What we see in intellectuals like Noam. It is easy to read Noam as a creature. Noam lays it all out with not his grand puzzle. We just seen all the missing pieces. Noam and Marx act superior, smart material linguistics that mean nothing. It is all internal constructed nonsense of made up linguistics. Nothing applies to the real world nor has it been applied in reality! All the fantasies of Marx and Noam. Are monuments to failure. That is are main problem with intellectuals! It is great to have big creative fun wild thinking . However, if you can not get it to work in the real world after 175 years. Better stop thinking and start testing on a small scale then improve on working applications. Your super big untested big ideas just end up killing people. Like this video points out. ruclips.net/video/UnkMA0l7Af8/видео.html Noam's base-line soul and his books are based on big envy, anger and using big violence to obtain his untested contentment. Just like Marx. That is very easy to see. He covers it up with overly complex meaningless linguistics. None of his words are tested in reality. Call him on that fact and he will fall back into a corner. He is just a poet. Dreamers love mad poets. I am an engineer. I am not great just one of millions in the world. If you want to make a bridge. Most of the time you base your idea on past bridges that worked. You refine the design based on geological tests. Wind tests, material testing, Finite Element Analysis testing. Live load testing, in-process construction testing ect. ect. Most engineers do not consider them self's intellectuals. nor do they like to be called intellectuals are all theory. An engineer is happy when he see's the mile long bridge across a bay transporting millions of cars and truck for many many years in safety. The Workers that build the bridge get the satisfaction of knowing they built that dang thing. These underlying applied realities to make something work do not exist in the minds of Noam, Marxists or most intellectuals.
@@doreekaplan2589 oh boy, I commented that 8 years ago, so much has changed since than, so much… new information has emerged, and I can see patterns now much better
Could you imagine seeing him sitting on a bench and feeding pigeons? You'd sit down, say one thing, and realize very quickly that this man is an absolute genius. Quite a surprise but a welcome one.
Excellent Discussion between Professors Noam Chomsky and Lawrence Krauss, kindred spirits in the search for truth and liberty in a world that is always at a critical crossroads between enlightenment, creativity and peace to irrationality, destruction and aggression. It is really great to see the two of these great men in discussion about everything from human intelligence, social structures to conflict and aggression and the development of our civilization both technologically and morally and the responsibility of intellectuals to seek the truth and expose lies no matter what authorities say.
Ray N Today is of course Holocaust remembrance day. Critics like Keith Harman Snow critique what he calls the Holocaust Industry; and the profits being made off of countless heinous murders. Contrast that with zero collective memory in the West about the murder of Cambodians by the Khmer Rouge. First hand accounts such as this put into acute contrast the wildly differing results of mass genocide on a population years later. Needless to say both are disturbing.
@@Jarjarjar21 I agree... I think once upon a time he would've reacted to that in a negative light, i.e. don't revere me... now he sees it as "there's a new generation that are going to challenge the status quo"
Aside form politics, can anyone tell me why is Chomsky so admired? I doubt that his followers understand his work on linguistics, so I suspect the admiration comes from Chomsky's political stance.
@@samerdrich5579 he's like a Bernie Sanders of the intellectual world, he's been morally consistent and had the gall to stick it out for 90 years, the man has been consistently calling out atrocious and inhumane foreign policy decisions since forever. He's a reliable and trustworthy point of information, why wouldn't people be appreciative of him?
Chomsky is an intellectual activist, considering and exploring issues before forming an opinion then acting on them - a great example. He will be one of the few who are respected far into the future when people look back.
He merely does what most of us were told in school we should do, in terms of thinking and laying out an argument. We simply refuse to have open and honest discussions. It's not really intelligence that's lacking.
He’s an idiot with the same conclusion to every equation. America bad. It’s like Trump. Everything Trump does the answer is Orange Man bad. Trump sends troops to Syria, Orange man bad. Trump brings troops home from Syria, Orange Man bad. Well Chomsky which one is it? Maybe Chomsky should think a little deeper. Krauss isn’t much better. Krauss tells us that the universe came from nothing. Krauss couldn’t tell us where life comes from. He couldn’t create a single protein let alone a complete cell. And then he gets political which makes him a blithering idiot. Ditto with God.
This was an excellent interview which I have share in every possible place I can post awareness. Thank you Noam Chomsky and Lawrence Krauss
4 года назад
*Look through the pictures & you will find Krauss hanging out with Epstein Birds of a feather flock together = Once a friend of presidents, the ultra-rich and the elite of Wall Street’s bankers - plus a major benefactor to Harvard University - Jeffrey Epstein handled portfolios estimated to be worth over $15 billion. Then he became ensnared in a scandal involving the sexual abuse of underage girls. He is seen here, pre-scandal, at left, in conversation with Alan Dershowitz, one of America’s best-known legal experts and a Harvard Law professor emeritus, at a Cambridge event. Dershowitz became a key member of Epstein’s legal team. Read more here: www.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/article232385422.html#storylink=cpy Harvey Weinstein, Jeffery Epstein & Hugh Hefner were molesting all those that wanted initiation into his world. There pictures of Harvey with Jeffrey Epstein = i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article21054671.ece/ALTERNATES/s615/4_PAY-Epstein-Maxwella.jpg Oprah feeding Harvey = pbs.twimg.com/media/DTB1B12VQAAOHKa?format=jpg&name=small Harvey feeding Bill Clinton = duckduckgo.com/?q=Harvey+with+Jeffrey+Epstein&t=ffab&atb=v241-4__&iar=images&iax=images&ia=images&iai=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn1.thr.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2F2016%2F11%2Fmc_05987_approved-h_2016.jpg Revealed: Bill Clinton, Mick Jagger and Donald Trump were in black book of Prince Andrew’s sex abuser friend Jeffrey Epstein www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2897836/How-Prince-Andrew-s-sex-abuser-friend-Jeffrey-Epstein-kept-list-nicknamed-Holy-Grail-great-good-Bill-Clinton-Tony-Blair-Mick-Jagger-Donald-Trump.html Billionaire Pervert Jeffrey Epstein And His Famous Friends A Primer archive.org/details/BillionairePervertJeffreyEpsteinAndHisFamousFriendsAPrimer1/page/n9/mode/2up *lawrence krauss, Steven Pinker, Obama, Bloomberg, Trump, Naomi Campbell, Hillary Clinton, Kevin Spacey, Chris Tucker, Rothschilds, former member of charles Manson gang Nancy Pelosi, Lawrence Summers, Bill Gates, Alec Baldwin, Oprah, Katie Couric, George Stephanopoulos, Prince Andrew, Kenneth Starr, ADRENOCHROME 101, WALNUT SAUCE, HOLLYWOOD SICKO'S JONESING ruclips.net/video/ZMLCF3ynxgk/видео.html imgur.com/Al0vGo0 freebeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/bloomberg-weinstein.jpg cdn.newspunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/weinstein-epstein.jpg pbs.twimg.com/media/D3ywNHvW4AAquAT.jpg img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/59e353052d0000971730a55b.jpeg?cache=mqJUUaVcQm&ops=1200_630 freebeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/bloomberg-weinstein-736x529.jpg us.v-cdn.net/5021252/uploads/editor/6t/ddhauycct47l.png external-preview.redd.it/1EDKVj9ZIO87ijRgipOpdt8i80_ni7dpfpivesrkevk.jpg?width=1024&auto=webp&s=1586ea878d02fafb8d5c927c38be4d44d0907a81 www.small-screen.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/jeffrey-epstein-with-bill-clinton.jpg eurolandexperience.files.wordpress.com/2019/10/jeffrey-epstein-with-bill-gates.jpg external-preview.redd.it/vaOjhnEj0odCffzeYZ1ApNy4HG8TfeBdpERPMLd-jbg.jpg?auto=webp&s=98e643781001593950096629168cbb7c4018bbd8 1.bp.blogspot.com/-hXn8yAFXBK8/VupXUSk2RGI/AAAAAAAATEw/Bylb-UETfbkOOLu9ufbsaxnZ-VKDlz1oQ/s320/trump-clinton.jpg bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/tulsaworld.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/9/08/9088c8ae-50fe-5664-81e3-689d037255ac/5d542acda7aea.preview.jpg?crop=1821%2C1024%2C0%2C56&resize=1120%2C630&order=crop%2Cresize vashiva.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/fact5-slider-2.jpg Head of the Snake - Wexner, Maxwell’s, Mossad & Mega Group Exposed ruclips.net/video/dzDWA9_mUgc/видео.html Blackstone Vault Epstein files www.blackstoneintel.com/epstein Ted Gunderson - Former FBI Chief Exposes 'Illuminati' (disturbing content) ruclips.net/video/EqjNa-Jpsf0/видео.html TED GUNDERSON CHRONICLES ruclips.net/video/4JJmXElmo8w/видео.html No Questions Asked - How the British Establishment hide child abuse ruclips.net/video/j82JVnRDI4k/видео.html The Monarchy British VIP pedophile ring for decades ruclips.net/video/hg0PVBYcQMc/видео.html How The British State Protects Paedophiles ruclips.net/video/penL6zLuQGE/видео.html Britain’s Pedophilia ELITE… [EXPOSED] 2018 Documentary ruclips.net/video/4KkD_k_4_lM/видео.html Satanists & Pedophiles Run The World ruclips.net/video/IgP88z6h-Zk/видео.html THE STRANGE STORY OF THE QUEEN AND THE CHILDREN WHO ‘DISAPPEARED’ indianinthemachine.wordpress.com/2011/03/01/the-strange-story-of-the-queen-and-the-children-who-disappeared-from-native-residential-schools/ Queen Elizabeth and 10 Missing Children Truth With Trishaly ruclips.net/video/Qnk23kcSxKA/видео.html Queen Elizabeth Found Guilty in Missing Children Case nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/2016/02/queen-elizabeth-found-guilty-in-missing.html Mass graves of Mohawk children have been uncovered by ground-penetrating radar at the Mohawk Institute, a residential school for Mohawk operated by the Church of England and the Vatican before its closure in 1970. www.bibliotecapleyades.net/vatican/esp_vatican69.htm THE QUEEN AND MISSING KIDS aangirfan.blogspot.com/2011/03/queen-and-missing-kids.html Proof Queen Elizabeth killed kids in Canada! ruclips.net/video/ij5R5xr5HEk/видео.html No justice for Epstein accusers as Queen denies ties - Galloway ruclips.net/video/KE5uIWm_8ho/видео.html The Origins of Jeffrey Epstein | 1971 ruclips.net/video/qd9Gbh-u-VM/видео.html Fall of the Cabal Revelations: Meet the Scherffs [Bush] + Meet the Hitlers [Obama] - Robert Potter ruclips.net/video/5Sdi2zN9TM4/видео.html You can download the book for free here www.dropbox.com/s/92kitdf2t1077o8/For%20free%20in%20booksVeil_of_Invisibility.pdf.zip?dl=0&file_subpath=%2FFor+free+in+booksVeil_of_Invisibility.pdf Meet The Scherffs www.dtss.us/blog/meet-the-scherffs/ Is George H.W. Bush Really Prescott Bush's Son? Or Is He The Son Of Inventor Nikola Tesla's German-Born Accountant, George H. Scherff, Sr.? rense.com/general69/prescc.htm This satanic blackmailing has been going on for a long time now = The Fatty Arbuckle Scandal www.neatorama.com/2017/04/14/The-Fatty-Arbuckle-Scandal/ George Washington and his "White Slaves" / Indentured in the Mt Vernon Plantation / Truth ruclips.net/video/E-QxWjPeg3A/видео.html From Indigenous American to African American // Meet The Original People of The America's ruclips.net/video/X774BnT05SQ/видео.html White Servitude // Indentured in the Penal Colonies of America / The True Middle Passage youtu.be/XExqydi7 The Truth about Abraham Lincoln // The Runaway Indentured Servant Colored Man ruclips.net/video/QKtkZDHSfXw/видео.html White Servitude & Free Negro Masters // The Invention of the White Race/Indentured Servitude ruclips.net/video/831JPi_4hYk/видео.html White Servitude // Convicts, Political & Religious Prisoners / Hutchison-Lambert Genealogy ruclips.net/video/lBjAKx2-MNY/видео.html White Servitude & Free Negro Masters // The Untold truth of American Slavery / Indentured Service ruclips.net/video/k8gkiHQyDrc/видео.html Untold Ancient American Truth // Mayach/Turtle/First/Maya/Mu/Mother/Atlantis/Egypt/Amazon ruclips.net/video/fA_0TycA3tw/видео.html And Then They Came for the Books... ruclips.net/video/Z_fGfjZrPfM/видео.html
But most importantly, also contributes with own qualified arguments, so that it becomes a real live dialogue. Just reading loud questions is not good interviewing.
The opening introduction brought tears to my eyes. I've been following Noam for decades and he never disappoints even if the subject matter may be disturbing. Very well worth the extra time. ❤
As someone who loves learning and the pursuit of knowledge, and who has an appreciation of critical thinking, I highly value Chomsky's take on deflating your ability to orate efficaciously in order that people value what you say, and not just how you say it. At the same time, your burden is passing along the idea of critical thinking. And if the benefactor doesnt already possess, then you have to be oratorically persuasive. It like the epitome of irony. I love the whole landscape painted by these two artists, and crave more of it.
I am an admitted Chomskyite! Many years of study, observation and deep thought are always evident when he speaks! We need him around in this day and age, especially! 🙏❤️✌️🌎🌞🌻🦋🎶🎼🌈❤️🙏
What we see in intellectuals like Noam. It is easy to read Noam as a creature. Noam lays it all out with not his grand puzzle. We just seen all the missing pieces. Noam and Marx act superior, smart material linguistics that mean nothing. It is all internal constructed nonsense of made up linguistics. Nothing applies to the real world nor has it been applied in reality! All the fantasies of Marx and Noam. Are monuments to failure. That is are main problem with intellectuals! It is great to have big creative fun wild thinking . However, if you can not get it to work in the real world after 175 years. Better stop thinking and start testing on a small scale then improve on working applications. Your super big untested big ideas just end up killing people. Like this video points out. ruclips.net/video/UnkMA0l7Af8/видео.html Noam's base-line soul and his books are based on big envy, anger and using big violence to obtain his untested contentment. Just like Marx. That is very easy to see. He covers it up with overly complex meaningless linguistics. None of his words are tested in reality. Call him on that fact and he will fall back into a corner. He is just a poet. Dreamers love mad poets. I am an engineer. I am not great just one of millions in the world. If you want to make a bridge. Most of the time you base your idea on past bridges that worked. You refine the design based on geological tests. Wind tests, material testing, Finite Element Analysis testing. Live load testing, in-process construction testing ect. ect. Most engineers do not consider them self's intellectuals. nor do they like to be called intellectuals are all theory. An engineer is happy when he see's the mile long bridge across a bay transporting millions of cars and truck for many many years in safety. The Workers that build the bridge get the satisfaction of knowing they built that dang thing. These underlying applied realities to make something work do not exist in the minds of Noam, Marxists or most intellectuals.
No. I hated school and dropped out of college. The rigidity was too much. But I listen to this sort of stuff while I drive, cook, lift weights etc. Sometimes I think I have some form of ADHD
@@Creamy6oodness You might very well. During college, I had to smoke a cigarette each break to slow my brain down to be able to withstand the slow pace of the courses. I learned way more spending time in the library, studying all the books on a matter I could find, solving problems on my own. But that's also where I believe Chomsky makes a mistake. Not everybody is built this way. Most of my fellow students were not interested in doing that huge intellectual effort. They were much more interested in getting knowledge poured into their heads like a liquid. Also, only a few of the professors were able to each me by just watching over my shoulder, telling me that there's another book I should read, or that what I was looking into might be connected to some other field I may want to look into, and just very discreetly guiding me, based on the huge knowledge they themselves had already accumulated, at the same time being humble about it. If we'd rely on the few professors of this kind, and on the few students who are willing and able to learn this way, we'd still be in the middle ages, and modern science would be magic to most people.
Esteban Nemo who do you mean when referring to ASMR? I'm racking my mind to try and work out who it is but my brain fails me, it's probably the lack of sleep and stress of other things causing me to have what I can only describe as a brain fart, thanks.
At this point, I don't know what is to come. But the intoduction to Noam Chomsky by Krauss is a great start. Thank you all involved in making this available here.
wrining this from october 2024. noam is speechless after a massive stroke but still alive and have been reportedly rehabilitating. his intellectual weight and contribution to the society are enormous. long live dr. chomsky. your voice is missed badly 💔
I might be the universe's biggest nerd, but when I first saw the title of this video and realized it was genuine I just about rolled around on the floor with delight.
Will Griffin Anytime you got an old athiest jew circuit speaker like Chomsky spinning yarns about everything under the sun except jewish usury caste system. You got an old jew shekeler...
My respect for L.Krauss skyrocketed.Brave man very brave and exactly what sort of people this age of humans needs,hopefully more of the bright people will speak up !not against america against the greed against injustice for all our sake
@@dreamingrightnow1174 he loves to come across as a "Naughty boy" Krauss is a terrible nontalent - a disgrace to his field , and a "Assgrabber" - with a long lineup of young female students he just couldnt help himself from grabbing and being a total sexist jerkoff , who believe AYNYONE find his craterface and plumb style, attracting,-
Apo Galiev It’s a load of crap. This book isn’t worth the media it’s propagated on. No one should waste their time even considering looking into it at all. Pure nonsense and dribble. Only the soft-minded could possibly take it seriously.
I was afraid all the comments here would be very earnest and intellectual. I'm so glad to see that, as with all youtube videos, it's mostly rants and insults.
Aside form politics, can anyone tell me why is Chomsky so admired? I doubt that his followers understand his work on linguistics, so I suspect the admiration comes from Chomsky's political stance.
@@samerdrich5579 Not just his stance(s). John Kerry criticized Bush's war. Heck, Donald Trump used the mass-rejection, late arriving, of Bush's war, to attack Jeb so he couldn't win on the coattails of his younger brother. Chomsky provides analysis, mostly factual, about US and Western violent interventions, by so called liberal intellectuals, and covert ops that became known.
I thoroughly enjoyed that discussion. For me, the great joy of such gentle but deep discussion is available to me in my own home - I am at home in my chair but right with them. If I don't grasp a point being put forward I can stop, rewind and re approach. I can stop and think through what is being suggested or observed. How lucky are we, this generation who can observe and participate in so many debates and discussions. Chomsky is growing on me. Of course I am familiar with him but the internet allows us to pursue him throughout his life listening as he casts off pearls and thoughts over his shoulder.
Every time I hear Noam Chomsky speak, I am in awe of his evident intellect. He seems to easily express thoughts and concepts which, though very deep, appear to be obvious once they are spoken.
My new hobby is listening to science lectures while going to sleep. How lucky are we to have such access to these discussions and debates with the academics of the times. Thanks very much🤙 And i totally agree with the comments laurence is a remarkable moderator.
Yeah it's great, I do the same thing. Also, Terrence McKenna lectures are great to listen to at bedtime. The Trialogue Series with Sheldrake and Abraham is really great also
Amazing to see these two fine men on a stage together. Chomsky still has his dry wit. I don't recall see him giggle as much before either; endearing. Krauss has the wherewithal to pair with Noam, and challenge someone he has respect for. GREAT POST.
1:27:32 "It happens because we're supporting it." That statement could not be more correct. Every fault in our society, is due to society, not individuals. Each individual should take personal responsibility, so our systems put in place can function successfully.
What we see in intellectuals like Noam. It is easy to read Noam as a creature. Noam lays it all out with not his grand puzzle. We just seen all the missing pieces. Noam and Marx act superior, smart material linguistics that mean nothing. It is all internal constructed nonsense of made up linguistics. Nothing applies to the real world nor has it been applied in reality! All the fantasies of Marx and Noam. Are monuments to failure. That is are main problem with intellectuals! It is great to have big creative fun wild thinking . However, if you can not get it to work in the real world after 175 years. Better stop thinking and start testing on a small scale then improve on working applications. Your super big untested big ideas just end up killing people. Like this video points out. ruclips.net/video/UnkMA0l7Af8/видео.html Noam's base-line soul and his books are based on big envy, anger and using big violence to obtain his untested contentment. Just like Marx. That is very easy to see. He covers it up with overly complex meaningless linguistics. None of his words are tested in reality. Call him on that fact and he will fall back into a corner. He is just a poet. Dreamers love mad poets. I am an engineer. I am not great just one of millions in the world. If you want to make a bridge. Most of the time you base your idea on past bridges that worked. You refine the design based on geological tests. Wind tests, material testing, Finite Element Analysis testing. Live load testing, in-process construction testing ect. ect. Most engineers do not consider them self's intellectuals. nor do they like to be called intellectuals are all theory. An engineer is happy when he see's the mile long bridge across a bay transporting millions of cars and truck for many many years in safety. The Workers that build the bridge get the satisfaction of knowing they built that dang thing. These underlying applied realities to make something work do not exist in the minds of Noam, Marxists or most intellectuals.
massive dissapointment with the sound for the first 45 minutes... I mean seriously, on THIS show? Whoever was working the sound should be ashamed professionally.
AsFewFalseThingsAsPossible I think the problem mighta been that they had the levels turned up because Chomsky speaks so softly, would that have caused the feedback?
This was a great conversation. I wasn't aware that Noam was also interested in science because I have been living under a rock for a decade. He explains the connections between linguistics, behavioral science, and physics so concisely. Sometimes people think I am not paying attention because I seem to get lost in thought but in the truth I am just busying processing their words and picking apart their internal process. Which may stem from my years editing. I think the words people choose out of all the probabilities of word order are interesting. One just has to be careful not to jump to conclusions and to not make a defined judgement based on their interpretation of what those choices mean because there are always exceptions, lost in translations, and bias.
A really, really productive and illuminating exchange. How nice to see how Krauss, the great cosmo-monologist, submits to the true discipline of interviewing, tapping into Chomsky's mind with the just the right questions, knowing when to defer, when to challenge.
He's not giving a physics lecture here, oddly enough... And may I ask just what the fuck he's supposed to do, being a cosmologist, but monologue on cosmology? That's his job...and I'd rather have my fingernails pulled off than listen to Chomsky for 2 more minutes, since even on his own subject he's soporific when he's not being inaccurate, or even downright bloodless.
To see the amount of truth and wisdom come from his mouth make me believe once more in humanity and the precise goal of being an intellectuals is to speak the truth , honesty so you can touch the souls of victims of war crimes and send condolences in defending them by telling the truth , thank you Naom chomosky from IRAQ , baghdad
Too bad about the sound problems at the beginning, they were somewhat distracting. If anyone is wondering, they get finally resolved around 26:50 mark when new microphones are brought in. Other than that, I did enjoy watching this, although it was more of an interview than a dialogue. But I guess in this case that's okay. ;)
i am very lucky to be able to watch his discussion on this channel. I just want to underline his last statement that : "we have to make a distinction here between individual rasionality and the institutional rasionality" and his views on today's climate change issue: "you don't have to be a climate scientist to understand this much about what's going on" very thoughtful and enlightening. understanding his thoughts requires a clear thinking and understanding the context of the discussion. may he always be given health. 🤲🙏🏼
Such a great discussion. Thank you so much for capturing and uploading it. I was very pleasantly surprised when it showed up in my subscription feed. It is now depriving me from sleep though!
I'm glad I can actually hear Noam in this video. So often he seems to mumble and speak so softly that I have to turn the volume all the way up and quickly lower it whenever anyone else begins to speak.
I am grateful to Professor Noam Chomsky for informing me of United States diplomat George Kennan decision in 1947 to allow war torn Europe and European settler colonizers to rebuild on the back of Africa. I appreciate all that he has done. Professor Noam Chomskys information enabled me to better understand my reality.
There is not enough that I can say about Noam Chomsky that can trump the plaudits bestowed on him. This video was recently shot at ASU as part of a series hosted and led by Lawrence Krauss, himself not just a noted physicist, but a public intellectual as well. If you believe that there is another way for the world to revolve than the out of control spin set in motion by the current global and economic crisis, then you must avail yourself of this interview, done in two parts, the first of which is linked here. Chomsky is a "public intellectual", a term he deserves. However, he is not your average snooty, ten dollar word upper crust sort, and that is really part of what makes him different, and his thoughts accessible. He does not get enough credit for the manner in which he communicates, the attractiveness of his logic, and the common sense that his opinions reflect. If you are attracted to what he has to say, and you feel as I do about his style of rhetoric, I highly recommend that you encourage others with concerns about the future of the world we live in, to put aside their initial abhorrence of the word intellectual, and their hatred for elitism, and just listen for five minutes to what he has to say. Chomsky's words need to be proliferated far beyond the world of the already converted. He needs to be heard by the masses of people who are the power base on which change can evolve.
I really liked it that Krauss did this discussion. I bet Krauss has many followers who have never heard of Chomsky, so I'm glad he did it. And good that he didn't turned it into an endless discussion about religion.
I'll second your comments on both counts. Krauss, as a "star" of the ASU series, does a great job with his discussion approach to bringing out the ideas of those who sit in the chair next to him on stage. One admonition of course, and that is that he has guests on who he admires so there isn't a sense that you have to brace yourself hard for the antagonistic question that you think may be coming. After all, he's talking to a friend, and that friend has good, solid and meaningful things to say. So it just seems to flow with Krauss's approach. And yes, let us not put that threadbare discussion of religion on the docket. There are plenty of other opportunities to air out the scientists grievances against religion.
George Aponick Christopher Hitchens on Chomsky: '[Chomsky] has now been impeached by his own standards, since scrutiny of the evidence does not bear him out on Serbia or Afghanistan or Iraq. It didn't bear him out on Cambodia either, though he was never a "Holocaust denier" or anything like it. And he has, I think, ceased to be of any use to young people who might pardonably doubt the official story.' 'My quarrel with Chomsky goes back to the Balkan wars of the 1990s, where he more or less openly represented the "Serbian Socialist Party" (actually the national-socialist and expansionist dictatorship of Slobodan Milosevic) as the victim. Many of us are proud of having helped organize to prevent the slaughter and deportation of Europe's oldest and largest and most tolerant Muslim minority, in Bosnia-Herzegovina and in Kosovo. But at that time, when they were real, Chomsky wasn't apparently interested in Muslim grievances. He only became a voice for that when the Taliban and Al Qaeda needed to be represented in their turn as the victims of a "silent genocide" in Afghanistan. Let me put it like this, if a supposed scholar takes the Christian-Orthodox side when it is the aggressor, and then switches to taking the "Muslim" side when Muslims commit mass murder, I think that there is something very nasty going on. And yes, I don't think it is exaggerated to describe that nastiness as "anti-American" when the power that stops and punishes both aggressions is the United States … In some awful way, his regard for the underdog has mutated into support for mad dogs. This is not at all like watching the implosion of an obvious huckster and jerk like Michael Moore, who would have made a perfectly good Brownshirt populist. The collapse of Chomsky feels to me more like tragedy'
Matthew Singh-Dosanjh Thank you for the insight you presented quoting Christopher Hitchens who I also admire for the intellect and insight he displayed during his tragically shortened life. That said, nobody is perfect in their representations or perceptions about complex international issues. I certainly will follow up on this quote and research it in its larger context. There are a couple responses I'd like to present. First, Hitchens let me down when he evolved out of his socialist positions. He also disappointed me when he supported the criminal invasion of Iraq. He declared that we were somehow saving the Middle East from a savage dictator. I opposed the war from the beginning and wrote that it would be the disaster it turned out to be for all peoples of the area. I've not been to Iraq but I have been to the West Bank and I was appalled by the mistreatment of Arab Muslims at the hands of a government supported by the U.S. and I would then suppose, Christopher Hitchens. One other comment, and I suppose more of a question, and I would like to know, after following Chomsky, what is your opinion generally of Chomsky's views on the world we live in and the problems we face. I'm not presenting the question as a challenge, but rather an honest want of trying to understanding of your points of view. I hope you are able to read this and respond.
This is just great thanks for posting - along with Hitchens Harris Dawkins when he’s not being exasperating, Bart Erdmann Bishop Spong these 2 are my faves and experiencing them together having a real dialogue just f in makes me happy . The perfect thing to watch after a bowl of Nightmare Cookie nugs!
What we see in intellectuals like Noam. It is easy to read Noam as a creature. Noam lays it all out with not his grand puzzle. We just seen all the missing pieces. Noam and Marx act superior, smart material linguistics that mean nothing. It is all internal constructed nonsense of made up linguistics. Nothing applies to the real world nor has it been applied in reality! All the fantasies of Marx and Noam. Are monuments to failure. That is are main problem with intellectuals! It is great to have big creative fun wild thinking . However, if you can not get it to work in the real world after 175 years. Better stop thinking and start testing on a small scale then improve on working applications. Your super big untested big ideas just end up killing people. Like this video points out. ruclips.net/video/UnkMA0l7Af8/видео.html Noam's base-line soul and his books are based on big envy, anger and using big violence to obtain his untested contentment. Just like Marx. That is very easy to see. He covers it up with overly complex meaningless linguistics. None of his words are tested in reality. Call him on that fact and he will fall back into a corner. He is just a poet. Dreamers love mad poets. I am an engineer. I am not great just one of millions in the world. If you want to make a bridge. Most of the time you base your idea on past bridges that worked. You refine the design based on geological tests. Wind tests, material testing, Finite Element Analysis testing. Live load testing, in-process construction testing ect. ect. Most engineers do not consider them self's intellectuals. nor do they like to be called intellectuals are all theory. An engineer is happy when he see's the mile long bridge across a bay transporting millions of cars and truck for many many years in safety. The Workers that build the bridge get the satisfaction of knowing they built that dang thing. These underlying applied realities to make something work do not exist in the minds of Noam, Marxists or most intellectuals.
On topics I know something about, like the Taliban, I take what Chomsky says with a grain of salt. The Taliban were created by the Pakistani ISI. Taliban religious ideology, influenced heavily by Deobandi and so-called Wahabi dogma, is foreign to Afghans as well. The Taliban also destroyed the tribal system of consensus and eliminated the traditional role of women in Afghan society. The Taliban never controlled all of Afghanistan, either. (Their counterparts, The Northern Alliance eventually drove them out of Kabul, not US troops) The Taliban gave open support to bin Laden to set up terrorist training camps in Afghanistan, knowing full well UBL's enmity towards the West and the US. And then there is their horrible human rights record, and the destruction of the Bamiyan Buddhas. Does anyone really think the Taliban would have been fair-minded and reasonable negotiators? Yet in spite of all this, Chomsky reacts in mock puzzlement at the US not taking their "offer" to turn over bin Laden seriously. As if the Taliban had the political or moral authority or will to do such a thing. I follow Chomsky, but cannot agree with him here. His one-size-fits-all argument about the US being the progenitor of every conflict in the world comes off as a default response.
Esteban Nemo Condemning U.S. attack on Afghanistan in 2001 is like condemning U.S. attack on France in 1944. Some people have a view that if U.S. intervenes in something, everything that follows is their fault. If the U.S. does not intervene (like in Rwanda) then everything also is their fault. Some actually blame U.S: on what ISIS does.
***** "Condemning U.S. attack on Afghanistan in 2001 is like condemning U.S. attack on France in 1944." It's really not. At all. You could make a case that the US invasion of Normandy was justified. You cannot make the same case with the US invasion of Afghanistan, which was totally unjustified.
Well, it's an interesting analogy (though not one I would have made) and I think there are parallels, but really, it was the Northern Alliance, the Afghans themselves, that overthrew the Taliban, not US troops. America deployed limited special forces during the invasion and provided the Northern Alliance with air support and artillery. But getting back to the WW2 analogy, in a sense Afghanistan was liberated during the 2001 invasion as France was back during D-Day. At least we can say 15 million Afghans were liberated that day- the female population.
Chomsky's point about leaving out theatrics in speech is something I've always believed in. If you're trying to teach, leave any charisma or eloquence out of it. These are nothing more but emotional appeals. That isn't teaching, it's manipulating.
Rather ironic he would say that. It's rather clear that he uses a great deal of theatrics, charisma and appeal to peoples emotions, to make his point. I doubt he lacks the self awareness to see this.
Ian Escobar I disagree. I recently had the most boring lectures with an old professor who was pretty much talking to himself about theory of literature (my kinda thing) with monotone voice and no "theathre" and I literally remember nothing. I was sleeping. But maybe he wasn't just good in verbalizing his thoughts and then a very energetic, quick, intense and fun lectures with another professor about cognitive and generative grammar (not my kinda thing, but not anymore) and I was so exited about this topic. I think you need to find a nice balance between not being "too much" and being boring to death.
Me too, when I started to listen to Chomsky, it was really painful, cuz I was used to listen to charismatic speakers like Hitchens. But as time went on, I have learned so much more than I ever could. I learned to actually get interested in the words and the subject, and not the speaker. Listening to Chomsky speak, it's like listening him reading a book.
As a Canadian, I think the political slogan for the United States should be "Make America Smart Again". I think that Noam and Lawrence would agree with me.
It's amazing (or self-evident) that intellectuals like these two guys are never an important part of the political "process". Noam Chomsky has written 100+ books on the subject, and is roundly criticized and/or dismissed when the forum is political. If intellect and open-mindedness became an important part of our public discourse, then an AMAZING culture could be realized in the USA. Everyone is so busy with "one-upmanship" and how much fucking MONEY can you earn, that being a thinking human being doesn't matter anymore. This sort of interview/debate/lecture CONVERSATION should be mandatory viewing for everyone who is registered to vote. We might be able to weed out the scum that don't deserve an elected "office". If you can't comprehend what great minds are talking about, then you don't HAVE a great mind and shouldn't be able to LEAD what you can't follow.
I'm 58 and I remember that, in high-school, a solid 50% of all kids (and their parents) believed that reading, learning, knowledge, science, art, and intellectualism in general, was decidedly "uncool". These people never changed their attitudes, they still believe "thinking" is uncool, but they back candidates, in a cult of personality fashion, and vote.
@@mad_cat_1stHonestly, I hadn't noticed the date, but I certainly would have replied anyway. In the intervening years, we've seen how correct you were, 7 years ago. :)
"huge ego of Krauss"? True, I too would have a huge ego if I made some of the most important discoveries, and wrote some of the most important literature, on Astrophysics. But on what planet do you ground this insult? Seriously, I have never heard Krauss step out of line on any issue I've heard him speak about (except not being on board sending people to mars).
+ConnorJohn I've seen many other interventions by L.K., and a huge ego is always present among often a condescending tone towards others he share stage with, and keep in mind that normally those who share stage with L.K. are also great scholars or scientists. Nevertheless, my comment does not become an insult just cause you decide so, fortunately. Its merely a descriptiin of whatis observed, and I believe even L.K. admits of it. It not the first time after watching him I observe and comment on his ego, though its true that in previous comments I often also continue by highlighting that he has gain the right to inflate his ego by merit. In this particular video, the contrast is very appreciable when the humility of N.C. is put next to him.
+Osman Yousaf I agree that Kraus is a bit overbearing and pompous. It's also interesting how he tends to smile when talking about terrible things. I think these are mostly superficial flaws though; his ASU Origins Project is one of the only things to make Phoenix worth visiting.
He worked incredibly hard!! I'm not saying he doesn't have an ego, but just as any event host, he is guiding Noam, who tends to speak a long time and get into parenthesis and side comments, I love Noam, but Krauss had a tim limit, which he went over, he had a huge agenda connected to a lot of things that he rightly considers vital, like terrorism caused by us, climate change, Israel occupation, how religious dogmatism helps to exacerbate many political issues, etc. He's corky and funny, sometimes trying to find himself with his read shoes or snickers, or hats and other accoutrements, he has an agenda, etc but I don't perceive him to have a huge ego, he can be very humble, he is idealistic, he wishes to do something about the problems we face, and in fact he was incredibly reverent and respectful, he wanted to cover as much as possible much material Noam wrote about, the thing is Noam needs 2 events at least, he has covered so much material during his lifetime. Krauss was probably planning to over Noam's change from linguist to what motivated him to change with more time, and that didn't really happened! Let's appreciate people's efforts before we trash them!
+Malu Ribeiro Sorry you had the feeling I was trashing K. efforts, but its simply not the case. Also, Noam is well known for being a critic of short time format interviews, everyone knows this. He believes that elaborated answers are the only worthy answers, specially for such complex topics as the once you have mention.
@@alanburke1302 Nice, you one-upped him by removing the 'Pseudo-intellectual' portion from your comment. You didn't even attempt to say something intelligent, just spewed hatred-fueled insults. Give yourself a nice firm pat on the back for me, you sure taught him what's what!.. lmao..Children these days..
One of the most brilliant, open conversations I've had the pleasure to listen to. These 2 men sharing their intellectual prowess was such a pleasure to listen to. After hearing on the "main stream" news that Texas is terrified the big bad gov. is coming to take their guns! To think, people like Ted Cruz were elected to the office of Senate just makes me ill. Why are we not getting men like this into our politics? The closest thing is Bernie Sanders who speaks for people, not corporations.
I wonder if Noam knows the "woah" moments his listeners have, he doesnt seem to be schooling you. Hes always so humble like having a casual conversation lol
He reads almost every academic book printed. That keeps him pretty busy, I bet. The joke Krause made at the beginning. I had to read five books a night for a week, just to feel comfortable coming into this talk. That's the base line for a conversation, let alone keeping up with him. Look at those notes.
I can now listen to a conversation between Noam Chomsky and Lawrence Krauss while sitting on my couch here in Bangladesh.
Thank you internet.
What we see in intellectuals like Noam. It is easy to read Noam as a creature. Noam lays it all out with not his grand puzzle. We just seen all the missing pieces. Noam and Marx act superior, smart material linguistics that mean nothing. It is all internal constructed nonsense of made up linguistics. Nothing applies to the real world nor has it been applied in reality! All the
fantasies of Marx and Noam. Are monuments to failure. That is are main problem with intellectuals! It is great to have big creative fun wild thinking . However, if you can not get it to work in the real world after 175 years. Better stop thinking and start testing on a small scale then improve on working applications. Your super big untested big ideas just end up killing people. Like this video points out. ruclips.net/video/UnkMA0l7Af8/видео.html
Noam's base-line soul and his books are based on big envy, anger and using big violence to obtain his untested contentment. Just like Marx. That is very easy to see. He covers it up with overly complex meaningless linguistics. None of his words are tested in reality. Call him on that fact and he will fall back into a corner. He is just a poet. Dreamers love mad poets.
I am an engineer. I am not great just one of millions in the world. If you want to make a bridge. Most of the time you base your idea on past bridges that worked. You refine the design based on geological tests. Wind tests, material testing, Finite Element Analysis testing. Live load testing, in-process construction testing ect. ect. Most engineers do not consider them self's intellectuals. nor do they like to be called intellectuals are all theory. An engineer is happy when he see's the mile long bridge across a bay transporting millions of cars and truck for many many years in safety. The Workers that build the bridge get the satisfaction of knowing they built that dang thing. These underlying applied realities to make something work do not exist in the minds of Noam, Marxists or most intellectuals.
from Pakistan !! :)
Thank you for remind of this fact. I sometimes forget about the modern marvel of the internet, even with its warts an all.
@@TheConstitutionFirst That was a lot of copious, inane and illiterate word vomit.
@@shadeassassin9248 Maybe! Puke?
I have been reading or listening to Noam for 63 years and I still get something out of it.
Marxist philosophy is just plain fun and inherently moral: This video Nails it!
ruclips.net/video/UnkMA0l7Af8/видео.html
How old are you?
@@romaknafel4116 10 I am in High School.
Me too.
@@matthewbroe904 ikr
damn it, he is 86 year old and he is most lucid, self-aware, conscientious and mindful person I have ever heard.
He's now 95, still the same
@@doreekaplan2589 oh boy, I commented that 8 years ago, so much has changed since than, so much… new information has emerged, and I can see patterns now much better
Could you imagine seeing him sitting on a bench and feeding pigeons? You'd sit down, say one thing, and realize very quickly that this man is an absolute genius. Quite a surprise but a welcome one.
Me: ...Thoughts...
Chomsky: Well, in fact... Five hours later...
So in conclusion.
Me: 🧐 You don't say.
Excellent Discussion between Professors Noam Chomsky and Lawrence Krauss, kindred spirits in the search for truth and liberty in a world that is always at a critical crossroads between enlightenment, creativity and peace to irrationality, destruction and aggression. It is really great to see the two of these great men in discussion about everything from human intelligence, social structures to conflict and aggression and the development of our civilization both technologically and morally and the responsibility of intellectuals to seek the truth and expose lies no matter what authorities say.
Awesome dialogue, thanks Muon Ray
Muon Ray Well said!
I.
Ray N Today is of course Holocaust remembrance day. Critics like Keith Harman Snow critique what he calls the Holocaust Industry; and the profits being made off of countless heinous murders. Contrast that with zero collective memory in the West about the murder of Cambodians by the Khmer Rouge. First hand accounts such as this put into acute contrast the wildly differing results of mass genocide on a population years later. Needless to say both are disturbing.
Muon Ray Subbed lol
It has to blow Chomsky's mind that all these kids react to him like a rock star. Dude is legit cool
I'm sure it give him some hope.
@@Jarjarjar21 I agree... I think once upon a time he would've reacted to that in a negative light, i.e. don't revere me... now he sees it as "there's a new generation that are going to challenge the status quo"
Aside form politics, can anyone tell me why is Chomsky so admired? I doubt that his followers understand his work on linguistics, so I suspect the admiration comes from Chomsky's political stance.
@@samerdrich5579 he's like a Bernie Sanders of the intellectual world, he's been morally consistent and had the gall to stick it out for 90 years, the man has been consistently calling out atrocious and inhumane foreign policy decisions since forever. He's a reliable and trustworthy point of information, why wouldn't people be appreciative of him?
He is a rock star!
Chomsky is an intellectual activist, considering and exploring issues before forming an opinion then acting on them - a great example. He will be one of the few who are respected far into the future when people look back.
He merely does what most of us were told in school we should do, in terms of thinking and laying out an argument. We simply refuse to have open and honest discussions. It's not really intelligence that's lacking.
@@katarinaaram588 He's exceptionally good at spotting and disregarding bullshit
Where are they going to do their looking back from?
From a voice from 2020.
Tasit.
He’s an idiot with the same conclusion to every equation. America bad. It’s like Trump. Everything Trump does the answer is Orange Man bad. Trump sends troops to Syria, Orange man bad. Trump brings troops home from Syria, Orange Man bad. Well Chomsky which one is it? Maybe Chomsky should think a little deeper. Krauss isn’t much better. Krauss tells us that the universe came from nothing. Krauss couldn’t tell us where life comes from. He couldn’t create a single protein let alone a complete cell. And then he gets political which makes him a blithering idiot. Ditto with God.
This was an excellent interview which I have share in every possible place I can post awareness.
Thank you Noam Chomsky and Lawrence Krauss
*Look through the pictures & you will find Krauss hanging out with Epstein
Birds of a feather flock together =
Once a friend of presidents, the ultra-rich and the elite of Wall Street’s bankers - plus a major benefactor to Harvard University - Jeffrey Epstein handled portfolios estimated to be worth over $15 billion. Then he became ensnared in a scandal involving the sexual abuse of underage girls. He is seen here, pre-scandal, at left, in conversation with Alan Dershowitz, one of America’s best-known legal experts and a Harvard Law professor emeritus, at a Cambridge event. Dershowitz became a key member of Epstein’s legal team.
Read more here: www.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/article232385422.html#storylink=cpy
Harvey Weinstein, Jeffery Epstein & Hugh Hefner were molesting all those that wanted initiation into his world.
There pictures of Harvey with Jeffrey Epstein = i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article21054671.ece/ALTERNATES/s615/4_PAY-Epstein-Maxwella.jpg
Oprah feeding Harvey = pbs.twimg.com/media/DTB1B12VQAAOHKa?format=jpg&name=small
Harvey feeding Bill Clinton = duckduckgo.com/?q=Harvey+with+Jeffrey+Epstein&t=ffab&atb=v241-4__&iar=images&iax=images&ia=images&iai=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn1.thr.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2F2016%2F11%2Fmc_05987_approved-h_2016.jpg
Revealed: Bill Clinton, Mick Jagger and Donald Trump were in black book of Prince Andrew’s sex abuser friend Jeffrey Epstein
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2897836/How-Prince-Andrew-s-sex-abuser-friend-Jeffrey-Epstein-kept-list-nicknamed-Holy-Grail-great-good-Bill-Clinton-Tony-Blair-Mick-Jagger-Donald-Trump.html
Billionaire Pervert Jeffrey Epstein And His Famous Friends A Primer
archive.org/details/BillionairePervertJeffreyEpsteinAndHisFamousFriendsAPrimer1/page/n9/mode/2up
*lawrence krauss, Steven Pinker, Obama, Bloomberg, Trump, Naomi Campbell, Hillary Clinton, Kevin Spacey, Chris Tucker, Rothschilds, former member of charles Manson gang Nancy Pelosi,
Lawrence Summers, Bill Gates, Alec Baldwin, Oprah, Katie Couric, George Stephanopoulos, Prince Andrew, Kenneth Starr,
ADRENOCHROME 101, WALNUT SAUCE, HOLLYWOOD SICKO'S JONESING
ruclips.net/video/ZMLCF3ynxgk/видео.html
imgur.com/Al0vGo0
freebeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/bloomberg-weinstein.jpg
cdn.newspunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/weinstein-epstein.jpg
pbs.twimg.com/media/D3ywNHvW4AAquAT.jpg
img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/59e353052d0000971730a55b.jpeg?cache=mqJUUaVcQm&ops=1200_630
freebeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/bloomberg-weinstein-736x529.jpg
us.v-cdn.net/5021252/uploads/editor/6t/ddhauycct47l.png
external-preview.redd.it/1EDKVj9ZIO87ijRgipOpdt8i80_ni7dpfpivesrkevk.jpg?width=1024&auto=webp&s=1586ea878d02fafb8d5c927c38be4d44d0907a81
www.small-screen.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/jeffrey-epstein-with-bill-clinton.jpg
eurolandexperience.files.wordpress.com/2019/10/jeffrey-epstein-with-bill-gates.jpg
external-preview.redd.it/vaOjhnEj0odCffzeYZ1ApNy4HG8TfeBdpERPMLd-jbg.jpg?auto=webp&s=98e643781001593950096629168cbb7c4018bbd8
1.bp.blogspot.com/-hXn8yAFXBK8/VupXUSk2RGI/AAAAAAAATEw/Bylb-UETfbkOOLu9ufbsaxnZ-VKDlz1oQ/s320/trump-clinton.jpg
bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/tulsaworld.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/9/08/9088c8ae-50fe-5664-81e3-689d037255ac/5d542acda7aea.preview.jpg?crop=1821%2C1024%2C0%2C56&resize=1120%2C630&order=crop%2Cresize
vashiva.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/fact5-slider-2.jpg
Head of the Snake - Wexner, Maxwell’s, Mossad & Mega Group Exposed
ruclips.net/video/dzDWA9_mUgc/видео.html
Blackstone Vault
Epstein files
www.blackstoneintel.com/epstein
Ted Gunderson - Former FBI Chief Exposes 'Illuminati' (disturbing content)
ruclips.net/video/EqjNa-Jpsf0/видео.html
TED GUNDERSON CHRONICLES
ruclips.net/video/4JJmXElmo8w/видео.html
No Questions Asked - How the British Establishment hide child abuse
ruclips.net/video/j82JVnRDI4k/видео.html
The Monarchy British VIP pedophile ring for decades
ruclips.net/video/hg0PVBYcQMc/видео.html
How The British State Protects Paedophiles
ruclips.net/video/penL6zLuQGE/видео.html
Britain’s Pedophilia ELITE… [EXPOSED] 2018 Documentary
ruclips.net/video/4KkD_k_4_lM/видео.html
Satanists & Pedophiles Run The World
ruclips.net/video/IgP88z6h-Zk/видео.html
THE STRANGE STORY OF THE QUEEN AND THE CHILDREN WHO ‘DISAPPEARED’
indianinthemachine.wordpress.com/2011/03/01/the-strange-story-of-the-queen-and-the-children-who-disappeared-from-native-residential-schools/
Queen Elizabeth and 10 Missing Children Truth With Trishaly
ruclips.net/video/Qnk23kcSxKA/видео.html
Queen Elizabeth Found Guilty in Missing Children Case
nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/2016/02/queen-elizabeth-found-guilty-in-missing.html
Mass graves of Mohawk children have been uncovered by ground-penetrating radar at the Mohawk Institute,
a residential school for Mohawk operated by the Church of England and the Vatican before its closure in 1970.
www.bibliotecapleyades.net/vatican/esp_vatican69.htm
THE QUEEN AND MISSING KIDS
aangirfan.blogspot.com/2011/03/queen-and-missing-kids.html
Proof Queen Elizabeth killed kids in Canada!
ruclips.net/video/ij5R5xr5HEk/видео.html
No justice for Epstein accusers as Queen denies ties - Galloway
ruclips.net/video/KE5uIWm_8ho/видео.html
The Origins of Jeffrey Epstein | 1971
ruclips.net/video/qd9Gbh-u-VM/видео.html
Fall of the Cabal Revelations: Meet the Scherffs [Bush] + Meet the Hitlers [Obama] - Robert Potter
ruclips.net/video/5Sdi2zN9TM4/видео.html
You can download the book for free here
www.dropbox.com/s/92kitdf2t1077o8/For%20free%20in%20booksVeil_of_Invisibility.pdf.zip?dl=0&file_subpath=%2FFor+free+in+booksVeil_of_Invisibility.pdf
Meet The Scherffs
www.dtss.us/blog/meet-the-scherffs/
Is George H.W. Bush Really Prescott Bush's Son?
Or Is He The Son Of Inventor Nikola Tesla's German-Born Accountant, George H. Scherff, Sr.?
rense.com/general69/prescc.htm
This satanic blackmailing has been going on for a long time now =
The Fatty Arbuckle Scandal
www.neatorama.com/2017/04/14/The-Fatty-Arbuckle-Scandal/
George Washington and his "White Slaves" / Indentured in the Mt Vernon Plantation / Truth
ruclips.net/video/E-QxWjPeg3A/видео.html
From Indigenous American to African American // Meet The Original People of The America's
ruclips.net/video/X774BnT05SQ/видео.html
White Servitude // Indentured in the Penal Colonies of America / The True Middle Passage
youtu.be/XExqydi7
The Truth about Abraham Lincoln // The Runaway Indentured Servant Colored Man
ruclips.net/video/QKtkZDHSfXw/видео.html
White Servitude & Free Negro Masters // The Invention of the White Race/Indentured Servitude
ruclips.net/video/831JPi_4hYk/видео.html
White Servitude // Convicts, Political & Religious Prisoners / Hutchison-Lambert Genealogy
ruclips.net/video/lBjAKx2-MNY/видео.html
White Servitude & Free Negro Masters // The Untold truth of American Slavery / Indentured Service
ruclips.net/video/k8gkiHQyDrc/видео.html
Untold Ancient American Truth // Mayach/Turtle/First/Maya/Mu/Mother/Atlantis/Egypt/Amazon
ruclips.net/video/fA_0TycA3tw/видео.html
And Then They Came for the Books...
ruclips.net/video/Z_fGfjZrPfM/видео.html
Lawrence Krauss defines what a good interviewer is: Somebody who ask questions and shuts up once the interviewee starts speaking.
But most importantly, also contributes with own qualified arguments, so that it becomes a real live dialogue. Just reading loud questions is not good interviewing.
Well said / makes The Hannity elk look like preschoolers
@@Jimyblues They are preschoolers.
I had a feeling that he wasn't even listening. :)
So right! I hate interviewers who interrupt the second they don't like what the person is saying! Many cable news desk jockeys do that today!
The opening introduction brought tears to my eyes. I've been following Noam for decades and he never disappoints even if the subject matter may be disturbing.
Very well worth the extra time. ❤
As someone who loves learning and the pursuit of knowledge, and who has an appreciation of critical thinking, I highly value Chomsky's take on deflating your ability to orate efficaciously in order that people value what you say, and not just how you say it. At the same time, your burden is passing along the idea of critical thinking. And if the benefactor doesnt already possess, then you have to be oratorically persuasive. It like the epitome of irony. I love the whole landscape painted by these two artists, and crave more of it.
Professor Chomsky, a true intellectual and wonderful human being
who is an untrue intellectual?
@@bryanpinto4051 Have you never heard of sophistry?
ruclips.net/user/shortsjvs2FZlJguQ👈🏻👈🏻😐😐🤔🤔
I am an admitted Chomskyite! Many years of study, observation and deep thought are always evident when he speaks! We need him around in this day and age, especially!
🙏❤️✌️🌎🌞🌻🦋🎶🎼🌈❤️🙏
What we see in intellectuals like Noam. It is easy to read Noam as a creature. Noam lays it all out with not his grand puzzle. We just seen all the missing pieces. Noam and Marx act superior, smart material linguistics that mean nothing. It is all internal constructed nonsense of made up linguistics. Nothing applies to the real world nor has it been applied in reality! All the
fantasies of Marx and Noam. Are monuments to failure. That is are main problem with intellectuals! It is great to have big creative fun wild thinking . However, if you can not get it to work in the real world after 175 years. Better stop thinking and start testing on a small scale then improve on working applications. Your super big untested big ideas just end up killing people. Like this video points out. ruclips.net/video/UnkMA0l7Af8/видео.html
Noam's base-line soul and his books are based on big envy, anger and using big violence to obtain his untested contentment. Just like Marx. That is very easy to see. He covers it up with overly complex meaningless linguistics. None of his words are tested in reality. Call him on that fact and he will fall back into a corner. He is just a poet. Dreamers love mad poets.
I am an engineer. I am not great just one of millions in the world. If you want to make a bridge. Most of the time you base your idea on past bridges that worked. You refine the design based on geological tests. Wind tests, material testing, Finite Element Analysis testing. Live load testing, in-process construction testing ect. ect. Most engineers do not consider them self's intellectuals. nor do they like to be called intellectuals are all theory. An engineer is happy when he see's the mile long bridge across a bay transporting millions of cars and truck for many many years in safety. The Workers that build the bridge get the satisfaction of knowing they built that dang thing. These underlying applied realities to make something work do not exist in the minds of Noam, Marxists or most intellectuals.
@@TheConstitutionFirst Indeed. These are the thoughts of Thomas Sowell. He wrote a book about intellectuals and made these points
anybody watching this quarantined, and misses sitting in theater to listen to lectures and debates like this?
no
No. I hated school and dropped out of college. The rigidity was too much. But I listen to this sort of stuff while I drive, cook, lift weights etc. Sometimes I think I have some form of ADHD
... well I do! I agree with you and miss it a lot.
@@Creamy6oodness You might very well. During college, I had to smoke a cigarette each break to slow my brain down to be able to withstand the slow pace of the courses. I learned way more spending time in the library, studying all the books on a matter I could find, solving problems on my own.
But that's also where I believe Chomsky makes a mistake. Not everybody is built this way. Most of my fellow students were not interested in doing that huge intellectual effort. They were much more interested in getting knowledge poured into their heads like a liquid. Also, only a few of the professors were able to each me by just watching over my shoulder, telling me that there's another book I should read, or that what I was looking into might be connected to some other field I may want to look into, and just very discreetly guiding me, based on the huge knowledge they themselves had already accumulated, at the same time being humble about it.
If we'd rely on the few professors of this kind, and on the few students who are willing and able to learn this way, we'd still be in the middle ages, and modern science would be magic to most people.
@@Creamy6oodness maybe you are just an idiot :)
Absolutely brilliant wide-ranging discussion.
Be sure to watch part 2, the 45 minute Q&A follow-up.
Finally, the perfect remedy for my insomnia.
***** Heh...Chomsky whispering in an ASMR video....look out, Maria!
Raoul Borans Hahaha True
Esteban Nemo who do you mean when referring to ASMR? I'm racking my mind to try and work out who it is but my brain fails me, it's probably the lack of sleep and stress of other things causing me to have what I can only describe as a brain fart, thanks.
Do a search for "ASMR Maria" on RUclips.
Could you imagine a world in which Chomsky is celebrated in our culture as much as kim Kardashian
that would be a thing
No. No, I can't. Unless you say "our culture" meaning educated people who actually give a damn about this place.
It will never happen. America is full of anti-intellectuals.
yes. communism
Don’t say anything start doing from now on
This guys knowledge is astounding. The breadth and the depth
At this point, I don't know what is to come. But the intoduction to Noam Chomsky by Krauss is a great start. Thank you all involved in making this available here.
wrining this from october 2024. noam is speechless after a massive stroke but still alive and have been reportedly rehabilitating. his intellectual weight and contribution to the society are enormous. long live dr. chomsky. your voice is missed badly 💔
I might be the universe's biggest nerd, but when I first saw the title of this video and realized it was genuine I just about rolled around on the floor with delight.
Wait till a decent copy of the Rise of Skywalker gets uploaded into torrent cyberspace.
I got an email from him once and was afraid to touch my computer for fear it would fly away
What does it mean to just about roll around on the floor?
rolled around in your own shit
Marxist philosophy is just plain fun and inherently moral: This video Nails it!
ruclips.net/video/UnkMA0l7Af8/видео.html
Simply i can say i love NOAM CHOMSKY .
same here in germany
I’m sure he loves you too, nacho man.
@@freydenker6335 Same here. Another German.
Marxist philosophy is just plain fun and inherently moral: This video Nails it!
ruclips.net/video/UnkMA0l7Af8/видео.html
@@TheConstitutionFirst I like how you classified the Nazi's as socialist xdddd, v accurate
Two of my heroes! The master of physics and the master of language and morality! What a treat for us to be able to listen to these two great men.
Chomsky is one of the few great intellectuals who speak with grace and honestly 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Absolutely my favorite Chomsky talk. Its like an overall summary of his best work and ideas. All in under 2 hours.
Will Griffin Anytime you got an old athiest jew circuit speaker like Chomsky spinning yarns about everything under the sun except jewish usury caste system. You got an old jew shekeler...
My respect for L.Krauss skyrocketed.Brave man very brave and exactly what sort of people this age of humans needs,hopefully more of the bright people will speak up !not against america against the greed against injustice for all our sake
Let's not go into Krauss's character please; spoil the mood.
fool
@@dreamingrightnow1174 he loves to come across as a "Naughty boy" Krauss is a terrible nontalent - a disgrace to his field , and a "Assgrabber" - with a long lineup of young female students he just couldnt help himself from grabbing and being a total sexist jerkoff , who believe AYNYONE find his craterface and plumb style, attracting,-
@@MikkelGrumBovin Yeah, and don't even get me started on his Jeffrey Epstein adoration...
Is there some way to Keep this man , Chomsky, alive for another 150 years?...
we should freeze him.
if technological singularity happens, perhaps
Ask Kissinger.
By giving him a portion of our lives!
Apo Galiev It’s a load of crap. This book isn’t worth the media it’s propagated on. No one should waste their time even considering looking into it at all. Pure nonsense and dribble. Only the soft-minded could possibly take it seriously.
I was afraid all the comments here would be very earnest and intellectual. I'm so glad to see that, as with all youtube videos, it's mostly rants and insults.
@andi Levicky
...and sarcasm. lol.
You just added sarcasm to the list.
Aside form politics, can anyone tell me why is Chomsky so admired? I doubt that his followers understand his work on linguistics, so I suspect the admiration comes from Chomsky's political stance.
@@samerdrich5579 Not just his stance(s). John Kerry criticized Bush's war. Heck, Donald Trump used the mass-rejection, late arriving, of Bush's war, to attack Jeb so he couldn't win on the coattails of his younger brother.
Chomsky provides analysis, mostly factual, about US and Western violent interventions, by so called liberal intellectuals, and covert ops that became known.
@@gg_rider My point is proved, I said "asides from politics" and no one has been able to answer so far.
I thoroughly enjoyed that discussion. For me, the great joy of such gentle but deep discussion is available to me in my own home - I am at home in my chair but right with them. If I don't grasp a point being put forward I can stop, rewind and re approach. I can stop and think through what is being suggested or observed. How lucky are we, this generation who can observe and participate in so many debates and discussions. Chomsky is growing on me. Of course I am familiar with him but the internet allows us to pursue him throughout his life listening as he casts off pearls and thoughts over his shoulder.
Every time I hear Noam Chomsky speak, I am in awe of his evident intellect. He seems to easily express thoughts and concepts which, though very deep, appear to be obvious once they are spoken.
Pay my homage to you ,Noam👏. Your words and smiles, give the way to go to find the best we can!👏🙏The hope, no hopeless at all!
Excellent//thanks Lawrence for this great dialogue..
Chomsky is so soft-spoken, keeping his mic from feeding back was clearly an ongoing challenge to some engineer.
Brilliant ideas and these two guys are source of them.
Long life for you two to shed more light on our minds.
My new hobby is listening to science lectures while going to sleep.
How lucky are we to have such access to these discussions and debates with the academics of the times.
Thanks very much🤙
And i totally agree with the comments laurence is a remarkable moderator.
For some of us this may actually be the best way of learning, perhaps the new future of education for some….
Yeah it's great, I do the same thing. Also, Terrence McKenna lectures are great to listen to at bedtime. The Trialogue Series with Sheldrake and Abraham is really great also
Amazing to see these two fine men on a stage together. Chomsky still has his dry wit.
I don't recall see him giggle as much before either; endearing. Krauss has the wherewithal to pair with Noam, and challenge someone he has respect for. GREAT POST.
Okay, but can you say someone like Krauss with his sexual assault/harassment allegations a "fine" man? He's lucky to be on the stage with NC.
Oh, I just wish there was an audio engineer capable of getting the audio right for events like these.
Rude
That's just his voice, not the microphone.
Hey, maybe they should run his audio through garage band and filter it with auto tune.
The man is brilliant. Every time I listen to him I learn something at least somewhat mind-blowing.
This is the best discussion with Chomsky I 've ever seen or read. Thanks for sharing.
That has to be the most beautiful introduction I have ever heard.
"what's more obscene is that we don't talk about it" - on our part in genocide and war crimes.
"Man is born free and everywhere is in chains" a quote by Jean-Jacque Rousseau and is the correct quote.
1:27:32 "It happens because we're supporting it." That statement could not be more correct.
Every fault in our society, is due to society, not individuals.
Each individual should take personal responsibility, so our systems put in place can function successfully.
Prof. Noam Chomsky - what a fascinating and remarkable intellect !!!
A million thanks to Lawrence Krauss for this extraordinary dialogue with one of the most admirable, brilliant, and advanced humanists ever!!
Aaqaaaaaaqaqqaaqaaaaqaqaaaqqqaqqaqqqaaaaaaaaaaqaqqaaaqqaqaqaqaaqqaqqqqqaqqqqaqaqaqqaqaqqaqqaqaqqqaqqqqqaqaqaqqqqaqaqqqqqaaqaqqaqaaqqqqqqqaqaaqqqqqaqqqqqqqqqaqqqqqqqqaaqaaqqaaaqaaqqaqaqqqaqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqaqqqaqqqaqqaaqqqqqaqqqaqqaqqqqqqqaqqqqqqqqqqqaeaqaqaqaaaqqqqqqqqqqqqrrrrtt. Bdzzsaa,,
James Talley
Hey big respect to the people involved in putting a screen up for people who have hearing disabilities
Thank You !!! for this amazing interview
I feel that my mind just got an overdose of logic and coherent thoughts
very refreshing
What we see in intellectuals like Noam. It is easy to read Noam as a creature. Noam lays it all out with not his grand puzzle. We just seen all the missing pieces. Noam and Marx act superior, smart material linguistics that mean nothing. It is all internal constructed nonsense of made up linguistics. Nothing applies to the real world nor has it been applied in reality! All the
fantasies of Marx and Noam. Are monuments to failure. That is are main problem with intellectuals! It is great to have big creative fun wild thinking . However, if you can not get it to work in the real world after 175 years. Better stop thinking and start testing on a small scale then improve on working applications. Your super big untested big ideas just end up killing people. Like this video points out. ruclips.net/video/UnkMA0l7Af8/видео.html
Noam's base-line soul and his books are based on big envy, anger and using big violence to obtain his untested contentment. Just like Marx. That is very easy to see. He covers it up with overly complex meaningless linguistics. None of his words are tested in reality. Call him on that fact and he will fall back into a corner. He is just a poet. Dreamers love mad poets.
I am an engineer. I am not great just one of millions in the world. If you want to make a bridge. Most of the time you base your idea on past bridges that worked. You refine the design based on geological tests. Wind tests, material testing, Finite Element Analysis testing. Live load testing, in-process construction testing ect. ect. Most engineers do not consider them self's intellectuals. nor do they like to be called intellectuals are all theory. An engineer is happy when he see's the mile long bridge across a bay transporting millions of cars and truck for many many years in safety. The Workers that build the bridge get the satisfaction of knowing they built that dang thing. These underlying applied realities to make something work do not exist in the minds of Noam, Marxists or most intellectuals.
Lower the gain on the sound desk and kill the feedback or find the frequency and lower it!!!
massive dissapointment with the sound for the first 45 minutes... I mean seriously, on THIS show? Whoever was working the sound should be ashamed professionally.
Robert Ransley There must be some standard settings for the two mics here in this theatre, not a complex arrangement !
AsFewFalseThingsAsPossible I think the problem mighta been that they had the levels turned up because Chomsky speaks so softly, would that have caused the feedback?
How can no one running sound at a university think about throwing an EQ on the mic?
Exactly, the trouble starts when Chomsky comes out, he speaks so softly. Soundguys nightmare. But no excuse.
This was a great conversation. I wasn't aware that Noam was also interested in science because I have been living under a rock for a decade. He explains the connections between linguistics, behavioral science, and physics so concisely. Sometimes people think I am not paying attention because I seem to get lost in thought but in the truth I am just busying processing their words and picking apart their internal process. Which may stem from my years editing. I think the words people choose out of all the probabilities of word order are interesting. One just has to be careful not to jump to conclusions and to not make a defined judgement based on their interpretation of what those choices mean because there are always exceptions, lost in translations, and bias.
Im only passed Chomsky's introduction, and i already have the goose bumps !
Chomsky and Krauss? What the fuck?! I would have never imagined these two on stage together. This is going to be good!
how can he - he is too large...
A Skeptical Human * Apparently, Chomski was one of Krauss' professors.
I was surprised the universe didn’t explode when these two met.
Can you imagine twenty five minutes in still getting ringing from the sound person?! If you book Noam, book a sound person that can handle him.
"man was born free but lives everywhere in chains" was the quote, Lawrence
Same meaning...
A really, really productive and illuminating exchange. How nice to see how Krauss, the great cosmo-monologist, submits to the true discipline of interviewing, tapping into Chomsky's mind with the just the right questions, knowing when to defer, when to challenge.
He's not giving a physics lecture here, oddly enough... And may I ask just what the fuck he's supposed to do, being a cosmologist, but monologue on cosmology? That's his job...and I'd rather have my fingernails pulled off than listen to Chomsky for 2 more minutes, since even on his own subject he's soporific when he's not being inaccurate, or even downright bloodless.
To see the amount of truth and wisdom come from his mouth make me believe once more in humanity and the precise goal of being an intellectuals is to speak the truth , honesty so you can touch the souls of victims of war crimes and send condolences in defending them by telling the truth , thank you Naom chomosky from IRAQ , baghdad
Too bad about the sound problems at the beginning, they were somewhat distracting. If anyone is wondering, they get finally resolved around 26:50 mark when new microphones are brought in.
Other than that, I did enjoy watching this, although it was more of an interview than a dialogue. But I guess in this case that's okay. ;)
I love listening to Chomsky speak, such a deep intellectual old spirit
Out spoken intellect, how refreshing in this dark time
I have watched this 3 times now and im still fascinated.
ruclips.net/user/shortsjvs2FZlJguQ👈🏻👈🏻👌👌
i am very lucky to be able to watch his discussion on this channel. I just want to underline his last statement that :
"we have to make a distinction here between individual rasionality and the institutional rasionality"
and his views on today's climate change issue:
"you don't have to be a climate scientist to understand this much about what's going on"
very thoughtful and enlightening. understanding his thoughts requires a clear thinking and understanding the context of the discussion.
may he always be given health. 🤲🙏🏼
So this is perhaps the most interesting thing I've ever seen on youtube!
Marxist philosophy is just plain fun and inherently moral: This video Nails it!
ruclips.net/video/UnkMA0l7Af8/видео.html
Such a great discussion. Thank you so much for capturing and uploading it. I was very pleasantly surprised when it showed up in my subscription feed. It is now depriving me from sleep though!
DEPRIVING?? It (or rather Chomsky) made me doze of even though I didn't want to.
Noam - most respectable living intellectual in the universe.
Found Noam through the movie "Captain Fantastic" one of my all time faves. This is amazing, thank you.
I'm glad I can actually hear Noam in this video. So often he seems to mumble and speak so softly that I have to turn the volume all the way up and quickly lower it whenever anyone else begins to speak.
This man's name strikes fear in the hearts of audio technicians everywhere! More feedback than a rock n roll show here!
Thanks so much for sharing this.
I love watching Krauss act towards Noam, the same way I act when watching Krauss!
Me tooooo
I am grateful to Professor Noam Chomsky for informing me of United States diplomat George Kennan decision in 1947 to allow war torn Europe and European settler colonizers to rebuild on the back of Africa. I appreciate all that he has done. Professor Noam Chomskys information enabled me to better understand my reality.
Love your lectures professor. By the way you should get the nobel prize. Thanks.
ruclips.net/user/shortsjvs2FZlJguQ👈🏻👈🏻✌✌
I was there! It was a great time.Origins dialogues are some of the coolest!
Lesson here is: dont go to ASU for sound production.
lack of knowledge expose armin nawabi
ruclips.net/video/6CgJuowLVrc/видео.html
It’s ASU. You go for the booze and the girls
There is not enough that I can say about Noam Chomsky that can trump the plaudits bestowed on him. This video was recently shot at ASU as part of a series hosted and led by Lawrence Krauss, himself not just a noted physicist, but a public intellectual as well. If you believe that there is another way for the world to revolve than the out of control spin set in motion by the current global and economic crisis, then you must avail yourself of this interview, done in two parts, the first of which is linked here. Chomsky is a "public intellectual", a term he deserves. However, he is not your average snooty, ten dollar word upper crust sort, and that is really part of what makes him different, and his thoughts accessible. He does not get enough credit for the manner in which he communicates, the attractiveness of his logic, and the common sense that his opinions reflect. If you are attracted to what he has to say, and you feel as I do about his style of rhetoric, I highly recommend that you encourage others with concerns about the future of the world we live in, to put aside their initial abhorrence of the word intellectual, and their hatred for elitism, and just listen for five minutes to what he has to say. Chomsky's words need to be proliferated far beyond the world of the already converted. He needs to be heard by the masses of people who are the power base on which change can evolve.
I really liked it that Krauss did this discussion. I bet Krauss has many followers who have never heard of Chomsky, so I'm glad he did it. And good that he didn't turned it into an endless discussion about religion.
I'll second your comments on both counts. Krauss, as a "star" of the ASU series, does a great job with his discussion approach to bringing out the ideas of those who sit in the chair next to him on stage. One admonition of course, and that is that he has guests on who he admires so there isn't a sense that you have to brace yourself hard for the antagonistic question that you think may be coming. After all, he's talking to a friend, and that friend has good, solid and meaningful things to say. So it just seems to flow with Krauss's approach. And yes, let us not put that threadbare discussion of religion on the docket. There are plenty of other opportunities to air out the scientists grievances against religion.
George Aponick
Christopher Hitchens on Chomsky:
'[Chomsky] has now been impeached by his own standards, since scrutiny of the evidence does not bear him out on Serbia or Afghanistan or Iraq. It didn't bear him out on Cambodia either, though he was never a "Holocaust denier" or anything like it. And he has, I think, ceased to be of any use to young people who might pardonably doubt the official story.'
'My quarrel with Chomsky goes back to the Balkan wars of the 1990s, where he more or less openly represented the "Serbian Socialist Party" (actually the national-socialist and expansionist dictatorship of Slobodan Milosevic) as the victim. Many of us are proud of having helped organize to prevent the slaughter and deportation of Europe's oldest and largest and most tolerant Muslim minority, in Bosnia-Herzegovina and in Kosovo. But at that time, when they were real, Chomsky wasn't apparently interested in Muslim grievances. He only became a voice for that when the Taliban and Al Qaeda needed to be represented in their turn as the victims of a "silent genocide" in Afghanistan. Let me put it like this, if a supposed scholar takes the Christian-Orthodox side when it is the aggressor, and then switches to taking the "Muslim" side when Muslims commit mass murder, I think that there is something very nasty going on. And yes, I don't think it is exaggerated to describe that nastiness as "anti-American" when the power that stops and punishes both aggressions is the United States … In some awful way, his regard for the underdog has mutated into support for mad dogs. This is not at all like watching the implosion of an obvious huckster and jerk like Michael Moore, who would have made a perfectly good Brownshirt populist. The collapse of Chomsky feels to me more like tragedy'
Matthew Singh-Dosanjh
Chomsky > Hitchens on every level.
Matthew Singh-Dosanjh
Thank you for the insight you presented quoting Christopher Hitchens who I also admire for the intellect and insight he displayed during his tragically shortened life. That said, nobody is perfect in their representations or perceptions about complex international issues. I certainly will follow up on this quote and research it in its larger context. There are a couple responses I'd like to present. First, Hitchens let me down when he evolved out of his socialist positions. He also disappointed me when he supported the criminal invasion of Iraq. He declared that we were somehow saving the Middle East from a savage dictator. I opposed the war from the beginning and wrote that it would be the disaster it turned out to be for all peoples of the area. I've not been to Iraq but I have been to the West Bank and I was appalled by the mistreatment of Arab Muslims at the hands of a government supported by the U.S. and I would then suppose, Christopher Hitchens. One other comment, and I suppose more of a question, and I would like to know, after following Chomsky, what is your opinion generally of Chomsky's views on the world we live in and the problems we face. I'm not presenting the question as a challenge, but rather an honest want of trying to understanding of your points of view.
I hope you are able to read this and respond.
Dear Shirley, I don't know who you are, but thank you for uploading this conversation.
This is just great thanks for posting - along with Hitchens Harris Dawkins when he’s not being exasperating, Bart Erdmann Bishop Spong these 2 are my faves and experiencing them together having a real dialogue just f in makes me happy . The perfect thing to watch after a bowl of Nightmare Cookie nugs!
Thank you for this much needed Scientific Discussion !
What we see in intellectuals like Noam. It is easy to read Noam as a creature. Noam lays it all out with not his grand puzzle. We just seen all the missing pieces. Noam and Marx act superior, smart material linguistics that mean nothing. It is all internal constructed nonsense of made up linguistics. Nothing applies to the real world nor has it been applied in reality! All the
fantasies of Marx and Noam. Are monuments to failure. That is are main problem with intellectuals! It is great to have big creative fun wild thinking . However, if you can not get it to work in the real world after 175 years. Better stop thinking and start testing on a small scale then improve on working applications. Your super big untested big ideas just end up killing people. Like this video points out. ruclips.net/video/UnkMA0l7Af8/видео.html
Noam's base-line soul and his books are based on big envy, anger and using big violence to obtain his untested contentment. Just like Marx. That is very easy to see. He covers it up with overly complex meaningless linguistics. None of his words are tested in reality. Call him on that fact and he will fall back into a corner. He is just a poet. Dreamers love mad poets.
I am an engineer. I am not great just one of millions in the world. If you want to make a bridge. Most of the time you base your idea on past bridges that worked. You refine the design based on geological tests. Wind tests, material testing, Finite Element Analysis testing. Live load testing, in-process construction testing ect. ect. Most engineers do not consider them self's intellectuals. nor do they like to be called intellectuals are all theory. An engineer is happy when he see's the mile long bridge across a bay transporting millions of cars and truck for many many years in safety. The Workers that build the bridge get the satisfaction of knowing they built that dang thing. These underlying applied realities to make something work do not exist in the minds of Noam, Marxists or most intellectuals.
Everyone should watch this discussion, every single person should know those issues.
On topics I know something about, like the Taliban, I take what Chomsky says with a grain of salt. The Taliban were created by the Pakistani ISI. Taliban religious ideology, influenced heavily by Deobandi and so-called Wahabi dogma, is foreign to Afghans as well. The Taliban also destroyed the tribal system of consensus and eliminated the traditional role of women in Afghan society. The Taliban never controlled all of Afghanistan, either. (Their counterparts, The Northern Alliance eventually drove them out of Kabul, not US troops) The Taliban gave open support to bin Laden to set up terrorist training camps in Afghanistan, knowing full well UBL's enmity towards the West and the US. And then there is their horrible human rights record, and the destruction of the Bamiyan Buddhas. Does anyone really think the Taliban would have been fair-minded and reasonable negotiators? Yet in spite of all this, Chomsky reacts in mock puzzlement at the US not taking their "offer" to turn over bin Laden seriously. As if the Taliban had the political or moral authority or will to do such a thing. I follow Chomsky, but cannot agree with him here. His one-size-fits-all argument about the US being the progenitor of every conflict in the world comes off as a default response.
Esteban Nemo Where did Chomsky state that the US was the progenitor of every conflict in the world?
Esteban Nemo Condemning U.S. attack on Afghanistan in 2001 is like condemning U.S. attack on France in 1944. Some people have a view that if U.S. intervenes in something, everything that follows is their fault. If the U.S. does not intervene (like in Rwanda) then everything also is their fault. Some actually blame U.S: on what ISIS does.
***** "Condemning U.S. attack on Afghanistan in 2001 is like condemning U.S. attack on France in 1944."
It's really not. At all. You could make a case that the US invasion of Normandy was justified. You cannot make the same case with the US invasion of Afghanistan, which was totally unjustified.
Well, it's an interesting analogy (though not one I would have made) and I think there are parallels, but really, it was the Northern Alliance, the Afghans themselves, that overthrew the Taliban, not US troops. America deployed limited special forces during the invasion and provided the Northern Alliance with air support and artillery. But getting back to the WW2 analogy, in a sense Afghanistan was liberated during the 2001 invasion as France was back during D-Day. At least we can say 15 million Afghans were liberated that day- the female population.
+Adam Watson Provide an argument for "totally unjustified", because you're just making assertions and nothing more.
Noam Chomsky responded to an email I sent and then again to another. He was kind and clear and it was awesome!
Thanks so much Chomsky and Krauss for this great Project by understanding , culture, creativity.......thanks! 💮☎️🎋🌻🧭
Lawrence needs a shirt that says "we'll get to that" lol
:D
he needs a shirt that says "Pedophile conman"
@@MikkelGrumBovin self project much?
Fantastic! Thank you for sharing.
What I would do to be in that room with these amazing intellectuals!
Here’s a novel idea, QUESTION them.
I bet the sound people will wake up in cold sweats for the rest of their lives. Love this wonderful chat. Cheers.
So much respect from a Krauss to Noam, very touching.
Chomsky's point about leaving out theatrics in speech is something I've always believed in. If you're trying to teach, leave any charisma or eloquence out of it. These are nothing more but emotional appeals. That isn't teaching, it's manipulating.
Rather ironic he would say that. It's rather clear that he uses a great deal of theatrics, charisma and appeal to peoples emotions, to make his point. I doubt he lacks the self awareness to see this.
Ian Escobar I disagree. I recently had the most boring lectures with an old professor who was pretty much talking to himself about theory of literature (my kinda thing) with monotone voice and no "theathre" and I literally remember nothing. I was sleeping. But maybe he wasn't just good in verbalizing his thoughts and then a very energetic, quick, intense and fun lectures with another professor about cognitive and generative grammar (not my kinda thing, but not anymore) and I was so exited about this topic. I think you need to find a nice balance between not being "too much" and being boring to death.
Obviously you have never seen Richard Feynman teaching.
Ian Escobar : Preacher tactics, indeed!
Me too, when I started to listen to Chomsky, it was really painful, cuz I was used to listen to charismatic speakers like Hitchens. But as time went on, I have learned so much more than I ever could. I learned to actually get interested in the words and the subject, and not the speaker. Listening to Chomsky speak, it's like listening him reading a book.
“We’ll get to that.” Did he? Did I miss it? Okay! I’ll watch the second part.
To know within yourself before knowing any others! We are human beings!
One of the greatest videos on RUclips.
ruclips.net/user/shortsjvs2FZlJguQ👈🏻👈🏻🤔🤔
Boundless appreciation to the provider of this brilliant, Homeric interview. To borrow from Shakespeare, we'll
never see Chomsky's like again.
As a Canadian, I think the political slogan for the United States should be "Make America Smart Again". I think that Noam and Lawrence would agree with me.
Make America Think Harder, MATH, was Andrew Yang's slogan
Just once would be nice
It's amazing (or self-evident) that intellectuals like these two guys are never an important part of the political "process". Noam Chomsky has written 100+ books on the subject, and is roundly criticized and/or dismissed when the forum is political. If intellect and open-mindedness became an important part of our public discourse, then an AMAZING culture could be realized in the USA. Everyone is so busy with "one-upmanship" and how much fucking MONEY can you earn, that being a thinking human being doesn't matter anymore. This sort of interview/debate/lecture CONVERSATION should be mandatory viewing for everyone who is registered to vote. We might be able to weed out the scum that don't deserve an elected "office". If you can't comprehend what great minds are talking about, then you don't HAVE a great mind and shouldn't be able to LEAD what you can't follow.
I'm 58 and I remember that, in high-school, a solid 50% of all kids (and their parents) believed that reading, learning, knowledge, science, art, and intellectualism in general, was decidedly "uncool". These people never changed their attitudes, they still believe "thinking" is uncool, but they back candidates, in a cult of personality fashion, and vote.
@@charleswettish8701 I'm 56, and pleasantly surprised that you replied to something I posted 7 years ago. Thanks.
@@mad_cat_1stHonestly, I hadn't noticed the date, but I certainly would have replied anyway. In the intervening years, we've seen how correct you were, 7 years ago. :)
Thank you for this “combo presentation”
Its amazing that the huge ego of Krauss let any space for Dr.Noam to manoeuvre. Still, amazing having him share his thoughts and wisdom.
"huge ego of Krauss"?
True, I too would have a huge ego if I made some of the most important discoveries, and wrote some of the most important literature, on Astrophysics.
But on what planet do you ground this insult? Seriously, I have never heard Krauss step out of line on any issue I've heard him speak about (except not being on board sending people to mars).
+ConnorJohn I've seen many other interventions by L.K., and a huge ego is always present among often a condescending tone towards others he share stage with, and keep in mind that normally those who share stage with L.K. are also great scholars or scientists.
Nevertheless, my comment does not become an insult just cause you decide so, fortunately. Its merely a descriptiin of whatis observed, and I believe even L.K. admits of it. It not the first time after watching him I observe and comment on his ego, though its true that in previous comments I often also continue by highlighting that he has gain the right to inflate his ego by merit.
In this particular video, the contrast is very appreciable when the humility of N.C. is put next to him.
+Osman Yousaf I agree that Kraus is a bit overbearing and pompous. It's also interesting how he tends to smile when talking about terrible things. I think these are mostly superficial flaws though; his ASU Origins Project is one of the only things to make Phoenix worth visiting.
He worked incredibly hard!! I'm not saying he doesn't have an ego, but just as any event host, he is guiding Noam, who tends to speak a long time and get into parenthesis and side comments, I love Noam, but Krauss had a tim limit, which he went over, he had a huge agenda connected to a lot of things that he rightly considers vital, like terrorism caused by us, climate change, Israel occupation, how religious dogmatism helps to exacerbate many political issues, etc. He's corky and funny, sometimes trying to find himself with his read shoes or snickers, or hats and other accoutrements, he has an agenda, etc but I don't perceive him to have a huge ego, he can be very humble, he is idealistic, he wishes to do something about the problems we face, and in fact he was incredibly reverent and respectful, he wanted to cover as much as possible much material Noam wrote about, the thing is Noam needs 2 events at least, he has covered so much material during his lifetime. Krauss was probably planning to over Noam's change from linguist to what motivated him to change with more time, and that didn't really happened! Let's appreciate people's efforts before we trash them!
+Malu Ribeiro Sorry you had the feeling I was trashing K. efforts, but its simply not the case.
Also, Noam is well known for being a critic of short time format interviews, everyone knows this. He believes that elaborated answers are the only worthy answers, specially for such complex topics as the once you have mention.
I saw the names "Chomsky" and "Krauss" and said YEAH!!!
My click finger is faster than your's...just Chomsky and clicked already😀
🙋🏻same!
I'm guessing they didn't have a union sound man on this shoot. Holy shit, what an amateur job on audio.
How did it feel when your girl Tulsi endorsed Biden?
A big fault with many RUclips videos. Couldn’t RUclips develop some algorithm to modulate soundto a a standard level?
Commie
I completely agree. There are multiple rings, build ups and actual fucking feedback the whole fucking time.
@@thomashenderson5047 nontalent
i come to Chomsky vid for the discussion but i stay for the pseudo intellectual hate in the comments
james deroc 🤣
What a gay dork. Your a version of todays man. GAF
@@alanburke1302 Nice, you one-upped him by removing the 'Pseudo-intellectual' portion from your comment. You didn't even attempt to say something intelligent, just spewed hatred-fueled insults. Give yourself a nice firm pat on the back for me, you sure taught him what's what!..
lmao..Children these days..
Thanks for sharing these awsome videos with these great guys.
One of the most brilliant, open conversations I've had the pleasure to listen to. These 2 men sharing their intellectual prowess was such a pleasure to listen to.
After hearing on the "main stream" news that Texas is terrified the big bad gov. is coming to take their guns! To think, people like Ted Cruz were elected to the office of Senate just makes me ill. Why are we not getting men like this into our politics?
The closest thing is Bernie Sanders who speaks for people, not corporations.
I wonder if Noam knows the "woah" moments his listeners have, he doesnt seem to be schooling you. Hes always so humble like having a casual conversation lol
He's a linguist and expert communicator. I bet he does.
He reads almost every academic book printed. That keeps him pretty busy, I bet. The joke Krause made at the beginning. I had to read five books a night for a week, just to feel comfortable coming into this talk. That's the base line for a conversation, let alone keeping up with him. Look at those notes.