MOST can't derive this equation
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 20 июл 2024
- The Chain Rule explained: • Confused by the Chain ...
Derivation of the velocity equation in simple harmonic motion.
All of oscillations revision video from me: • A Level Physics Revisi...
![Chk Chk Boom - Stray Kids ストレイキッズ 스트레이 키즈 [Music Bank] | KBS WORLD TV 240719](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/63QPwqCRGcw/mqdefault.jpg)
Thanks a lot for this derivation honestly. Probably the best explanation I have found on RUclips.
Anytime! Thanks a lot for the comment, much appreciated
Could this be asked as a question 😱😱??
Great video thank you:)
hi this is beyond a level physics. at least this method of deriving it
Wow this is just amazing
Glad you like it, thanks for the comment!
@@zhelyo_physics I really love your channel and love the way you explain physics so passionately,thank you very much for that and saving my A-Levels😭🤣
thank you so much! Comments such as these genuinely make my day!
hey very well explained..u made me feel how can i be so dumb to not being able to derive it..i've my exams soon so im in a too hurry ..which is making my brain stop working i actually did the differentiation part then i was like how am i gonna get √A²-X² thanks a lot for helping out
Glad you found the video useful, thanks for the comment!
@@zhelyo_physics 😀
*Most can derive this*
14 yo me solving it with negative problem
We have the energy as 1/2 kA^2 and 1/2 mv^2 + 1/2kx^2 and k = w^2x m
So shift position and obtain the results
Well done!!! Very impressive at this age!
Just a note that this solution is specific for springs, in general for SHM otherwise we would need to to do it with calculus as shown in the video. Well done!
@@zhelyo_physics very well explained video as well, i was initially searching for if my derivation is correct, i did a few pre steps which you did later tho 😅
@@zhelyo_physics you can use calculus to derive energy as x = Acos(wt), so if you take the derivative, you get velocity as -wAsin(wt) and i am considering the initial angle in the cosine function as 0, which would make it a little easier to solve
We can solve for the whole thing to get w = √(k/m), so i did a few pre steps
i guess i am in that most people part
fantastic!