Numbers is not key to victory - Quran 9 :25 Correct belief is - Quran 2 : 137! Narrated Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman: The people used to ask Allah's Messenger (ﷺ peace and blessings be upon him) about the good but I used to ask about evil lest I should be overtaken by it. So I said, "O Allah's Messenger (ﷺ peace and blessings be upon him)! We were living in ignorance and in an (extremely) worst atmosphere, then Allah brought to us this good (Islam); will there be any evil after this good?" He said, "Yes." (Mutzailah? - Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings on him said best generation is the first 3, avg. age is 60 - 70 year. 11h. + 70 x 3 = 220h. when the Mutazila Mihna took place, Imam ibn Hanbal lived through is why Ibn Kathir states his mathhab is strongest with the Sunna...) I said, 'Will there be any good after that evil?" He replied, "Yes, but it will be tainted'' I asked, "What will be its taint?" He replied, "Some will guide others not according to my tradition? You will approve of some of their deeds and disapprove of others." (Asharis? - as Imam Ashari raised mutazila and as he aged became more Athari but his old views still spread mixing truth & falsehood - they had 3 cycles, Suljuks to cross - aids aided by shi'a, Ayubids to Monguls aided by shi'a & Uthmanis to europe aided by shi'as...) I asked, "Will there be any evil after that good?" He replied, "Yes, some people calling at the gates of the Fire, and whoever will respond to their call, will be thrown by them into the (Hell) Fire." I said, "O Allah s Apostle! Will you describe them to us?" He said, "They will be from our own people and will speak our language." (Ikwanis? - a response to the fallen Ashari sufi Uthmanis with the same bida that fell them & more when Ibn Adbul Wahab's dawa could of saved them, ikwanis mix sufism, shi'aism and masonry - as Sh. Albani said they treated the illness with illness) I said, "What do you order me to do if such a state should take place in my life?" He said, "Stick to the group of Muslims and their Imam (ruler)." I said, "If there is neither a group of Muslims nor an Imam (ruler)?" He said, "Then turn away from all those sects even if you were to bite (eat) the roots of a tree till death overtakes you while you are in that state." - Sahih al-Bukhari 7084, Afflictions and the End of the World ... Enter Banu Tamim, name of the tribe of Ibn Abdul Wahab, the in laws of Aal Saud... (Hadith on Banu Tamim is the hardest on dajjal and there will be a group on truth until the descent of Jesus in end times...)
@@Mohammedibrahim853 Amin, wa iyakum, video was beast with facts & refutation. I just wish AbdurRahman would quote the ahlul bida with writing references so we can line it up with the haqq and commentary for full clear refutation. Best video since I saw Abu Uwais biography on ibn Taymiyya for his Aqida Wasitiya tapes.
We don't need kalam, or its greek baggage, we have Qiyas Islam for logic. We don't need Sufi batini baggage, we've Sunni Zhud & Dawa for tazkiya! Ashari talk on Allah's Siffat wrong divides, shirk in Quran 7 :32, opens sufi misuse hadith dream prophecy to grave worship to colonies, Tawhid ties to safety in Nur 55.
1:16 No he isn't qobory or anything You just want to make a bad image of the sheikh What's your proof of that claim?? Did you have a proof that he prayd to qabr or make any thing of this!? It is just a lie you always say it when you want to attack someone and make him in a bad image
He was a misguided quboori jahmi who called the Shia his brothers and called for unity with them. Rather they are disbelievers and mushrikoon. Hassan Al Bannah said: Know that Ahl us-Sunnah and the Shiah are Muslims, the kalima "There is none worthy of worship except Allaah and Muhammad is the Messenger of Allaah" unites them. And this is the foundation of the aqidah. And the Sunnah and the Shiah are the same (regarding that), and (they) are upon purity. As for the difference between them both, then it is in matters in which it is possible to bring them together. -Dhikriyyaat, Laa Mudhakkaraat" (1st print, Dar al-I'tisaam, 1985), pp. 249-250
@@ibmsulaymani Asalam Aleikum bro, the clip in pin comment has Juwaini saying Aql over Naql, can you collect Ashari imams saying this quoting their books like you did on their deviation on saying there are 2 Qurans or their view on Iman! If you can incl. isnad from Baqilani to Ghazali, It would be a KO!
@@ibmsulaymani Kindly consider making this video and perhaps making a playlist with similar videos I mentioned, what do you think bro? I know you are likely busy but if you can take the time to give me some feedback I would appreciate it! Allahuma Barik!
@@Gufaaco You put to define philosophy as a "guiding principle"! Philosophy is man made observations, but Quran & Sunna is above it as Allah is all knowing & our true guide. As for using their language, its like using bible, secondary to show internal weakness but we don't take what opposes Islam!
@@Gufaaco We don't need kalam, or its greek baggage, we have Qiyas Islam for logic. We don't need Sufi batini baggage, we've Sunni Zhud & Dawa for tazkiya! Ashari Kalam bida on Allah's Siffat divides, shirk in Quran 7:32, opens dream prophecy sufi misuse, grave worship & colonies. Tawhid ties to safety in Nur 55.
Do these Asharis, maturities (modern-day Barelvis & Deobandis) believe that Allah is mixed with the creation?? and do they share this belief with the Shia meaning do Shias have the same belief ??? Nauzubillah, I want to understand this ya akhi
Yes, they adopt the neo-platonic metaphysical argument of Ibn Arabic (The ZIndiq), called wadhat ul-wajood (Unity of Existence), it is very similar to the Buddhist concept of nirvana.
Nauazubillah doesn't this go against the fitrah, I was watching a Shia so-called scholar talking about Allah yesterday he said the same thing that Deobandis say, may Allah protect us from their fitnah
Some of the points are very weak. The brother is just mentioning scholars and their books...and those books don't even address Aqeedah per se. Even the comment about Ikhwani is completely false because I have met and discussed certain things with those people. So I find this to be over exaggerated. It's easy to just quote people and their books and say they are from a certain school when it comes to Aqeedah. He mentioned he "read hadith books"...based on whose authority or Isnaad? In order to understand hadith or even have authority in the books of Hadith you must attain Ijazah in it to even talk about it. You must read it to a scholar of Hadith to understand and receive traditional knowledge. You can't just be a reader on your own and claim you know it all now. That's why Shaikh Albani (ra), whom I love and is respect was critiqued. His critiques of hadith was critiqued. No one is perfect. Every scholar has their errors. But we take the good and leave the bad.
It's important to learn from certified scholars. Even of you line yourself with Saudi Ulema that's fine. Learn from scholars such as Shaikh Munajjid and others. But don't take your ilm from RUclips. Go sit with a certified scholar of Deen. And look to his character and focus on priorities.
@@elzika739 there are my friend. You'll have to seek them. For example Shaikh Hatem el Hajj or Shaikh Idrees Maneesee from Minnesota. We have scholars all around who studied from scholars around the world. They might no be RUclips famous but we have scholars.
If I choose today to sit down with Muslims and deal with the apostasy rate.. and say let’s not talk about aqeedah let’s deal with this issue at hand first.. does that discredit every good that I may bring to the ummah .. even if I teach the basics of fiqh ??
@Ahmad Hanbal how can u compare yaqeen institute and ikhwaanul Muslimeen.. do you know what ur talking about? Do you know who the Muslim brotherhood even are ?? Do you know that major scholars applauded them for there work prior to when they became enemies of Saudi .. salahudin al ayubi done the exact same thing but by the sword ..ikhwanis use intellect .. are u declaring salahudin an innovator for uniting all Muslims (including ahlul bidda) to fight the kafirs
@Ahmad Hanbal ofcourse that’s why I said give me evidence from the salaf(sahaba,tabi3een ect; .. don’t bring me evidence from rabee3 ( so called salafi) ..if you understood basic English u would understand my question .. so bring the evidence if not stay quiet
@Ahmad Hanbal u said Muslims“ uniting to fight the bigger enemy” the same way Sallahudin al ayubi did is against what the salaf said.. u said the salaf warned against that .. show me the evidence .. and take note that I said MUSLIMS that does not include sects that fall out of the fold of Islam ie; Shia
@@mocro4life5713 Average Muhammad shams Eldin Enjoyer:)) You believe that Allah set down on the the throne as your imams so it's not a surprise to say that!!
@@ZainEl3abdeeen let me give you a list of scholars who believe allah sit on his kursi/arsh or graded the hadith sahih imam waki ibn jarrah, sufyan thawri , imam ahmed , abdullah ibn ahmed they graded the hadith sahih , abdullah ibn ahmed the son of imam has an whole chapter regarding the sitting of allah tabaraka wa ta'ala , imam ad darimi in his rad ala marisi has writtin about this , harb al kirmani in his masail has written about this , al khallal in his as sunnah has writin about this , kharijah ibn mus'ab said can istiwa be anything but sitting ? , there are multiple hadiths where the prophet says that allah will sit on his kursi , there are multiple hadiths and big scholars confirm this ( including for example abdul qadir al jillani ) that the prophet pbuh will sit with allah on his arsh
@@mocro4life5713the Hadith you are mentioning are fabricated and Imam Shafi’i made Takfir on those who believe Allah sits on the Arsh. He writes: ❝Whoever believes that Allāh is seated on the Throne, then he is a kāfir.❞ Narrated by Ibnul-Muʿallim Al-Quras͟hiyy in his book Najmul-Muhtadiy, p. 51.
@@mocro4life5713the Hadith you mention are fabricated as are many of the books you are using to claim Imam Ahmad and his son (may Allah be pleased with them both) believed that. On the contrary, Scholars of the Salaf like Imam Shafi’i made Takfir on those who believe Allah sits upon the Arsh. Imam Shafi’i said: ❝Whoever believes that Allāh is seated on the Throne, then he is a kāfir.❞ Narrated by Ibnul-Muʿallim Al-Quras͟hiyy in his book Najmul-Muhtadiy, p. 51.
![NoCap - Maliboo [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FUV7E0QyniU/mqdefault.jpg)
Part 1 - ruclips.net/video/IGeotCEfMr4/видео.html
Part 2 - ruclips.net/video/cqQgBhsGFRs/видео.html
Numbers is not key to victory - Quran 9 :25 Correct belief is - Quran 2 : 137!
Narrated Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman:
The people used to ask Allah's Messenger (ﷺ peace and blessings be upon him) about the good but I used to ask about evil lest I should be overtaken by it. So I said, "O Allah's Messenger (ﷺ peace and blessings be upon him)! We were living in ignorance and in an (extremely) worst atmosphere, then Allah brought to us this good (Islam); will there be any evil after this good?" He said, "Yes."
(Mutzailah? - Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings on him said best generation is the first 3, avg. age is 60 - 70 year. 11h. + 70 x 3 = 220h. when the Mutazila Mihna took place, Imam ibn Hanbal lived through is why Ibn Kathir states his mathhab is strongest with the Sunna...)
I said, 'Will there be any good after that evil?" He replied, "Yes, but it will be tainted'' I asked, "What will be its taint?" He replied, "Some will guide others not according to my tradition? You will approve of some of their deeds and disapprove of others."
(Asharis? - as Imam Ashari raised mutazila and as he aged became more Athari but his old views still spread mixing truth & falsehood - they had 3 cycles, Suljuks to cross - aids aided by shi'a, Ayubids to Monguls aided by shi'a & Uthmanis to europe aided by shi'as...)
I asked, "Will there be any evil after that good?" He replied, "Yes, some people calling at the gates of the Fire, and whoever will respond to their call, will be thrown by them into the (Hell) Fire." I said, "O Allah s Apostle! Will you describe them to us?" He said, "They will be from our own people and will speak our language."
(Ikwanis? - a response to the fallen Ashari sufi Uthmanis with the same bida that fell them & more when Ibn Adbul Wahab's dawa could of saved them, ikwanis mix sufism, shi'aism and masonry - as Sh. Albani said they treated the illness with illness)
I said, "What do you order me to do if such a state should take place in my life?" He said, "Stick to the group of Muslims and their Imam (ruler)." I said, "If there is neither a group of Muslims nor an Imam (ruler)?" He said, "Then turn away from all those sects even if you were to bite (eat) the roots of a tree till death overtakes you while you are in that state."
- Sahih al-Bukhari 7084, Afflictions and the End of the World
...
Enter Banu Tamim, name of the tribe of Ibn Abdul Wahab, the in laws of Aal Saud... (Hadith on Banu Tamim is the hardest on dajjal and there will be a group on truth until the descent of Jesus in end times...)
Wow how did I miss this talk. Jazakallahu khairan for the link Really interesting Allhamdulliah.
@@Mohammedibrahim853 Amin, wa iyakum, video was beast with facts & refutation. I just wish AbdurRahman would quote the ahlul bida with writing references so we can line it up with the haqq and commentary for full clear refutation. Best video since I saw Abu Uwais biography on ibn Taymiyya for his Aqida Wasitiya tapes.
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 We must properly equip our self with knowledge to invite them to the correct methodology.
@@MuhammadAli-mz4pq May Allah bless our efforts to be sincere to be among the heaviest on the scales and effective and swift and widespread!
MAY ALLAH REWARD YOU WITH GOODNESS.
Taqi Usmani also does ta'weel in ayatul Kursi and 7:54 in his tafseer available in SoundCloud
JazakALLAH khair
We don't need kalam, or its greek baggage, we have Qiyas Islam for logic.
We don't need Sufi batini baggage, we've Sunni Zhud & Dawa for tazkiya!
Ashari talk on Allah's Siffat wrong divides, shirk in Quran 7 :32, opens sufi misuse hadith dream prophecy to grave worship to colonies, Tawhid ties to safety in Nur 55.
Barak Allahu Feekum 🥰
Assalamu aleikum Ibrahim, do you know where is the recitation of the Ustadh from?
I think it’s surah Yusuf but I’m not sure about the video also sorry.
Sheikh Ali Tantawi returned to the correct Aqeedah. You should correct that brother, AbdulRahman. Jazaka Allahu Khairan
1:16
No he isn't qobory or anything
You just want to make a bad image of the sheikh
What's your proof of that claim??
Did you have a proof that he prayd to qabr or make any thing of this!?
It is just a lie you always say it when you want to attack someone and make him in a bad image
He was a misguided quboori jahmi who called the Shia his brothers and called for unity with them. Rather they are disbelievers and mushrikoon.
Hassan Al Bannah said:
Know that Ahl us-Sunnah and the Shiah are Muslims, the kalima "There is none worthy of worship except Allaah and Muhammad is the Messenger of Allaah" unites them. And this is the foundation of the aqidah. And the Sunnah and the Shiah are the same (regarding that), and (they) are upon purity. As for the difference between them both, then it is in matters in which it is possible to bring them together.
-Dhikriyyaat, Laa Mudhakkaraat"
(1st print, Dar al-I'tisaam, 1985), pp. 249-250
@@AbuInayaAl-Athari-po3yj what's is your country?
Asalaamualaikum brother
Can you please explain for the likes of me
Using philosophy to justify Islam is wrong?
ruclips.net/video/bKve_P-ggtc/видео.html
@@ibmsulaymani Asalam Aleikum bro, the clip in pin comment has Juwaini saying Aql over Naql, can you collect Ashari imams saying this quoting their books like you did on their deviation on saying there are 2 Qurans or their view on Iman! If you can incl. isnad from Baqilani to Ghazali, It would be a KO!
@@ibmsulaymani Kindly consider making this video and perhaps making a playlist with similar videos I mentioned, what do you think bro?
I know you are likely busy but if you can take the time to give me some feedback I would appreciate it! Allahuma Barik!
@@Gufaaco You put to define philosophy as a "guiding principle"!
Philosophy is man made observations, but Quran & Sunna is above it as Allah is all knowing & our true guide. As for using their language, its like using bible, secondary to show internal weakness but we don't take what opposes Islam!
@@Gufaaco We don't need kalam, or its greek baggage, we have Qiyas Islam for logic.
We don't need Sufi batini baggage, we've Sunni Zhud & Dawa for tazkiya!
Ashari Kalam bida on Allah's Siffat divides, shirk in Quran 7:32, opens dream prophecy sufi misuse, grave worship & colonies. Tawhid ties to safety in Nur 55.
Do these Asharis, maturities (modern-day Barelvis & Deobandis) believe that Allah is mixed with the creation?? and do they share this belief with the Shia meaning do Shias have the same belief ??? Nauzubillah, I want to understand this ya akhi
Yes, they adopt the neo-platonic metaphysical argument of Ibn Arabic (The ZIndiq), called wadhat ul-wajood (Unity of Existence), it is very similar to the Buddhist concept of nirvana.
As for the Shia, the Twelvers, they believe their imams control the atoms of the universe.
I recommend you to read the book "The reality of Ibn Arabi" by Ali Hassan khan.
Nauazubillah doesn't this go against the fitrah, I was watching a Shia so-called scholar talking about Allah yesterday he said the same thing that Deobandis say, may Allah protect us from their fitnah
@@MuhammadAli-mz4pq I will surely read this one InshaAllah, Shukran akhi ❤
How old is Ustafh abdur rahman hassan
33
3:15 isn't ali tantawi athari?
انظر ما قال الشيخ مقبل عن علي الطنطاوي
Some of the points are very weak. The brother is just mentioning scholars and their books...and those books don't even address Aqeedah per se. Even the comment about Ikhwani is completely false because I have met and discussed certain things with those people. So I find this to be over exaggerated. It's easy to just quote people and their books and say they are from a certain school when it comes to Aqeedah. He mentioned he "read hadith books"...based on whose authority or Isnaad? In order to understand hadith or even have authority in the books of Hadith you must attain Ijazah in it to even talk about it. You must read it to a scholar of Hadith to understand and receive traditional knowledge. You can't just be a reader on your own and claim you know it all now. That's why Shaikh Albani (ra), whom I love and is respect was critiqued. His critiques of hadith was critiqued. No one is perfect. Every scholar has their errors. But we take the good and leave the bad.
False
The Asha'ira belief is clearly influenced by Greek logic and philosophy. Let it go bro.
It's important to learn from certified scholars. Even of you line yourself with Saudi Ulema that's fine. Learn from scholars such as Shaikh Munajjid and others. But don't take your ilm from RUclips. Go sit with a certified scholar of Deen. And look to his character and focus on priorities.
Find a certified scholar where when there aren’t any in the western world ...
@@elzika739 there are my friend. You'll have to seek them. For example Shaikh Hatem el Hajj or Shaikh Idrees Maneesee from Minnesota. We have scholars all around who studied from scholars around the world. They might no be RUclips famous but we have scholars.
al-Munajjid has been warned by Abdul Aziz al-Rayyis. Is hatem al-haj authentic? These are not scholars.
If I choose today to sit down with Muslims and deal with the apostasy rate.. and say let’s not talk about aqeedah let’s deal with this issue at hand first.. does that discredit every good that I may bring to the ummah .. even if I teach the basics of fiqh ??
@Ahmad Hanbal how can u compare yaqeen institute and ikhwaanul Muslimeen.. do you know what ur talking about? Do you know who the Muslim brotherhood even are ?? Do you know that major scholars applauded them for there work prior to when they became enemies of Saudi .. salahudin al ayubi done the exact same thing but by the sword ..ikhwanis use intellect .. are u declaring salahudin an innovator for uniting all Muslims (including ahlul bidda) to fight the kafirs
@Ahmad Hanbal also if your going to respond at least answer the question
@Ahmad Hanbal which salaf pls show me evidence .. evidence from the salaf not from “salafis”
@Ahmad Hanbal ofcourse that’s why I said give me evidence from the salaf(sahaba,tabi3een ect; .. don’t bring me evidence from rabee3 ( so called salafi) ..if you understood basic English u would understand my question .. so bring the evidence if not stay quiet
@Ahmad Hanbal u said Muslims“ uniting to fight the bigger enemy” the same way Sallahudin al ayubi did is against what the salaf said.. u said the salaf warned against that .. show me the evidence .. and take note that I said MUSLIMS that does not include sects that fall out of the fold of Islam ie; Shia
Ashaaria is ahl alsunna weljamaa
They belong to ahlul jahmiyyah wal jammah
@@mocro4life5713 Average Muhammad shams Eldin Enjoyer:))
You believe that Allah set down on the the throne as your imams so it's not a surprise to say that!!
@@ZainEl3abdeeen let me give you a list of scholars who believe allah sit on his kursi/arsh or graded the hadith sahih imam waki ibn jarrah, sufyan thawri , imam ahmed , abdullah ibn ahmed they graded the hadith sahih , abdullah ibn ahmed the son of imam has an whole chapter regarding the sitting of allah tabaraka wa ta'ala , imam ad darimi in his rad ala marisi has writtin about this , harb al kirmani in his masail has written about this , al khallal in his as sunnah has writin about this , kharijah ibn mus'ab said can istiwa be anything but sitting ? , there are multiple hadiths where the prophet says that allah will sit on his kursi , there are multiple hadiths and big scholars confirm this ( including for example abdul qadir al jillani ) that the prophet pbuh will sit with allah on his arsh
@@mocro4life5713the Hadith you are mentioning are fabricated and Imam Shafi’i made Takfir on those who believe Allah sits on the Arsh.
He writes:
❝Whoever believes that Allāh is seated on the Throne, then he is a kāfir.❞
Narrated by Ibnul-Muʿallim Al-Quras͟hiyy in his book Najmul-Muhtadiy, p. 51.
@@mocro4life5713the Hadith you mention are fabricated as are many of the books you are using to claim Imam Ahmad and his son (may Allah be pleased with them both) believed that.
On the contrary, Scholars of the Salaf like Imam Shafi’i made Takfir on those who believe Allah sits upon the Arsh.
Imam Shafi’i said:
❝Whoever believes that Allāh is seated on the Throne, then he is a kāfir.❞
Narrated by Ibnul-Muʿallim Al-Quras͟hiyy in his book Najmul-Muhtadiy, p. 51.