Never make science man angry or sad Happy science man make fast medicine and everyone is happy Angry science man too busy shouting and not enough time for science work Sad science man just stay in bed all day crying
“We'll all say we've never felt more connected to our purpose as scientists and physicians and drug developers. This is what we've been preparing for. We may not have known it but it's been a call to action that's energized us We're also wondering how can we ever go back to the normal pace of work This is something special and it's a moment where science comes to the rescue of society The question is next year, let's replicate this for patients with other diseases”
- Daniel Skovronksy, the Chief Scientific Officer of Eli Lilly Best quote ever. Thanks so much for all the health care providers and scientists who worked long hours in 2020 to make a difference in the world.
Speaking as a Biology teacher and pharmacy technician (and human during Covid-19 pandemic), I just want to say thank you, SciShow, for this interview. It's exciting, inspiring, and hopeful!
Thank you Dr. Daniel Skovronksy, thank you so much. And thank you Hank and Alexis for all you have been doing to bring us the facts. Its so refreshing to see people, like the three of you, just helping and being compassionate human beings, like we all should be. If only we could all come together like all the researchers around the world have done.
What a refreshing interview. Good job all round guys. Love the fact that companies and people learned how to work together instead of in competition with each other. Win win through collaboration.
i personally take taltz, made by eli lily, and it has turned a horrible autoimmune skin condition into almost nothing at all.. i believe in this company
I take Taltz too, and it eliminated my skin condition in hours - I watched it recede and fade. The only side effect is the injection site is sore for a day or two.
Dr. Daniel Skovronsky you give me hope. I am so glad to see a man of your generation realizing that people need what you do more than your stockholders need their profits. Thank you so much.
I have friends in England who regularly see the nurse who is assigned to their neighborhood for a lot of things that I would have to go in to see my doctor or psychologist to have addressed. The nurse cuts down on how many people need to see a doctor, the patient doesn’t have to leave their homes, and there’s a healthcare provider who understands their neighborhood and what resources they need and are close by. I’m hopeful that we will move towards universal coverage and smarter ways to organize healthcare for all of us!
I've been blown away with the collaboration and communication between companies, labs, countries, governments and more. I hope the groundwork that's been laid facilitates future such cooperation He does make an excellent point about 2020; we ARE lucky in that sense.
What I wanted to say .. in answer to "will things be different in the future". Yes. We needed a covid19 panic situation because for so many years we've been working in a post war way; the fifties and early sixties set up the paradigms for our science. Change like this requires a global pandemic - where we learn new things and ways of being. There will be a push back, from those who long for the 'good ol' days' but small leaps will mean, as a world, we have started to, well and truly, get out of the 20th century and into the 21st. Yay!! Science. Thanks to SciShow for showing this. Thanks so much
Who killed Bambi? Runours are other names proposed were: Prematureblindalley.... Justthinkaboutthemoney... Whocaresjustdonttakeityourself... and my favourite LillyLies
@@noreasonwhynot4548 Have you not been paying attention to what's been going on? These people know more than you ever will and they're trying to close that gap. Try listening to the experts instead of random "articles" on poorly-constructed conspiracy theories.
No drug should ever be given a human name... Looking at you, makers of Allegra 😑 or Mirena... How wonderful would it be to share a name with a birth control.
Bamlanivimab still has a lot of downsides. Cant use it on very sick patients (makes things worse). Its only allowed to be used on mild cases with risk for severe desease progression (ie ppl over 65yrs).
They are the people most likely to wind up in the hospital simply due to their pre-existing issues. The case for this is by keeping patients from winding up in the ICU, it clears personnel for treating those who do progress to worse outcomes. You can't win a football game with just a quarterback or just a wide receiver. You need the offensive linemen and defensive squad as well.
Excellent work. Using what you know with all you have and being totally motivated can do great things. The changes we have made can be scary but some of the changes that are to come are simply amazing. Here's to a hopeful future. 🍻 🥂
I think the title is doing you a bit of a disservice on this video. RUclips is truncating the title after the "?" for the thumbnail and I assumed it was your typical short format video. The video contains much more than the answer to this question!
I certainly hope everyone doubting these treatments can see this. He broke it down simply and efficiently as to why they were able to get to it so fast
@@MrGeekGamer retroviruses are significantly more difficult to work with. Please do a little research of your own on the subject as I'm not a professional or a doctor but after doing my own research online and reading various studies I think I can understand that much
@@CTP909 Cool, cool. So why haven't they cured the common flu yet? That's not a retrovirus and is, in fact, a coronavirus that kills people. Cure it forever in nine months.
I heard an interview with a german sientist about these kinds of medicines back in spring (I think it was in May). Back then they said it would be taking until 2022 to develop this stuff. I'm really impressed
A Canadian company, AbCellera Labs, developed Bamlanivimab, and it has been approved by Health Canada. Canada spent $175 million on research and development for a Vancouver company to develop it. Since a Conservative Prime Minister sold Connaught Labs in the 1980s, we no longer have the ability to produce our own vaccines.
I love the conversation of how COVID will change medicine. Every tragedy is an opportunity to improve humanity. Ideally, we don’t have to have loss to have innovation, but as the saying goes, “necessity is the mother of invention.”
~8:20 Re: convalescent plasma --It also has clotting factors in it so giving it to people late in the disease can cause strokes and heart attacks etc.. You need to give it the day after you are diagnosed while you still have viruses to fight off. The Bamlanivimab-type drugs do not have these factors in it BTW.
I would be interested in knowing how they are tackling the various strains of the virus, in various regions. How are they designing vaccines that treat all the multiple strains?
Amazing explanation, lovely to hear more about the covid fight. Great to see the power of science. I loved how there were images helping explain the topics. The only meh thing is the audio, the interviewee could've (maybe) used his phone to record and send a better audio than the recording, it helps a lot people with hearing disabilities or people with English as a second language Love y'all though
The telemedicine development seems really great for some things, but it was really terrible for me. I had a throat infection which going to the doctor would have solved within two weeks, but because some of the symptoms for a throat infection are the same as those for COVID, doctors wouldn't let me in to see me. We tried over the phone but obviously it's hard to shine a torch down someone's throat and diagnose an infection over the phone. So, it ended up taking so long to get diagnosed and so long to get antibiotics that the infection took a real toll on my lungs, and over three months later I'm still taking extra medication to breathe. So, telemedicine: pros and cons.
Does the one person the gave their cells being compensated for this because your company will be profiting off of this?! This reminds me of Henrietta Lacks
Probably a bit different situation from HeLa. In this case, what they do is they identify their target antigen from the patient, take the best one and produce it in other cells (hybridoma cells or CHO cells). They probably asked the patient to sign consent first when taking their blood. Hence, they took that info but the rest is their own techniques. In case of HeLa, the doctor take it from the corpse of a person without her or her family consent. Grow them and distribute them for research. They still selling HeLa on the internet per vial is around $500 (containing a million frozen cells) though has some variations.
thankyou for humanizing the people behind the fight for a cure. hopefully, when this is all over, someone will make a documentary about them so we can all understand what a massive undertaking this was
Do generic medicines follow those same naming rules? Or is it the PR department then? Because they're always pretty different, despite the fact that mixing them up is no big deal. And it also means that you basically have to remember two names for medicines, as patients will oftentimes just write the one they get the prescription for in their history. And like Zoloft vs Sertaline and Dexmethlephenidate vs Focalin. If these names are communicating information, they're not communicating the same info.
Generics are often just named as the chemical name. Like I take dupixent, which is the brand name for dupilumab, a different monoclonal antibody. Or like, the generic for adderall is mixed amphetamine salts. Sentra line is the chemical name of Zoloft. Sometimes there are other brand names for different formulations of a drug (see Quillivant). But, doctors or people who deal with them will usually know what it is for common ones, or can look it up. Like, I work in behavioral health. If a parent tells me their kid takes quillivant for adhd, I know that’s a formulation of Ritalin, which is the chemical methylphenidate. Or vyvanse is an ampethamine, so it would act similar to others in that group. Before I knew, I just lo9ed it up.
Yes and no. There are nomenclature guidelines, but older drugs were subject to older/nonexistent guidelines. The simpler the molecule, the more likely it's just the chemical name. Some are named per class (-statin suffix for HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, -ol suffix for beta blockers, -pril suffix ACE inhibitors). Note that generic names aren't self-evident. You'd need the IUPAC name that really describes what it is. Also, generic medicin =/= generic names for drugs. The first is about patent law (can still hold a copyrighted brand name), the latter is about nomenclature. example: brand name: lipitor generic name: atorvastatin. IUPAC name: (3R,5R)-7-[2-(4-fluorophenyl)-3-phenyl-4-(phenylcarbamoyl)-5-propan-2-ylpyrrol-1-yl]-3,5-dihydroxyheptanoic acid hence why we use generic drug names.
I would like to have heard him talk about whether or not he thought his employer's business model created a bias in medicine in general towards treating people with drugs. And also, is that a problem? And how might the way we pay for things be changed to reduce this effect, if it exists. The other questions you asked him were interesting.
we just got this at our hospital, literally refer to is just as bam. 'where's the bam?' 'bam infusion.' BAM!
What happened to Bobby? Bobby got bammed.
A proper superhero term - can see the comic-book style color-explosion around the word POW! BAM! :D
There was a celebrity chef named Emeril Lagasse that like to "kick things up a notch" on his cooking show by adding some fresh spices, BAM!! LoL!!
When will it be available to cancer and immunocompromised patients? Or is it already?
Thank you for your work
Hank starting off strong by flirting with the important science man.
Never make science man angry or sad
Happy science man make fast medicine and everyone is happy
Angry science man too busy shouting and not enough time for science work
Sad science man just stay in bed all day crying
And never make science man mad... mad science man bad for world.
I would like to thank you and your colleagues for the work you're doing Dr. Skovronsky.
I had this drug it worked well and i have CF and just got over cancer on 12/26/19 and it helped alot when i got it. Tell him thanks for me
Thank you so much
If your wondering what type of cancer it was breast cancer. And when i was younger i had bone cancer in 2008 9r 2009
It's always nice to hear a story like this.
Many Blessings to you!
I have cancer again i got it confirmed in September 2022 i am doing good so far
“We'll all say we've never felt more connected to our purpose as scientists and physicians and drug developers.
This is what we've been preparing for. We may not have known it but it's been a call to action that's energized us
We're also wondering how can we ever go back to the normal pace of work
This is something special and it's a moment where science comes to the rescue of society
The question is next year, let's replicate this for patients with other diseases”
- Daniel Skovronksy, the Chief Scientific Officer of Eli Lilly
Best quote ever.
Thanks so much for all the health care providers and scientists who worked long hours in 2020 to make a difference in the world.
Speaking as a Biology teacher and pharmacy technician (and human during Covid-19 pandemic), I just want to say thank you, SciShow, for this interview. It's exciting, inspiring, and hopeful!
Much appreciated! Glad you like it as we'd like to do more stuff like this.
"It's exciting, inspiring, and hopeful!" But none of that we must remember is actual science, it is human feelings.
"It's exciting, inspiring, and hopeful!... purchases Eli Lilly shares...
@@noreasonwhynot4548 I would argue that there is some significant science behind emotion!
@@SciShow Not sure if you guys will see this, but I'd love to see more interviews like this! Or more SciShow Talk Show!
Chief of science
In charge of any sciencing going on
I got like four seconds into this interview before I totally forgot what is job titles. I'M A PROFESSIONAL.
If some one is chief of science its Sir Martyn Poliakoff or maybe he is the incarnation of science :)
When someone stops having a common job title and starts bring a chief you know he's important. Probably chose his own titel.
Thank you Dr. Daniel Skovronksy, thank you so much. And thank you Hank and Alexis for all you have been doing to bring us the facts. Its so refreshing to see people, like the three of you, just helping and being compassionate human beings, like we all should be. If only we could all come together like all the researchers around the world have done.
Thank YOU! The kind words really made my day. Thank you for joining us as we tried a new thing. 🙂
What a refreshing interview. Good job all round guys. Love the fact that companies and people learned how to work together instead of in competition with each other. Win win through collaboration.
+
i personally take taltz, made by eli lily, and it has turned a horrible autoimmune skin condition into almost nothing at all.. i believe in this company
A family friend did research for taltz. I'm screenshotting to show him. ❤️
@@moonshot9056 he's a high quality person!
I take Taltz too, and it eliminated my skin condition in hours - I watched it recede and fade. The only side effect is the injection site is sore for a day or two.
@@ellie_m_j tell him/her thank you
@@Adereterial yes. Ill take a little soreness over psoriasis on half my body any day
If the universal flu vaccine isn't called "Ramalamadingdong" I'll be upset.
ding a ding dang my dang a long ling long
Ramalamadingdongvimab
😂
Thank you Mr. Scientist at Lilly.... I got this Bam treatment... I feel great!
Dr. Daniel Skovronsky you give me hope. I am so glad to see a man of your generation realizing that people need what you do more than your stockholders need their profits. Thank you so much.
Imagine if it was called after the patient the original antibody came from. We'd all be infusing Jeff or something.
I have friends in England who regularly see the nurse who is assigned to their neighborhood for a lot of things that I would have to go in to see my doctor or psychologist to have addressed. The nurse cuts down on how many people need to see a doctor, the patient doesn’t have to leave their homes, and there’s a healthcare provider who understands their neighborhood and what resources they need and are close by. I’m hopeful that we will move towards universal coverage and smarter ways to organize healthcare for all of us!
Don't tell me Bamla Nivimab doesn't sound like a character from the Mandalorian.
I love this video. I would definitely like to see more like these when the topic and situation warrant.
Thank you to everyone involved.
Thanks for showing the interview. This was fascinating.
This is a relevant world class interview. I learned.
As a person with cancer and asthma, I can't in words describe how excited I'm about the process recently made this year in the lab.
Excellent video Hank, Alexis and team. Very good conversation with Lily's CSO. You have raised the bar
I wish there were 10 like buttons I could smash! Great job landing the interview and it was very interesting to listen to! 110/10!
It's like they wanted to create a palindromic name but messed it up on purpose just to frustrate me specifically.
I've been blown away with the collaboration and communication between companies, labs, countries, governments and more. I hope the groundwork that's been laid facilitates future such cooperation
He does make an excellent point about 2020; we ARE lucky in that sense.
Someone who should be aware that we're just going to call it 'bam".
wham bam thank you ma'am?
bam? damn.
BAM and the bug is gone
HOME INFUSION?!?!?! HOLY CRAP!!!! This is a massive game changer! This will change medicine enormously!
What a genuinely likable dude. Great job.
Science is so cool. Thanks for shedding light on an relevant topic
This is incredible!! Thank you for this information.
amazing interview scishow guys, thank you! clear explanations, clearly edited - and both fascinating and heartening :)
What I wanted to say .. in answer to "will things be different in the future". Yes. We needed a covid19 panic situation because for so many years we've been working in a post war way; the fifties and early sixties set up the paradigms for our science. Change like this requires a global pandemic - where we learn new things and ways of being. There will be a push back, from those who long for the 'good ol' days' but small leaps will mean, as a world, we have started to, well and truly, get out of the 20th century and into the 21st.
Yay!! Science. Thanks to SciShow for showing this. Thanks so much
Should've named it Bambi. Easier to read, easier to say, and easier to associate with a character who had a happy ending in the end
But i will fear my mother dying so no thank you
Do you want them to get Disney-sued? Because that's how you get Disney-sued.
Who killed Bambi?
Runours are other names proposed were: Prematureblindalley.... Justthinkaboutthemoney... Whocaresjustdonttakeityourself... and my favourite LillyLies
@@noreasonwhynot4548 Have you not been paying attention to what's been going on? These people know more than you ever will and they're trying to close that gap. Try listening to the experts instead of random "articles" on poorly-constructed conspiracy theories.
No drug should ever be given a human name... Looking at you, makers of Allegra 😑 or Mirena... How wonderful would it be to share a name with a birth control.
Maybe your best video ever! Everybody needs to watch this.
Thanks SciShow for this excellent interview!
What a lovely interview. Thank you
That was outstanding! Do more interviews like this!
Excellent and very informative video, thank you, all involved!
I'm sorry, he is the chief of science now
Don't be sorry.
Thank you, SciShow team for being awesome.
Bamlanivimab still has a lot of downsides. Cant use it on very sick patients (makes things worse). Its only allowed to be used on mild cases with risk for severe desease progression (ie ppl over 65yrs).
They are the people most likely to wind up in the hospital simply due to their pre-existing issues. The case for this is by keeping patients from winding up in the ICU, it clears personnel for treating those who do progress to worse outcomes. You can't win a football game with just a quarterback or just a wide receiver. You need the offensive linemen and defensive squad as well.
Yesssss!!!! SciShow TalkShow is back!!!! :P
Yeah! Not super consistent, yet, but we have another video like this coming out next week too!
@@SciShow That's amaizing! I'm looking forward to it.
More like this on SciShow please.
Glad you liked it! We have another interview video coming next week!
Excellent work. Using what you know with all you have and being totally motivated can do great things. The changes we have made can be scary but some of the changes that are to come are simply amazing. Here's to a hopeful future. 🍻 🥂
So interesting, thanks for posting!
Thank you for watching!
I really appreciated this interview.
Great interview and great information. Thank you guys!
I think the title is doing you a bit of a disservice on this video. RUclips is truncating the title after the "?" for the thumbnail and I assumed it was your typical short format video. The video contains much more than the answer to this question!
Feels like SciShow Talk Show again!! :)
Yess! I miss the talk shows so much
I certainly hope everyone doubting these treatments can see this. He broke it down simply and efficiently as to why they were able to get to it so fast
So why didn't they cure HIV already?
@@MrGeekGamer retroviruses are significantly more difficult to work with. Please do a little research of your own on the subject as I'm not a professional or a doctor but after doing my own research online and reading various studies I think I can understand that much
This wasn't about the vaccines tbh, but the people aren't that different.
@@CTP909 Cool, cool. So why haven't they cured the common flu yet?
That's not a retrovirus and is, in fact, a coronavirus that kills people. Cure it forever in nine months.
I heard an interview with a german sientist about these kinds of medicines back in spring (I think it was in May). Back then they said it would be taking until 2022 to develop this stuff. I'm really impressed
The auto generated texts attempts at these names are hilarious :D. @ 2:45
> family nevermind< and > bear sit in it
Fantastic program!
A Canadian company, AbCellera Labs, developed Bamlanivimab, and it has been approved by Health Canada. Canada spent $175 million on research and development for a Vancouver company to develop it.
Since a Conservative Prime Minister sold Connaught Labs in the 1980s, we no longer have the ability to produce our own vaccines.
Thanks i knew about Michael Ross! He was my professor in Oxford and told us about Vectra!
Very interesting and helpful interview. Thanks for posting it.
Thank you for this interview! It was very informative and interesting.
Spelled backwards it sounds like "BAM Ivana Lamb!"
Excellent interview!
Nice to have more hope.
"Trulicity" sounds like it should be the name of the latest "teen drama," on the WB! =)
Ram-a-lamb-a-ding-dong!
Love seeing your bookshelf up close! Rosewater was good
The antibodies are the most interesting brew i have seen in one of those vats. Looks like a brewery for beer or liquor
I love the conversation of how COVID will change medicine. Every tragedy is an opportunity to improve humanity. Ideally, we don’t have to have loss to have innovation, but as the saying goes, “necessity is the mother of invention.”
~8:20 Re: convalescent plasma --It also has clotting factors in it so giving it to people late in the disease can cause strokes and heart attacks etc.. You need to give it the day after you are diagnosed while you still have viruses to fight off. The Bamlanivimab-type drugs do not have these factors in it BTW.
"We'll never be complacent again." Lol, I'm guessing the same thing was said in 1918.
So true.
I would be interested in knowing how they are tackling the various strains of the virus, in various regions. How are they designing vaccines that treat all the multiple strains?
Amazing explanation, lovely to hear more about the covid fight. Great to see the power of science.
I loved how there were images helping explain the topics.
The only meh thing is the audio, the interviewee could've (maybe) used his phone to record and send a better audio than the recording, it helps a lot people with hearing disabilities or people with English as a second language
Love y'all though
home infusion nurses seem like the best way to administer this to avoid spread.
Edit:oh you talk about the home infusion nurses. 👍
I love the idea they just get the office cat to walk across the keyboard and that’s the name.
This is very informative. Thank you.
This was amazing thank you
I thought "bamlanivimab" was a palindrome and tried reading it backwards a few times
Yup, tried that too.
Ha, I just suggested they should have gone with bamlanivinalmab before I saw your comment.😊
Please, work on more/better medicine for CRPS and include Type II for clinical trials!
They are. But... under normal and necessary ethical constraints and scientific norms. So it will take time...
Hmmm, 28 minutes... Not sure if I want to watch all that.
28 minutes later: I'm glad I watched all that. ☺
I’ll be getting this next week
The telemedicine development seems really great for some things, but it was really terrible for me. I had a throat infection which going to the doctor would have solved within two weeks, but because some of the symptoms for a throat infection are the same as those for COVID, doctors wouldn't let me in to see me. We tried over the phone but obviously it's hard to shine a torch down someone's throat and diagnose an infection over the phone. So, it ended up taking so long to get diagnosed and so long to get antibiotics that the infection took a real toll on my lungs, and over three months later I'm still taking extra medication to breathe. So, telemedicine: pros and cons.
This guy is brilliant. Makes you wonder how better off we'd be if scientifics would have had the support of government officials, especially in US.
There is a Banksy on a pillow lurking in the background.
Indeed!
thank you
So what I'm hearing is that we finally have a treatment but no way to mobilize it?
😭
That was a great interview
Thanks!
great interview
Going back to house calls I like it
Does the one person the gave their cells being compensated for this because your company will be profiting off of this?! This reminds me of Henrietta Lacks
My first thought as well.I know they worked hard on this but they couldn't have done any of it without that patient.
Probably a bit different situation from HeLa. In this case, what they do is they identify their target antigen from the patient, take the best one and produce it in other cells (hybridoma cells or CHO cells). They probably asked the patient to sign consent first when taking their blood. Hence, they took that info but the rest is their own techniques.
In case of HeLa, the doctor take it from the corpse of a person without her or her family consent. Grow them and distribute them for research. They still selling HeLa on the internet per vial is around $500 (containing a million frozen cells) though has some variations.
2020 was a bad year, but the science was so good! 👏👏👏
So - SCIENCE to the rescue! Excellent show!
If I ever need this, please play a voice clip of Emeril Lagasse when you give it to me.
Nice video
SciShow asking the real questions
Very interesting video 😊
That is literally the best name for a drug ever
I like it more and more every day...
@@SciShow Better than Thalidomide?
What about Anti-Depressant? LOL
@@noreasonwhynot4548 what the hell are you saying?
@@cheeseburgermonkey7104 Saying?
thankyou for humanizing the people behind the fight for a cure.
hopefully, when this is all over, someone will make a documentary about them so we can all understand what a massive undertaking this was
Do generic medicines follow those same naming rules? Or is it the PR department then? Because they're always pretty different, despite the fact that mixing them up is no big deal. And it also means that you basically have to remember two names for medicines, as patients will oftentimes just write the one they get the prescription for in their history. And like Zoloft vs Sertaline and Dexmethlephenidate vs Focalin. If these names are communicating information, they're not communicating the same info.
Generics are often just named as the chemical name. Like I take dupixent, which is the brand name for dupilumab, a different monoclonal antibody. Or like, the generic for adderall is mixed amphetamine salts. Sentra line is the chemical name of Zoloft. Sometimes there are other brand names for different formulations of a drug (see Quillivant). But, doctors or people who deal with them will usually know what it is for common ones, or can look it up. Like, I work in behavioral health. If a parent tells me their kid takes quillivant for adhd, I know that’s a formulation of Ritalin, which is the chemical methylphenidate. Or vyvanse is an ampethamine, so it would act similar to others in that group. Before I knew, I just lo9ed it up.
Yes and no. There are nomenclature guidelines, but older drugs were subject to older/nonexistent guidelines. The simpler the molecule, the more likely it's just the chemical name. Some are named per class (-statin suffix for HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, -ol suffix for beta blockers, -pril suffix ACE inhibitors). Note that generic names aren't self-evident. You'd need the IUPAC name that really describes what it is.
Also, generic medicin =/= generic names for drugs. The first is about patent law (can still hold a copyrighted brand name), the latter is about nomenclature.
example:
brand name: lipitor
generic name: atorvastatin.
IUPAC name: (3R,5R)-7-[2-(4-fluorophenyl)-3-phenyl-4-(phenylcarbamoyl)-5-propan-2-ylpyrrol-1-yl]-3,5-dihydroxyheptanoic acid
hence why we use generic drug names.
somewhere between Nodnol and Oriac is Bamlanivimab
I would like to have heard him talk about whether or not he thought his employer's business model created a bias in medicine in general towards treating people with drugs. And also, is that a problem? And how might the way we pay for things be changed to reduce this effect, if it exists.
The other questions you asked him were interesting.
I know it's off-topic, but is that a banjolin hiding there behind you Hank? Noice!
Wow
I want to get involved in home infusions!!
MandoBanjo! Banjolin! Squirrel! Sorry, I got distracted..... Thanks for the video. Who plays the instrument?