How Good Are Sherwood Archers in Medieval 2: Total War?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 13 янв 2025

Комментарии • 29

  • @Pink.andahalf
    @Pink.andahalf 19 дней назад +16

    I've played Short and Long Campaigns as England and never saw these guys. Looked it up online, I could swear I had a Woodsmans Guild. Guess I never upgraded it.

    • @maxcarroll8639
      @maxcarroll8639 19 дней назад +3

      Yeah, I remember being able to get a few to the new world, but they're astonishingly rare

    • @qualityoldgames7721
      @qualityoldgames7721  18 дней назад +1

      Thanks for the comment. Yea, the requirements for these guys are quite high :)

  • @napoleoncomplex2712
    @napoleoncomplex2712 18 дней назад +7

    These guys are ranged special forces. They can do fantastic fighting against other archers or sniping down dangerous but small-sized enemy cavalry units on approach, but they're also capable of defending themselves at choke points, on rocky ground, or in forests where the cavalry charge is either impossible or less effective. Other things they're good at is quickly scrambling up ladders to seize gates, giving spearmen who manage to close the distance a horrifying surprise in melee, using their small and nimble unit size to provide close support during melees, charging in from the flanks once out of arrows using their enormous attack stat, and defending walls.
    Just don't let them get hit by a cavalry charge out in the open, because even light cavalry will melt them.
    I think the score is fair though. What's the use of an elite unit if it's so elusive no one can get hold of it? They're basically the medieval A-team.

    • @Gitsmasher
      @Gitsmasher 18 дней назад +2

      Got any tips to trigger woodman guild? Seems random tp me😢

    • @napoleoncomplex2712
      @napoleoncomplex2712 18 дней назад +1

      @@Gitsmasher I'm mainly familiar with them from the Britannia Kingdoms campaign. They're much easier to get hold of as mercenaries there. I think they're also different statistically, but they still serve the same battlefield role.

    • @qualityoldgames7721
      @qualityoldgames7721  18 дней назад +1

      :D Yea, it seems they are a bit too elusive for their own good. Thanks for the comment.

    • @qualityoldgames7721
      @qualityoldgames7721  18 дней назад +2

      @@Gitsmasher Thanks for the comment. Imo you just need to spam archers - the better the better. You also need to have Fortress - and Citadel for the upgraded ones (from where you can recruit these). Chivalrous ruler (5+ chivalry) also helps. :)

  • @BenHyle
    @BenHyle 18 дней назад +4

    I've used groups of them hiding in woods to ambush other units on the campaign map and battlefield to really good effect before. They're super niche, and they're very fun to use. However, you get them so late in the campaign, they're very limited in recruitment, and you have to manually resolve all the battles they're in, which in the late game can be a bit frustrating.
    So, fair.

    • @qualityoldgames7721
      @qualityoldgames7721  18 дней назад

      Thanks for the comment. Yea, sounds like a nice tactics. Perhaps, if they could deploy the stakes, they would be significantly better :)

  • @cristhianferreyra1563
    @cristhianferreyra1563 15 дней назад +2

    I usually used those guys as snipers against general bodyguard or some specific units like elephants or something like. 🤔

    • @qualityoldgames7721
      @qualityoldgames7721  15 дней назад

      Sounds like a reasonable tactics. Thanks for the comment :)

  • @Nighthawk9101
    @Nighthawk9101 18 дней назад +3

    I had these in a campaign and they were great. Just make Nottingham where you build your archers (no peasant archers allowed), and it'll come soon enough

    • @qualityoldgames7721
      @qualityoldgames7721  18 дней назад +1

      Thanks for the comment. Yea, Nottingham might the best place to go for these guys :)

  • @gustavchambert7072
    @gustavchambert7072 19 дней назад +2

    Hit points are a really strong defense against high damage missiles, and that combined with the very high missile damage with AP and the high RoF of bowmen relative to crossbows makes that result a pretty safe bet.
    In general though, this unit definitely makes me feel like "time to victory" or "micro intensity", or both, needs to be a factor in this series. Sure, that will advantage sinple to use units, but a unit that is effective at something without requiring insane levels of micro management and which achieves results in a reasonable timeframe is arguably more powerful than a unit that requires fifteen minutes of intense micro to do that same thing slightly better.

    • @qualityoldgames7721
      @qualityoldgames7721  18 дней назад

      Thanks for the comment. Yea, most definitely archers and horse archers suffer from rather loooooooooooooonnnggg battles in the tests :)

  • @Duke_of_Lorraine
    @Duke_of_Lorraine 11 дней назад +1

    The small unit size (less missile volume than regular lbows) and very limited recruitment conditions (making it a pain to regenerate as you'd need planning a full supply route only to reinforce them) makes them not worth it.

    • @qualityoldgames7721
      @qualityoldgames7721  11 дней назад

      Thanks for the comment. Well summarized :)

    • @Duke_of_Lorraine
      @Duke_of_Lorraine 11 дней назад +1

      @qualityoldgames7721 oh, on top of that they are limited to 3 units max ? That makes them even worse, as for any practical use they would be limited to defending the British Isles.
      If by the time you have a citadel there you still need significant forces to defend the area, you're doing something wrong.

    • @qualityoldgames7721
      @qualityoldgames7721  11 дней назад

      @@Duke_of_Lorraine Oh, didn't know about that max 3 units... Yea, makes the unit quite a bit worse then :) Thanks for the comment.

    • @Duke_of_Lorraine
      @Duke_of_Lorraine 11 дней назад

      @@qualityoldgames7721 I thought that was what you meant by the unit limit in your video. Is it instead the number until the unit becomes red (more expensive) in custom battles ?

  • @Gitsmasher
    @Gitsmasher 18 дней назад +1

    I use these guys the way i play as High elves in Warhammer 3😂,

    • @qualityoldgames7721
      @qualityoldgames7721  18 дней назад +1

      Sounds nice :) Thanks for the comment.

    • @Gitsmasher
      @Gitsmasher 17 дней назад

      @qualityoldgames7721 you are b! Well i hope you christmas was very Merry👍

  • @Eintracht-uy3cz
    @Eintracht-uy3cz 18 дней назад +2

    pretty good guys, but their unit size is just so small.

    • @Gitsmasher
      @Gitsmasher 18 дней назад +1

      Well , i like it. Absurd stats, firepower, stealth (can hide anywhere) yet low unit counts is probably the game telling us " Oy , dont waste their arrows killing medicore units. Go try sniping General Bodyguard or sumfink " 😅

    • @qualityoldgames7721
      @qualityoldgames7721  18 дней назад

      Agreed and the requirements are rather high :) Thanks for the comment.

  • @jekrolandmalangenmalangen6398
    @jekrolandmalangenmalangen6398 19 дней назад +1

    Id still say this unit is englands best Archer unit in game despite its specific requirements to get them

    • @qualityoldgames7721
      @qualityoldgames7721  18 дней назад +2

      Thanks for the comment. Imo their lack of wooden stakes is a bit of an issue. That makes the Retinue Longbows more versatile imo :)