No integrated graphics. What else do you need to know?
Your first point would be incorrect there is nothing that can tell that its an intel cpu, only reason you can tell its an intel cpu bc its 14gen and ryzen is only on 8th gen, correct way to tell that would be intel is that, intel uses K and F and more. Whilst ryzen has WX, X, G, ETC. Aswell you could tell its intel that sku code is 3 digits long but for ryzen its 2
@itsme_neex8 E - embedded F - no integrated gpu K - Unlocked G - has integrated gpu H - optimized for mobile K - unlocked S - special edition U - power efficent P - laptop cpu
The “i” naming scheme is already simple enough and this is what we’ve been used to ever since the first iteration of these CPU’s. Kinda stupid to change it now.
Looks like they want to emphasize the ultra as it is the top of the line variant and the core is the entry level variant. Not everyone is techie people maybe for some people they cant differentiate it in "i". Maybe that is the case
@@reaperstrife3774o they’re pretty much phasing out the traditional Intel Core i-series processors like how Pentium’s used to be top of the line before being as bottom barrel as the Celerons that used to be built after them
If you work in an industry where you need to keep track of different CPUs that is actually quite important to see the difference between Atom, Core, Xeon, Pentium, Celeron, Xeon Phi, Itanium, Quark and some other ones. For the consumer pretty much non important but keeps the stackup someone sorted
i3,i5,i7, (and now) i9 has been such a simple designation and adding the generation number made sense, with something like 13900K being clearly 13th gen, 9 level, 0 iteration. I think Intel is trying to kiddie things so it’s less clear which is better than the other and adding core and other words is actually lengthy.
You are missing the point, renaming wasnt to drop the 'i' it was so they can sell better binned 'X' processors like AMD does, but they think 'ultra' sounds cool 😂
it's the big problem of our day and age. employees at IT companies need to justify their salary by finding new "innovations". Some of these innovations consists in messing up with things that were working great for everybody.
I personally strongly dislike the intel cpus because they’re confusing and not beginner friendly. During all my research, no site has simply told me the large number beginning denotes the generation until a randomly commenter in this section said something. It is not intuitive
And after this people will be confused between model name and no. of cores in the processor, like Core i9 sounds like a model name but Core 9 will sound like that the processor has 9 cores
I think the "intel 14 14th gen Fourteen series 14 times 100 times 10 Processing computer processor core 8 computer core I9 Nine 14900K hyper ultra" would really be what they want. It is clear, short, easy to understand and you can't get confused what you're buying.
@@IWillSmurfYou no that will be added on later in front, in the middle and at the end depending on which one you buy it's one, two or all three, maybe even a version were one word is taken out to make it extra clear and easy to know what you're getting.
I think this would have worked better if they dropped the "core" too. Because it would be Intel 9 and you could abbreviate "Intel" to "i". You'd still call it i9 and it's the full name.
@@amogoose2971 Those are getting discontinued actually, no more Pentium or Celerons. Albeit they're getting replaced later for another series of very cheap CPUs that haven't been named yet. Still it is fairly simple: You can differentiate by the gaps in the name. Just like with these names from the video. You have one named ultra and the other has a gap where you would expect to say ultra, meaning it's a non-ultra CPU. You don't need another label, like "mainstream" to realize it's not an ultra. Also the Celerons and Pentiums would still say Pentiums and Celerons with no single digit 3 5 7 or 9, if they still existed.
I prefer the old one in many ways, and i like it when companies like lenovo put "i" in their laptop model to imply that the laptop is using an intel cpu.
I hate it how every single, literally every single big company is fucking up their already good products for no apparent reason. Literally nobody asked them to change the name lol people would have been happier if they somehow dropped the prices instead
@@TruthHurtsSmallBrains-rb1wo That's what I was in about people like OP haven't ever dealt with how dumb this generation is growing up to be but that's probably Because some people don't have the patience to reach out to theirs kids and teach them with patience
Instead of core 9 and stuff like that, they could keep most of the old naming scheme but change out i for u and c, for ultra and core. For example: intel u9 14-900k or intel c3 12100F. I would love to hear other opinions on this, as I think the old way was over complicated and the new way sounds bad, I think this idea is a good middle ground.
Well, things change; surprised they went with the "i", followed by the processor as long as they did; processor names (2, 3, or 4)86 only went from 1985-1993, then changed to Pentium, with the last big one coming out 7 years later as Pentium 4, then Core Duo, but the i(3, 5, 7, lately 9) went on for over 15 years, going back to '07, which is the longest I've seen a processor keep an old name.
Well, they changed to Pentium because they couldn’t trademark a number (586), the Pentium 4 garnered quite a bad reputation, so it made sense to change to Core, and the “i” more clearly delineates the different tiers. I don’t see a reason to drop the “i” when it’s been so successful.
@@GRBtutorials It is true that Pentium 4 processors were all over the place when they were popular, and it looks like Intel found the lineage they're sticking with. I do find the i-7 label to be a lot more accurate, even for older PC's than Pentium 4's that was all over the place. Enjoying the i-9 in my laptop so far, speaking of which!
@@rsgxyt if you know how the naming schemes work, then you really don't need it. 100-300 is i3 400-600 is i5 700-800 is i7 900 is i9 With of course all the numbers after the distinguisher, but those are just refreshes of the original
I don’t think it’s that good. I think it’s more of a lazy attempt at minimalism and makes it just sound wrong to say. Saying “Core 9” makes it sound like it has 9 cores whereas just saying “core i9” shows that it’s a 9-grade intel cpu
I have always called their CPU's by the last part anyway (example I would call the i7 6700k just the 6700k or a i7 12700k just the 12700k so makes no difference for me. The numbers is all you need anyway. They give all the info you need.
I have a dozen machines in my vintage/retro collection that used the 80xxx CPU naming convention. 8088, 80386, '486, and '586 (aka, Pentium). I've never had a 286 though.
Its actually a good idea, a lot of scammers in online shop have all caps "GAMING PC I7" But its just I7 3rd gen or even the 1st gen even 😂. Those poor kids getting scammed.
And? Now they'll just write like intel core 7, and if they write like intel core 7 2600 hidden in the description they wouldn't really be selling a scam since they list specifically which component but loads of people wouldn't care about it and miss it
I think there's nothing wrong with the naming scheme the i3, 5, 7, 9 denote the classification tier, the 14 in 14700 denotes the generation of processor and the "k" denotes the special model that it is it's really not that hard to understand if anyone thinks it's confusing.
They basically haven’t changed anything then… It would’ve been called the core i9 14900k before, now it’s called the core 9 14900k. Really makes it a whole lot better huh…
It actually made sense with the AMD Fx series, with the first number representing the amount of cores. Now we have 3-5-7-9 which just don't mean anything
I've always found Intel models to be easier to know which is the better one due to their naming methods. I still don't know how to tell which Ryzen CPUs are the good ones
We have PC builds IN STOCK today at zttbuilds.com 😉
They are also dropping a digit too. So it would be the 1490k
I think they should call it the i9 14900k
Intel "c9" 14900k or whatever number, this is the only way i see that we would stop calling the prosesors with "i 9,5,3"
I knew 'i' was always a useless prefix since I was using Intel Core 2 duo , then intel suddenly came with Intel core i3, i5 & i7 series, like some Employee told them to copy the Apple company naming schemes. Now the naming goes to the right straight track. Better Late, than Never! Now we can feel own intel's uniqueness with the Intel naming instead of the apple mix naming scheme.
amd wins match so feels amazing
The 14 in 14700k literally denotes the generation
Exactly. Why not have it Intel 9 14th gen 400k?
@@top.of.redditBecause that's a mouthful.
@@BillyBob-oi9kl Better that than Intel I9 14th gen 14900k
@@top.of.reddit intel core ultra 9 14th gen. at this point just get rid of the rest of the numbers.
@@LagiohX3 You do realise that the numbers do mean something? There is over a 50FPS difference in games from a 13400 and a 13600K. If Intel named both Intel 5 13th gen then it would cause chaos.
We will still call it i9 14900K
Untill they remove the k xD
@@duscha55I don't think they will remove the k however. It DOES differentiate between desktop and mobile chips.
@@duscha55why would they do that. That would make it a different chip
S14 i9k
@@Grason20it also differentiates between chips you can overclock and chips you can’t
For what I'm concerned "i" was more of a brand than Core was. If I had to simplify, Core is what I would remove.
fr man
So "Intel i9 13900k" is the supposed name now if your idea comes true? Kinda good.
@@lunarpsychocpgHonestly rolls off the tongue better than Intel core 9 13900k
Exaaaactly, core is useless and that's what techies usually skip. Not the "i" 🤦♂️
i mean, there is like pentium, celeron and so on but yeah who cares about them
companies try not to make your brand worse for absolutely 0 reason challenge
Try to make* your brand*
@@NowLedgeOutpost AMD: exist
The 'i' in Intel chips was kinda their trademark
Exactly
iPhone & iPod bruh
@@mehshutup3041 we are talking about processors not gadgets💀
Facts said crewmate
@@omarzag9220But he's red
I like the i9 name. That way you know its intel
Yeah then you could just say the i9 1400k
@@themagician2008i mean for me the best would be just K9 14k cause all we need to know is the CPU, the generation and if it's a k or no k
@@mizofps the I makes it better because then you don't have to say "intel k9 14k"
@@mizofpsi9 easy example what about 11600k this is the or the 13100F
Or the 10105F or 9350KF
Would you easily know which processor is that maybe u and I can do it what about the majority
Same here.
I’ve never heard of a tech person saying “I have an Intel core i9 13th gen 13900kf” literally all you have to say is 13900kf and it gives you the information that it is 1. an intel processor, 2. a 13th gen, 3. the 900 sku, which is the high end range, 4. unlocked, 5. No integrated graphics. What else do you need to know?
Your first point would be incorrect there is nothing that can tell that its an intel cpu, only reason you can tell its an intel cpu bc its 14gen and ryzen is only on 8th gen, correct way to tell that would be intel is that, intel uses K and F and more. Whilst ryzen has WX, X, G, ETC. Aswell you could tell its intel that sku code is 3 digits long but for ryzen its 2
@itsme_neex8
E - embedded
F - no integrated gpu
K - Unlocked
G - has integrated gpu
H - optimized for mobile
K - unlocked
S - special edition
U - power efficent
P - laptop cpu
@@TheHeCatJust so you know 1 youre incorrect and 2 AMD also uses F
@@kingiument4627 You would be right if not that last time they used F in any process was in 2013
@@TheHeCat Incorrect. Ryzen 5 7500f released on july 22 2023
As someone who works in retail selling computers, I promise you this is going to confuse more customers than not.
Core2 duo e6300 and core3 14100f.
I can already hear the confusion
Now people might mistake a CPU as having 7 cores, 9 cores, etc
Tbh, you are right
@@mastone7563what species is your pfp :D
@@biggo4637 it's a fox
@@mastone7563furries yikes 😷
@@mastone7563no furrie
As with Ryzen, I call R3, R5, R7 and R9. I will continue using i3, i5, i7 and i9 for Intel.
smash
Instead of saying core just keep i3 i5 i7 i9.
AMD needs to do AR3 AR5 AR7 AR9 AR ThreadRipper a stands for AMD and R stands for Ryzen.
@@WilliamHollinger2019but then you confuse AR with ARM
Yup not you only, us too
@@WilliamHollinger2019Then we call ICI9😂
We are back to the Core 2 era bruh.
Bring back the core 2 duo
“yo guys today well be reviewing the 7 processor”
The “i” naming scheme is already simple enough and this is what we’ve been used to ever since the first iteration of these CPU’s. Kinda stupid to change it now.
Looks like they want to emphasize the ultra as it is the top of the line variant and the core is the entry level variant. Not everyone is techie people maybe for some people they cant differentiate it in "i". Maybe that is the case
@@reaperstrife3774o they’re pretty much phasing out the traditional Intel Core i-series processors like how Pentium’s used to be top of the line before being as bottom barrel as the Celerons that used to be built after them
i don't know what they are doing during their meeting sessions
true
old days we called:
i5 i3
now we must called:
intel 5 intel 3
Ikr, its as stupid as changing iphone x to phone x
The “i” in i9-14900k sounds cooler tbh. They don’t need to change it.
fax
dont you love it when company does a rebranding to something that doesnt need rebranding
They want to simplify but they'll make it even more confusing
"This ain't it chief"💀
We will call it:
i9 13900k
Simple
that's what most of us call it anyways. If you know about computers you know what "13900k" means anyways
saying i before the cpu for intel cpus is very iconic tbh
nobody would stop me, ill still put i in every cpu.
amd ryzen i5 3600
They should have dropped the Core branding instead, the i has been synonymous with Intel
If you work in an industry where you need to keep track of different CPUs that is actually quite important to see the difference between Atom, Core, Xeon, Pentium, Celeron, Xeon Phi, Itanium, Quark and some other ones. For the consumer pretty much non important but keeps the stackup someone sorted
"Ultra" is just the "Extreme" lineup but on steroids
we goin core 2 duo mode
i3,i5,i7, (and now) i9 has been such a simple designation and adding the generation number made sense, with something like 13900K being clearly 13th gen, 9 level, 0 iteration. I think Intel is trying to kiddie things so it’s less clear which is better than the other and adding core and other words is actually lengthy.
You are missing the point, renaming wasnt to drop the 'i' it was so they can sell better binned 'X' processors like AMD does, but they think 'ultra' sounds cool 😂
BRO, If the old namin works and everyone is happy about it, DO NOT change something that work well!
If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.
it's the big problem of our day and age. employees at IT companies need to justify their salary by finding new "innovations". Some of these innovations consists in messing up with things that were working great for everybody.
I like old intel logo
What do you expect, companies like to over engineer the fuck out of everything
I personally strongly dislike the intel cpus because they’re confusing and not beginner friendly. During all my research, no site has simply told me the large number beginning denotes the generation until a randomly commenter in this section said something.
It is not intuitive
Intel in 2050: Intel C3, C5, C7, C9, C11
We are all gonna keep calling them i3 i5 i7 and i9, it just makes sense
And after this people will be confused between model name and no. of cores in the processor, like Core i9 sounds like a model name but Core 9 will sound like that the processor has 9 cores
The "i" sounds techier and cooler tho
The i in front of the model name goes way back to the i386 for their 80386 processor.
Intel really needs to keep the "i" branding but remove everything else
"Intel i9 14-400k"
For real
It’s a bit of throwback to Core 2 Duo I believe
Core 2 Duo P8600 😂
Waiting for a Core 7 Vinto
Ain't gonna change the fact we'll all be using Arms in 10 years.
This is probably a result of months, maybe years of meetings, in multiple locations.
I think the "intel 14 14th gen Fourteen series 14 times 100 times 10 Processing computer processor core 8 computer core I9 Nine 14900K hyper ultra" would really be what they want. It is clear, short, easy to understand and you can't get confused what you're buying.
Super X Ti ultramega superdooper
@@IWillSmurfYou no that will be added on later in front, in the middle and at the end depending on which one you buy it's one, two or all three, maybe even a version were one word is taken out to make it extra clear and easy to know what you're getting.
I think this would have worked better if they dropped the "core" too. Because it would be Intel 9 and you could abbreviate "Intel" to "i". You'd still call it i9 and it's the full name.
how would they differentiate intel core with intel pentium or celeron then
@@amogoose2971 Those are getting discontinued actually, no more Pentium or Celerons. Albeit they're getting replaced later for another series of very cheap CPUs that haven't been named yet.
Still it is fairly simple: You can differentiate by the gaps in the name.
Just like with these names from the video. You have one named ultra and the other has a gap where you would expect to say ultra, meaning it's a non-ultra CPU. You don't need another label, like "mainstream" to realize it's not an ultra.
Also the Celerons and Pentiums would still say Pentiums and Celerons with no single digit 3 5 7 or 9, if they still existed.
I’m just gonna call it the i9-14900k whether they change it or not
same lol
Same
same
yuppers
same
People from the future watching this
bruh the i is literally iconic
I prefer the old one in many ways, and i like it when companies like lenovo put "i" in their laptop model to imply that the laptop is using an intel cpu.
Just for a letter. Would have been easier and shorter to have i9k 14th gen
👌🏻👌🏻
Idk for somebody who lives off the I5 This is going to save a lot of confusion.
They should just call it 14300, 14500k, 14700k, and 14900k
I hate it how every single, literally every single big company is fucking up their already good products for no apparent reason.
Literally nobody asked them to change the name lol people would have been happier if they somehow dropped the prices instead
@@TruthHurtsSmallBrains-rb1wo
That's what I was in about people like OP haven't ever dealt with how dumb this generation is growing up to be but that's probably Because some people don't have the patience to reach out to theirs kids and teach them with patience
So they're like ditch an alphabet "i" & add a word "ultra" now?
the 14th gen is still called core i9 14900k
Yeah I never thought an “i” would make such a difference
Also the "ultra". That should go AFTER the CPU number, otherwise it just sounds weird
Instead of core 9 and stuff like that, they could keep most of the old naming scheme but change out i for u and c, for ultra and core. For example: intel u9 14-900k or intel c3 12100F. I would love to hear other opinions on this, as I think the old way was over complicated and the new way sounds bad, I think this idea is a good middle ground.
holy shit we all gonna change the logo now, it really hard to imitate these product nowdays
the "i" in the CPU intel are so remarkable
It should just be the Intel i9 13900k
that’s what Im saying
Bruh, just remove the core and only name it Intel i9
Honestly the "i" implies its intel
So either call it intel 9 or just i9
Hahahaha DJ Akademiks reaction
I got a 4060 ti (8gb vram), Ryzen 5 8600G, 2 tb NVMe 4th gen, 16gb DDR5, that looked pretty good besides ram, on Amazon (prebuilt) for $500
That's literally their brand, it's their identity. Why change it? SMH....
bEcAuSe aLl tHe oThEr BiG cOmpAniEs mAkE tHiNgS SiMpLe, wHiCh iS wHaT tHe sTuPiD cUsToMeRs LikE
Well, things change; surprised they went with the "i", followed by the processor as long as they did; processor names (2, 3, or 4)86 only went from 1985-1993, then changed to Pentium, with the last big one coming out 7 years later as Pentium 4, then Core Duo, but the i(3, 5, 7, lately 9) went on for over 15 years, going back to '07, which is the longest I've seen a processor keep an old name.
Well, they changed to Pentium because they couldn’t trademark a number (586), the Pentium 4 garnered quite a bad reputation, so it made sense to change to Core, and the “i” more clearly delineates the different tiers. I don’t see a reason to drop the “i” when it’s been so successful.
@@GRBtutorials It is true that Pentium 4 processors were all over the place when they were popular, and it looks like Intel found the lineage they're sticking with. I do find the i-7 label to be a lot more accurate, even for older PC's than Pentium 4's that was all over the place. Enjoying the i-9 in my laptop so far, speaking of which!
Hey boss, we can save 1 cent per every 100 cpu's we box by removing the "i".
Stingy boss: "Yes, yes excellent."
Wow, removing that "I" was genius move. It makes it so much easier.
We gonna get a new socket for them too?
Now with 2 new sockets per generation! One socket for core, one socket for ultra! XD
Intel: "you mean we can't add 5 numbers that don't represent anything anymore?!?!?!?"
they make a lot of sense if you know how to read them. i9-13900 = 13th gen and 900 is just like a series
they do represent something
@@goodguyLTyou dont even need the i9 part to tell what processor because the series number will already tell you
@@crockpot5850 you need it because there are also the 13100 which is not an i1 but an i3 and the 13400 which is not an i4 but an i5 etc
@@rsgxyt if you know how the naming schemes work, then you really don't need it.
100-300 is i3
400-600 is i5
700-800 is i7
900 is i9
With of course all the numbers after the distinguisher, but those are just refreshes of the original
Let's call it the old way....
The I from intel cpus are so iconic I think this will backfire
It's gonna be weird to have this rebranding, but I personally think it might be good.
I don’t think it’s that good. I think it’s more of a lazy attempt at minimalism and makes it just sound wrong to say. Saying “Core 9” makes it sound like it has 9 cores whereas just saying “core i9” shows that it’s a 9-grade intel cpu
@@enlargedquack i think it has something to do with chip binning.
@@mio2540 What’s that?
@@enlargedquack basically silicon lottery. Im thinking ULTRA means the quality of the silicon. so more OC potential, stable at lower voltages n stuff.
How is core 9 is better than i9
Also when I core I expect to get number of cores
This didn't age well
Intel Core 9 is how I've calling it for more than a decade...
I have always called their CPU's by the last part anyway (example I would call the i7 6700k just the 6700k or a i7 12700k just the 12700k so makes no difference for me.
The numbers is all you need anyway.
They give all the info you need.
Isnt there i5-12700k and i7-12700k though?
@@1999moniz i5 is 12600k
Or just Intel I9 14900k
Cpu names are already confusing enough for me so I guess can't go downhill enough from here
that will hit keywords really hard
LTT literally said that the current naming scheme was "pretty decent" and he's shaming Intel for ditching it
smash
This ain't it chief!!
For me "I" is really fitting for intel processors
I have a dozen machines in my vintage/retro collection that used the 80xxx CPU naming convention. 8088, 80386, '486, and '586 (aka, Pentium). I've never had a 286 though.
Its actually a good idea, a lot of scammers in online shop have all caps "GAMING PC I7" But its just I7 3rd gen or even the 1st gen even 😂. Those poor kids getting scammed.
And? Now they'll just write like intel core 7, and if they write like intel core 7 2600 hidden in the description they wouldn't really be selling a scam since they list specifically which component but loads of people wouldn't care about it and miss it
Then they could have something like a Core 2 Duo and people could fall for it. Not a good idea.
You should do a video explaining what the numbers and letters in amds cpus (and maybe even Intels) actually mean
The i in the names were iconic tho
I think there's nothing wrong with the naming scheme the i3, 5, 7, 9 denote the classification tier, the 14 in 14700 denotes the generation of processor and the "k" denotes the special model that it is it's really not that hard to understand if anyone thinks it's confusing.
Intel Management: „We have too many characters“ „In a matter of fact…”
Nah the "i" is iconic for intel i would keep it
I really liked the old naming scheme
I have a Intel Core 2. It's an old processor, but Intel has used that type of naming before
That just makes it more confusing because I already had the i locked in
The " i " is classy
Feel like most people just say 14900k
Old naming have no problem we are used to it
And here I am still rocking my i5-4670k. Still running strong after all these years.
The I is iconic, this is gonna backfire for a bit
They basically haven’t changed anything then… It would’ve been called the core i9 14900k before, now it’s called the core 9 14900k. Really makes it a whole lot better huh…
It actually made sense with the AMD Fx series, with the first number representing the amount of cores. Now we have 3-5-7-9 which just don't mean anything
yeah, I really like the old intel names
Nobody under the age of 40 says the "Intel 14th Gen Core" part
All you need is" i9 14900k"
Issue is the "core" name, as its just confusing to outsiders when cores are also features.
You don't even need the branding at all since everything you need to know is in the model number
I've always found Intel models to be easier to know which is the better one due to their naming methods. I still don't know how to tell which Ryzen CPUs are the good ones
It is way damn better then just the number
My stick value 📈
I actually don't mind this