Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 сен 2024
- Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks ► www.quimbee.co...
Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins | 304 U.S. 64 (1938)
Henry Tompkins was walking along a railroad right of way. At the same time, a train owned by New York-based Erie Railroad Company was passing alongside him. An unknown object jutting out from the side of the train hit Tompkins, severing his right arm.
The law of Pennsylvania, where the accident happened, considered Tompkins a trespasser on railroad property. Because of this, the railroad’s only duty to Tomkins under Pennsylvania law was to avoid wanton negligence. Under such a harsh rule, Tompkins would have had a hard time winning his case in a Pennsylvania court.
Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here www.quimbee.co...
The Quimbee App features over 16,300 case briefs keyed to 223 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► www.quimbee.co...
Have Questions about this Case?
Submit your questions and get answers from real attorney here: www.quimbee.co...
Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here:
Subscribe to our RUclips Channel ► www.youtube.co...
Quimbee Case Brief App ► www.quimbee.co...
Facebook ► / quimbeedotcom
Twitter ► / quimbeedotcom
casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries
Good video ! you save my essay as a french student of law
The unknown object knocked Tompkins down and his arm was severed when the train ran over Tompkins' arm. The arm was found between the tracks.
Watched it for the third time - thank you!
How do you balance this with byrd and commerce clause?
I hear this changed all caselaw before it the year this case was decided
Yes this was a game changer. The difference between commercial law and common law. We needed this so the lower courts cannot be pirates
Love this video :)
Mod Awesome
The last law case that the court ruled on. After that they only ruled on policy.
Good Job. The Jury is above the law, so without corruption or treason being involved how did the supreme court over rule the jury decision?
Jury decides facts. Judges decide over law. A same fact can have differente consequences under different laws.
Well you have to add a hairy top 10 turn to a monster they make a super down place in you’re the last person in the whole people was dead by a monster any this guy get out from the monster it’s from the horror game it’s came out 2012