I flew A380's until Covid hit. Now I'm flying King Air's. I truly miss the side stick. I spent my first 7,000 hours on conventional controls, and the following 14,000 hours on side sticks. I was a bit skeptical switching from DC10 to A330, to say the least, but it was a very positive experience for the most part. My general impression through life is that people love to have opinions. Often they're not based on actual experience or subject knowledge. One example is the truckloads of pilots who have told me that Airbus is absolute crap and they hate it. Half of them have never flown an Airbus, and the other half spent 15 years on Boeing's and half a year on Airbus before making up their minds. There's no perfect aircraft. I've flown Boeing, Douglas, Airbus, and a collection of turboprops. If you give me a flying job where I can choose an aircraft and with all things being equal I will always choose an Airbus. The side stick is one of the reasons. I haven't flown the 220 or any of the Bombardier regional/business jets, though I would love to have a go, but if I could choose I'd choose a model with a side stick.
Seeing you describe all these aircraft that you flew, and me being just a private pilot, gives me encouragement to experience something similar. To keep me fighting, because the flight hours only get more expensive. Could you give me some tips to start this path? I imagine it wasn't easy for you sir
@@Lipeboussada12345 If you want to be a professional pilot and don't have much money there's only one way: Determination. Get yourself to the 250hrs required for a CPL & CFI by asking friends and acquaintances if they want to take part in small flying adventures. Fly to nearby cities for exploration or just lunch at the airport greasy spoon. I lived in SoCal and would go on day trips to Northern or Central CA or to Las Vegas or Lake-this-n-that and "share" the flying cost. As a CFIIME I spent 7 days at the airport and befriended everybody. Always curious. Always helpful. Always eager to come along if anybody needed a safety pilot or just company. That built up to 85hrs per month, mostly paid hours, and many happy students who recommended me to others. At 1500hrs I got a job flying twins (Navajo Chieftain) between Burbank and Grand Canyon mostly, but also all over the Southwest. At 2500 I joined the airlines. At the Chieftain job I had 1 day off per week, but one time I worked 7 weeks in a row. I was happy as a lark. Of course it's not sustainable through your career, and also illegal once you're on the Airline track, but I'm a firm believer that if you have an actual goal, then you should probably work on it 7 days per week, be it on the clock or not. I have more than one airline friend who spend their days off in single engine propeller planes or on the model airplane field. So 7 days per week on something you love is a properly spent life in my book. Good luck. It's well worth the effort.
Sky, like everyone I very much enjoy your content. I did want to point out one thing that you missed that the Bombardier has an as an advantage. It's Landing here is set up to land on unimproved fields where the Gulf Stream is not. I still hate the side stick but oh well. I'm a stick and Rudder pilot.
I’m old school. I, too, prefer the yoke over the “video game controller.” But this jet and others coming out now are designed for the video game generation, so the side stick it is.
I've been watching you for a couple of years and I finally subscribed. This happens to be my favorite aircraft on the planet as far as business jet the Bombardier Global Express. Just saying the name gives me such satisfaction, thanks for the video what really made me go wild was the 8000 model with a top speed of Mach .094.
Huge fan of your work! Awesome videos! Way off topic but I’d sure love to see a series on De Havilland Canada products. Specifically the DHC-2 to -7. I’m sure you’d nail it!! Cheers
I’m not looking no further details being a Gulfstream guy for years but unfortunately the Global 7500 in which I got a tour in one and this one has it all the accommodations you can only ask for and it’s already equipped as living in and out of this tremendous the top of my list of personal and private luxury travel. I’m seeing more companies as of Netjets and others joining in on being the best
What's ironic is the C series was offered to some US airlines for as low as $20M - a fraction of the price of the corporate jet. This was when the US accused the Canadians of "price dumping", sanctioned Bombardier and forced the sale of the model to Airbus as the A220. But seriously - $20M?! If we pass the hat around the comments section we could probably raise that much! :D
I read that Delta's CS100 (now the A220-100) were offered at $22M, not $20M. Also they were "paper" derated with a lower maximum take off weight / lower range - to justify the initial lower price. It's understood that Delta later elected to pay extra $ to remove that "paper" derating.
Strange layout: forward toilet for crew. The rear toilet for passengers, but how will passengers use this rear toilet when they have to go through the bedroom where the Boss is sleeping?
What a sleek, beautiful, obscene ship. That cockpit is a work of art, must be thrilling to fly. Sad that these magnificent machines are mostly in the service of some of the worst people in the world for the most trivial selfish purposes. Not Niki Lauda though, he was still cool, RIP.
@18:35 the commercial aviation division has been completely divested. They sold the Q400/Dash-8 program to Longview Aviation Capital Corporation, parent of Viking Air which produces the CL-415 & CL-515 "Super Scooper". They also sold the De Havilland name, so LACC has setup a new De Havilland aircraft to produce the Q400/Dash-8. They sold the Canadair Regional Jet program to Mitsubishi. They sold the C-Series program to Airbus, now the A220.
In the last cabin where there is a couch that makes to a bed bombardiar should put a cushion head board on the wall so when the couch is put to a bed it actually looks like a bed and when in the mile high club you don’t bang your head …
Ha, the competition of the Gulfstream stream and the Bombardier will eventually lead to the fact that in 10 years we will see how their flagships become supersonic. Just the evolution of technology and competition
It will not happen in 10 years. It will take at least that long to develope a supersonic aircraft once it is announced. Bombardier does not have the money required to do a supersonic.
The mach 1 flight is, I think, more than just PR, and an important test. If you have a business jet that can go at a steady speed just short of Mach 1, then there could be circumstances in which it would attain or exceed that. From my understanding, the "trans sonic" portion is the hardest on the air frame (see instances of crashes in WW II with the faster piston engine fighters that lead to a lot of this research in the first place), and it's worth knowing that the air frame can handle the stress.
There are FAR regulations that require manufacturers to test their aircraft. In this case, they have max speed for Global 8000 to be mach .94, so they are required to test it to a speed greater than that. In this case they were required to test to greater than mach 1
@@brettrun8575 Yes it does. They're intending to discontinue the 7500 & replace it with the 8000, because the two are identical aside from the fact that the 8000 is faster & longer range, so there's literally no reason to keep making/selling the inferior product. It'll just cost the company more money in tooling/production to make two products vs making just one. Plus, the current 7500 owners can take their jets to Bombardier & have them retrofitted to become 8000's, instead of having to buy brand new 8000's.
Many thanks for reintroducing the thrust in lbs. 1st sponsored video? What happened to Smokey's Lounge? It's the standard Skyships background music, it seemed unusual to watch without it in the background.
@@TRPGpilot Oi! What altitude do you fly at? I've said to Skyships repeatedly that I can do metric conversions in my head to anything other than thrust values, Skyships is a very obliging gentleman. BTW, not only altitude, what speed do you fly at or range can your plane cover? All are Imperial units.
@@COIcultist Not all miles are imperial! Nautical miles, and the unit of speed derived from them, knots, have nothing to do with imerial units. They are much older, and still very common in aviation and nautical applications.
@@Colaholiker The concept of the Nautical Mile was old, but a value was probably first given to it by Robert Hues, The 1929 conference to define the Nautical Mile wasn't ratified by the US and Britain. The UK does now define the Nautical Mile in metric terms, and it is about 7 and a quarter inches shorter than the Imperial Nautical Mile. Mind you, the metric definition was changed from 1,852 metres to 1,853 metres. Practically, I'm not too bothered about 7 and a quarter inch.
Incredible aircraft, video, and information. Great job as always. The pity is the number of people who will use, travel in and fly it can be counted on the fingers of just a few. We mortal souls will never get into anything resembling this. Then the question is....so what? Why bother...?
900m cabin pressure is a really big deal for reducing jet lag. I do wonder about the larger windows though. There are a lot more damaging UV rays at altitude and if they haven't treated the windows accordingly, passengers and crew will definitely need to wear some sunscreen.
Both Gulfstream and bombadier kip pushing eachother in the elite private jet sector to the amazement and appreciation of its loyal customer base who are spoilt for choice..😃✌️
Taking an aircraft supersonic in a steep nosedive and posting a high max speed limit on paper mean nothing in terms of real world cruise speed and efficiency. The Global flies much slower in cruise and is much less efficient at high speed when compared to Gulfstream.
Si las personas no pueden salir a sus vacaciones es porque hay que limpiar la casa y el barrio, el distrito no vas a dejar un vigilante cuidando un centenar de rateros y criminales, igual uno que les cuida o los va a cambiar
Работал я там несколько лет на этом проекте, барахло этот самолет полное. Фантик с снаружи красивый а без ремонта и замены после каждого полета он просто рухнет как топор. На него MRB запросы пошли еще задолго до начала производства, трещины, неправильная клёпка, брак и тд. Низкооплачиваемые работяги в ботах прямо по тонким бракетам ходили, гнули всё беспощадно еще на этапе сборки. И кто его там " разрабатывал", нагнали сотни мароканцев, индусов и другой сброд под руководством кучки местных лицензионных инженеров без знаний и опыта, ибо местное образование это днищще. Натырили технологий из британских и штатовских компаний и сотворили дикий венегрет из документации. А уж эти глянцевые картинки, это вообще бред, я лично наблюдал мышей в офисе и столовой главного их завода в центре Монреаля. Всё настолько старое и занюханное, что любой совдеповский НИИ фору даст. Любите вы всё иностранное воспевать а своё унижать. А в реальности у нас на предприятии в конце 80х всё было во сто крат круче поставлено по части производства, чем сейчас на этой шараге по отмывке бюджетного бабла. Своё развивайте. И всё получится.
El señor que barre, la señora que hace los uniformes, el representante que vende el champú del avión, la señora de la salida del airport, la señora de las maletas, el dueño de los tornillos, etcétera. El que teje las corbatas y el hielo del jugo. Y las papas fritas . Y que si vas y me compras un borrador.
Why do such small aircraft have so many windows? Its almost as if they saw the plans for larger aircraft and simply shrunk everything without thinking if less and maybe slightly larger windows would be better. If not as if there's a row by each one (many such jets have few if any formal rows).
"... flaunts a huge TV with advanced multimedia and sound" 😂 ... shows 32" LCD with what seems like a DVD placed lazily in front of the windows. Worth $60m for sure lol, what a joke. Be honest, you made this video from the sales brochure didn't you?
@@whiteandnerdytuba > I am just saying the 8000 is NOT in production yet and no one owns one yet. YES, it will be an improvement on the 7500. Your statement makes the assumption it is already the best. HOW CAN THAT BE IF IT DOES NOT EXIST YET?
These aircraft supply 100s of thousands of good paying jobs all over the world. From manufacturing to service to parts. If they go away, there will be many more starving. So take your pick.
@@endimious > I don't think I did. Your insinuation is somehow if the rich didn't buy jets there would be more money for the poor and starving. Some people just can't be helped no matter how much money you throw at them. These jets supply 1000s and 1000s of good paying jobs. If that is not the point, then exactly what is your point.
I've often wondered about that. But I'm left hand so a lot times I have to navigate a world designed for right handed people (numberpad on your keyboard anyone?). The other thing is I travel and drive cars in countries that are both left and right hand drive. Even when driving a manual transmission, I find the switch isn't that hard.
Even with a yoke you usually use only your left hand to use it, as the right hand is either on thrust levers or operating knobs and dials. Unless you fly a jet fighter.
Such poor taste for the ultra wealthy to be flying around in these things when most of the world is struggling. I admire the engineering, I despise the culture and customers who buy these things. Adding this much greenhouse gases on top of your poor taste is the icing on the cake of tone deafness.
What most people seem to not realize is that, there are 100s of thousands of good paying jobs because of these jets. There will be more poor people if they go away.
@@rcairflr The pilots who fly these are not poor people. They're generally the highest paid pilots in the industry. Pilots can always find a job as we've seen lately with the pilot shortage.
Dankon pro ĉio, kion vi prezentis, mi esperas, ke vi kaj ĉiuj viaj amikoj, parencoj kaj familio, kie ajn vi estas, ke la Ĉiopova ĉiam donu Sian gracon al ni ĉiuj. Pasis iom da tempo de kiam mi vidis aviadilojn kaj grandajn kaj malgrandajn formojn, sed mi neniam vidis sekurecan septon kiam la sistemo subite funkcias, kio estas uzata por eviti ke la aviadilo estu detruita kiam ĝi falas.Ne estas maniero, ke Aviadilaj fakuloj ne povas krei tian aferon, se mi pensas stulte kaj ridinde, se ni starigus ĝin kiel paraŝutadon je kvar punktoj, ĝi ne estus tro detruita.detruita aŭ almenaŭ malhelpita eksplodo ️🛫🛬
I find it astonishing that you like everyone doing review of this and other planes have seldom mention Sleeping arrangements guest lavatory essential to sustain a 10 hours flight!?? Always show settings, lounge, room shower, speed and passenger capacity! Q owner sleeping in his private room, 11 guest travelling flying 10 hours.. Where do they sleep? Where is their rest room? The crew have theirs! While 11 guests and owner Look mostly to share owner single bath room? Than it's a public bed room??... As only way to the bathroom is via this room? Trust you have been on 10hours flight and experienced lines to go toilet etc.. I have yet to hear any of these plane tours ever speak of guest comfort on a 10 hours flight!! Good you be the first!!
The interior for a sales demo unit is kept generic to get people thinking about how they'll customize it to their own requirements. The configuration you describe is almost an intentionally bad troll move for the sales department. At this cost, no one takes a default interior configuration.
Get 4 months for free on a 2-year plan here nordvpn.com/nordsky
It’s risk-free with Nord’s 30-day money-back guarantee! ✌
Finally a video that matches its visual with the narration, with little flaws👍
Mach 0.925 is 1130 km/h (708 mph)
I flew A380's until Covid hit. Now I'm flying King Air's. I truly miss the side stick. I spent my first 7,000 hours on conventional controls, and the following 14,000 hours on side sticks. I was a bit skeptical switching from DC10 to A330, to say the least, but it was a very positive experience for the most part. My general impression through life is that people love to have opinions. Often they're not based on actual experience or subject knowledge. One example is the truckloads of pilots who have told me that Airbus is absolute crap and they hate it. Half of them have never flown an Airbus, and the other half spent 15 years on Boeing's and half a year on Airbus before making up their minds. There's no perfect aircraft. I've flown Boeing, Douglas, Airbus, and a collection of turboprops. If you give me a flying job where I can choose an aircraft and with all things being equal I will always choose an Airbus. The side stick is one of the reasons. I haven't flown the 220 or any of the Bombardier regional/business jets, though I would love to have a go, but if I could choose I'd choose a model with a side stick.
Seeing you describe all these aircraft that you flew, and me being just a private pilot, gives me encouragement to experience something similar. To keep me fighting, because the flight hours only get more expensive. Could you give me some tips to start this path? I imagine it wasn't easy for you sir
@@Lipeboussada12345 If you want to be a professional pilot and don't have much money there's only one way: Determination. Get yourself to the 250hrs required for a CPL & CFI by asking friends and acquaintances if they want to take part in small flying adventures. Fly to nearby cities for exploration or just lunch at the airport greasy spoon. I lived in SoCal and would go on day trips to Northern or Central CA or to Las Vegas or Lake-this-n-that and "share" the flying cost. As a CFIIME I spent 7 days at the airport and befriended everybody. Always curious. Always helpful. Always eager to come along if anybody needed a safety pilot or just company. That built up to 85hrs per month, mostly paid hours, and many happy students who recommended me to others. At 1500hrs I got a job flying twins (Navajo Chieftain) between Burbank and Grand Canyon mostly, but also all over the Southwest. At 2500 I joined the airlines. At the Chieftain job I had 1 day off per week, but one time I worked 7 weeks in a row. I was happy as a lark. Of course it's not sustainable through your career, and also illegal once you're on the Airline track, but I'm a firm believer that if you have an actual goal, then you should probably work on it 7 days per week, be it on the clock or not. I have more than one airline friend who spend their days off in single engine propeller planes or on the model airplane field. So 7 days per week on something you love is a properly spent life in my book. Good luck. It's well worth the effort.
Thank you for uploading! This aircraft is indeed incredible 😍
I love how you get into the details. Thanks.
Oh, how'd I miss a Skyships upload, man? These are always a bright spot in any day a new one comes out.
Why are comments like this all over RUclips?
Sky, like everyone I very much enjoy your content. I did want to point out one thing that you missed that the Bombardier has an as an advantage. It's Landing here is set up to land on unimproved fields where the Gulf Stream is not. I still hate the side stick but oh well. I'm a stick and Rudder pilot.
Call it out!
some pilots love the side stick because it means they can have their lunch on their lap!
@@octagonPerfectionist that's really funny. Do you fly side stick? I fly a center stick, a kitfox.
I’m old school. I, too, prefer the yoke over the “video game controller.” But this jet and others coming out now are designed for the video game generation, so the side stick it is.
New Gulfstreams have a side stick as well.
I've been watching you for a couple of years and I finally subscribed. This happens to be my favorite aircraft on the planet as far as business jet the Bombardier Global Express. Just saying the name gives me such satisfaction, thanks for the video what really made me go wild was the 8000 model with a top speed of Mach .094.
Huge fan of your work! Awesome videos! Way off topic but I’d sure love to see a series on De Havilland Canada products. Specifically the DHC-2 to -7. I’m sure you’d nail it!! Cheers
Finally, a private jet video that actually educated me! Really appreciate that, thank you! 👍
Sky told about such a “supersonic” test made by the Dougla DC-8
Yes, they've done it in 1960's
I’m not looking no further details being a Gulfstream guy for years but unfortunately the Global 7500 in which I got a tour in one and this one has it all the accommodations you can only ask for and it’s already equipped as living in and out of this tremendous the top of my list of personal and private luxury travel. I’m seeing more companies as of Netjets and others joining in on being the best
Amazing product, waiting to see it reaching Mach 1 soon...
A very beautiful airplane, and a hefty price tag. It has the range also to cross the pond. Must have a sparkling interior.
Yeah the big pound and the equator.
What's ironic is the C series was offered to some US airlines for as low as $20M - a fraction of the price of the corporate jet. This was when the US accused the Canadians of "price dumping", sanctioned Bombardier and forced the sale of the model to Airbus as the A220.
But seriously - $20M?! If we pass the hat around the comments section we could probably raise that much! :D
I read that Delta's CS100 (now the A220-100) were offered at $22M, not $20M.
Also they were "paper" derated with a lower maximum take off weight / lower range - to justify the initial lower price.
It's understood that Delta later elected to pay extra $ to remove that "paper" derating.
@@erictremblay4940 Ahh what's a couple of mil between friends.
And how much was the max8 offered at?
Strange layout: forward toilet for crew. The rear toilet for passengers, but how will passengers use this rear toilet when they have to go through the bedroom where the Boss is sleeping?
Forward toilet is both for crew and guests
What a sleek, beautiful, obscene ship. That cockpit is a work of art, must be thrilling to fly. Sad that these magnificent machines are mostly in the service of some of the worst people in the world for the most trivial selfish purposes. Not Niki Lauda though, he was still cool, RIP.
I’ve watched several of your videos and they are all excellent!
Hello from Toronto,Canada
@18:35 the commercial aviation division has been completely divested.
They sold the Q400/Dash-8 program to Longview Aviation Capital Corporation, parent of Viking Air which produces the CL-415 & CL-515 "Super Scooper". They also sold the De Havilland name, so LACC has setup a new De Havilland aircraft to produce the Q400/Dash-8.
They sold the Canadair Regional Jet program to Mitsubishi.
They sold the C-Series program to Airbus, now the A220.
In the last cabin where there is a couch that makes to a bed bombardiar should put a cushion head board on the wall so when the couch is put to a bed it actually looks like a bed and when in the mile high club you don’t bang your head …
Ha, the competition of the Gulfstream stream and the Bombardier will eventually lead to the fact that in 10 years we will see how their flagships become supersonic. Just the evolution of technology and competition
It will not happen in 10 years. It will take at least that long to develope a supersonic aircraft once it is announced. Bombardier does not have the money required to do a supersonic.
Great video, love the Global, but my full heart STILL belong to Gulfstream!🤷🏿♂😉😎
Great Video. I'd love to see on one the Beechcraft 1900
you sold me Sky, I'm gonna get me one! I'm sure there must be a stash of 75 million lying around here somewhere...
Dassault will be introducing their 10X around the same time as the 8000 enters service.
Did y'all spot a fun detail: legendary actor Bruce Willis is in the audience at one of the initial presentations @13:58!😎
9:48 A "Kitchen" in an aircraft or ship is called a "Galley" (gal-e).
The mach 1 flight is, I think, more than just PR, and an important test. If you have a business jet that can go at a steady speed just short of Mach 1, then there could be circumstances in which it would attain or exceed that. From my understanding, the "trans sonic" portion is the hardest on the air frame (see instances of crashes in WW II with the faster piston engine fighters that lead to a lot of this research in the first place), and it's worth knowing that the air frame can handle the stress.
There are FAR regulations that require manufacturers to test their aircraft. In this case, they have max speed for Global 8000 to be mach .94, so they are required to test it to a speed greater than that. In this case they were required to test to greater than mach 1
If you'll allow me to nitpick one thing that is very noticeable to Americans: Tucson is pronounced with an emphasis on the first syllable. Too-sahn.
The best indeed! Thanks for uploading!
Upgrade program for Global 7500 into Global 8000 will be a big bargain for the customers
GL8000 does not exist.
@@brettrun8575 Yes it does. They're intending to discontinue the 7500 & replace it with the 8000, because the two are identical aside from the fact that the 8000 is faster & longer range, so there's literally no reason to keep making/selling the inferior product. It'll just cost the company more money in tooling/production to make two products vs making just one.
Plus, the current 7500 owners can take their jets to Bombardier & have them retrofitted to become 8000's, instead of having to buy brand new 8000's.
Wow just 6 of these babies pays for Bombardier's new $400 million plus dollar manufacturing plant in Toronto.
What is cheaper to operate? The ACJ TwoTwenty or this 7500?
I'd say bombardier is more like a megalodon shark. They're not going to give up!
Many thanks for reintroducing the thrust in lbs.
1st sponsored video?
What happened to Smokey's Lounge? It's the standard Skyships background music, it seemed unusual to watch without it in the background.
That's a retrogressive step. The world understand metric, not obsolete units hardly used by anyone . . .
@@TRPGpilot Oi! What altitude do you fly at?
I've said to Skyships repeatedly that I can do metric conversions in my head to anything other than thrust values, Skyships is a very obliging gentleman. BTW, not only altitude, what speed do you fly at or range can your plane cover? All are Imperial units.
@@COIcultist Not all miles are imperial! Nautical miles, and the unit of speed derived from them, knots, have nothing to do with imerial units. They are much older, and still very common in aviation and nautical applications.
@@Colaholiker The concept of the Nautical Mile was old, but a value was probably first given to it by Robert Hues, The 1929 conference to define the Nautical Mile wasn't ratified by the US and Britain. The UK does now define the Nautical Mile in metric terms, and it is about 7 and a quarter inches shorter than the Imperial Nautical Mile. Mind you, the metric definition was changed from 1,852 metres to 1,853 metres. Practically, I'm not too bothered about 7 and a quarter inch.
Love it, please send me a couple of those 😂
Look at that massive fuel tank bulge below the fuselage that's the secret to its distance.
No it is not. All you see is composite fairing. The fuel tank is integral to the center fuselage and of course the wings.
Incredible aircraft, video, and information. Great job as always. The pity is the number of people who will use, travel in and fly it can be counted on the fingers of just a few. We mortal souls will never get into anything resembling this. Then the question is....so what? Why bother...?
Another great video well done.
The real matatan jets.🤔. Ribirin.
The real matatan.🤔.
Needless to say, I want one. In fact I need one living in Denver with an apartment in Singapore. Have just been waiting for the range increase...
900m cabin pressure is a really big deal for reducing jet lag. I do wonder about the larger windows though. There are a lot more damaging UV rays at altitude and if they haven't treated the windows accordingly, passengers and crew will definitely need to wear some sunscreen.
any plastic blocks UV''s, and this is the reason plastics wither when exposed to the sun for a long time, they de-polymerise
They sold the cs300 to Airbus and Q400 and crj production to Mitsubishi, I am surprise bombardier is still an aerospace company
They still have all the business jets and service centers. Globals and Challengers. They also retained Learjets but they shuit that line down recently
Nice aircraft but still like the Gulfstream especially the G700
I love this plane
Magnificent aircraft love it
Pity Learjet is gone now so this new business jet has taken over.
Nice business jet.
Learjet was owned by Bombardier
When are you going all electric?
1,88 m cabin height?? 😢 Not for tall people...
Thx for the video!
Great video
Is that going to be John Kerry‘s next airplane
Excellent video Sky.
You should look at the Citation 10 if you can... as I understand it may actually be faster then the Bombardier.
Also... already a nord vpn user.
So you’re saying, there is a chance…
Beautiful
Both Gulfstream and bombadier kip pushing eachother in the elite private jet sector to the amazement and appreciation of its loyal customer base who are spoilt for choice..😃✌️
Should have named it Globo Homo.
I would prefer customised.
Taking an aircraft supersonic in a steep nosedive and posting a high max speed limit on paper mean nothing in terms of real world cruise speed and efficiency. The Global flies much slower in cruise and is much less efficient at high speed when compared to Gulfstream.
This thing is sick. If I was every rich enough one day I would rent this with VistaJet and take me to a exotic location around the world on vacation.
Si las personas no pueden salir a sus vacaciones es porque hay que limpiar la casa y el barrio, el distrito no vas a dejar un vigilante cuidando un centenar de rateros y criminales, igual uno que les cuida o los va a cambiar
I asked them if they'd swap out the cadenza for a fireplace but no such luck. I'm returning my deposit.
Very informative video. Funny how you sound like a 60 year old, though obviously you are much younger.
So, it's another Lockheed design, then?
How is this a Lockheed design?
Vive Le Canada
Reliability wise gulfstreams are better
Работал я там несколько лет на этом проекте, барахло этот самолет полное. Фантик с снаружи красивый а без ремонта и замены после каждого полета он просто рухнет как топор. На него MRB запросы пошли еще задолго до начала производства, трещины, неправильная клёпка, брак и тд. Низкооплачиваемые работяги в ботах прямо по тонким бракетам ходили, гнули всё беспощадно еще на этапе сборки. И кто его там " разрабатывал", нагнали сотни мароканцев, индусов и другой сброд под руководством кучки местных лицензионных инженеров без знаний и опыта, ибо местное образование это днищще. Натырили технологий из британских и штатовских компаний и сотворили дикий венегрет из документации. А уж эти глянцевые картинки, это вообще бред, я лично наблюдал мышей в офисе и столовой главного их завода в центре Монреаля. Всё настолько старое и занюханное, что любой совдеповский НИИ фору даст. Любите вы всё иностранное воспевать а своё унижать. А в реальности у нас на предприятии в конце 80х всё было во сто крат круче поставлено по части производства, чем сейчас на этой шараге по отмывке бюджетного бабла. Своё развивайте. И всё получится.
I prefer Gulfstream. I dont like Bombardiers cabins. Gulfstream, Embraer and Falcons interior are beautiful.
El señor que barre, la señora que hace los uniformes, el representante que vende el champú del avión, la señora de la salida del airport, la señora de las maletas, el dueño de los tornillos, etcétera. El que teje las corbatas y el hielo del jugo. Y las papas fritas . Y que si vas y me compras un borrador.
Léase wuote one 7500
Makes you proud to be a Canadian just wonder what would have happened to the company with proper funding
Proud to be a Québécois, indeed.
☝
fly donkey 2 ear 2 stamock
Why do such small aircraft have so many windows?
Its almost as if they saw the plans for larger aircraft and simply shrunk everything without thinking if less and maybe slightly larger windows would be better. If not as if there's a row by each one (many such jets have few if any formal rows).
Think about your question for a minute. Do you want a large hole in your pressure vessel?
Larger windows are difficult to keep safe in flight at low external pressure and they create decompression event risks to passengers.
Still flying with Pratt and Whitney engines? Gulfstream went back to Rolls Royce.
No the engines are GE Passport 20
@@pilotnico Same difference
And... ?
Probably still a bolt on option.
@@CaptHollister I dont understand your gibberish
"... a bit supersoic" ! What does that even mean? THUMBS DOWN
Gulfstream...
Lovely❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤😍
"... flaunts a huge TV with advanced multimedia and sound" 😂
... shows 32" LCD with what seems like a DVD placed lazily in front of the windows.
Worth $60m for sure lol, what a joke.
Be honest, you made this video from the sales brochure didn't you?
Isn’t this already surpassed by the 8000, so it’s already not the best
The 8000 is not in production yet. It will replace the 7500. The 8000 is just a 7500 with a few improvements
@@rcairflr so you're saying the 8000 is the best
@@whiteandnerdytuba > I am just saying the 8000 is NOT in production yet and no one owns one yet. YES, it will be an improvement on the 7500. Your statement makes the assumption it is already the best. HOW CAN THAT BE IF IT DOES NOT EXIST YET?
@@rcairflr because customers with a 7500 on order were offered the 8000 as an upgrade
7500.globol g.550.keys.g.550.keys.
Hah...I've spotted a design flaw......a window in the lavatory. Everyone outside will be looking in when the pax are doing their business........ffs!
That's why it is called a *business* jet. 😆
Totally Climate Friendly also I'm Sure...does it come in the electric model ? Didn't f***ing think so
Gulfstream is better than this lol
wow so cool in a world where 15 000 children die of starvation a day
These aircraft supply 100s of thousands of good paying jobs all over the world. From manufacturing to service to parts. If they go away, there will be many more starving. So take your pick.
@@rcairflr you missed the point completelly
@@endimious > I don't think I did. Your insinuation is somehow if the rich didn't buy jets there would be more money for the poor and starving. Some people just can't be helped no matter how much money you throw at them. These jets supply 1000s and 1000s of good paying jobs.
If that is not the point, then exactly what is your point.
Gotta be off off-putting using a side side-stick in your indominant hand
I've often wondered about that. But I'm left hand so a lot times I have to navigate a world designed for right handed people (numberpad on your keyboard anyone?). The other thing is I travel and drive cars in countries that are both left and right hand drive. Even when driving a manual transmission, I find the switch isn't that hard.
Even with a yoke you usually use only your left hand to use it, as the right hand is either on thrust levers or operating knobs and dials.
Unless you fly a jet fighter.
Such poor taste for the ultra wealthy to be flying around in these things when most of the world is struggling. I admire the engineering, I despise the culture and customers who buy these things. Adding this much greenhouse gases on top of your poor taste is the icing on the cake of tone deafness.
What most people seem to not realize is that, there are 100s of thousands of good paying jobs because of these jets. There will be more poor people if they go away.
@@rcairflr The pilots who fly these are not poor people. They're generally the highest paid pilots in the industry. Pilots can always find a job as we've seen lately with the pilot shortage.
@@ejkk9513 > You completely missed my point. Read your post again and then read mine again. If you need an explanation, let me know
As always nice video, would it be possible though to get someone without speech impediment?
Dankon pro ĉio, kion vi prezentis, mi esperas, ke vi kaj ĉiuj viaj amikoj, parencoj kaj familio, kie ajn vi estas, ke la Ĉiopova ĉiam donu Sian gracon al ni ĉiuj. Pasis iom da tempo de kiam mi vidis aviadilojn kaj grandajn kaj malgrandajn formojn, sed mi neniam vidis sekurecan septon kiam la sistemo subite funkcias, kio estas uzata por eviti ke la aviadilo estu detruita kiam ĝi falas.Ne estas maniero, ke Aviadilaj fakuloj ne povas krei tian aferon, se mi pensas stulte kaj ridinde, se ni starigus ĝin kiel paraŝutadon je kvar punktoj, ĝi ne estus tro detruita.detruita aŭ almenaŭ malhelpita eksplodo ️🛫🛬
I find it astonishing that you like everyone doing review of this and other planes have seldom mention Sleeping arrangements guest lavatory essential to sustain a 10 hours flight!?? Always show settings, lounge, room shower, speed and passenger capacity!
Q
owner sleeping in his private room, 11 guest travelling flying 10 hours.. Where do they sleep? Where is their rest room? The crew have theirs! While 11 guests and owner Look mostly to share owner single bath room? Than it's a public bed room??... As only way to the bathroom is via this room? Trust you have been on 10hours flight and experienced lines to go toilet etc.. I have yet to hear any of these plane tours ever speak of guest comfort on a 10 hours flight!! Good you be the first!!
The interior for a sales demo unit is kept generic to get people thinking about how they'll customize it to their own requirements. The configuration you describe is almost an intentionally bad troll move for the sales department. At this cost, no one takes a default interior configuration.
All Jets,worldwide. 1,600.keys please.
❤️❤️✋😊