JH-7 (Flounder) | The ship hunter of China

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 217

  • @WeaponDetective
    @WeaponDetective  Год назад +6

    Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective videos
    ruclips.net/p/PLEMWqyRZP_LrdqB-XbqY2LocUVEaG_w7D
    Please click the link to watch our other Chinese Systems videos
    ruclips.net/p/PLEMWqyRZP_LoJXFBUYN75biwfUhMq1osE
    Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective-Air videos
    ruclips.net/p/PLEMWqyRZP_LrGyENf3nqsYKC9ZkWH414k

    • @suntemple3121
      @suntemple3121 Год назад

      ⭐🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳

    • @fredtedstedman
      @fredtedstedman Год назад

      can't help but think "Jaguar - on steroids " from some angles , landing gear , intakes ?? she's a beauty 😍😍

  • @saynotowars
    @saynotowars Год назад +111

    Unlike other videos involving China, this is an objective, clear, and concise information of china without baseless accusations and biases. Good job, buddy !!

    • @grigor.h3929
      @grigor.h3929 5 месяцев назад +2

      Well , this plane killed 42 test pilots and 60+ navy pilots, has been called “widow maker”.

    • @ZigaZagu
      @ZigaZagu Месяц назад

      @@grigor.h3929 wait seriously

  • @weifan9533
    @weifan9533 Год назад +46

    Very well analyzed, with no exaggerations and no belittling, which is rare for any topic related to China.

  • @AO-ow6tt
    @AO-ow6tt Год назад +44

    This is one of the best looking aircraft of China's Airforce which look a little bit similar to the Jaguar Sepecat of the UK but is bigger in size.

  • @kalik8354
    @kalik8354 Год назад +41

    A correction at 13:00: The horton ho229 is unrelated to the B-2. The reason the B-2 looks the way it does is the XB-35, YB-35, YB-49. There were even earlier flying wing type planes from other countries. Jack Northrop(of the B-2's Northrop-Grumman) was working on the flying wing in the 30's I think.

    • @Abdullah-mn6sw
      @Abdullah-mn6sw Год назад +23

      That was there whole point

    • @kevinstrade2752
      @kevinstrade2752 Год назад +2

      Engineers from NG studied the Go-229 when designing the B2. No its not a development of the Go-229 but designers got some influence from it.

  • @Suhardi-oi4mc
    @Suhardi-oi4mc Год назад +11

    The best Chinese support from 🇮🇩🇲🇨

  • @craig4867
    @craig4867 Год назад +34

    Never underestimate your enemy! One of the first things I learned as a fighter pilot, because it can be costly and deadly!

  • @therover65
    @therover65 Год назад +14

    I lived in Shanghai from 2002 to 2014. On the rare few occasions where I saw combat aircraft’s flying, I believe it was this plane. In little Singapore where I’m from, you hear or see combat aircraft, military transport, helicopters etc flying everyday.

    • @joeblack888
      @joeblack888 9 месяцев назад

      the reason is that the land size of China is bigger than of Singapore.

  • @jimsaintamour2
    @jimsaintamour2 Год назад +8

    Wow! This was an awesomely in-depth video of (too me) a little know airplane. Thank you so much! I’m now subscribed

  • @bobkids009
    @bobkids009 Год назад +15

    Slowly but steady the Chinese Air Force is getting its momentums of becoming an advance Air Strikers team to defend its sovereigns territories and the country at large...... JH-7 is undoubtedly an examples of such advance machine.......... Well done.....!

    • @whybndsu
      @whybndsu Год назад

      The South China Sea is NOT Chinese sovereign territory. Never was, never will

    • @bradenhagen7977
      @bradenhagen7977 Год назад

      "Defend"

  • @eduardoromero5629
    @eduardoromero5629 Год назад +15

    I think it's a beautiful aircraft

  • @michaelfrench3396
    @michaelfrench3396 Год назад +12

    And after listening through the end of the video, I advise you to look up the Northrop YB49, the piston-powered YB35 and 36, and Jack Northrop himself. Jack Northrop was the first man that had a functioning flying wing. He was kind of a nut for them. He in fact, flew his first operational prototype in 1940. The B2 Spirit has far more in common with those two aircraft. Then it does with the German bomber. It was Northrop after all that developed and produced the B2.

    • @cosmoray9750
      @cosmoray9750 Год назад

      8 former Navy officers imprisoned by Qatar accused of spying on emirate’s super-secret submarine programme.
      Allegedly spying for Israel arrested in Qatar

    • @ronjon7942
      @ronjon7942 Год назад +1

      That’s kinda the point he was making.

  • @ľőŵďǒpė86
    @ľőŵďǒpė86 Год назад +7

    i’m American but i must say that this is a very nice looking airframe

  • @WildBillCox13
    @WildBillCox13 Год назад +15

    That stock footage of USN B66 bombers testing their tail guns is priceless Americana. Nice touch.

    • @BengalLancer
      @BengalLancer Год назад +9

      You mean this one 01:38 …??
      This particular one is not b66 by the way.

    • @IohannesCR
      @IohannesCR Год назад +10

      That’s a Harbin H-5/Il-28

    • @SolomonSamson747
      @SolomonSamson747 Год назад +1

      Beagles, bruh

    • @SolomonSamson747
      @SolomonSamson747 Год назад

      Also the USN flew the A3D. The USAF flew the B-66

  • @ヒロシ-s7z
    @ヒロシ-s7z Год назад +8

    For pick up 🇯🇵 's Mitsubishi F1&F2,
    I 'm happy :)
    As you say,
    I thought it was close to how it works.

  • @flickingbollocks5542
    @flickingbollocks5542 Год назад +13

    It's not so much about the range of the planes anymore, it's the range their missiles and their radar capability to pick up the enemy.

    • @recoil53
      @recoil53 Год назад +1

      You have to go out to get the targets in the missile's range.

    • @flickingbollocks5542
      @flickingbollocks5542 Год назад +1

      @@recoil53
      Missiles have longer and longer ranges.

    • @recoil53
      @recoil53 Год назад +1

      @@flickingbollocks5542 Yes, but so do the missiles on ships. The point is to take out the ships before they can strike the mainland.

    • @ex0duzz
      @ex0duzz Год назад +1

      China has even longer land and sea based anti ship and carrier killer missiles with 5000km+ ranges.

  • @flickingbollocks5542
    @flickingbollocks5542 Год назад +13

    Please show us some more footage of the Cold War jets, especially the Soviet and Chinese planes.
    Thanks.
    Is that footage of those H5/Il-28 bombing and firing their rear cannons part of a longer clip?

  • @gooner72
    @gooner72 Год назад +1

    Actually fella.......... during the Falklands War in 1982, only 1 Royal Navy ship (HMS Sheffield) was sunk by Exocet, 1 Royal Navy ship (HMS Glamorgan) was damaged by Exocet and one civilian cargo ship (Atlantic Conveyor) was sunk by Exocet.

  • @Marc-.
    @Marc-. Год назад +4

    The reinforced wing design gives it capability of carrying large ammunitions on wings which the other 4th n 5th gen jets are not capable of

  • @zorankalina4399
    @zorankalina4399 Год назад +3

    Nice looking plane👌

  • @ChandranPrema123
    @ChandranPrema123 Год назад +12

    Honestly its looks like its has F14 Tomcat Nose,Tornado Body,MIG 31 Style and Jaguar type Air Inlets and that big Thicc Landing Gear.

    • @nexususer1108
      @nexususer1108 Год назад +8

      It also looks like Boeing 747, 757, 777, 787 and all the airbus jets. Because it also has wings and landing gears.

    • @Hawakura436
      @Hawakura436 Год назад +1

      are you talking about tejesh 🤣🤣🤣 crap

  • @Jon.A.Scholt
    @Jon.A.Scholt Год назад +3

    The JH-7 looks to me like a smaller version of the A-5 Vigilante more than a larger Jaguar.

    • @erice.9514
      @erice.9514 Год назад

      And thought the nose and the tail section looks like a Typhoon fighter.

    • @ronjon7942
      @ronjon7942 Год назад

      My first thought was the A-5 too.

  • @michaelfrench3396
    @michaelfrench3396 Год назад +4

    This video was good enough to get me to subscribe. 👍

  • @jameskreger3932
    @jameskreger3932 Год назад +7

    The B-2 is not a decedent of the Ho 229. Northrup flue it’s first flying with in 1942 and assumably had the idea of it a bit earlier.

  • @cocoaiscool2709
    @cocoaiscool2709 Год назад +5

    people who say it’s a copy haven’t watch the video yet

  • @ethanmac639
    @ethanmac639 Год назад +3

    will the JH-7 fly with the H-6 and J-20 and J-11 on missions?

  • @mikeycraig8970
    @mikeycraig8970 Год назад +2

    I was going to say it looks like a mash up between Jag and Tornado....

  • @habahan4257
    @habahan4257 Год назад +4

    Good video as always. I love you making systems that I don't find on other channels

  • @alex3261
    @alex3261 Год назад +5

    That looks a lot like a scaled up IAR-93 / J-22

    • @zuxbg9688
      @zuxbg9688 Год назад +1

      Coincidece, J22/IAR93 also uses R-R engine (proportionaly smaller model). But J22/IAR93 is attack, while JH7 is fighter.

  • @flickingbollocks5542
    @flickingbollocks5542 Год назад +4

    Front to back in looks:
    Tornado
    Jaguar
    Mig 23/21

  • @lwfozzy6925
    @lwfozzy6925 Год назад +4

    It looks a little like a Jaguar ,especially with the landing gear out.

  • @MultiDivebomber
    @MultiDivebomber Год назад +1

    Since WW2....aircrafts are the rulers of the sea.....they decide the naval warfare.

  • @JesseJames-kv7xc
    @JesseJames-kv7xc Год назад +3

    se parece un f4-phatom con tomas de aire del jaguar y la parte trasera de un SU-24, dios tiene todo en uno.

  • @kevindog5080
    @kevindog5080 Год назад +1

    It's actually a pretty good jet. What is designed to do merely carry cruise missiles and staying off. JH7 The stealthy one I think is probably true

  • @freeworld88888
    @freeworld88888 Год назад +2

    It is not the main Navy attacker. Jh7A has a great fighter bomber with 9000kgs weapons.

  • @lovepapa9559
    @lovepapa9559 Год назад +1

    JH7 has get influence from MIG 27 but changes to twin engines😊. Somebody said is copy from Jagour is talkative influences😅.

  • @amarjeetbadhani3616
    @amarjeetbadhani3616 Год назад +1

    Good video...

  • @MarioEsquivel
    @MarioEsquivel Год назад +2

    congratulations!, really good information!

  • @grid-panda
    @grid-panda Год назад +1

    In fact, the development history of JH-7 is very helpless. Even the final JH-7 design could not meet the PLAAF's needs - what they needed was a modernized H-5 (Chinese version of the IL-28), so they terminated funding. The technology and cost factors at the time could only meet the requirements of the sea attack aircraft, so the Navy replaced the Air Force to provide funds. Later, the PLAAF's old H-5 was unable to fly and had to invest in the development of an upgraded version of the JH-7A that could strike ground targets, and the Navy also used a variant of the JH-7A when purchasing new aircraft.

  • @watb8689
    @watb8689 Год назад +1

    this plane is meant for rough taking off runway or bombed runway. it has very short takeoff, less than 50m. It was meant to be a bomb truck

    • @ex0duzz
      @ex0duzz Год назад +1

      50 meter takeoff? No way.

    • @prashanthb6521
      @prashanthb6521 Год назад +1

      Winnie the Phoo told you 50m is enough ?

    • @kocannery3596
      @kocannery3596 Год назад

      @@prashanthb6521 modi the master stroke said so

    • @yecloud
      @yecloud Год назад

      I think you lost a 0

  • @jl3802
    @jl3802 Год назад +1

    The bgm is the song of PLAAF❤

  • @khaldrago911
    @khaldrago911 Год назад +5

    Nice video dude! Good to see y’all doing vids on what the Chinese have. It gives insight into what we’ll be dealing with soon enough.

    • @lchansocal
      @lchansocal Год назад

      I don't think you will deal with this in the future. China just don't have the time or the intention to deal with India. Her major enemy is United States and Japan.

    • @khaldrago911
      @khaldrago911 Год назад

      @@lchansocal bubba, we’ve been dealing with them for the past decade. Numerous politicians and military figures have stated that there’ll be a war over Taiwan in the next few years.

    • @peekaboopeekaboo1165
      @peekaboopeekaboo1165 11 месяцев назад

      ​@@khaldrago911
      Yup ... Your Military and politicians plus MIC are in cahoots with one another !
      Manipulating the American public into believing it's "China Threat" propaganda .
      U$ has planned to attack the Chinese nation in order to prop-up it's ally the neo-fascist DPP ...from setting up a quasi-Japanese colonial territory in Taiwan.

  • @Joshua_N-A
    @Joshua_N-A Год назад +1

    Sounds like Japan's F1, which primary mission was maritime strike.

  • @yarmud
    @yarmud Год назад +3

    i wonder if china faced an engine embargo from the west ever?

    • @deanwood1338
      @deanwood1338 Год назад +1

      Even if they did they would just hack and steal the design 😂

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota9397 Год назад +1

    Realy I like this powerful strike aircraft

  • @kevinstrade2752
    @kevinstrade2752 Год назад +1

    Its good to upgrade the JH-7 but why develope stealthy versions and spend money when China already has the J-20 and 35 under advanced development? I would just upgrade these and keep them in service along side more advanced designs that should be getting most of the development attention.

    • @zegzbrutal
      @zegzbrutal Год назад

      China stopped JH-7 development when J-16 and J-20 is in mass production.

  • @JamesLaserpimpWalsh
    @JamesLaserpimpWalsh Год назад +3

    Kind of reminds me of a tornado a bit.

    • @sebastienprivat1259
      @sebastienprivat1259 Год назад +4

      I'm thinking more of a Jaguar on steroids.

    • @habahan4257
      @habahan4257 Год назад +3

      I think it looks like the child of the Jaguar and F-4 Phantom II

  • @into_the_void
    @into_the_void 10 месяцев назад

    Its interesting to note that china does also operate strategic bombers namely the Xi'an H6

  • @Tirah5
    @Tirah5 7 месяцев назад

    China was way ahead of India and still is at least 50 years ahead of India in such technology.

  • @tinman205
    @tinman205 Год назад

    Hi, Weapons Detective where and how is it possible to get Janes Aircraft books or even pdf's...Thank You

  • @samueljenkins5456
    @samueljenkins5456 Год назад

    Keep on track with the radar absorbing materials coating but try and get the foxbat 25 and reverse engineer the engines and make those a final upgrade to your bombers squads.😅😊😎

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota9397 Год назад +1

    I like this powerful fighters jets

  • @johnasbury3261
    @johnasbury3261 Год назад +1

    I can just see the American Pilots dreaming of encounters with these they're not bad but they're not anywhere near the equal of an American plane

  • @RogerSanGabriel
    @RogerSanGabriel Год назад

    When I was in Suzhou China in 2014, I was Chinese SU-27 on a early morning.

  • @erkanylmaz5564
    @erkanylmaz5564 Год назад +2

    Thanks for video.

  • @yanchan9711
    @yanchan9711 Год назад +2

    It was definitely a mistake to give up on continuing to develop WS6 in the past.
    British products are indeed cost-effective.
    But this is a major setback for the domestic engine team
    A similar situation also happened to Shanghai Y-10

  • @chx4eva
    @chx4eva Год назад

    Army naval airforce does not sound confusing at all

  • @shilongtang549
    @shilongtang549 Год назад +1

    这个飞机就不要吹了,是中国很早之前设计的二代战机,安全问题比较多,虽然也改装过电子战机以及升级,并能携带超远程空射反舰导弹。但是军方对它的运用一直比较限制

  • @Thinkofwhat
    @Thinkofwhat Год назад +1

    Reckon you need to do more chinese related military vehicles. Quite popular compared to other topics:)

  • @misha791
    @misha791 Год назад +1

    JH-7 stationed and located in West Philippine Sea PLA Artificial Islands to strike and outflank 7th fleet and allied vessels in AO Philippine Sea Indo Pacific Region.

  • @BengalLancer
    @BengalLancer Год назад

    Army's naval Air Force.
    Anything more left?

  • @grigor.h3929
    @grigor.h3929 5 месяцев назад

    BR 6.7 Stone Age jet in top tire games.

  • @duckjoss2206
    @duckjoss2206 Год назад

    Make about golan apc

  • @leecheong4986
    @leecheong4986 Год назад

    They are going to put a YJ21 ASBM hard point onto it. This bomber has good range, 2400km and is supersonic. A thousand km out couple with a thousand km in range of the YJ21 will do the job all the way to Guam. China has plenty of them, both. Nothing is more potent than having 12 YJ21 hypersonic flying at you at the same time in a saturated attack. How many air craft carriers does the Americans have in the Pacific? It will not be safe for those American bases from South Korea to Japan to the Philippines to Guam. Australia will ‘taken care’ of through strategic bombers also equipped with YJ21.

  • @haxter3
    @haxter3 Год назад

    I think Kfir is hard copy of Mirage III of Dassault France

  • @adm7038
    @adm7038 Год назад +1

    Why would the British provide the Spey engines? It’s a strategic blunder to provide license manufacture to a potential adversary. Especially when the Chinese were so far behind on aero engine technology.

  • @niuchajianfa6222
    @niuchajianfa6222 Год назад +13

    "the first cold war" lol someone just cannot wait for the second one

    • @niuchajianfa6222
      @niuchajianfa6222 Год назад +8

      And they want to blame china for it lol

    • @devil5cry
      @devil5cry Год назад +1

      ​@@niuchajianfa6222
      but for the record
      Chi na started it

    • @niuchajianfa6222
      @niuchajianfa6222 Год назад

      @@devil5cry do you even know what cold war is? dummmmbfck

    • @jeffshen2073
      @jeffshen2073 Год назад

      @@devil5cryand will end it.

    • @HahaHaha-gq8ft
      @HahaHaha-gq8ft Год назад

      ​@@jeffshen2073 when ? 🤣🤣

  • @kumaroadking1580
    @kumaroadking1580 Год назад

    Old aircraft but effective cold war stuff

  • @KirbyZhang
    @KirbyZhang Год назад +2

    we know when western analysts look for aircraft lineage, it's as purely motivated as when their politicians look at human rights. 🤣🤣

  • @cropstar
    @cropstar Год назад

    It looks like the offspring of a Mirage F-1, Tornado, Jaguar and a little bit of Phantom!. Kinky!

    • @Terryray123
      @Terryray123 Год назад +1

      Also, a little A-5 vigilant

  • @sohrabroozbahani4700
    @sohrabroozbahani4700 Год назад +1

    command modern air and naval operations, chains of war campaign, Okinawa bound mission is where you feel the shortcomings of the JH7A, it's short legs makes it extremely hard to utilise beyond engaging the targets over Taiwan while H6s don't have the much needed SEAD capability you will need to deal with SAM packed island out there on the sea just outside your reach and protected by all the dangerous F15Js that JSDF can muster on station...

    • @peekaboopeekaboo1165
      @peekaboopeekaboo1165 11 месяцев назад

      Funny false narrative and fantasy .
      PRC won't attack Japan .
      PRC will only defend herself from missiles launch against them from/on Japanese warships/warplanes and islands in the East China Sea .

  • @misterbig9025
    @misterbig9025 Год назад +2

    Can it sink Indian aircraft carrier?

    • @georgebarnes8163
      @georgebarnes8163 Год назад

      anything can sink one of those nasty Russian clones

  • @TheArtofWarChina
    @TheArtofWarChina Год назад

    China is planning to convert all JH-7 and J7 into UAV instead of just retiring them.

  • @ahvidaneidavirgilluminous8754
    @ahvidaneidavirgilluminous8754 Год назад

    my impression, j22 orao more likely than jaguar

  • @georgecastiblanco2978
    @georgecastiblanco2978 Год назад

    Copialina del Mirage F1 francés y el sepecat jaguar franco britanico.pero de mayor tamaño remplaza en el PlA al senyang J7 y 8 no ha Sido exportado .

  • @olivierpuyou3621
    @olivierpuyou3621 Год назад +2

    👍

  • @pedrocastilhos2341
    @pedrocastilhos2341 Год назад +2

    👍👍👍

  • @corey8420
    @corey8420 Год назад +1

    Wish you would also use Imperial measurements, it's contemptuous that you don't.

    • @MarkzOng
      @MarkzOng Год назад

      FYI the whole wide world use metrics system. Only very few bigots still using imperial nowadays. Even I believe US army uses metrics system.

    • @elphmeister
      @elphmeister Год назад +1

      Metric is not that difficult to learn.

  • @MUSICSTATIONBAND
    @MUSICSTATIONBAND Год назад

    dont worry, its a flounder and it will flounder.

  • @freedomworldall
    @freedomworldall Год назад

    Modernized Mig 21. Is it so capable?

  • @lttan2867
    @lttan2867 Год назад

    It looks like everything birds except planes.

  • @foxbaturaa
    @foxbaturaa 9 месяцев назад

    amx or mig 27

  • @spencerstevens2175
    @spencerstevens2175 Год назад

    Why Flounder?
    Why Not?

  • @amrx78
    @amrx78 Год назад

    kfir is a copy of mirage huh ?

  • @有时真忍不住笑
    @有时真忍不住笑 Год назад

    The flying duck for easy hunting by battle ship fire weapons

  • @shawnkuo001
    @shawnkuo001 Год назад

    Thought China has already retired all JH7.

  • @stevennotthe2997
    @stevennotthe2997 Год назад

    they just added this to war thunder!!!

  • @Ade-mu4zn
    @Ade-mu4zn 11 месяцев назад +1

    🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩

    • @Ade-mu4zn
      @Ade-mu4zn 11 месяцев назад +1

      🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩

  • @twotrackjack2260
    @twotrackjack2260 Год назад

    From the top view looking down it looks like an f-18 from Wish 😂

  • @bondankai13
    @bondankai13 Год назад +2

    This is when the world lets china mix their aircraft designs, you get this much of an aircraft.
    I mean it's like when I doodle a mix of aircraft designs but Chinese engineers get to build their doodle design IRL XD
    Also for top its like A5 vigilante as for the rest is tornado, mirage f1 etc.

  • @Hawakura436
    @Hawakura436 Год назад

    seems like Indias tejesh mk2 already in service lol. sell to india they will buy and show them as tejesh mk2 to their public

  • @dkoz8321
    @dkoz8321 5 месяцев назад

    Chinese version of Tornado

  • @4411825
    @4411825 Год назад

    Disappointing China 🇨🇳 rejected the request of the DPRK 🇰🇵!

  • @msn6793
    @msn6793 Год назад

    Those Chinese weapons may be ultimate in technology however basic difference in chinese defence forces is non exposure of war scenarios for last more then 50 years, in other words two generations of chinese soldiers never saw or gone through actual battles. ... hence chinese armaments will be not much effective when its operating manpower is inexperienced. ..

    • @starfortunate8160
      @starfortunate8160 Год назад

      所以你认为在动物园长大没有捕猎经验的老虎就没有战斗力 可以随意拿捏了是吗🤣

  • @mikewant5230
    @mikewant5230 Год назад +1

    Hahaha! As long as China sends dozens of these fighters to Noryh Korea, whose warships do you think they will bomb down into the sea?

  • @nesay678
    @nesay678 Год назад +2

    Hey bro Turkish language please

  • @hanabangirawan3291
    @hanabangirawan3291 Год назад

    agar fhm saja , dasar kuat pengetahuan pesawat2 tmpur cina itu berawal dr soviet russia , mengenai pengembangannya ya itu kreasi cina sendri , gk ada niru2 amerika dsb. nyatanya teknologi cina diberbagai bidang sdh lewati amerika ngapain sirik trs .....

  • @hbc511
    @hbc511 Год назад

    Obsolete they need to upgrade them.

  • @satoveswuh5493
    @satoveswuh5493 Год назад

    Chinese engineers knows how to design the aircraft using different countries aircraft design

  • @stasnov
    @stasnov Год назад

    People’s Liberation Army Naval Airforce…… I giggled a little.