Thank you so much for making this lecture. Because of you I passed my masters dissertation. I just found out today. You explained everything so concisely. None of my dissertation supervisors responded to my emails. This video helped me out during the pandemic when I had no resources. Thank you 😊 UPDATE: I passed my dissertation with merit!!!
well said, thank you for making it simple and short. Sometimes I believe I have been highjacked by the academic details and terminology, and no place to ask and find simple answers. The Uni + the Panel of Supervision may well be in love with complicating things. Thanks again Cecile for the great efforts and level of voice which are directly and logically undstood.
This is so useful -thanks so very much. Really clear distinctions here which i haven't found explained so clearly anywhere else. thank you so very much!
"simplistic" is a negative term. I think you mean simple or maybe even clear but not simplistic. She actually went over some very complicated processes and explained very thoroughly the steps and even the language needed to do this kind of work.
I did a marxist study of a novel specifically hegemony but was rejected on the basis that what is my method of analysis. They told me that Marxism is your perspective and it can't be the method of analysis, if someone can help me what could be my method of analysis??
Marxism is a perspective and it is known as that. So developing Marxism as a method of research would require a strong argument with sources. You would need to work out the step-by-step method and make an argument for 1) that it is a valid method - alongside the perspective; 2) that it is the right method for your research. You definitely would need sources to show that others have used Marxism as a perspective and as a method. See: www.leftvoice.org/Marxism-A-Method-Theory-and-Practice
@@cecilebadenhorst4997 thank you very much! The internal supervisor today told me to use deconstruction or Fairclough's three dimensional model of CDA as a method of analysis!!
Cecile Badenhorst Do you know if a spanish research paper can have one or two english keywords? I would love to be read by those audiences or at least some bilingual scientist living in those countries.
One question which is very tricky to me. If I am doing empirical research and my results derive from the primary sources which can be just statistics and tables, am I allowed to interprete them in the discussion session using the secondary sources? As I understood from your video the answer is yes, because my literature can include also secondary sources.
Thank you so much for making this lecture. Because of you I passed my masters dissertation. I just found out today. You explained everything so concisely. None of my dissertation supervisors responded to my emails. This video helped me out during the pandemic when I had no resources. Thank you 😊 UPDATE: I passed my dissertation with merit!!!
Thank you so much. You unpacked writing findings, discussions and conclusion in a simple manner yet so detailed. Very insightful.
I’m so thankful for this recording. Simple and easy enough to apply to my dissertation. Thank you so much.
Thank you for streamlining the last chapters of a dissertation or thesis. Your presentation is very helpful and gives very concrete advice.
Thank you for the clear and thorough explanation. I found it most helpful!
You were incredibly succinct. Thank you so much! This has seriously been helpful :)
This was extremely helpful to me- thank you so much for posting this informative video lecture.
Thank you for you're complete explanation.....its completely helpful in my bachelor course research, Thank you so much
Thanks for boiling that down. Very clear and helps to offer (much needed) structure to my results section :)
Thank you - very excited to be on my Results Chapter, and your video was a terrific help.
Your presentation was really helpful. It gave many ideas on how to approach the last chapter of the thesis. Many thanks.
This is truly amazing concise teaching of this content. Thank you Prof. Cecile
I saw this video 5 days to my M.Sc thesis submission deadline. it was undoubtedly helpful. Thank you very much.
Hello could you help me pls ?via email or whatsapp
i have 2 days lol
Thank you, so clear and straight to the point.
This was really clear, concise and useful. Thank you.
Thank you the best explanation I found here.
Very clear and concise. Thank you so much for this.
This is impressive. May God bless you
I study in the UK. I think you are the best. Your videos are so useful. Keep them coming.
well said, thank you for making it simple and short. Sometimes I believe I have been highjacked by the academic details and terminology, and no place to ask and find simple answers. The Uni + the Panel of Supervision may well be in love with complicating things.
Thanks again Cecile for the great efforts and level of voice which are directly and logically undstood.
Thank you very much for your presentation, very useful.
This is so useful -thanks so very much. Really clear distinctions here which i haven't found explained so clearly anywhere else. thank you so very much!
Thank you very much for this video presentation!!!
thank you for your excellent presentation which is really very helpful ....God bless
Thank you, this had been a life saver
Thank you for this video, really helpful!
Clear and very helpful presentation.
Thank you. A very useful explanation.
thank you, relay amazing explanation........ #
So perfectly clear!
Thank you so much! This is very helpful!
I am very grateful for this video. It is well presented and simplified and easy to follow
This is amazing, thank you
thanks a lot, this is really helpful
Great! Thank you!
Very useful and clear. Thank you.
Thank you for this video. It was very helpful
Adorable!
I really Appreciate your kind time.
A simplistic but brilliant approach to clarifying the more difficult aspects of research presentation. Well done.
"simplistic" is a negative term. I think you mean simple or maybe even clear but not simplistic. She actually went over some very complicated processes and explained very thoroughly the steps and even the language needed to do this kind of work.
Thank you ,it is very helpful to me.
Many thanks for this useful video
Thank you for this, clearly explained
Thank you very helpful and clear
Thank you for sharing this practical notes.
Fantastic explanation
Thanks
Thank you for this!!
Very insightful.
Thank you so much :)
Thank you!
Please make more of these videoes! You're very skilled at this. :) Theory chapter? I struggle with it. :)
Thank you very helpful
helped me a lot
8:55 Discussion chapter
Many many thanks
Thanks..helpful
Great voice please do more videos
thank you so much maam
6:43 That relieved me so much. I'm 2 days out from my submission and was worried that this method of presenting was wrong.
Caoimhín Ó Caoimh good luck!
@@IvarTheBoneless101 thank you
Thank you
15:20 Conclusiones
This is unique and extremely helpful.
Results and findings are given in which part of the Ph.D.Synopsis?
1. Introduction
2. Methodology
3. Significance of the study.
Thank you... I needed help with an epilogue. This helped.
Christine Pacinello, Ed.D. ok babe
very very helpful!
I did a marxist study of a novel specifically hegemony but was rejected on the basis that what is my method of analysis.
They told me that Marxism is your perspective and it can't be the method of analysis, if someone can help me what could be my method of analysis??
Marxism is a perspective and it is known as that. So developing Marxism as a method of research would require a strong argument with sources. You would need to work out the step-by-step method and make an argument for 1) that it is a valid method - alongside the perspective; 2) that it is the right method for your research. You definitely would need sources to show that others have used Marxism as a perspective and as a method. See: www.leftvoice.org/Marxism-A-Method-Theory-and-Practice
@@cecilebadenhorst4997 thank you very much!
The internal supervisor today told me to use deconstruction or Fairclough's three dimensional model of CDA as a method of analysis!!
Cecile Badenhorst Do you know if a spanish research paper can have one or two english keywords? I would love to be read by those audiences or at least some bilingual scientist living in those countries.
Sorry, I don’t know. There may be journals that do encourage this.
I still can't figure out the difference between the discussion and conclusion in the abstract that my teacher has given...
One question which is very tricky to me. If I am doing empirical research and my results derive from the primary sources which can be just statistics and tables, am I allowed to interprete them in the discussion session using the secondary sources? As I understood from your video the answer is yes, because my literature can include also secondary sources.
It's difficult to answer without knowing the specifics of your project but yes you can, usually.
비디오의 의미를 말해 줄 수 있니