@jitteryjared5338 no because prenups are toilet paper. Rarely enforced to the terms and calling cost 100k plus to get the judge to ACTUALLY ENFORCE it. The marriage rate is the lowest in history because of these laws. Remember the judge and lawyers get a cut with every die-vorce, and every alimony/child support payment
@@bobbob-zc1nx not gonna lie you calling at a die-vorce makes you sound unhinged. I dont really know anything about this stuff but you seem quite biased. From what I just googled seems that to litigate a prenup both sides have to lawyer up and it costs a lot of money, but thats only if it actually goes to litigation. Most people either accept terms or cut a deal to avoid all the time and money going to litigation.
@@jitteryjared5338 I called it die-vorce because it's the death of a marriage of a family. Yes, you just confirmed what I said, it costs alot to get it enforced. The judge can and will look at your agreement and decide if they agree with it. Judges mark up and throw out prenups all the time. If you want to enforce it, you need to lawyer up. Most of the time it will be challenged because most break ups aren't easy, calm, nor amicable. There's also a ton of money and your other assets on the line. Like I said the judge and lawyers get paid to go to court, and get a cut of every alimony and child support payment. So they tend to push couples to go to court, especially if there's significant assets on the line.
Somehow, every Dizzy and Sakana rrat ended up being some form of “they’re family”, be them siblings, in laws, married, the one thing we can all agree on is “they see each other at family reunions”
@@San-nj8fj i think its because dizzy mentioned that one of her family members (either her nephew or cousin) dressed up as Sakana for Halloween, which suggests that her family has met him and following what he does.
I feel like a U.S. green card would solve a fair number of her problems. Especially since no man who wants her would go to Canada, except to conquer it.
People nowadays get it backwards. Back then, when arranged marriages are common, people fall in love with their husband/wife AFTER they get married. The courting process was basically intel-gathering stage to see whether your potential partner would be compatible with you.
The explanation I get from Indians is that they need time to focus on their studies so their parent find partners for them. Not sure how well that one sits with me, but they seem into the idea so I can’t really judge.
That's the romanticized version, in practice you just 'fell in love' with the person your family pressured you into picking because, especially if you were a woman, you didn't really have a practical option to separate and had to change yourself to accommodate it. The modern version is a lot closer to the romanticized version, since it's a lot more common to allow for a year or so of dating to get to know the potential partner, and the stigma surrounding separation is not as big.
@@dotnet97 That's incorrect. The dating period is the honeymoon period, where both the man and woman put up the best act they possibly can to ensnare their partner. It's really a scam. The courting process involves both the families of the man and the woman over a long period of time, which greatly reduces the chance of them putting on an act. And less stigma on separation is not a good thing, as you can see with how many broken families in the West. This is what happens when people focus on individuality to the extreme. There's simply no reason to form a group anymore, including family.
@@dotnet97 But that's exactly how love works. It's a commitment you have to make, not some hormones you have because you like the pretty doe eyes or the big boobs of whoever you're looking at at that time.
@@Arcessitor would you describe someone forced to stockholm syndrome themselves into living with someone as love? I wouldn't, yet that's exactly what arranged marriage has been for most of history. The modern ideal of two people making a decision to form a family and willingly compromising and learning to live with each other, despite being fully able to leave at any point, is far more romantic. Yes, it allows for a lot more divorces than otherwise and especially here in the US we have a lot of spoiled brats who pop out children endlessly and don't know how to compromise, but you have to be exceptionally narrow minded to think a low divorce rate means more happy families, when really all it does is make people hide the broken-ness of the home from the rest of the world. The options aren't just "love is carnal attraction" and "love is settling with circumstances you aren't allowed to change", there's plenty of room in between for what love actually is.
If you live in a culture where male and female roles in marriage are well laid out and accepted, with the addition of divorce being heavily scrutinized, then an arranged marriage makes a lot of sense. I believe it was CS Lewis who said something to the effect that your true love, as a concept, develops into the person that you marry. But I think it included the idea that both fully commit to the relationship.
Strangely, if you look at statistics as a whole, arranged marriages are more successful and happier than the regular marriages. Dizzy does have her experiences with bad ones. But, in general, it seems removing the courting aspects leads to people just getting to know each other and communicating and working out problems like an adult, instead of just dumping the relationship. I do disagree with the practice just under freedom of choice and association principles. But those are the results.
It may simply have a lot more to do with the consequences. Look up what happens when a bride runs away from an arranged marriage in India, for example. It's pretty brutal.
Yeah Indians love to brag about these statistics, but a statistic is just one part of it. Just look at the difference between what a Brazilian would call a pizza and what an Italian would call a pizza... And then realize in what kind of culture arranged marriages flourish.
Cope. The global average divorce rate of "love marriages" is 40% while in arranged marriages is only 4%. 70% of divorces in the US are due to infidelity.
@@MASJYT Yeah, because in a lot of the countries where arranged marriage is common, it's also considered a requirement to off your daughter if she runs away from the arranged marriage, otherwise your entire family loses honour. I'm sure if the consequence for divorce in a love marriage was immolation the rate would be lower too.
@@MASJYT correct me if im wrong , but most of cultures that do aranged marriage usually don't have a option of divorce(or is heavy stigmatized). So that could accout for most of that difference.
Ironically the older i get the more value i see in it. I dont know nobody who got married who slept around and was happy, also i seriously doubt Dizzys take, her third hand stories from her Chinese friends of a friend of a friend are probably not real. Shes an american/canadian, nobody there is getting arrange married, not even the asian "minority" that by this point is in millions. Dizzy always has an excuse why shes single and avoiding men, most of them pretty weird, all to avoid confronting that her far left feminist ideology is designed to keep her single and miserable.
Arrange marriages still exist, but aren't """forced""" like your parents saying "s/he is really cute and we know their parents so why not go on a date, but we are not forcing you *wink**wink*"
@@rafresendenrafresenden.1644 You ever hear of such situation? I didnt. It reeks of urban myth shit. The sad reality is nobody today is getting married, over 50% of people are single, all those stories are fake or 50 + years old. Not to be a doxer, but i saw dizzy, she a really pretty girl in her late 20ties, yet here she is, single, paying off a debt after her sister, juggling vtubing and her day job, while saying she wants kids but hates her married family. So instead she plays babysitter for retards like us online to make money. I just feel all those stories(like the one dizzy tells) are some fantasy, people used to be happier and we keep rewriting history in hopes it makes us feel better,
Nah it's still giga fucked up. Just because the West went full 180 polar opposite extreme hypergamy to the max mode doesn't mean the old one is ok. See the ones where a literal 12-13 year old(or 9 specifically, i'm just avoiding to mention a certain religion) arranged marriage to an old man and only needs a dowry then has free access to do whatever he wants. The more ideal ones are conservative-like places where there is still courting, and parents still have a say, but not completely able to stonewall. The Amish unironically got it right, as with many things they got it right again. Makes me appreciate Philippines' courting(in PH language: ligaw) style in hindsight.
![Dizzy's fujo brain at the garden center | #phaseclips | [Phase Connect]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/icXI5uo-6FQ/mqdefault.jpg)
![Dizzy's fujo brain at the garden center | #phaseclips | [Phase Connect]](/img/tr.png)
![Dizzy teaches you how to compliment | #phaseclips | [Phase Connect]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/NO5PK1vrvCo/mqdefault.jpg)
She was into it, when she was still a young princess... Hags cant be married to secure an alliance with prussia.
That feel when you can't access the discipline boys.
@@RambleOn07 I have taken quantity ideas, I require no discipline.
@@billygoatgruff3536 imagine your quantity with quality allies lol
@@RambleOn07 My Russia allied to your Brandenburg xD
Arranged marriages are practical if you’re rich and want to stay that way.
cant you just sign a prenup in a normal marriage though?
@@jitteryjared5338Prenups are toilet paper on courts
@jitteryjared5338 no because prenups are toilet paper.
Rarely enforced to the terms and calling cost 100k plus to get the judge to ACTUALLY ENFORCE it.
The marriage rate is the lowest in history because of these laws.
Remember the judge and lawyers get a cut with every die-vorce, and every alimony/child support payment
@@bobbob-zc1nx not gonna lie you calling at a die-vorce makes you sound unhinged. I dont really know anything about this stuff but you seem quite biased. From what I just googled seems that to litigate a prenup both sides have to lawyer up and it costs a lot of money, but thats only if it actually goes to litigation. Most people either accept terms or cut a deal to avoid all the time and money going to litigation.
@@jitteryjared5338 I called it die-vorce because it's the death of a marriage of a family.
Yes, you just confirmed what I said, it costs alot to get it enforced.
The judge can and will look at your agreement and decide if they agree with it.
Judges mark up and throw out prenups all the time.
If you want to enforce it, you need to lawyer up.
Most of the time it will be challenged because most break ups aren't easy, calm, nor amicable.
There's also a ton of money and your other assets on the line.
Like I said the judge and lawyers get paid to go to court, and get a cut of every alimony and child support payment.
So they tend to push couples to go to court, especially if there's significant assets on the line.
Dizzy: I bet he's thinking about other women.
Him: I wonder which dinosaur would be the easiest to domesticate?
Dizzy would be the easiest dinosaur to domesticate
Hagasaurus Dizzinous
Her brother is a successful coffee merchant, he could arrange a great match for her if she asked.
This is just excuse #42
Sakana?
Too true, he also devalues her at every opportunity. It's almost like he doesn't want to marry her off.
Somehow, every Dizzy and Sakana rrat ended up being some form of “they’re family”, be them siblings, in laws, married, the one thing we can all agree on is “they see each other at family reunions”
@@San-nj8fj i think its because dizzy mentioned that one of her family members (either her nephew or cousin) dressed up as Sakana for Halloween, which suggests that her family has met him and following what he does.
Can confirm, lots of weird boards and threads existed on Gaia 20+ years ago.
I did a Google search and I was surprised to find that it was still there.
Two chickens AND a cow? He should grab it, there's no way someone else is going to make a better offer for her than that.
Before watching this, I figured this was some empty carton coping.
And I wasn't wrong.
I feel like a U.S. green card would solve a fair number of her problems.
Especially since no man who wants her would go to Canada, except to conquer it.
Arranged is (in my opinion) a one way ticket to possibly getting deleted or being the deleter.
People nowadays get it backwards.
Back then, when arranged marriages are common, people fall in love with their husband/wife AFTER they get married. The courting process was basically intel-gathering stage to see whether your potential partner would be compatible with you.
The explanation I get from Indians is that they need time to focus on their studies so their parent find partners for them. Not sure how well that one sits with me, but they seem into the idea so I can’t really judge.
That's the romanticized version, in practice you just 'fell in love' with the person your family pressured you into picking because, especially if you were a woman, you didn't really have a practical option to separate and had to change yourself to accommodate it. The modern version is a lot closer to the romanticized version, since it's a lot more common to allow for a year or so of dating to get to know the potential partner, and the stigma surrounding separation is not as big.
@@dotnet97
That's incorrect. The dating period is the honeymoon period, where both the man and woman put up the best act they possibly can to ensnare their partner.
It's really a scam. The courting process involves both the families of the man and the woman over a long period of time, which greatly reduces the chance of them putting on an act. And less stigma on separation is not a good thing, as you can see with how many broken families in the West.
This is what happens when people focus on individuality to the extreme. There's simply no reason to form a group anymore, including family.
@@dotnet97 But that's exactly how love works. It's a commitment you have to make, not some hormones you have because you like the pretty doe eyes or the big boobs of whoever you're looking at at that time.
@@Arcessitor would you describe someone forced to stockholm syndrome themselves into living with someone as love? I wouldn't, yet that's exactly what arranged marriage has been for most of history. The modern ideal of two people making a decision to form a family and willingly compromising and learning to live with each other, despite being fully able to leave at any point, is far more romantic.
Yes, it allows for a lot more divorces than otherwise and especially here in the US we have a lot of spoiled brats who pop out children endlessly and don't know how to compromise, but you have to be exceptionally narrow minded to think a low divorce rate means more happy families, when really all it does is make people hide the broken-ness of the home from the rest of the world. The options aren't just "love is carnal attraction" and "love is settling with circumstances you aren't allowed to change", there's plenty of room in between for what love actually is.
If you live in a culture where male and female roles in marriage are well laid out and accepted, with the addition of divorce being heavily scrutinized, then an arranged marriage makes a lot of sense. I believe it was CS Lewis who said something to the effect that your true love, as a concept, develops into the person that you marry. But I think it included the idea that both fully commit to the relationship.
It's literally always been the most successful families and marriages.
I worry about that girl...
I like all tropes
The more I hear it the worse it gets 💀
But it kinda makes sense what she is saying
hmmm.
Strangely, if you look at statistics as a whole, arranged marriages are more successful and happier than the regular marriages. Dizzy does have her experiences with bad ones. But, in general, it seems removing the courting aspects leads to people just getting to know each other and communicating and working out problems like an adult, instead of just dumping the relationship. I do disagree with the practice just under freedom of choice and association principles. But those are the results.
It may simply have a lot more to do with the consequences. Look up what happens when a bride runs away from an arranged marriage in India, for example. It's pretty brutal.
Yeah Indians love to brag about these statistics, but a statistic is just one part of it.
Just look at the difference between what a Brazilian would call a pizza and what an Italian would call a pizza...
And then realize in what kind of culture arranged marriages flourish.
To be fair, in many of those arranged marriage, infidelity is just a given, both of them would know about the other but don't care enough
Cope.
The global average divorce rate of "love marriages" is 40% while in arranged marriages is only 4%.
70% of divorces in the US are due to infidelity.
@@MASJYT i mean, in sandñand divorce is when you kill your child wife
@@MASJYT Yeah, because in a lot of the countries where arranged marriage is common, it's also considered a requirement to off your daughter if she runs away from the arranged marriage, otherwise your entire family loses honour.
I'm sure if the consequence for divorce in a love marriage was immolation the rate would be lower too.
@@MASJYT correct me if im wrong , but most of cultures that do aranged marriage usually don't have a option of divorce(or is heavy stigmatized). So that could accout for most of that difference.
@@RRninja-jq6lp Good for them, we used to be the same not that long ago. Divorce has been trivialized in America to the point of absurdity.
Ironically the older i get the more value i see in it.
I dont know nobody who got married who slept around and was happy, also i seriously doubt Dizzys take, her third hand stories from her Chinese friends of a friend of a friend are probably not real.
Shes an american/canadian, nobody there is getting arrange married, not even the asian "minority" that by this point is in millions. Dizzy always has an excuse why shes single and avoiding men, most of them pretty weird, all to avoid confronting that her far left feminist ideology is designed to keep her single and miserable.
Arrange marriages still exist, but aren't """forced""" like your parents saying "s/he is really cute and we know their parents so why not go on a date, but we are not forcing you *wink**wink*"
@@rafresendenrafresenden.1644
You ever hear of such situation? I didnt. It reeks of urban myth shit.
The sad reality is nobody today is getting married, over 50% of people are single, all those stories are fake or 50 + years old.
Not to be a doxer, but i saw dizzy, she a really pretty girl in her late 20ties, yet here she is, single, paying off a debt after her sister, juggling vtubing and her day job, while saying she wants kids but hates her married family.
So instead she plays babysitter for retards like us online to make money.
I just feel all those stories(like the one dizzy tells) are some fantasy, people used to be happier and we keep rewriting history in hopes it makes us feel better,
Nah it's still giga fucked up.
Just because the West went full 180 polar opposite extreme hypergamy to the max mode doesn't mean the old one is ok.
See the ones where a literal 12-13 year old(or 9 specifically, i'm just avoiding to mention a certain religion) arranged marriage to an old man and only needs a dowry then has free access to do whatever he wants.
The more ideal ones are conservative-like places where there is still courting, and parents still have a say, but not completely able to stonewall.
The Amish unironically got it right, as with many things they got it right again.
Makes me appreciate Philippines' courting(in PH language: ligaw) style in hindsight.
Just call her a femcel instead of all that bullshit
Funnier that way atleast
@googleslocik Ok time to take your meds anon.