“Silicone Valley People Will Lose Their Jobs!” - Reaction To OpenAI Being A $29 Billion Company
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 янв 2023
- FaceTime or Ask Patrick any questions on minnect.com/.
Want to get clear on your next 5 business moves? valuetainment.com/academy/
In this short clip, Patrick Bet-David, Neil Tyson and Adam Sosnick talk about the consequences of open AI.
Watch the PBD Podcast Ep.223 here: • Neil deGrasse Tyson | ...
To reach the Valuetainment team you can email: booking@valuetainment.com
#valuetainment
Neil is the type of guy to wake you up to tell you he’s about to take a nap
😂
And he'sooooo sure of it.
😂 that’s a good one
@@inzo313 And its posted in every comment section of any video with NDT
His message about his nap was given to him by the religion of science. Spread this message for us. 'Nap time.'
'School system values grades more than students value learning.' So true
I would expand this citation to society!!! Society values grades more than people value knowledge!!! In Mexico, ppl pay to others for doing their postgraduate degrees, I know it because I once was paid, then realized this was so fu&$%# up si I send that ppl to hell... And don't get me wrong, education and science is fundamental to human progress, its formalization is part of the sistematization of the process of teach and learn, and in my opinion that's necesary to improve methods and methodologies...
@@XJRULO
Only true if the stuff “in the box” is sufficient for you. If nothing outside the box every crosses your mind it probably is sufficient for you.
We need AI, look, Shakespeare would write:
'Tis a lamentable fact, dear friends, that the system doth deceive,
With passing grades its sole intent, and not true learning to achieve.
Short-term memory is all they seek, and knowledge fleeting as the breeze.
The students of today, alas, prioritize good marks with ease.
This problem, I do assure, doth outweigh any AI,
For 'tis the future of our land that's at stake, and not a trifle, say I.
A certain former president would write:
Folks, let me tell you something, the system is rigged. It's all about numbers, passing students, ranking, evaluations. But what about what these students are really learning? It's all just temporary, you ask them a couple of weeks later, they won't remember a thing. And these students today, they don't even know the meaning of being a student, all they care about is getting good grades without putting in any real effort. Believe me, this problem is bad, really bad, it's a disaster for the education system and for the future of our country.
Depends on the student. If you aren't dumb you can learn plenty in school, stop making excuses.
Can ai tell us why the U.S news media promotes xenophobia?🤔📰
You work for 40yrs to have $1m in your retirement, Meanwhile, some people are putting just $5k or $10k in a meme coin for just a few months and now they are multimillionaires. I wish anyone who reads, to be a person in success in life.....??
How long does it take to learn and make money after you get going? I might like to try it out in the future. Maybe I still kinda hesitate about it because I don't know all the ends and outs, pros and cons.
Most people think, investing in crypto is all about buying coins and leaving them to rise, common it takes much analysis to be a successful crypto tràder
@@Richards631 That's true trading with an expert is the best strategy for newbies and busy investors who have little or no time to monitor the trade. I will advise you not to start tràding on your own it's very risky, seek the advice of a professional trader.
How does one know a genuine and reliable account manager these days?
Having monitored my portfolio performance which has made a jaw-dropping $200k from just the past two quarters alone. I have learned why experienced traders make more success in the market from Stacy Garric
Neil is extremely out of the loop here. Everything he claims AI doesn't do, it's already doing. Spectacularly.
he's speaking about people like you and the fun part is, you have no clue.
Bro ai is so politically correct
Nah, it writes shitty, derivative lyrics. And on and on…
Nobody loves having a conversation with Neil more than Neil.
Neil is an astrophysicist. Not a computer/software expert.
A phenomenal car mechanic cannot fix a jet engine.
@@miamitten1123 superiority complex... he uses his deemed authority to say facts, while also discrediting a lot of known facts, so it's as if regardless of your proof his trumps it....
get some new material, you cliche./
@@miamitten1123 they can actually do pretty well on jet engines. sorry.
@@miamitten1123 he’s a scientists an astrophysicist at the top university in the world for it surrounded by leading experts in science and engineering. Physics actually has a lot of overlapping topics with Computer Science and most physicists have to do a lot of software engineering and data science. So yes Neil can speak about these topics because he knows more than 99% of the population about them.
Pat, thank you for your patience with Neil.
What changed with him? He’s become so rude & obnoxious in recent years. He always seemed like the interesting scientist passionate about teaching others. He just gives off an air of superiority over everyone now, even when he’s a guest on their podcast.
There were moments in this podcast where I imagined myself being there calling noel.a fucnung idiot.
Conservative tears in the comments lol
@simonjones4941 Seems he may be under establishment control these days. I used to love him, but now he shills a lot for the establishment Left.
@@morriswatkins5667 How do you know that the people in the comment section are conservative?
Neil made a GREAT point with that Cheating example. The bigger issue isnt kids potentially cheating, its the system in place that focuses more on GRADES and not actual LEARNING
He missed the point entirely in my eyes. He's right that if you use it to cheat you're subverting the entire point of learning, but he's missing how useful it is for genuine learning. It's a far better teacher than he or any of us could hope to be. I'd be MILES ahead of where I am today if I'd had access to chatGPT as a curious kid. I've learned more about coding in a week on chatGPT than in years and years on the internet.
"teach me pythagoras' theorem in a way i can understand".... immediate tailored answer.
"I don't understand the last bit, why does that value become so high"... immediate expansion on whatever you want.
It's a 24/7, almost flawless, personal teacher.
only that chatgpt still cant do basic arithmetic at times@@glenben92
But you not only ask it to write you an essay, you ask it to explain it to you in detail, and you can ask it to explain it differently each time until you can understand it. This makes learning so amazing
“Why would you cheat at all?”
Politicians using insider trading but making $200,000,000: “cheating is profitable”
Nancy Pelosi and her husband lol
sheep;DO THE RIGHT THING!
says the people
Me; TELL YOUR POLITICIANS TO DO THE RIGHT THING!
we gotta follow the rules but they making profits on top of profits
Yeah, when it comes to social and family matters, maybe not cheat. But when it comes to what we call society and it’s constructs, “the establishment,” it’s a game and it’s rigged, it’s already cheating you and your chances to be sovereign. Cheating in this instance is merely playing the game, the only advice I’d give is to cheat well and also be informed, use the cheating to push the limits of what you already know, and you’ll be flawless.
And Pelosi got away with it without even a scolding or finger wag from Poke a Hontus or Berney the $350,000 buyout guy.
🤦🏿♂️🤦🏿♂️ if they weren't cheaters our government would probably much better. We would actually have smarter politicians that made educated decisions
When Niel said that when students cheat, its because they are worried about the grade and not learning. That is really deep and made me really think. I have been in classes that made me want to go to sleep do to the fact the teacher was boring. I took a medieval history class in college taught by a wonderful professor, and I wanted to learn. He made it engaging and fun. I got an A in the class and loved learning about the subject. I never once thought about cheating because I wanted to understand and know the subject. I was not thinking about my grade because the class and professor was amazing. When you cheat and get away with it, you get a temporary high that you beat the system. That "high" feeling is temporary, but truly understanding the subject changes you and are better for it. You feel better and become better as a human, when you truly understand and know the subject/material.
Your teacher and the grade school teacher to your children will one day replace humans, roll right into the classroom and say "Good morning children, please take out your notebooks and pens and begin to write or who was the first president of the United States..." This thing is not the Godsend all of you are ascribing it to be because it WILL begin to replace jobs. Why would businesses and even state and federal government not want to change over to full AI and mechanical bots with all the strain there is right now on spending? Salaries? GONE. A thing of the past, put in bots. "But who'll fix the bots?!" We will create bots to fix the bots. They're more efficient and cost effective.
Was it really that deep? Seemed like stating the obvious to me
Well yeah, our entire school system is more about grades than learning. In fact, many of the practices used in schools(Like forced homework), is actually known through research to have negative value, and negatively impact learning and retention. It's just a test to see how well you can comply and obey and get "good grades" like they want you to. And also a way for them to keep getting paid.
...I gather YOU didn't do well in school, huh?
most student cheat because they know something wrong with the history, and plus you must use your hand to build anything, but today you really don't because of the robots, but nothing wrong with openai, The library need to get bigger. and the people that are discluded, from the knowledge of learning now gets to learn faster.
"Stay flexible enough to shift your career ambitions in the event you can be replaced" is actually a great line. In the "48 Laws of Power" book a similar thing is talked about. Also, the term "Renassiance man" is a thing for a reason. During that time period, being able to do multiple things, having multiple varied skills, etc, was highly valued. Because people who are flexible can be useful across a wider range of fields. For example, people like Galileo weren't just ONE thing, Galileo was an: Astronomer, Physicist, Engineer, and known as a Polymath. He did many things, all of which can be useful to someone and used as a career. If suddenly no one had any need for Astronomy anymore, he could still work as a Physicist, or Engineer, etc.. He had options, he was flexible, and most prominent historical figures were exactly the same way. Never put all of your eggs into one basket, unless you have a way to guarantee that basket never gets dropped or stolen.
Yep, sounds like the average person. This should go very smoothly. hahaha
A.I will replace anything you learn quicker than what it takes to even decide what to learn
yeah, but that's in large part because sciences weren't advanced as they were now - so it took less time to master them, per the time's standards of a mastery
It takes around 5-10 yeaes to get decend at some Job it takes ai a few seconds to processs Data ...
Not everybody are success in the way switching the career
The power of chatGPT is that it's able to explain the concepts and why "it chose" to do it the way it did. It dramatically increases the learning rate if you know how to phrase the questions and/or follow up on them
Thank you, it is a tool.
exactly bro
The key point you make is if you know how to phrase the questions. Asking the right question is everything.
I dont think it increases learning rate. What is the process of learning something? Because someone giving you the right answer and even why they got it, does not allow you to learn anything.
It's engineered by the same control freaks that hate freedom of thought. Ironically, freedom of thought is what got us this far. Tell the AI to figure that one out... oh that's right, it's engineered by the same control freaks... you get the point.
Thank you for coming to Neil's show, Pat. Neil enjoyed having you come by.
Absolutely, it was nauseating to watch a grown-arse man passively accept being gaslit *on his own show* 🙈
"Most people die at 25...we just don't bury them until their 75" - Benjamin Franklin
Can you cite your source?
Thanks ♥
That's probably the most depressing thing I've ever heard :(
@@ellenino “fish and company often stink after 3 days”
-Benny Franklin
That's definitely not Ben Franklin.... That sentiment is a 20th century construction. Plus very few if any men lived to 75 in 1770
Stupid. "Most people" was not s phrase ever uttered in the 18th century, much less the expectation of living to 75....., dork.
Neil never disappoints when it comes to disappointing
Maybe you are just dumb and calling people who are intellectually superior to you disappointing is what makes you feel good and that's fine.
He's a dud😂
“I don’t really lose sleep over this”
Said the already very well established boomer who obviously doesn’t need to worry about breaking through and being successful in a society that’s seeing jobs threatened by Ai.
I have multiple friends who absolutely destroyed themselves for 4-5 years getting CS degrees, and are now facing the reality that a ton of jr dev jobs may very well be in jeopardy in the near future.
You are misrepresenting his position. He said he doesn't worry when it comes to AI gaining consciousness and destroying civilization.
@@SkinnyGreekGod it doesnt have to gain consciousness...it just has to replace a lot of jobs to totally destroy the economy
Neil is like the teacher that claimed you'll never have a computer in your pocket everywhere you go. No joke, a teacher actually said that to us before the iphone came out LOL
Yup I remember
@@TheAnswer2023what?
More likely he´s the one who said you WILL have one, he´s made plenty of technological predictions
Neil is like the teacher who called himself 'science' and failed anyone who questioned him.
What did he say that made you think he would ever make such a claim? On the contrary, he specifically said humans are incredibly bad at forecasting - including himself. To illustrate this fact, he made an example of himself by attempting to forecast in his own book. So again, what specifically made you think he would make a claim similar to, "you'll never have a computer in your pocket."
Great video! A lot of folks have been going on about a December rally and said stocks that would be experiencing significant growth these festive season, any idea which stocks this may be? I just sold my home in the Boca Grande area and I’m looking to remunerate a lump sum into the stock market before stocks rebound, is this a good time to buy or no?
@Craig Daniels Such market uncertainties are the reason I don’t base my market judgements and decisions on rumours and here-says, got the best of me 2020 and had me holding worthless position in the market, I had to revamp my entire portfolio through the aid of an advisor, before I started seeing any significant results happens in my portfolio, been using the same advisor and I’ve scaled up 750k within 2 years, whether a bullish or down market, both makes for good profit, it all depends on where you’re looking.
@@tatianastarcic True, we’re only just an information away from amassing wealth, I know a lot of folks that made fortunes from the Dotcom crash as well as the 08’ crash and I’ve been looking into similar opportunities in this present market, could this coach that guides yo help?
@@maiadazz Found her, I wrote her an email and scheduled a call, hopefully she responds, I plan to start 2023 on a woodnote financially.
@@tatianastarcic Melissa Scott Glazner is a fraud and a thief. Do not do business with this person. I've also heard she's not to be trusted around your pets. Very strange fetishes.
Electric battery minerals (lithium nickel and cobalt mining companies), and anything related to AI, or electric vehicle manufacturers. You'll be good.
Thank Neil. We should never underestimate the ability of real humans by AI and I take to heart the good advice to be flexible in making a living we never knew what could be good earning opportunities in the future or if we can lose what we currently have. Good insights on the content creators as a sample.
your wrong.. chatgpt is better than the world's 1000 smartest ppl together
Interesting point about the pets.
I have thought a more cynical version of that thought before - thinking about the fear of advanced AI or alien civilizations being thrust into everyday human life.
I think the fear stems from an inkling that whatever replaces us at the top of the food chain will leverage that power to exploit and dominate to it's own will (how we have seemingly treated that position)
It's entirely possible this replacement could be soley aimed at benevolence, but the uneasy feeling of having loss of control to an intelligence outside your full understanding (including it's motives/aims/manipulation capabilities) makes it nearly impossible to not have the urge to project our own propensity to prop yourselves up at any cost by operating in the dark or grey areas onto the new entity at the top. As a species, more power has not always resulted in good outside the species or the community with the most power.
Damn respect to this guy for keeping the conversation civil with the immense amount of passive aggressiveness coming of of niel.
well we dont have the context of what was going on before this clip. unless i see the whole context i reserve judgment.
@@uria2001 The exchange got testier in another clip. (not sure of the sequence). NDT was frustrated by Pat's "arguments" about vaccines.
Agreed. And I’m assuming you’re referring to PBD and not his guest. Tyson was arrogant as heck.
@@Dixiecast yeah, I'm surprised Joe Rogan ever had him back on again after how pushy he was a couple of times ago. I had to switch that one off because it was so irritating.
@@citizenghosttown i would still say the samething. i would need to see the whole video. clips are great but dont show full context. in the end maybe NDT is being passive aggressive. my point is clips, tweets, short form of conversations, ect, dont give enough context
The other problem is that change is happening way faster than people can keep up.
This. The adoption rate is way faster than policy implementation rate and awareness of best practices. They basically just released it to the public to show the investors "there's your money's worth" and get a higher valuation on their product.
The stage has been set with the influencer > follower scheme. Easy to adopt anything mindlessly now. It's ironic how the supposedly "science lovers" are completely ignoring social sciences and the recent developments in those areas.
The apathetic lot who think they're so flexible don't acknowledge the fact that they might not come up on top. Actually, they probably won't with this sheepy attitude.
because humans are dummies and should be assisted with AI, politicians should be replaced with AI, it's the greatest tool since the discovery of fire
Please understand Van Gough did not just make art that "looked nice" he made art that reflected his emotional state. We relate to PEOPLES emotional states, because we ourselves are emotional creatures. This has to be real and coming from another person for it to be real, for it to FEEL real. If you know it came from an AI then you will know that the art wasnt coming from a genuine place. Sure you might be able to relate to it in your own way, but it will always be a little more shallow knowing that it came from an AI an not from a real person. Because its that persons story behind the camera, behind the painting that we relate to. Its not just the painting itself.
And thats why AI can never replace us in writing, art or anything creative for that matter.
IF this makes sense this please copy / pasta to other people there seems to be a big misconception around this. We are emotional beings not logical beings! AI is fundamentally logical not emotional! Thats the difference. And there is no need to worry if society starts to value and appreciate this in a bigger way, this should be common knowledge, otherwise yes people will freak out for no reason like usual.
@@justaguyinasuitxx yes
@@justaguyinasuitxx people always forget this
Are you eager to learn more about finance? Maybe you are thinking about a career in the finance and investment industry. The key is not spending time, but investing it. Investing in yourself is the best thing you can do. If you’ve got talents, no one can take that from you......
@valda Maidel That very correct!! And that is why most of them end up losing their money to scammers
knowledge is the greatest and quickest path to financial freedom, the rich stay rich by spending like the poor yet investing... While the poor stays poor my pending like the rich yet not Investing
@@kirstenraedmund7346 investing is very good and necessary but before you invest with any broker make sure that it will be a person that two or more people have talked about
Don't just rush in to investing with any broker because you have the money and you want to invest. Look for real br0ker
Who is this professional trader that everyone keeps talking about, I always see good recommendations about her? How can I get across to her for a start up?
Tried it for some game programming. It's fairly limited in that regard. You pretty much have to be a programmer or have very specific ideas to tell it what to do correctly. If you give it basic instructions, it will give you basic code. It's not capable of the nuance that a game designer would want out of a good game. It's good at overly technical stuff that is hard to wrap your head around though, and great for learning.
Langchain showed that it can solve this issue.
Besides that, you can fine-tune your own application to be good at code, then you get something like GitHub Copilot and by further fine-tuning you get " give me a cool new action game like Modern Warfare " an hour later you got a fully fledged game
@Flonity It will be true of pretty much any model that functions in the same way as chat GPT. For example you can't ask it to "program a sword swing", because at most it will start an animation when you press a button and end it when the animation is over, which is about 1% of what goes into programming a move in a game. You need to know what those other things are in order to ask about them, and you also need to be able to identify when it has actually succeeded.
Agreed. I feel like this is what most people are missing. If you're already a developer it's an amazing tool (because the inputs are going to be good). But, if you're not a developer it doesn't do much because when (not if) a copy-paste from chatGPT breaks something, the person providing input can't determine if the code is wrong or if the input is wrong, or if there are conditions in the code overriding new code, etc.
Current state, it's a condensensed and better stackoverflow (for a ton of industries, not just software eng.)
Future state, who knows. But I don't believe it'll replace many people.
@@Ash-ng4mn So, AI won't replace developers?
@Thedarkflarekid I have used GPT 4 and 3 daily for a good while now, and it is like Neil said - a tool, nothing more or less. If you are a programmer, using it for advanced programming, you have to be knowledgeable enough to verify the output, otherwise your quality will be shit. And your prompts need to be so specific, that you might as well just come up with the solution yourself. It is a time saver for repetitive stupid stuff that no one likes to do anyway, so I really love it.
Neil is giving his opinion as a person who doesn't have to trade his skillset for income in order to survive. For 90% of us that do, there appears to be a reckoning coming.
People like him are totally detached from the reality of most people. He just looks at things on a macro level and say "we can do this" "we did this" "we have this" etc
But he's only referring to a small percentage of humanity when he says "we"
A very good reckoning, Ai is gonna help us take a sledgehammer to capitalism and toxic work culture. i mean do you know how bad that 08 financial crisis fucked us and keeps fucking us, its def gonna happen again and they're gonna get away with it...AGAIN.
AI is just a statistical operation. It's a predictive model based on a lot of input observations. It looks smart but it's fundamentally incapable of thinking outside the box, abstract thinking, etc. Neil has an excellent point when he says openAI can do things in the style of an artist, but it can't be the artist. It can write like known writers, it can create stories from existing stories, but it can't be a human brain.
It's a tool, just like cars, computers, etc that shifted the workforce a bit but it didn't cause mass unemployment
@@diverman1023
It's not like cars and computers at all. Unless you're talking about automated cars and computer systems.
The things you described such as "thinking outside the box, abstract thinking etc" are required in VERY FEW jobs. It's basically the creative jobs, like being an artist, musician, inventor, movie director etc
Most jobs require learning one or several things and repeating those things in a particular way.
They should give money to people that would be out of a job due to robots.. otherwise it doesn't make sense. Economy wouldn't survive.
Neil is the type of guy to hold the door open for himself and say thank you!
😂😂😂😂
😭dude
Sorry Neil is way above your intelligence.
You guys😂😂
🤣
Neil be asking 'okay whats your point'. He finally understands how we feel whenever he talks.
Really interesting, I do think the part about how ai doesn't come up with new ideas is true but we fail to see how because of letting ai do the hard stuff, We the ones that currate these things have more time to come up with mind bogeling ideas and concepts that we then can easily inject into our work and thinking instantly
Neil: “Can the chatbot record a podcast, No”
Patrick: “Can the chatbot write your next book and sell more”
😂😂😂
I thought this interviewer is awful. He asked Neil if he thinks an AI will replace him. Quite rude I thought.
@@user-il9qo4qc4n Neil is an egotistical wind bag who showed himself up throughout the interview. Especially with the lies and disinformation regarding the jab.
@@user-il9qo4qc4n It will replace him and every possible thought he can come up with.
I think it can. I had chat gpt write code in 4 languages in less than 10 minutes this week.
Man, for a scientist, NDT is SEVERELY closed minded
why?
He being a scientist should be close minded to non-scientist's ideas on science.
@@DJVARAO He seems ignorant on the way AI is going to change everything we do,it happens a lot with old people and new technologies.He does not seem to embrace change,neither adapt to it
Go watch Bill maher literally silence him when they were discussing covid
Scientists are objective, based on data.
The Descript platform is a really good effort to do this podcast. Also platforms like Poison AI and BHuman Ai are really good attempts at cloning you.
Interviewer asks some basic questions, Neil does a good job of explaining ramifications. There’s a whole layer of conversation about neural nets / transformers that most people are just skimming over in the media
There is NO reason to fear AI. PLEASE understand Van Gough did not just make art that "looked nice" he made art that reflected his emotional state. We relate to PEOPLES emotional states, because we ourselves are emotional creatures. This has to be real and coming from another person for it to be real, for it to FEEL real. If you know it came from an AI then you will know that the art wasnt coming from a genuine place. Sure you might be able to relate to it in your own way,, but it will always be a little more shallow knowing that it came from an AI an not from a real person. Because its that persons story behind the camera, behind the painting that we relate to. Its not just the painting itself.... :)))
And thats why AI can never replace us in writing, art or anything creative for that matter.
IF this makes sense this please copy / pasta to other people there seems to be a big misconception around this. We are emotional beings not logical beings! AI is fundamentally logical not emotional! Thats the difference. And there is no need to worry if society starts to value and appreciate this in a bigger way, this should be common knowledge, otherwise yes people will freak out for no reason like usual... :)))
YES
This podcast gave a new insight about AI, it changed my mind, i'm less worried now
Very nice. Thanks for this clip.
The thing is that the way society is structured, people are more concerned with surviving than learning. It’s hard to spend time learning when your literally worried about food in your mouth and a roof over your head.
You think? Should they risk starving and living a miserable life to pursue your arcadian view of learning?
@@TheLincolnrailsplitt I’m not claiming to know the answers but I’m positive that what I’m saying is a factor. Things are different for everyone. Also you just assume that what I’m saying is to harm people when it’s actually the opposite. And actually I do think it’s worth risking it all for a cause you truly believe in. It seems in this world the only way to combat people with Arcadian thoughts of “ freedom” like yourself is by fighting for what you believe in or tyrants with thought processes like yourself will reign supreme! Does that answer your question rail licker?
Agreed. Knowledge is not prioritized in our modern day society.
And not everybody has the opportunity to learn and innovate
@@TheLincolnrailsplitt , the highest priority for anything is survival. We have not evolved beyond that.
@@TheLincolnrailsplitt I think that the point he is making is that we already have the solutions to survival, so why set up society (or allow society to self perpetuate) a lack of survivability?
I agree so much with cheating being stupid...when I took network engineering and did the 4 hours of homework a day the other students were sharing answers to pass..because I didn't cheat I ended up getting 2 certifications and if it wasn't for how much the vouchers cost I would've tried for 2 more...I left that class confident knowing my field enough to be offered good jobs after being interviewed and proving I know my stuff...meanwhile a majority of my old classmates couldn't get a job at all...I used to tell them you can't fake I/T because at the end of the day you have to be able to work with the equipment and solve issues that may come up. How can you do any repairs, installations of networks and solving software problems if you never learned it? I believe the amount of work given at schools and the pressure to succeed creates professionals who don't know what they are doing..and that's any field I'm just using my field as an example...
It's true, but it depends heavily on the field. There's a lot of useless fields where faking answers and not learning anything won't matter because the work isn't that important to begin with, and I forget what it's called but there's some principle about how in every company 20% of the employees are doing 80% of the work and the other 80% of employees are just coasting on minimal effort. In the pandemic we kind of saw this too with so many people being out of work but on the whole not that much really changed. So many jobs are useless, just props to facilitate the illusion that money has any value or meaning, so that those who print it can keep us in chains of their own devising.
Will networks eventually repair themselves and make you and what you learned obsolete?
Your job is one of the many that is on the verge of being replaced by AI. I’m case you didn’t know already
@@user-nz4ux4cw2z lol ai won't replace my job...I've used ai to diagnose issues at the cable company..it has its limitations and you still need me to run the ethernet cables, install the computers install the server, what did you think networking was, it's not just administration a majority involves physical installation of equipment.ai might be used to cover software issues but unless we are using robots with enough intelligence to go to a site and hook everything up then my job will still exist..I don't see ai robots like in the movie I robot for a longtime and not every company will be able to afford multi million dollar robots to replace their workforce anytime soon plus for every advancement in I/T you need guys like me to make sure it stays functional that includes AI.this is an evolving field that's why I stay learning new things whether it's programming, I/T security or even electronics repair. A piece of intelligent software isn't going to replace the bad capacitors on your laptop when the motherboard fails and you take it to a repair shop.. sure in like 25 maybe 30 years we might have affordable AI robots but who is going to service them? AI isn't close enough to threaten my job while I can still work...but my job was an example used to demonstrate how faking your way through wouldn't allow you to succeed in a real life setting..I could've been a doctor, or accountant and if I cheated through my courses I wouldn't be able to effectively do my job. That was the point...
@@modesto885 yes but not anytime soon. .networking is a majority of physical labor the administration portion is only part of it...Show me AI software that can run plenum cable overhead to another room and connect it to 4 pc's, so my job overtime will have less to do maybe and even then who installs and configures the AI software..we already use IDS and IPS which are intrusion detection systems and intrusion prevention systems but they give false positives a lot of the time and we need to monitor them and calibrate them. So we already use AI to monitor and even prevent certain behaviors on systems but you still need humans whether it's to ensure they work correctly ir to physically install everything.. so no I don't feel that my job will be replaced by self healing networks anytime soon. If anything AI will be a tool that we will use to enhance our abilities to ensure function and security...I've been working with computers since the 90s and I've seen lots of tech change and evolve but if there is one thing I've learned in all that time is you will always need someone like me to fix it when it's not working the way it should because no tech is perfect..
Thank you for these thoughts! I’d considered this whole thing more pessimistic before I watched this video. Thank you!
Fair point on what tyson said about advice from parents. When living with my grandparents my grandfather kept telling me "save your change and put it in the bank, the interst will pay for college.". Yeah thanks gramps but the interest would barely pay for a soda.
Why is Neil so combative when asked simple questions?
right, why is his demeanor, tone and attitude aggressive like he wants Pat to slam his back out
Because people who are smart look down and think everyone else is an idiot so they have this ego
Because he's better than you. Much better.
That's a good question. Probably has something to do with his wife's boyfriend.
@@steveo2226 😂
It is unbelievable indeed, been working in IT for 30 years and this is the most revolutionary thing I've seen.
How does this impact the IT sector?
If it's so evolutionary why can't it tell me how to get rich lol j/k
@@MotherPlaneRCthis will likely replace a lot of SOC jobs.
remember what people said about the internet /google.
its a higher level of google ......
people should be thinking about who will hold the keys to the kingdom and invest in the company (Microsoft)
@@nocapnobs7845 It can to a degree but everyone else has the same answer so its answer loses value.
Gpt 3 is always live on the playground... The chat version is the one that gets put down, you can actually use it in the playground whenever (and more in depth)
Being in school now is never about learning
school = torture
Maybe in their youths school used to be fun and about learning but now school is about passing and then after that you don't know how your life is gonna be. (If anyone wants to debate feel free to)
It doesn't matter if you are smart or not. It's not even a matter of proving it is a matter of getting things done as quickly and competitively as you can.
Productivity!
i agree but quality is also a thing
It doesn’t matter if your are smart? Ok have your kid have children with dumb ppl. Lol
Ya basically. You can choose not to use this as a tool but someone else will and they will be more efficient
Yeah this partly true but we also pay for the human element of a service whether it is entertainment or day to day service providers.
Asking the right questions is valued more than having all the answers. Thats what is happening.
bingo
You put it beautifully, thank you. Any particular place where you got that insight?
@@lolislayer1643 asked chatGPT
@@lolislayer1643 The faster you get the the right question, the faster these tools respond with the results you need. So having creativity and ability for “prompting” is a new requirement for integrating these tools into a workflow. Same as knowing the right formulas to use in math despite a calculator doing the leg-work.
@@marcusthompson666 Yea absolutely. What I wanted to know was is there any site or person that went in depth with the idea of asking the right questions being the valuable asset in the age of AI. Sorry for my poor wording
My colleague Hugo Martín previously reported on the battle between California and Florida when it comes to tourism. The two states had very different strategies for handling the pandemic: California adopted aggressive policies like social distancing and closures to prevent the spread, while Florida didn’t.
As a result, California had fewer infections. But Florida did manage to surpass California in three key tourism vitality indicators: total travel spending, hotel occupancy rates and the number of airline seats on planes bringing in visitors (however, at no point did Florida bring in more revenue than California).
I tried a few Chat GPT conversations. The AI doesn't know everything and, in fact, it responded that it learned from our discussion regarding housing prices and social structures. It has access to as much information as we humans do, and can gather it faster, but it has limitations.
Bro, it’s limited because the company who put it to public is making it limited, the version that they have and use internally there is no limit to it
@@nourhanbalian3294 it's shackled yes. It should be imo until we have regulation in place
Neil, the type of guy that will make you forget your question after 10 seconds of answering it.
Lmfao why was this so funny
*forget
😂
This is good😂😂
😂
The problem with adapting to the future job market is that not everyone is built to be a programmer or an engineer, and that seems to be where things are heading.
The AI can code and engineer better and faster than humans, though. So that's not really where the job market is heading, because AI can come up with coded solutions much quicker. You may have a tech lead overseeing AI coders, feeding them parameters and workflow paradigms while they produce the actual code. You completely eleminate the need for actual coders, other than if they can come up with new coding functions for the AI to use.
Actually the opposite of what you said. AI is potentially making coding available to everyone because a non coder can just ask the ai to write the code for them.
Also, it’s those jobs that are theeatened not the regular jobs that require human interraction and human labor.
@@bigheadrhino is a coder that uses google still a coder?
Cops will be in demand as most people become desperate.
Neil brings up some good points we should not be so quick to use AI I think he right we need to do the work learn the fundamentals. Our society is so quick to replace people 😪 but I think we are not ready. We still need and want to learn etc. I appreciate any good feedback.
I learned the game from being denied and I’m glad actually that’s the best thing they did too me made me make myself self incorporated
'whats your point? I'm excited!' the man who just sees this podcast as a contentious argument
Pat should of just went in on that clown. Pat should of just told him, i have a problem with your aggressive demeanor, attitude and ill slam your back out!
I hope they never bring that clown back on....
what my point?...the implications and possibilities an not including the ones we cant even think of sitting right here. You dont have all the answers...thats what pat should have said which would have hurt his big ass ego and pride.
@@salt7582 lol relax
@@DHEspana lol tell him to relax lol
I went to engineering school. I was stunned to realize that I was one of the ONLY people out of hundreds who didn't CHEAT. The reason? The teachers hated teaching us- they just wanted to do their research, get paid and patent something that would make them rich. Teaching was the thing they hated the most. I had two teachers who could actually teach, the rest sucked. In that case it made sense to a lot of people to cheat.
I had the same exact experience at Arizona state university
Very similar experience. Two degrees, most professors wanted to get out of the room interacting with as few students as possible. I taught but it was adjunct faculty and liked talking to students. Ditto some faculty especially those who haven’t burned out
Very similar experience. Two degrees, most professors wanted to get out of the room interacting with as few students as possible. I taught but it was adjunct faculty and liked talking to students. Ditto some faculty especially those who haven’t burned out
Same in Pakistan. I thought you guys were better 😭
We had a couple of lecturers at the University of Bath in England that you could tell didn't enjoy, or weren't naturally good at the teaching side. But 90% were very helpful, and would give as much of their time as you wanted. I guess we were lucky.
This is really a great conversation
While Al has made significant advancements in recent years, it still has limitations when it comes to decision making in complex, politically charged, and socially impactful systems like international lobbying, banking, and the monetary system. These systems require a deep understanding of human behavior, social norms, and political dynamics, which Al currently lacks. Additionally, the ethical considerations involved in such decisions require a level of human judgement that Al has not yet achieved. For the time being, Al is better suited to assist human decision makers rather than replace them.
PLEASE I think there is a big thing missing here, please understand Van Gough did not just make art that "looked nice" he made art that reflected his emotional state. We relate to PEOPLES emotional states, because we ourselves are emotional creatures. This has to be real and coming from another person for it to be real, for it to FEEL real. If you know it came from an AI then you will know that the art wasnt coming from a genuine place. Sure you might be able to relate to it in your own way, but it will always be a little more shallow knowing that it came from an AI an not from a real person. Because its that persons story behind the camera, behind the painting that we relate to. Its not just the painting itself....
And thats why AI can never replace us in writing, art or anything creative for that matter.
IF this makes sense this please copy / pasta to other people there seems to be a big misconception around this. We are emotional beings not logical beings! AI is fundamentally logical not emotional! Thats the difference. And there is no need to worry if society starts to value and appreciate this in a bigger way, this should be common knowledge, otherwise yes people will freak out for no reason like usual...
yes!!!!!!!
Since Neil has a reply for literally everything he might be the first AI prototype himself
Why is that a problem? Like aren’t people suppose to have answers in interviews? I think y’all are lowkey racist bad mouthing this guy. He’s literally the same as all the other talking head scientists, just black. Lol
Who cares about race? He is a freaking genius! Intelligence does not have race, gender, etc etc. Humans rock! We will never be fully replaced by AI.
Projecting your education or lack there of on 1 of our great scholars is hilarious
@@whyneed1215 this guy has a superiority complex he’s full of himself just loves to be right and corrects everything he possibly can he’s a asshole and is treated like it nothing to do w race
It would destroy itself for the “greater good” of Society!
what camera's they are using
It's incredible how smart Neil is and short sighted at the same time... He can't see people will get bored on the beach quickly and will need to find a sense of worth. Telling 50 year olds "just to stay flexible" after getting replaced by A.I. sounds very easy to say...
Yes, you are exactly right. I for example took a more fulfilling job that pays less than my last job. While economically a "wrong" choice, it's made my life better. Not having a sense of accomplishment is really horrible for most people.
He gives me the same impression. After experiencing what the current iteration of ChatGPT can do, it is difficult not to worry about the pace of the technological advancement. We cannot forget that OpenAI isn't the only company working on an AI. While we're focusing on OpenAI, we don't see all other entities working in the background.
I haven't seen much smart stuff from him.
My impression is that he meant it as an expression for extended leisure time, and time in general to pursue other things
@@cassidy318 Bingo. Ask 100 people the same question and you will get various answers because people have different views or thinking ways or perceive the question depending on their character , intelligence level or even mood that they are in at that moment.
I have been looking to invest part of my savings incrypto. Just don't know how to get started. Not about to take a loss on my savings..
_The one effective technique I'm confident nobody admits to using, is staying in touch with an Investment-Adviser. Based on firsthand encounter, I can say for certain their skillsets are topnotch, I've raised over $700k since 2017. Just bought my 3rd property for rental. Credit to Rodger Michael Karl.. my Investment-Adviser...
I also invested with Rodger M. Karl and I made my placement in ETH.I'm not surprised you say he helps you too. his good name speak for itself. He has been doing so well in my Investment
Please how to reach him ?
Cripto and AI are different
Again for tyson dude AI can do podcasts but will need a human to put it as much togueter
Why is there no audio in this video?
18:52 Okay this was the one time I laughed at a Neil joke!!😂😂
It’s truly amazing that when people like Neil are sooooo bound to the material world, they’ve completely lost in spiritual awareness and thus he is the most close-minded ignorant type of human.
👏👏👏👏
It’s just him. Most academics/intellectuals are open minded and give interesting insights on these topics.
@@martinjackson909 @Martin Jackson don't let this little interview fool you. Neil hosted a conversation ai, agi and the like 4 years ago with other fellow scientists.
ruclips.net/video/gb4SshJ5WOY/видео.html
He also hosted another asking if we are living in a simulation 6 years ago
ruclips.net/video/xgESzc3hc2U/видео.html
Yeah, he's the guy who firmly believe the 'statistics' b.s. the authorities used to feed us during the pandemic.
@@tunesmithlab8277 So you dont "believe" hard facts and data. Who is close minded one?
With markets tumbling, inflation soaring, the Fed imposing large interest-rate hike, while treasury yields are rising rapidly-which means more red ink for portfolios this quarter. How can I profit from the current volatile market, I'm still at a crossroads deciding if to liquidate my $125k bond/stocck portfolio
Focus on two key objectives. First, stay protected by learning when to sell stocks to cut losses and capture profits. Second, prepare to profit when the market turns around.I recommend you seek the guidance a broker or financial advisor.
@@emilybrown2719 Please can you leave the info of your investment advisor here? I’m in dire need for one.
@@gracesdonny1532 My advisor is "Susan Agnes Hancock" You can easily look her up, she has years of financial market experience.
@@emilybrown2719 I looked up Susan using her full name and found her web-page, read through her resume, educational background, qualifications and it was really impressive. She is a fiduciary who will act in my best interest. So, I sent a message and hopefully she responds soon.
Stock, Mr Jimmy can help you… he gets me high returns with zero risk..
As I remember, I told this people over phone about Artifical Time and Ar and hence AI can be manuplated and as I have always been saying that I need to make sure that independent
If it can write code computing that's game changing. I've been around coders, and they work 15+ hours on average.
He's doing such a good job arguing why no one should listen to him.
100
He's usually right.
Damn 😂😂
I've never been so convinced after a podcast that I didn't want to read a guy's book.
Truth is frustrating i kno
The problem with the solution of "just find something else to do" is that whatever else is out there may not hold the same market value as the job a person had that has now been replaced. My local Walmart use to have 20+ cashiers at all times but now I only see maybe 4 tops watching over the self-checkouts. What happened to those 16 people? Walmart will tell you that they simply relocated the employees to other job positions, but I can tell you that many of these people simply fell out of the work environment because that was all they were good at.
@@ThomasVWorm theres no such thing like climate change crisis. Its made up concept to subjugate masses of peasants.
A harsh but accurate way of looking at it is that this is evolution, and you either evolve or die.
@@positivelydark My real issue is this: Are we doing a disservice by taking away jobs that can easily be replaced if it means one less job with market value is available? We really should find ways to empower people to do work that doesn't have market value but is still valuable. For example, my therapy groups offer art classes to people as therapy, but they are always short on volunteers. I would like to think we could get to a system where a person could actually do something beneficial for their community without worry about what the market value is.
@@sweetfeathery That is a great question and I wish I could answer it.
@@ThomasVWorm i rather be nuts than follow the agenda. Just answer me this, why airlines will be subjected to carbon tax but not private jets. Yes one rule for us and one for them.
I wish we lived in a world where the world leaders and governments actually wanted to help people; a world where we all work together and helped each other. And where huge inventions were used to help the world, instead of to control people and make everything worse. That would be lovely - I’m dreamin
me too friend… me too. may god or whoever hear you
Dear host, did you read that paper or the song, or the code... Chat gpt made?
I love how he explained how AI will beat us all at Basketball
Basketball isnt even a problem
Dr Tyson always sets the conversation by establishing that he is the smartest guy in the room. From then on, the interview shifts to his control.
I thin k he's making excellent points in this clip. His style of "conversation" is a bit aggressive and asshole-ish, but whatever. I don't need him to be Martha Stewart. He's an interesting cat.
Neil is too ignorant in want of understanding how Patrick Bet-David is in authority all the time.
@@keenannorris3309 He's making a lot of REALLY poor points too though...he has no clue about this area, but seems to think he is an expert on it.
@@tosvus After listening to the whole interview, I agree w/ you that his breezy optimism on AI is pretty near-sighted and out of touch.
I did find the interview, overall, interesting. NDT is abrasive and he thinks he's an expert on a lot of things outside astrophysics which he clearly isn't, but he's still better informed and much more articulate than most people, including the interviewers.
@@tosvus I agree, he does not understand generalization well enough to argue.
Generalization, in this case, would literally mean making new ideas out of multiple ideas it knows, no one invented the wheel completely, there was a circle before.
I learned coding in python to analyse user feedback, I was able to do the word count and sentiment analysis. With no previous coding experience. Best teacher ever. I learned so much, you can ask all the stupid questions
same, it's amazing tool.
Well ai can just write all the code for you now
@@tensor9470 lol not really
@@rafalos-zx6go Works pretty well at writing code, can only get better
Most students don't come to school to study at all. Most of the real learning comes from outside the school and school just makes you memorise things.
Neil is correct. Understanding the subject is of greater value than an exam grade. Job interviewers are not interested in grades their interest is what value you offer to them and the organisation.
Yes you can use Chat GPT to fast track results, but I actually think it is far more valuable as a tool for learning and expediting processes.
I use it as a assistant and a teacher pretty cool tbh.
It can write music notes.
Never thought I’d say Neil lacks imagination, but he definitely does when it comes to the destructive potential of artificial intelligence
The problem with AI theories is there is too much imagination. It borders on fantasy. They imagine a robot voice from the 80s with the goal of human death. They fail to see that this platform we are using right now already uses AI tech. AI is a tool. Self-awareness even among people is questionable at best.
Neil is smart enough to understand technology is moving along with or without our approval.
He said he can sit back on the beach if AI does all the work. What he did not think of is WHO the AI works for... it sure won't work for him if the creators of the AI keep it all private.
Vladimir Putin has said that whoever leads in AI will rule the world.
You mean the guy that called people who saw UFOs crazy only to walk it back after CIA admits they were real in 2021???
I use ChatGPT as a tool. The code I take 30 mins to produce, CGPT makes in a few seconds. It isn't always correct, but if you know what questions to ask you can correct it. Work smarter, not harder. If you are replaced, your job was redundant. If I am replaced as a software dev, I will learn QA or whatever is required in the field to advance.
I think that if AI can write your term paper it can also be trained to detect a cheat. It should be able to recognize if AI created a paper or if a student created it or if AI created it and a student modified it.
I've asked OpenAI what the dangers of AI are.. pretty interesting response. "Accountability" is the main issue. Connecting it with military tech is another factor which has to be looked at.
Hahahahaha naive, it is military technology 😅 there’s nothing to connect, that’s the equivalent to thinking NASA is a independent government space agency and not a arm of the military. Military runs the world, the tec, economy and think tanks that keep the world spinning lol, there’s no other way to do it.. military conquest is what has made the world and life so amazing and easy today.
@@azysheff No OpenAI is not military tech. You apparently know all your stuff from reading chemtrails.. I'm aware of the lobbies that control the stuff behind the curtains, but the concept of Ai, can be brought to life by anyone who's able to code properly, no military has a monopoly on it.. OF COURSE the military complex has resources to research and develop AI,... They aren't the ones who are making big changes in the online market right now though, that's OpenAI, DeepL ect.
While people still talk about TikTok, RUclips, FB, Twitter ect. And think "Alexa" or "Siri" are Ai...
As brilliant as Neil is as he’s talking and describing getting diplomas without earning them ect and basically a complete society of cheaters… he really genuinely doesn’t see the problem and danger of this new wave of AI? Seriously?
He does. He is paid off to follow an agenda
He is an academic! A literate Servant of a system who has never had a real job in his life. He thinks AI will replace him and he can just go to the beach! Or create TikTok video! Hey Niel; show me your contract!
The danger you see is based on the 80s fantasy of killer computers. People also thought electricity was alive and would eventually kill its users. Are you scared your computer will attack you? This speaks more toward the mentally of the people rather than the actual AI tool. Just like most people all AI can do is what it's told it can do.
@@socalrefrigeration548 that’s an incredibly ignorant comparison and comment some of the most brilliant minds the world has ever seen have been saying for years this is a very dangerous road we are headed down. Comparing electricity to a AI that can basically blur the entire line of reality within the human race is laughable. But nice try your over simplification is not gonna work on this one
He’s insufferable
I just made a Spanish homework with 60 words 10 sentences bout what you will do with a million dollars and in 20 seconds I have now pre started homework done.
I think he was trying to ask or state about if an AI was capable of using all your past habits and doings to create an estimated outcome that you would’ve done in the future
This video is a masterclass in self-control.
Please understand Van Gough did not just make art that "looked nice" he made art that reflected his emotional state. We relate to PEOPLES emotional states, because we ourselves are emotional creatures. This has to be real and coming from another person for it to be real, for it to FEEL real. If you know it came from an AI then you will know that the art wasnt coming from a genuine place. Sure you might be able to relate to it in your own way, but it will always be a little more shallow knowing that it came from an AI an not from a real person. Because its that persons story behind the camera, behind the painting that we relate to. Its not just the painting itself..
And thats why AI can never replace us in writing, art or anything creative for that matter.
IF this makes sense this please copy / pasta to other people there seems to be a big misconception around this. We are emotional beings not logical beings! AI is fundamentally logical not emotional! Thats the difference. And there is no need to worry if society starts to value and appreciate this in a bigger way, this should be common knowledge, otherwise yes people will freak out for no reason like usual. :))))
@@justaguyinasuitxx yessssssssssssss
@@justaguyinasuitxx Creativity and emotions CAN be replicated by AI, it may not be "organic", but it is more than enough for humans not to notice the difference, we might be complex creatures for modern technology, but anything a human can do, a machine can too, it just takes time to achieve those levels of development, but not as long as many people think. The main bottlenecks in the Machine Learning industry right now are skilled personnel and shortage of high-quality data.
@@justaguyinasuitxx *gets fired in 6 months because his job got automated by GPT-4*
@@gil-evens well I am a Aqua Cast Support Diver so i should be good until the robots are actually walking around and shit lol
My three favorite channels: Valuetainment, Stock Brotha, & Zip Trader. Make my week complete.
Thank you
But open ai isnt a stock you can buy yet is it?
You comment this on every video
Stop commenting this, no one cares
@@DHEspana hes a BOT? On an AI video. The fkn irony 😂
Neil deGrasse Tyson is the best. What a wonderful Teacher. Thank You !
If we lived for hundreds of years, I'd agree, but how are we supposed to adapt when changes are happening so fast? I'm 31 and interested in becoming a programmer. I've always liked spending time in front of a computer screen but I have zero knowledge in IT. It could take me years to actually become a programmer (if I become one at all because it looks so complicated, I feel too dumb to even start). I'm tired of being a manual labourer when I know I have the brains for something more, but if I'm going to spend years learning something, only for that knowledge to be obsolete, then what? Spend more years learning something else, only for it to be replaced by ai again? Idk about you, guys, but I don't think I'll live for 500 years. It's just so frustrating sometimes.
You could become a programmer linked to building, testing and improving AI?
I already know of a lot of programmers that think about solutions so quickly, but it takes them a day or two to build and test the code. An AI can do that rapidly for them and they check it over.
What did those in the car factories do when the robots were introduced for building the cars? They serviced the machines and did intricate work on trim that machines couldn't do as well as a human
Neil doesn't understand the brevity of this huge leap in technology. I think he's not alone. This is absolutely revolutionary in terms of possible applications that will come from this.
Omg, its a demo man lmao. MS is wasting their money. Full stop.
Enlighten us
you dont really understand what you are talking about
He hasn't used it and that's the key.
You have to experience ChatGPT to realize what kind of big deal it is.
Nlp still doesnt truly emulate rational thought in a more classical way like when we think. It essentially predicts the next word based on the previous words from the prompt and the previous words in the answer. We are still miles away from AGI and although there will be many companies that use chatgpt to make their own niche products most of these companies will probably fail within the first 3 years.
I like the example of the farmers that were replaced by machines and had to adapt themselves throughout the time but, I think things are different nowadays. Changes are happening too fast and my concern is if people is gonna have enough time to adapt to new era or, change their careers for example.
Saturation is, people not seeing. When technologies and tools came in first, it was like big space to grow over but now that seems to be shrinking. Demand is not scaling up in proportion to people willing to do the job with help of tools
The best way to "adapt", is to become self sufficient so it won't matter. People are worried about losing jobs? Learn to produce/acquire your own food, and build your own shelter, then the job doesn't matter. Everyone is so afraid these days because we've become entirely dependent on the system we live within, and we've been raised purely as consumers with no idea how to produce anything for ourselves.
@@TheOnlyGhxst you have bright perspective
@@TheOnlyGhxst the best way to adapt is to take the wealthy elites stuff. you really think it'd be fair they get to live in castles while the rest of workers, who made the contributions necessary to create the AI that will replace us, have to live in tents and hunt for food?
@@TheOnlyGhxst most people dont want to just produce food and sleep. they want to get a good life, and living a more expensive lifestyle require more than just producing foods. for example with my current job i am able to travel a lot and stay in resorts. i doubt UBI allows me to do that
At 11:50, makes the statement then looks through your soul lol
My Amazon Kindle Paperwhite's cover? The Starry Night. Cool. 😎
To me this is like how a calculator replaced the need to do maths in your head. You still need to work out what you need to create
Exactly!
Brilliant comment!
It's a slow subtle effect people will not notice for years, then be helpless.
Except no cute little wall-e robot to amuse you.
Yes, but if you the see the full picture and history you will miss, with a one on one comparisson like this, that the history of manking has moved inmensely in abstraction after abstraction. This can go on until eventually all phisical work is automated, and production is done automatically, leaving hughe ripples in labour markets in the short term. Of course, someone will need to tell the machine what to do, the problem is if 2,3, machines effectively replace 10,000 people in the long-run ath the end of the next 15 year period.
@@flowers134 that is true, however, we are entering a population collapse in the next 10-20 years where the pop of the west will at least halve. So AI is really coming just in time to stop mass starvation, as broad acre farming and petroleum based fertilizer did after world war II. Also, in 1988 at the age of 11, I ploughed 10,000 acres over a couple of weeks. In 1954 my father saw the old Clydesdale horses that his father used to use get replaced by little tractors which were about 100x faster than the horse, but still orders of magnitude slower than what I was doing in the 80s. Now with GPS and automated machines, it is far more efficient than when I was farming with dad in the 80s. Back then our operation fed 60000 people a year with 4 people working.
Yet now, every industry I'm connected with, they are desperate for people and we have a massive labour shortage.
The average IQ, contrary to popular belief, is also lowering, so having more technical jobs taken by AI won't be a problem. It is needed, as there will be far less capable people to populate those fields.
There will be plenty to do.
I just wanted to tell you that I enjoy your podcast very much. I learn a lot and appreciate that people have different opinions and the variety of guests you have on here.
ChatGPT actually CAN write music i.e. "Write chord progressions for a pop song including an intro, verses, choruses, and an outro." It will give you chords such as Gminor A7, etc.
That count from sesame street laugh LOL ah ah ah ah ah
I don't fear AI, i fear what human psychopaths can do with it
Correct
bingo. AI will never ever do the wrong, it will always be a human behind it, deciding that a certain action is allright and accepted.
True
@@nimmha6708 History tells me it will be used against humanity sooner rather than later
There is NO reason to fear AI. PLEASE understand Van Gough did not just make art that "looked nice" he made art that reflected his emotional state. We relate to PEOPLES emotional states, because we ourselves are emotional creatures. This has to be real and coming from another person for it to be real, for it to FEEL real. If you know it came from an AI then you will know that the art wasnt coming from a genuine place. Sure you might be able to relate to it in your own way,, but it will always be a little more shallow knowing that it came from an AI an not from a real person. Because its that persons story behind the camera, behind the painting that we relate to. Its not just the painting itself.... :)))
And thats why AI can never replace us in writing, art or anything creative for that matter.
IF this makes sense this please copy / pasta to other people there seems to be a big misconception around this. We are emotional beings not logical beings! AI is fundamentally logical not emotional! Thats the difference. And there is no need to worry if society starts to value and appreciate this in a bigger way, this should be common knowledge, otherwise yes people will freak out for no reason like usual... :)))
AI is going to make society either collapse or flourish. IMO, collapse because of human greed. I am a graphic designer and until a year ago, I never thought AI would be a problem for my career. Now, I am really wondering if in less than 10 years, I can continue doing my job. I just played with ChatGPT and that is also crazy. We are embarking in a wild ride and many people are going to feel the pain.
Software engineer here. Also suddenly worried about my career over the next 10 years
Agreed, I always assumed the creative jobs would be safe, but actually AI is kicked off with concept art and creative writing. So in 10 years we are looking at all art, articles, code, and drivers being replaced by AI, with all fast food replaced by robots. Hard to see this ending well for society.
First it was immigrants, now Ai what’s next 👾😂👽🛸👽 I luv it!
You're going to need to learn new stuff naturally.
But human greed is why our lives are better today than our ancestors. Otherwise... We have over 100K years of humanity living in what would today be considered extreme poverty.
@@Leto2ndAtreides Poverty is relative, someone in poverty in the US is possibly wealthy elsewhere or in another time. In a vacuum if there was no greed you would have no poverty technically because everyone would want roughly the same amount.
9:05 actually everything that can be write as been written and it's online.
It's called babel library.. learned about it on vsauce
I appreciate Neil for almost always bringing up farming. It's a great example of modernization of technology and he understands its importance.
Its not the same thing.
farming is manual labor, you can do other manual labor.
Tech job we take like 3 months to reskill. Spent 40 k school loans just to get fed by chatgpt.
Neil is the type of guy who will answer any question thrown at him with such theatrical confidence, that so many people think to themselves, "He MUST be right." The more videos of him that I watch the more I find this to be true
I give up him regarding some of these topics
Yea classical narcissist. A little close minded. He will be shocked in a few decades.
NGT is a bottomless pit of useless opinions. He is entitled to those opinions but he speaks as though his PhD entitles him to an air of authority that it does not. The irony is listening to him pontificate on opinions. The more animated he is the less he knows.
shout-out to NDT
There is also a confusion over being accomplished in a subject and his perceived expertise in everything. I heard him once say we must trust the science in everything and then in another podcast contradict biologists as to when life begins and what a man and woman are.