The Houthi's Attacks Are Getting Deadlier...
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 июл 2024
- 3:47 Houthis conduct first ever Unmanned Sub attack on US Navy near Yemen.
Houthi forces inflict significant damage to cargo ship Rubymar causing the crew to abandon ship. After a very busy weekend for the US Navy, Houthis launch both Unmanned Surface Vehicles and Unmanned Submersible Vehicles at the US Navy fleet.
📫 Contact Gene Dayhaw gene@solaromgmt.com for paid promotion.
🐦► / subbrief
🕺► / subbrief
⏰► / subbrief
😃► / subbriefmedia
🏴☠️► www.SubBrief.com
💵► / subbrief
🔗► / aaron-amick-9538a4171
💌 Contact Aaron ► Aaron@subbrief.com
🦃 Jive Turkey / @jiveturkey1
Chapters:
0:00 Rubymar attacked and abandoned
3:50 Unmanned Sub Attack on US Navy
Aaron's PC Spec
------------------------
CPU: Intel i9-10850K @3.60GHz
RAM: 64GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
Accelsior 4M2 16.0TB PCIe M.2 NVMe SSD
sub brief, sme, subject matter expert, naval, policy, technology, tactical use of the ocean, sonar, submarine tactics, weapons employment, aip, air independent power, 21st century, aaron, amick, aaron amick, sonar, sonarman, sme, SME, subject matter expert, naval, games, wargames, testing, tactics, news, history, tactical use of the ocean, hide, find, search, jive turkey, jive, subbrief,
A smart viewer has informed me that a ship was abandoned and retaken earlier in this conflict. Thank you and this is why this is the most informed audience on RUclips.
Please understand that my answer to some questions here may lead to aiding the Houthis so I am not ignoring your post. I am not answering you so as not to help the Houthis get better.
That's because we support your efforts to always provide the most up-to-date and accurate information about all naval surface vessels and the ones beneath the surface. Thanks for the fine videos you and your team produce Aaron!
Iran is the TOP STATE SPONSOR of TERRORISM IN THE WORLD, that's according to the U.S. Dept. of State and CIA Factbook for the last 30+ years. So why in the hell did Obama secretly (story broke months later) ship them $1.8 BILLION in CASH and free up another $250+ BILLION in long JUSTIFIABLY FROZEN assets. Joe Biden followed that with another $100+ BILLION to Iran in the last couple years.
WHY is OUR??? Government FUNDING the TOP STATE SPONSOR of TERRORISM IN THE WORLD????
I don't think it matters , if IRGC is advising them
Are you sure the grain shipment was hit by the Houthis? Or, could it have been hit by the coalition while making it seem as if it were hit by the Houthis?
@@AbeTheFakeSage WHY?? Ridiculous. This is "conspiracy theory".
Remember never interrupt the enemy when he's making a mistake ........ It's bad manners.
You say mistake, but failure is often times the step to success. Ukraine's first attempts with USVs UUVs did not succeed. Some washed up on the beach. Now they kill ships.
@LackofFaithify 👋 👋 Hi Napoleon Moskva must be damn cold this time of the year. You must be freezing your little frenchies off about now. Try and stay warm and work on limiting your mistakes lord knows I'm not going to be accessed of bad manners. 😇
@@rupturedduck6981 How is accusing the Ukrainians of evolving a successful weapon capable of sinking ships bad manners? Also, Moskva was not destroyed by Ukrainian USVs, it was by their anti-ship missile. So you try and stay illiterate.
@@rupturedduck6981 Also, thank you for proving my point. Hubris and stupidity go hand in hand.
@LackofFaithify I don't know what you are talking about I never once mentioned the Ukrainians and FYI Mockva is the Russian pronunciation for Moscow.
If the US military can't subdue the Talibans in 20 years, what makes them think they can defeat the Houthis with some airstrikes?
The problem with the Taliban as well as what happened in Vietnam is how things were ran from the top. We were too indecisive and too lax. We may have the technological edge, but we have idiots running the show.
@@SkrixFox The real problem with Afghanistan, as we'd been telling the Muricans, was that Pakistan played USA like a fiddle. Gave shelter to Quetta Shura (it is in the damn name FFS!) while embezzling weapons from USA by holding their GLOCs hostage. You cannot defeat an active insurgency without destroying it at its root/source. The same problem we've been having in Kashmir, only that we've gotten so good at stemming infiltration and local radicalization that the insurgency has reduced from a raging inferno to a smouldering ember.
Was also not a good idea to have your own puppet blatantly running the government in Afghanistan, sidelining the likes of Saleh and instead of leveraging the ethnic divide and building a Tajik-Hazara-Uzbek alliance to rule over the Pashtuns. Also, instead of leveraging the Soviet-trained manpower, using fresh recruits for the ANA. So many issues.
Frankly, Soviets did a MUCH better job in Afghanistan. Their Afghanistan regime outlasted USSR itself XD. Makes USA look like a total noob.
yea but who would you rather be your countries benefactor, america, or russia ? given a choice for quality of benefits and nothing else (even though America is very tolerant of different ideologies)
@@SkrixFox You have never read a history book have you. "More decisiveness at the top" what a transparent propaganda for a new strongman to lead us! If only we had more top down leadership we would have won Vietnam! what an absolute parody.
@@death_parade Who is we? Who could be influencing American Politics and pushing for conflict with Pakistan and Iran??
I find it funny imagining the Houthis watching this video like “WRITE THAT DOWN WRITE DOWN aww man he ain’t saying anything else”
😅😅I am Houthi
@@user-vf2uy3nf5ime too 😂😂😂
2nd time a ship was abandoned, the first time they re-boarded the ship once international authorities were on scene to help with firefighting.
Aden isn't controlled by the Houthis. They were attacking a ship with food for their civil war opponents.
are you fing dumb ?
مساعدة لي اسرئيل انت عندك خلل في ادمغ
Basic analysis errors but he is out of his lane so what do you expect.
The Japanese "Long Lance" torpedo had an effective range of 24,000 yards, with a speed of 48-50 knots and a maximum range of 44,200 yards at 34 to 36 knots.
long lance was gyro only - no ability to turn
@@johnjennings9043Yes, Mr Clown, but 80 years ago....
the arctic passage is going to accelerate, its like a replay of the past when europe was forced to find alternative routes to reach india and china
Russia may have opinions on that? delusional western politicians 'forgot' that one
Russia may not like that in their backyard.
@@Aamirmhmd99 They can cry about it; and the majority of the NW Passage is through Canada.
On the contrary !! They'll make pay to ensure a safe transit in their waters ! @@Aamirmhmd99
@dalel3608 I think you missed the point... read "might not like it" as "might also fire at ships".
They won't need to "cry about it" if they decide to take covert action and claim ignorance.
Peace through strength; war through weakness
Hey Aaron and team. Thank you for the constant quality content! You guys are doing an awesome job.
Thanks Aaron
Thanks Jive!
I Always look forward to your insight and to that matter You tend to talk about things I wonder about. Thank you for Your work.
Great video, Aaron...👍
Thank you Sir.
Hey Sub brief would you be able to cover the Australian Navy plan announcement? It involves new Hunter class frigates to replace the Anzac class plus unmanned ships? Would like to know more.
Hi Aaron! Any chance on some coverage regarding the Royal Navies failed Trident test fires? @sub brief
This channel is amazing
Thats Super Cool Dudes
titanic 2 could be a civilian passenger holiday submarine
that would avoid icy waters
I saw that movie. It really went out with a bang!
I have not seen one of your updates on the disposition of the Navy around the world. Do we still have a carrier group in the eastern Mediterranean?
Given that there have been near misses (implying at least _some_ unguided weapons), it seems like frequent minor changes to course and speed may be in order in this area?
Hey do a piece on the Australian Navy fleet review released today. Ta
I love channel. Can you provide proof that Saviz is reporting ship movements, or is your source anonymous? Thanks!
Looks like Iran is getting some cheap testing for their arsenal!
They got it pushed all the way in last time they challenged us with gunboats, skiffs, and oil platforms. The survivors are still rusting in dockyards, unrepaired.
@@Einwetok And this time, they're using a bunch of fishermen to backdoor you with unmanned underwater vehicles and ASBMs while you cuckle your knobs...how'd it come to that, lawl?
Can details of these conventional "Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile". I haven't seen much on that.
No, they are not just attacking any ship. Only those belonging to countries that are complicit in the genocide. Also, if the US can supply weapons to Ukraine, Israel, why can't other country or Iran help their friends? The same rules apply to everyone. Take it or leave it.
They kind of are attacking any ship. They don't keep to the terms of their propaganda.
Also, the US aiding Ukraine's defense is not quite the same as Iran aiding terrorist organizations sowing international chaos.
Hey Sub Brief, why no video on the Chinese sub that sank last summer?
For the rhythm 🎶 🙌 😍
I'll be interested to hear your take on the latest announcement about the Royal Australian Navy- cutting the latest high end frigate, the Hunter Class from 9 to 6, Adding 11 "Tier 2" frigates of unknown make, 6 "optionally manner" surface warships...
News to me. But expected given that Hunter class design was facing issues of trying to fit too much on too smol a ship and ending up with low propulsive power for such high displacement vessel.
@@death_parade Hunters aren't small. They're destroyers by any other metric.
@@peterides9568 You misunderstand. I mean the amount of hardware Aus is trying to fit on a ship this size is too much. They should have started with a bigger vessel. But they didn't, then stretched this vessel in design phase and now have the problem of low propulsive power. At least that is what I read about it a couple years ago.
On the torpedos, I wonder whether certain 3 letter agencies could take control of them and steer them into the Iranian targeting ship? Now that would be funny.
Opps
@@stevensutton2252 That is brutally genius...
intranet, not internet lol
On the 17th the Central Command "X" (formerly Twitter) feed announced they intercepted an attack by an unmanned underwater vessel (UUV) launched by the Houthie controlled area. This was a first according the the tweet.
1. First of all isn't an UUV just another name for a torpedo? if not, what is the difference?
2. What system(s) does the US Navy use to counter UUV? Can you intercept a torpedo with a torpedo.
Any insight you have on this incident which got very little media attention would be appreciated.
Also Sub brief. Do you think atlering course and speed would be of any use against these weapons? Especially when they are in radar range of that spy ship?
These commercial ships are not maneuverable and are like trains; they take a long time to slow down/speed up
These commercial ships are not very maneuverable. They're about as maneuverable as freight trains. It takes miles for these ships to speed up, slow down, or turn. It's not a spontaneous thing at all. Torpedo attacks are rather spontaneous and shocking affairs.
Do you know how we found and destroyed the underwater drone?
Aaron, when you report that Houthi's are firing "ballistic missiles" at these cargo ships, are we literally talking about dumb old, fire-and-forget missiles? If so as you say then perhaps the cargo ships should change their protocol to regularly (or irregularly) adjust their velocity. Would that help to let the missiles just dump harmlessly into the water?
Most merchant vessels are not very maneuverable and can't accelerate fast enough to make unpredictable course changes.
They are some kind of guided missiles/drones which are most likely getting updated gps coordinates from the Iranian ship in the gulf which is why they are getting a lot of near misses (splashing in view of the ship crews)
You must stop confusing reality with games. Merchant ships cannot accelerate or change their speed Only warships can do this
Is that ship anchor in territorial waters or international?
It looks like the Rubymar sank.
How are these intel ships getting the info, civilian radar, visual?
Yemen is divided in 3. Which faction was this ship supplying?
Btw, these are the same kind of subs that are used for smuggeling drugs and weapons.
That's probably a better use for subs than boomers...
@@blogintonblakley2708 You do know that a boomer is a nuclear armed submarine of the Ohio-clas or the Typhoon-class (or similar sized subs), right?
@@thomas_jay Yup... my point.
Where did Houthis get the ballistic/cruise missiles and the submersible UAVs? Iran. Where did Iran get these modern weapon technologies under international sanctions? China. So you see where the root cause is.
Root cause is the US
From the US Iran Contra deal
This stuff became commonplace tech back in 2010-2015, I know someone local who got their doctorate in Marine Studies designing them. Basically, it's just an RC torpedo with a long range radio.
@@ClayinSWVA anything radio-controlled is susceptible to jamming. Could be worse, they could be using something actually as advanced as 1960s acoustic homing torpedo technology. Really, this is 1940s-1950s tech in a lot of ways. I'm sure the radios are more advanced than 1950s radios, but their guidance and sensor technology is absolutely backwards ancient stuff.
why would china go into sanctions helping iran? lol
What's the difference between a torpedo and a "one-way UUV"?
That "one way UUVs" have no meaningful automation or target detection sensors. Kind of like how "one way attack UAVs" are just really slow, shitty missiles with a man-in-the-loop guidance system
Nothing...
Hey Aaron, can you expand on why Iran wants to disrupt shipping in the red sea? I am not sure what reason they have for doing so other than drawing sanctions.
So, one's a slow torpedo, the other is a remote controlled boat.
Did anyone need to make up an acronym for that?
USV and UUV
How could we know what something is without an acronym attached?
My gods man. Written language was only invented in order to make acronyms possible.
This is like shooting at your uber eats guy while your family starves. Because your neighbor called the cops on you for a noise complaint.
I'm sure Iran is sending the Houthis food along with the weapons they provide. It isn't the terrorists who are dying, it's the civilian population that hasn't been converted into an arm of the Iranian regime
Ain't no way it's true, sounds like US propaganda
Aden is actually controlled by the STC (Southern Transitional Council) which is another faction in the Yemeni civil war.
Get informed propperly before you talk.
@@Max-of2nc Grain probably flows from south to north and vice versa within Yemen, thus affecting the price and avaliability of food throughout the country, not just in the south. Don't shoot the hand that feeds you just because it feeds your enemies also.
@@hasselnttper3730 you havent been in a country at war???? Of course it doesnt.
Huties attack only Isresli support shipping 😮
Houthi I've just become a naval power overnight, 20%, of naval merchant ships I've been rerouted around the horn of Africa
Wouldn't it be ironic of one of those Iranian, 'non-military spy ships' had a catastrophic hull failure - - oh - say from a magnetic limpet munition - placed there by a dive team or submersible?? The cause of the sinking would of course be "Sudden Hull Failure Syndrome" and the acutal 'cause of the breech' would never be discovered"...
We could blame Climate Change!
That Iranian ship is also armed with anti-ship missiles, cruise missiles and torpedoes as well as air defense weapons. America only shoots are targets that can't shoot back.
@@whonextinhiphopActually, we only shoot at targets that shoot at us.
You're confused by the fact that they can't shoot back when we're done.
@@whonextinhiphop Do you have even a shred of PROOF of that rather ridiculous statement?? It's a container carrier - NO obvious "air defense weapons" and it's being labelled as 'civilian'. If it had ANY such weapons on it - it would be on the bottom by now. I call "bull$shit" on your statement.
@@CptJistuce iran wins with hypersonic speed lol
✌️
Any thoughts on red sea becoming unpassable and russias efforts to promote the arctic asia/europe passage. Sounds wild huh?
eventually *Someone* has to put boots on the ground in Yemen. The question is 1) Who and 2) What RoE?
@@tehpw7574Let the Israelis do it. We can worry about our own border.
@@jakemocci3953We've got enough boots to do both, and the shipping issues greatly affect the availability and cost of goods here.
It looks like the little black nose on the torpedoes is going to be part of a passive acoustic sensor. It listens for propeller noises for homing/tracking, and so it's not suitable for attacking harbors. It goes to the noisiest example of its tuned match/model by FFT, so it can be done on an arduino, instead of a billion dollar navy sonar (epic ripoff). It also can't tell one ship from another, because it's just looking for "Yup. That's a propeller of a large commercial vessel."... Still technically better than a billion dollar navy sonar system, because an arduino costs $40 and a billion dollars of these hootie torps can remove every ship within range of its launch, due to consumables exhaustion.
Of course, I made all that stuff up, but show me something in this bizarre scenario that isn't. Hooties have no chip fabs. They have no torpedo factories. A few weeks ago, they were launching bottle rockets, and now they have smooth, shiny, waxed torps on display that outperform humans that had this same job in WWII. I would love to say "I'm not buying it", but I guarantee I have, without my consent.
Guess who isnt getting anymore pizzas delivered or other food into ports... in this case
I will wait to see what happens when they mine the straits , sea mines have been very effective historically , coupled with the ASM and BM and drones they should be able to deter passage at a higher level. Not sure the air strikes are having any real positive effect in the sense that so many have just decided to go around and avoid the fighting. In that sense, it's an effective blockade.
The Saudis have had very little luck over the past 10 years, and they were using modern planes/munitions with our ISR. Evidently, the Houthis are rather decentralized.
Then Iran would achieve their goal of getting Yeman invaded
@@jakemocci3953 This the Saudis and the UAE were unable to defeat the houthis. The U.S military in Saudis Arabia was also providing all the satellite imagery, Intel etc. So it's not like they went at it on their own. Maersk will no longer be using the route until the situation changes and Lloyd's of London will not be insuring ship's that use the route. The strikes have done nothing to deter that.
Drone not a sub.
I don't know about the legality of the matter but if those ships are participating in militant action against international shipping (which we are confident is the case) those ships should at the very least be boarded and searched, and if anything is found or if the crew fight back, seized.
I'm not sure why we haven't. Those ships aren't in transit, they are essentially committing or enabling piracy, and since Iran denied any involvement they can either prove it with an inspection or force them to take a stand. Even China is getting annoyed by these attacks.
@Sub Brief The Royal Navy released last week that HMS Diamond is going to the nearest port so it can resupply it weapons and food once resupplied it will head back to the Red Sea and is being replaced by HMS Richmond while HMS Diamond is being resupplied
Hey Aaron perhaps you should take a look at the MILAN 2024 exercises taking place in India right now, we have over 50 participent countries and warships from Russia, Iran and Usa in the same port!
Wait what? Why would supposed enemies be working together?
Its a big club. And you aint in it.
@@MelaninMagdalene India invites everyone, and anyone that wants India to be their friend says Yes
@@dalel3608 Not everyone. I'm sure India won't invite China or Pakistan
@@dalel3608 is it a byot? like bring your own toilet deal?
Iran and the Houtis are working together with the Houtis doing real time testing of all iranian weapons.
Hello did you see this British nuclear missile 'misfires and crashes into ocean' Trident nuclear missile misfired and crashed into the ocean near the submarine that launched it during a test last month, it has been reported. Whats up with this? reprtef by The Telegraph
For your information they also have 2 foot boat drone with solar using rpg on it and using gps. China produce it on thousand.
Houthis expert build strong antiship weapons and spy-drones program.
Taking a military advantage from a weak and indecisive foe is straight out of Sun Tzu
Sun Tzu's book is warfare 101.
Alhamdulillah. Alhamdulillah. Alhamdulillah. Go home!!!
For god sakes. Do not touch our BOATS!!!!
They are learning from Ukraine in the Black Sea, America giving target info there for Ukraine drone ships. Here Iran helping Yemen.
I wonder if they were trying to hit their own food supply ship, just to point the finger at the west.
It wasn't their food supply shipment. Everyone keeps talking about the civil war in Yemen and not thinking about it. Guess who does not control the port where the food was heading?
I noticed a sale this weekend at Bass Pro Shops on fishing boats and yes----Genaral YA YA was there undercover wearing a Hawaiian shirt but that high-pitched voice gave him away!
Why is the factory or factories in Iran not bombed?
Embarrassing. Remember when the USA wouldn't tolerate crap like this?
Praying Mantis sailing club remembers.
You mean back when USA had the leeway to put boots on the ground everywhere because there was no real competitor in the near peer category?
Eiron not I RAN.
Can someone explain to me why Nato article 5 is not activated and Yemen invaded by the whole NATO?
So much for ordering Uber Eats or Door Dash in Yemen.......Huthis=not so smart
You would think there would be a way to interdict the flows of arms, people and money from Iran to Yemen. Isn’t Saudi Arabia gonna help us with this?
Pretty clear he doesn't run. Not sure why he ran with that
What happened
They don't attack PRC ships.
Biting the hand that feeds, pretty spot on for these extreme religionists. "God Almighty give us the power to destroy our own food, Praise Allah we are the chosen!"
Don't forget that you're talking about countries with an average IQ in the low 60s. Sadly, I am not kidding.
@@feoxorus "Average national IQ" is a garbage metric. Especially given how it is computed. This radicalization does take a toll on the rationality of an individual though, so you're not exactly wrong.
This is a very strange ship. It is actually owned by a US company, which was Greek flagged (and partly Grek crewed), carrying Argentinian corn to Bulgaria. What I'd like to know is why the Captain of the ship decided to sail two thirds around the world (around Cape Horn, across the entire Pacific and Indian Oceans and then up through Suez into the Mediterranean) to Bulgaria! If the corn came from Argentina why not simply sail across the Atlantic, past Gibraltar through the Med to Bulgaria and miss the whole Houthis in the Red Sea?! Am I missing something?
Now we know who is providing intel to the Houthis but has the actual intel been intercepted? And if so, that proof might justify action.
Missing the last little funny comments that you would include at the end of the videos
The iranian "civilian" ship that says it is "civilian" but giving military data, doesnt that breach the Geneva Conventions of using civilian as shields or what it is called? I mean, looking on the Gaza and Isreal, I know it is a far cut but it is related to what is happening in the Red Sea. The Israeli Intel Core had reported that Hamas (Or the others) had been using buildings like schools, religious buildings and so on as storage or firing points for their rockets. Which under the Geneva Conventions does state as a civilian and there by not allowed to be attacked under the law of War. It also stated that if any military uses or goes into one such building, it nullify the "protective statues".
With that, if they suspect that Saviz is spying and helping Houthis with data as military, then the navies in the area should be cleared to board or stop it to check or force it away. Their claimed protective statues as civilian is then nullified by the Geneva Conventions and should be a fair game as a military target
Yes if it's used for miltiary purposes then it's a military target. However the question is do you want to go to war. Similarly NATO resources are undoubtably passing targetting data to Ukraine, attacking the Iranian ones would give Russia a precedent which they're great at twisting to their advantage (most of their invasions in the last 2 decades have used the precedent of Kosovo/Libya).
@@tomriley5790 Well, I mean, it is worth to raid the ship. But again, if it is a breach of the law, then US could just gather data and try to pull it through Haag. But I also know the history had told us during the Cold War that both US and USSR had supported each of their geopolitical poxy wars. I know that Iran is more or less doing the same thing here as well.
Either way, I just feel all this is storms for a much larger and wider hurricane on a global scale. It isnt a question about if we ending into a new world war. Now it just seems more and more like it is a question about when
Geneva Convention. Seriously? Who actually follows it anymore? Who ever really followed its predecessor before WW2? Obeying the "rules" doesn't win wars.
@@tomriley5790Russia doesn't need or care about precedents That's a Western concept because we're overrun by lawyers.
Russia may use precedents to boost their public justifications, but it has no factor in their decision making.
@@tomriley5790 Seems a silly question to ask when the Houthis and Iranians are already behaving as though they are at war. Not sure how they have managed to spin the propaganda so much that literally deliberately shooting at unarmed, nonthreatening, neutral merchants is more or less normalized in some peoples' minds. I thought we lived in a world in which a live-fire shot aimed at a noncombatant was in itself an act of war. As such, the Houthis have effectively unilaterally declared war against a wide range of countries, and I don't see why they shouldn't be treated as such.
Russia, and China, and Iran, and several other such states have demonstrated with increasing regularity that, though they will pay lip service to "precedent," they don't really care beyond whether they think they can get away with something, in a very stripped-down practical sense. My overarching question here is why we the collective rest of the world have largely allowed them to get away with it without effective deterring consequence, and why so many nations continue to treat them as more or less good faith actors despite such overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
All that is old is new again
Hahaha, the Houties. As if they could do anything of this by themselves. Just another proxy terror with somebody else in the background...
It's not 'aai-ran' it is 'eeran'.
👀
Houttis are not idiots. They also see how Ukrainian forces have sunk russian warship with marine drones. It's not very complicated if Iran give them stuff for that and it will be more difficult to defend commercial ships
Evidently the Houthis don't care about the environmental catastrophe that might happen to their coastline if they were to hit something with toxic cargo. I'm sure their fishermen will have mixed feelings about losing their livelihood, and about the chance of starvation. Watch them cry for aid when they cause their own problems.
I am being respectful i follow all protocols on youtube youtube should explain to the masses who is the cause of this chaos if they don't want others to speculate the cause of the destruction of ship on the red sea, (i keep getting all these warning from youtube before i post any comments )
Unfortunately the Houthis attacking a Food delivery to Yemen makes a cynical and brutal Sense
the point beeing that food shortages create instability that in turn benefits a rebel force like the Houthis
and rest asure that neither their leaders nor fighters will suffer hunger
Country A providing actional data and weapons to country B to attack country C? What is a reasonable repercussion for country A by country C?
The same logic could be applied to us in the Ukraine.
@@jakemocci3953 US in the Ukraine is providing actionable data and weapons to defend Ukraine from an invasion. That's a bit different, though the eventual view of the morality is often decided by who wins.
To be analogous, the US would have to be aiding Russia.
soooooo if the Ukrainians can use various sea born drones, why not the Houthis???
Houthis does not retreat from a stand .. Americans used to the attitude of Arab governments which turns to 🐀's just for a word
What if the Houties get Sea drones like the ones the NATO gave to Ukraine ?
I am certain the Cargo ship insurers will not allow these ships to go into the Red Sea !
Jjunk youtuber acting like a vip🤠
Thanks for the updates. Looks like the situation is getting worse. We look forward to rising inflation and more world instability.
👍
Is there any difference in the Irainians supplying houthi intel - and the US sending Spy drones into the black sea? Answer - No.
Nobody is mentioning the crew of the ship were actually escorted off of the ship by Houthis to a smaller vessel so as to ensure their safety.
no more free oil for u I guess?
Do Chinese goods go through the Red Sea to Europe? Does this mean they have a stake in this which happens to go along NATO's?
Yes, and the Chinese PM recently also accused Iran about that. Apparently they also send a flotilla to the region but I am not very sure about said information.
You mentioned that the Houthis are having a food crisis because of the conflict they are in but you conveniently didn’t say that Saudi Arabia, a US ally is enforcing an embargo alongside sanctions on the Houthis. That is more material reasons for the food crisis. This is my first time watching your channel and it sounds like a propaganda channel due to the idealistic way you frame your words.