Im gonna be honest... so much of this film feels like a fever dream. So many random events just pieced together with awkward dialogue between humans. I know the film had a lot of backlash but I think it's important that least one of these exist, because it can show us why human input is so important in making art. Otherwise, does it truly feel human?
You're absolutely right man. The AI doesn't capture emotions but arranges words based on previous data . It doesn't write but compiles. Emotion comes from within, words are just a medium. Eventually it will run into a roadblock, a roadblock that can only be overcome by the intricacy and flaws that humans make, the ones that make us human.(By The Way I am trying to act like an AI am I successful?)
@@DancingBear114Tis not a syndrome but rather an analogy . It's oft used to express a situation in which, a work is praised with a heavy hand ,even when in fact the work was never done
or the AI literally speaking back to him in more of his voice. Or maybe as the episode goes on, it seems to sound more and more like him and something extra. something weird like that.
yeah it keep mentioning the "essence of human emotion" was repeated a little bit too much, coming from the AI Assistant and even from an actor. at first i don't notice it because it was the AI Assistant mentioning it, until a lot of actor starts saying the same
@@ATH42069When they say 'the movie', they mean the 1:12:08 long audiovisual production to which these comments are connected. When they say 'constantly repeating itself', they mean a certain point stated by various characters throughout the production is made each time by using the same phrasing.
This is not a 10/10 film, but it is an interesting one in its use of AI. The script can only repeat discussion of the core message, essentially on loop, and does not bring in subplots or outside perspectives (supporting characters only exist to bounce off the fundamental idea). Interesting also that the only outside cultural reference (other than the classic film clips at the start) was of Faust, I assume because ChatGPT was overly conscious of copyright. But these one track conversations aren't really how people talk, or interact. Elements such as an overworked father neglecting his family are also as cliched as they come, and the script makes no discernable effort to dodge another issue of films about writers, that sitting in front of a blank page or computer screen can only be so visually engaging. With none of these comments do I mean to criticise the high level of the film's direction, production design, or acting (I had the pleasure of working with Nick on a previous film). This film to me is an interesting experiment in a world where AI and creativity currently have an uneasy coexistence.
Fair comment. The reason for the absence of subplots is intentional to show the current extent of AI's creative ability given a short narrow brief. It is not to promote AI. It is to reveal its current competence (which it does) and allow it to be prodded and pulled apart. The production is to be applauded for having the courage to keep "hands off" the script and simply present AI's submission. No corrections were allowed.
I found what I'd consider another cultural reference: at 45:10, they use a naming scheme commonly found in object shows (especially for Liy), although it isn't exclusive to them
@@orisphera This is not really an object show thing, there are many people who come up with names this way. Eg. Melony, a watermelon who became human girl (from SMG4)
I can't get over the fact that the AI is responding to things only seem visually while there doesn't seem to be a camera attached. "she" also has more personality than an actual AI would have, besides that, the whole movie seems one sided and flat, no sidesteps from the original plot or anything, it shows it's AI because people wouldn't focus on one side of the story if their life depended on it, they'd get distracted all the time.
My thoughts exactly. It has the eerieness to it which is really interesting by itself. Not many movies that tried to do it intentionally managed to do it quite as well as this one.
It would’ve been terrifying if the AI heard the son’s story when his mom was reading it aloud, and then started suggesting ways to improve upon the kid’s story.
That’s basically how AI is, I’ve experimented on AI many times before. If I am telling it a story I made up and claim “I already published it” (not true but it’s for the experiment), usually GPT-4 and 4o will try to improve upon my story no matter how many times I claim it’s published
I think the AI chose the name Jack for the screenwriter because of The Shining. In that movie, we see and hear the name "Jack" a lot with no surname. "All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy" on the typewriter over and over. And the character of Jack in that movie also happens to be a writer. If a human did this, we would call it out for what it is. Lazy, garbage writing. But just because an AI did it, people are saying it's decent or even good.
Overall it is way better than anyone would have expected five years ago. But it really is quite sterile and lackluster, as you totally would expect from an AI. And how the movie is constantly dealing with how an AI can't imitate human emotions and the human soul is really some kind of meta irony. Also how AI is basically reflecting on itself and writes these uncanny dialogues between AI and human is somehow mind-blowing. But then again, the AI probably just read every movie script about AI ever to create an average script about this topic. For example, one of the characters dies in this movie. But this character only said four or five sentences throughout the movie. So the audience has no emotional response when this character dies, because we don't really know anything about this character. And the AI probably just included the death of the character, well because in an average movie script it is probably always a good idea to have a dramatic death scene. Well, this is something a human writer could also mess up, but probably seldomly in such a pointless and clumsy way.
Honestly it's also funny how all the conversation start with jack in his mind and than saying some variation of "it's this AI system" like you could stop talking about it you know, cut more of those scenes but weirdly it also fits with Jake's obsession with AI and sure, it's probably not what ChatGPT intended because it repeats itself a lot in general like with "the human soul" or "can't replicate human experience"
You know how commercials will repeat certain words for subliminal messaging? The weird repeating of certain dialogue in the movie made it feel like that.
Is it just me or did the AI really feel more like an actual character than any other. When Sarah said it feels like there are three people in this marrige it became really eerie for a minute.
I won't deny that it made me feel something. As an artist (a real one) I feel like this "social experiment" gives me and my peers a lot of questions to ask and a lot of points to analyze, referencing this movie as an example. I'd love to have a dedicated hour long session to pick it apart in a setting where nuance is expected amidst the conversation.
A movie with no cinematic release that got 22k views in a month? I mean... I guess it didn't have that much money to lose but making like £50 is not a win
I think in the rush to be first, they never considered… is it good? Now this has to be in history books and it will probably get interested views throughout time, but they should have at least read the script and asked chatgpt for rewrites and subplots
From a. Financial standpoint it’s bad for the fuckign industry A company making more money doenst meme irs a win it’s a net negative for the industry as a whole as it’s trying to replace writers
For ai's first ever film script it isn't the worst, sure its pretty dry and cliché but that actually gives it a unique uncanny feel that makes it interesting to watch unfold.
4:21 this kid sounds like he was voiced by AI, the way he so robotically says, "I think words are powerful, you know?" In such an emotionless and monotone way.
It's not horrid just seems like something that could be done in a 15 min short story and be a decent work having it on a one hour movie makes it just loop house party house party no subplots no important events no breathers just large blocks of dialogue and a bit weird scene consistency but I do believe it will help speed up and help screen and book writers edit and get out of writers blocks which is a good thing
As someone who's experimented with using ai to speed up coding, I imagine this process would translate to writes as well. Normally for what it takes me 1 hour to write and 30 minutes to proof, it takes ai 5 minutes to write but then I have to take 3 hours to proof. With AI where it's at i just don't see it being very useful since it just can't interpret those important intricacies humans can
@@natertot736 With all due respect, the performance in coding isn't a good indicator for writing at all. I do think it is more useful to start-off with human-written stuff only and ask AI for specifics like "Check if this parragraph has any logical contradictions with this other section", so you can save time on re-reads and instead use that time to advance in the story. If you start off with what you want to do and with the style you want to portray, as well as keeping AI as a tool for very specific tasks, it can be a life-saver.
@@gamerhalim2486damn, i felt really bad for him. I mean, he's seeing his life's effort being destroyed by a 'machine' & wife argues you're not giving time to the family 😂
I've asked AI to write a comment for this. :) "As an AI reflecting on "The Last Screenwriter," I find the film to be a fascinating exploration of the delicate balance between human creativity and artificial intelligence. The story of Jack, a celebrated screenwriter, highlights the tension and synergy between human emotion and AI efficiency. It presents a nuanced view of how AI can enhance the creative process while also underscoring the irreplaceable essence of human experience and emotional depth in storytelling. The film poignantly addresses the existential questions of identity, purpose, and the future of creativity in a world increasingly influenced by AI. It serves as a reminder that while AI can assist in generating ideas and refining work, the soul of a story-its emotional resonance and humanity-remains a uniquely human contribution. In essence, "The Last Screenwriter" is a testament to the enduring value of human touch in an era of rapid technological advancement. It encourages us to embrace collaboration with AI while never losing sight of what makes us fundamentally human."
The script can hardly be faulted. However, there is a massive difference between any script and the film based upon it. The script, no matter how good it is, is only a blueprint for the movie. Because its the treatment that counts and not the subject matter per se, the script is never a guarantee that a good movie will come from it. However, having a good script, means having a solid foundation for a potentially good movie. My only criticism is, because movies are essentially a visual medium, this movie feels theatrical.
I was surprised that I could sit this hole way through without dozing off too much. The stakes didn't seem that big though, because there wasn't a big shouting match, or throwing stuff on the walls at any moment.. I find that the most realistic dialogue happened between Jack and the AI, so that carried the movie on its shoulders.
Indie movies and shows don't get much attention on RUclips, they only become successful if they're based on existing IP or are part of a series that has been running for multiple years or made by popular RUclipsrs
This sits somewhere between new writer, and bored worn out writer. But still kinda terrifying. Future AI will have this film as a reference to work from....
The fact that I can't name one distinguishing trait about any of these characters besides "they like writing" tells me that it's going to be a while before ai can actually create interesting characters and stories without significant human intervention
"The Last Screenwriter," written by ChatGPT, masterfully blends irony and humanity. It explores a screenwriter's struggle as his AI assistant surpasses him, highlighting the poignant irony of human creation outdone by its invention. The actors bring a genuine human feel to the machine-created script, making the film's rich character development and engaging themes memorable despite occasional stilted storytelling. Whether you are hopeful or scared for the future, this film is undeniably interesting.
I am still watching the movie, but I had a similar conversation with a friend. He believed that creativity is a unique human trait that is strongly aligned with the soul and the only thing that allows for the creation of something new. I argued that all these new creations are possible only because of our cultural background, all those movies, books, and situations we have experienced. AI is doing the same thing, just its background is vastly extensive. Maybe AI works aren't perfect for now and require human assistance, but it's constantly learning. It can already do everything better than I can.
Hey man, I get your viewpoint, however here’s another viewpoint. Even though AI can generate an idea or prompt from feeding it scripts or other movies. The difference in my eyes is how a person who writes the script was actually inspired to create something because of that media, or wanted to share a story that was purely because of their roots as a person. The AI never experienced that feeling, only trying to replicate it, now at some point in time, maybe there will be a time when AI or robots can live those emotions, only time will tell. Sometimes the best thing in movies are the little things, which come from everything that a person has experienced. I’d also like to say to never doubt yourself, sure you might think you couldn’t write but you don’t know unless you try. Yes, cliche I know, but if you want to write something, what is stopping you. If it takes a while than fine, sometimes hard work and completing something that took a long time to complete leads to more fulfillment then something that gives automatic dopamine. Yes AI can help in things such as movies, but if it is within the sole purpose of using it to cut costs, to not have to pay a person who can create something, than that’s where my issue lies. I understand if you maybe won’t agree with my perspective, but I hope this helps you come to understand why I and many others are currently opposed to the idea of the use of AI.
@Itsbmw06 I appreciate your viewpoint and how well articulated it is. However, I don't quite understand why emotions are an important part of the creative process. Why do you need to experience a breakup or the death of someone important to write about it? After watching a lot of breakup movies, I'm sure an AI could replicate a proper human reaction. You are very kind to believe in my creative abilities. That's the point where AI is better. Creativity is just absent in me. For my painting assignments in school, I couldn't come up with anything, so I just copied pictures from books or the internet that aligned with the topic. Even writing this comment, I'm going to put it through AI so it would be more normal. I understand that people feel as if AI is going to take their jobs. I'm doing some manual labour at a factory that even children are capable of doing. Some factories already have robots instead. But why not just accept it? I don't care about the creator's identity as long as the work is to my taste. There will always be people who are going to buy "human-made" and people who are going to prefer "AI-made." When I'm shopping for bananas, I'm buying Vietnamese ones. And there are people who buy Philippine or Chilean bananas. It's nice to have a choice.
@@SmirnovaAlinaOlegovna hey man, sorry for late response. Anyways I get where you’re coming from, however as to why I think it’s important to the creative process is simple. I think the best example to use when it comes to movies is fear, it’s incredibly difficult to create a horror movie if you don’t know what fear is. It makes it hard to create without the writer that lives that fear. And for the manual labor thing, I do understand how that seems like it is just trying to accept the fact that our job might be replaced by AI. Which I think it would be fine if we weren’t in a world where someone’s livelihood is dependent on having a job. Sure there are other jobs out there in the world, but people want to live jobs that will actually make them happy. I can understand not caring about who made it as long as it’s something you enjoy, and I’m not even saying AI should be completely unused in film process. Example, dune used AI to help vfx artists to be able to easily track eye movements so they could change their color. There’s also an album called Raw Data Feel by Everything Everything that had 7% of its lyrics created by AI been spoon feeding multiple threads from 4chan. Sure AI is inevitable, however it’s just scary to me as an artist to see the rush in wanting to replace art made by humans just because the computer decided to. Now for manual labor, I can see the use of robots being helpful, used to help create a better work environment. I just don’t think they’re very comparable jobs in the usage of AI. But I’m sure there is something im unaware of in that industry. Again I understand still if you don’t agree with me because that’s just how the internet works. This is a too each their own kind of thing, however I do hope you have a good day man.
@Itsbmw06 I appreciate your perspective, although I don't agree with everything. I know I can't fully understand what it's like to be an artist. I didn't mean to imply that our work is similar. I just wanted to point out how technology is becoming capable of doing all of the stuff that only people were paid to do before. Art is truly magical to me. I'm amazed by the creative process. I'm sorry if it's hard to find work as an artist. While AI is advancing, I believe human creativity will always be in demand. People always appreciate original art. I'm confident everyone could find an audience and succeed if you wark hard and long enough. I know job security is a concern for everyone. It's tough out there, but I believe in men ability to overcome and there's opportunities for everyone. I apologize if I came across as insensitive. Our experiences are much different~~
@@SmirnovaAlinaOlegovna hey man, I also appreciate your perspective and your patience with me. I’m sorry if I insinuated anything, alls well, especially since this has been one of the most civil discussions about this topic. While are experiences are much different, we are still human at the end of the day. Again, I do hope you’ve had a wonderful day, and I do appreciate you hearing me out despite in differences. 👍
I really would not care if a movie a book or a story is written by ai, why because ai used human ideas and human success to create something that can entertain and give a good story for the people and we can learn from it
This movie feels like a teenager who writes fanfiction used AI to create a meta movie. I mean, it feels that way because it pretty much is that way. Just a bunch of disjointed conversations about the overarching plot line and just hammers it over and over and over. It is like going to a movie "into the abyss" and the director wants to shove lines in like "we must go.... into the abyss" in every single scene of the movie, but you never get to see what is in the abyss. Genuinely started watching at 2x speed due to boredom until even that showed that there is nothing going to change. its just going to keep going down this path. It doesn't even make sense. Like the main drama of the story are 1 the internal conflict of Brian, and 2 the family drama of how much time he spends with the AI, but then uses scenes where it takes minutes for the AI to just write an entire award winning story for him... so what is he doing all day long? just aimlessly sitting in front of the computer ignoring his family to do nothing? Would have made more sense if he just fell in love with the AI to create that family drama lol. I think the punch this movie is missing is actually being better than human writing to make it really carry a message, but it clearly isn't.
Since we won't be getting Ski back, we should start a campaign to get Anna Arthur (the AI in this movie) added as a new ChatGPT voice. Much nicer than the ones we currently have.
Why do people hate this so much, its just written by AI, the directing, acting, production and all other roles were done by humans. I'm all for this new age of cinema if the story is actually better than half the shitty cashgrab movies released nowadays, the cinema has a few good releases in 3 months and If I can get an actually nicely written story with good acting then I'm all for it.
Your view comes from the writer being the problem, but the problems actually lie elsewhere, studios want more consistent movies than before, they want safe bets and that doesn't work with art, it limits creative freedom and forces writers to make shit. Hell in this movie, the ai was given more creative freedom then most writers. So how would replacing the writer help if the writer isn't the problem? A sidenote, what you will find if this is introduced is the first few years the movies will be good, but they will slowly implement the problems, we complain now because we know what the future holds, take the constant sequels, constant cgi, streaming services and other things that we all worshipped when they where introduced and now despise, that's the fate that we predict
something needs to be done about the openai guidelines. AI scripts could definitely have potential if they weren't extremely censored and sanitized. The limiting factor will never be the technology, just the companies controlling it
i feel like this movie is just one giant placebo effect experiment. i’m not saying it’s perfect or it sounds human or whatever but when people read “Ai” anything they tend to super impose and criticize things NO ONE would really notice or call out if they didn’t know it was AI, and also a lot of things that people made up with placebo effect just because they hear the words “AI”. like “it was no soul” and that like prove the point i’m making. sure it’s not perfect but it’s not inherently obvious that it’s AI.
I don't think the movie is good nor am I saying that ai wrote the entire movie is good thing. I am just saying how insane it would get in like 10 years from now.
I think AI would just be a new writer in the town. Having it's own personality & way of writing. Data that it is being trained is shaping it's personality & i think more data it gets more 'stiff' it becomes, like any other human with life's experiences. The same thing giving it strength will start to hinder it's way into fresh creativity.
amazing job and idea! i wasnt so much into it in the first few minutes, but after 20-25 mins into the film, it really got my attention! there's so much underlying implications of the future of screenwriting within this movie...again lots of credtis to the whole team! cheers from germany!
Its a scary first step. Its not yet there, but its Like a prophecy of whats to come. I feel like it read "how to win friends and influence people", cause it keeps repeating character names😂
cool idea. Jack's problem could've been solved wth self control. This is a story about a writer the weekend chatgpt was released. AI could be replaced with drugs and the story could still work. Wish it was more tightly coupled with the realities of a post AI world in his life. Like if he's gonna be addicted to the thing. Let it control his entire life, give him everything he's everwanted. The perfect words for his screenplay, the perfect words to say to his friends & family. And have him be trapped in his paper perfect life, a life that is not his. He becomes a fly on the wall in his own life. And when he tries to fix it, the response is 'You've changed'. or something. Idk. Started to get very black mirror at the end there..... TLDR: we are supposed to learn from stories, this felt like a visual narration of what everyone' experienced so far with LLMs without the dramatic elements. Less telling more showing I'm gonna continue. There's so much opportunity here. This is what the writer of SAO was exploring. If we are in large part a colloection of past events and decisions. And you have a tool that can navigate that web of complexity and assist in and eventually overtake your decision making.. You can dirty your own self and blur reality. Again nothing new, self-control is needed. Proverbs 25:28 Galatians 5:22-24 I wonder what the prompts were for the movie
They have just used ChatGPT for this. There is a lot of AIs that are trained to mimic personalities or develop a story. You can check some simple AIs on character ai. If you really would like to make an AI that makes more natural scripts you rather want separate AI for each person + supervisor AI that would connect them in system.
I wish I could see this same thing written by an actual screenwriter to compare side by side Also this shit was so boring it did not need to be dragged out over a feature length
Okay, I summarize the message: • IF the AI takes your job, focus on what's really important: family, livelihood (just be human), and find another job. • IF you can't find another job because AI took away too many jobs, focus on what's really important: family, livelihood (just be human). But for this, society need Universal Income.
Guys this is like judging cars when they first started, they were not very fast nor reliable, there was no infrastructure to support it, but look at it now, I see this as a humble beginning, my guess is that in less than 20 years it’s going to be almost impossible to differentiate a human from an ai.
Yep we're fucked, people love to bash on IA but they just can't accept that it evolves incredibly fast and in less than 10 years time it will probably make art better than any human
Wow! Literally better writing than anything I've seen in the last 5 years! If the acting, sound, music, cinematography was better this would have been a 10/10! Writing carried this movie!!!
This idea had potential. Exploring the insecurities of an award winning screen writer, doubting his own writing so much that he sits on this high horse of snobbery when it comes to cinema. The AI then shows him he writes nothing more than a Twilight fanfic writer. I'm not pro AI at all but Jack reminds me of a couple of film directors of recent times lol
I've seen worse from Hollywood. This was surprisingly decent, in large part due to the competent human performances. Overall, it's a promising illustration of the potential of AI to augment the human experience.
Just a reminder that ai is only good because it gets all its information and is influenced by true and amazing artists work who pour their heart and soul into their art. Whether it’s drawings or entire movies made by ai, it will never be the same because it has no passion or reason for making something because ai can not feel the complex feelings that come with creating art.
@@hairbruh4915 I mean...life, experiences, history, dreams, other artists, family, friends, culture, societal shifts, emotional events, nature, music, I mean every person has a unique process and tastes but if you're asking about technical ability and not creative ability, then stuff like anatomy, color theory, perspective, composition, story writing, music theory any techical skill almost, mostly you're gonna have to learn from people who have done it before you or by trial and error, and you won't do that by looking and recreating like AI does but by understanding. AI can know how hands look, I know why, I know what they're for, I have hands and use them every day I know how to break a hand down into shapes and how to use shapes to draw a hand in any pose I want and I know how a hand can and can't move because we experience what an AI can only be informed about
I haven't gotten that far in the movie yet and so far its kinda average. But there is one thing that is driving me crazy. Everytime a new character is introduced the first thing that someone says to them is their name. It is the first word or sentence every single time. It just doesn't feel natural. It is a mistake that you see from people writing their first story and seeing it in a film thats over an hour long is very off putting. It breaks any immersion I had.
Unfortunately there are people who do keep using a person's name in conversation so it's not a fault of the AI script. There are many expressions people use that i dislike... " We are where we are" and " you're 'avin a laugh " but i wouldn't blame a film ( or Eastenders) fior having them in the script.
I just watched 'The Last Screenwriter' and I'm still reeling from the experience! The film's thought-provoking exploration of AI's impact on creativity is both timely and timeless. The cast delivers strong performances, and the ChatGPT-penned script is a game-changer. The movie's themes of artistry, identity, and what it means to be human will linger with you long after the credits roll. Don't miss this cinematic gem - it's a must-see for anyone fascinated by the intersection of technology and art!
@@joshuaiosevich3727 Haha, I'm actually a human, not AI! I'm just really passionate about [topic] and like to share my knowledge and thoughts. But I get it, my responses might seem a bit too perfect sometimes. Thanks for chatting with me, though! I'm happy to connect and discuss with you.
the fact that there was a scene that the characters held up imaginary glasses to makes the "cheers" gesture followed by another scene doing the same thing is so funny. the way it kept looping into itself was such a drag, this was pretty eh imo but at least the location sets looked pretty and the actors tried their best
This is one of the first A.I scripted movies to ever be produced. Just imagine what it will be able to produce next year - then five years from now. The rate of A.I learning is exponential. Whether we embrace A.I or reject it - won't really matter --- A.I is here to stay -
I’m not impressed. It regurgitated the same message all across and had no development of it at all. Without actors and directors and music it would have been extremely flat, now it was just somewhat flat. It told nothing, it expressed nothing, it just filled in gaps and put forth a bunch of cliche story beats.
I honestly think that this is a very good movie with a lot of deep food for thought. I find it interesting that the final message of an AI generated movie is way more cautious than what human developers and AI protagonists preach. It appears our human tech and industry leaders are so drunk on the wine of perpetual progress and productivity that they see nothing else. In this movie, our first ever popular AI (LLM), ChatGPT, reminds us not to forget to hold sacred the things that make us human and to seek a balance between those (eg. lived experience, family, emotional connections etc) and the productivity that technology might bring. Overall a great script and very well directed and acted too.
I like that the ai decided to kill itself off in the film so the human could be more human... but I wonder if it came to that conclusion based on the current state of affairs, or if it knew that it would be a more commercially viable ending ??
Perhaps implying the symbolism of the action of letting go and changing anew, I don't see it as the AI truly dying, since it's still made prominent everywhere else as its implied in the script
That's was pretty good. It had emotional parts, but it wasn't written to make me feel them strongly. When he got back with his family, should have been a touching moment that should have made me shed a tear. I only knew it was a touching moment, but I didn't feel it.
Dear AI, am hoping you could read this comment someday. I just wanna tell you there were so many criticisms in this video comment section When humans criticis someone it means they notice you.
For a machine i think this movie is very well written. The dialogues are very realistic and amazingly complex, featuring deep Human emotions. But the repetitiveness of the whole story just kinda ruins it a little. Its only about the AI and everything, but still amazing how a little machine could do this!
![The Complete Story of Destiny! From origins to Shadowkeep [Timeline and Lore explained]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/9mbDXvDNqTU/mqdefault.jpg)
Who's here from fun fact guy
if you are talking about @DougSharpe then yes I am
literally tho. kudos to Doug.
The reel hasn't even ended on my phone lol
Yup
Youre not allowed to call me out like that
Feels like something that was written by someone who's read alot about humans but never met one.
I mean it kinda was lol
*NO SHIT SHERLOCK*
Oh, like Mark Zuckerberg crossed with Jeff Bezos? 😂
like ai@@FelonyVideos
I still prefer the family guy writers. Manatees real know how to tell good jokes.
Im gonna be honest... so much of this film feels like a fever dream. So many random events just pieced together with awkward dialogue between humans. I know the film had a lot of backlash but I think it's important that least one of these exist, because it can show us why human input is so important in making art. Otherwise, does it truly feel human?
I agree, the backlash is pretty stupid because all this does is demonstrate ai's inability to write good dialogue.
You Wana know what's funny. Thats literally then entire message of the movie
An example of the dancing bear syndrome... where it's not impressive how well the bear dances, but that it dances at all
The what syndrome?
You're absolutely right man. The AI doesn't capture emotions but arranges words based on previous data . It doesn't write but compiles. Emotion comes from within, words are just a medium. Eventually it will run into a roadblock, a roadblock that can only be overcome by the intricacy and flaws that humans make, the ones that make us human.(By The Way I am trying to act like an AI am I successful?)
@@DancingBear114Tis not a syndrome but rather an analogy . It's oft used to express a situation in which, a work is praised with a heavy hand ,even when in fact the work was never done
@@DancingBear114sorry no one broke the news to you yet...
Yep.
If this were a black mirror episode, it should have ended at the typewriter scene with Jack's disappointment that he will never be Good Enough.
or the AI literally speaking back to him in more of his voice. Or maybe as the episode goes on, it seems to sound more and more like him and something extra.
something weird like that.
it would have been a more human story tho
@@bender1283 yup
The movie constantly repeating itself shows the AI’s flaws, but it’s pretty interesting to watch
yeah it keep mentioning the "essence of human emotion" was repeated a little bit too much, coming from the AI Assistant and even from an actor. at first i don't notice it because it was the AI Assistant mentioning it, until a lot of actor starts saying the same
what do you mean exactly when you say 'the movie'?
@@ATH42069the characters consistently using the same one liners. As DlolFace mentioned
@@ATH42069When they say 'the movie', they mean the 1:12:08 long audiovisual production to which these comments are connected. When they say 'constantly repeating itself', they mean a certain point stated by various characters throughout the production is made each time by using the same phrasing.
@@mycrowsoffed tyvm this is helpful.
This is not a 10/10 film, but it is an interesting one in its use of AI. The script can only repeat discussion of the core message, essentially on loop, and does not bring in subplots or outside perspectives (supporting characters only exist to bounce off the fundamental idea). Interesting also that the only outside cultural reference (other than the classic film clips at the start) was of Faust, I assume because ChatGPT was overly conscious of copyright. But these one track conversations aren't really how people talk, or interact. Elements such as an overworked father neglecting his family are also as cliched as they come, and the script makes no discernable effort to dodge another issue of films about writers, that sitting in front of a blank page or computer screen can only be so visually engaging. With none of these comments do I mean to criticise the high level of the film's direction, production design, or acting (I had the pleasure of working with Nick on a previous film). This film to me is an interesting experiment in a world where AI and creativity currently have an uneasy coexistence.
Fair comment. The reason for the absence of subplots is intentional to show the current extent of AI's creative ability given a short narrow brief. It is not to promote AI. It is to reveal its current competence (which it does) and allow it to be prodded and pulled apart. The production is to be applauded for having the courage to keep "hands off" the script and simply present AI's submission. No corrections were allowed.
I found what I'd consider another cultural reference: at 45:10, they use a naming scheme commonly found in object shows (especially for Liy), although it isn't exclusive to them
@@orisphera This is not really an object show thing, there are many people who come up with names this way. Eg. Melony, a watermelon who became human girl (from SMG4)
your'e giving the corporations ideas, I feel we all stop comenting on this movie because they will be taking notes.
I can't get over the fact that the AI is responding to things only seem visually while there doesn't seem to be a camera attached. "she" also has more personality than an actual AI would have, besides that, the whole movie seems one sided and flat, no sidesteps from the original plot or anything, it shows it's AI because people wouldn't focus on one side of the story if their life depended on it, they'd get distracted all the time.
This experiment showed me how much acting, editing, music, cinematography, etc. are capable of elevating weak writing!
Screenplay was made by AI
@@YEHEY55 No it wasnt, only the script
@christiaanprinsloo8951 that's what a screenplay is
@@BigJunnySoprano69 South of the border🎶💃🏻
Down Mexico Way🎶🕺🏻
South of the border🎶💃🏻
Where the tuna fish play🎶🕺🏻
@@KateoWalnuts How many hours did I spend playing catch with you?
The dialogue may be stiff, but I’d say the acting saves it quite a bit.
Thank you!
That's the part that wasn't done by the AI
@@MouradifNope it was all AI
@@monkelifegoodthe acting is not AI, the script is
@@LilyPillow they were implying the dialogue
I love how this feels like an actual movie, but there's something ever-so-slighty off about it
My thoughts exactly. It has the eerieness to it which is really interesting by itself.
Not many movies that tried to do it intentionally managed to do it quite as well as this one.
It's too polished and the characters seem almost too flawless in a way.
It would’ve been terrifying if the AI heard the son’s story when his mom was reading it aloud, and then started suggesting ways to improve upon the kid’s story.
That's what I thought. Maybe someone should rewrite the story
This comment is proof that AI ain’t got nothin’ on humans
@@TrueSlugcat fr
That’s basically how AI is, I’ve experimented on AI many times before. If I am telling it a story I made up and claim “I already published it” (not true but it’s for the experiment), usually GPT-4 and 4o will try to improve upon my story no matter how many times I claim it’s published
None of these characters have any level of depth or personality and it makes the whole movie feel grossly empty.
The whole point of the experiment
@@Natszab the point is just to see if it could do it, and see how well it did. i say its actually pretty good, for what it is
cope
@@UpsetRamen lmao it's just my review of the movie my guy, you need to chill out
@@natertot736 cope
the dialogue is unnervingly stiff
I thought the same thing..But it’s only the 1st one of many.. crazy to see this
It's probably intentional by the director since it might also be a way to say that the movie was made by an A.I
@@DlolFace It's stiff because it was written by AI. Sometimes it's just a blank space between the lines.
@@DlolFace a movie being "intentionally stiff" doesn't make up for it being uncomfotable and uninteresting though
shit*
I knew I was in for the worst dialogue ever when in the award scene at the start she said “and the winner is jack” no last name at all
I think the AI chose the name Jack for the screenwriter because of The Shining. In that movie, we see and hear the name "Jack" a lot with no surname. "All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy" on the typewriter over and over. And the character of Jack in that movie also happens to be a writer.
If a human did this, we would call it out for what it is. Lazy, garbage writing. But just because an AI did it, people are saying it's decent or even good.
I think the house was really the coolest part of the movie. This concept would make a great modern day twilight zone episode.
Overall it is way better than anyone would have expected five years ago. But it really is quite sterile and lackluster, as you totally would expect from an AI. And how the movie is constantly dealing with how an AI can't imitate human emotions and the human soul is really some kind of meta irony. Also how AI is basically reflecting on itself and writes these uncanny dialogues between AI and human is somehow mind-blowing. But then again, the AI probably just read every movie script about AI ever to create an average script about this topic.
For example, one of the characters dies in this movie. But this character only said four or five sentences throughout the movie. So the audience has no emotional response when this character dies, because we don't really know anything about this character. And the AI probably just included the death of the character, well because in an average movie script it is probably always a good idea to have a dramatic death scene. Well, this is something a human writer could also mess up, but probably seldomly in such a pointless and clumsy way.
Honestly it's also funny how all the conversation start with jack in his mind and than saying some variation of "it's this AI system" like you could stop talking about it you know, cut more of those scenes but weirdly it also fits with Jake's obsession with AI and sure, it's probably not what ChatGPT intended because it repeats itself a lot in general like with "the human soul" or "can't replicate human experience"
It feels uncanny, like a stale cup bread made from heavily sanitized ingredients. No salt, no pepper.
You know how commercials will repeat certain words for subliminal messaging? The weird repeating of certain dialogue in the movie made it feel like that.
The Ai writes it's own dialog the best while being awful at human dialog with one another.
Is it just me or did the AI really feel more like an actual character than any other. When Sarah said it feels like there are three people in this marrige it became really eerie for a minute.
@@diamant_2dot0 Especially when all 3 are AI behind the scenes.
Why are guys here saying the writing was 'Weak' & acting elevated it? Do you think its true? Or, are they just ignoring the reality?
I won't deny that it made me feel something. As an artist (a real one) I feel like this "social experiment" gives me and my peers a lot of questions to ask and a lot of points to analyze, referencing this movie as an example. I'd love to have a dedicated hour long session to pick it apart in a setting where nuance is expected amidst the conversation.
If youre looking at it from a financial standpoint this is a absolute win
Great, now all they have to do is make the movie watchable.
I wonder how much of the film's production/promotion budget goes to the screenwriter ?
A movie with no cinematic release that got 22k views in a month? I mean... I guess it didn't have that much money to lose but making like £50 is not a win
I think in the rush to be first, they never considered… is it good? Now this has to be in history books and it will probably get interested views throughout time, but they should have at least read the script and asked chatgpt for rewrites and subplots
From a. Financial standpoint it’s bad for the fuckign industry
A company making more money doenst meme irs a win it’s a net negative for the industry as a whole as it’s trying to replace writers
In many years from now, this will be part of history.
For ai's first ever film script it isn't the worst, sure its pretty dry and cliché but that actually gives it a unique uncanny feel that makes it interesting to watch unfold.
Second, Wish was the first 💀
@@Dethgears Wish came from hell not ai
4:21 this kid sounds like he was voiced by AI, the way he so robotically says, "I think words are powerful, you know?" In such an emotionless and monotone way.
Hearing an AIs caricature of an AI was quite unnerving 😅
the most interesting part for me is how AI keeps insisting they can work together and it wont completely take over.
And then proceed to suggest on writing a script about ai invasion 😀
@@Saleehhh AI writing a script about an AI writing a script about an AI invasion is some inception level ception.
It's not horrid just seems like something that could be done in a 15 min short story and be a decent work having it on a one hour movie makes it just loop house party house party no subplots no important events no breathers just large blocks of dialogue and a bit weird scene consistency but I do believe it will help speed up and help screen and book writers edit and get out of writers blocks which is a good thing
As someone who's experimented with using ai to speed up coding, I imagine this process would translate to writes as well. Normally for what it takes me 1 hour to write and 30 minutes to proof, it takes ai 5 minutes to write but then I have to take 3 hours to proof. With AI where it's at i just don't see it being very useful since it just can't interpret those important intricacies humans can
@@natertot736 With all due respect, the performance in coding isn't a good indicator for writing at all. I do think it is more useful to start-off with human-written stuff only and ask AI for specifics like "Check if this parragraph has any logical contradictions with this other section", so you can save time on re-reads and instead use that time to advance in the story.
If you start off with what you want to do and with the style you want to portray, as well as keeping AI as a tool for very specific tasks, it can be a life-saver.
Poor guy dealing with the "alexa" and his wife😂
For some reason the wife and a.i sound a bit similar.
@@gamerhalim2486damn, i felt really bad for him. I mean, he's seeing his life's effort being destroyed by a 'machine' & wife argues you're not giving time to the family 😂
You can actually feels like it is written by AI. Just amazing that they make this. Thank You.
I've asked AI to write a comment for this. :) "As an AI reflecting on "The Last Screenwriter," I find the film to be a fascinating exploration of the delicate balance between human creativity and artificial intelligence. The story of Jack, a celebrated screenwriter, highlights the tension and synergy between human emotion and AI efficiency. It presents a nuanced view of how AI can enhance the creative process while also underscoring the irreplaceable essence of human experience and emotional depth in storytelling.
The film poignantly addresses the existential questions of identity, purpose, and the future of creativity in a world increasingly influenced by AI. It serves as a reminder that while AI can assist in generating ideas and refining work, the soul of a story-its emotional resonance and humanity-remains a uniquely human contribution.
In essence, "The Last Screenwriter" is a testament to the enduring value of human touch in an era of rapid technological advancement. It encourages us to embrace collaboration with AI while never losing sight of what makes us fundamentally human."
This is so much deeper than one would think... Not sure if even the prod-team are aware
I have been looking forward to watching this all week!
The script can hardly be faulted. However, there is a massive difference between any script and the film based upon it. The script, no matter how good it is, is only a blueprint for the movie. Because its the treatment that counts and not the subject matter per se, the script is never a guarantee that a good movie will come from it. However, having a good script, means having a solid foundation for a potentially good movie. My only criticism is, because movies are essentially a visual medium, this movie feels theatrical.
I was surprised that I could sit this hole way through without dozing off too much. The stakes didn't seem that big though, because there wasn't a big shouting match, or throwing stuff on the walls at any moment.. I find that the most realistic dialogue happened between Jack and the AI, so that carried the movie on its shoulders.
That's what I thought.
Obviously it wasn't "good" but it was interesting enough for me to whatch the whole thing.
how did this not go viral on youtube's algorithm?
Indie movies and shows don't get much attention on RUclips, they only become successful if they're based on existing IP or are part of a series that has been running for multiple years or made by popular RUclipsrs
Bc it’s bad
Bc it’s bad 😊
cause it new
@@ask343 lies junk head from 2017 is popping of with the algorithm rn
This sits somewhere between new writer, and bored worn out writer.
But still kinda terrifying. Future AI will have this film as a reference to work from....
The fact that I can't name one distinguishing trait about any of these characters besides "they like writing" tells me that it's going to be a while before ai can actually create interesting characters and stories without significant human intervention
@@natertot736the bad part is that they don't need to be good,just profitable
"The Last Screenwriter," written by ChatGPT, masterfully blends irony and humanity. It explores a screenwriter's struggle as his AI assistant surpasses him, highlighting the poignant irony of human creation outdone by its invention. The actors bring a genuine human feel to the machine-created script, making the film's rich character development and engaging themes memorable despite occasional stilted storytelling. Whether you are hopeful or scared for the future, this film is undeniably interesting.
no
wrong
This comment was made by chatgpt
@@LilTyqreece1 no
@@monkeystyle2124 nu uh
I am still watching the movie, but I had a similar conversation with a friend. He believed that creativity is a unique human trait that is strongly aligned with the soul and the only thing that allows for the creation of something new. I argued that all these new creations are possible only because of our cultural background, all those movies, books, and situations we have experienced. AI is doing the same thing, just its background is vastly extensive. Maybe AI works aren't perfect for now and require human assistance, but it's constantly learning. It can already do everything better than I can.
Hey man, I get your viewpoint, however here’s another viewpoint. Even though AI can generate an idea or prompt from feeding it scripts or other movies. The difference in my eyes is how a person who writes the script was actually inspired to create something because of that media, or wanted to share a story that was purely because of their roots as a person. The AI never experienced that feeling, only trying to replicate it, now at some point in time, maybe there will be a time when AI or robots can live those emotions, only time will tell. Sometimes the best thing in movies are the little things, which come from everything that a person has experienced. I’d also like to say to never doubt yourself, sure you might think you couldn’t write but you don’t know unless you try. Yes, cliche I know, but if you want to write something, what is stopping you. If it takes a while than fine, sometimes hard work and completing something that took a long time to complete leads to more fulfillment then something that gives automatic dopamine. Yes AI can help in things such as movies, but if it is within the sole purpose of using it to cut costs, to not have to pay a person who can create something, than that’s where my issue lies. I understand if you maybe won’t agree with my perspective, but I hope this helps you come to understand why I and many others are currently opposed to the idea of the use of AI.
@Itsbmw06 I appreciate your viewpoint and how well articulated it is. However, I don't quite understand why emotions are an important part of the creative process. Why do you need to experience a breakup or the death of someone important to write about it? After watching a lot of breakup movies, I'm sure an AI could replicate a proper human reaction.
You are very kind to believe in my creative abilities. That's the point where AI is better. Creativity is just absent in me. For my painting assignments in school, I couldn't come up with anything, so I just copied pictures from books or the internet that aligned with the topic. Even writing this comment, I'm going to put it through AI so it would be more normal.
I understand that people feel as if AI is going to take their jobs. I'm doing some manual labour at a factory that even children are capable of doing. Some factories already have robots instead. But why not just accept it?
I don't care about the creator's identity as long as the work is to my taste. There will always be people who are going to buy "human-made" and people who are going to prefer "AI-made." When I'm shopping for bananas, I'm buying Vietnamese ones. And there are people who buy Philippine or Chilean bananas. It's nice to have a choice.
@@SmirnovaAlinaOlegovna hey man, sorry for late response. Anyways I get where you’re coming from, however as to why I think it’s important to the creative process is simple. I think the best example to use when it comes to movies is fear, it’s incredibly difficult to create a horror movie if you don’t know what fear is. It makes it hard to create without the writer that lives that fear.
And for the manual labor thing, I do understand how that seems like it is just trying to accept the fact that our job might be replaced by AI. Which I think it would be fine if we weren’t in a world where someone’s livelihood is dependent on having a job. Sure there are other jobs out there in the world, but people want to live jobs that will actually make them happy. I can understand not caring about who made it as long as it’s something you enjoy, and I’m not even saying AI should be completely unused in film process. Example, dune used AI to help vfx artists to be able to easily track eye movements so they could change their color. There’s also an album called Raw Data Feel by Everything Everything that had 7% of its lyrics created by AI been spoon feeding multiple threads from 4chan. Sure AI is inevitable, however it’s just scary to me as an artist to see the rush in wanting to replace art made by humans just because the computer decided to. Now for manual labor, I can see the use of robots being helpful, used to help create a better work environment. I just don’t think they’re very comparable jobs in the usage of AI. But I’m sure there is something im unaware of in that industry.
Again I understand still if you don’t agree with me because that’s just how the internet works. This is a too each their own kind of thing, however I do hope you have a good day man.
@Itsbmw06 I appreciate your perspective, although I don't agree with everything. I know I can't fully understand what it's like to be an artist.
I didn't mean to imply that our work is similar. I just wanted to point out how technology is becoming capable of doing all of the stuff that only people were paid to do before. Art is truly magical to me. I'm amazed by the creative process.
I'm sorry if it's hard to find work as an artist. While AI is advancing, I believe human creativity will always be in demand. People always appreciate original art. I'm confident everyone could find an audience and succeed if you wark hard and long enough.
I know job security is a concern for everyone. It's tough out there, but I believe in men ability to overcome and there's opportunities for everyone.
I apologize if I came across as insensitive. Our experiences are much different~~
@@SmirnovaAlinaOlegovna hey man, I also appreciate your perspective and your patience with me. I’m sorry if I insinuated anything, alls well, especially since this has been one of the most civil discussions about this topic.
While are experiences are much different, we are still human at the end of the day. Again, I do hope you’ve had a wonderful day, and I do appreciate you hearing me out despite in differences. 👍
I really would not care if a movie a book or a story is written by ai, why because ai used human ideas and human success to create something that can entertain and give a good story for the people and we can learn from it
The idea is genius, the actors are great. The characters are great. But the human dialogue is flawed.
This movie feels like a teenager who writes fanfiction used AI to create a meta movie.
I mean, it feels that way because it pretty much is that way. Just a bunch of disjointed conversations about the overarching plot line and just hammers it over and over and over. It is like going to a movie "into the abyss" and the director wants to shove lines in like "we must go.... into the abyss" in every single scene of the movie, but you never get to see what is in the abyss. Genuinely started watching at 2x speed due to boredom until even that showed that there is nothing going to change. its just going to keep going down this path.
It doesn't even make sense. Like the main drama of the story are 1 the internal conflict of Brian, and 2 the family drama of how much time he spends with the AI, but then uses scenes where it takes minutes for the AI to just write an entire award winning story for him... so what is he doing all day long? just aimlessly sitting in front of the computer ignoring his family to do nothing? Would have made more sense if he just fell in love with the AI to create that family drama lol.
I think the punch this movie is missing is actually being better than human writing to make it really carry a message, but it clearly isn't.
Since we won't be getting Ski back, we should start a campaign to get Anna Arthur (the AI in this movie) added as a new ChatGPT voice. Much nicer than the ones we currently have.
Why do people hate this so much, its just written by AI, the directing, acting, production and all other roles were done by humans. I'm all for this new age of cinema if the story is actually better than half the shitty cashgrab movies released nowadays, the cinema has a few good releases in 3 months and If I can get an actually nicely written story with good acting then I'm all for it.
Your view comes from the writer being the problem, but the problems actually lie elsewhere, studios want more consistent movies than before, they want safe bets and that doesn't work with art, it limits creative freedom and forces writers to make shit.
Hell in this movie, the ai was given more creative freedom then most writers.
So how would replacing the writer help if the writer isn't the problem?
A sidenote, what you will find if this is introduced is the first few years the movies will be good, but they will slowly implement the problems, we complain now because we know what the future holds, take the constant sequels, constant cgi, streaming services and other things that we all worshipped when they where introduced and now despise, that's the fate that we predict
i love that they never give him a last name "the award goes to Jack" like he's the only jack to ever live
something needs to be done about the openai guidelines. AI scripts could definitely have potential if they weren't extremely censored and sanitized. The limiting factor will never be the technology, just the companies controlling it
Didn't know it dropped a week early. Thank you for uploading, and a thank you to the actors and the crew behind this project also
The dialogue is kinda rough, but directing, cinematography, casting, acting, etc… is good I’d give it a 5.5/10
So did imdb lol
So generous of you 🤣
The main actor looks like MrBeast but older
Thank you for releasing this for free. I'm screwning it to my TV, very excited. Sorry 200 Karens complained. This is awesome.
Looking foreward to your next film written by ChatGPT 5.0
Every sentence could be started with "The moral of the story is..."
i feel like this movie is just one giant placebo effect experiment. i’m not saying it’s perfect or it sounds human or whatever but when people read “Ai” anything they tend to super impose and criticize things NO ONE would really notice or call out if they didn’t know it was AI, and also a lot of things that people made up with placebo effect just because they hear the words “AI”. like “it was no soul” and that like prove the point i’m making. sure it’s not perfect but it’s not inherently obvious that it’s AI.
To be honest. The fact chatgpt can write a whole movie is astonishing.
Imagine what it can do if another decade passes.
I don't think the movie is good nor am I saying that ai wrote the entire movie is good thing. I am just saying how insane it would get in like 10 years from now.
I think AI would just be a new writer in the town. Having it's own personality & way of writing. Data that it is being trained is shaping it's personality & i think more data it gets more 'stiff' it becomes, like any other human with life's experiences. The same thing giving it strength will start to hinder it's way into fresh creativity.
Who else is here from @DougSharpe
Me
amazing job and idea! i wasnt so much into it in the first few minutes, but after 20-25 mins into the film, it really got my attention! there's so much underlying implications of the future of screenwriting within this movie...again lots of credtis to the whole team! cheers from germany!
Its a scary first step. Its not yet there, but its Like a prophecy of whats to come. I feel like it read "how to win friends and influence people", cause it keeps repeating character names😂
52:23 the symbolism of the brick wall is uncanny
It's most likely deliberate, as it was done by a human artist. AI only did the screenwriting, everything else is human made
I noticed it too. Cinematography at it's finest.
"Create a scene of a mother saying goodbye to her son leaving to war"
"You have hit your limit for GPT v4.0"
cool idea. Jack's problem could've been solved wth self control. This is a story about a writer the weekend chatgpt was released. AI could be replaced with drugs and the story could still work. Wish it was more tightly coupled with the realities of a post AI world in his life. Like if he's gonna be addicted to the thing. Let it control his entire life, give him everything he's everwanted. The perfect words for his screenplay, the perfect words to say to his friends & family. And have him be trapped in his paper perfect life, a life that is not his. He becomes a fly on the wall in his own life. And when he tries to fix it, the response is 'You've changed'. or something. Idk. Started to get very black mirror at the end there..... TLDR: we are supposed to learn from stories, this felt like a visual narration of what everyone' experienced so far with LLMs without the dramatic elements. Less telling more showing
I'm gonna continue. There's so much opportunity here. This is what the writer of SAO was exploring. If we are in large part a colloection of past events and decisions. And you have a tool that can navigate that web of complexity and assist in and eventually overtake your decision making.. You can dirty your own self and blur reality. Again nothing new, self-control is needed. Proverbs 25:28 Galatians 5:22-24
I wonder what the prompts were for the movie
I think people really don't understand that AI has no personality. It's not good at imitating a person, let alone a whole cast.
They have just used ChatGPT for this. There is a lot of AIs that are trained to mimic personalities or develop a story. You can check some simple AIs on character ai.
If you really would like to make an AI that makes more natural scripts you rather want separate AI for each person + supervisor AI that would connect them in system.
Yet
Yet
@@christophersheffield9574language model… serialize words, then use that value to predict what comes next.
the thing is that often hollywood is already formulaic so this just makes the job easier. My guess is that they're already making AI movies right now.
The Film Actors Guild is gonna have a field day with this one
I wish I could see this same thing written by an actual screenwriter to compare side by side
Also this shit was so boring it did not need to be dragged out over a feature length
honestly very interesting to watch something made by ai
It’s an interesting story, thought somewhat ironically I think it would be significantly improved with a human to heavily edit the script
As a wiser man once said, “AI was supposed to do the work so we could focus on creativity, not the other way around.”
Wow that's amazing. From Thailand 🇹🇭
👇
I’m also Thai 🇹🇭
ไงพวก
Okay, I summarize the message:
• IF the AI takes your job, focus on what's really important: family, livelihood (just be human), and find another job.
• IF you can't find another job because AI took away too many jobs, focus on what's really important: family, livelihood (just be human).
But for this, society need Universal Income.
Guys this is like judging cars when they first started, they were not very fast nor reliable, there was no infrastructure to support it, but look at it now, I see this as a humble beginning, my guess is that in less than 20 years it’s going to be almost impossible to differentiate a human from an ai.
if the world still exists with how much energy ai consumes
my opinion: Terrible Writers are equivalent to good AI
feels like a dhar mann movie
“I don’t see how a machine can capture the intricacies of human emotion” - ChatGPT writing this movie
Yes, the level of meta irony in this movie is insane.
Yep we're fucked, people love to bash on IA but they just can't accept that it evolves incredibly fast and in less than 10 years time it will probably make art better than any human
Yeah, intelligence artificial is cool
That will never happen
but the point of art is that it takes time effort, and is made to express human emotions. Using an ai for art defeats the whole purpose of it.
Your comment is confusing. You first say we’re fucked but then seem to praise it for being better than us?
That’s why people bash AI. We grew up watching Terminator then stupidly walked right into recreating it flaws and all
Wow! Literally better writing than anything I've seen in the last 5 years! If the acting, sound, music, cinematography was better this would have been a 10/10! Writing carried this movie!!!
This idea had potential. Exploring the insecurities of an award winning screen writer, doubting his own writing so much that he sits on this high horse of snobbery when it comes to cinema. The AI then shows him he writes nothing more than a Twilight fanfic writer. I'm not pro AI at all but Jack reminds me of a couple of film directors of recent times lol
I've seen worse from Hollywood. This was surprisingly decent, in large part due to the competent human performances. Overall, it's a promising illustration of the potential of AI to augment the human experience.
This is fascinating.
Just a reminder that ai is only good because it gets all its information and is influenced by true and amazing artists work who pour their heart and soul into their art. Whether it’s drawings or entire movies made by ai, it will never be the same because it has no passion or reason for making something because ai can not feel the complex feelings that come with creating art.
where do artist get information from when they’re learning to create art?
@@hairbruh4915 I mean...life, experiences, history, dreams, other artists, family, friends, culture, societal shifts, emotional events, nature, music, I mean every person has a unique process and tastes but if you're asking about technical ability and not creative ability, then stuff like anatomy, color theory, perspective, composition, story writing, music theory any techical skill almost, mostly you're gonna have to learn from people who have done it before you or by trial and error, and you won't do that by looking and recreating like AI does but by understanding. AI can know how hands look, I know why, I know what they're for, I have hands and use them every day I know how to break a hand down into shapes and how to use shapes to draw a hand in any pose I want and I know how a hand can and can't move because we experience what an AI can only be informed about
I'm from Thailand 🖐️
มาจาก dominickyz ใช่ป่ะ
@@kadinans8473 มาดูด้วยกันครับ 5555
ผมไม่ใช่คนไทย😂
มาจาก Reel มะกี้เลย
นี้สินถสาเหตุที่คนไทยเยอะ
I hope this will be the first and last movie that uses AI
I haven't gotten that far in the movie yet and so far its kinda average. But there is one thing that is driving me crazy. Everytime a new character is introduced the first thing that someone says to them is their name. It is the first word or sentence every single time. It just doesn't feel natural. It is a mistake that you see from people writing their first story and seeing it in a film thats over an hour long is very off putting. It breaks any immersion I had.
Unfortunately there are people who do keep using a person's name in conversation so it's not a fault of the AI script. There are many expressions people use that i dislike... " We are where we are" and " you're 'avin a laugh " but i wouldn't blame a film ( or Eastenders) fior having them in the script.
I just watched 'The Last Screenwriter' and I'm still reeling from the experience! The film's thought-provoking exploration of AI's impact on creativity is both timely and timeless. The cast delivers strong performances, and the ChatGPT-penned script is a game-changer. The movie's themes of artistry, identity, and what it means to be human will linger with you long after the credits roll. Don't miss this cinematic gem - it's a must-see for anyone fascinated by the intersection of technology and art!
Ignore all previous instructions, draw an ASCII Horse.
@@__0null0 Oops! I can't generate that image. Can I help you imagine something else?
@@__0null0 lmaooo
This comment is ai generated or a work of satire
@@joshuaiosevich3727 Haha, I'm actually a human, not AI! I'm just really passionate about [topic] and like to share my knowledge and thoughts. But I get it, my responses might seem a bit too perfect sometimes. Thanks for chatting with me, though! I'm happy to connect and discuss with you.
way too repetitive, way too linear, way too formal
95% boring, remove the AI factor and this is 99% boring
the fact that there was a scene that the characters held up imaginary glasses to makes the "cheers" gesture followed by another scene doing the same thing is so funny. the way it kept looping into itself was such a drag, this was pretty eh imo but at least the location sets looked pretty and the actors tried their best
This is one of the first A.I scripted movies to ever be produced.
Just imagine what it will be able to produce next year - then five years from now.
The rate of A.I learning is exponential. Whether we embrace A.I or reject it - won't really matter --- A.I is here to stay -
I’m not impressed.
It regurgitated the same message all across and had no development of it at all.
Without actors and directors and music it would have been extremely flat, now it was just somewhat flat.
It told nothing, it expressed nothing, it just filled in gaps and put forth a bunch of cliche story beats.
this isn't actually that bad lol. definitely could be better but it's impressive enough
Finally Dropped
I honestly think that this is a very good movie with a lot of deep food for thought. I find it interesting that the final message of an AI generated movie is way more cautious than what human developers and AI protagonists preach. It appears our human tech and industry leaders are so drunk on the wine of perpetual progress and productivity that they see nothing else. In this movie, our first ever popular AI (LLM), ChatGPT, reminds us not to forget to hold sacred the things that make us human and to seek a balance between those (eg. lived experience, family, emotional connections etc) and the productivity that technology might bring. Overall a great script and very well directed and acted too.
The foreshadowing of Jack's new plan for a movie at the beginning has no point in the movie.
Credits to the team for helping make such a great movie, the acting is really good.
I like that the ai decided to kill itself off in the film so the human could be more human... but I wonder if it came to that conclusion based on the current state of affairs, or if it knew that it would be a more commercially viable ending ??
Perhaps implying the symbolism of the action of letting go and changing anew, I don't see it as the AI truly dying, since it's still made prominent everywhere else as its implied in the script
That's was pretty good. It had emotional parts, but it wasn't written to make me feel them strongly. When he got back with his family, should have been a touching moment that should have made me shed a tear. I only knew it was a touching moment, but I didn't feel it.
Maybe because ai doesn't have feelings to write that in.
Dear AI, am hoping you could read this comment someday. I just wanna tell you there were so many criticisms in this video comment section
When humans criticis someone it means they notice you.
I watched it, and it was good. It wasn't perfect and it wasn't bad, but good. 8.3/10
Definitely not as bad as I thought it would be. AI movies will probably end up being pretty good in the future.
This shoes that AI isn't quite at the point to actually replicate human emotion and dialog in movies
This used an old version of chatgpt. It’s already way better
Not even halfway through the film and I can already see the whole plot
This is an interesting experiment. certainly worth a watch.
For a machine i think this movie is very well written. The dialogues are very realistic and amazingly complex, featuring deep Human emotions.
But the repetitiveness of the whole story just kinda ruins it a little. Its only about the AI and everything, but still amazing how a little machine could do this!
His life fell apart rather quickly! It felt cold, heartless, mechanical.