It took me a while to figure out that the more words I put in for the lyrics the song was almost always faster no matter if I told it I wanted a ballad, love song, slow...whatever. Makes complete sense now but...oh well. I then tried putting in only a single verse and much of the time I got a song with a slower tempo. I am planning to try the chorus-first approach. It seems like a great idea: If the chorus falls flat then the song will be terrible.
Considering I see it already, should be fine. I'm wondering if it's because of all of the emoji's you use? Maybe YT sees a certain threshold and deems it a fake post?
@@shadyendeavor ... I wish that was the case, but we need to save these convos for email. OK, glad to see it remains, so will come back in a bit and do my usual brutal break down of your gross errors and poor tech skills 😾
It's funny (by funny, I mean really F'd up) The more I see how impressive this tech is, the more saddened I am for music lovers. There will still be those who are garage bands and would be willing to bet that there will be far more highly talented ones. What we will see is the greater reduction of major labels and an explosion of many thousands of basement studios and a vastly reduced number of live venues. Gone will be the days of filling MSG, as Zeppelin used to do 3 straight nights. We will see a rise of small clubs of no more than 50 people and probably not even have alcohol licenses. Music will still be in demand, but will see a complete separation between what is on the radio and what is trending on download sites. It is gonna be a crazy time in music, as all this gets sorted out, because the days of boy / girl bands with 8 songwriters are gone and in steps one guy with insane tech skills creating an entire band with history and tour photos in a couple days time.
As with most AI, this is sort of true. Most all of it takes a lot more work than what people think it does. Yes, you can put in your prompt for whatever platform you are using and you'll usually get something pretty cool back. But that doesn't mean that you will get what you wanted. Or anywhere close to what you envisioned. This is definitely the case with music. I still created my own lyrics for this reason alone. What ChatGPT and Claude spit out was never anywhere near what I would have liked. They're good as a tool to give you some ideas, but if you rely on them for the entirety of the writing, you'd be lucky to get Ariana Grande or Justin Bieber quality levels. We're still waaaayyy off from creating Bohemian Rhapsody. Again, that's just the lyrics. Now imagine that with the music, with every single instrument, the timing, the beat, the harmonies, the quality of the voices, the melding of everything together. It's all guesswork by the algorithm that won't come close to your imagination anytime soon. And to get it at all close, it takes a lot of work and ingenuity other than just putting in a simple prompt. I think I kind of disagree on the whole concert venue thing though. Concerts seem more popular than ever now. And I see the rise of them growing. I think the idea of the smaller venues will happen in addition to what's going on now. It's more a question of if there are good new bands continuing to come out that are worth seeing as the older bands won't be able to play forever. Except Keith Richards. He'll go on forever. People will still want the shared experiences. Real, in person, tangible experiences. (Not talking about the weak people that will give up their lives for virtual reality once it's truly available)
WARNING; nothing created on Udio can be copyrighted, so it can’t be used commercially…..do not waste your time if you’re professional…..but perfect tool for end users…..
Not true. Only partially. Pretty much anything created with strictly AI (video, audio, imagery) cannot be copyrighted, correct, so far. But as far as Udio goes, it absolutely CAN be used commercially. "Section 6.3: You can use your own output for commercial purposes, subject to compliance with the terms."
@@shadyendeavor ok, I invite you to read again my comment. You’re saying you can’t copyright nothing done with AI, then my comment is absolutely and completely true and not partially, because you can use professionally something you can’t copyright. And let me go even deeper, we made a feature film completely done with AI, music and image, 2 hours long. We licensed to one of the biggest studios here in LA, but we had a trigger clause, that the license takes place only if we could get copyright on the film. The copyright office received the film in January, and las Friday rendered a verdict, refusing to copyright the movie in a very long letter….too bad and for us is game over regarding AI, and it’s also the reason why Sora is not releasing the product. Anyways, it is what it is….
I think anyone wanting to know the legalities involved should take a look at this video posted by a person claiming to be a music attorney: ruclips.net/video/gkKdxnoPI58/видео.htmlsi=mkp4U8gmOStX7QzG. She goes into great detail about the terms of service for Udio.
It took me a while to figure out that the more words I put in for the lyrics the song was almost always faster no matter if I told it I wanted a ballad, love song, slow...whatever. Makes complete sense now but...oh well. I then tried putting in only a single verse and much of the time I got a song with a slower tempo. I am planning to try the chorus-first approach. It seems like a great idea: If the chorus falls flat then the song will be terrible.
Comment test
[will come back later to see if survived]
Considering I see it already, should be fine.
I'm wondering if it's because of all of the emoji's you use? Maybe YT sees a certain threshold and deems it a fake post?
@@shadyendeavor ... I wish that was the case, but we need to save these convos for email. OK, glad to see it remains, so will come back in a bit and do my usual brutal break down of your gross errors and poor tech skills 😾
@@NinjaKittyBonks i r nub, pleez halp
@@shadyendeavor ... no worries... The Kitty will school ya 😎
It's funny (by funny, I mean really F'd up) The more I see how impressive this tech is, the more saddened I am for music lovers. There will still be those who are garage bands and would be willing to bet that there will be far more highly talented ones. What we will see is the greater reduction of major labels and an explosion of many thousands of basement studios and a vastly reduced number of live venues. Gone will be the days of filling MSG, as Zeppelin used to do 3 straight nights. We will see a rise of small clubs of no more than 50 people and probably not even have alcohol licenses. Music will still be in demand, but will see a complete separation between what is on the radio and what is trending on download sites. It is gonna be a crazy time in music, as all this gets sorted out, because the days of boy / girl bands with 8 songwriters are gone and in steps one guy with insane tech skills creating an entire band with history and tour photos in a couple days time.
As with most AI, this is sort of true. Most all of it takes a lot more work than what people think it does. Yes, you can put in your prompt for whatever platform you are using and you'll usually get something pretty cool back. But that doesn't mean that you will get what you wanted. Or anywhere close to what you envisioned. This is definitely the case with music. I still created my own lyrics for this reason alone. What ChatGPT and Claude spit out was never anywhere near what I would have liked. They're good as a tool to give you some ideas, but if you rely on them for the entirety of the writing, you'd be lucky to get Ariana Grande or Justin Bieber quality levels. We're still waaaayyy off from creating Bohemian Rhapsody. Again, that's just the lyrics. Now imagine that with the music, with every single instrument, the timing, the beat, the harmonies, the quality of the voices, the melding of everything together. It's all guesswork by the algorithm that won't come close to your imagination anytime soon. And to get it at all close, it takes a lot of work and ingenuity other than just putting in a simple prompt.
I think I kind of disagree on the whole concert venue thing though. Concerts seem more popular than ever now. And I see the rise of them growing. I think the idea of the smaller venues will happen in addition to what's going on now. It's more a question of if there are good new bands continuing to come out that are worth seeing as the older bands won't be able to play forever. Except Keith Richards. He'll go on forever.
People will still want the shared experiences. Real, in person, tangible experiences. (Not talking about the weak people that will give up their lives for virtual reality once it's truly available)
WARNING; nothing created on Udio can be copyrighted, so it can’t be used commercially…..do not waste your time if you’re professional…..but perfect tool for end users…..
Not true. Only partially. Pretty much anything created with strictly AI (video, audio, imagery) cannot be copyrighted, correct, so far. But as far as Udio goes, it absolutely CAN be used commercially.
"Section 6.3: You can use your own output for commercial purposes, subject to compliance with the terms."
@@shadyendeavor ok, I invite you to read again my comment. You’re saying you can’t copyright nothing done with AI, then my comment is absolutely and completely true and not partially, because you can use professionally something you can’t copyright. And let me go even deeper, we made a feature film completely done with AI, music and image, 2 hours long. We licensed to one of the biggest studios here in LA, but we had a trigger clause, that the license takes place only if we could get copyright on the film. The copyright office received the film in January, and las Friday rendered a verdict, refusing to copyright the movie in a very long letter….too bad and for us is game over regarding AI, and it’s also the reason why Sora is not releasing the product. Anyways, it is what it is….
I think anyone wanting to know the legalities involved should take a look at this video posted by a person claiming to be a music attorney: ruclips.net/video/gkKdxnoPI58/видео.htmlsi=mkp4U8gmOStX7QzG. She goes into great detail about the terms of service for Udio.