SAS (Side-Angle-Side) Congruence rule (Axiom)

[@shivambajaj6869]

Thank u sir it is so useful 😍😍😍😍👏

[@vanithayoganand3013]

Thank u sir

[@samiammureddyvlogs6903]

It's nice it helps us

[@shainidattsharma6908]

Very nice it helps me

[@armeddiplodocus7076]

amazing video

[@NoorMohammed-jl8mi]

thanq sir its so useful

[@dostotussigreatho]

Hi Noor,
You are very welcome! Glad you liked the video and found it helpful!
Cheers,

[@rahulgurjar5603]

Nice video

[@dostotussigreatho]

Thanks Rahul for sharing your feedback. Glad you liked the video. Cheers,

[@konho7967]

difference between SAS and CPCT rule congruence

[@sreelatharaghu1748]

very good

[@dostotussigreatho]

Hi Sreelatha,
You are very welcome!
Cheers,

[@albertdorador1700]

The right triangle on the right at min 3 is impossible, as side lengths (quite obviously) do not satisfy the Pythagorean Theorem.

[@dostotussigreatho]

Hi Albert,
Thanks for pointing that out. You are right that PR should not be 13. It should have been 12.5. Thats a typing error. Still, it is besides the point. The main idea for that example is to show that in those two triangles ABC and PQR, BC = QR = 10 cm while other corresponding sides AB, PQ and AC, PR are different.
Cheers,

[@AnilSingh-vx4zs]

Superb

[@dostotussigreatho]

Hi Anil, glad you liked the video! Cheers,

[@AnilSingh-vx4zs]

Thankx

[@AnilSingh-vx4zs]

Thanks

[@shivsharma6398]

Yes

[@dostotussigreatho]

Hi, Glad you liked the video.
Cheers,

[@abutalibturabi2560]

shuut r ugy ahh up

[@bindiasoin2066]

We are going to be a long time in Goa so I am not attend my class because I am not done my work

[@sid4727]

Not an axiom but a proved theorem

[@thatonedeepvoid7827]

Bacha this too much

[@jamesdickens1374]

This is not an axiom, it is proved in Euclid's elements.. please take this video down