Bombardier CRJ - the adventures of a Canadian cigar
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 сен 2024
- Bombardier CRJ (Canadair Regional Jet) is a regional airliner family, developed in the 1990s. The family is quite large and divided, conditionally, on two generations: CRJ100 and 200, and their successors CRJ700, 900 and 1000.
The whole company became very popular in the aviation world, for now approximately 1,900 planes have been delivered.
Thank you for watching!
Subscribe to the channel, comment, like!
If you want to support Skyships and our work, welcome to our Patreon. We will create some special content for you there: / skyships
Our Facebook: / skyshipscom
This plane has a special place in my heart. I worked for Skywest for 7 years
That’s cool, I just got a job as an A&P AMT yesterday in Fresno! I noticed they pay 25hr 5 bucks less than the major airlines, but it looks like a nice employer to work for. What was one thing you liked the most and why did you leave?
@@arcerudy3 SkyWest has great flight benefits. I was forced quit because my husband became terminally ill. I would probably still be in the system if the story was different
The 175s are better say for a few quirks, like the aliron disconnect and the apu fuel crossfeed bullshit
It’s a very stabler jet. Beautiful shape
This is the plane every pilot should start their career on. It's a quite difficult plane to fly and it doesn't allow you to sit back and relax. If you can fly this one, you can fly everything.
No.
I’m pretty sure a CRJ pilot would wreck a Navajo they had to hand fly on steam gauges with no flight director... or a Republic SeeBee doing a glassy water landing... or a Pitts Special trying to take off.... etc etc etc.
Push buttons, and don’t use VS mode to climb to FL410... and you’ll be fine.
Bartonovich52 what do you mean? 100% use VS to get to 410. If you climb in speed mode she porpoises like crazy after 340.
@@Bartonovich52 As a lifer at OO, I have over 9,000 hrs. on the CRJ series...not sure what makes you think I'd be too dumb to fly other airplanes without wrecking them but it's a pretty arrogant (ignorant) assumption to troll other pilots like that. Long ago, I earned a type on the 737-200, which makes a Navajo look like a tricycle. I would never suggest that you (as a pilot) would be incapable of earning the same type certificate with enough training and practice. ...unless you aren't capable of course. ...still not for me to decide. Pilots (real pilots) are typically pretty diligent about safety, no matter what they fly.
You are 100% wrong about the use of vertical speed mode by-the-way. The CRJ really isn't happy at 410...no matter how you get there. ...and you probably won't be "fine".
Lmaoo no. This plane has all types of automated systems, the ERJ family 135-145 doesn’t even have auto throttle.
@@jaredkeller6208 neither does the CRJ lol
Happy to have been one of many to recommend Brussels Airlines to replace its Sukhoi fleet with CRJ-900 and CRJ-1000. They followed the advice.
I would agree with taller passengers who feel claustrofobic. But it's a very enjoyable and quiet plane. The limited number of passengers also helps to increase boarding speed.
The Bombardier C series is truly a Canadian engineering marvel that is decades ahead of any aircraft flying.
Airbus will take the a 220 to the next level.
It’s just a amazing aircraft to fly.
Cheers 🇨🇦
Having flown on CRJs many times, I have concluded that there is no one over 6 feet tall in Canada.
yeah I’m 6’1” and my girlfriend is 5’11” (about 182cm each) and we flew in a couple of these recently and disembarking sucked because either we had to remain seated or one of stand in the isle which felt rude. My father was with us and he’s 6’4” and he is unable to shut the restroom door on these planes standing up lol.
I am Canadian and 6'2" and I know of which you speak. They I think decided to keep a similar diameter fuselage as the business jet Challenger.
Still one of the best looking aircraft! So much ahead of its time for its timeless design!!
Uh..... about 25 years later than the Caravelle... 35 if you count from the CRJ vs the Challenger.
I agree, it is a beautiful airplane on the outside. I really love the way it looks!
But Embraer now has a better product with the E-190. It has a better passenger experience, roomier, more comfortable, etc. But the CRJ still looks better in my opinion!
@@flightmaster999 The ERJ looks goofy, has a weird rake to it. CRJ is a very sporty look, which I've always liked. Of course.. these things don't matter.
I was working for LearAvia when Bill Lear was planning for the Learstar. Video takes me back aways. I'm glad it finally got to fly.
The CRJ is definitely one of my all time favorite passenger planes!
I've flown the CRJ 1000 from Madrid to Turin..very nice plane...Madrid's turbulence makes it rock though
I fell in love with this aircraft when I first flew in it. It's amazing.
the planes i grew up with never look old to me. the new ones just look like prototypes, to me at least. like they're too smooth.
I like The CRJ700 and 701 I still love the Embrear E170 & E175
Technically Bombardier is an old company from the 1940s and started off by making snowmobiles and moved on from there into trains, boats, then planes.
They existed, but hadn’t moved into aviation yet. Since then they have spun off the Ski-doo production.
Peorhum they build locomotives, streetcars, subway/metro car's.
@@frankdenardo8684 Don't forget if it wasn't for Montreal mayor Jean Drapeau, Bombardier might have never have built metro cars. He's the one that convinced them to build their MR-73 cars in the 1970s. They had never built anything but snowmobiles. Montreal Locomotive Works and Canadian Vickers also put out tender for the 2nd generation of Montreal métro cars which Bombardier won and built at the plant at La Pocatière, QC.
Snowmobiles were invented in the 1960s last time I checked.
@@spingebill8551 In 1935 Joseph-Armand Bombardier assembled and successfully tested the first snowmobile. It was a vehicle with a sprocket wheel and a track drive system, and it was steered by skis.
The CANADAIR-built Water Bombers were fantastic. (At 1:13 of the video)
Amazing aircraft, too bad people just keep getting wider and wider...
Actually, my problem with these small planes isn't my width - it's my height. I'm fed up of having to contort my neck and upper back like a pretzel just to avoid giving myself a concussion while getting into or out of my seat.
CJWJR yeah I’m 6’1” and my girlfriend is 5’11” (about 182cm each) and we flew in a couple of these recently and disembarking sucked because either we had to remain seated or one of stand in the isle which felt rude. My father was with us and he’s 6’4” and he is unable to shut the restroom door on these planes standing up lol.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
go keto
I’m 6’9 lol
Mid 90s CVG to Yonkers 6 times a year.
A hoot to fly on..
A real hot rod !
Just about every delta CRJ900 I'm have flown on had either consistent cabin temperature problems or cabin pressure fluctuation problems. If your near 6' tall or more, your hating life on there too. Only thing i like is it you get 1st class on the left side, there is no one next to you. Why they use these for 3 hour flights, guess cheap to run.
The CRJ 100s and 200s are a/k/a “The Devil Chariots”-for the torture they inflict on their passengers! LOL
Except the CRJ 700 and 900 and 1000 those are better
I've flown in these and they are like flying in your own private jet.
I love this plane, I prefer it above a 737 or A320(and relatives). very comfortable indeed!
I've only flown this plane once, and it was a wonderful little plane. I'd fly on it again...
Having flown on the CRJ and EJet in many part of the world, I would pick CRJ every time even though i can only fit in the aisle seat, because the CRJ has a soul, Ejet is just an Ejet, like 747 vs rest.
If I had about $1billion in networth, I'd get me one of those 650's. They're cool and just the right size for my family.
if i have 1B i would rather take the Global 7500
i did not know all these things about this type of aircraft..very informative
The CRJ program was sold to Mitsubishi and production stops in 2020. They are getting out of commercial aviation
SkyShips the best
Yeah I find it really funny that Bombardier and Embraer are huge regional competitors and Skywest Operates both Airliners. CRJ 200/700/900 ERJ-175's They also used to operate the Older EMB 120's but retired them back in 2015.
I agree, Skyships is the best.
Make one for the Sukhoi SSJ 100 please!
Love these videos!
Canada is too cold to make cigars. :D
pete5668 all the cigars come from Cuba.
Ignorant comment!
Lol, I live in Quebec and there is a cigar factory near the bus station I go to.
pete5668 most places can make cigars
Frank Denardo I hope you’re joking
I love crj900 and 1000 I work for 10 years at comair and later on at Endeavor air for 5 years great plane
Wow @2.20! I did not know that CRJ had jet engines with propellers.
There’s a Bombardier Q400 behind the CRJ on that portion of the video. CRJ had never had propellers.
Thank you
Canadair: CRJ
Embraer: ERJ
Comac: ARJ
Mitsubishi: MRJ
Sukhoi: RRJ
UAC: maybe rebrand?
Sukhoi: Ok, now it's the SuperJet
Mitsubishi: MRJ is now SpaceJet even though it can't go to space
Mitsubishi: CRJ?
Excellent video about Canada´s regional airplanes history. I have always wondered why Bombardier had entered into the so-competed single-aisle market being the leader of the regional segment, the answer is: Embraer. Now it is Embraer´s new E2 version who will try to gain a position into the market the new Bombardier´s CS Series is intended to.
Bombardier always makes the best aircraft in the world
Having flown the same routes on CRJs and EMB190s, I can say the embraers are far more spacious and comfortable overall
The Embraers have more roomy cabins. Even the ERJ with its3 seats in a row
Trash4Cash If you’re flying alone the single seat on the left side of the ERJ is perfect.
Unless you've flown on the CRJ1000, it's not really a fair comparison. The E190 is a mainline aircraft with 100 or more seats; the CRJ 700/900 tops out at 76-78 seats.
Mirza Ahmed Yeah but the E170/175 are about the same size as a CRJ-700.
Bombardier I know have seen the driver and they are unanimous that the crj have better structures and built quality/parts. They are safer and more reliable..and more quiet. Have you flown both? I did!
Thanks for the serie of video's even your voice is nice to listning to
Yes, his voice is clear and i undestood all words. nice voice from the narrator
I like your in-depth videos. Since you're doing regional planes. How about turboprops. ATR 72 and Bombardier dash-8 400? Seems everyone overlooks these planes.
Used this plane a lot. Lufthansa mostly. I love it. Too bed it had to be discontinued
the Bombardier CRJ program was sold in july 2019 to Mitsubishi Heavy industry!
Total insanity...considering the Billions of Taxpayer support...over the decades.
This bird looks very appealing
Awesome
What is with everyone below criticizing your accent? Should we all sound like we are from the swamps of Louisiana and Miss? The east end of London? Such a silly attitude, you speak fine and inform well aways Mr Skyships, don't change a thing?
We don’t have that many swamps in MS. A lot of Delta to the northwest. Lots of hills in the northeast and east central. Lots of coastal area to the south. But southwest? Yeah it gets yee yee Cajun swamp over that way. We don’t go that way.
Great airplane for it’s time! The best regional jet by many meauseures! CS100/300 ie... A220 is going to be just as good.
Theye serve a different purpose in todays market. The CRJ is still fairly economical to buy and operate. The CSeries (aka A220) is a modern aircraft that comes at a much higher cost and much more technology.
In fact the myth that Bill Lear was responsible for the Challenger is false. The truth is Canadair took his Ideas and added the wide body and improved the wing. Bill Lear hated it and call it fat and ugly but of course by then he was well out of the chain of decisions.
No. Bill Lear did most of the preliminary drawings and concepts. About the only thing that was changed was the position of the tailplane... which perhaps contributed to one loss during testing.
Great history of the CRJ! My only disagreement with your video is bringing the 717/A318 into the discussion. These aircraft are significantly larger, around 45% larger than the CRJ900 and E175, and I don’t think they were direct competitors.
It’s where the market shifted. Those aircraft-along with the 737-600-completely disappeared because there were smaller aircraft that fit markets better.
Remember when there were 19 seat aircraft like the Metro and 1900? Or 30 seat planes like the SAAB 340, Dornier 328, and Dash 8 100/200? Or larger single aisle planes like the 757-300?
All gone because of planes like the Dash-8 Q400, the CRJ Series, the 737-800, the A320 and A321 etc etc which fit airline’s needs perfectly.
I have flown on a few of these. It was kind of smaller then the 737 remember having to crunch down to look out the window. Otherwise a nice plane
Well, that's because it is smaller than a 737. It is in a totally different segment, the 737 is a huge plane in comparison. The Airbus A220 is also smaller than the 737, and the 220 is bigger than the CRJ. The CRJ is basically a scaled up business jet, the 737 is a scaled down 707.So, yeah, it would be hard to make it seem as big as a 737. On the other hand, the smaller size has many benefits in cost and performance, which is why people buy it.
I'm flying on an Air Nstrum (For Iberia Regional) Bombardier CRJ1000 in August (2018)
Excellent legroom.
this is my new favorite channel
In my opinion, it's Bombardier's own fault for why the CRJ series is now outdated, as they never upgraded their avionics sufficiently over the years. Crj 1000s still carry around heavy CRT screen displays! That's unacceptable in this modern age. And the CF-34s are simply outdated when we speak of efficiency and range.
Christopher Coke Robinson what about the cseries?
DiegoTheGreat89 I sincerely believe the CSeries is playing in a different league.
Too bad the C series went to Airbus. It's lame having three aircraft manufacturers. I miss MD and Lockheed being in the mix.
Love your channel keep it up!
The CF-34 8C is a good engine, however for the CRJ 900 it requires a C1 rating and the higher thrust rating and ITT burn out the stage 1 High Pressure Turbine blades. I’ve pulled many HPT modules because of missing blades.
Budget airline love regional jets because customers do not expect comfort.
Expect to be uncomfortable.
Ummm. What budget airline has RJs? Unless you’re counting the E175/195. Which are fairly comfortable airplanes. I don’t know of any?
I rode in a NWA Mesaba CRJ900 one time. I didn't seem cramped to me. It seemed to move quicker than an a319,a320 and b737-600.
And people equate discomfort with value... as surely as they do seeing the beams and girders and pallets and forklifts in their local Costco.
I flew on the Air Canada CRJ900 a few months ago from Edmonton to Toronto and as someone who is 6'3, I can tell you that it felt cramped and uncomfortable. For the price Air Canada charged me (nearly $600 after taxes and fees), it was a very bad value for the comfort and experience I got. Should've flown on WestJet's B737 instead. The interior design of the CRJ900 didn't look modern or premium compared to a Boeing or Airbus aircraft. That will probably be the last time I fly in a Bombardier commercial jet. Boeing or Airbus only from now on.
can you do a video about ATR 72-600, please..
Tim Wynn And Dash 8 Q300/400 too.
Excellent content! I really enjoy your videos.
I am looking forward to the Fokker 70/100
yeah, i love this airplanes too
This video was very enjoyable with Borat narration
Might be wrong, but looks like several videos were taken at Portland. Let me know
Will you do the BAe-146?
my favorite
very good information aviation manufacturing in Canada
Great video! I'm more of an Embraer fan, so I'm looking forward to an ERJ one. Though despite being an Embraer fan, I will say that the CSeries looks great.
Nice video, your accent makes it that much better
I'm working on it)
Don't worry mate, not everyone is a native english speaker (yours truly included). Your accent is very easy for me to understand and I love watching your videos. Keep up the good work!
CaptainOShow is
I also love your accent.
CaptainOShow Which accent is it? It sounds a bit like Finnish but I'm not sure.
Skyward with skyships.
Good show
CRJ-100/200 is the Devil's Chariot, you never mentioned how terrible and uncomfortable they are.
I’ll be working on a 200 in 3hrs - lucky me 🙄
Since you made this video, they've launchd the 550 - series 700 airframe, but only 50 seats, so that it only requires 1 FA.
Trying to sell an old 'stretched' 9-passenger Model-T Ford is very difficult when you have more modern vehicles coming out that are updated and have better passenger comfort.
You are mistaken. The end plane produced was very different and totally different from the plans originally initiated by Lear. The Challenger was a new modern evolution. Hence why Lear couldn’t claim any credit or money’s. A Canadian marvel.
This time garuda already have it :)
aaaand they regret it..
@@MNHambali why they regret it?
Because it's not efficient, bring loss to the airline. right now their fleet CRJ1000 are being transfered to their subsidiary, Citilink.
Their CRJ1000 is transfered to Citilink meanwhile Garuda's new CRJ1000NG has arrived.
How many crashed?
Will you make a videos about Emraer ERJ and E-Jets?
Yeah, I'm waiting E2)
Frank Galeon i think, next video will be about Embraer
TO THIS "SKYSHIPENG BLOGGER," MANY THANKS TO THIS "ENGINEER CEO THRU FREQUENT FLYER FOR THE CRJ SERIES," AND Y'ALL, "CONGRATS"!!
Good video 👍👌
Skyships Eng Great video sir! Can you make a series about Russian/Soviet airliners? Would love to know MORE than just the SSJ 100 and MC 21.
Cole Phelps he made video about MC21
Эрдэм Эрдынеев Yes. I watched it already. I meant I want more Russian and or Soviet aircraft besides those
I have to fly on a CRJ900 American Eagle in 2 weeks. Flight is only 1.5 hr but I just found out its not even American Airlines. It's a company called Mesa Airlines. I have a bad fear of flying as it is, and now I have to put my faith & trust in a company I've never heard of and a plane that I've never been in that small. So needless to say, I'm freaking out.
Well, I hope that you got over your freekiness. Mesa are fine, as are all the regionals for the job they do servicing little places like Caspar and Fargo, et al.
Actually it was originally the challengair 604..private jet
I love this channel
My guess: Sukhoi SuperJet 100.
Correction: reply to Junayd Shahid's question.
You should make a followup episode on this, considering that Embraer actually stole the design for the E-Jet from Bombardier (some engineers can't come back to Canada or they'll be jailed).
Afterwards we eventually developped the concept into the C series, but facing brutal 125% tarifs from the Trump administration, we ended up giving it to Airbus, and it is now the A310.
But the financial strain of developping multiple aircrafts in the post 2008 crisis era led to Bombardier selling it's rail division to Alstom, and the CRJs to Mitsubishi...
i like it.
I Wanna build Planes when I'm older
Never know that garuda indonesia had a crj1000...i used to flew with garuda's atr 72 for regional....
Please do a dash 8 q-400 vid
The aerodynamics of the larger 900/1000 defy logic as to weight distribution. The wings are set back, the engines tail mounted, baggage appears to be confined to the rear left side. So WHERE IS THE BALANCE??!! And yet watching operations with near max loads the planes seem to operate normally.
When you said the main competitor is the E170/190, i was like, ooh that's a nice plane. When they turn on final, you can fee l the pilots hot-dogging just a little bit. They are smaller and more nimble than the heavies, and you can tell they enjoy flying them. I bet they talk about whether it will do a barrel roll.
I flew on one of these from Detroit to Dallas. That isn't a region. That's three regions on the most uncomfortable plane I've ever ridden on. I stuffed napkins in my ears to muffle the noise from the engines. It was a bumpy ride all the way . The Embraer I flew on was quite nice in comparison.
No offense but "Erj" actually stands for "Enterprise Rejional Jet" :)
The cockpit windows on crj are so sleek
Rest in peace 216AG.
I never liked flying on the CRJ's. Nice enough cabin. It's the cabin windows that bother me. Unless you're a kid or short They're so low you have to stand up or look across the aisle to see out. I like the Embraer regional jets much more.
The alternative is to put them so high up the fuselage you can only see upwards. There is only so much you can do with a small diameter fuselage. if you put the windows at eye level, it means they will be on the upper part of the fuselage slope and will lean steeply inwards, making it hard to see down. I suspect in customer surveys they found that people found that being able to see downwards was more important than being able to see out easily.
Why do jets that have their engines at the back also have their wing almost at the back of the aircraft instead of being placed at the centre?
Center of Gravity
you also get more lift from the wing not being obstructive by the engine
also engine would be too low to ground sucking in debris
8:56-9:17 this is aircraft garuda indonesia 🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩 greetings from indonesian
You didn't make any mention of the Global Express
8:35 my Frontier!!! :-)
Nice plane but the ERJ is superior.
You sound a lot like Kreosan.
As you mentioned in Embraer ERJ video, for regional airliners engines are too close to ground if mounted under wings, so both Bombardier CRJ and Embraer ERJ have engines mounted at the rear. But the new models Embraer E-jets and Bombardier CSeries both have engines mounted under wings, just like the larger airliners such as A320 or Boeing 737. So could you please explain what has changed?
I am not sure what you are asking.
@@goblinkok You have to be more specific because I don't think I was unclear.
@@joseph_wei What you are asking doesnt make sense there is nothing wrong with low mounted engines.
@@goblinkok I am not saying it is wrong. It happens on bigger planes. On smaller planes however that is a problem (there isn't enough room under wings, engines would be too close to the ground). To make the problem clearer have a look of Honda jet, which is a even smaller jet. Do you think they would have put the engines on top of the wings if there is room underneath of the wings?
@@joseph_wei The new erj and c series are significantly larger, even larger than a 737. So there is no issue in having low engines. Its just different class of aircraft all together.
How are those winglets installed?
What do cigars have to do with this?
Ah come on, when will you make one on the 747? Cool video though.
David 747-400 wants some 747-400)
Frank Galeon exactly
Everyone waits Boeing marathon)
I feel like there isn't an airliner around with more videos about it than the 747.
RumpelForeskin how about all the modern shit like the A350 and 787?
Will you do Fokker 70/100 next?
Not next but i'm planning to do it later
Great! I hence from the Netherlands so it is a little piece of national pride!
What if Boeing, Airbus, bombardier, and embrear all joined together to make the real plane of the future