Quick look: cheap power-over-ethernet adapters

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 18 янв 2023
  • You may recall a couple of different power-over-ethernet adapters showed up in the December mailbags
    Time to take a quick look at them
    -----
    My tip jar: / pileofstuff
    My other tip jar (channel membership) : / @pileofstuff
    Buy me a coffee (or a beer): ko-fi.com/pileofstuff
    If you are OK with me getting a commission on your purchases, feel free to use my affiliate links:
    Ebay: ebay.to/33IF7PA
    Banggood: pileofstuff.ca/r/9ajsf
    Some other links to products may be affiliate links
    odysee.com/@pileofstuff
    #ElectronicsCreators
    -----
    This isn't the only way to do it.
    It's probably not the best way to do it.
    But it's how I did it.
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 54

  • @eDoc2020
    @eDoc2020 Год назад +2

    Those adapters clearly don't do Gigabit but passive PoE _is_ possible with Gigabit. They put a coil across the data pairs and use the center tap to impose a common-mode voltage while not affecting the differential data signal.

  • @SeanBZA
    @SeanBZA Год назад +1

    Those are common in CCTV systems, with a 48V injector module, and then the remote end having a small DC Dc converter to make 12V or 5V from it.

  • @onecircuit-as
    @onecircuit-as Год назад +5

    Interesting adapters, thank you Mr Stuff! 👍😀

    • @SidneyCritic
      @SidneyCritic Год назад +3

      Mr Stuff - lol -.

    • @Okurka.
      @Okurka. Год назад +3

      @@SidneyCritic It's better than calling him PoS.

    • @pileofstuff
      @pileofstuff  Год назад +2

      I'll answer to either. I ain't proud...

  • @RSterkenburg
    @RSterkenburg Год назад +3

    People must be confused about the 802.3 compliant PoE (802.3 af, at, bf) which absolutely works with all 4 data pairs and in parallel with Gigabit, and these passive injectors that repurpose 2 pairs for power.
    The standard for 1000 base T Gigabit Ethernet, 802.3ab, published in 1999, requires 4 pairs. We know there are ways to do it with fewer conductors - powerline adapters have only 2 - that requires extra circuitry that does not exist on any standard network card.

  • @danman32
    @danman32 Год назад +2

    The other problem with using passive PoE injectors is having the correct voltage for the powerEd device.

  • @markb4071
    @markb4071 Год назад +7

    those passive PoE 'injectors' are also bloomin' dangerous - the power is there all the time that the power is on. Meaning you can very easily fry anything you connect to them if it's not expecting a voltage that high on those pins.
    Source: Me - i'm an IT engineer and have been caught out, so only proper PoE sensing injectors/kit, passive stuff can get in the sea :)

    • @pileofstuff
      @pileofstuff  Год назад

      Yeah, the better way to go would be to use a switch with PoE ports natively installed - and it would give you full Gig-E.
      Like a lot of things in the security camera industry, these things are a bit of a bodge.

    • @Irilia_neko
      @Irilia_neko Год назад +3

      Logically this can't fry any modern device because they are supposed to be protected again that

    • @markb4071
      @markb4071 Год назад +3

      @@Irilia_neko go and try it. Plug your desktop pc / Mac into a socket fed by 24v passive PoE let me know how you get on 👍

    • @Irilia_neko
      @Irilia_neko Год назад +2

      @@markb4071 no xD

    • @jyvben1520
      @jyvben1520 Год назад +1

      @@markb4071 these are meant to be used with the original power supply for the network device,
      if you start mixing then you invite disaster !

  • @beanyrat
    @beanyrat Год назад +2

    So was just on Amazon and randomly clicked on a POE camera as I thought 'that looks cheap'. Come to YT to see if any of my subbed channels have new content and this video is right there under reconsolidations. I know you get tracked everywhere but FML 🤣 That said, interesting video. Never realised how simple these things are internally, not that i've put much thought into it tbh.

  • @pepzi_
    @pepzi_ Год назад +1

    I agree that this will never work with Gbit Ethernet. There's another standard, 1000BASE-T1 that does gigabit on a _single_ pair, for industrial and automotive use! Max distance is 15 meters though :D

  • @johnfoster3895
    @johnfoster3895 Год назад +3

    Unfortunately, you will have someone always argue that THEY can do something you cannot. They will argue simply because they do not know 'standards'. But not knowing something, they will argue with their last breath even in the face of proof.
    I enjoy your teardowns and watch them at work (I'm a 'TWIDGET' also).

  • @fredflintstone1
    @fredflintstone1 Год назад +1

    Nice explaination, 🙂

  • @RonDogInTheHouse
    @RonDogInTheHouse Год назад +1

    OCD crash! Hey, if it works, leave it alone, there's a reason it's that way.

  • @Irilia_neko
    @Irilia_neko Год назад +2

    The others were wrong, they can transfer tbsp 😸

  • @jparrish
    @jparrish Год назад +2

    Good explination for the older Poe adapter/injectors. I have to watch to make sure that I get PoE injectors that do handle 1000BaseT. Have you ever tried using a PEoC adapter? I have applications that I can't run Cat5e/6 to, but have existing Coax, so I convert the PoE to Coax with an adapter and back to PoE on the other end. (Camera Upgrades). Those can also only do 100BaseT.

    • @pileofstuff
      @pileofstuff  Год назад +1

      I haven't played with anything to do with networking on coax for a very long time.

    • @Thats_Mr_Random_Person_to_you
      @Thats_Mr_Random_Person_to_you Год назад +1

      Agree that these passive adapters are useful for use cases where 100BaseT is all thats needed. To be fair though 'full fat' 802.3af or 802.3at adapters are getting cheap enough now that for most applications, 1000BaseT is easy to have.

  • @helmuthschultes9243
    @helmuthschultes9243 Год назад +1

    Would have been useful to explain how Gigabit Ethernet does POE given the usage of all wire pairs to realise the 1GBit rate data flow.. Clearly suggests power net is sharing the wires with RF block/filter to isolate low impedance DC from signal paths.

    • @pileofstuff
      @pileofstuff  Год назад

      I'm hoping to be able to demonstrate it with hardware in the future.

    • @helmuthschultes9243
      @helmuthschultes9243 Год назад +1

      @@pileofstuff ok, that would help many who have less technical background. As you will have noted from various other comments, the standards and variances can leave many highly confused, as some info says ok, works and other says no way. Sadly it is highly dependant on many variables and hardware variances. Mis used setups can do much costly damage for people without needed knowledge/understanding.
      Good effort anyway, at least has informed many of the limitations of these very simple basic pieces of hardware , and to not expect peak performance using it. Maybe emphasis too to ensuring only safe DC voltages are used compatible with connected powered hardware. These provide NO power management or protection.

  • @8antipode9
    @8antipode9 Год назад +1

    😲Sacrificing your INTERNET speed to prove a point??? My kinda guy! 😀👍

  • @kuhrd
    @kuhrd Год назад +3

    You are correct that 1000BASE-T does not allow for gigabit over less than 4 pairs but 1000BASE-TX or TIA/EIA 854 is gigabit over 2 pairs of shielded twisted pair cat6 or cat7. It was done in some commercial environments but you won't likely find the capability on standard consumer hardware.
    This was very common in 2007 installs and later but it fell out of use when 10GB became common in business. Now 40GB and 100GB are commonplace in datacenters and commercial applications with 10GB becoming very common for modern office drops. Where I work they installed drops that split out a single shielded cat 6 cable into 2 separate keystones because they wanted a separate gigabit connection for the phone system and one for the computer. That was about 12 years ago. So each office desk only has one drop with 2 keystones that both provide gigabit using 1000BASE-TX over a single 4 pair cable. This is not a widely used standard but it does exist. Cat6, Cat7 and even Cat8 are much cheaper now so it is less common to see people installing 2-pair systems. 1000BASE-TX also sometimes requires you to set it in your network driver settings since it doesn't autonegotiate on all hardware that supports it since it is a physical layer standard.
    My home network switch is 10G on all ports and it will even do some autonegotiation based on what is available on the other side and the frequency capability of the cable being used. So if the cable is crap you might only see 1GB or 2.5GB or 5GB rather than 10GB link speed even if the hardware on both ends supports the 10GB speed just because the cable cannot support the needed frequency for such high data rates.

  • @Mr.Unacceptable
    @Mr.Unacceptable Год назад +1

    Have you seen the video card addons for laptops? they are so cheap but do they work? It's to put a video card on a laptop to [lay games on an external monitor. the are only the cables and the PCB. If they work you could make a cool enclosure.
    Another thing on ebay is the kits that convert a 'smart' TV to a basic monitor. Is it worth it try one if the backlight still works? I have 2 50 inch 1080 TV's I'd like to fix. both back lights work but power supplies are dead. Do any support 1080 or are they lying and they are 720 or 480? could you convert a 4K to a 1080 TV this way? They don't have 4k control boards that I could see.

  • @Palmit_
    @Palmit_ Год назад +1

    i was interested in the the little boxes but you only tested the 4 wire cables. what happen when cat full wired 6 cable is plugged in to box thing?

    • @pileofstuff
      @pileofstuff  Год назад +1

      Exactly the same result with the cables or the boxes.

    • @Palmit_
      @Palmit_ Год назад +1

      @@pileofstuff oh ok. thanks for replying. i was just curious is all :)

  • @LoudLino
    @LoudLino Год назад +1

    How can i find/buy a mat like on your work surface? TIA

    • @pileofstuff
      @pileofstuff  Год назад +1

      I got this one at Princess Auto.
      You can often find them at craft stores, like Micheals.

    • @LoudLino
      @LoudLino Год назад

      @@pileofstuff thanks much, there’s a Michael’s near me,,awesome, keep up your useful videos 👏

  • @dom1310df
    @dom1310df Год назад +1

    What happens if you force ubuntu to try 1Gbps over only 2 pairs, rather than let it auto-negotiate a speed? I imagine it defaults to only 100Mbps because it only detects two pairs, but that doesn't mean 1Gbps won't work

    • @pileofstuff
      @pileofstuff  Год назад

      If the hardware can't support it, the software isn't able to force the issue.

    • @eDoc2020
      @eDoc2020 Год назад +1

      If you force a standard NIC to operate at 1Gbps you won't get any connection.

  • @user.A9
    @user.A9 Год назад +1

    My network cubby is worse.

  • @markusallport1276
    @markusallport1276 Год назад +2

    As many times as I have heard someone try to convince me 1g is possible, I will now offer this video as evidence. Thank you Kent.

    • @pileofstuff
      @pileofstuff  Год назад +1

      My goal is to end more arguments than I start!

    • @Okurka.
      @Okurka. Год назад

      Even 10G is possible. Thanks to a thing called phantom power you can have power and data on the same wire.

  • @uksuperrascal
    @uksuperrascal Год назад

    SEE YOUR ODYSEE CHANNEL

    • @pileofstuff
      @pileofstuff  Год назад +1

      I don't understand what that guy is trying to do with my videos, but I'm suspicious.

    • @uksuperrascal
      @uksuperrascal Год назад

      @@pileofstuff Hi Glad i got your attention did you watch my Super-Grand-Ad odysee video yet ?

    • @pileofstuff
      @pileofstuff  Год назад +1

      @@uksuperrascal Not sure why you are calling me out? Or scraping my video data?
      Please don't try to use me (or my audience) to try and advertise your videos.

    • @uksuperrascal
      @uksuperrascal Год назад +1

      ​@@pileofstuff Why on earth do you think I am calling you out Or scraping your video data? - When in fact I am praising your Channel and video data by saying it needs to be saved to a simple txt database, for all for free to share, thinking it is only common courtesy to let you you know that your channel featured in my video. So I am not trying to use you or your audience Or trying and advertise my videos. In fact, I am advertising your channel and your videos for free for all my 5k + internet followers to may be to Subscribe to you in my video.

    • @pileofstuff
      @pileofstuff  Год назад +1

      @@uksuperrascal The amount of effort you seem to have put into contacting me made me suspicious. As you might imagine, I get quite a lot of spam/scam messages.
      I apologize if you aren't one of those.