I don't know why this Turkish thing for the Scythians? It is very well documented that the Scythians were Caucasian and the original Turks had a Mongolian phenotype, as the more organized Turkish tribes began to expand westwards they mixed with Iranians from Central Asia and the Iranian plateau, there is no dishonor in having arrived later and have conquered
And I don't get this "Turks were Mongolian thing". We weren't Mongolians, nor were Mongolians Turks; we just lived close together once and our common ancestral background is probably old enough to not be relevant for having the same ethnic classification.
@@najibullahghafori3739 as in the term "mongoloid", like how "caucasoid" means any ethnicity regarded as "white"? If so, then I see your point, but even then "Mongolian" isn't exactly the right word in this context.
@@Sonilotos Yeah I know I picked it right? Doesn’t mean I’m a pan-Turkish nutcase like the others in this comment section. The “Arya” in my name is Iranian and Indo-Aryan but I’m sure you had no clue what that means because all you give af about are Turks
🇬🇪 Video is wrong when it comes to Alans/Ossetians, They weren't in modern Georgian territory "South Ossetia" until 12th century after mongols and timurids killed lot of their population they migrated into the mountains of the central Caucasus and gradually started migration to the south, Then in 17th century pressured by Kabardians and Circassians (Also maybe Vaynakhs) second wave of ossetian migration started, They migrated from north caucasus to kingdom of kartli - "Ossetian peasants, who were migrating to the mountainous areas of the South Caucasus, often settled in the lands of Georgian feudal lords, The Georgian King of the Kingdom of Kartli permitted Ossetians to immigrate. According to Russian ambassador to Georgia Mikhail Tatishchev, at the beginning of the 17th century there was already a small group of Ossetians living near the headwaters of the Great Liakhvi. In the 1770s there were more Ossetians living in Kartli than ever before." The Baltic German explorer Johann Anton Güldenstädt called modern "North Ossetia" - Alania simply Ossetia, while he wrote that Kartli (the areas of modern-day South Ossetia) was populated by Georgians and the mountainous areas were populated by both Georgians and Ossetians. By the end of 18th century, the ultimate sites of Ossetian settlement on the territory of modern South Ossetia were in Kudaro (Jejora river estuary), Greater Liakhvi gorge, the gorge of Little Liakhvi, Ksani River gorge, Guda (Tetri Aragvi estuary) and Truso (Terek estuary). "South Ossetia" is and always will be Georgian territory (I love my ossetian brothers and I myself am 25% Ossetian but true history must not be hiden) 🇬🇪
According to scientific sources, Dostum, the separation of Kurdish from Iranian languages was 2000 years ago, at most in the 2nd century AD. Also, it is not reasonable for the Balochi language to be a separate language at such an early date. Baluch people came to Balochistan region in the 10th or 11th centuries.
You delayed Kurdish expansion too much. Northern Transeuphratia was ruled by Iranian empires for a thousand years by the 7th century AD. Yet only then it spreads? Doesn't make sense.
Correct me if I wrong but I have the following findings: Pashto is more akin to Scythian/Saka in vocabulary according to reconstruction from Greek sources. Sogdian's modern progeny is Yaghnoobi that means Pamiri languages. As for Bacterian, Ormur or Barki, another Eastern Iranian language spoken in Waziristan, Pakistan & parts of Afghanistan, seems to be the closest successor of as many of the customs of Greco Bacterians were introduced in Waziristan like the Pakol cap aka Greek Kousia by the Bacterian migrants, the ancestors of Ormur nation.
@muhammadshehreyarkhan1851 ur right to some extent but u have remember that that ancestors of bactrians and and the scythians come from the same branch. Which makes them relatives but the difference is that bactrians settled way earlier in afghanistan while the scythians came later. Both groups prolly spoke a related language well understood by one another. Also ormuri and parachi languages are infact the closest to pashto
Mitanni were indo-aryan, not iranian (and they were assimilated quickly by Hurrites anyways, we only know their origin because of indo-aryan loanwords in Hurrite)
"Iranian" is a completely misleading label. It suggests these languages came from current Iran. Sintashtian, Andronovan or Scythian would be more accurate.
Iran is literally the term that included all those peoples since ancient times Even the Sassanids officially referred to their state as Eranshahr (Great Iran)
Теперь понятно почему в южном Казахстане есть древние города, такие как Тараз, Туркестан, Шымкент - это наследие друго более древней цивилизации. А города и кочевники это оксюморон
Iranic origin of Medes is NOT proved. There are no texts in Median language, only few words that are possibly borrowed from Easten Iranic dialects. There is not enough evidential base to conclude that Medes were Iranic by origin. Also there are theories about non-Turkic Turanic origin of this people, possibly Fins or something.
At that time, most Mongolians had forgotten their Mongolian culture because they had become Turkified and Islamized, but the Turks only had serious influence in military matters.
Wrong maps Until 1550s Kurdish was not in the west of Tigris, North of Van Lake. Kurdish speakers neighboring modern Armenian borders in 1150s is not true. Kurdish expansion into Armenian Highlands is recent (especially after Armenian events in Turkey). Until 1990s Azerbaijani Turks were majority in Igdir and Turkish nationalist Party was winner of the votes there. So Kurds becoming neighbor to Armenia is very new. Zazaki, as a part of Caspian Group was well established in Eastern Anatolia around 1300s, way before Kurdish and you do not show Zazaki in any form. In 1100s modern Turkmenistan lands was free from Iranian speakers except some city centers. Uzbekistan and Khorasm were completely Turkicized except Samarqand and Bukhara and some other city centers. Baluch speakers were present in Kerman, Hormozgan and Khorasan. All of them were pushed back to Sistan around 1600s and 1700s. They were Persianized in Kerman, Hormozgan and parts of modern western Pakistan turned into Baluch speakers. It is well known that there were also Ossetian islands in places like Circassia, Dagestan and northern Caucasia, apart from main Osssetian speakers and they were not assimilated until 1500s. So wrong maps full of misinformation.
Contrary to what you say, Kurdish history is much older. As a neighbor of Armenia, look at Kurdish history in the Middle East. resources ---------------- The Shaddadids were a Sunni Muslim dynasty of Kurdish origin.[a][4][3] who ruled in various parts of Armenia and Arran from 951 to 1199 AD. They were established in Dvin. Through their long tenure in Armenia, they often intermarried with the Bagratuni royal family of Armenia. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaddadids ----------------------- Rawwadid, Ravvadid (also Revend or Revendi), or Banū Rawwād (Arabic: بنو رَوّاد) (955-1071) was a Sunni Muslim Kurdish[1][4] dynasty, centered in the northwestern region of Adharbayjan (Azerbaijan) between the late 8th and early 13th centuries.[1] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rawadid_dynasty ----------------------- You Turks can never make a false history in the Middle East because the Middle East is not your land. You came from the Altai Mountains and Siberia
@@rozhmokurd No, Turkish history is very old and do you believe in the Indo-European theory and think that you are a native of Mesopotamia? You Kurds are not native to Mesopotamia, you migrated to Mesopotamia from Eastern Europe later. Shaddadi and Rawvadi emirates are also Arab, not Kurdish.
@empirehistoria6598 I have a reason. Civilizations came from Africa and then Egypt and Mesopotamia and Iran. Then they spread to Europe and Eastern Asia. Scientists said.
@empirehistoria6598 How could people of Iran come from Russia where it's cold. Civilizations are near rivers, not in places that ate cold like Degle and Forat. Nile River. Karun river. That's why even the migration of Aryas from Russia is False. Western historians made that up to say all civilizations came from Europe and they are superior
It is extremely chauvinistic to label these languages with the name of Iran. These languages did not originate from Iran at all. Persian who migrated from Central Asia brought Persian language to West Asia!
The name Iran comes from the ancient term Aryan which was used as a label by peoples of Central Asia. Parsi, Farsi or Persian was created later when the Aryan/Iranian people split into many different groups.
@@empirehistoria6598 What you wrote does not invalidate my argument. It is extremely chauvinistic to label other languages in Central Asia as "iranic languages". Actually, modern day Iran itself had accepted their own language from migration of Proto-Indians from Central Asia to the South.
@@TerrorbelliDecuspacis-w5f All iranian speaking people originally called themselves and their language Aryan/Iran. Proto-Indians or Dravidians did not come from central asia. I think you are confusing them with Indo-Aryans.
@@empirehistoria6598 The Proto-Indo-Iranian culture, which gave rise to the Indo-Aryans and Iranians, developed on the Central Asian steppes north of the Caspian Sea as the Sintashta culture (c. 2200-1900 BCE), in present-day Russia and Kazakhstan, and developed further as the Andronovo culture (2000-1450 BCE). It does not make sense to use "iranic" or "iranian" for defining the languages which had actually existed long before the emergence of word "iran"
@@TerrorbelliDecuspacis-w5f The Proto-Indo-Iranian culture is called Aryan aka Iran. Historians and Linguists no longer use the term Aryan because of world war 2 events.
@@Adil_Turysbek_TVRC blond indoeuropeans conquared nearly all Asia. Nothing to do withe turk. Self saka 2023 proven iranic. They found bilingual Text. Nobody says wusun turks😂😂😂😂😂
@@Crxyzen doğu asya değil hem orta asya diyorsunuz Türklerin ana vatanı için hem de işinize gelmedi mi doğu asya diyorsunuz. iranın tarihi kitapların da bile Türklerin ata toprağının batı asya tarafını dahil ediyor yani gösteriyor.
I don't know why this Turkish thing for the Scythians?
It is very well documented that the Scythians were Caucasian and the original Turks had a Mongolian phenotype, as the more organized Turkish tribes began to expand westwards they mixed with Iranians from Central Asia and the Iranian plateau, there is no dishonor in having arrived later and have conquered
And I don't get this "Turks were Mongolian thing". We weren't Mongolians, nor were Mongolians Turks; we just lived close together once and our common ancestral background is probably old enough to not be relevant for having the same ethnic classification.
You are neither Aryan nor iranic, if you are not mongols you are their cousins. Watch Turkic language history. @@Sonilotos
Not the Scythians in Siberia
@@Sonilotos by mongolian, looking asian is implied, not that turks were exactly mongolians
@@najibullahghafori3739 as in the term "mongoloid", like how "caucasoid" means any ethnicity regarded as "white"? If so, then I see your point, but even then "Mongolian" isn't exactly the right word in this context.
3:16-4:59 You forgot to put Old Azari, an Iranian language descended from Median spoken in Iranian Azerbaijan before being displaced by Turkic.
Old Azeri part of Caspian Language(s)
@@empirehistoria6598It is still indo-Iranian language
@@xshandy5812 It is shown under Caspian group
@@empirehistoria6598 yes it was AdurbadGan
Grettings from morroco to Iranian brothers and sisters🇲🇦🤝❤️🇮🇷
I love Berber culture, it reminds me of our mountain tribes
Congrats to morocco for saving the berber identity from pan-arab
@@scarymonster5541 thank you brother and as a morrocan berber i will preserve my berber origin and identity too
Here before than Turkish Nonsenses
What?
Haha, couldn’t agree more! :)
@@AryaOghuz your name literally has Oghuz in it (Oğuz, the Turkic group)
@@Sonilotos Yeah I know I picked it right? Doesn’t mean I’m a pan-Turkish nutcase like the others in this comment section. The “Arya” in my name is Iranian and Indo-Aryan but I’m sure you had no clue what that means because all you give af about are Turks
@@Sonilotos just a name does'nt explain all your identity
🇬🇪 Video is wrong when it comes to Alans/Ossetians, They weren't in modern Georgian territory "South Ossetia" until 12th century after mongols and timurids killed lot of their population they migrated into the mountains of the central Caucasus and gradually started migration to the south, Then in 17th century pressured by Kabardians and Circassians (Also maybe Vaynakhs) second wave of ossetian migration started, They migrated from north caucasus to kingdom of kartli - "Ossetian peasants, who were migrating to the mountainous areas of the South Caucasus, often settled in the lands of Georgian feudal lords, The Georgian King of the Kingdom of Kartli permitted Ossetians to immigrate. According to Russian ambassador to Georgia Mikhail Tatishchev, at the beginning of the 17th century there was already a small group of Ossetians living near the headwaters of the Great Liakhvi. In the 1770s there were more Ossetians living in Kartli than ever before."
The Baltic German explorer Johann Anton Güldenstädt called modern "North Ossetia" - Alania simply Ossetia, while he wrote that Kartli (the areas of modern-day South Ossetia) was populated by Georgians and the mountainous areas were populated by both Georgians and Ossetians.
By the end of 18th century, the ultimate sites of Ossetian settlement on the territory of modern South Ossetia were in Kudaro (Jejora river estuary), Greater Liakhvi gorge, the gorge of Little Liakhvi, Ksani River gorge, Guda (Tetri Aragvi estuary) and Truso (Terek estuary).
"South Ossetia" is and always will be Georgian territory (I love my ossetian brothers and I myself am 25% Ossetian but true history must not be hiden) 🇬🇪
Incredible video ❤
Bravo
Love you from Iran
Nice job.
Ossetians(Alans)are the last still standing of all Sarmatians...
В Узбекистане ещё 11 миллион носителей персидского языка
это неправильно
This is impressive but you forgot Yaghnobi
According to scientific sources, Dostum, the separation of Kurdish from Iranian languages was 2000 years ago, at most in the 2nd century AD. Also, it is not reasonable for the Balochi language to be a separate language at such an early date. Baluch people came to Balochistan region in the 10th or 11th centuries.
Make One on aryan languages as well
Soon
Perfect
You delayed Kurdish expansion too much. Northern Transeuphratia was ruled by Iranian empires for a thousand years by the 7th century AD. Yet only then it spreads? Doesn't make sense.
Media Empire kurdish Family gutiom too kurdish ❤️
+Baluchi
Caspian languages now named gilaki and talishi
where is lurish?
Median kurdish
5:25 weird kurdish just appear in north east of iran .
It's because Shah Abbas of Safavid Iran located 1000s of Kurds in the region to defend the border against Turkic tribes.
@@Giga-cat-c6b
ahhhh i see that makes sense. thank you for explaining.
@@Giga-cat-c6b fuck him,we must struggle because of 20m kurd in our country
No it was because Median was Kurdish
No it was because Median was Kurdish
Make more of these !
Pashto and pamiri languages = Bactrian
so sad huge chunk of bactrian got persianized, does that mean tajiks of Afghanistan are persianized pashtuns( bactrians ) ?
@@najibullahghafori3739 of course. They still use pashto words in dari
Correct me if I wrong but I have the following findings: Pashto is more akin to Scythian/Saka in vocabulary according to reconstruction from Greek sources.
Sogdian's modern progeny is Yaghnoobi that means Pamiri languages.
As for Bacterian, Ormur or Barki, another Eastern Iranian language spoken in Waziristan, Pakistan & parts of Afghanistan, seems to be the closest successor of as many of the customs of Greco Bacterians were introduced in Waziristan like the Pakol cap aka Greek Kousia by the Bacterian migrants, the ancestors of Ormur nation.
@muhammadshehreyarkhan1851 ur right to some extent but u have remember that that ancestors of bactrians and and the scythians come from the same branch. Which makes them relatives but the difference is that bactrians settled way earlier in afghanistan while the scythians came later. Both groups prolly spoke a related language well understood by one another. Also ormuri and parachi languages are infact the closest to pashto
Nope. The Tajiks are actually the closest cultural and linguist descendants of the bactrians
I think you have confused Kurds with Turks. If you don't know the history of the Kurds, read the history of Mitanni and Xenophon's travelogue
Kurd not history
Mitanni were indo-aryan, not iranian (and they were assimilated quickly by Hurrites anyways, we only know their origin because of indo-aryan loanwords in Hurrite)
These are very wrong chronological calculations.
"Iranian" is a completely misleading label. It suggests these languages came from current Iran. Sintashtian, Andronovan or Scythian would be more accurate.
Iran is an ancient term meaning Aryan. All these different cultures originally called themselves Aryan or Iranian
Iran is literally the term that included all those peoples since ancient times
Even the Sassanids officially referred to their state as Eranshahr (Great Iran)
Throw in some music for your next video! 🎵
Talysh language?
Under Caspian Language Group
Bro talysh is also one of the Iranian languages, it is obvious @@empirehistoria6598
There are Talysh speakers in Azerbaijan.
You forgot old Azer and Zazaki
iranshahr🦁☀️❇️🦅
u gotta work on ur editing skills bro this video flashed every second and you need to ad music to this its nearly 7 minutes long bro
Теперь понятно почему в южном Казахстане есть древние города, такие как Тараз, Туркестан, Шымкент - это наследие друго более древней цивилизации. А города и кочевники это оксюморон
Not a good map. It does not cover iranian languages in Austria and hungary
Can you name those languages?
@@empirehistoria6598 sarmatian, alan languages like jasz
Great Tajikistan🇹🇯 🇰🇬🇰🇿🇦🇫🇺🇿🇹🇲
Med 🦅PART🦅
Turks weren't mentioned even once in the video yet the entire comment section is arguing about them? Come on guys, just calm down.
Turks literally having a role in 1/4 of the iranian history,someone denies someone saying more.
@@SmokeyMountain0 the Seljuks come to mind
baloch😎✌🏻
I am also Baloch 🇵🇰🗿🗿
@@SumairKhoso-sc1sg Take the flag of Pakistan, you are not Baloch🇵🇰❌❌
@@SumairKhoso-sc1sg🤟🔥
@@SumairKhoso-sc1sgbased Baloch 🇵🇰🗿
@@nazila000 we Pakistan are Baloch 🇵🇰 Pakistan is ower country 80 percent Baloch are Pakistani 🇵🇰🗿🗿🗿
Gorani and Sorani ?
No to Turks and Mongols
Iranic origin of Medes is NOT proved. There are no texts in Median language, only few words that are possibly borrowed from Easten Iranic dialects. There is not enough evidential base to conclude that Medes were Iranic by origin. Also there are theories about non-Turkic Turanic origin of this people, possibly Fins or something.
All existing evidence points to it being Iranian. Other theories have little to no proof
The Medes were an Iranian people and we Kurds are an Iranian people.
We're was mongol and Turkish influence there???
At that time, most Mongolians had forgotten their Mongolian culture because they had become Turkified and Islamized, but the Turks only had serious influence in military matters.
so on the map you can see the influence, everything became Turkic.
Lurish language in the west and southwestern Iran isn't Persian. It is a separate language.
Luri language descended from Middle Persian. It is a dialect
@@frozenstorm158 sh/+ut up
@@lurilanguage راست میگه
لری از پارسیگ (فارسی میانه) منشعب شده
Pashto ❤
Kurdistan ❤
Great Tajik
west azarbaijan is not kurdistan.
Ne bati azerisi ne anlatıyorsun turklesmis fars.
Bizim topragimiza göz diktin.
Azerbaycan tekrar iranilesecek.
Whole of Azerbayjan is Iran
Wrong maps
Until 1550s Kurdish was not in the west of Tigris, North of Van Lake. Kurdish speakers neighboring modern Armenian borders in 1150s is not true. Kurdish expansion into Armenian Highlands is recent (especially after Armenian events in Turkey). Until 1990s Azerbaijani Turks were majority in Igdir and Turkish nationalist Party was winner of the votes there. So Kurds becoming neighbor to Armenia is very new.
Zazaki, as a part of Caspian Group was well established in Eastern Anatolia around 1300s, way before Kurdish and you do not show Zazaki in any form.
In 1100s modern Turkmenistan lands was free from Iranian speakers except some city centers.
Uzbekistan and Khorasm were completely Turkicized except Samarqand and Bukhara and some other city centers.
Baluch speakers were present in Kerman, Hormozgan and Khorasan. All of them were pushed back to Sistan around 1600s and 1700s. They were Persianized in Kerman, Hormozgan and parts of modern western Pakistan turned into Baluch speakers.
It is well known that there were also Ossetian islands in places like Circassia, Dagestan and northern Caucasia, apart from main Osssetian speakers and they were not assimilated until 1500s.
So wrong maps full of misinformation.
Sources?
@@empirehistoria6598 Read Marco polo and other travellers. Armenian and Arab sources give valuable information about demographics of the time.
Uhm no
Contrary to what you say, Kurdish history is much older. As a neighbor of Armenia, look at Kurdish history in the Middle East.
resources
----------------
The Shaddadids were a Sunni Muslim dynasty of Kurdish origin.[a][4][3] who ruled in various parts of Armenia and Arran from 951 to 1199 AD. They were established in Dvin. Through their long tenure in Armenia, they often intermarried with the Bagratuni royal family of Armenia.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaddadids
-----------------------
Rawwadid, Ravvadid (also Revend or Revendi), or Banū Rawwād (Arabic: بنو رَوّاد) (955-1071) was a Sunni Muslim Kurdish[1][4] dynasty, centered in the northwestern region of Adharbayjan (Azerbaijan) between the late 8th and early 13th centuries.[1]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rawadid_dynasty
-----------------------
You Turks can never make a false history in the Middle East because the Middle East is not your land. You came from the Altai Mountains and Siberia
@@rozhmokurd No, Turkish history is very old and do you believe in the Indo-European theory and think that you are a native of Mesopotamia? You Kurds are not native to Mesopotamia, you migrated to Mesopotamia from Eastern Europe later. Shaddadi and Rawvadi emirates are also Arab, not Kurdish.
Iranian language came from western iran not Russia.😂
Sources?
@empirehistoria6598
I have a reason.
Civilizations came from Africa and then Egypt and Mesopotamia and Iran.
Then they spread to Europe and Eastern Asia.
Scientists said.
@empirehistoria6598
How could people of Iran come from Russia where it's cold.
Civilizations are near rivers, not in places that ate cold like Degle and Forat. Nile River. Karun river.
That's why even the migration of Aryas from Russia is False.
Western historians made that up to say all civilizations came from Europe and they are superior
@@MohamadrezaSohrabi-c5t This video is about Iranians not early humans. Indo-European expansion started from modern Russia/Ukraine
@@empirehistoria6598
Proof?
It is extremely chauvinistic to label these languages with the name of Iran. These languages did not originate from Iran at all. Persian who migrated from Central Asia brought Persian language to West Asia!
The name Iran comes from the ancient term Aryan which was used as a label by peoples of Central Asia. Parsi, Farsi or Persian was created later when the Aryan/Iranian people split into many different groups.
@@empirehistoria6598 What you wrote does not invalidate my argument. It is extremely chauvinistic to label other languages in Central Asia as "iranic languages". Actually, modern day Iran itself had accepted their own language from migration of Proto-Indians from Central Asia to the South.
@@TerrorbelliDecuspacis-w5f All iranian speaking people originally called themselves and their language Aryan/Iran. Proto-Indians or Dravidians did not come from central asia. I think you are confusing them with Indo-Aryans.
@@empirehistoria6598 The Proto-Indo-Iranian culture, which gave rise to the Indo-Aryans and Iranians, developed on the Central Asian steppes north of the Caspian Sea as the Sintashta culture (c. 2200-1900 BCE), in present-day Russia and Kazakhstan, and developed further as the Andronovo culture (2000-1450 BCE).
It does not make sense to use "iranic" or "iranian" for defining the languages which had actually existed long before the emergence of word "iran"
@@TerrorbelliDecuspacis-w5f The Proto-Indo-Iranian culture is called Aryan aka Iran. Historians and Linguists no longer use the term Aryan because of world war 2 events.
There are turkish area !!!
6:05 pahlavis changed Ahwaz population
For good
This maps are full of wrongs
CADUSIAN - MEDIAN - CASPIAN 🇦🇿 TALISH ❤️
Fake information !
Example?
@@empirehistoria6598 for example even in 1 AD south West of iran speak Elamite and mabye kassite language ( Elimais period )
LoL Caspian and Saka not İranian
Source?
@@empirehistoria6598 It would be a Talysh Gilaki pattern, but the Caspian are not Iranian
@@empirehistoria6598 Even now, if you ask the Sakas, they will say that they are Turks.
@@Kafkaz_Khwarezm_Turkic still haven't mentioned a credible source.
@@empirehistoria6598 Yes, you could not provide a safe source.
Indo Iranian people are hindu 🕉️ or not
hinduism is a dravidian religion. Aryans worshiped indo-european religion
Hinduism originated in South Asia meanwhile the Indo-Iranians followed religion similar to their ancestral Indo-European one
we iranic arians were zoarastrian
@@najibullahghafori3739 nope. Iranians originally followed pagan religion which was destroyed by later Iranian zoarastrians
@@frozenstorm158 those were not iranians, they were people living in the area before our arrival
Map is wrong and folse
Where? mr clown?
@@H4PKOM4H_hi in caucasus mr narkoman
This map is ridiculous. In the past, where Indo-Iran first emerged, there were Turks in that region a long time ago.
@IRANIAN7000Turks (Huns) entered Sogdiana 1 century bce. Wusun (Turks) entered Jetisý region 2 century bce.
Türkler sonradan batı asyaya göç etti, o bölgedeki irani halklar ya asimile oldular ya da yok oldular. Türklerin ana vatanı doğu asya
@@Adil_Turysbek_TVRC blond indoeuropeans conquared nearly all Asia. Nothing to do withe turk. Self saka 2023 proven iranic. They found bilingual Text. Nobody says wusun turks😂😂😂😂😂
@IRANIAN_IR224turks sad because indoeuropeans Like scyhtians and tocharians ruled them tousend of years in Bronze and ironages 😂😂😂😂
@@Crxyzen doğu asya değil hem orta asya diyorsunuz Türklerin ana vatanı için hem de işinize gelmedi mi doğu asya diyorsunuz. iranın tarihi kitapların da bile Türklerin ata toprağının batı asya tarafını dahil ediyor yani gösteriyor.