Started in Greece, but the Egyptians already had a developed civilization during Plato era with complex buildings that required the knowledge of Geometry.
*Part Three does not even half a million likes, but 7.7k likes* 3:29 am Pacific Daylight Savings Time on Monday, 4 October 2021 Common Era or CE formerly known as Ano Domini or AD
A History of Science and its relations with Philosophy and Religion. Sir W.C. Dampier. Cambridge at the University Press 1977 edition "Natura enim non nisi parendo vincitur".
*¡Philosophy of Science Part Three does not even half a million likes, but 7.7k likes!* 3:29 am Pacific Daylight Savings Time on Monday, 4 October 2021 Common Era or CE formerly known as Ano Domini or AD
The video Just straight up skips 1500 years and denies all of the contributions of muslim civilization. It suddenly says that Aristotle works were discovered in Europe But who did that? Ofc! Muslims who translated greek works and devloped them further. Ibn Rusd was the one who wrote extensive commentaries on Aristotle and brought it to Europe which set the stage for the intellectual movement known as the Renaissance.
Basically in every scientific hypothesis lies atleast one fundamental underlying philosophical assumption. This assumption acts as the interpreter of data acquired by testing. These philosophical assumptions are the reason why there might be totally different paradigms of the same exact observation. Moreover, we will be stuck in an infinite regress if we were to verify every single thing empirically for affirming something. So there has to a-priori axioms which we presuppose to be absolutely true. For instance it is apriori that we assume that everything we sense using our 5 senses is absolutely true. We did not derive this conclusion using the scientific method.
Euro centric view of science. The change of paradigm did not happen in Europe but in the middle east and Andalusia (Cordoba, Grenada, etc.). The "west" did not rediscover Greek philosophy but discoverd it the first-time. Francis Bacon did not invent but reported what happened elsewhere. Ignoring thoses facts does make them disappear!
Let's go in distant future. Let's assume that Science has discovered all the fundamental particles/concepts that explain this universe completely. I think.. 1. These fundamental particles/concepts will have to be taken as a 'given' (with no further explanation possible). 2. This is the ultimate future of science...to reach at something, which has to be taken as a 'given'.
The problem is that our knowledge based on observation/discovery may increase exponentially ad infinitum, but still we will never acquire the absolute truth. Or else we would've become all knowing, all seeing . Then we wouldn't have needed science.
This is a very self-centered narration of science from a European narrow view of history. So, for 1500 years, no major contributions were made to Aristotle's work until it was rediscovered in Europe? The truth is that Westerners only found Aristotle's works by translating them from Arabic texts during the Renaissance. You can yourslef find out where the science had been flourishing before modern europeans.
This is true. And some advances, such as the Arabic system of numerals, was adopted in, I believe (please verify this) the 1200s in Europe. However, it is but a myth that medieval europe was intellectual backwater. European style of fortresses (later adopted by the muslims during the crusades), and the university system etc. began primarily in medieval Europe and spread from there.
Factually incorrect about 1. Galileo ruclips.net/video/MjsL17xSXuA/видео.htmlfeature=shared 2. The middle ages ruclips.net/video/e9-l34TcV_U/видео.htmlfeature=shared Very biased towards a favourable view of the enlightenment. Copleston's 12 volume history of philosophy is a better alternative, for those who have the time.
This presentation has many factual mistakes and distortions to make Europe look like creator of all knowledge ignoring Egyptian, Indian, Chinese and Arab contributions. e.g. ‘Roger Bacon invented gun powder’ ‘ Europe established first Universities and Libraries’ etc etc
Yeah when I heard the gunpowder claim it was of disappointing. Also just casually omits the use of algebra and mathematics in the Middle East strikes me as dubious
we are jumping the gun if we think we can understand space and the stars lets stick to what we understand best in life on earth get that first before we expand our knowledge..
They don't give credit about lot of things that Muslims philosophers did or even Chinese and indian philosophers.They are prejudice towards Their own civilization while denying so many of foreign contributions.
You are an empiricist or a sophist or both. Some ultimate truths. A triangle has 3 sides Truth isn't a lie. Well let's accept what you say Then, If You yourself affirm that There is no ultimate truth well then your comment ' there is no ultimate truth' is ultimate truth.
@@servantoftheexpander9688 Triangle has 3 sides, cause we saw three "sides" and named it, but what is a side? Is it 2D? Is there really any thing like "2 dimensions" in our world, well if say directions, there are "1D" space filling curves aswell, but that doesn't answer what is a "dimension"? But we use dimensions cause it makes sense to us? Imagine a being without sense of direction. And as for the universality of my sayings, I consider the mind to gather bits in universal chaos. But the order is eventually lost, as all things tend to. We think to survive and evolve.
Started in Greece, but the Egyptians already had a developed civilization during Plato era with complex buildings that required the knowledge of Geometry.
Seeing how everything about Egypt is almost unknown,I think it's fair we should say it started in Greece.
@@tobiisiba1641 It's OK to believe in lies, despite the evidence. FACT: Civilization did NOT start in Greece.
quite eurocentric??
Let india introduce themselves
Science has been my favorite subject since a kid.
beautiful music and wonderfully presented, many thanks
Acha :^)
This 3 part series should have millions of views.
Pussy
Yes Taylor, you are one.
But instead we have people watching tik tok all day
*Part Three does not even half a million likes, but 7.7k likes* 3:29 am Pacific Daylight Savings Time on Monday, 4 October 2021 Common Era or CE formerly known as Ano Domini or AD
A History of Science and its relations with Philosophy and Religion.
Sir W.C. Dampier.
Cambridge at the University Press
1977 edition
"Natura enim non nisi parendo vincitur".
"The science is settled", the sentence that will doom humanity.
Thanks, very useful and well sumed up
Ayo semangat terus berkarya, salam sukses dan bahagia
*¡Philosophy of Science Part Three does not even half a million likes, but 7.7k likes!* 3:29 am Pacific Daylight Savings Time on Monday, 4 October 2021 Common Era or CE formerly known as Ano Domini or AD
Please make the history of science in arabic country or from the world, not only from europe
👍👍👍👍👍,
Absolutly astonishing!
The video Just straight up skips 1500 years and denies all of the contributions of muslim civilization.
It suddenly says that Aristotle works were discovered in Europe
But who did that?
Ofc! Muslims who translated greek works and devloped them further.
Ibn Rusd was the one who wrote extensive commentaries on Aristotle and brought it to Europe which set the stage for the intellectual movement known as the Renaissance.
Thanks for this remarkable video.
Thank you very much for these videos!
Science, properly understood, is simply a specialized branch of philosophy that is defined by a specialized set of methodology.
Basically in every scientific hypothesis lies atleast one fundamental underlying philosophical assumption. This assumption acts as the interpreter of data acquired by testing. These philosophical assumptions are the reason why there might be totally different paradigms of the same exact observation.
Moreover, we will be stuck in an infinite regress if we were to verify every single thing empirically for affirming something. So there has to a-priori axioms which we presuppose to be absolutely true. For instance it is apriori that we assume that everything we sense using our 5 senses is absolutely true. We did not derive this conclusion using the scientific method.
Gunpowder was invented by the Chinese, not Roger Bacon.
very informative
Euro centric view of science. The change of paradigm did not happen in Europe but in the middle east and Andalusia (Cordoba, Grenada, etc.). The "west" did not rediscover Greek philosophy but discoverd it the first-time. Francis Bacon did not invent but reported what happened elsewhere. Ignoring thoses facts does make them disappear!
Greece is in the west.
Hmm... @@habeebalrahman515 must look for BlackAthena's topic
Just when thought the background noise had stpped....It restarted.
I loved everything about this video!!!
Copernicus published his book in 1543 and not in 1443. This is a mistake in this video.
Thus far this seems more like a very general history of science than the philosophy of science.
Let's go in distant future. Let's assume that Science has discovered all the fundamental particles/concepts that explain this universe completely.
I think..
1. These fundamental particles/concepts will have to be taken as a 'given' (with no further explanation possible).
2. This is the ultimate future of science...to reach at something, which has to be taken as a 'given'.
The problem is that our knowledge based on observation/discovery may increase exponentially ad infinitum, but still we will never acquire the absolute truth. Or else we would've become all knowing, all seeing . Then we wouldn't have needed science.
so what is the conclusion?
Great!
Thanks a lot for this.
Podría ser posible agregar subtitulos en español! ??? plisssssssss
Does anybody know what the song is that plays at 7:35 ?
Asking for a friend.
ruclips.net/video/bLAXnMMA-IM/видео.html&ab_channel=HopelessGamingChannel
Gregoire Lourme rain.. Its at the credits of the video
Superb
Thank you
0:28 looks like Conan O’Brien.
This is a very self-centered narration of science from a European narrow view of history. So, for 1500 years, no major contributions were made to Aristotle's work until it was rediscovered in Europe? The truth is that Westerners only found Aristotle's works by translating them from Arabic texts during the Renaissance. You can yourslef find out where the science had been flourishing before modern europeans.
This is true. And some advances, such as the Arabic system of numerals, was adopted in, I believe (please verify this) the 1200s in Europe. However, it is but a myth that medieval europe was intellectual backwater. European style of fortresses (later adopted by the muslims during the crusades), and the university system etc. began primarily in medieval Europe and spread from there.
Factually incorrect about
1. Galileo ruclips.net/video/MjsL17xSXuA/видео.htmlfeature=shared
2. The middle ages ruclips.net/video/e9-l34TcV_U/видео.htmlfeature=shared
Very biased towards a favourable view of the enlightenment. Copleston's 12 volume history of philosophy is a better alternative, for those who have the time.
This presentation has many factual mistakes and distortions to make Europe look like creator of all knowledge ignoring Egyptian, Indian, Chinese and Arab contributions. e.g. ‘Roger Bacon invented gun powder’ ‘ Europe established first Universities and Libraries’ etc etc
Yeah when I heard the gunpowder claim it was of disappointing. Also just casually omits the use of algebra and mathematics in the Middle East strikes me as dubious
we are jumping the gun if we think we can understand space and the stars lets stick to what we understand best in life on earth get that first before we expand our knowledge..
Why would we do that, we have learnt a lot from studying space and stars, why limit our focus on one thing at a time
I hate science because to understand most of it you have to learn these 26 weird symbols
Allahu Akbar!
it's A SHAME that you did not give credit to the MUSLIMS which they came with the scientific method.
They don't give credit about lot of things that Muslims philosophers did or even Chinese and indian philosophers.They are prejudice towards Their own civilization while denying so many of foreign contributions.
There is no ultimate truth...
You are an empiricist or a sophist or both.
Some ultimate truths.
A triangle has 3 sides
Truth isn't a lie.
Well let's accept what you say
Then,
If You yourself affirm that There is no ultimate truth well then your comment ' there is no ultimate truth' is ultimate truth.
The paradoxical irony. Wittgenstein
@@servantoftheexpander9688 Triangle has 3 sides, cause we saw three "sides" and named it, but what is a side? Is it 2D? Is there really any thing like "2 dimensions" in our world, well if say directions, there are "1D" space filling curves aswell, but that doesn't answer what is a "dimension"? But we use dimensions cause it makes sense to us? Imagine a being without sense of direction.
And as for the universality of my sayings, I consider the mind to gather bits in universal chaos. But the order is eventually lost, as all things tend to.
We think to survive and evolve.
Yes there is. The axioms upon which we understand everything including science, are considered some ultimate apriori truths.
Renaissance was horrible.
Another propaganda video....