So you say the Fluke measures nano seconds, where did you get that info? Is is possible you don't know what you are talking about and you really meant nano-siemens? You do know what a siemen is?
RiccoFX Not all of us have the money to randomly purchase a unit just to review it. Go on Flukes website if you so desperately want to see the features.
Lol, no doubt. Such different devices. Here is an apple and here I have an orange! No mention the plotting extra features on fluke, but mention the camera on flir.
nS is nanosiemens, i.e. conductance measurement, not nanoseconds
With the AC+DC function, there are some applications where both AC and DC are coupled on the line. Would be interesting to see that.
Now the biggest difference is the accuracy and certainty of value. Fluke got the lowest error, meaning it will give you up to 1/1000 accurate
I have fluke 289 and its pretty good device
Joshua, Can you comparate with Fluke 279 (thermal multimiter)
Can you compare their readings?
I have a flir CM174
So you say the Fluke measures nano seconds, where did you get that info? Is is possible you don't know what you are talking about and you really meant nano-siemens? You do know what a siemen is?
a measurement of conductance.
Proper comparison would have been against the Fluke thermal multimeter, these both have different features for different uses... this is a fail LoL
RiccoFX Not all of us have the money to randomly purchase a unit just to review it. Go on Flukes website if you so desperately want to see the features.
Then what's the point of doing a comparison review like this? You might as well compare it to a BANANA just because you have one and its cheap.... :P
Lol, no doubt. Such different devices. Here is an apple and here I have an orange! No mention the plotting extra features on fluke, but mention the camera on flir.
fluke 289 best