Tough loss for agassi in US open 2004 & 2005 where he could win GS but eventually he found federer at opposite end & fed was too strong in his prime years. Agassi's career longevity from late 80's to early 2000's is really phenomenal. He was truly founder of modern day tennis.
The courts were also a lot quicker back here, by 2008 and beyond the hard courts were so much slower. It no longer suited guys with a big serve, volleying or a one handed backhand as winners were far fewer but rallies are protracted so errors rack up
1:42:18: I think this is the David Foster Wallace point as described in his NYT article "Roger Federer as Religious Experience". DFW was slightly incorrect in that he described Federer as hitting a defensive slice, and Agassi being passed at the net.
Love this match one of my all time favorite to watch over and over and Agassi even LOST. I hated it when Agassi lost, but this match was one of the highest quality I have ever seen.
Nadal fan however Federer greatest of all time you couldn’t touch him in his prime only Rafa on Clay , Fed. Older than that arrogant Joker , joker only 2 more slams and 4 years playing longer cause Fed. Older and had physical injuries. Federer’s greatness was displayed when he beat that egotist fake humility Djokovic at the French Open at Djokovic’s absolute prime
Back when the courts used to be peppy/lively and rewarded attacking style of Tennis!! Now they are dead, it's become more of a slugfest on who makes mistake first and no returns for attacking style of tennis!!
I’m a big fan Federer fan, but I feel like this particular victory isn’t as amazing as everyone makes it out to be. He was defending his title against 35 year old Agassi, who was not only 11 years his senior, but dealing with an ailing back that compromised his mobility. Yet, he pushed Federer to the limit and really made him earn his 2nd set win. On the final set, it was obvious that Agassi was gassed out. When taking these variables into account, Agassi’s performance was far more impressive than Federer’s victory over him.
Thats whay in top spin 4 federer have the better forehand in the game, because the prime federer when hit the ball with the forehand, jesus man, what a strike
American audience always so loud, and it's also unclassy to yell "Go Agassi" or whatever when the opponent is serving. In other turnaments, it's much quieter when the players serve and prepare to serve, it's something you really notice when watching a lot of different matches.
99% of the audience would agree with you. It’s normally a few idiots that yell during both players’ serves in this match. Also matches in Madrid and elsewhere get just as loud and yelling during serves happen as well. Your biases just have you think otherwise.
Prime Federer 04-09. Only thing that can compete is Novak 2011-2016 and I think even Novaks run is 2nd to Fed. Never seen anything like prime Federer. It’s a shame it had to end. Now Novak is gonna reach 30 slams since fed is gone and Nadal is on his way out
@@fg92626yes, even the best players have years that they didn’t do as well. They’re all human. Fed, Nadal, djoker, all had/have off years. Just like Sampras, Agassi, etc. Such a boring argument
@@dewman7477 2011-2016 was the golden era of tennis so strong competition Murray and Wawrinka are all time greats but wait how many GS Federer has in this era?
Fedederer beats 33+ age multiple grand slam champion great legend agassi in 2004-2005 grand slam then djokoturd fans be like federer had weak era and just beating old agassi But when djoko the one beating 33+ age old federer then all of a sudden djoko was goat lol 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@garethcole5281 dude... you're so funny. where i go ... you go... lol. I will at some point. just keep practising what we talked about before and you'll get the flow or at least some of it.
It’s funny how many different change overs of sport brand sponsors these tennis players have. I feel like I’ve seen Agassi switch between adidas and Nike over and over through his career. Lol
Just felt like federer didn't work as hard after 2009 to improve his game to allow djokovic and nadal to catch him up...personally if he worked as hard as djokovic or even djokers mentally federer could've gotten 30 slams
Because medical technology has evolved, and tennis is now like formula 1 in the sense that a player is part of a large team whose job it is to manage the player as if he's a piece of technology himself. Plus of course, Djokovic evolved his style for maximum efficiency.... in comparison to Murray, who tried to compensate for an unnatural forehand technique and lack of power by running everything down.
1:42:40 Kinda funny how they talk about Lance Armstong and that he knows what effort is needed in sport. He lost all his titles because he was doped. It was revealed in 2012.
i was so disappontment after this match, but my boy djokovic makes the perect revenge for me 10 years later by the us open final 2015 exact on the same way like in this match...DESTINY FOR ME AS A agassi and djokovic fan
ofc he would. but thats because he knows his own game and weaknesses. 05 federer is far more athletic and his constant aggression and the potency of his serve + 1 would beat 15 federer for sure
@@joselivia3998 y eso que tiene que ver, y Federer no es que ha perdido todos sus encuentros con Novak, de hecho el ultimo partido jugado entre ellos lo gano Federer, REVISA soquete 🤣
@@meitoli Ya empezastes con los adjetivos, Nole ya pierde de flojera con Federer, pero los 40 - 15 van hacer para ponerlos en cuadros para toda la vida., lloron.
Agassi’s career grand slam is certainly far more impressive than any of theirs because he got his in a time where surfaces were actually different from each other
Tough loss for agassi in US open 2004 & 2005 where he could win GS but eventually he found federer at opposite end & fed was too strong in his prime years. Agassi's career longevity from late 80's to early 2000's is really phenomenal. He was truly founder of modern day tennis.
Spot on, spot on, DJOKOVIC took the baton
Lendl was the father of modern tennis and widely acknowledged as such.
@@rupinjeremiah9589 lendl followed by Pete Sampras
back when federer speed and explosiveness was at its best
compared to grandpa Agassi 🙂
@@fg92626why old Agassi excuse?
@@fg92626you realize Federer was same age or older as Agassi in 2014-2021 lol 😂 hypocrisy
The courts were also a lot quicker back here, by 2008 and beyond the hard courts were so much slower. It no longer suited guys with a big serve, volleying or a one handed backhand as winners were far fewer but rallies are protracted so errors rack up
Bravo US Open - first year of the blue courts, thank goodness. Young Federer against Old Agassi, beautiful serves all around.
There is not a player alive that can beat this version of Federer
40:45 That rally shows the greatness and variability of Agassi´s Backhand!
1:42:18: I think this is the David Foster Wallace point as described in his NYT article "Roger Federer as Religious Experience". DFW was slightly incorrect in that he described Federer as hitting a defensive slice, and Agassi being passed at the net.
Love this match one of my all time favorite to watch over and over and Agassi even LOST. I hated it when Agassi lost, but this match was one of the highest quality I have ever seen.
As an Agassi fan I so much wanted him to win. But this match shows his capabilities
Young Fed vs Retiring Agassi, and now Fed retired. Life’s a full circle :)
I’m lucky to have been born in their era.
1:42:25 The wizardous retreating forehand winner from Federer!
That is an impossible shot. In any era
@@z1az285and he kept doing many times🙂 for me none have ever or will ever play tennis like him
Back in the day when having an all-court game was fun to watch. 2 greats.
Although Djokovic has become more successful - Federer´s gameplay was always much more fun to watch!
Don't cry it's OK fedrer fan
@@karthiknetworking2415so stating an opinion is crying now? lol
Nadal fan however Federer greatest of all time you couldn’t touch him in his prime only Rafa on Clay , Fed.
Older than that arrogant Joker , joker only 2 more slams and 4 years playing longer cause Fed. Older and had physical injuries. Federer’s greatness was displayed when he beat that egotist fake humility Djokovic
at the French Open at Djokovic’s absolute prime
Back when the courts used to be peppy/lively and rewarded attacking style of Tennis!! Now they are dead, it's become more of a slugfest on who makes mistake first and no returns for attacking style of tennis!!
Thanks USTA.
Dude... Agassi Cracks the ball sooooo hard sometimes. he was old doing this stuff. lol
I’m a big fan Federer fan, but I feel like this particular victory isn’t as amazing as everyone makes it out to be. He was defending his title against 35 year old Agassi, who was not only 11 years his senior, but dealing with an ailing back that compromised his mobility.
Yet, he pushed Federer to the limit and really made him earn his 2nd set win. On the final set, it was obvious that Agassi was gassed out.
When taking these variables into account, Agassi’s performance was far more impressive than Federer’s victory over him.
I miss Andre
Federer ❤️
About time this was uploaded
Federer has the ability to raise his game and tectics during crucial periods.
Prime Federer was unbelievable
This was when Roger was still one of the boys, wearing what all the other Nike-sponsored pros where wearing and before the birth of the RF brand.
this is excellent film work.
Stilll...agassi forever my idol...great philantropist❤❤😊😊😊😊
20年以上一線級だもんなぁー。すごいこと。。。
Thats whay in top spin 4 federer have the better forehand in the game, because the prime federer when hit the ball with the forehand, jesus man, what a strike
American audience always so loud, and it's also unclassy to yell "Go Agassi" or whatever when the opponent is serving. In other turnaments, it's much quieter when the players serve and prepare to serve, it's something you really notice when watching a lot of different matches.
100%. I was getting really annoyed with the audience. Props to Fed for pulling it out against such a crowd
99% of the audience would agree with you. It’s normally a few idiots that yell during both players’ serves in this match.
Also matches in Madrid and elsewhere get just as loud and yelling during serves happen as well. Your biases just have you think otherwise.
we americans are loud! it's embarassing
Prime Federer 04-09. Only thing that can compete is Novak 2011-2016 and I think even Novaks run is 2nd to Fed. Never seen anything like prime Federer. It’s a shame it had to end. Now Novak is gonna reach 30 slams since fed is gone and Nadal is on his way out
prime Federer got spanked in AO/RG/Wimbledon in 2008 by teenagers
@@fg92626yes, even the best players have years that they didn’t do as well. They’re all human.
Fed, Nadal, djoker, all had/have off years. Just like Sampras, Agassi, etc.
Such a boring argument
@@travissmith2092 Fed beat Bagtadis,Philippusis,Hewiut,Gonzales,RodDick in his prime how can he do it?
@@fg92626Djokovic in 2011-2016 lost to Murray and Wawrinka two players Federer has better grand slam records against
@@dewman7477 2011-2016 was the golden era of tennis so strong competition Murray and Wawrinka are all time greats but wait how many GS Federer has in this era?
The commentator: the problem with Federer is he has a lot of strengths and no weaknesses. 😂.
It was Agassi himself Who said that
This match is uploaded by a random user on RUclips, how is it possible his quality is superior to this?
Since the HD coverage was done by a company other than the US Open themselves
At the end Fed let Andre win 1 final game. 6 -0 was just too much
Match exists in HD everywhere, and the source puts up a horrid 4:3 barely 720 image.
Was Rooting For Agassi to Win the Match but Federer Form was simply unplayable
Fedederer beats 33+ age multiple grand slam champion great legend agassi in 2004-2005 grand slam then djokoturd fans be like federer had weak era and just beating old agassi
But when djoko the one beating 33+ age old federer then all of a sudden djoko was goat lol 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Exactly these fans are hypocrites they contradict themselves with their own flawed logic bunch of idiots
Exactly
AGASS1 was injured by then.
Would love to see a face to face in 3 or 4 round.
This is probably the most mundane (?) crowd reaction of a Federer win. Shows you how much Agassi is loved there.
Federer’s backhand lol. What a great shot.
Agassi's backhand.... the most beautiful backhand you will ever see.... such a shame his backhand technique will not be carried forward.
Dude u need to make video of you hitting this backhand please
It's nice, but the most beautiful? First time I'm hearing that.
@@garethcole5281 dude... you're so funny. where i go ... you go... lol. I will at some point. just keep practising what we talked about before and you'll get the flow or at least some of it.
@@JD-jc8gp first time you're hearing that? LOL... this is the first time I'm hearing THIS.
@@OldSkoolLegend ok dude wil do
Agassi forever !!!!!!!!!!
1:52:58 "Luis Horna" 🟥⬜🟥
1:42:19
It’s funny how many different change overs of sport brand sponsors these tennis players have. I feel like I’ve seen Agassi switch between adidas and Nike over and over through his career. Lol
1:08:27 Marat Safin as the ball boy
No
11:41
This is prime Federer just before he had his ankle injury imo
Just felt like federer didn't work as hard after 2009 to improve his game to allow djokovic and nadal to catch him up...personally if he worked as hard as djokovic or even djokers mentally federer could've gotten 30 slams
Fed work hard, it just both Rafa and Novak just work a tad bit harder. Also, being a father of twins didn't help
1:24:48 Federer cursing himself out after an error
Why is agassi at 35 old and djokovic at 36 invincible?
Because medical technology has evolved, and tennis is now like formula 1 in the sense that a player is part of a large team whose job it is to manage the player as if he's a piece of technology himself. Plus of course, Djokovic evolved his style for maximum efficiency.... in comparison to Murray, who tried to compensate for an unnatural forehand technique and lack of power by running everything down.
why is Federer at 30 old and Djokovic at 36 invincible?
@@fg92626 djokovic is actually better today at tennis than he was at 26. 36 year old djokovic would beat the 2013 version
@@fg92626 doesn't seem very invincible to me.
@@peterhammer4644 time to change your glasses
Seems Agassi could not run because of ages.
1:42:40
Kinda funny how they talk about Lance Armstong and that he knows what effort is needed in sport. He lost all his titles because he was doped. It was revealed in 2012.
Imagine djokovic was still much of a teenager at this time😅😅 and to even imagine he surpassed everyone after watching this federer was unreal
This version of Federer would beat anybody. Anybody
Cool
Lance Armstrong did not win the Tour the France legally..
i was so disappontment after this match, but my boy djokovic makes the perect revenge for me 10 years later by the us open final 2015 exact on the same way like in this match...DESTINY FOR ME AS A agassi and djokovic fan
Coz the match was played in night session😂😂... Novak is rightly called as NIGHT ERA CHAMP
Djoko play during weak era
@@vijayendranvijay4538 NIGHT ERA CHAMP
@@vijayendranvijay4538 Why is he called the night era champ. Why not day?
Shame on the US Open for failing to upload this in high definition format. This poor video quality just makes the organization look bad.
us open 2015 federer would BEAT federer from 2005
2008 AO novak >>>>> post 2011 novak
U say 2015 fed is better coz its easier for u to argue that novak beat prime Roger in 2015😂😂😂... How idiotic man?
2007 uso novak >>>>>> 2015 uso novak
wouldn't win the US Open though...
ofc he would. but thats because he knows his own game and weaknesses. 05 federer is far more athletic and his constant aggression and the potency of his serve + 1 would beat 15 federer for sure
baby Nadal already owned Federer 3:0 😂😂
1000th
Fine match, all credit to Agassi. Amongst the worst commentaries ever, lots of stats, virtually no analysis of any depth about the tennis.
Hasta que vino un tal Novak Djokovic y le quito toda esa aura de invencible.
Ese fue Nadal en 2005-2008. Djokovic no despegó hasta 2011
6 años luego pero....
@@meitoli Pero practicamente lo ha sometido, hasta jgando mal le gana.
@@joselivia3998 y eso que tiene que ver, y Federer no es que ha perdido todos sus encuentros con Novak, de hecho el ultimo partido jugado entre ellos lo gano Federer, REVISA soquete 🤣
@@meitoli Ya empezastes con los adjetivos, Nole ya pierde de flojera con Federer, pero los 40 - 15 van hacer para ponerlos en cuadros para toda la vida., lloron.
Agassi > Federer/Nadal > Đoković
Dokovic ≧Nadal≧Federer ≫Agassi
Yes coz they played to their strengths instead of playing to opponent weakness
Djokovic > Nadal! Djokovic win Nadal 40> 39
Agassi’s career grand slam is certainly far more impressive than any of theirs because he got his in a time where surfaces were actually different from each other
Might as well add borg and rod laver
36:48