Rare outtakes of Charlie Chaplin in and out of costume - From the Chaplin Archives
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 сен 2024
- • Rare unused footage shot for How to Make Movies (1918) at Charlie Chaplin's newly built Los Angeles motion picture studios. © Roy Export Co. Ltd. Watch How to Make Movies here: • Charlie Chaplin - How ...
• Subscribe to our channel: bit.ly/TheChapl...
• Facebook: / charliechaplinofficial
• Twitter: / chaplinofficial
• Instagram: / charliechaplinofficial
• Official website: www.charliechap...
So handsome young Charlie ❤😘🥰
One of my heroes in life. Can you imagine how gorgeous Los Angeles must have been back then.
Look at the quality of those outtakes. Unbelievable.
Chaplin was and always will be the best
before and after.. was awesome seeing what he looked like
He was very handsome
We never forget u Charlie
We love u & miss u
Rest in peace champ 🌷
The best comedian ever in this world. Charlie Chaplin was amazing
What a genius!
I love his acting
Very interesting to watch but unfortunately it's short in length. I recommend setting playback to a slower speed. It then plays a bit longer and Charlie's expressions are interesting to watch.
Charlie Chaplin ❤❤
Nunca habrá alguien como el , el era incomparable ❤️😍😁
Charles Chaplin THE GENIUS UNICO
He is looking very beautiful and smart
Semplicemente GENIUS THANK You CHARLIE
You can really see how that mustache transforms Chaplin into the Tramp when he covers his nose and mouth after he accidentally hits himself in the face at :20. Otherwise, it's hard to see Charlie when he is the Tramp and vice versa.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Yess, also the 0:36
Nice 👍
Chaplin...😍😍😍
1
373648936202208347
7
El mejor cómico de la historia cinematográfica, eterno!!!!
Pre sound film was shot at 16 - 18 FPS. By c. 1925 ALL Hollywood footage was shot at 24 FPS. Why in the name of Sam Snead can they not play this restored footage at the correct speed?! The myth that silent movies are supposed to be over-speed is a myth from the 1960s revival of silent movies, shot at 16 - 18 FPS. During the 1960s, original 16- 18 FPS theatre prints were played at 24 FPS on modern projectors (which could have easily been slowed down). Ugh.
Groucho Marx said of Chaplin, "The best damn'd ballet dancer I ever saw."
If you see ANY Chaplin flick that seems to be at an abnormally fast speed, you are NOT seeing the art that Charles Chaplin carefully crafted and intended to be his product.
It's curious that silent Laurel and Hardy films are seldom played at the wrong speed.
Many great film works have been visually restored without thought of the correct speed! We also have this problem with phonograph records. No two electric motors move the same. This is why it was necessary to create a SMPTE tone to synchronise motion picture sound. When analogue film is shot today, the sound synchronisation technique remains the same as it was in 1928.
Today, when old Jazz is transferred from disc, the speed is assumed for at least 90% of the cases. Correct restoration of this music sets the speed so that the playback matches the key in which the piece was recorded. E.g., There is no key between A and Bb that an orchestra with a piano and horns could have intentionally played. Just because the label says "78 RPM" does not mean that it IS 78 RPM. 78 RPM was only the standard after c. 1925 when electric recording was invented. 80 RPM was the standard speed for Edison Diamond Discs and many other records. Lateral or vertical cut? Until RCA/Western Electric created the first electric recording studio, c. 1924. there were few standards.
FILM: Even when sound was recorded directly to optical stripe (in the 1950s, this became "mag", By c. 1955, small Nagra reel to reel tape machines were used -all the way into the digital age. Nagras are famous machines of superior quality). When analogue film is used today, the process remains the same. Sound is recorded first to a Nagra with a SMPTE tone from the camera for synchronisation.
C. 1949, after initial sound recording on the set, the sound was transferred to "mag:, which is simply standard film stock, but coated with a magnetic layer rather than light sensitive silver oxide emulsion. Mag is still in use today for analogue film.
What's odd is that, today, MANY motion picture are being shot direct to digital (no problem) and afterwards being transferred to film stock. Perhaps, this is done to accommodate the remaining theatres with mechanical projectors? Digital cameras are now capable of duplicating the same look of analogue film.
There is nothing worse than watching Buster Keaton, Clara Bow, Harry Langdon, Edna Purviance, Douglas Fairbanks, Mabel Normand, Fatty Arbuckle, The Gish Sisters, Mack Swain, etc., moving like cartoon characters of themselves. It is necessary to speed up silent film to make it "better". it is sacrilege to do this to such great art.
Yes, Laurel and Hardy ARE poetry in motion. I laugh at them, -and Chaplin, but more often I shed a quiet tear of amazement; awestruck at the genius of people who could move their bodies to express any plot, emotion or communication. All, seemingly, without effort. I am a musicians, but the rest of my body is useless. How some people can move to communicate overwhelms me. To speed them up, often TWICE as fast, is hideous. We have so few true American indigenous art forms.
We have Jazz, Baseball and The Movies. Why must we attempt to 'make them better'? Billie Holiday and Duke Ellington in the correct key, Charlie Chaplin moving at normal speed. Is that too much to ask?
Americans should take better care of their art. America has bested the world in Film, Jazz and Baseball, -and all in only 100 years. From Scott Joplin and Eubie Blake's delicate Ragtime to Billie Holiday's "No Ragrets", to Duke Ellington's 1940-42 Blanton / Webster band, -it all occurs in less than 60 years!
In Europe, the Renaissance required FAR more time. Is it any wonder that the French admire Jazz more than Americans? It's only a matter of time before The Yankees and the Red Sox will make Cricket test matches extinct.
This is at the studio at Labrea and Sunset
The studio is now The Jim Henson studios.
Louisa H with a goofy looking Kermit The frog on top of it 🙄🙄
@@navidpey194 lol, too true 🤣🤣
Legende
I love Mr Charlie 😘😂👍👍😁
what happen if charlie chaplin live in present days
😘😘😘😘😘
Mr. Chaplin, what are you so busy about?
I don’t know they had blooper back in the Days of silent movies!
Just found out he married a 17 year old when he was in his 50s idk how to feel oop-
Very smart indeed
👍👍👍👍👍👍
♥️
I love this movie
Bu adama bayılıyorum ya
Nice but why it was so short
Short but free!
Egon 151 that is true
Does anyone know the name of the first song
I love this! Such style! My big question is where are the tramps costumes today? 🤔🤔
An original Tramp costume from our archives is on display at Chaplin's World, the museum at his former home in Corsier-sur-Vevey: facebook.com/CharlieChaplinOfficial/photos/a.955829134475988/1068314343227466/?type=3&theater
@@TheChaplinFilms
❤
Super thanks to charle chappies of smile in face
周星馳 卓別林，20世紀兩大喜劇之王
Hancurrrr
He later built a pool where he was standing on the grass
How to make movie
You are not telling me this is the same person
Lik
Pour ceux qui peuvent c'est avec émotion que l'on visite sa.propriete a Vevey en Suisse
Moments extraordinaire dans un cadre merveilleux scénographie fabuleuse studio grandeur nature
Je n'ai qu'une envie y retourner
Pour vous donner une idée sur le site World Chaplin
First comment bro p
"How to make movies"
Ccvgģtŕ
Bahut acche
2024...for many times ago..
I love his films :-D🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷
وين العرب 🤔😂✌🇮🇶🇮🇶
موجودين
معاك
Cũ quá
Veanlo en x 0.75 de velocidad, de nada.
1:19
So hitler wanted to look like charlie chaplin....
Да самом деле странно..
то время у них шубы для стены пластика был ..и дверь металлически это в30 годах...
А руссия до сих пор отсталый оказывается ...
😂o,my😂😂😂😂😂😂😂👍👍👍
Sometimes I wonder: did CC purposefully dirty his hands when in costume to appear more like a tramp?
Yes he did, in reality he was a very clean man, OCD in fact, as he was known for having many, many baths a day sometimes.
Now THAT is interesting. I don't recall CC mentioning taking several baths a day in his memoir, but I'll be sure to keep my eye out for it the next time I read his book
I am sure i have read that somewhere, i just tried googling it to give you a link but can't find it... I'll look out for it again myself 🙂
@@louisah1968 Just don't strain yourself trying to find the answer haha We'll find out eventually
@@WaltsNephew well considering I've been made redundant I've had more important things on my mind since then lol 😉😂
😂😇🤣😂🤣🤣😍
पागलों का सरदार ❤❤😂😂😂
don't upload videos anymore
Вам
😂😂😂
So.short 😞
Short but free!
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
ok?
❤
0:52