Just finished part 1 and 2, I think users should see the roommates first before they select the room since the problem we are focusing on are trying to find friends's of the friends or simliar people to room together. Search location to find people are looking for roommates in the same place, then filter preferences. The results of the people you found will be someone looking for the same things as you. then integrate Chat in it, and start messaging, get to know each other and later on explore some rooms together. What I think the potential challenge can be will be the messaging part. How to communicate , or how designers can help 2 parties to communicate effectly so they can make sure they are what each others' are looking for.
I was thinking it would be really useful to maybe have an indicator on how far the room/apartment was from the university if this app was to target university students. I’m a beginner here but thought I’d share my thoughts. Regardless this was really helpful!
Hi, Soy, I have one question, for the problem define stage, sometimes there can be more than one person, if so, should we list all personas out there? ( I'm a bit worried about the time constraints) If we have to, do we have to list most of them? I'm thinking of making one with details like in this video, and the other one just names the persona with some basic description of needs. Or What I'm thinking is, do not have a persona. I could possibly write general user characteristics, which just specify some needs? My main concern is if I list personas, the interviewers might have questions and not agree with some of the personas, also within a little time I might not be able to spot most of them? Diving too deep into one persona might also bring some questions, like why did you choose this persona? In this video, I can see there are two journeys, which makes the challenge quite intense. Can you just pick one journey rather than both of them? meaning you focus on one persona only,?
He didn't even tell to do any research on potential users, so how can he give so many options based only on assumptions? He didn't ask about business objectives. And he didn't clarified success metrics. Quite bad...
In a whiteboarding exercise you are supposed to make assumptions (and in many cases, you are supposed to do that in real life projects as well), your interviewer would guide you if they want to clarify, nothing wrong with that.
Much appreciated. Excellent pointers.
Just finished part 1 and 2, I think users should see the roommates first before they select the room since the problem we are focusing on are trying to find friends's of the friends or simliar people to room together. Search location to find people are looking for roommates in the same place, then filter preferences. The results of the people you found will be someone looking for the same things as you. then integrate Chat in it, and start messaging, get to know each other and later on explore some rooms together.
What I think the potential challenge can be will be the messaging part. How to communicate , or how designers can help 2 parties to communicate effectly so they can make sure they are what each others' are looking for.
Design an app to help students find roommates is not a problem statement but rather an order. It’s not UX, it’s dictatorship
This has been really helpful!
Thank you for sharing! Really useful
Glad to know that it was helpful!
Thanks for sharing, this is very helpful!
Glad that it was helpful!
Superduuuuper helpful Soy! Thanks!
I was thinking it would be really useful to maybe have an indicator on how far the room/apartment was from the university if this app was to target university students. I’m a beginner here but thought I’d share my thoughts. Regardless this was really helpful!
That’s a very good point! Thanks for sharing :)
Hi, Soy, I have one question, for the problem define stage, sometimes there can be more than one person, if so, should we list all personas out there? ( I'm a bit worried about the time constraints) If we have to, do we have to list most of them? I'm thinking of making one with details like in this video, and the other one just names the persona with some basic description of needs.
Or What I'm thinking is, do not have a persona. I could possibly write general user characteristics, which just specify some needs? My main concern is if I list personas, the interviewers might have questions and not agree with some of the personas, also within a little time I might not be able to spot most of them? Diving too deep into one persona might also bring some questions, like why did you choose this persona? In this video, I can see there are two journeys, which makes the challenge quite intense. Can you just pick one journey rather than both of them? meaning you focus on one persona only,?
thanks for sharing ，very helpful
He didn't even tell to do any research on potential users, so how can he give so many options based only on assumptions? He didn't ask about business objectives. And he didn't clarified success metrics. Quite bad...
I've seen you gave him feedback about these points in he second part. Good!
In a whiteboarding exercise you are supposed to make assumptions (and in many cases, you are supposed to do that in real life projects as well), your interviewer would guide you if they want to clarify, nothing wrong with that.
@@samuelshen3071 idk if does are things you're supposed to make assumptions on..
@@aris_-rj7rg whiteboard challenges are to see HOW you think they are not about be perfect at research or solving the problem
What is that timer feature in FIgma? how can I also set a timer in figma?
It's a feature you could find in the drop down menu of the "Collaborate" icon on the top right of a canvas
dude never had credit score lol
Me either 🥵