Tiger 2 10.5 cm vs is 3. And funniest part of this videos is all ussr tanks lack one essential thing neutral steering even top tier ussr tanks don't have it
with soviet tanks, most people don't usually turn without first moving forward for a bit then braking on one track to use the momentum to turn faster. It actually keeps up the traverse rate if you first convert your forward momentum into the turn.
Actualy if u turn the vehicul normaly. U whould get speed backward make 180 sliding and than move forward and do the same . russian tank may not get nutral stering but they never get rubber tracks
I like to bring my t 34 - 57 and 85 to 7.0 because I feel very easy to pen lepords than tigers and panthers. BT 5 is very useful to achieve god mode achievement. If you could goto a good position you can easily pen any tank in br 7 from sides.
Honestly the only reason I have T 44 100 and BT5 in the same lineup is so I can get God with BT and have money to repair anything else. Sometimes will do a full match in BT alone.
@@burneracc2567 I use t44-100, t34- 85, 57, and bt5, I rarely use t44 (85) besause of its high repair cost. Yak 7b is also useful to get a kill or two. It is the only low tier fighter that has access to rockets.with low repair cost.
nah gaijin just doesnt model them properly, irl they used a later version of the hl230 which had reduced rpm and power in order to solve some of the issues with reliability, its pretty much the engine on later panthers like the panther F. Also, gaijin doesn't really model in the traction of both tanks properly, whereas the tiger had better traction on muddy terrain, the is2 has better traction on icy roads and winter terrain.
Is-2 wasn’t really meant to engage tanks it was for breaking through hardened defensive lines, while platoons of agile medium tanks such as the T-34/85 would exploit the hole in the defensive line and wreak havoc with their agility and firepower combination. The Tiger 2 would generally have the advantage in one on one engagements irl not because it was a superior piece of equipment but because it was almost always used in a defensive role which gives a massive edge to any military force, but if we’re are talking about which vehicle fulfilled is design role better it’s hands down the IS-2.
@@happyalltheday2275 capable of it but not it’s designed intention, T-34/85s were better suited due to their mobility and capability of putting more rounds on target faster.
IS-2 still has a big flaw of it's predecessors and frontally can be 80% of times one hit killed by all German tanks it meet... LFP to either left or right of the driver. At over 800m Tiger II will win this duel easily, closer and first shot wins.
Honestly, I was half expecting the Tiger II to shoot off one of the IS-2's tracks during the reverse speed challenge. I think that'd be funny to do in kne of the comparison tests
@@AFT_05G thanks for the weight correction, however I feel like the tiger is quite impressive for it’s mobility weighing 67 tons and having a 700hp engine and still being able to go 30kmh is pretty impressive
@@Jpz-4-5 And what about unpaved roads? And the transportation of a tank over a long distance? How long will Tiger 2 pass without repair? These are different tanks, different tasks. IS2 is more versatile.
@@BibEvgen while the tiger variants were heavy break through tanks and not meant to be travelling the thousands of miles that they were tasked with, and hitting 30kmh is quite impressive in that thing with it weighing 67 tons and with a transmission made of paper ashes
Meh, both are practically equal, but the IS2 is a lot lower profile, and the Tiger 2 has a decent reload. The IS2 is also faster overall. Not by much in forward and turn speed, but still
Kind of hilarious the Tiger P is at an equal BR with the IS 2 44. Even more hilarious how its on the same BR with the Super Pershing. Even more how the idiot snail wanted to increase the BR of the Jumbo to 6.3. As if its not useless enough already. Germany suffers so much guys.
@@combatantezoteric2965 I really dont see how the S Pershing is much better than IS2 besides gun depression. Long 88 can lol pen its hull and turret face, it cant pen the hull of the IS2. It also fires really slowly, its slower than IS2.
150mm plate vs a 183mm hesh with 225mm of pen The shot lost 75% of its shrapnel due to most of it trying to force its way in Also hesh is a squash shell that smacks into a plate welding itself then detonating
@@विनितकुमार-य5ढ tbh is2 would benefit from those fuel tanks if they updated them to where they don't explode because the soviets had the idea of lining their fuel tanks with a material that made it so that if they were shot it wouldn't combust , also turning it into extra armor
I think IS2 better if the player can hulldown, because IS2 have weak spot in front bottom armor and IS 2 has small cheeks than Tiger 2 (P). But Tiger 2 have more firepower and medium reload time
@@davidshastitko5623 buildings to hide behind works for every tank. Its not a seperate advantage for the beloved IS-2 1944. Tell me what to do when you're going to get clapped by King Tigers 1.5 kilometers away.
@@davidshastitko5623 Lol bro what you say does not make any sense, having about 25 seconds of reload doesnt go well with hiding behind buildings, especially when your enemy is close to you if you are far away to the enemy, then bear the shitty optics with no zoom
@@inniyewtesfaw2003 Tiger ll is buffed asf in war thunder, it shouldn't be that fast, it had way less torque than the IS-2's engine, even tho it had more hp, it didn't had 700hp, it only had 600hp net.
It depends really if you wiggle your turret in the tiger ll it abuses game physics and it makes it really easy for someone to fuck up their shot on your turret I use this a lot it works like a charm
tiger 2 p will win due to practicality of long 88 and is2 due to higher brain cell among average russian mains player and of course russian bias if thats real
The fact that Gaijin doubled the IS2s reload (compared to the irl reload) even tho the IS2 has the same pen as the Tiger 2P , it has worse frontal armor, worse turret armor, a large cupola, the shell is larger so its has more problems with volumetric armor, it has less gun depression... And then there is the Tiger 2H with even better turret armor in the same BR. The IS 2 sucks for its BR and the reload isnt justified
Как историк из России скажу:оба хороши. У ИС-2 пушка большая а у Королевского скорострельность (что тоже важно!), первый такой, более штурмовой а второй подходит для истребления средних танков
@@ДракОн-о3к он просто себе не представляет как выглядит снаряд полностью! эти 122мм на пальцах не очень много,а вот приведи ещё и длину, он уже такого не скажет
Так вся грустная история эволюции немецких танков это путь превращения из нормальных танков в переутяжеленные пт установки. Если бы наши пошли по такому пути то в конце нам нечем бы было брать те же потсдамы и прочие фестунги включая берлин. А у немцев уже после второй половины войны такой задачи не стояло, так что в играх всякий немецкий бумажный конструктив выгоднее смотрится просто благодаря заточенности под пт требования и нет никаких требований под вес мостов, габариты тоннелей, расход топлива итд итп. Поэтому удел немецких танков это рассказы про то как "мой дед на пантере подбил 2-10-50 советских танков", а на моей доле как мой друг моего деда в экипаже Т-34-85 расстреливал по пять бк в день под Веной.
irl the IS2 would most likely win as it would actually arrive in the field and not sink, have a transmission breakdown, or gearbox breakdown. The tiger 2s are horribly designed, also the armor on the tiger 2s was only 70% effective due to how low of a quality the metals were.
@@adibar9066 the metals weren't really low quality, the germans just lost a molybdenum mine and lost one of the most important materials they used to harden the steel. The metal itself was a high "quality" - as in lack of impurities - but the materials they had to use for hardening were a significant amount less reliable and it led to the brittle armour characteristic of late war German tanks.
Well i know that's only a game, but the IS-2 engine has way more torque than the Tiger ll's engine irl, idk why almost every single german tank in the game is way more mobile than it should be, meanwhile they nerfed some sherman's and the M6 engine while the germans can stay with their 700hp engine instead of their real 600hp...
@@georgeklemens7577 soviet quality was very low for wartime, single hit from long 88 and is-2 whole upper armour could fell to the ground thought givin driver much better visibility. Even is-3 had serious problems with steel and weld quality.
@@rakettimies2670 That was generally due to the fact that the first batch of IS-3s' production were in rush. Russians want something capable to shock their allies, who soon won't keep being their allies anymore.
Never understood the point in tiger 2. I mean yeah, the front plate and gun is good and all , but what about the side armor? Theoretically it could be penned by sherman's 75mm. And the weight is 65 tonnes, Jesus Christ that's a lot... Meanwhile is-2 weights 42 tonnes and can offer similar decree of protection with stronger sides, better mobility and more than comparable gun
Because bigger is better in hitlers mind also depending on the Tiger 2 model the weight is between 68 to 71 tons with the TD being 75 but we don't talk about the TD
@@kaiserjohnny4098 Yeah IS-2 transmissions were shit as well, except unlike the Tiger 2 they could recover and repair it, or just outright replace it with 5 more.
@@ilimes you mean that entire world of Italy, Vichy France, Austria, Hungary, Bulgaria, Romania, Czechoslovakia, Finland and a little bit of other minor nations against one Red Army or what? And yeah tens of millions people... around 20 million civilian people who died from genocidal politic of Nazis, while military losses of Axis and Red Army on eastern front is 5 millions against 8. Good point, boy, good point
@@combatantezoteric2965 in synthetic comparaison like this the Tiger II seems better, but on the battlefield the IS-2 is just a "smarter" design, like the hull turn rate, when you're in neutral and want to steer, the IS-2 loose, when actually in battle you want to accelerate a bit and then turn and when you do that you turn your hull way faster than the tiger II. Things that hurt tho on the IS-2 is ots shitty reload, shitty gun dep and meh turret armor Edit: what I mean is that in battle the IS-2 perform way better than in synthetic comparaison like this. Require more braincells than playing a Tiger II tho
@@Blue-nw3li i also thinks that the soviet designs for heavy tanks is smarter than the germans one, like their turret is harders to hit, they are smaller etc, to me the germans tanks like tiger 2 looks just like "ok frontal plates angled and armor, and more armor on the flat turret"
thats now how an is2 turns.... with the is2 you want to tap gas a bit and swing the tank with momentum.. edit : with the momentum it could definitely turn faster than a tiger2 doing the same thing : )
Depends on who shoots first,but just saying it's way easier to kill an IS-2 with a Tiger II than a killing a Tiger II with IS-2.Tiger II P's turret is pretty trolly if you wouldn't aim correctly other than that it has no weakspots at the front.Meanwhile IS-2's lower glacis is always an easy place to shoot,even a Panzer IV H can penetrate it.
@@bomboclatlawg got it with soviet 85 mm and with a banger of a shot from bumpy terrain with Tiger 1. Then i met an H and it's immune to KwK36 from the front :(
i like how gaijin thinks these vehicles are equal (is2 cant angle the turret and tiger 2p can angle the turret and bounce is2, not to mention the reload)
@@petrkdn8224 if he doesent wiggle the turret that is, not to mention the reload speed and that the lower plate of is2 is butter and only retards shoot the turret or the angled plate and then complain boohoo is2 op ples nerf gaijin boohoo
![[STOCK] Meme Tank Grind is...Hilarious! 😱😱😱 INCREDIBLE Grind for modules! 💀💀💀](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nw4JSCo0uN8/mqdefault.jpg)
![[STOCK] Meme Tank Grind is...Hilarious! 😱😱😱 INCREDIBLE Grind for modules! 💀💀💀](/img/tr.png)
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
Which one do you like more? Comment below !
Tiger II best
The Maus
🐯
King Tiger is better
Is2 pog
Short answer: depends how stupid your enemy is.
If your enemy is more than you then you win...
If your enemy is less than you, well...
Don't forget gaijin luck
I agree!
Tiger 2 10.5 cm vs is 3. And funniest part of this videos is all ussr tanks lack one essential thing neutral steering even top tier ussr tanks don't have it
bmd4: am i a joke to you?
with soviet tanks, most people don't usually turn without first moving forward for a bit then braking on one track to use the momentum to turn faster. It actually keeps up the traverse rate if you first convert your forward momentum into the turn.
Yo, can i ask you a question?(sorry for the bad english)
Actualy if u turn the vehicul normaly. U whould get speed backward make 180 sliding and than move forward and do the same . russian tank may not get nutral stering but they never get rubber tracks
t28 (usa)
You can decrease your turn around time by shifting into 2nd or 3rd gear with Cruise Control. Goes down from 30 seconds to like 5 seconds.
Decrease?
For what tank tho?
@@spadehaze1541 yes as in decrease the time for a full rotation to be made
@@memeboi6108 It works for any tank. Its especially useful on casemate tank destroyers.
Thanks I’ll tru
I can feel the pain of all tortured transmissions
Only the tiger 2 has a tortured transmission the IS2 has a really good transmission
The tiger wasn’t mass produced either like the is2 so more is2 were made them tiger ll
I like to bring my t 34 - 57 and 85 to 7.0 because I feel very easy to pen lepords than tigers and panthers.
BT 5 is very useful to achieve god mode achievement.
If you could goto a good position you can easily pen any tank in br 7 from sides.
Honestly the only reason I have T 44 100 and BT5 in the same lineup is so I can get God with BT and have money to repair anything else. Sometimes will do a full match in BT alone.
i use BTR 152 to Kill modern light tank
That's sick
I use sturmpanzer to kill tigers ii and panthers in 7.0
@@burneracc2567 I use t44-100, t34- 85, 57, and bt5, I rarely use t44 (85) besause of its high repair cost. Yak 7b is also useful to get a kill or two. It is the only low tier fighter that has access to rockets.with low repair cost.
Königstiger.the true king....though the is2 Is great aswell...both can be lethal to each other if player has a brain cell or two
nah gaijin just doesnt model them properly, irl they used a later version of the hl230 which had reduced rpm and power in order to solve some of the issues with reliability, its pretty much the engine on later panthers like the panther F. Also, gaijin doesn't really model in the traction of both tanks properly, whereas the tiger had better traction on muddy terrain, the is2 has better traction on icy roads and winter terrain.
@Finlay Stafford no?
@Finlay Stafford Very good point
IS-2 Has a lot less armor, a lot worse gun with 2.5x the reload and worse pen, no neutral steering
If Tiger shot that IS anywhere else in the ufp, other than black hole drivers optics, it's fuel would go boom.
Is-2 wasn’t really meant to engage tanks it was for breaking through hardened defensive lines, while platoons of agile medium tanks such as the T-34/85 would exploit the hole in the defensive line and wreak havoc with their agility and firepower combination. The Tiger 2 would generally have the advantage in one on one engagements irl not because it was a superior piece of equipment but because it was almost always used in a defensive role which gives a massive edge to any military force, but if we’re are talking about which vehicle fulfilled is design role better it’s hands down the IS-2.
Correct
Isn't IS-2 used to kill Tigers?
@@happyalltheday2275 capable of it but not it’s designed intention, T-34/85s were better suited due to their mobility and capability of putting more rounds on target faster.
и где то матерятся немецкие танкисты которые увидели ис 2 )
Looking at casualties the only havoc in ww2 was on russians 🤣🤣🤣
I like how the Tiger IIs turret doesn't move at all while doing 360°
Stabilize
Stalinium vs Adolfium.
Hitlerinium*
@@antoniodubelj8105 no its adolfium
Stalinus Adolfus
@@offendershuffle9386 libera et impera.
Ivan with Stalinium meets Hans with Adolfinium
Wow yukari Akiyama simp
When the beast meat the soviets
*in a Soviet made game*
Meat?
@@bulletso206 MEAT.
The length of the video. NICE
IS-2 still has a big flaw of it's predecessors and frontally can be 80% of times one hit killed by all German tanks it meet... LFP to either left or right of the driver. At over 800m Tiger II will win this duel easily, closer and first shot wins.
Honestly, I was half expecting the Tiger II to shoot off one of the IS-2's tracks during the reverse speed challenge.
I think that'd be funny to do in kne of the comparison tests
Balancé par excelancé. Also Tiger shot IS in the cheesy drivers optics in the front. Anywhere else in that plate and IS fuel gets *excited.*
I wasn't surprised about the tug of war result. After all, the King Tiger IS actually much heavier than the IS-2.
67 tons that bridge wouldn’t even support its weight not to mention including the 53 tons the is2 weighs
@@Jpz-4-5 IS-2 weighs 46 tons barely heavier than Panther.Though in terms of mobility it’s only a slightly better than a Tiger II.
@@AFT_05G thanks for the weight correction, however I feel like the tiger is quite impressive for it’s mobility weighing 67 tons and having a 700hp engine and still being able to go 30kmh is pretty impressive
@@Jpz-4-5 And what about unpaved roads? And the transportation of a tank over a long distance? How long will Tiger 2 pass without repair?
These are different tanks, different tasks. IS2 is more versatile.
@@BibEvgen while the tiger variants were heavy break through tanks and not meant to be travelling the thousands of miles that they were tasked with, and hitting 30kmh is quite impressive in that thing with it weighing 67 tons and with a transmission made of paper ashes
I love the Is-2 but is obvious that the winner will be the Tiger II. Now, let's watch the video.
Edit: that was fun.
Meh, both are practically equal, but the IS2 is a lot lower profile, and the Tiger 2 has a decent reload. The IS2 is also faster overall. Not by much in forward and turn speed, but still
@@imperialtiger9015 tiger 2 has better pen than the is-2 aswell
@@alphaplayzz1381 but soviet have large diameter gun
@@Anti-Hero-vj6ms Larger diameter = more susceptible to volumetric
@@mikailvito7200 yes, but i think that a large caliber is very helpfull, like the is2 can easily kill panthers with the 122mm
Kind of hilarious the Tiger P is at an equal BR with the IS 2 44. Even more hilarious how its on the same BR with the Super Pershing. Even more how the idiot snail wanted to increase the BR of the Jumbo to 6.3. As if its not useless enough already.
Germany suffers so much guys.
not more hilarious because the super pershing is much better than the IS-2. Sill behind the tiger II p
@@combatantezoteric2965 I really dont see how the S Pershing is much better than IS2 besides gun depression. Long 88 can lol pen its hull and turret face, it cant pen the hull of the IS2. It also fires really slowly, its slower than IS2.
@@Vlad_-_-_ much better turret armor, neutral steering, lower reload, higher pen
@@Vlad_-_-_ not sure if its slower but what I can see is that it also has pretty similar reverse speed ( 13kmph vs 16kmph )
@@combatantezoteric2965 that's because of it's engine. Also it's repair cost is ridiculously high, nearly double the tiger 2 p and is2-1944
0:15 Impossible, the engine would have immediately exploded
3:47 well that was a dumb place to kill a tiger P
IS-2 would be amazing if not for the reload taking an eternity
even reload isn't as bad as nonexistent gun depression - even smallest bump on the road and u can't do shit
@@1222dss yeah, seems like it was designed for open flat country or city fighting
@@1222dss the poor gun depression is because Eastern European terrain is mostly flat
Don't forget that irl the IS2 had to put the gun in the neutral position to even consider reloading lol
@@Red14998 didn't most large cal cannons have to do this
The 183mm hesh should have killed the tiger 2
I am confused too
150mm plate vs a 183mm hesh with 225mm of pen
The shot lost 75% of its shrapnel due to most of it trying to force its way in
Also hesh is a squash shell that smacks into a plate welding itself then detonating
Is2 would have survived the shot too if not for the big fuel tanks in front
@@विनितकुमार-य5ढ tbh is2 would benefit from those fuel tanks if they updated them to where they don't explode because the soviets had the idea of lining their fuel tanks with a material that made it so that if they were shot it wouldn't combust , also turning it into extra armor
@@kaiserjohnny4098 holy shit didnt know that
Imma go search this
When Soviet heavy Tanks reverse faster than American medium tanks.
I'm looking at you Shermans.
Hahaha! imagine not suffering UK Cromwells and Centurions. xD There is only 1 gear with those, Forward.
@@k-aw-teksleepysageuni8181 Reverse gears are only for parking purposes.
3:50 ООО ДА ГАНС МЫ ПОБЕДИТЕН
i like the video timer lol
3:47 song please ?
I think IS2 better if the player can hulldown, because IS2 have weak spot in front bottom armor and IS 2 has small cheeks than Tiger 2 (P). But Tiger 2 have more firepower and medium reload time
IS-2 1944 has shitty optics without any zoom, even 5.7 IS-2 has more zoom which helps for long range combat
@@ultravioletsus so? Most battles in WT have lots of buildings to hide behind
@@davidshastitko5623 buildings to hide behind works for every tank. Its not a seperate advantage for the beloved IS-2 1944.
Tell me what to do when you're going to get clapped by King Tigers 1.5 kilometers away.
@@ultravioletsus Your going to hide behind buildings duh
@@davidshastitko5623 Lol bro what you say does not make any sense,
having about 25 seconds of reload doesnt go well with hiding behind buildings, especially when your enemy is close to you
if you are far away to the enemy, then bear the shitty optics with no zoom
I think the is-2 would have won the 360 degree rotation if you put it in a higher gear
Ofc it would commiebo
No surprise the tiger 2 pulls the is-2, it weighs about 50,000 lbs more
Also hydro-electric transmissions will do that vs rugged, straight cut gear transmissions of Soviet tonks.
@@k-aw-teksleepysageuni8181
Only weight is relevant for traction, which is painfully obvious in the video, you numptie
Oof I'm not sure if you realize Chen but the tiger2s weight in tons is between 68 to 71 depending on the tiger2 model
@@kaiserjohnny4098
IS-2 weighs 46 t
That's 22 t or ~50,000 lbs difference from 68 t
So?
@@kaiserjohnny4098 yeah I checked it on wikipedia and did some quick maths
The tiger in the race was not in a strait line giving the is-2 an advantage
it's not even close lmao is-2 is faster and that's easily observable after playing literally 2 matches in one
@@inniyewtesfaw2003 Tiger ll is buffed asf in war thunder, it shouldn't be that fast, it had way less torque than the IS-2's engine, even tho it had more hp, it didn't had 700hp, it only had 600hp net.
Um it was that fast sorry to de bunk your argument some modals had a 900 hp engine
Hey Steel guru, I always aim under the is-2 no matter if it's tiger i or tiger ii the underside of the is-2 has fuel that can be easily blown up
As someone who played both, i had more fun with the is2, i felt more badass with the is2, i 1v1's i felt the is2 was superior
Agreed. That big boomstick is so much fun to derp into the front plates of Panthers.
It depends really if you wiggle your turret in the tiger ll it abuses game physics and it makes it really easy for someone to fuck up their shot on your turret I use this a lot it works like a charm
1:10
And that is how the IS-2h was made
Next fight: L3/33 CC vs Maus
tiger 2 p will win due to practicality of long 88 and is2 due to higher brain cell among average russian mains player and of course russian bias if thats real
Yea Soviet low tier players are kinda braindead
@@kahficoy3189 German every tier players are definitely braindead
@@kahficoy3189 its like its **LOW TIER** and the players just started playing the game?
@Finlay Stafford yes it is so easy get kills even in is2 with long reload in face i survive longer when using is 2 than tiger 2
@@нєманрсь still more brains than the dev team of gajin considering how they've upkept the game
The fact that Gaijin doubled the IS2s reload (compared to the irl reload) even tho the IS2 has the same pen as the Tiger 2P , it has worse frontal armor, worse turret armor, a large cupola, the shell is larger so its has more problems with volumetric armor, it has less gun depression... And then there is the Tiger 2H with even better turret armor in the same BR.
The IS 2 sucks for its BR and the reload isnt justified
what music on 0:11?
Как историк из России скажу:оба хороши. У ИС-2 пушка большая а у Королевского скорострельность (что тоже важно!), первый такой, более штурмовой а второй подходит для истребления средних танков
Как раз таки более штурмовой тигр,там калибр не сильно меньше,но и брони по больше…
@@khabibbutaev3619 немного поменьше? 122мм у иса и 88мм у тигра2 это немного поменьше? Небыло у тигров 105мм,это вгшный прикол, а затем и тундры
@@ДракОн-о3к он просто себе не представляет как выглядит снаряд полностью!
эти 122мм на пальцах не очень много,а вот приведи ещё и длину, он уже такого не скажет
Так вся грустная история эволюции немецких танков это путь превращения из нормальных танков в переутяжеленные пт установки. Если бы наши пошли по такому пути то в конце нам нечем бы было брать те же потсдамы и прочие фестунги включая берлин. А у немцев уже после второй половины войны такой задачи не стояло, так что в играх всякий немецкий бумажный конструктив выгоднее смотрится просто благодаря заточенности под пт требования и нет никаких требований под вес мостов, габариты тоннелей, расход топлива итд итп. Поэтому удел немецких танков это рассказы про то как "мой дед на пантере подбил 2-10-50 советских танков", а на моей доле как мой друг моего деда в экипаже Т-34-85 расстреливал по пять бк в день под Веной.
@@MrNovichok82 увы и ах всё так!
I’m irl I feel the match would be even but overall I’d take Germany cuz I’m biased anyways haha
Germany's tanks are so undertiered anyway
irl the IS2 would most likely win as it would actually arrive in the field and not sink, have a transmission breakdown, or gearbox breakdown. The tiger 2s are horribly designed, also the armor on the tiger 2s was only 70% effective due to how low of a quality the metals were.
@@adibar9066 the metals weren't really low quality, the germans just lost a molybdenum mine and lost one of the most important materials they used to harden the steel. The metal itself was a high "quality" - as in lack of impurities - but the materials they had to use for hardening were a significant amount less reliable and it led to the brittle armour characteristic of late war German tanks.
@@adibar9066 you do know it's not just German tanks that suffer from transmission problems right?
@@adibar9066 ah yes russian optics would most defintely help them.
oh wait, never mind that wasnt the case :D
All I see is a cat killer getting bullied by a big cat
Tiger 2's a man's tank, its just, most of the time, its boys playing it.
IS-3 vs Tiger 2
Ivan: BADIM HIT THE GAS BADIM
BADIM: OYYY OPA
HANS: shit we dont have speed
Im playing with king tiger and always told my self why I played Germany suffer
EBR VS R3 T20 please !))
Well i know that's only a game, but the IS-2 engine has way more torque than the Tiger ll's engine irl, idk why almost every single german tank in the game is way more mobile than it should be, meanwhile they nerfed some sherman's and the M6 engine while the germans can stay with their 700hp engine instead of their real 600hp...
Tiger 2 still has a better reverse than a Panther though lol
Panther still has a better reverse than any tank with the Cromwell chassis though lol
IS-2 the legend of reverse boi.
I just hope there is one man that could animate 2 thicc heavy tank as anime girls doing a tug of war battle and other competitions
The Tiger II (P) has a secret anti "HESH Shell" modification.🤷♂
it has stronger adolfinium
03.30 music name pls
The IS-2 could actually penetrate the Tiger 2 frontal plate at closer ranges because Germany’s metal was of lower quality at the end of the war
Tiger 2 can pen the is2 pretty much anywhere though
@@br-sb6vu not the front plate
@@georgeklemens7577 soviet quality was very low for wartime, single hit from long 88 and is-2 whole upper armour could fell to the ground thought givin driver much better visibility. Even is-3 had serious problems with steel and weld quality.
@@rakettimies2670 only in tge first model, the 1944 one did not have this issue
@@rakettimies2670 That was generally due to the fact that the first batch of IS-3s' production were in rush. Russians want something capable to shock their allies, who soon won't keep being their allies anymore.
the one time gajin removed ussr bias
its like you compare the jollibee and Mcdonald
Who will stop their engines first mid battle?
Lol, more of this, its fun as fuck 🤣 😂
In real life the is 2 would just blow up the turret of whatever it was shooting
Is-2(1944) has 100mm hull but angled more than tiger 2 hesh will pen
3:45 Get Gaijined
No blame yourself for aiming at the UFP and not the turret cheek
because of this IS-2
Never understood the point in tiger 2. I mean yeah, the front plate and gun is good and all , but what about the side armor? Theoretically it could be penned by sherman's 75mm. And the weight is 65 tonnes, Jesus Christ that's a lot...
Meanwhile is-2 weights 42 tonnes and can offer similar decree of protection with stronger sides, better mobility and more than comparable gun
Because bigger is better in hitlers mind also depending on the Tiger 2 model the weight is between 68 to 71 tons with the TD being 75 but we don't talk about the TD
The soviets had better heavy tanks I think due to most being low profile and having used less resources to make them
iirc, IS2s were as reliable as Tiger 2s, except they had more of the former and it was easier to recover and repair.
@@dapperfield595 reliable as? you mean more useful cause Tiger 2s had their size and weight but had terrible transmissions
@@kaiserjohnny4098 Yeah IS-2 transmissions were shit as well, except unlike the Tiger 2 they could recover and repair it, or just outright replace it with 5 more.
is-2 is good for offensive attack
tiger 2 (p) is more of a defensive type
well the tiger 2 was made for attacking at defensive positions while the is 2 was more of a fortification destroyer
Hey steel, what song did you use in the air to ground missile cant kill russias moon rover?
I know why the IS is faster in reverse because it will go back when meeting a German tank
Of course it would ,happened every day in WW2,that's why the Germans lost,doooooohhhhhh!
@@stevenbreach2561 bruh
@@stevenbreach2561 it only took the entire world and tens of millions of people
@@ilimes you mean that entire world of Italy, Vichy France, Austria, Hungary, Bulgaria, Romania, Czechoslovakia, Finland and a little bit of other minor nations against one Red Army or what? And yeah tens of millions people... around 20 million civilian people who died from genocidal politic of Nazis, while military losses of Axis and Red Army on eastern front is 5 millions against 8. Good point, boy, good point
@@diceshard2436 NatSoc isn't genocidal. keep listening to your judeo-allied propaganda, kid.
I think IS 2 is better
how?
@@combatantezoteric2965 in synthetic comparaison like this the Tiger II seems better, but on the battlefield the IS-2 is just a "smarter" design, like the hull turn rate, when you're in neutral and want to steer, the IS-2 loose, when actually in battle you want to accelerate a bit and then turn and when you do that you turn your hull way faster than the tiger II. Things that hurt tho on the IS-2 is ots shitty reload, shitty gun dep and meh turret armor
Edit: what I mean is that in battle the IS-2 perform way better than in synthetic comparaison like this. Require more braincells than playing a Tiger II tho
@@Blue-nw3li i also thinks that the soviet designs for heavy tanks is smarter than the germans one, like their turret is harders to hit, they are smaller etc, to me the germans tanks like tiger 2 looks just like "ok frontal plates angled and armor, and more armor on the flat turret"
Yes very fair, WTF I DOES THIS HAVE RELATED WITH THE HESH, TIGER ON THE BARREL AND THE IS ON HULL… WTF
It got shot in the hull, watch the hit cam, front plate got highlited, which means it got hit
Tiger 2 for me, it has a better reload time more penetration and slightly better armor
Well I think that WW-II real life experience of Tiger crews were only an IS-2's HE shell in their turret cheak which given them an express way to hell
Then a 152mm would have just deleted them from existence
I got a missed by FV4005 in IS-2 from side
ah the good ol' driver hatch
Sight zoom and reolading time?
This IS 2/3s 15 kph reverse gear is so nice
Insane !
King tiger was underpowered
King tiger dragging is-2:
Is2 can reverse faster than a T72B3 🤔🤔
I kinda the love the tiger 2 p turret because is shape is my favorite
Is-2 be like :We don't talk about depression
The IS-2 had 600HP in real life. For some reason in WT it has 520 HP?
thats now how an is2 turns.... with the is2 you want to tap gas a bit and swing the tank with momentum..
edit : with the momentum it could definitely turn faster than a tiger2 doing the same thing : )
The IS-2 Standard shell overpressures. F*****g overpressures. Also the IS-2 OS kinda fast
That Tiger engine n transmission in screaming in agony.
Now PantherG vs T44
Bruh I think you hit the barrel on the tiger 2 p
On the fv4005 test? The front plate got highlighted, so it was hit, not the barrel
Depends on who shoots first,but just saying it's way easier to kill an IS-2 with a Tiger II than a killing a Tiger II with IS-2.Tiger II P's turret is pretty trolly if you wouldn't aim correctly other than that it has no weakspots at the front.Meanwhile IS-2's lower glacis is always an easy place to shoot,even a Panzer IV H can penetrate it.
tiger2P's turret is easy to pen
@@bomboclatlawg got it with soviet 85 mm and with a banger of a shot from bumpy terrain with Tiger 1. Then i met an H and it's immune to KwK36 from the front :(
@@Spido68_the_spectator the tiger 2h is immune to the 122,76,85 from the front
@@bomboclatlawg can't an IS - 2 splash through the flat turret front ? Pretty sure yes
@@Spido68_the_spectator the is2 has 205 mm of pen, the tiger 2h turret armor is 215 or 235, i dont remember
If this is about the Tiger 2 P and the IS-2 why the actual fk is there a FV4005.
Super Pershing
As a fellow comrade bias player, this is unacceptable…
IS 2 Has the Bias on his side
Let's face it, tiger 2 pens is2 like nothing and IS-2 Can't do shit frontally to tiger 2
Lol kinda biased at the shooting part,why didn't you shoot IS-2's lower glacis??
M8 greyhound vs Puma
i like how gaijin thinks these vehicles are equal (is2 cant angle the turret and tiger 2p can angle the turret and bounce is2, not to mention the reload)
Huh? You can easily go through tiger 2 with an angled turret.
@@petrkdn8224 if he doesent wiggle the turret that is, not to mention the reload speed and that the lower plate of is2 is butter and only retards shoot the turret or the angled plate and then complain boohoo is2 op ples nerf gaijin boohoo
@@tuanzixiao3666then shoot the cannon barrel?
@@bomboclatlawgbut when someone is wiggling the turret you expect me to snipe him from 600m? Your a genius mate, is2 don't got a stab
@@tuanzixiao3666 skill issue
В тиктоке твое видео увидел, это твой акк, или кинуть репорт?
Чекни канал! Если понравится, то присоединяйся...)
Asu 85 eats tigers for mid day snacks
Panther G or M26 vs T-44
Bias machine vs Bias machine
I fan of Panzerwaffe and i change Tiger II
Tiger 2 sla 16 diesel version should win the rope pull really easy, diesel has more Torque
Tiger 2 The King
IS-2 The Premiere
Sherman vs T34