Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective videos ruclips.net/p/PLEMWqyRZP_LrdqB-XbqY2LocUVEaG_w7D Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective-Air videos ruclips.net/p/PLEMWqyRZP_LrGyENf3nqsYKC9ZkWH414k
I can't stop but be intrigued by the fact that Taiwan created its indigenous fighter aircraft in the time when no country even considered their existence.... kudos AIDC 🇹🇼👏🥰
Currently, AIDC and Chungshan Tech Institute are working on a new design called "Advanced Defense Fighter" which reportedly based on F35 and F/A-18E/F Super Hornet.
@@yutkijsamnong3202 Not only that, AIDC and Chungshan Tech Institute are working on follow up project called "Advanced Defense Fighter" which reportedly based on F35 and F/A-18 E/F Super Hornet.
@@ReviveHF 123 Tejas on order and 30 already delivered..I don't call it a lost cause..Plus it's next version Tejas Mk2(rollout next yr) will replace mirages, mig 29s and jaguars of IAF..
@@ReviveHF Except for the timeline both Aircrafts are made for different roles and under differing circumstances. While Tejas was developed as an indigenous light fighter to replace the existing Mig 21, F Ck1 was formed as a result of China-US closeness & agreements to limit the sales of military hardware to Taiwan. Otherwise Taiwan has always been a traditional American Weapon buyer which was again evidently seen when they later brought the F16, Some of those orders ever given recently. They definitely did impressive production line with more than 130+ planes, i don't deny that, but its also true that they never had any option other than that either, If you read their history you'll find that after the limited series production, the initial order which was supposed to be given was 256, but that was dropped to present 130 as then taiwan was able to strike a deal for 150 Block 20 F16 from US. Whereas India never had that crisis even in 1980s India operated Mirages and later Mig 29s. Then we hv the aircraft technology itself the first model of F Ck 1 used American AN/APG 67 radar which is a much inferior radar compared to ELM 2032 radars of Tejas mk1 & Tejas Mk1a will hv Aesa radar. Fck1 doesn't hv air2air refueling tejas does, Fck has 6 hardpoints Tejas has 8, Fck1 range 1000 tejas 1800, fck1 weaponry limited to only American and Indigenous, while Tejas can mount Indian,russian & Israeli weapons. All while Tejas maintaining a smaller profile than fck1 in size. Both aircrafts aren't made considering same requirements and therefore different. Its easy to badmouth anything, Now your criticism of tejas probably stems frm its low production rate, IAF already has 30 tejas operational with 10 more will be delivered nxt yr. Plus IAF last yr gave an order for 83 Mk1A versions whose delivery will start frm 2024 onwards. Nations around the globe still uses 4-4.5 gen aircraft in majority& will continue till at least 2 decades, till then Tejas will never be a lost cause, it will continue serving.
I'm surprised you not only introduce the international environment background at the time and you dig deep into the the political side of this indigenous development fighter program. Very impressively in depth research. Thank you as always.
What a beautiful aircraft! Based on the design of F-CK-1 alone, it's like F-16 and F/A-18 have a child! Unfortunately,due to political reasons,this aircraft is never exported to other countries. You're probably right. Against newest PLAAF's fighters such as J-20 and J-10,F-CK-1 probably don't stand a chance in a dogfight. But,as support aircraft, especially in air to ground/surface missions,I think this aircraft still can perform formidably and effectively. 👍🏼
Its based on an F16 but with a bifurcated inlet and two engines. Strangely as soon as Taiwan completed development the US sold them F-16 fighters. I thing the IDF is used mostly as a trainer and in patrol rolls now.
Taiwan is buying more F-16V, and also upgrading old F-16 to F-16V standard. We're also developing new fighter jet with two F414 and stealth features, however I think we should take the latter with a grain of salt.
@@Thect if Taiwan can do that they will be only the third country in the world to have indigenous stealth aircraft. I don’t count Russia because there stealth aircraft suck and they have less than 10 and can’t build more.
This thing even as a second line fighter can still be used as an excellent anti cruise missile platform or do some air defence in conjunction with HAWK systems, which Taiwan has plenty, besides that, it is still a good enough strike platform with reasonable stand off reach...
True. For China to put boots on the ground, many ships and transport aircraft will be used. The F-CK-1 will take these out easily as long as weapon supplies last and there are places to land/takeoff from. A modern version of the F-5, is obvious from the front.
Most of the HAWK system TW have were retired and replaced by the indigenous sky bow 3 system because the spare part of HAWK became increasingly harder to get and the storage are running out / failing the reliability became unbearable
@@chrisdt2297 sky bow is much better but I'm not sure if it also has the electrooptical back up target accusation the later hawks had... those last batch hawks were still dangerous even after a sead mission taken their radars out...
Like the new advanced trainer aircraft (T-BE5A Yongying) of the Taiwan Air Force this time, it is not because the Italian M362 and the South Korean T-50 Golden Eagle are inferior to the T-BE5A Yongying, but because of cost and political considerations. It can reduce research and development costs, logistical burden, and revitalize Taiwan's aviation manufacturing industry, which is already on the verge of decline, because one thing must be clearly understood, whether it is F-16 or Mirage 2000, their initial design requirements are to meet the needs of the air force of the manufacturing country , After they came to Taiwan, they needed more time to adjust.
@@darkdragon2018 Taiwan is the main territory of ROC, so Taiwan can be roughly equal to ROC, unless you're one of the 140K people living in Kinmen and Matsu.
@@rick0809 No. Their constitution claims ownership to all of China... plus all of Mongolia and parts of Russia, and specifically states Taiwan is a province in China. It specifically states that inciting independence of any province in China, including the Taiwan province, any province in mainland China, or Mongolia which it states is a province of China, is an act of sedition, and offender is to be summarily executed by firing squad. To change or amend their constitution requires agreement of other provinces in the Republic of China, which means all of mainland China and Mongolia. Go read the constitution.
@@georgedang449 If you really think the China mainland is STILL a part of ROC because of the unreasonable constitution, that means COVID-19 broke out from Wuhan, the territory of ROC, ROC government should take response of this tragedy, right? Isn't Wuhan the territory of ROC? But what's the fact? The fact is the China mainland is the territory of PRC, and the constitution of PRC also says Taiwan is the territory of PRC, does that mean Taiwan is a part of PRC?
Very in-depth analysis of this interesting aircraft. It was interesting to note that it is 1.5 times more expensive to maintain than the F16 (?). However, no explanation was given. The Swedish Gripen is cheaper to operate than the F16, so I found that analogy intriguing. Yes, more power to Taiwan. It simply has to increase its military budget, but avoid big ticket defense items, and concentrate on asymmetric warfare. Long live freedom-loving countries like Taiwan and Ukraine!
The last time I checked, the world hasn't been turned into a nuclear playground and the national currency hasn't been converted into bottlecaps So no, I guess there hasn't been any china-taiwan dogfights yet
@@boomboomboom9297 Taiwan is a country, Dumbass!! But do not have any record of a Chinese-Taiwanese dogfight involving the F-CK-1.......From Hong Kong......
It was supposed to be single engine like F-16, in fact planned to used the same engine. But the design were consider too good by US so they refused to export the engine forcing a change of design.
Do you mind to make another video on the Taiwanese HF series anti-ship cruise missile? I think that is another masterpiece of Taiwanese aerospace engineering industry.
I highly suspect that american engineers helped them to design it. From what I read, we would sell them arms but what we did do is sell them the engines via civilian models and instructed them how to add an after burner to it. We couldn't sell them radar guided missiles and radar but likely helped them design their own. That's what i suspect
The IDF design was under the control of the US government, its internal fuel tank was not big enough to fly over to the mainland. Its engine is from the US. US waited for it to became successful then agreed to sell F-16. The US wanted to see everybody's abilities and stop them before surpassing the US. It is trying to do the same to China but China won't listen.
I suppose its no coincidence it closely resembles the F5E/F Tiger II. We can only hope the Taiwanese continue to manufacture cutting edge fighter aircraft at least under license however because export controls could be imposed again by the western countries it depends on.
During its development, many aeroframes were consideried, including large delta wing that could workout with less powerful engines, but the airforce and AIDC had experience of operating and overhauling/building parts for F-5s , similar shape was selected for less technical risks.
One point you did not make clear in your video. Are the T5 Yǒngyīng Supersonic Advanced Jet Trainers going to be conversions of existing FC1Ks or are they going to be new build airframes?
Intrestingly the AIDC T-5 Brave Eagle is largely based on the FC-1K Air Defense Fighter, with plans to develop an attack version called AT-5, which could be developed a sucessor to the FC-1K below the capability of the F-16V
the tc-2a and air-launched hf-2 had been canceled during the prototype phase because of the sold approval of agm-84 and agm-88, so they are never in servoce. and also t-5 use a no ab version of f-125, called f-124, so its not going to supersonic
As an American, I am fine with the use of the metric system for size but can you please, in future videos, add the pounds of thrust for the engines (I know, we're weird)? I have no idea what the conversion is from Kn (outside of looking it up). Thanks...☺
During my study in the US, i am always bother why you guys never change to the metric system?? Almost all of them in the earth use the metric system..........
@@yukin1990 we were on our way to doing so, then Reagan made an executive order in the early 80s abolishing our conversion process to metric. they took down all the dual signage. smh.
2:31 during Reagan era, arms sales to ROC (Taiwan) got even stricter, F-20 Tigers Shark and even the downgraded F-16/J79 sales to ROC (Taiwan) was never approve by the Reagan administration. ROC (Taiwan) did got the chance to purchased 40~60 2nd hand F-21 Kfir to replace the aging F-104G before the F-CK-1 go into service, but this sales fell short to over pricing.
The official name of the Taiwanese Army academy is called the Chinese Military Academy. Most Taiwanese high ranking officers are 2nd generation mainlander who don’t see themselves as Taiwanese and they despise pro-independence Taiwanese activists and the Taiwanese language( a Chinese dialect from Fujian province by the way). Back in the 60s, they would get pissed when foreigners called their country Taiwan.
I wish the Philippines had acquired this back in the 1990’s instead of the failed F/A-18 bid. Would’ve been more possible to still acquiring it for being cheaper and most closely aligned with a South East Asian country during the Asian Financial Crisis. But Alas Philippines still figuring out till now to get the F-16V or Gripen.
@H L The problem is that, the country will need fighters than "rescue equipment" as they're probably the only country with no dedicated Multirole Fighter jet as they only have 12 FA-50s, which are smaller than the F-16s. Also, they'll require 3 Squadrons of it as the Philippines' Fighter Wing is somewhat being left out among its South East Asian neighbors in the fighter department, especially that the tensions with its major adversary might come closer than we think, so it's best to gear them up with the best military assets if they're to counter the threat being posed by China and other potential adversaries.
@H L The threat of insurgents will eventually decrease. Also, the armed forces are shifting their efforts in strengthening their defense posture against external threats now as the nation is now in dire need of dedicated main assets for the defense of the nation, which include tanks, fighter aircrafts and utility aircrafts, missile defense systems, surveillance radars, and more warships.
@H L Maybe there's no active external threat at the moment, but it's best for the Armed Forces of the Philippines to be prepared in advance in case of such scenarios, especially that China will pose a serious threat to the nation. Eventually, China will possibly attack, especially how great of a threat they can pose. Whether you like it or not, China is a great threat for the Philippine Armed Forces and to its allies. It's better to prepare than letting ourselves have lots of equipment not meant for countering enemy external forces, as they'll need necessary weapons to act as deterrence against the Chinese forces
@H L China didn't own the South China Sea, for it is very far from the indicated Exclusive Economic Zone. China had also committed multiple violations. Also, the Philippines and the ASEAN Nations have more rights than China. So you better clear your mind
@H L China doesn't have any historical proof for it. As for the 9 Dash Line of China, it's almost as if they merely draw it and claims it as "historical proof" even though China is faking it. The proof that the Philippines had a claim is by an old Spanish era map, which has the Philippines in its domain, which is the great proof which wins the Philippines on its Arbitration Case against China. Also, the issue of the Falklands is a different case, compared to the issue, compared to the South China Sea/ West Philippine Sea issue. So, it's too bad that you're being misinformed by the fake Chinese news.
If I am correct they have very good anti Air defance system ( basically American patriot copy paste with almost same anti Air missile) plus 70 f16 block 70
@@justsomerandomweeb9323 You are be right, and this depends on the task. I just searched on Wiki and B1B's Max range is 12000km (I guess without any weapon load), and 9400Km with 37k lb weapon load, while its combat range is around 5500km. My comment was incorrect. At the same time, Ching-Kuo shouldn't have 5500Km range for sure. 1200Km might be a better number.
the F-CK-1 Ching-Kuo (Block III) multi role air dominance fighter should be ROCAF's first line of defense in aerial interception . . . followed by simultaneous retaliatory action by long range SAM . . . both land based & naval guided missile air defense frigates & corvettes . . .
Some elder Taiwanese said that US government relaxed restrictions on selling F-16 and Mirage2000 is a conspiracy from US government. Because ROC government reduced output of IDF and bought F-16,Mirage 2000. The most important of all is ROC government cut expenses for developing more aircrafts for ROCAF, and many staffs left for South Korea . I heard ROC want to team up with South Korea to make fifth-generation jet fighter for ROCAF but I am not sure it’s real or not.
I was working on f-ck-1 based fighter jet(vf-17) 3d model for my fictional war scenarios of my crappy fictional countries. I finished the rear sections.
Taiwan need submarines and rotational expeditionary air force with joint training with the Philippines and U.S. Have units outside the country for a secondary counter strike missions anticipating invasion from the PLA.
Anyway, the new AIDC T-5, accurately shown in this video as basically an improved F-CK-1 variant, is supposed to basically replace the aging F-5 fleet. Compared to the F-5, the new T-5 is an improvement. However, it's still an old school 4th gen design and if you look at it next to the newer and far more numerous Chinese fighter jets ... it looks pretty hopeless, doesn't it? But I think the war in Ukraine is forcing a reassessment of priorities. Advanced SAM systems and long range surface-to-surface weapon systems may be more important for Taiwan's defense, rather than trying to compete toe-to-toe with Chinese aviation in the skies. In those areas, Taiwan seems to have good systems.
I'm pleasantly surprised to hear my name "Kuo" pronounced correctly. For so many years, I gave up on trying to explain the "kwah" pronunciation. I just tell people "quo" as in "status quo". My father's Taiwanese, but very much hates the KMT, obviously including the F-CK-1's namesake Chiang Ching-Kuo. I remember back before the democratic revolution, for some reason we got a shiny brochure in the mail with color pictures of the F-CK-1 jet fighter. I just thought it was a cool looking jet fighter, but my dad looked at it like ... well he didn't literally spit on it, but I could tell that's how he felt.
This aircraft looks like the underdog that can prove to be the top gun in a close-quarters knife fight with even the mighty F15 screaming eagle which might just be left screaming obscenities when the FCK1 makes it realize that it's just FCked lmao who chose the name for this fighter anyways I just love it!
Thank you so much. 中华民国！！！！！！！！！Republic of China Taiwan, Have no idea about the size of F-CK-1? F-CK-1 Empty weight: 6,486 kg (14,299 lb) Gross weight: 9,072 kg (20,000 lb) Max takeoff weight: 12,247 kg (27,000 lb) F-5E Tiger II Empty weight: 9,583 lb (4,347 kg) Gross weight: 15,745 lb (7,142 kg) clean Max takeoff weight: 24,675 lb (11,192 kg) JF-17 Block 3 Empty weight: 7,965 kg (17,560 lb) Max takeoff weight: 13,500 kg (29,762 lb)
Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective videos
ruclips.net/p/PLEMWqyRZP_LrdqB-XbqY2LocUVEaG_w7D
Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective-Air videos
ruclips.net/p/PLEMWqyRZP_LrGyENf3nqsYKC9ZkWH414k
🇬🇧🇹🇼🇦🇺🇯🇵 the Alliance of the isles!
F-CK-1? That's the greatest designation for a fighter jet, I've seen.
I like the F-CK-1t variant
Probably means "a big middle finger to CCP China"
Chinese pilot : Just splashed 1 f-ck-er 😂
coolest name ever
Yeah fuck it baby
I can't stop but be intrigued by the fact that Taiwan created its indigenous fighter aircraft in the time when no country even considered their existence.... kudos AIDC 🇹🇼👏🥰
This was developed back in the 80's, when Taiwan was still considered one of the 4 Dragons of Asia. Those days are long gone.
@@adamc2378 Taiwan is still an Asian Dragon.
Currently, AIDC and Chungshan Tech Institute are working on a new design called "Advanced Defense Fighter" which reportedly based on F35 and F/A-18E/F Super Hornet.
@@minhtri649 Taiwan is part of china
@H L Don't worry, ROC is not going to declare Taiwan independence and PRC is not going to invade Taiwan.
Fun fact : This plane was developed at about the same time as the HAL Tejas. Yet, the destiny of these two planes were drastically different.
130 copies in 5 years what production is this ? Now upgrades to model C.
@@yutkijsamnong3202 Not only that, AIDC and Chungshan Tech Institute are working on follow up project called "Advanced Defense Fighter" which reportedly based on F35 and F/A-18 E/F Super Hornet.
@H L That's why they are making a replacement. It's the cycle. But Tejas on the other hand, is a lost cause.
@@ReviveHF 123 Tejas on order and 30 already delivered..I don't call it a lost cause..Plus it's next version Tejas Mk2(rollout next yr) will replace mirages, mig 29s and jaguars of IAF..
@@ReviveHF Except for the timeline both Aircrafts are made for different roles and under differing circumstances. While Tejas was developed as an indigenous light fighter to replace the existing Mig 21, F Ck1 was formed as a result of China-US closeness & agreements to limit the sales of military hardware to Taiwan. Otherwise Taiwan has always been a traditional American Weapon buyer which was again evidently seen when they later brought the F16, Some of those orders ever given recently. They definitely did impressive production line with more than 130+ planes, i don't deny that, but its also true that they never had any option other than that either, If you read their history you'll find that after the limited series production, the initial order which was supposed to be given was 256, but that was dropped to present 130 as then taiwan was able to strike a deal for 150 Block 20 F16 from US. Whereas India never had that crisis even in 1980s India operated Mirages and later Mig 29s.
Then we hv the aircraft technology itself the first model of F Ck 1 used American AN/APG 67 radar which is a much inferior radar compared to ELM 2032 radars of Tejas mk1 & Tejas Mk1a will hv Aesa radar. Fck1 doesn't hv air2air refueling tejas does, Fck has 6 hardpoints Tejas has 8, Fck1 range 1000 tejas 1800, fck1 weaponry limited to only American and Indigenous, while Tejas can mount Indian,russian & Israeli weapons. All while Tejas maintaining a smaller profile than fck1 in size. Both aircrafts aren't made considering same requirements and therefore different. Its easy to badmouth anything, Now your criticism of tejas probably stems frm its low production rate, IAF already has 30 tejas operational with 10 more will be delivered nxt yr. Plus IAF last yr gave an order for 83 Mk1A versions whose delivery will start frm 2024 onwards. Nations around the globe still uses 4-4.5 gen aircraft in majority& will continue till at least 2 decades, till then Tejas will never be a lost cause, it will continue serving.
I'm surprised you not only introduce the international environment background at the time and you dig deep into the the political side of this indigenous development fighter program. Very impressively in depth research. Thank you as always.
I have just bought a 1;48 model kit and I must say , the shapes in this plane are beautiful !
Who makes it?
says on the box ZHENGDEFU . Made in China mine is second hand@@brothergrimaldus3836 Sorry only just found your post !
What a beautiful aircraft! Based on the design of F-CK-1 alone, it's like F-16 and F/A-18 have a child! Unfortunately,due to political reasons,this aircraft is never exported to other countries. You're probably right. Against newest PLAAF's fighters such as J-20 and J-10,F-CK-1 probably don't stand a chance in a dogfight. But,as support aircraft, especially in air to ground/surface missions,I think this aircraft still can perform formidably and effectively. 👍🏼
I'd say it's closer to the Hornet's cousin lol, both are descendants of the F-5
Based on what happened in Ukraine, we should be more skeptical about the real technology capability of countries like Russia and China.
Its based on an F16 but with a bifurcated inlet and two engines. Strangely as soon as Taiwan completed development the US sold them F-16 fighters. I thing the IDF is used mostly as a trainer and in patrol rolls now.
Taiwan is buying more F-16V, and also upgrading old F-16 to F-16V standard. We're also developing new fighter jet with two F414 and stealth features, however I think we should take the latter with a grain of salt.
@@Thect if Taiwan can do that they will be only the third country in the world to have indigenous stealth aircraft. I don’t count Russia because there stealth aircraft suck and they have less than 10 and can’t build more.
Me reading the thumbnail as Fuck 1 Ching Kung 😳😳😳
Same lol!!
Same😂
I’m like, did they not notice?
Wouldn't have clicked on the video otherwise.
Even worse, "chinko" is Japanese kid's slang for D-CK.
Great video! I love seeing Taiwan's take on a jet fighter, very nice looking design.
This thing even as a second line fighter can still be used as an excellent anti cruise missile platform or do some air defence in conjunction with HAWK systems, which Taiwan has plenty, besides that, it is still a good enough strike platform with reasonable stand off reach...
True. For China to put boots on the ground, many ships and transport aircraft will be used. The F-CK-1 will take these out easily as long as weapon supplies last and there are places to land/takeoff from. A modern version of the F-5, is obvious from the front.
Most of the HAWK system TW have were retired and replaced by the indigenous sky bow 3 system
because the spare part of HAWK became increasingly harder to get and the storage are running out / failing
the reliability became unbearable
@@chrisdt2297 sky bow is much better but I'm not sure if it also has the electrooptical back up target accusation the later hawks had... those last batch hawks were still dangerous even after a sead mission taken their radars out...
Like the new advanced trainer aircraft (T-BE5A Yongying) of the Taiwan Air Force this time, it is not because the Italian M362 and the South Korean T-50 Golden Eagle are inferior to the T-BE5A Yongying, but because of cost and political considerations. It can reduce research and development costs, logistical burden, and revitalize Taiwan's aviation manufacturing industry, which is already on the verge of decline, because one thing must be clearly understood, whether it is F-16 or Mirage 2000, their initial design requirements are to meet the needs of the air force of the manufacturing country , After they came to Taiwan, they needed more time to adjust.
It's so... vertically compact. If it has a quick-detatch tail fin, you could potentially stack them in a carrier.
The IDF was seriously impressive at the time it was developed considering the context
it looked like it had some dna of the F20 Tigershark the F-5E and the F16 as well.
Even though its an Indigenous Aircraft
*God bless Taiwan and the Taiwanese People.*
Actually, you should call it Republic of China, cuz our country is formed by the constitution of Republic of China.
@@darkdragon2018 Taiwan is the main territory of ROC, so Taiwan can be roughly equal to ROC, unless you're one of the 140K people living in Kinmen and Matsu.
@@rick0809 No. Their constitution claims ownership to all of China... plus all of Mongolia and parts of Russia, and specifically states Taiwan is a province in China. It specifically states that inciting independence of any province in China, including the Taiwan province, any province in mainland China, or Mongolia which it states is a province of China, is an act of sedition, and offender is to be summarily executed by firing squad. To change or amend their constitution requires agreement of other provinces in the Republic of China, which means all of mainland China and Mongolia. Go read the constitution.
@@georgedang449 I am talking about fact, not talking about constitution, the fact is the fact, fxxk the constitution!
@@georgedang449 If you really think the China mainland is STILL a part of ROC because of the unreasonable constitution, that means COVID-19 broke out from Wuhan, the territory of ROC, ROC government should take response of this tragedy, right? Isn't Wuhan the territory of ROC?
But what's the fact? The fact is the China mainland is the territory of PRC, and the constitution of PRC also says Taiwan is the territory of PRC, does that mean Taiwan is a part of PRC?
Very in-depth analysis of this interesting aircraft. It was interesting to note that it is 1.5 times more expensive to maintain than the F16 (?). However, no explanation was given. The Swedish Gripen is cheaper to operate than the F16, so I found that analogy intriguing. Yes, more power to Taiwan. It simply has to increase its military budget, but avoid big ticket defense items, and concentrate on asymmetric warfare. Long live freedom-loving countries like Taiwan and Ukraine!
2 engines are all the explanation needed for increased maintenance costs
1,5 more expensive does not seem to be correct.
Makes sense to spend that much if you can't buy the F-16 or any other aircraft on par with it.
Because of smaller number to spread overhead cost.
when the enemy detects the aircraft: The FUCK !?
Another top video. Is there any record of a Chinese-Taiwanese dogfight involving the F-CK-1?
Taiwan is not a country, so nope. Unless you mean the republic of China vs the people’s republic of China, in that case, nope.
The last time I checked, the world hasn't been turned into a nuclear playground and the national currency hasn't been converted into bottlecaps
So no, I guess there hasn't been any china-taiwan dogfights yet
@@boomboomboom9297 Taiwan is a country, Dumbass!! But do not have any record of a Chinese-Taiwanese dogfight involving the F-CK-1.......From Hong Kong......
@@boomboomboom9297 台灣名稱是世界區分中共國的稱呼！
It was supposed to be single engine like F-16, in fact planned to used the same engine. But the design were consider too good by US so they refused to export the engine forcing a change of design.
This one should been call F/A 16 fighting hornet 😂😂😂😂
This would make a great DCS mod, along with all the unique weapons
To be honest it's a good looking bird.
I think it looks really good
Do you mind to make another video on the Taiwanese HF series anti-ship cruise missile?
I think that is another masterpiece of Taiwanese aerospace engineering industry.
Thanks for your ineterest. We added the Hsiung Feng series to our list. We will make a video as soon as possible.
I highly suspect that american engineers helped them to design it. From what I read, we would sell them arms but what we did do is sell them the engines via civilian models and instructed them how to add an after burner to it. We couldn't sell them radar guided missiles and radar but likely helped them design their own. That's what i suspect
Stand with Taiwan!
Long live Taiwan!!!
The IDF design was under the control of the US government, its internal fuel tank was not big enough to fly over to the mainland. Its engine is from the US. US waited for it to became successful then agreed to sell F-16. The US wanted to see everybody's abilities and stop them before surpassing the US. It is trying to do the same to China but China won't listen.
Beautiful aircraft.I can't help but think that the name of the aircraft means in a not- so-subtle-way; Flipping the bird
Looks very Northrup. Interested in details of technology transfer.
J-20的推力像老牛拉車！隱形也是吹的！哈哈！山寨國製造！
I suppose its no coincidence it closely resembles the F5E/F Tiger II. We can only hope the Taiwanese continue to manufacture cutting edge fighter aircraft at least under license however because export controls could be imposed again by the western countries it depends on.
During its development, many aeroframes were consideried, including large delta wing that could workout with less powerful engines, but the airforce and AIDC had experience of operating and overhauling/building parts for F-5s , similar shape was selected for less technical risks.
Looks like a mix between a F-16 and a F-5
多謝你的介紹，我是台灣人。
你的報導符合事實。
請容許我再補充一點，台灣的工程師在完成F-C-K-1所有的製造之後，由於台灣購買了F-16，這使得F-C-K-1工程師失去繼續製造新型戰鬥機的經費，導致許多優秀的工程師大量失業，許多工程師後來受聘於韓國政府，為他們設計與製造了新的教練機T-50。 台灣人對於政府不能留下人才而怨恨台灣政府。
i am a Taiwanese.. this F .. CK-1 is really an intriguing name 😊
One point you did not make clear in your video.
Are the T5 Yǒngyīng Supersonic Advanced Jet Trainers going to be conversions of existing FC1Ks or are they going to be new build airframes?
An Army spokesperson told us that it has the aerodynamic exterior of the F-CK-1, but is completely different internally from the original fighter
Intrestingly the AIDC T-5 Brave Eagle is largely based on the FC-1K Air Defense Fighter, with plans to develop an attack version called AT-5, which could be developed a sucessor to the FC-1K below the capability of the F-16V
the tc-2a and air-launched hf-2 had been canceled during the prototype phase because of the sold approval of agm-84 and agm-88, so they are never in servoce. and also t-5 use a no ab version of f-125, called f-124, so its not going to supersonic
Oh, ok.
As an American, I am fine with the use of the metric system for size but can you please, in future videos, add the pounds of thrust for the engines (I know, we're weird)? I have no idea what the conversion is from Kn (outside of looking it up). Thanks...☺
KN = 980 kg and equal 980 x 2.2 pound.
During my study in the US, i am always bother why you guys never change to the metric system?? Almost all of them in the earth use the metric system..........
@@yukin1990 we were on our way to doing so, then Reagan made an executive order in the early 80s abolishing our conversion process to metric. they took down all the dual signage. smh.
@@molochi well....why...
@@yukin1990 Why? Probably something ideologically linked to thinking that the 1950s represented "best 'Murica."
2:31 during Reagan era, arms sales to ROC (Taiwan) got even stricter, F-20 Tigers Shark and even the downgraded F-16/J79 sales to ROC (Taiwan) was never approve by the Reagan administration. ROC (Taiwan) did got the chance to purchased 40~60 2nd hand F-21 Kfir to replace the aging F-104G before the F-CK-1 go into service, but this sales fell short to over pricing.
Am I the only one who finds the name of it really… interesting?
The official name of the Taiwanese Army academy is called the Chinese Military Academy. Most Taiwanese high ranking officers are 2nd generation mainlander who don’t see themselves as Taiwanese and they despise pro-independence Taiwanese activists and the Taiwanese language( a Chinese dialect from Fujian province by the way). Back in the 60s, they would get pissed when foreigners called their country Taiwan.
Send All These Cheenas Back to China
I wish the Philippines had acquired this back in the 1990’s instead of the failed F/A-18 bid. Would’ve been more possible to still acquiring it for being cheaper and most closely aligned with a South East Asian country during the Asian Financial Crisis. But Alas Philippines still figuring out till now to get the F-16V or Gripen.
@H L The problem is that, the country will need fighters than "rescue equipment" as they're probably the only country with no dedicated Multirole Fighter jet as they only have 12 FA-50s, which are smaller than the F-16s. Also, they'll require 3 Squadrons of it as the Philippines' Fighter Wing is somewhat being left out among its South East Asian neighbors in the fighter department, especially that the tensions with its major adversary might come closer than we think, so it's best to gear them up with the best military assets if they're to counter the threat being posed by China and other potential adversaries.
@H L The threat of insurgents will eventually decrease. Also, the armed forces are shifting their efforts in strengthening their defense posture against external threats now as the nation is now in dire need of dedicated main assets for the defense of the nation, which include tanks, fighter aircrafts and utility aircrafts, missile defense systems, surveillance radars, and more warships.
@H L Maybe there's no active external threat at the moment, but it's best for the Armed Forces of the Philippines to be prepared in advance in case of such scenarios, especially that China will pose a serious threat to the nation. Eventually, China will possibly attack, especially how great of a threat they can pose. Whether you like it or not, China is a great threat for the Philippine Armed Forces and to its allies. It's better to prepare than letting ourselves have lots of equipment not meant for countering enemy external forces, as they'll need necessary weapons to act as deterrence against the Chinese forces
@H L China didn't own the South China Sea, for it is very far from the indicated Exclusive Economic Zone. China had also committed multiple violations. Also, the Philippines and the ASEAN Nations have more rights than China. So you better clear your mind
@H L China doesn't have any historical proof for it. As for the 9 Dash Line of China, it's almost as if they merely draw it and claims it as "historical proof" even though China is faking it. The proof that the Philippines had a claim is by an old Spanish era map, which has the Philippines in its domain, which is the great proof which wins the Philippines on its Arbitration Case against China. Also, the issue of the Falklands is a different case, compared to the issue, compared to the South China Sea/ West Philippine Sea issue. So, it's too bad that you're being misinformed by the fake Chinese news.
If I am correct they have very good anti Air defance system ( basically American patriot copy paste with almost same anti Air missile) plus 70 f16 block 70
@H L你家習犬知道你在這謊話連篇嗎？哈哈
The range is incorrect in the video -- 10:57 5,500km? This range is twice as much as the B1B bomber.
B-1B has a max range of 12,000km tho
@@justsomerandomweeb9323 You are be right, and this depends on the task. I just searched on Wiki and B1B's Max range is 12000km (I guess without any weapon load), and 9400Km with 37k lb weapon load, while its combat range is around 5500km. My comment was incorrect. At the same time, Ching-Kuo shouldn't have 5500Km range for sure. 1200Km might be a better number.
I F-CKING LOVE the F-CK-1! F-CK IT!
the F-CK-1 Ching-Kuo (Block III) multi role air dominance fighter should be ROCAF's first line of defense in aerial interception . . . followed by simultaneous retaliatory action by long range SAM . . . both land based & naval guided missile air defense frigates & corvettes . . .
Looks like a Hornet and a Falcon had a baby.
Thank you for pointing out that war between the US and China will be NUCLEAR. The best scenario is keep the status quo and avoid war.
They can start develop a new type MRCA to replace this F-CK-1. Probably under designation F-CK-2.
Some elder Taiwanese said that US government relaxed restrictions on selling F-16 and Mirage2000 is a conspiracy from US government. Because ROC government reduced output of IDF and bought F-16,Mirage 2000. The most important of all is ROC government cut expenses for developing more aircrafts for ROCAF, and many staffs left for South Korea .
I heard ROC want to team up with South Korea to make fifth-generation jet fighter for ROCAF but I am not sure it’s real or not.
rellay
@@shengchelin6462 I am a Taiwanese so I am sure about that.
The Philippines Air Force should buy these.
Malaysian Air Force should buy this as well because F-5E is so good.
I will fly it, in my future life.
I was working on f-ck-1 based fighter jet(vf-17) 3d model for my fictional war scenarios of my crappy fictional countries. I finished the rear sections.
I always think it looks close to a twin engined F16... 🙈
Please do a video on Gotland-class submarine
Why they don't named it FCK - U just to troll Mainland.
That is what I thought too. Instead of C's and D's, they should have just named them F-CK - U for the upgraded version.
@@brianjoy2009 nonono is F-CK-2
Taiwan need submarines and rotational expeditionary air force with joint training with the Philippines and U.S.
Have units outside the country for a secondary counter strike missions anticipating invasion from the PLA.
@H L 法理與事實不同，如果你了解近代中國政權變更的歷史
@H L 你說的我承認,世界大部分承認PRC取代ROC,但也如你所說ROC還在台灣，所以事實是兩岸各治互不隸屬。
@H L 發動內戰的是誰啊?不就是那個在抗日對戰時，扯國民黨的黃俄支那嗎?抗戰打完，黃俄支那就開始搞革命，哈哈，只會偷換概念，共慘黨的標準套路。
@H L 那你們就趕緊打過來，到底是誰的政權會先被打破，還不知道ㄟ，加速清零吧。
@H L 哈哈，你家毛主席都承認自己是靠日本人的幫助才起來的，還感謝日本欸，我是不知道哪來的臉，說國民黨發動內戰。
Anyway, the new AIDC T-5, accurately shown in this video as basically an improved F-CK-1 variant, is supposed to basically replace the aging F-5 fleet. Compared to the F-5, the new T-5 is an improvement. However, it's still an old school 4th gen design and if you look at it next to the newer and far more numerous Chinese fighter jets ... it looks pretty hopeless, doesn't it?
But I think the war in Ukraine is forcing a reassessment of priorities. Advanced SAM systems and long range surface-to-surface weapon systems may be more important for Taiwan's defense, rather than trying to compete toe-to-toe with Chinese aviation in the skies. In those areas, Taiwan seems to have good systems.
are you willing to die in the future war with mainland if taiwan declares independent?
Make a video about embraer/aermacchi AMX and Embraer Super Tucano, please
Her is our Tucano video. We hope you wii enjoy it
ruclips.net/video/0eDNXOAo5J0/видео.html
Bruh the engines need to be replaced with something more powerful than 42kn
From view during air show it must be more than 42KN.
For 12tons aircraft it is more than enough
Can’t wait for the f-ck u 2 version
It's like the F5, F16 and F18 parts were dropped on the factory floor and were kit-bashed together :) very uncanny :)
Looks like an F5 and an F18 had a baby
Also I can't be the only one that just calls it "fuck 1"
Unlike Chinese planes, the F-CK-1 is a very reliable plane according to its service record in the past three decades!
Good look aircraft
the air intake makes me see the rafale...😮
Taiwan’s FCK1s are light years ahead of any airplanes from China. ❤
Looks like a hybrid of the F-16 and F-18
f18 body with f 16 cockpit wings and tail
The aircraft looks as if the f18 and f16 had a child together
You are right.when the 1988.l am high school student.first see is combined F16 and F18 and smaller.
A reasonable hedge against a potential arms Embargo.
I'm pleasantly surprised to hear my name "Kuo" pronounced correctly. For so many years, I gave up on trying to explain the "kwah" pronunciation. I just tell people "quo" as in "status quo".
My father's Taiwanese, but very much hates the KMT, obviously including the F-CK-1's namesake Chiang Ching-Kuo. I remember back before the democratic revolution, for some reason we got a shiny brochure in the mail with color pictures of the F-CK-1 jet fighter. I just thought it was a cool looking jet fighter, but my dad looked at it like ... well he didn't literally spit on it, but I could tell that's how he felt.
why did he hate the KMT?
Fill in the blanks: F_CK 🤣
looks like this Aircraft was heavley influenced by F-16!
As Taiwanese, we not often use F-CK-1 to call it, we use IDF instead, and it also has funny nick name call " I Don't Fly", got it ?😂
When F-18 have a baby with F-16
Thanks!
Thanks for your support
A cross between an F-16 & F-18
F-5 and F-16 has a child...
F-16 and jf-17 combination or look alike
Love it's capabilities
Hate it's name
In fact in Taiwan we all use IDF (Indigenous Defense Fighter) to call it.
F-CK-1 only appears in the file.
This is such a great aircraft has rafel's air intakes f18's wings 😅
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩
I misread the title as F@CKING Kuo.
F-CK Yeah!
😂 I can’t stop laughing at the name of fighter😂
I am actually reading the hillarious comments.
This Taiwan fighter designation is almost like “F**K” - 1. What a name???? Come in F**K 1. Roger, Roger this is F**K 1.
Is that an F16 under license?
No
This aircraft looks like the underdog that can prove to be the top gun in a close-quarters knife fight with even the mighty F15 screaming eagle which might just be left screaming obscenities when the FCK1 makes it realize that it's just FCked lmao who chose the name for this fighter anyways I just love it!
nice fighter aircraft but couldn't they gave it a better designation. It's just one letter away from a "french" swear word.
Twin engine, prettier, F-16
Its an F5-E but in steroids...
Isn't this just an F5
FCk-1應研改為AI 無人機 向美國租購F15 F18
6 months ago
are they running out of creativity to name their planes? AAM F-CK-u2 ASM F-CK-u3
Thank you so much. 中华民国！！！！！！！！！Republic of China Taiwan,
Have no idea about the size of F-CK-1?
F-CK-1
Empty weight: 6,486 kg (14,299 lb)
Gross weight: 9,072 kg (20,000 lb)
Max takeoff weight: 12,247 kg (27,000 lb)
F-5E Tiger II
Empty weight: 9,583 lb (4,347 kg)
Gross weight: 15,745 lb (7,142 kg) clean
Max takeoff weight: 24,675 lb (11,192 kg)
JF-17 Block 3
Empty weight: 7,965 kg (17,560 lb)
Max takeoff weight: 13,500 kg (29,762 lb)
中華民國臺灣
fixed for you
欣慰
Why they name it 🦆 1?
The background music is so distracting to your commentary it's difficult to understand you
Should have invested on making cars. They would have achieved more.
Taiwan nowadays make scooters and outdated mini vans.