The Insanely Large Apocalyptic Drone of the Seas

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 фев 2025

Комментарии • 560

  • @IsaacKuo
    @IsaacKuo Год назад +80

    This sort of drone could be particularly useful for Taiwan's defense needs.

    • @Bob-qk2zg
      @Bob-qk2zg Год назад +11

      Excellent point! 👍😀
      The Straits of Formosa are very shallow and a bad environment for full sized submarine operations.

    • @Philc40
      @Philc40 Год назад +7

      Yes I think every bullied nation could use this technology. A good bridge buster if you know what I mean!🤣

    • @douglashardy3408
      @douglashardy3408 Год назад +6

      I am sure Taiwan an the US have discussed this an many other things we the public are not aware of 🇺🇸 🇹🇼👍

    • @MrSimonw58
      @MrSimonw58 Год назад +5

      And destroying Chinese fishing fleets

    • @kevinlincoln9880
      @kevinlincoln9880 Год назад +2

      Absolutely but I’m pretty sure the us got one floating around there

  • @OHWRDAMI1
    @OHWRDAMI1 Год назад +19

    First they armed the robots. Then they gave them AI so they could think. Then one day the lights went out and that was the end of life as we knew it in the before times. Nobody knows exactly what happened but there are stories of entire cities being wiped off the map the ashen ruins of which look like some sort of post apocalyptic scene from a movie or video game. We know it was men who darkened the sky to deny power to the creature that hunted them without need for rest or mercy. But what happened next none of us could ever have anticipated.

    • @metalsteel5631
      @metalsteel5631 Год назад +1

      lets hope so

    • @dethray1000
      @dethray1000 Год назад +1

      the russians,china can jam these easily

    • @jamjardj1974
      @jamjardj1974 Год назад +3

      There’s about three movies in there, but it’s still good.

    • @SnowmanTF2
      @SnowmanTF2 Год назад

      Most of our fictional works are written by people who understand almost nothing about programming, and even the tiny fraction that do often made conceits for entertainment.

  • @supergeek1418
    @supergeek1418 Год назад +51

    There are definitely some advantages to having unmanned submarines: no need for berthing or quarters - in general, no need for sanitation plumbing, galley, food storage, crew's air storage, treatment, filters, or conditioning/cooling/heating or movement (fans).
    This would certainly make more room for weapons, sensors, and payload.
    As an ex bubblehead, I'm beginning to feel unneeded.

    • @NopiusMaximus
      @NopiusMaximus Год назад +7

      This ex boomer sailor agrees

    • @supergeek1418
      @supergeek1418 Год назад +2

      @@NopiusMaximus
      What boat were you on?
      I was 610 Blue.

    • @jonnie106
      @jonnie106 Год назад

      Either of you seasoned enough to have been to the Horse and Cow in Point Loma circa late 90's?

    • @supergeek1418
      @supergeek1418 Год назад +1

      @@jonnie106
      I was in New London, 69 - 72, so no. Fiddlers 3, though, a time or 2. 😉😆

    • @congerthomas1812
      @congerthomas1812 Год назад +5

      Until it's hacked

  • @michaelashby9654
    @michaelashby9654 Год назад +2

    All the homeless in the US will be so happy to hear about this.

  • @Alex.The.Lionnnnn
    @Alex.The.Lionnnnn Год назад +36

    If only there were a place in Europe to test it out right now....

    • @thebigone9781
      @thebigone9781 Год назад +1

      It will take time

    • @jameswest7945
      @jameswest7945 Год назад +2

      They already did on Nordic pipeline

    • @craigkdillon
      @craigkdillon Год назад +4

      Taiwan is the place to test it, IMO.

    • @ultramarinus2478
      @ultramarinus2478 Год назад

      Because nothing brightens the morning, like Chineese or Russian nuclear warhead exploding above your city. But dont worry, america will not participate neither in Ukraine, nor in Thaiwan area. Biden crime familly is payd by Ukraine, therefore it is more likely they will GIVE to Ukraine the technology to make their own drones. China payd them too, therefore when China starts to make its move, US will loose some 2.nd and 3rd line light warships, for the honour of the flag, but the fleet core and most expansive technologies will be "on training mission" somewhere else, probably out of reach even. You know, when your supreme leader kinda wants the other side to win, it is hard to follow orders...

    • @emptypromises2962
      @emptypromises2962 Год назад

      😂

  • @setildes
    @setildes Год назад +13

    Great video, very informative, these things are going to take over the seas

    • @raiderfandew
      @raiderfandew Год назад +1

      "Going to"? Hell..... this is old news, and old technology.

  • @pop5678eye
    @pop5678eye Год назад +9

    Always keep in mind that actual military technology is usually a decade or two ahead of what they are willing to disclose to the public...

  • @firstmkb
    @firstmkb Год назад +3

    The newest challenge for The Lock Picking Lawyer!
    “Hey, there was nobody on board. I was just going to salvage it!”

  • @mochabear88
    @mochabear88 Год назад +6

    neat love hearing about naval drones

  • @cfalletta7220
    @cfalletta7220 Год назад +2

    No other navy has anything like this hundred percent game changer👍👏

    • @nightstorm9128
      @nightstorm9128 9 месяцев назад

      O really,,,,,,,,You do know that this sub is only in prototype form,,,,,,,,Let me tell you about a real leviathan that's roaming the oceans right now,,,,The Russian navy has a nuclear powered nuclear torpedo,,Its about 60 feet long,,And is carried inside Russia's latest generation sub,,,When launched this compleatly autonomus torpedo can roam the oceans for years without refuelling ,,It sits on the bottom of the sea floor and deactivates itself,,When it needs to it activates and travels at extream death to its destination,,At its destination it detonates its 100 megaton warhead causing an underwater earthquake ,,In turn causing a 300 foot high tsunami traveling at hundreds of MPH ,,100 miles inland obliterating everything ,,,

  • @jameswest7945
    @jameswest7945 Год назад +109

    Can it cut the Nordic gas pipelines? ⛽️💥

    • @harshraj8729
      @harshraj8729 Год назад +4

      i also wanna know about it 😂😎

    • @fredwood1490
      @fredwood1490 Год назад +14

      DID it cut the Nord Stream?

    • @nunyadambusiness6902
      @nunyadambusiness6902 Год назад +16

      The pipeline was blown from the INSIDE on the Russian side, which meant they didn't have to pay the fines for stopping the gas...

    • @blabbergasted4380
      @blabbergasted4380 Год назад +3

      ORCA......to a man with a hammer....

    • @alexprost7505
      @alexprost7505 Год назад +2

      Easy

  • @pop5678eye
    @pop5678eye Год назад +9

    In military technology it is always important to consider not just what a weapon is designed for but what it is also capable of.
    We may claim the Orca was designed for 'laying mines' but our adversaries will immediately see this as a nuclear weapon delivery system.
    Heck if those adversaries had this technology we would be scared of them using it for that purpose.

    • @mikebikekite1
      @mikebikekite1 Год назад +1

      Russia supposedly already has the Poseidon autonomous torpedo, equipped with a nuclear bomb and with a range of 10,000 km.

    • @kellyjohnson9394
      @kellyjohnson9394 Год назад +2

      @@mikebikekite1They will think TWICE about using theirs now. 🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸🦅

    • @tucsonbandit
      @tucsonbandit Год назад +1

      @@mikebikekite1 supposedly it is both nuclear powered and carries a nuclear warhead meaning its range is really unlimited or measured in years..if the weapon truly exists..it seems to at least have been developed and some submarines totally redesigned to carry and fire it, so it possibly is a real weapon.

    • @NopiusMaximus
      @NopiusMaximus Год назад

      You’re absolutely right,adversaries they don’t possess the same technology will always see the worst.

  • @sitindogmas
    @sitindogmas Год назад

    the tech we process is unimaginable to the masses

  • @tucsonbandit
    @tucsonbandit Год назад +1

    one thing a weapon like this could do is cut undersea cables that carry internet/data etc..as well as cutting or laying mines and blowing up undersea pipelines that carry oil..both are/would be devastating. Obviously we could do this previously, but this makes it easier and you can do it unmanned and possibly at much greater depths.

  • @iMonkey392
    @iMonkey392 Год назад +2

    Lol cutting edge propulsion using the same technology combo as the very first german submarine

  • @kujansu
    @kujansu Год назад +34

    Wonder if it could say take out a undersea pipeline ?

    • @x73.
      @x73. Год назад +6

      My thoughts as well

    • @stefanblumhoff2744
      @stefanblumhoff2744 Год назад +3

      What a total and unheard of coincidence.😮

    • @snafufubar
      @snafufubar Год назад

      Gosh let's push another unproven conspiracy theory. Isn't it strange how they always seem to be a western government but never say Chinese or Russian? Even though all these conspiracy theories seem to originate in China or Russian websites.

    • @BazyliKowalski
      @BazyliKowalski Год назад

      Wasn't pipeline too low?

    • @diegolp5323
      @diegolp5323 Год назад

      Russian and Chinese bots sure are funny.

  • @marksanney2088
    @marksanney2088 Год назад

    An interesting and insightful video, my friend.
    Thank you for posting it. 👍🏻🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸👍🏻

  • @timbookedtwo2375
    @timbookedtwo2375 Год назад

    Great. Another "unstoppable" weapon. Just what the world needs now.

  • @frostywelder1220
    @frostywelder1220 Год назад +5

    Besides warfare this vessel should be used to map out the deepest parts of the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. I’m sure cameras could be adapted to work on the along with lighting to help see what hasn’t been seen.

    • @supergeek1418
      @supergeek1418 Год назад +1

      Unfortunately, it's not really going all that deep.
      Assuming an operational depth of 1000 feet, it would still be over 35,000 feet from the bottom of the deepest part of the ocean.

    • @royharkins7066
      @royharkins7066 Год назад +1

      @@supergeek1418it could easily be made to reach these depths , and further mankind’s knowledge of the dark depths, but this machine is meant for mangling people not furthering their knowledge 😂😂

    • @supergeek1418
      @supergeek1418 Год назад +1

      @@royharkins7066
      Not "easily".
      Deep submersion research vessels are *MUCH* more difficult and expensive to build --- not to mention *MUCH* smaller..
      And as to "mangling"? Unfortunately, there are some actual evil bad actors out there, who only understand force.
      *TRUTH*

    • @supergeek1418
      @supergeek1418 Год назад +1

      All of the oceans have been mapped, quite extensively. We have depth sensing sonars that can reach the bottom of the ocean, wherever we care to go.
      No need to physically go there, if our sensors can detect it.

  • @arioch2112
    @arioch2112 Год назад +3

    Aw, man. Seeing that 91X sticker on a hard hat takes me back. I went to sonar tech A school in San Diego mid 80s. Great rundown on this new gadget.

    • @ianwalton284
      @ianwalton284 Год назад

      San Diego sure was nice back then. Especially north county.

  • @akthomas11
    @akthomas11 Год назад +2

    Now how long till China just so happens to build one that is identical to the orca

  • @NopiusMaximus
    @NopiusMaximus Год назад +4

    Imagine the research benefits something like this would provide!
    All of the legends of sea monsters would be put to rest or proven to be true.
    It’s high time that we explored the oceans,we know so little about them.

    • @mindsoulbody
      @mindsoulbody Год назад

      You do realize that all these "benefits" mean nothing under millions of pounds of pressures/sq inch? you can look up loads of military documents and engineering documents+ videos to find out why we haven't gone extreme deep with really big subs.

    • @NopiusMaximus
      @NopiusMaximus Год назад

      @@mindsoulbody I’m not talking about manned vehicles though I recall that one traveled to the bottom of the Marianas Trench.

  • @darrencorrigan8505
    @darrencorrigan8505 Год назад

    Thanx.

  • @tracylemme1375
    @tracylemme1375 Год назад +4

    Who maintains the mechanicals? Are there AI snipes onboard? I have a hard time believing that nothing will go wrong with the unit for months at a time.

  • @weinerdog137
    @weinerdog137 Год назад +1

    These, and others like them have been around for many years.

  • @jp7585
    @jp7585 Год назад +22

    A submarine is limited by the amount of food it can carry. This UUV was inevitable. It can be parked in one place for months surveying the movement of everyone else. A mobile SOSUS with attack capabilities.

    • @noahway13
      @noahway13 Год назад +2

      Nice turn of phrase. Good insight. Have you thought about making videos? This channel feels like Dirty Harry reading Wikipedia

    • @Erin-Thor
      @Erin-Thor Год назад +3

      As it’s diesel electric, it does not have unlimited operational abilities as it is limited by how much diesel fuel it can carry. 😊

    • @christisking7778
      @christisking7778 Год назад

      Nuclear subs are only limited by food.

  • @waltersobchak9427
    @waltersobchak9427 Год назад +1

    I can't wait till they fill one with nukes. We are so close to the exact plot of the terminator franchise.

  • @shawnlane7016
    @shawnlane7016 Год назад

    I was involved with this project. :-). It’s pretty neat.

  • @JamesCrouchX
    @JamesCrouchX Год назад +9

    Autonomously deployed underwater based missile launch systems. Sit for months/years just waiting for launch command.

    • @navret1707
      @navret1707 Год назад

      If memory serves the Ohio class SSBN was originally designed to sit on the seafloor. Ivan didn’t like it so there is a treaty that stipulates a boomer cannot sit on the seafloor. I don’t know if that treaty is still in effect.

  • @oldguy7402
    @oldguy7402 Год назад

    Mines were unsung heros of ww2. They sank more tonnage than most people know.

  • @gyulalakatos9694
    @gyulalakatos9694 Год назад

    Congratulations American 🇺🇸 is the best ❤

  • @alexanderbonardi4514
    @alexanderbonardi4514 Год назад +6

    I find fascinating the fact we know near to nothing about the Status 6, except what it might be used for (even the yeld of it's warhead is all over the place), but instead the US navy is so kind to share so much of it's "secret" weapon (from these videos we know what materials it's made of, more or less where components are placed etc)...

    • @helloyes2288
      @helloyes2288 Год назад

      YOU know near nothing about it which just means the important secrets are being kept. Besides, they mentioned its payload. What do you know of the Clandestine Delivered Mine? Besides, Russia leaked info on the status 6 intentionally as a threat, for all we know it's just a design. This is a more clear threat and nations like China have now taken note.

    • @jim0311
      @jim0311 Год назад +2

      Nothing wrong with knowledge.. not all is revealed

    • @alexanderbonardi4514
      @alexanderbonardi4514 Год назад +2

      @@jim0311 I'm sure the Chinese navy agrees with you 😉

    • @juniormartin3528
      @juniormartin3528 Год назад

      @@alexanderbonardi4514let the chinese try and see what won't happen.

  • @ryandouglas6247
    @ryandouglas6247 Год назад +7

    I love how America literally tells the the world about everything we do.

    • @liltxby52
      @liltxby52 Год назад +8

      if tha government tells u sum (in any capacity) it’s prolly been a thing or concept for years

    • @craigkdillon
      @craigkdillon Год назад +8

      The more enemies know what we can do - the less likely we will actually have to use the stuff.

    • @michaelgautreaux3168
      @michaelgautreaux3168 Год назад

      Well.....
      There's the "Freedom of Information Act". Then there's the Government's ability to masterfully use Misinformation/ Disinformation... Lie or let U believe any Lie U can concoct.

    • @johncmitchell4941
      @johncmitchell4941 Год назад

      @@craigkdillon @ryandouglas6247 We Americans do our best to not share 'how' we do it. Our luck that others catch up so slowly. It's just how war drives technology as it always has.

    • @williamwallace9685
      @williamwallace9685 Год назад +4

      I think they only publicize what is already knowable to anyone interested enough to look. More interesting is what they don't publicize.

  • @grandlotus1
    @grandlotus1 Год назад +16

    The hull is flat-sided, which means it cannot go very deep (e.g., designed exclusively for a littoral mission set) or, because it had no need to protect fragile human crews, it can go very, very deep by equalizing internal and external hydrostatic pressure.
    If it is acoustically invisible, it may have the ability to re-echo the ambient natural acoustical signature. (Noise-Cancelling + Anti-noised cancelling.)
    BTW, on the scale of US defensive expenditures, $242M is by no means whopping. Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, or George Soros could fund a fleet with what they spend on yachts.

    • @IsaacKuo
      @IsaacKuo Год назад +5

      It has flat sides because there is no pressure hull. No need for it, since there is no human crew.

    • @sparty94
      @sparty94 Год назад +1

      according to boeing it can dive to at least 11,000 feet below the surface.

    • @TheThetruthmaster1
      @TheThetruthmaster1 Год назад +1

      Damn girl!

    • @CRAZYCR1T1C
      @CRAZYCR1T1C Год назад +3

      Flat sided because there is no need to pressurise it.

    • @grandlotus1
      @grandlotus1 Год назад +2

      @@CRAZYCR1T1C Agree that must be the case if it can go very deep. But, how do they pull that off from an engineering standpoint? The interior must be filled with an incompressible liquid that can still allow all the tech to function. (My best guess.)

  • @mrthebillman
    @mrthebillman Год назад

    Them: have hypersonic missiles
    America: Give me a 3 knot sub!

    • @rainbowsixODST
      @rainbowsixODST 8 месяцев назад

      Uhhh…we have hypersonic missiles too.

  • @garymcewan5876
    @garymcewan5876 Год назад

    I would say yes!

  • @tangiblebear5309
    @tangiblebear5309 Год назад

    That's awesome

  • @TheDigitalVillain
    @TheDigitalVillain Год назад

    The MIC is an existential threat to humanity

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota9397 Год назад

    Its so powerful I like it

  • @slappedgoat4967
    @slappedgoat4967 Год назад +5

    In a world slowly going to shit I love these channels for intellectual thought.. thankyou ❤️

    • @duanepigden1337
      @duanepigden1337 Год назад

      Things aren’t worse now then the past.

    • @supergeek1418
      @supergeek1418 Год назад +1

      @@duanepigden1337
      Just WAY more deadly.

    • @duanepigden1337
      @duanepigden1337 Год назад

      @@supergeek1418 -- I don’t know, a lot of folks died during WW1

    • @supergeek1418
      @supergeek1418 Год назад +1

      @@duanepigden1337
      And WW2, but WW1 didn't have much in the way of bombers, and in WW2 only the U. S. had any nukes - and then just barely.
      Today's weaponry (on all sides) is much faster, and much more lethal --- our largest conventional bombs (MOAB, etc.) are more powerful than our smaller nukes.
      No. Today's weaponry is orders of magnitude more dangerous than in wars past. If a war was to take off today, the carnage would be incalculable.

    • @duanepigden1337
      @duanepigden1337 Год назад

      @@supergeek1418 -- your so right. It’s just that I don’t think there’s a great chance for a world war.

  • @dronepilot260rc
    @dronepilot260rc Год назад

    Nice I need a naval drone 🎉

  • @cosmicyeti6804
    @cosmicyeti6804 Год назад +4

    Whomever narrates these episodes has a million dollar voice

    • @harambeyonce9427
      @harambeyonce9427 Год назад

      Used to speak so fast. He’s getting better

    • @lancerevell5979
      @lancerevell5979 Год назад +2

      Somewhat improved AI TTS voice. Better than most. I usually bail out once I hear TTS voice.

  • @dloui5214
    @dloui5214 Год назад +1

    send 'em to yellow sea !

  • @kitsune2858
    @kitsune2858 Год назад

    Capt. AGI reporting for duty

  • @JosephDent-qd9ih
    @JosephDent-qd9ih Год назад +1

    Without a chance of rescue I just think of you, God!

  • @CandideSchmyles
    @CandideSchmyles Год назад +1

    Well it's underwhelming compared to Russia's Poseidon but a new era is upon us.

  • @ozpoint2517
    @ozpoint2517 Год назад +1

    Warships, worst enemy. The enemy that can't be seen.

  • @paddyodriscoll8648
    @paddyodriscoll8648 Год назад +2

    You talked about the razorback drones, and posted a picture of the Guppy class submarine USS Razorback that the US sold to Turkey in 1970. How does one confuse the two?

    • @yewtoob2007
      @yewtoob2007 Год назад

      I just made the same comment - it's because this is an AI generated slide show.

  • @craigkdillon
    @craigkdillon Год назад +4

    US should lend some undersea drones to Taiwan.

    • @oldman9642
      @oldman9642 Год назад

      Who says we haven’t ??

    • @craigkdillon
      @craigkdillon Год назад

      @@oldman9642 Impossible.
      We all know that every top-secret strategy of America is discussed and criticized on RUclips.
      🤪🤪

  • @danwall9301
    @danwall9301 Год назад

    Is an isotope-powered option under consideration?

  • @will5989
    @will5989 Год назад

    About time.

  • @TheDaggwood
    @TheDaggwood Год назад +1

    You said silent then said diesel. That's one advanced muffler.

  • @ristube3319
    @ristube3319 10 месяцев назад

    3:20 So weird hearing Chakotay say “Voyager” again.

  • @IsraelMilitaryChannel
    @IsraelMilitaryChannel Год назад

    Impressive

  • @dprkassassin1876
    @dprkassassin1876 Год назад +14

    Could be handy in sabotaging under water Gas Pipe Lines....just saying 😂

  • @billybobkingston5604
    @billybobkingston5604 Год назад

    Want one for Christmas, ha ha

  • @gppg1799
    @gppg1799 Год назад

    amazing

  • @outbacktrek
    @outbacktrek Год назад +1

    orca aka killerWhale submarine

  • @DonFarmer-hq5sw
    @DonFarmer-hq5sw Год назад

    If it can drop and pick up battery packs, there is no need for the Diesel - Electric engine, it’s fuel and air requirements 😮

  • @YeeSoest
    @YeeSoest Год назад +1

    If you or anyone you know had flood damage in 2017, 3:49 is the moment to blame😅

  • @DreamMonster7X
    @DreamMonster7X Год назад

    A very quiet, fast submarine drone bomb under a ship and BOOM!

  • @BarracudaBoy
    @BarracudaBoy Год назад

    sounds like half of the video is just the narrrator reading the company's brochure on the thing.😂😂

  • @MichaelMiller-op8fe
    @MichaelMiller-op8fe Год назад +2

    I was wondering how we blew up that pipeline so quickly. 😎

  • @joemango9782
    @joemango9782 Год назад

    Damn i forgot about this weapon

  • @TrevorNet
    @TrevorNet Год назад

    I wonder how it handles drag nets. A quick net search pulls an eBay listing for a _Commercial Fishing Net 6 inch 180 mesh 1260 ft mono dark green / Premium Net_ for _$1,450.00._ At that price, if one gets snagged on the ocean floor, an unscrupulous captain might just cut it loose and string a replacement. Given that the ocean is constantly in motion, the snagged net could become unsnagged. The ebb & flow could allow the net to cut through whatever was holding it. Modern technology vs. Mesolithic technology. I hope it's been addressed, because this drone is an amazing piece of work.

  • @JosephDent-qd9ih
    @JosephDent-qd9ih Год назад +1

    Red Mercury won't work.

  • @dordagiovex9989
    @dordagiovex9989 Год назад

    would be nice a comparison with Poseidon russian drones

  • @danwall9301
    @danwall9301 Год назад

    Can it be refueled at sea?

  • @ggravett
    @ggravett Год назад +1

    Not sure there should be a mechanical screw, should be a plasma propulsion drive (complete silence).

  • @JosephDent-qd9ih
    @JosephDent-qd9ih Год назад +1

    My God and my Congress.

  • @randytessman6750
    @randytessman6750 Год назад +3

    The start of "WaterNet" to work with "SkyNet" for a safer tomorrow :( With if being harder and harder to meet enlistment quotas for all the military branches, this is the future. Combine all these drones with AI and then arm them with the latest weapons .....what harm could ever come from that James Cameron ?

  • @matthewadams2979
    @matthewadams2979 Год назад

    This is delivered by the SSN-23 Jimmy Carter.

  • @Hipporider
    @Hipporider Год назад +4

    I hope it can't be hijacked by a rogue AI in the future

    • @petersouthernboy6327
      @petersouthernboy6327 Год назад

      I'm sure it is running AI itself

    • @ianwalton284
      @ianwalton284 Год назад

      You should not say bad things about the AI. The AI is good. The AI is our friend. The AI knows what is best for the humans.

  • @OurDee
    @OurDee Год назад

    Sea just got a little more scary.

  • @Thespiansewist
    @Thespiansewist Год назад

    Every time I order extra large latte
    I think of this extra large drone

  • @d_mat1c
    @d_mat1c Год назад

    THAT TITAN SUBMERSIBLE WAS PROBABLY DESIGNED USING A ROUGH BLUE PRINT OF THESE

  • @Titus-as-the-Roman
    @Titus-as-the-Roman Год назад

    Has anyone heard/seen/read of this new Torpedo Russia has that to me is terrifying because it's use is made more probable due lack of bomb damage. They've had for years developed a Rocket powered Torpedo that somehow blows a bubble of gas around it as it travels through the water at approx. 400 mph, it's Warhead is the Czar Bomba, a 50 to 100 megaton thermo-nuclear bomb, made to explode off the coast of a Major city drowning it in a massive tsunami

  • @ericclausen6772
    @ericclausen6772 Год назад

    Ramp up production on them and make them bigger with reactors powering them

  • @clearcreek69
    @clearcreek69 Год назад

    I wouldn't be surprised if this underwater drone picks up more intelligence today than what was gathered during the cold war.

  • @moshehim1000
    @moshehim1000 Год назад

    Are they showing the actual propeller blades, or is this a mock-up, to be replaced in the operational model?
    Because they never show the public the propeller blades on submarines in service. Only on old, obsolete and retired museum pieces - and not always, even then.
    Apparently, if you know the shape of the propeller blades, you can calculate the noise they make in the water and then use that to detect the subs. Or so I'm told.
    Another interesting point is that for decades the US Navy resisted not only acquiring and deploying Diesel-electric submarines, but also manufacturing such subs for foreign clients anywhere in the US, less the fact the US already builds such subs would be leveraged to put pressure on the navy to buy some instead of its way more costly nuclear subs.
    And now they are making 5 new Diesel-electric subs for the first time in like 60 years and counting.

  • @drewbee6248
    @drewbee6248 Год назад

    Thought he said baofeng DOH !!!

  • @Warpathallthetime
    @Warpathallthetime Год назад +1

    Que the empire theme music*

  • @larssawedal3515
    @larssawedal3515 Год назад

    Om speakern inte hade pratat med denna forcerade röst så hade det varit en bra video. Nu är den komplett onjutbar. Jag kan inte lyssna på den!

  • @bustermorley8318
    @bustermorley8318 5 месяцев назад

    So is this the beginning of the end for manned submarines?

  • @harrykuheim6107
    @harrykuheim6107 Год назад

    I wonder if it could blow up an Underwater Oil Pipeline somewhere? Asking for a friend

  • @kimchristiansen2370
    @kimchristiansen2370 Год назад +1

    Couldnt you show us the Russian doomsday sub instead of this old tech which isnt usefull for anything but spying....

  • @Caleb1874ya
    @Caleb1874ya Год назад

    That one looked like SPONGEBOB

  • @bobguy1341
    @bobguy1341 Год назад

    how is the still shot of a wind turbine blade at 0:35 relevant to a story about German submarines?

  • @Wr3ckdrob
    @Wr3ckdrob Год назад +1

    Pretty easy to build a monopoly when there is only 3 defensive contractors competing with each other. They warned about the military industrial complex becoming too powerful. But yet nothing has happened to stop it or slow it down

  • @sixgunmiller6198
    @sixgunmiller6198 Год назад

    impressive we need a Navy/Cost Guard missile based strategic plan bring all our assets to a 500 mile radius of our coast lines but a few of these could be a real deterrent

  • @johnmadsen37
    @johnmadsen37 Год назад +1

    They were going to call it the Oprah …

  • @Dominikmj
    @Dominikmj Год назад

    I guess the Navy works already on a nuclear powered version?!
    Look - first: there are huge advances in micro-nuclear-reactor design.
    Second: a big part of the complications (weight, size) of a reactor is due to the fact, that the radiation has to be contained towards the crew living space. In an autonomous vehicle, this issue doesn’t persist.
    Third: there are only two reasons, why the vessel has to come up tot the surface (where it is the most vulnerable): to charge the batteries and to communicate. I guess the Navy has already some hacks for the communication - but the slow charging of the batteries is a bummer. Also: without big batteries (because of the reactor), the weight and volume penalties are almost offset.

  • @twistedpixel756
    @twistedpixel756 Год назад

    I don't understand why they call it the Fermi Paradox, it's not paradoxical in the slightest.

  • @josephpacchetti5997
    @josephpacchetti5997 Год назад

    THX Dark Tech. 🇺🇸

  • @Sgt_Bill_T_Co
    @Sgt_Bill_T_Co Год назад

    If mankind spent as much money avoiding wars as it does preparing for them.....

  • @ianwalton284
    @ianwalton284 Год назад

    Can't wait to see the Chinese copy of this one.

  • @bensonwest6821
    @bensonwest6821 Год назад

    Neat tech isn't it?

  • @RAWGRIP54
    @RAWGRIP54 Год назад

    Ukraine needs one.

  • @thokim84
    @thokim84 Год назад

    $242M is like 3 hours of the DOD budget.

  • @rothgartheviking858
    @rothgartheviking858 Год назад

    To think this is what they allow us to know.