2024 VW Golf 8 Variant 1.5 TSI Facelift Manual (116 PS) TEST DRIVE
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 авг 2024
- 2024 VW Golf 8 Variant 1.5 TSI Manual
85 kW / 114 HP / 116 PS
1.5L Turbo Petrol Gasoline Engine
1498 cm3 / 91.4 CUI
4-Cylinder
220 Nm / 162 ft-lb
6-Speed Manual
1369 kg / 3018 lbs
TEST DRIVE
Interior & Cockpit Design
Exterior Design
Driving & Sound / POV
Computer & Entertaiment on Board
Light Night Design
Fuel Consumption from 80 to 200 kmh (50 to 124 mph)
Acceleration 0-170 kmh 
Авто/Мото
It has fuel consumption as if it were a diesel and great acceleration. Volkswangen knows its work.
if they dont lie on fuel computer
Diesel is better
@@kaancaglar7076 yes and no!!depend on mileage and how much it car costs
For a 116 hp engine almost unbelievable acceleration and top speed figures and basically identical to the previous 130 hp version. Great consumption too thanks to the very long gearing.
probably it is 130hp but on paper they set on 116 because of taxes in some countries
Biggest suprise of 2024 so far consumption and performance
I‘m happy that VW doesn’t Downsize the engines that much… 116 PS compared to 1.5L is very good👍 Like the 1.6 FSI 115 PS
they have that 1.0tsi with 110-115hp but thast one are much worse in everything
excellent engine for consumption and performance
For sure. I have the same 1.5 TSI with 130hp and the performance is exactly the same. I’m sure the dyno would show around 130 hp instead of 115
I don't like this generation of Golf and prefer the seats of the Seat Leon, but this engine's efficiency makes this a car you cannot avoid considering in this class. Amazing if you drive a lot of highway kilometers with speeds between 100-130!
GOOD 🙂🙂
80 km 2.9L excellent value, and then if not variant maybe 2.7L
And if sedan like jetta it will better than hat. Sedan has always better aerodynamic as hatch
No one seems to mention the front grill which has way to much "visible" space, you can see the radiator which looks ugly. Also front assist is put from the logo down in that area.
Decent daily.
Could you mesure the time from 80 to 120 km/h? It would be very useful for most of us. Thank you.
👍👍👍👍👍
👍👍👍👍👍
👍👍👍👍👍
👍👍👍👍👍
1:03 poor glasses! The engine must be more powerfull than they declare or the speedometer is very optimistic.
Lol the glasses are old, will order soon new glasses 😅
what is that color ?
Wie kann es sein, dass es mit 160 U/min im 6. Gang geht? Bei einem 1,5-Liter-Motor mit 150 PS scheint das unmöglich zu sein.
This is a 140-150 hp performance, considerig the weight of the car, too. Are you sure it's really the 116 hp version?
its downgraded only by electronic and maybe exchaust ,and similar!1 on dyno it probably have around 130
It was 100% 116 ps, on car regristration paper was written 85 kw and 1498 cm3
@@TESTDRIVEFREAK interesting engine configuration, considering the real performace
10,8 with 200kmh ,its only few diesels have that or something less
Why does it sound like a diesel?
If you drive most time in the city do you know the consumption??
Go to in our channel, there is already city drive with fuel consumption
thanks !!
sembra abbia almeno 130cv
The MK7 had way better interior quality compared to this and better design without this tablet-screen. But I really like the engine, nice consumption and good performance for daily driving.
Not really. Mk7 looks very old inside and the plastic feels cheap.
the 1.5 TSI is really an air pump, I would recommend the 2 liter TDI
I was speaking with mechanic in Skoda dealer. He told me that they get more cars with 2.0TDI than TSI which has problems. Due to TDI are very overloaded with all this “eco” shit like AdBlue system etc.
But you've seen the acceleration? Even with the 116HP version, 0-100 9s. Not an airpump at all in my opinion. And it has a timing belt, so way less headache with timing chains.
@@MFSE7EN
Replacement in every 4 years is expensive....
@@jt7891 if you drive 240.000km in 4 years..😂😂😂
@@jt7891 Volkswagen timing chains are shit.
My God, what an awful -looking car.