SJCAM C110 review . Where is the Electronic Image Stabilization you claim it has ?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 окт 2024
  • This has a 4k camera, time lapse and photo modes. Easy to operate with plenty of accessories to mount in various locations. Video is ok, except for the absence of image stabilization.

Комментарии • 24

  • @miqoi9067
    @miqoi9067 29 дней назад +2

    nice review

  • @orangeオレンジ
    @orangeオレンジ 7 дней назад +1

    not bad

  • @lezbriddon
    @lezbriddon Месяц назад +1

    any firmware updates from the official site?

    • @roundgarage
      @roundgarage  Месяц назад

      Not so far. I saw a video with the C110 plus , and the eis is not good on that either. I realized that a monitor is essential for an action camera to be sure of a decent shot. Thank you for your input..

  • @MusphyOfficial
    @MusphyOfficial Месяц назад +1

    i think EIS is in the c110 plus version. not in c110

    • @roundgarage
      @roundgarage  Месяц назад

      It says in the ad that there is Electronic image stabilization . The c110 plus is supposed to have gyro stabilization, but I watched a video and it's not good.

    • @skunkerton4253
      @skunkerton4253 26 дней назад

      ​@@roundgarageit is good i have c110+

  • @vikassharma-tb5lu
    @vikassharma-tb5lu 19 дней назад +1

    Nice reviews

  • @irwan-cawan
    @irwan-cawan 22 дня назад +1

    between c100+ and c110+ which one is better and why?

    • @roundgarage
      @roundgarage  22 дня назад

      I did not review the C110+. so I do not know.

    • @irwan-cawan
      @irwan-cawan 20 дней назад +1

      @@roundgarage no problem thanks for letting me know, i like the review 😊

  • @kronosdhful
    @kronosdhful 29 дней назад +1

    What about the mic? It's better than c100+

    • @roundgarage
      @roundgarage  29 дней назад +1

      Both are weak beyond 15", and it seems they both use the same processor NK 96680 or NK 96580 , depending on which part of the ad you read. The only difference is the aperture and the battery size. Thanks for your input.

  • @ThrottleAddiction
    @ThrottleAddiction Месяц назад +1

    I'd return the other one as well.
    Neither have footage acceptable in 2024.

    • @roundgarage
      @roundgarage  Месяц назад

      It's bad when a company misrepresents a product.

    • @Funkteon
      @Funkteon 24 дня назад +1

      Chinese manufacturers have this unique ability to track down the shittiest camera (and other PCB) components from the pre-2012-era days... A 13yo GoPro HERO 2 from 2011 shoots better video image quality than this piece of shite...

    • @roundgarage
      @roundgarage  23 дня назад

      @@Funkteon I agree, and SJCAM are developing a poor reputation by claiming their cameras have EIS when they don't. Thanks for your view.

  • @roundgarage
    @roundgarage  28 дней назад +1

    The better camera is ruclips.net/video/0Psuilswl6g/видео.htmlsi=gKd1t5PawR7Fbv0M

  • @FreakingALI
    @FreakingALI Месяц назад +2

    It looks like it is a useless camera

    • @roundgarage
      @roundgarage  Месяц назад

      Mounted on a tripod it's ok. but without eis , it's like a camera from 5yrs ago.

    • @skunkerton4253
      @skunkerton4253 26 дней назад +1

      Buy c110 plus it has good stabilization and good quality video

    • @roundgarage
      @roundgarage  26 дней назад +2

      @@skunkerton4253 I bought the C100+ and the C110. Both are claimed by SJCAM to have EIS , which they do not. This company misleads buyers, so I got the VIRAN V11 with 2 monitors for the same price as the C110+ , and it's good. Thank you for your input sir.

  • @HuxleyKimberley
    @HuxleyKimberley Месяц назад

    0816 Cruickshank Coves