Why didn’t they say anything before that? Like I understand in videos like this a lot is left out but it seems like they just did that without any warning only then saying their reasons on why he did what it did was it being a fake. Would have been a bit funny if the art director went “yeah I know it’s not the original it’s copy made for display purposes that cost a lot of money”
Yeah, that's been one of the group of geniuses' issues. To them, once it's logical, it is permissible, without care as to the feelings of anyone else. High IQ, low EQ
The show is called scorpions the entire team is a bunch of Geniuses that have social issues if I remember correctly all of them have around 180 IQ they would look at what they did as nothing wrong because I don't see that there was a better way to expose that the painting was fake and it doesn't matter if someone tries to teach them to say something first and let them test the painting they would still not understand
@@hippiemama52 Could’ve been just as dramatic with the same tearing pay off at the end. It’d be the exact same story just with the scenes reversed (obv lol). Long story short, it wouldn’t have changed anything but how pleasing it was to the original commenter.
Fun fact, museums tend to not display the original priceless pieces if possible and if not they'll a protective film over the paintings to protect them from vandalism like this.
@xanderx51 Quiet Xander! You know TV shows and movies have to be 100% accurate! They should have taken it into a sterile room and examined it in Tyvek suits with microscopes! Then they should have shown the entire fulfillment of paperwork required for the insurance claim.
This museum was actually scamming. The guy who freaked out had no idea but the director was buying shitty artworks. This group had suspected it (I’m not sure if you know but the show is about it a few geniuses who solve lots of money loitering crimes and other crimes) they visited the museum and this painting stood out to them as an immediate fake with no worth
I agree with you as long as the buyer knows that it is a reproduction. I buy prints. I don't have the money for originals. And don't consider the art that I have as an investment.
1. this was the first painting of the artist, before he settled into the style we "know and love" 2. it was before he was rich and famous, so he had different brushes; cheap ones 3. the painting was reframed 50 years later (I'm just making shit up; but it counters their "findings")
Just like fake money isnt worth anything, the same goes for a painting. Museums and collectors deal in authenticity. Its worth jack shit and it means the museum was defrauded.
Fun fact: my old teacher used to copy famous paintings so that his boss could sell them to American companies. So he was doing illegal stuff without knowing it.😊
Not actually illegal for certain paintings. For example, the Mona Lisa is in the public domain, which means anyone can copy it. Sometimes it's even set as a challenge for art classes. So long as you advertise them as copies and don't try to claim they're the original it is completely legal to create and sell copies of certain famous paintings.
I dunno how that is but I can definitely order a replica painting made to be the exact same size as the original (which was painted by a guy with a weird moustache) and have his signature on it for around 200$
The brush stroke count is obviously ridiculous. The "oh, the fan subconsciously knows something is off" is stupid Nails haven't changed almost at all since the industrial revolution and they also get replaced during restoration work all the time so that one is just demonstrably nonsense even if there was a date stamped on the head of the nail. Yeah, they really should subvert this stuff a bit. Hell even if they were right on the money, they can't actually prove anything they said.
@@NeoHellPoetI don't know what show this is and I've never seen this before but I got the impression They were covering for him. So everything you're pointing out is just like Sheldon from Big bang theory not getting sarcasm for double meanings
My mom has this old oil painting,I've seen copies selling for $1800.but hers doesn't have the guy that makes the copy's signature under the original, like they have.i told her I think she has the original,I messaged a museum and they said that it's highly unlikely that I have the original, it's been lost for years and I haven't asked anyone else since.think I'm gonna take it to a college or museum for appraisal
@@NeoHellPoet funny enough, they were right. It was a fake. I saw the episode. And the guy counting the brushstrokes is actually legit, in this series (it's called Scorpion btw) he is one of, if not the smartest person in the world. It's a team made up of geniuses in different fields. But the video barely gives any context so it is of course extremely confusing.
Also the painting generally comes before the frame. A painting’s frame is the equivalent to an after-market part. Like, would putting new seats in your car prove that it’s a fake car?
@@IsatuIceBangura They often don't use original nails because those don't really exist anymore. They use the next best thing and there was a time when they really didn't care and would even cut the original painting to fit a new frame
Theres alot of ways to tell a real painting from a fake. Counting brush strokes isnt one of them, i just know how painful is had to have been for that actor to say something soo stupid
The context is that he and the others are geniuses and that one absolutely would know and have counted the brushstrokes to find a difference. They aren’t art appraisers.
@@MaliqueGowley irl, maybe but I know someone that counts objects in a painting that should be there. (One was clouds) This is a show with characters that would. He’s ocd so he counts everything. Your point is moot.
@@DanWi90 You are not wrong. I just wanted to point out that the painting were analysed from 5-8m far and one dude counted the brushstrokes another said the nails were not produced at the time... while standind even further. So the point is, this is a tv show with highly fictional methods. No need to point out the nail problem, when an other dude simple counted the brush strokes 5 meters from the painting.
@@clethcriss6258it's something that, if you could do it, would make sense. The issue there is that it's impossible but the premise of the show says this guy can do it, so that's fine. The fact that you can't turn a DeLorian into a time machine doesn't hurt the quality of Back to the Future. The nails getting replaced is a problem the premise doesn't solve. Even if the exact date was stamped on the head of the nail, it still doesn't work. That would be the equivalent of Marty going back to the Revolutionary War instead of the 1950's but the finally is still set in a High School dance. It's an inaccuracy not covered by the premise. It's the difference between something being real and something being realistic. You can add stuff to a show or movie that's not real. That's the definition of fiction, but if you write something that doesn't make sense even in the context of the book, show or movie, that's un realistic and a sign of bad, lazy or sloppy writing
Not everyone in the comment section hating on the scene and forgetting that the museum was scamming people with painting and these guys were trying to prove that the paintings are fake 😂😂😂😂
as an artist i think he could just argue the case? destroying it is over the top. rembrandt had students, Andy Warhol had his factory, sometimes the artist is having a bad day. this is typical hollywood simplification. they do not know a damn thing? if you are a real plumber, and watch tv , you scream about bad plumbers on tv. and if you are a dentist , you scream about tv dentists. Hollywood always does a half arsed job. of real workmen.
@@markuhler2664 a law for media accuracy? are you insane, they lie about everything. I have seen it first hand. I worked in a auction house, they were selling a painting, valued at £100,000 , it was in the front window, and old lady passed by, saw the painting, recognized it as a painting stolen from her neighbour. She contacted the police. they came around , took the painting, arrested the thief, and the newspaper reported that a sharp eyed copper, saw the painting in the window, so the police got a BOOST, they get credit. The old lady might not have wanted any credit? The news papers lie about everything. I would not read one, ever. its BS. and tabloids are really beyond the pale. I saw thievery every week. Its covered up even by respectable men,. men of high rank. Its a big Joke. they have patsies that take the blame, if they can't buy off the parties. The auction houses are rife with corruption. today you see an investigation with the British Museum. lots stolen from them. Its a vast joke. and you quote a law of media accuracy? as if that meant a thing? i love the way that college kids, and university people TONE DOWN larceny. WIth theories and laws. They quote a law, to cover a massacre. or a theft of billions. to make it sound academic. while the little man serves out 25 years in a jail. and the rich man gets out in six months. with lawyers.
As a "genius" person with an iq pretty similar to those claimed in this show I believe they did a fairly accurate job of what an actual "genius" would do in this situation. Had they brought it to the attention of the curator he would have denied it and never investigated it because that could potentially cost him millions of dollars plus the bad press and reputation. I use the word "genius" like this because highly intelligent people don't think like the normal person. It's not that they are smarter because we are not, it's that we think about things in a different and more efficient way than the average person that makes us do better on an iq test. I never claim to be smarter than the next person even though my iq has been tested to be around 150 putting me right around the top .1% of the population because honestly im stupid to a lot of subjects but if I know about something more than the next person I would so do something as shocking to prove the point. They actually did a very good job with the show even though its exaggerated.
@@That_big_guy So as a genius, what have you done with your super ego? Got a cure for cancer? or solved a few math problems. what have you done to help mankind. i keep hearing people tell me about their intellect. and all they are doing is messing about on YT with all the rest of humanity. An IQ test is geared towards puzzles. if you have never had to rotate shapes? done crossword puzzles, played chess. then you don't understand what you are doing? Same as if i pass a tool to a physics professor. Here professor , fix the electric socket. The professor pays a man to do that. I know many a genius, who cannot change a light bulb. who are lost when it comes to simple tasks. Who cannot speak to a girl. Intelligence is a trick. if you spend all day doing IQ tests for a month, then take it, you get a high score, as you know what sort of things appear. its like chess puzzles, you know its not the simple choice. an expert is someone that does the task day in, day out. Knows his business. specialist.
This show tended to go to the dramatic gestures more and more as it went on. Sometimes they produced these big genius solutions when there was a simpler one available. I enjoyed the show overall, but mostly in the early episodes.
Yes but also lots fakes mona Lisa too do they one guy bought a fake one at action one time and they almost use all same examples as this movie did do😅😬
I agree with you on that. My grandfather was a painter and did as much as 5 of some of his paintings, the "master" and copies with some tiny variations. Also a painting can be removed from its original frame at some point and then later reframed (did it with him on old paintings), so the nails argument is nill also.
Ah, I know the redhaired guy. He is a day player who has appeared in thousands of tv shows by now. He was a buddy of mine in Los Angeles back in the days when I was an aspiring actor there... Great guy. Never became a start. Became an eternal day player.
It's a movie, make believe what people pretending to be somebody they are not. The manufactured Nails in the frame is only circumstantial and not a Surefire guarantee about the paintings authenticity😅
Not to mention. Nails would have been replaced many times by now anyway. People restore and replace that kind of stuff on old paintings for a living. It's also on a public floor, so it's obviously a replica. No museum actually publically showcases the original.
This entire show is like this. You have a bunch of geniuses with poor interpersonal skills who are able to bond with this normal lady who can translate the world to them.
I love how ppl are all irritated about the value of a painting even if it's a fake 😂😂😂 it's a show so it's a prop it's value is probably 20 bucks calling the actor a jerk for doing it 😂😂 y'all make me laugh
In rainman the guy counted toothpicks spilled on the floor with just a glance from an almost full box in seconds. These savants do exist. I can tell you how much money will disappear from my wallet every day without even looking. 😂😂😂
@@Altmetalpunk it would be impossible. Some of them would be the same brushstroke, but you’re mistaken. Others could be something other than a brushstroke.
Hey guys, just wanted to know if yall heard the part about him not having EQ? Obviously what he did was stupid, but he was too caught up in being right he did it anyway. Its not lazy writing, its writing him in character. Its called character flaws, ever heard of them?
Even if its fake, they have no right to destroy them. I would still sue them for emotional pain bc suing for damages aint worth for a painting worth $0
More importantly they can't actually prove a single thing they said. If my car got stolen, and I saw a car with the same make and model but the plates, VIN and color were different but I told the cops "I know it's mine because I made that exact stain over there" even if I was 100% correct, how do I prove that?
Fun fact, the "nails" in the frame... a painting is often a long time in a corner of the artist shop, and the nice "frame" is only made once the painting is sold.... so if that's years later, that would not be strange.
Who writes this excrement? People need to raise their expectations around what constitutes good television. Maybe then we wouldnt just get the same lazy shit over and over.
They split all of the talented writers into so many groups to write hundreds of these detective shows. Afterall if it airs then I makes money so why not write it
As a painter, I always count my brush strokes and agressively tell all my children and anyone I come in contact with to never change the frame of my paintings ever
Update: all of these hippies were arrested and charged with reckless vandalism of an original Picasso, they are all serving life sentences at Ruckers, island prison
This series took the Mentalist, Elementary model of super powered sleuth to a whole new level. Namely a group of obnoxious know it alls that had absolutely zero redeeming characteristics 😂❤
This was one of the artist's early paintings, so not as good as his refined style. Those 48 extra brushstrokes are hiding behind the frame, paintings almost always have a portion covered by the frame. The frame had been restored a few years after it was made (explaining the nails) This had been one of this artist's most valuable paintings... 😔 😢
......sir, you miscounted the brushstrokes due to overlapping dtrokes that nakes it immpossible to count. And ma'am we just reframed that masterpiece a few months ago, of course the nails arent from when the painting was created! Who has ever heard of an artist framing their work and no gallery or museum being allowed to remove said frame. (Do not recommend channel)
What’s funny is those type of observations is what led people to find out that at one point the Mona Lisa was fake, or at least the one being displayed is.
All I want from one of these shows where some far fetched Sherlockian deduction is made is just for the genius(es) to be flat out wrong and get arrested
The bottom line is, if you don’t own the art keep your hands off it. If you spot a fake you’re welcome to talk to whoever runs the gallery, but don’t be an a-hole.
There's like literally thousands of replies to comments talking about how come no one said anything before he ripped up the painting and those reasons that they gave were full of crap. I've never seen the show and don't even know what the name of it is but it was obvious to me that it seems like they were covering for the guy when they said those reasons why he did that. I could be wrong. But I tend to think that internet comment sections are where the lowest common denominator comes to hang out so I'm going to believe my 10-second intuition and not you guys 🙂
Someone forgot to tell the writers that even good quality prints are worth more than "nothing". An actual painted copy that's good enough to fool the museum would be pretty expensive.
Imagine your excuse for destroying the painting is “she wasn’t feeling it”.
They examined exactly why she wasn't feeling it
@@PatternLandbut at the end its literally "she didnt feel it" 😂😂
@UnchainedTerror and yet they were ALL right
😂
if my wofe dont love the prainting then down it go now i need to get a wife
Why didn’t they say anything before that? Like I understand in videos like this a lot is left out but it seems like they just did that without any warning only then saying their reasons on why he did what it did was it being a fake. Would have been a bit funny if the art director went “yeah I know it’s not the original it’s copy made for display purposes that cost a lot of money”
Yeah, that's been one of the group of geniuses' issues. To them, once it's logical, it is permissible, without care as to the feelings of anyone else. High IQ, low EQ
Why? Simple. No drama, no movie.
The show is called scorpions the entire team is a bunch of Geniuses that have social issues if I remember correctly all of them have around 180 IQ they would look at what they did as nothing wrong because I don't see that there was a better way to expose that the painting was fake and it doesn't matter if someone tries to teach them to say something first and let them test the painting they would still not understand
I believe if I remember correctly he suspected the owner was in on the scam and was testing to see his reaction. I believe he was innocent
@@hippiemama52 Could’ve been just as dramatic with the same tearing pay off at the end. It’d be the exact same story just with the scenes reversed (obv lol). Long story short, it wouldn’t have changed anything but how pleasing it was to the original commenter.
Fun fact, museums tend to not display the original priceless pieces if possible and if not they'll a protective film over the paintings to protect them from vandalism like this.
Show name: Scorpion
Thanks you stranger 🎉
On paramount plus
@@robincasey1700 don't waste your time. It's trash, and as such it was canceled.
Hey I have watched...it's a good show
Thank you! I was wracking my brain and still couldn’t come up with the name!!
No real reason to cut the painting. Just lazy Hollywood writers looking for shock value.
Perhaps... But still managed to get the attention of many people (myself included) :D
I'm wondering if the reason might possibly be because it is a TV show
@@lunchbox1553yeah, it's a TV show not a documentary on art forgery.
@xanderx51 Quiet Xander! You know TV shows and movies have to be 100% accurate! They should have taken it into a sterile room and examined it in Tyvek suits with microscopes! Then they should have shown the entire fulfillment of paperwork required for the insurance claim.
And you can do better and get millions to watch?? Didnt think so.
A forgery still has significant value especially if it’s a quality one that comes close to the original. He shouldn’t just cut it up, what a jerk.
This museum was actually scamming. The guy who freaked out had no idea but the director was buying shitty artworks. This group had suspected it (I’m not sure if you know but the show is about it a few geniuses who solve lots of money loitering crimes and other crimes) they visited the museum and this painting stood out to them as an immediate fake with no worth
I agree with you as long as the buyer knows that it is a reproduction. I buy prints. I don't have the money for originals. And don't consider the art that I have as an investment.
Especially if insurance validated it. And it is covered
The real one was stolen from the museum
That's supposed to be his character arc throughout the series, but he's kinda an asswipe for the whole show.
Oops... our analysis was incorrect. It's genuine.
That's going to leave a mark...
Hahahaha
😂😂
That'll 3 million , cash or card
1. this was the first painting of the artist, before he settled into the style we "know and love"
2. it was before he was rich and famous, so he had different brushes; cheap ones
3. the painting was reframed 50 years later
(I'm just making shit up; but it counters their "findings")
Even if it's a fake painting it's still worth something and it's also not his to vandalize.
Just like fake money isnt worth anything, the same goes for a painting. Museums and collectors deal in authenticity. Its worth jack shit and it means the museum was defrauded.
@@Geass0011 Amazon seems to disagree with you because they sell fake money.
@@Geass0011you do realize it could be a replica made by the museum for the sake of protecting the original and it would’ve still cost money to create
To an uneducated common person sure it may be worth $100. To a museum $100 is a rain drop in the ocean. Making it worthless.
The only thing that would’ve cost money is the frame you can print a fake for free
Fun fact: my old teacher used to copy famous paintings so that his boss could sell them to American companies. So he was doing illegal stuff without knowing it.😊
Not actually illegal for certain paintings. For example, the Mona Lisa is in the public domain, which means anyone can copy it. Sometimes it's even set as a challenge for art classes.
So long as you advertise them as copies and don't try to claim they're the original it is completely legal to create and sell copies of certain famous paintings.
I dunno how that is but I can definitely order a replica painting made to be the exact same size as the original (which was painted by a guy with a weird moustache) and have his signature on it for around 200$
That's what you consider a "fun fact"?
As long as they aren't sold as original and just as reproductions, they're totally legit.
A boss
This is one of those “and everyone applauded” scenarios someone wrote and then sat back with a satisfied smile. Seriously lmao
"YOU"RE HIRED" meme, which never made sense cuz the guy who just got hired is already in the business meeting.
It's from the show Scorpion. evrryone on the team are geniuses except the first woman whose son is one and robert patrick.
@@dbuzmanThank you! I was looking for the name of this. Just coincidence I found it inside another comment. 👍🏼
God, I would love if they revealed that it was, in fact, the original painting lol
The brush stroke count is obviously ridiculous.
The "oh, the fan subconsciously knows something is off" is stupid
Nails haven't changed almost at all since the industrial revolution and they also get replaced during restoration work all the time so that one is just demonstrably nonsense even if there was a date stamped on the head of the nail.
Yeah, they really should subvert this stuff a bit. Hell even if they were right on the money, they can't actually prove anything they said.
@@NeoHellPoetI don't know what show this is and I've never seen this before but I got the impression They were covering for him. So everything you're pointing out is just like Sheldon from Big bang theory not getting sarcasm for double meanings
My mom has this old oil painting,I've seen copies selling for $1800.but hers doesn't have the guy that makes the copy's signature under the original, like they have.i told her I think she has the original,I messaged a museum and they said that it's highly unlikely that I have the original, it's been lost for years and I haven't asked anyone else since.think I'm gonna take it to a college or museum for appraisal
@@NeoHellPoet funny enough, they were right. It was a fake. I saw the episode. And the guy counting the brushstrokes is actually legit, in this series (it's called Scorpion btw) he is one of, if not the smartest person in the world. It's a team made up of geniuses in different fields. But the video barely gives any context so it is of course extremely confusing.
And the funniest part is it's a worthless fake lol
Writer did his best to imagine what it is like to be smart😂😂
Being rather smart myself, I can assert that it looks nothing like this. It is much more awkward and ephemeral.
@deeperthings tf
IIRC, the guy whose life it takes inspiration from was a consultant on the show.
Good thing to know is that nails do get replaced if the painting ever needed to be worked on. Restoration happens a lot
Edit, ty for 1k likes
Nah, in this case, there’s no chance of that ever happening… because they’re super smart 🤓😂
Restoration ppl know to use the correct nails for the preservation of authenticity.
Also the painting generally comes before the frame. A painting’s frame is the equivalent to an after-market part. Like, would putting new seats in your car prove that it’s a fake car?
@TheLitRight they do have original frames, created for the art. Museums won't replace a frame unless absolutely required.
@@IsatuIceBangura They often don't use original nails because those don't really exist anymore. They use the next best thing and there was a time when they really didn't care and would even cut the original painting to fit a new frame
Theres alot of ways to tell a real painting from a fake. Counting brush strokes isnt one of them, i just know how painful is had to have been for that actor to say something soo stupid
The context is that he and the others are geniuses and that one absolutely would know and have counted the brushstrokes to find a difference. They aren’t art appraisers.
@@catherinetodd5163 no one is counting brush strokes to find out if it's fake
Suspend your disbelief
@@MaliqueGowley irl, maybe but I know someone that counts objects in a painting that should be there. (One was clouds) This is a show with characters that would. He’s ocd so he counts everything. Your point is moot.
The nails don’t have anything to say about the fact if it’s original or not. Paintings get reframed all the time
but, counting brush strokes are fucking normal I guess.
@@clethcriss6258 I don’t know about counting them. But analyzing them for sure
@@DanWi90 You are not wrong. I just wanted to point out that the painting were analysed from 5-8m far and one dude counted the brushstrokes another said the nails were not produced at the time... while standind even further. So the point is, this is a tv show with highly fictional methods. No need to point out the nail problem, when an other dude simple counted the brush strokes 5 meters from the painting.
@@clethcriss6258it's something that, if you could do it, would make sense. The issue there is that it's impossible but the premise of the show says this guy can do it, so that's fine.
The fact that you can't turn a DeLorian into a time machine doesn't hurt the quality of Back to the Future.
The nails getting replaced is a problem the premise doesn't solve. Even if the exact date was stamped on the head of the nail, it still doesn't work.
That would be the equivalent of Marty going back to the Revolutionary War instead of the 1950's but the finally is still set in a High School dance. It's an inaccuracy not covered by the premise.
It's the difference between something being real and something being realistic. You can add stuff to a show or movie that's not real. That's the definition of fiction, but if you write something that doesn't make sense even in the context of the book, show or movie, that's un realistic and a sign of bad, lazy or sloppy writing
@@NeoHellPoet But you can make a DeLorean into a time machine.
Not everyone in the comment section hating on the scene and forgetting that the museum was scamming people with painting and these guys were trying to prove that the paintings are fake 😂😂😂😂
The reasons that they chose to try and improve it was fake or bad you simpleton
as an artist i think he could just argue the case? destroying it is over the top. rembrandt had students, Andy Warhol had his factory, sometimes the artist is having a bad day. this is typical hollywood simplification. they do not know a damn thing? if you are a real plumber, and watch tv , you scream about bad plumbers on tv. and if you are a dentist , you scream about tv dentists. Hollywood always does a half arsed job. of real workmen.
Gell-Mann Amnesia Effect or Knolls Law of Media Accuracy. Or at least something similar since those 2 deal with news.
@@markuhler2664 a law for media accuracy? are you insane, they lie about everything. I have seen it first hand. I worked in a auction house, they were selling a painting, valued at £100,000 , it was in the front window, and old lady passed by, saw the painting, recognized it as a painting stolen from her neighbour. She contacted the police. they came around , took the painting, arrested the thief, and the newspaper reported that a sharp eyed copper, saw the painting in the window, so the police got a BOOST, they get credit. The old lady might not have wanted any credit? The news papers lie about everything. I would not read one, ever. its BS. and tabloids are really beyond the pale. I saw thievery every week. Its covered up even by respectable men,. men of high rank. Its a big Joke. they have patsies that take the blame, if they can't buy off the parties. The auction houses are rife with corruption. today you see an investigation with the British Museum. lots stolen from them. Its a vast joke. and you quote a law of media accuracy? as if that meant a thing? i love the way that college kids, and university people TONE DOWN larceny. WIth theories and laws. They quote a law, to cover a massacre. or a theft of billions. to make it sound academic.
while the little man serves out 25 years in a jail. and the rich man gets out in six months. with lawyers.
Ah yes, bc how dare Hollywood not make an in-depth analysis for a 2 min scene lmfao.
As a "genius" person with an iq pretty similar to those claimed in this show I believe they did a fairly accurate job of what an actual "genius" would do in this situation. Had they brought it to the attention of the curator he would have denied it and never investigated it because that could potentially cost him millions of dollars plus the bad press and reputation. I use the word "genius" like this because highly intelligent people don't think like the normal person. It's not that they are smarter because we are not, it's that we think about things in a different and more efficient way than the average person that makes us do better on an iq test. I never claim to be smarter than the next person even though my iq has been tested to be around 150 putting me right around the top .1% of the population because honestly im stupid to a lot of subjects but if I know about something more than the next person I would so do something as shocking to prove the point. They actually did a very good job with the show even though its exaggerated.
@@That_big_guy So as a genius, what have you done with your super ego? Got a cure for cancer? or solved a few math problems. what have you done to help mankind. i keep hearing people tell me about their intellect. and all they are doing is messing about on YT with all the rest of humanity. An IQ test is geared towards puzzles. if you have never had to rotate shapes? done crossword puzzles, played chess. then you don't understand what you are doing? Same as if i pass a tool to a physics professor. Here professor , fix the electric socket. The professor pays a man to do that. I know many a genius, who cannot change a light bulb. who are lost when it comes to simple tasks. Who cannot speak to a girl. Intelligence is a trick. if you spend all day doing IQ tests for a month, then take it, you get a high score, as you know what sort of things appear. its like chess puzzles, you know its not the simple choice. an expert is someone that does the task day in, day out. Knows his business. specialist.
The T-1000 didn’t notice those details? 😮
Damn clancker
Wasn't programed for other things but not art
It wasn't titled A Portrait of Sarah and Son.
T-2000. 1000 is Arnold, 2000 was the liquid metal one.
ruclips.net/video/bhL8WlDHKaY/видео.htmlsi=bpyTGIZOlx7tkr7d
That girl is a beauty.
I was looking for this comment
Truly gorgeous. Here? Flawless.
She's hot asf
"I stand to be corrected" its always up throat
But again I hate to say "I told you so"😂😂😂
They should never have cancelled this show.
i agree, it was actually interesting to watch.
This show tended to go to the dramatic gestures more and more as it went on. Sometimes they produced these big genius solutions when there was a simpler one available. I enjoyed the show overall, but mostly in the early episodes.
Yeah the scope of the issues they dealt with went into superhero territory after the first season. It made everything less believable
Petition to get rid of that background sound, it is in too many videos and must be stopped .
Sign below to cease the noise.
Below Where? I'm sick of it!
I know it's annoying
The description if this video. The inaccuracy 💀
This show seems to be written for people that were told they were special and could be anything they could be anything while growing up
That is better than how this actually came to be.
Brush Strokes. I think they forgot that an artist normally makes multiple of one painting. There is no one Mona Lisa there were dozens of Mona Lisas
Yes but also lots fakes mona Lisa too do they one guy bought a fake one at action one time and they almost use all same examples as this movie did do😅😬
I agree with you on that. My grandfather was a painter and did as much as 5 of some of his paintings, the "master" and copies with some tiny variations.
Also a painting can be removed from its original frame at some point and then later reframed (did it with him on old paintings), so the nails argument is nill also.
2 da Vinci Mona Lisas
What? Artists don't fucking do that lmfao.
That's not true at all.
The part I enjoyed most about this short, was the background music. I cannot express adequately the suspenseful joy gives me. 🥰🥰🥰
4 years after the painting was made, it would make it old and probably have some value.
Was supposedly made
I MISS this show so much!
I can’t fucking escape this music
This show deserved closure.
Name of the show?
Ah, I know the redhaired guy. He is a day player who has appeared in thousands of tv shows by now. He was a buddy of mine in Los Angeles back in the days when I was an aspiring actor there... Great guy. Never became a start. Became an eternal day player.
Raphael Sbarge? Pretty sure he has a pretty big role in Once Upon A Time
Okay, but say his name though. If you know who he is, you were buddies, and he's been in thousands of things, say his name.
@@MakoKitten Brandon Lee Mulligan
I’m glad T-1000 has found a peaceful retirement after his battle with T-800
But he got caught, also still a crime even if it isn't the original
Love the angry comment because its vandalism. It's a show. No actual painting were harmed in the making of the episode. 😂
It's a movie, make believe what people pretending to be somebody they are not.
The manufactured Nails in the frame is only circumstantial and not a Surefire guarantee about the paintings authenticity😅
Not to mention. Nails would have been replaced many times by now anyway. People restore and replace that kind of stuff on old paintings for a living. It's also on a public floor, so it's obviously a replica. No museum actually publically showcases the original.
Bro really said "It's fake, vibes were off."
They make a big deal out of this but some museums do actually use replicas instead of the real thing (it isn’t common but it still happens)
This entire show is like this. You have a bunch of geniuses with poor interpersonal skills who are able to bond with this normal lady who can translate the world to them.
This is such anime reasoning 😂
I love it when she says, "Ummm, I stand corrected." 😂😂😂😂😂
Yeah even CSI couldn't believe that shit😂
I love how ppl are all irritated about the value of a painting even if it's a fake 😂😂😂 it's a show so it's a prop it's value is probably 20 bucks calling the actor a jerk for doing it 😂😂 y'all make me laugh
You can’t count brushstrokes💀
He can, at least in the show. It's called Numbers and each of them has some sort ir rainman super talent. Like A Team with nerds.
But you could count visible brush strokes.
In rainman the guy counted toothpicks spilled on the floor with just a glance from an almost full box in seconds.
These savants do exist. I can tell you how much money will disappear from my wallet every day without even looking. 😂😂😂
@@Altmetalpunk it would be impossible. Some of them would be the same brushstroke, but you’re mistaken. Others could be something other than a brushstroke.
@@mark9561smol error this is scorpion
I mean, he clearly got caught. He just didn’t get in trouble.
Even if is not the original a good copy can worth a lot. More if is old enought.
it was made a week before this
Those liquid metal terminators don't seem to age so well as the Arnie version...!!!
Dude in the hat was with stiflers mom in American Pie lol.
Never underestimate the Antics and the ability to solve any problem with a room full of Geniuses.
Hey guys, just wanted to know if yall heard the part about him not having EQ? Obviously what he did was stupid, but he was too caught up in being right he did it anyway. Its not lazy writing, its writing him in character. Its called character flaws, ever heard of them?
Yeah, but emotional intelligence aside, it's still someone else's property. And you can't guarantee that they won't take you to court over this.
@@Leto2ndAtreides right... that doesn't change the fact that what he did is in character for him.
i'm so mad this got discontinued :( i've watched it like 5 times it's soooo good
Even if its fake, they have no right to destroy them. I would still sue them for emotional pain bc suing for damages aint worth for a painting worth $0
And even a reproduction or copy would have some value. The main point being it was not his property to destroy regardless of its pedigree.
More importantly they can't actually prove a single thing they said.
If my car got stolen, and I saw a car with the same make and model but the plates, VIN and color were different but I told the cops "I know it's mine because I made that exact stain over there" even if I was 100% correct, how do I prove that?
Fun fact, the "nails" in the frame... a painting is often a long time in a corner of the artist shop, and the nice "frame" is only made once the painting is sold.... so if that's years later, that would not be strange.
it being fake doesnt excuse destorying it
Scorpion, the genius in mindset, WOW, phonomenal abilities!!!
Who writes this excrement? People need to raise their expectations around what constitutes good television. Maybe then we wouldnt just get the same lazy shit over and over.
You’re entitled to your opinion, but that’s all it is. Your opinion.
And then everyone clapped.
They split all of the talented writers into so many groups to write hundreds of these detective shows. Afterall if it airs then I makes money so why not write it
This was a great show though my dad used to love it when it was still new and the ratings were good you’re just a butthurt little baby
Totally agree. This show is cringy.
Good Ol "Scorpion"
Love that show. It's sad they didn't keep it going.
Since when did Jiminy Cricket work in an art museum lol
I'm working my way through "Once Upon a Time", and I totally missed that.
You know even fake paintings are worth something, it's hard to replicate something beautiful with such precision,
As a painter, I always count my brush strokes and agressively tell all my children and anyone I come in contact with to never change the frame of my paintings ever
The artist😮😵 even if it's fake having an almost perfect copy from the original is still worth millions😊
Update: all of these hippies were arrested and charged with reckless vandalism of an original Picasso, they are all serving life sentences at Ruckers, island prison
I’m happy to see scorpion popping up in my recommended I loved this show
Is it me or the cutting feels like it should go to asmr? HIGH LEVEL.
Great show❤
Show name
@@basheermoh3scorpion I think 🤔
A fantastic example of when writers attempt to write dialogue for characters that are supposed to be smarter than they themselves are.
This series took the Mentalist, Elementary model of super powered sleuth to a whole new level.
Namely a group of obnoxious know it alls that had absolutely zero redeeming characteristics 😂❤
Scorpion is literally my favorite TV series. They're all amazing
Series is called “Scorpion” and it’s pretty good!
😂😂😂😂 a quick count on the brush strokes like anybody just counts brush strokes
Movie name is Scorpion 🦂🦂🦂
Scorpion was such an underrated show, everything about it was amazing
Fake or not it’s still vandalism.
If a fake is good enough to make experts believe it was real without overwhelming evidence.. it genuinely has value as a replica.
This was one of the artist's early paintings, so not as good as his refined style. Those 48 extra brushstrokes are hiding behind the frame, paintings almost always have a portion covered by the frame. The frame had been restored a few years after it was made (explaining the nails)
This had been one of this artist's most valuable paintings... 😔 😢
I just hope they bring back these show..
Okay, it's a fake. Sure, but that doesn't make it less illegal.
The way he said rotten meat, brushstrokes and Nails had me😂
......sir, you miscounted the brushstrokes due to overlapping dtrokes that nakes it immpossible to count. And ma'am we just reframed that masterpiece a few months ago, of course the nails arent from when the painting was created! Who has ever heard of an artist framing their work and no gallery or museum being allowed to remove said frame. (Do not recommend channel)
What’s funny is those type of observations is what led people to find out that at one point the Mona Lisa was fake, or at least the one being displayed is.
“Do you know what that’s worth?”
“Nothing, it’s been cut”
I've always hated Scorpion with a burning passion, and that feeling of disdain only grows with every braindead scene I see of it
All I want from one of these shows where some far fetched Sherlockian deduction is made is just for the genius(es) to be flat out wrong and get arrested
I love this show SO much. Walter rocks.
❤😂
My favorite part of the show is the song.
The bottom line is, if you don’t own the art keep your hands off it. If you spot a fake you’re welcome to talk to whoever runs the gallery, but don’t be an a-hole.
That guy in the glasses who counted the brush strokes is a dead ringer for the fella that helps people figure out their debt/credit on RUclips.
Fake/replicas especially near the original cost a lot
Guess the writers have been reading "Blink" by Malcolm Gladwell
This was from the show Scorpion by the way
Great show👍👍❤️❤️
Bruh they could still just want the painting even if it is fake but now its cut up
Malcolm Gladwell's book Blink explains this very well. How you know something subconsciously before you actually know it
this show.... is so bizarre and unrealistic its insane.
this whole scene reeks of someone who went to college for art school got in massive debt and wanted a reason to use their useless knowledge
I wish they'd bring back this show.
Fact
Same background music in a million movie clips online.
being a fake doesn't make it worthless... $$$$
There's like literally thousands of replies to comments talking about how come no one said anything before he ripped up the painting and those reasons that they gave were full of crap.
I've never seen the show and don't even know what the name of it is but it was obvious to me that it seems like they were covering for the guy when they said those reasons why he did that.
I could be wrong. But I tend to think that internet comment sections are where the lowest common denominator comes to hang out so I'm going to believe my 10-second intuition and not you guys 🙂
Walter was right - the revulsion on Paige’s face was very subtle, but it was there.
Great acting job, Katharine! 😛
Someone forgot to tell the writers that even good quality prints are worth more than "nothing". An actual painted copy that's good enough to fool the museum would be pretty expensive.
Why isn't this show more popular?
This scene: