I’ve had an LG front load washer since 2014. My mom wanted a top loader like this one but I wanted a front loader. We’ve decided that we will get a top loader when the front loader goes out. The front loader is nice because it uses less water but we are tired of bending over to get the clothes out. I’m glad this top loader uses less water.
Perfect video. I bought the 7100 LG last Summer and made the mistake of exchanging it for a re-used Amana, then to Samsung. The LG machine spins so much faster and longer on the Quick/Speed Wash cycle than the Samsung. I spoke with Samsung about why the tub stops spinning for 30 seconds in the middle of each final spin cycle, where LG spins all thwme way until the end. Samsung said "You cannot compare our products with other brand names." The LG machine is much quieter. The drain pump isn't on Steady like Samsung. And the LG machine will occasionally do a Spray Rinse to save water after the Wash cycle.
We consumers seem to have pretty low standards now for what makes a "good" washing machine now. Some of us are old enough to remember washing machines that actually thoroughly washed and rinsed clothes.
Yes!!! A proper agitator top loader that fills with water, or an older-style front loader that also uses enough water, will thoroughly agitate every square inch of clothing in the drum repeatedly over the course of the cycle. These impeller washers, even when filled with extra water, cannot generate sufficient turnover and agitation. Terrible waste materials and water, despite being "HE."
@@ArmandConiglio-b3h. You feel that way because you don't realize what you are looking at here. This is actually great wash action for an HE impeller large capacity top loading washer
My mom has one of these machines and seems to like it. Having had front loaders for 30 years, I don't really understand how this machine can clean the clothes. When I have washed my clothes in her washer, the rinse doesn't seem as thorough as in my front loader, but the clothes do some out clean, but smelling much more of detergent (we use the same brand of detergent).
I've used these "HE top loaders" before, and they were brutal. Didn't get my clothes clean at all, even with the water plus setting! It would make sense if it filled up 2-3x more than the level of clothes to allow room for them to be washed in, but these ones don't. I'd rather get an old/used dual action top loader over these HE ones any day. I currently have a front loader, and it washes really well. Thankfully, on the casual/perm. press cycle, it fills up more, and so the clothes can get cleaner.
If you want more water press and hold extra rinse for three seconds and you can keep doing that over and over and over again until the tub is full of water
This washer actually has a dedicated button for that, labelled "Water Plus". Ive found it to be very useful. This time i let it run on extra low water for the camera and because i was curious how well it would perform. Turns out, it works great with this little water!
I think WaveForce was contributing to the explode-on-spin cycle syndrome the early models were experiencing, causing massive recalls , so they scrapped the design.
It does. It cleans fine for how much water it uses as I've discovered. The water plus feature is nice for bulky items and sheets I've found since I dislike the bedding cycle.
@@petermaz701 I've found absolutely no rollover in the cycle. It seems to use far too much water which causes the machine to have no friction with the clothes and be unable to turn them over.
@@nhrawashervideos6567 You’re right I noticed that with a lot of the videos that I watched online the wash plate washers have a hard time when they’re filled all the way up with water and large loads.
They surely must have updated the control logic in the 2 years since this was posted. No offense, but there is no way I would think my clothes are clean after watching this. Not even close. I ordered an LG because the ratings are so good. The newer models must work differently. That extra fill-up option was needed badly.
The LG machines are prolly the best top load high efficiency machines you can buy today, but in my opinion. Ofc this machine seems to be working well. Stay away, get a good quality front loading machine. Or my personal favorite, the classic direct drive!! I’ve had experience wit everything, high efficiency General Electric top loader to a direct drive, a Samsung front loader and now back to a Kenmore elite direct drive! And yes the Samsung and GE did ok.. the direct drives are king for performance and durability. We don’t pay for water, having a well. So water usage is the least of my concern, it’s performance!!!!
It is an issue. LG has tried to combat this, if you add too much laundry the washer will go into a reduced power mode called motor protection mode. It sacrifices a ton of wash performance but it only does it if you overload it pretty good. That's why I try not to fill it full.
If this was the new turbo drum it would’ve been better but I’m NEVER going with lg ever again all of my 3 LG’s were all defective I ended up going with a whirlpool and I still have the whirlpool never buy LG buy Whirlpool
Quite amazing how this unit makes so many useless and unnecessary operations that don’t wash any fabric properly. I simply don’t understand why folks don’t buy efficient front loaders. More real action… much simply mechanical design and 40% water savings. Sad machine that clickety/clanks forever without really cleaning.🤡
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
LG has to make one of the best spray rinses for a top loader i've ever seen
I’ve had an LG front load washer since 2014. My mom wanted a top loader like this one but I wanted a front loader. We’ve decided that we will get a top loader when the front loader goes out. The front loader is nice because it uses less water but we are tired of bending over to get the clothes out. I’m glad this top loader uses less water.
Perfect video. I bought the 7100 LG last Summer and made the mistake of exchanging it for a re-used Amana, then to Samsung. The LG machine spins so much faster and longer on the Quick/Speed Wash cycle than the Samsung. I spoke with Samsung about why the tub stops spinning for 30 seconds in the middle of each final spin cycle, where LG spins all thwme way until the end. Samsung said "You cannot compare our products with other brand names." The LG machine is much quieter. The drain pump isn't on Steady like Samsung. And the LG machine will occasionally do a Spray Rinse to save water after the Wash cycle.
The LG WT7600 machine is one of my favorite washers out there!
thats my washer model , my model is a WT7600HKA
5:12 sensing
7:01 Wash
31:43 Rinse
38:20 spin
I just ordered the same one with the 5.5 tub and wanted to see it in action. Great rollover even with less water. Thanks for posting bro!
We consumers seem to have pretty low standards now for what makes a "good" washing machine now. Some of us are old enough to remember washing machines that actually thoroughly washed and rinsed clothes.
Yes!!! A proper agitator top loader that fills with water, or an older-style front loader that also uses enough water, will thoroughly agitate every square inch of clothing in the drum repeatedly over the course of the cycle. These impeller washers, even when filled with extra water, cannot generate sufficient turnover and agitation. Terrible waste materials and water, despite being "HE."
@@ArmandConiglio-b3h. You feel that way because you don't realize what you are looking at here. This is actually great wash action for an HE impeller large capacity top loading washer
BRUH
ARE
YOU
KIDDING
ME
YOU JUST DONE A WASHER CYCLE WITH DOOR OPEN
I CAN FINALLY PUT MARIO IN A WASHING MACHINE
My mom has one of these machines and seems to like it. Having had front loaders for 30 years, I don't really understand how this machine can clean the clothes. When I have washed my clothes in her washer, the rinse doesn't seem as thorough as in my front loader, but the clothes do some out clean, but smelling much more of detergent (we use the same brand of detergent).
I've used these "HE top loaders" before, and they were brutal. Didn't get my clothes clean at all, even with the water plus setting! It would make sense if it filled up 2-3x more than the level of clothes to allow room for them to be washed in, but these ones don't. I'd rather get an old/used dual action top loader over these HE ones any day. I currently have a front loader, and it washes really well. Thankfully, on the casual/perm. press cycle, it fills up more, and so the clothes can get cleaner.
i love LG and SHARP, they are very good brand!
If you want more water press and hold extra rinse for three seconds and you can keep doing that over and over and over again until the tub is full of water
This washer actually has a dedicated button for that, labelled "Water Plus". Ive found it to be very useful. This time i let it run on extra low water for the camera and because i was curious how well it would perform. Turns out, it works great with this little water!
I like LG washers. They're not bad machines.
That’s the best turbo wash ever
I think these machines with the locked drum are superior to the new TurboDrum models. I wish it had used a bit more water for this cycle, however.
It was rather low this go around. I let it go a little low just for the camera. Usually I'd use the water plus feature in this scenario.
I agree. We had one of the locked drum machines previously, and now we have a turbodrum 3d machine. It was much better
what do you mean by "locked drum?"
When the cycle finishes, do you flip the clothes over to do the other side?
😂
Yea right !! Them clothes aint cleaned.
That's why I like the old school direct drive washer's because they don't fuck around with your clothes like this machine
Are you sure that the clothes are getting cleaned in this machine, especially with not using enough water?
Clothes are not in . the water. The top is out pg the water level. Hiw can they be washed?
You cant tell me that this is better washing action than on the front load washing machines or top loads that have drums like front loads.
wheres the whater ?
I'd like to see the maytag centennial.
When it’s up to the WaveForce zone I didn’t see any rapid drum movements along powerful water jets
this washer doesn't have waveforce. the motion you're seeing is called compression
I never seen an lg use that little water
Wonder why they got rid of the waveforce part?
the 7700 models had it. I had no idea this one didn't till I already bought it lol. it still cleans great
I think WaveForce was contributing to the explode-on-spin cycle syndrome the early models were experiencing, causing massive recalls , so they scrapped the design.
I was surprised to see how little water it used. I expected the LG to use just a bit more. Does this model have the water plus feature?
It does. It cleans fine for how much water it uses as I've discovered. The water plus feature is nice for bulky items and sheets I've found since I dislike the bedding cycle.
It's also nice because you can use the feature repeatedly. You can make it fill full if you really want.
@@nhrawashervideos6567 May I ask why you dislike the bedding cycle? My sister uses it all the time for her bedding and to let the tub fill up.
@@petermaz701 I've found absolutely no rollover in the cycle. It seems to use far too much water which causes the machine to have no friction with the clothes and be unable to turn them over.
@@nhrawashervideos6567 You’re right I noticed that with a lot of the videos that I watched online the wash plate washers have a hard time when they’re filled all the way up with water and large loads.
can you flim your lg wd100c sidekick
Sure!
why is the normal cycle 56 instead of 58?
Not sure. That's just how this unit was programmed. if you set it to cold with extra high spin I believe it extends it to 1:06
I have the same model but normal is 58.
@@TheAmtrakSpartan Interesting! I wonder if they changed it one of the manufacturing years
They surely must have updated the control logic in the 2 years since this was posted. No offense, but there is no way I would think my clothes are clean after watching this. Not even close. I ordered an LG because the ratings are so good. The newer models must work differently. That extra fill-up option was needed badly.
The LG machines are prolly the best top load high efficiency machines you can buy today, but in my opinion. Ofc this machine seems to be working well. Stay away, get a good quality front loading machine. Or my personal favorite, the classic direct drive!! I’ve had experience wit everything, high efficiency General Electric top loader to a direct drive, a Samsung front loader and now back to a Kenmore elite direct drive! And yes the Samsung and GE did ok.. the direct drives are king for performance and durability. We don’t pay for water, having a well. So water usage is the least of my concern, it’s performance!!!!
I prefer front loaders better then top loaders bc 1 they clean more effectively and 2 the spin speed is much higher then top loaders.
Most (if not all) LG top load washers are direct drive.
37:49
I hate how tiny the shaft for this massive washplate is… that tiny shaft can just snap at any time…
It is an issue. LG has tried to combat this, if you add too much laundry the washer will go into a reduced power mode called motor protection mode. It sacrifices a ton of wash performance but it only does it if you overload it pretty good. That's why I try not to fill it full.
WOW this looks terrible, how does it even clean the clothes when they don't get wet. The clothes never moved from the lace they were put
In my opinion it rolled them over nicely actually. Everything was wet however this was an extra low water wash.
Ikr
@@nhrawashervideos6567That's means it did the job, and that's all that should matter.
I've used multiple of these shitty impeller machines. They are only good for small loads, for bigger loads you simply need an agitator
@@LoganT547, Not true. I see great wash action here. You have to be smart to know how to use these machines
May save water, but don’t save time.
#PersilAllDay
THAT IS NOT ENOUGH WATER
JOKER WASHER 😂😂😂😂
покрутить, не значит постирать..
аУу.. 21-ый век и уже за окном..
If this was the new turbo drum it would’ve been better but I’m NEVER going with lg ever again all of my 3 LG’s were all defective I ended up going with a whirlpool and I still have the whirlpool never buy LG buy Whirlpool
horrible
I hate LG. I will never buy this product ever again.
Some to most of these top load modern washers are a GARBAGE
Quite amazing how this unit makes so many useless and unnecessary operations that don’t wash any fabric properly. I simply don’t understand why folks don’t buy efficient front loaders. More real action… much simply mechanical design and 40% water savings. Sad machine that clickety/clanks forever without really cleaning.🤡
Yes the load sensing their machines do is annoying
Dual-Action agitators would’ve done better at every cycle.