I have the gen 5 and it is just really good ! You may look at a carpet and think its clean, but running the dyson over it and you can see the amount of dust and hair it collects in its see through bin. Also, the sideway laser light on the dyson shows dirt so much better than just a white LED headlight which other vacuums seem to have. I was so impressed with my gen 5 that I have become a dyson fanboy. Bought their hairstyler airwrap for my wife and she loves it. Bought the airfilter hot cool link and I love that. Get dyson for the technology and real cleaning, get the Miele if you generally have a clean house but want to flex your wealth to people. It's a brand name, that's all, nothing special with the Miele.
I have hx1 for almost three years, it has been used regularly on max power, 20 minutes it last and it is more than enough for my usage. I have Miele c3 for proper full use weekly, but hx1 for quick use on stairs, car cleaning and in tight spaces. To be honest it is good enough for small apartment usage, filtration system on all stick vacuum are not the best. I have been using Miele vacuum for 20 plus years now had the old canister without the power brush which I upgraded to c3 due to lot of think carpet in new home, I have not noticed much dust coming out of hx1 model so far almost three years of usage. We have cat in house so hx1 is used quite a bit during week. Miele vacuum last very long time at same performance level. I can’t say that for any Dyson vaccum.
I have both. Single cyclonic designs require much more frequent filter cleaning. After every use, practically. Although I’m not a fan of how flimsy the Dyson feels, I am impressed with how clean the exhaust filter stays. I’m also impressed with how well it cleans the carpet; for a stick that is.
First I wanted a Dyson, then decided on the Miele, now watching this I'm switched back on the Dyson. I know I'm not loyal but I'm so confused, until you came along and showed me the light.
I like the Dyson but I hate it’s high pitch sound also that the “turbine” design Wich is gold or purple or differs on every model it’s just decorative if you pull it apart it’s nothing it’s just a design selling trick,so I don’ like been fulled (not to that extent at least )and at that price point ,I ve noticed that the spinning brush throws around small pieces.so all those are negatives Dyson but the Miele it has the can at a spot that makes cleaning under furniture difficult if not impossible. PS your video was spot on thanks
@@MusicClements78 good vacuums use cyclones to capture the majority of dust before it reaches the filter. That keeps it running well longer. The Miele has no separation system so the filter clogs too easily
Fine dust particles are not supposed to reach your filter. The filter is supposed to be the last line of defence. If you have too much dust on your filter, it means the cyclones and the meshed shrouds in the bin aren't working as they are supposed to. A choked up filter will significantly reduce suction and airflow.
Maybe i'm mistaken but it seems you are using the carpet care tool of the miele to clean a hard floor. If i'm not mistaken, you need to change to a soft roller for a hard floor. Also, you didn't mentioned, miele has a different head for animal hairs. BTW, maybe you did that but again you didn't mention you need to twist the filter top cap (miele recommend 10 times) to clean it up.
If I remember right, there should be a secondary lifetime filter in the Miele, but it's quite bad how you can't really remove it. I desperately wanna like the Miele, but despite it being german made and stuff, I can't imagine it having a longer lifespan than a Dyson, maybe even worse because of the despicable filter design.
To me, They have a very similar design to a shop vac. I would pay maybe $100 for one. But they are $400+ in the US. If someone could prove to me they are better than a $80 craftsman or ridgid, then I may be interested. But for now I would never buy one.
@@VacMaster1991 they’re very different to shop vacs (far smaller, better filtration, different tools, surprisingly great quality), but I can get why you wouldn’t want to blow so much on one!
@@VacMaster1991kenmore, vacmaster and power flite make a Henry knock cost between 80-160 bucks. I have the vacmaster one the only complaint I have is the hose.
The Miele is terrible, especially in relation the the price. It is heavy, has problems as soon as its not just some easy dust and worst of all it scratches wooden floors if there is the tiniest bits of gravel. We returned ours within two weeks, after a few aweful scratches. Do. Not. Buy. I was expecting it to live up to the Miele name and standard. It didnt.
performance reviews is so disingenuous he lies to people alm ost daily and they call him out on it in his comment section. i blocked him on reddit , hes so insufferable
Yep. He's probably the worst vacuum reviewer out there. I don't understand why people watch him considering Vacuum Wars, Ibaisaic, Parwaz, and of course, me! I haven't seen a video from him that doesn't have some type of bs in it.
@@VacMaster1991 agreed, you always seem fair and dont automatically trash a vacuum just for being cordless. on his channel god forbid he reviews a dyson, where he has a meltdown practically and doesnt even try to hide his bias.
Thank you for making this video! I've seen stuff going around online with nonsensors trying to say that the Miele is better than Dyson. Um, no. LOL. The Miele probably would have been good 20 years ago. You really can't beat a Dyson. Even if something is equivalent or better than Dyson in one area the Dyson will always beat it out in multiple other areas.
@@Tar0245 the nonsenseors are probably sponsored by Miele. I paid for both of these. And have no affiliation with either brand. A Bissell is better than this miele. The Triflex is one of the most disappointing vacuums I have reviewed. It needs a full redesign to be competitive.
@@VacMaster1991I mean Sebo would be better than Miele because their vacuums seem to have better filtration and carpet performance. But Miele is absolutely a joke.
The reviews on the Miele are dismal. They’ve replaced it already with a Chinese made model. No im not joking. Dyson are at least designed and developed in the UK, made in Malaysia at their own facilities. Miele get theirs made by a 3rd party in China.
I have the gen 5 and it is just really good ! You may look at a carpet and think its clean, but running the dyson over it and you can see the amount of dust and hair it collects in its see through bin. Also, the sideway laser light on the dyson shows dirt so much better than just a white LED headlight which other vacuums seem to have. I was so impressed with my gen 5 that I have become a dyson fanboy. Bought their hairstyler airwrap for my wife and she loves it. Bought the airfilter hot cool link and I love that.
Get dyson for the technology and real cleaning, get the Miele if you generally have a clean house but want to flex your wealth to people. It's a brand name, that's all, nothing special with the Miele.
Definitely. Plus the Gen5 is more expensive so you can flex even more😅
Miele is now 520€ and Dyson Gen5 for 750€; love the flexing I will be doing to people
It's still $929 in the US for this model.
I have hx1 for almost three years, it has been used regularly on max power, 20 minutes it last and it is more than enough for my usage. I have Miele c3 for proper full use weekly, but hx1 for quick use on stairs, car cleaning and in tight spaces. To be honest it is good enough for small apartment usage, filtration system on all stick vacuum are not the best. I have been using Miele vacuum for 20 plus years now had the old canister without the power brush which I upgraded to c3 due to lot of think carpet in new home,
I have not noticed much dust coming out of hx1 model so far almost three years of usage. We have cat in house so hx1 is used quite a bit during week.
Miele vacuum last very long time at same performance level. I can’t say that for any Dyson vaccum.
Dysons last just fine if you take care of them. Most of mine are between 3 and 12 years old.
I have both. Single cyclonic designs require much more frequent filter cleaning. After every use, practically. Although I’m not a fan of how flimsy the Dyson feels, I am impressed with how clean the exhaust filter stays. I’m also impressed with how well it cleans the carpet; for a stick that is.
@@Cleaning_Hero the dyson is pretty well built. Mine has suffered some falls and heavy use and is still working great
First I wanted a Dyson, then decided on the Miele, now watching this I'm switched back on the Dyson. I know I'm not loyal but I'm so confused, until you came along and showed me the light.
@@ryr635 the Miele has a cool design. But the machine needs a lot more suction and a much better filter design
Being loyal to a corporation sounds like a great way to have a very bad time.
Depends
I like the Dyson but I hate it’s high pitch sound also that the “turbine” design Wich is gold or purple or differs on every model it’s just decorative if you pull it apart it’s nothing it’s just a design selling trick,so I don’ like been fulled (not to that extent at least )and at that price point ,I ve noticed that the spinning brush throws around small pieces.so all those are negatives Dyson but the Miele it has the can at a spot that makes cleaning under furniture difficult if not impossible.
PS your video was spot on thanks
If you didn’t know, but Miele’s container can be installed both at the bottom and at the top
Not sure what you mean
@@VacMaster1991 Sorry, the answer was not for you) .
@@ДокторЛивси-г9иif that’s the case ..Miele for me is better..thanx for the info
I need one for hotel cleaning and working every day for 2 hours. Which would last more?
The dyson, due to its substantially better cyclone system. But for a business, get a commercial vacuum.
To me it is supposed to find large amount of dust and debrees on filtering systems, otherwise it means it did not work properly
@@MusicClements78 good vacuums use cyclones to capture the majority of dust before it reaches the filter. That keeps it running well longer. The Miele has no separation system so the filter clogs too easily
Fine dust particles are not supposed to reach your filter. The filter is supposed to be the last line of defence. If you have too much dust on your filter, it means the cyclones and the meshed shrouds in the bin aren't working as they are supposed to. A choked up filter will significantly reduce suction and airflow.
Correct.
Your the best vacuum reviewer out there!
Thanks. No sponsors here!
Thank you. Great video as always. Miele corded vacuums are phenomenal. The Triflex HX2 cordless model needs to be updated.
There canister machines are pretty good. This one. Not so much
Nice comparison. What do you think about shark cordless pet stratos ?
@@andyding9079 it's ok. But the automatic floor adjustment slows the brush down too much and makes it stall.
This was really useful. Thank you
Thanks
Love these comparisons!
Great
Awesome comparison
Thanks so much
Maybe i'm mistaken but it seems you are using the carpet care tool of the miele to clean a hard floor. If i'm not mistaken, you need to change to a soft roller for a hard floor. Also, you didn't mentioned, miele has a different head for animal hairs.
BTW, maybe you did that but again you didn't mention you need to twist the filter top cap (miele recommend 10 times) to clean it up.
The Miele didn't come with a soft roller
Is it heavy ? Thinking of buying v12 or gen 5
The gen5 is pretty heavy. The v15 is a good in-between for weight and power
I like the Miele setup compared to Dyson. It is more comfortable to use.
@@jbt8922 it is comfortable. But the performance issues make it hard to recommend
Then use a smaller Dyson that's not as heavy.
@@Tar0245 like the v12 or v10. They are pretty lightweight.
If I remember right, there should be a secondary lifetime filter in the Miele, but it's quite bad how you can't really remove it. I desperately wanna like the Miele, but despite it being german made and stuff, I can't imagine it having a longer lifespan than a Dyson, maybe even worse because of the despicable filter design.
I wanted to like it too. But the filters and brush roll make it hard to recommend.
The hair part is a deal breaker for me. I have long hair and I have two cats.
@@greenblack6552 i have three cats and a mum with long hair. The Miele struggles with hair a lot. I definitely recommend the Dyson
Can you do a comparison on this Miele vs the Dyson v15 does this this Miele have more suction than the v15
I don't have the Miele anymore
You seriously need to get a Henry 😁
They are basically glorified shop vacs. Plus they are very expensive in the US.
@@VacMaster1991
I wouldn’t say they’re glorified shop vacs. I’d say they’re much better than Shop Vacs
To me, They have a very similar design to a shop vac. I would pay maybe $100 for one. But they are $400+ in the US. If someone could prove to me they are better than a $80 craftsman or ridgid, then I may be interested. But for now I would never buy one.
@@VacMaster1991 they’re very different to shop vacs (far smaller, better filtration, different tools, surprisingly great quality), but I can get why you wouldn’t want to blow so much on one!
@@VacMaster1991kenmore, vacmaster and power flite make a Henry knock cost between 80-160 bucks. I have the vacmaster one the only complaint I have is the hose.
Dude, don’t let your canister get past the fill line on the Dyson. It would have performed even better if you hadn’t had it so full
@benscott3603 yes it would
The Miele is terrible, especially in relation the the price. It is heavy, has problems as soon as its not just some easy dust and worst of all it scratches wooden floors if there is the tiniest bits of gravel. We returned ours within two weeks, after a few aweful scratches. Do. Not. Buy.
I was expecting it to live up to the Miele name and standard. It didnt.
Sadly your absolutely right
Loll. Completely disproves people like performance reviews and similar ones. Miele is good but not better than Dyson. This cordless is pathetic.
I was really shocked it didn't perform better. Especially for $930.
performance reviews is so disingenuous he lies to people alm ost daily and they call him out on it in his comment section. i blocked him on reddit , hes so insufferable
Yep. He's probably the worst vacuum reviewer out there. I don't understand why people watch him considering Vacuum Wars, Ibaisaic, Parwaz, and of course, me! I haven't seen a video from him that doesn't have some type of bs in it.
@@VacMaster1991 agreed, you always seem fair and dont automatically trash a vacuum just for being cordless. on his channel god forbid he reviews a dyson, where he has a meltdown practically and doesnt even try to hide his bias.
I know, right? It's so obvious he lies it now even funny. We'll maybe😁
Thank you for making this video! I've seen stuff going around online with nonsensors trying to say that the Miele is better than Dyson. Um, no. LOL. The Miele probably would have been good 20 years ago. You really can't beat a Dyson. Even if something is equivalent or better than Dyson in one area the Dyson will always beat it out in multiple other areas.
@@Tar0245 the nonsenseors are probably sponsored by Miele. I paid for both of these. And have no affiliation with either brand. A Bissell is better than this miele. The Triflex is one of the most disappointing vacuums I have reviewed. It needs a full redesign to be competitive.
@@VacMaster1991I mean Sebo would be better than Miele because their vacuums seem to have better filtration and carpet performance. But Miele is absolutely a joke.
The reviews on the Miele are dismal. They’ve replaced it already with a Chinese made model. No im not joking. Dyson are at least designed and developed in the UK, made in Malaysia at their own facilities. Miele get theirs made by a 3rd party in China.
@@Olliebobalong that's actually pretty shocking. The 2 and 3 star reviews day a lot