I’m a hobbiest. I’ve used this application twice. Both times I got back a 3D model near 85-90% of what I wanted. It’s not perfect, but it’s going to save me a lot of time and frustration in creating the models I want for a project. Again, this is my hobby. I don’t get paid to do it and my modeling skills can’t hold a candle to the things I’ve seen. This gets me off to a running start on what I want to do. I think it’s incredible!
I would bet that part is probably not the AI... AI probably generates a very detailed triangular mesh, it gets remeshed with something similar to the add-on Quad Remesher, and the detail gets proyected on the retopo...
@@TopChannel1on1 Not at all. Senior character artist here working in AAA. Spends all my day modeling and when we implement tools that allow us to reuse stuff or use already made assets, it's just more time for us to model even more stuff. These tools of 3d model generation are pretty basic models using some sort of texture projection and auto remesher. Nothing close to industry needs or quality standards. One day, sure.
3d modeller for a fashion company. I can say that ai and photogrammetry it still not good enough for us to use. With AI we have the problem of uploading unpublished designs. With Photogrammetry we have the problem of interpreting glossy and transparent objects. Im modelling shoes and bags every day and for the stuff we’re doing, unless they decide they can no longer afford 3d modelers to keep their standards up, we are safe.
3D Artists aren't going away. You can generate great starting models, but the RODIN ai creates models that aren't as nice as the drawings it gets which means that a human artist then needs to go in and add details and redo certain areas that got clapped together. Because AI isn't able to think or even respond to basic requests, it therefore can't do these details.
Hello. Can AI replace us in the near future? If algorithms for easy retopo and UV unwrapping are developed with AI, I don’t think this will hinder me. But if a prompter can produce a professional mesh in 3 seconds, does easy retopo and UV unwrapping have any meaning? No matter how much we optimize our art in terms of time, does our imagination have any significance compared to easily and effortlessly creating a 3D mesh with a prompter? In such a case, can I still be an artist?
its impossible to tell the future but i think artists will just adapt like we have done before, AI hype is already slowing down, which means less investment which slows down Ai research, but again its impossible to predict
Rodins amazing but the uvs seem all screwed up when u unwrap them in blender, is there a way to fix them or do we have to make new materials? just curious, am totally new to all this im just learning blender because of finding out about rodin
So if i have an alien forest picture and i want to use similar alien plants but different scenery, how can i do that? Basically im trying to get multiple images of an alien planet that has the same theme
0:57 the tech looks good. but your observational skills. The model is not exact. AI calculated the ornamentation on that chair to look like a ball sack. Funny, but not accurate.
There are plenty of reasons to want to skip certain parts of modelling. Infuriating retopology, making mistakes and having to redo a piece... Sure. I think that's what this addon should've been about, clipping out retopology because *no one* likes it. But to just create a model off the cusp of a few clicks, which will come later in the future, from 0 to done instantly? No thanks. We're just losing our ability to have skills and have everything handed to us on a silver platter. No wonder America has an entitlement problem. Being able to complete a very difficult challenge like creating a model from scratch is extremely satisfying. But the knowledge that this exists may diminish that feeling significantly.
no. AI needs fresh data to keep creating or it eats its own tail. A.I bros like things very generic and always want to make quick cash. A.I cant create anything new.
congratulations, you've taken the human element out of YET ANOTHER facet of the creative process. and you gotta PAY to use it. you know, there's real people that make 3D models, right? real people that will take that same money you're giving to this ugly thing, and make whatever you ask of them, at the poly count range you specifically specify? creativity is dying live right in front of us, but at least real modelers are still better than this slop. how's the UVs, how's the bending for animation, how's that weight painting coming along? because points are already being docked for the obscenely unnecessary poly count. seriously, if y'all are really considering paying an AI to have your thoughts for you, just consider giving that money to a real actual human being instead.
Corporations want to completely occupy the digital market for themselves, now I went to Google images with a search for "robot ant" and it gave me dozens, if not hundreds, of ugly generation results that look almost indetic, I don't understand supporters of generators who, just for fun, create even more digital garbage turning the internet into a digital garbage dump
This isn't going to remove artists for any project that has adequate budget. The quality of the models aren't good enough. If AI is used, 3d artists will still be needed to fix them. This will however be helpful for solo game devs, with no modelling experience, to at least create a proof of concept. They could pay 3d artists once their game gets funding, otherwise they would never be able to afford commissions.
At the moment AI is progressing at an extremely fast pace, just a year ago it was generating unusuable blobby meshes with awful textures. In 5 years time at this rate most basic modeling work won't be needed at all. Yes a few people might be needed for cleanup but a lot of modeling artists will be out of a job and AI is only going to get better and faster with time. One of two things will happen with most companies, either they will opt for keeping the same amount of emplooyees and produce more content faster and cheaper or they will downsize and produce the same amount of content. I would expect after the initial boom the latter is going to be more likely as we will all be swamped with media. Unfortunately though this is how the world works. No company owes artists a job, they only exist to make money so as soon as something is available that's faster and cheaper you are at risk of being replaced, it's happened throughout history. It's basically the the start of cheap mass produced art. People can still model and sculpt for their own enjoyment though and there will still be people who appreciate manual artistry so it won't kill art.
@@sibience lets me honest, this is OK for prototyping or generic meshes but not good enough for actual in game models. There is no rigs, I created a few for testing added humanoid rigs on blender its not BAD but the textures are low res. This AI helps move along a prototype and make an idea come to life in minutes vs a human who charges 50 usd and up per model for something I wanted to simply try out. 3D artist will NOT loose their jobs over this trust me. Its a good tool to have handy just like chatgpt its a TOOl but will never replace(anytime soon anyway) the jobs. Maybe in 50 years it will give us HD models rigged and animated.
@@RealityScapeStudiosYou basically ignored everything he said and babbled the same delusional stuff like the first comment. AI is developing extremely fast. Wait another year and see how your comment aged like milk.
fact of the matter is until you have complete control over the creation process its just a toy. The most bat shit crazy ideas I have had have all been the result of sodding around with a bit of paper in front of me. An A.I cannot do anything new, only remix what is there and while you can do less with more, the A.I needs new data to keep producing stuff. A huge amount of stuff that goes on with A.I is actually in its current state illegal anyway as no one knows where they are getting their training data from. It has no agency I really don't think artists should be concerned as companies that want to replace everyone with A.I are probably not worth much, No one really likes those guys. No one.
u get 3 free model generations with the starter credits, u can get 6 i think if u redeem a code, some of the youtubers that are showing off rodin have one in their description. also if u share your referal link when u sign up (free) and people join and pay through using it, you will get more, so technically u could use it for free, if people use your link. i got 10 free credits and i only posted the link in 1 place, so its doable, but it is worth paying for, its far better than all the others
I’m a hobbiest. I’ve used this application twice. Both times I got back a 3D model near 85-90% of what I wanted. It’s not perfect, but it’s going to save me a lot of time and frustration in creating the models I want for a project. Again, this is my hobby. I don’t get paid to do it and my modeling skills can’t hold a candle to the things I’ve seen. This gets me off to a running start on what I want to do. I think it’s incredible!
The mind blowing thing that the AI models generated are NEATLY QUADS!!! 🤯🤯🤯
I would bet that part is probably not the AI... AI probably generates a very detailed triangular mesh, it gets remeshed with something similar to the add-on Quad Remesher, and the detail gets proyected on the retopo...
@@JorgeMarquezIO Owh, make sense.
true, remeshing tools have existed for some time now, the Ai's are just getting better at capturing detail
I always said being a specialist is dangerous, bcz it only takes one breakthrough to remove your importance. gg to all 3d modelers.
i think fewer and fewer artists have been modeling there own stuff anyways from scratch, most rely on libraries and only model when necessary
@@TopChannel1on1 I've been working in the mobile games industry from a while now, and we certainly spend everyday modeling
@@TopChannel1on1 Not at all. Senior character artist here working in AAA. Spends all my day modeling and when we implement tools that allow us to reuse stuff or use already made assets, it's just more time for us to model even more stuff. These tools of 3d model generation are pretty basic models using some sort of texture projection and auto remesher. Nothing close to industry needs or quality standards. One day, sure.
3d modeller for a fashion company. I can say that ai and photogrammetry it still not good enough for us to use. With AI we have the problem of uploading unpublished designs. With Photogrammetry we have the problem of interpreting glossy and transparent objects. Im modelling shoes and bags every day and for the stuff we’re doing, unless they decide they can no longer afford 3d modelers to keep their standards up, we are safe.
Production ready... That's rich...
Hey why not covering the new luma lab ai video generator, I think in the future it could be viable to replace hiring motion designers with
Nice. I know Nvidia has some amazing stuff coming, but this is ALREADY looking REALLY good.
yeah, i like how the mesh is actually usable
@@TopChannel1on1 - definitely one of the best I've seen. Probably better than meshy.
But in order to make it usable for games for example it needs to be more than just cranky 3d model, but it surely useful for animations!
You can import to unreal and rig it up
It’s amazing tbh
As a 3D Artist… it’s been real 🫡
Imagine dedicating half your life to something to be replaced, sadge!
Just last year I was saying topology would be a massive hurdle to get clean 3D models... 5:20 Now here we are.
Things caught up QUICK.
3D Artists aren't going away. You can generate great starting models, but the RODIN ai creates models that aren't as nice as the drawings it gets which means that a human artist then needs to go in and add details and redo certain areas that got clapped together. Because AI isn't able to think or even respond to basic requests, it therefore can't do these details.
Hello. Can AI replace us in the near future? If algorithms for easy retopo and UV unwrapping are developed with AI, I don’t think this will hinder me. But if a prompter can produce a professional mesh in 3 seconds, does easy retopo and UV unwrapping have any meaning? No matter how much we optimize our art in terms of time, does our imagination have any significance compared to easily and effortlessly creating a 3D mesh with a prompter? In such a case, can I still be an artist?
its impossible to tell the future but i think artists will just adapt like we have done before, AI hype is already slowing down, which means less investment which slows down Ai research, but again its impossible to predict
Wow, amazing!
Hi, thanks. Is it reliable for a paid subscription? is there no problem?
Do your credits roll over each month?
Why you had to jump-scare me with that sora-octo-whale tho?
Hello, does this platform also save the model's texture?
yes it does
Rodins amazing but the uvs seem all screwed up when u unwrap them in blender, is there a way to fix them or do we have to make new materials? just curious, am totally new to all this im just learning blender because of finding out about rodin
Tex tools addon project n bake ur shit
i gave my referels to get credit , the credit never came
Nice!!!! Can the part be exported individual rather than together?
like which part
So if i have an alien forest picture and i want to use similar alien plants but different scenery, how can i do that? Basically im trying to get multiple images of an alien planet that has the same theme
0:57 the tech looks good. but your observational skills. The model is not exact. AI calculated the ornamentation on that chair to look like a ball sack. Funny, but not accurate.
There are plenty of reasons to want to skip certain parts of modelling. Infuriating retopology, making mistakes and having to redo a piece... Sure. I think that's what this addon should've been about, clipping out retopology because *no one* likes it. But to just create a model off the cusp of a few clicks, which will come later in the future, from 0 to done instantly? No thanks. We're just losing our ability to have skills and have everything handed to us on a silver platter. No wonder America has an entitlement problem. Being able to complete a very difficult challenge like creating a model from scratch is extremely satisfying. But the knowledge that this exists may diminish that feeling significantly.
no. AI needs fresh data to keep creating or it eats its own tail. A.I bros like things very generic and always want to make quick cash. A.I cant create anything new.
@@potoo6122 Yet. But there are plenty of people feeding it new stuff so it's only a matter of time.
congratulations, you've taken the human element out of YET ANOTHER facet of the creative process. and you gotta PAY to use it.
you know, there's real people that make 3D models, right?
real people that will take that same money you're giving to this ugly thing, and make whatever you ask of them, at the poly count range you specifically specify?
creativity is dying live right in front of us, but at least real modelers are still better than this slop.
how's the UVs, how's the bending for animation, how's that weight painting coming along? because points are already being docked for the obscenely unnecessary poly count.
seriously, if y'all are really considering paying an AI to have your thoughts for you, just consider giving that money to a real actual human being instead.
Corporations want to completely occupy the digital market for themselves, now I went to Google images with a search for "robot ant" and it gave me dozens, if not hundreds, of ugly generation results that look almost indetic, I don't understand supporters of generators who, just for fun, create even more digital garbage turning the internet into a digital garbage dump
This isn't going to remove artists for any project that has adequate budget. The quality of the models aren't good enough. If AI is used, 3d artists will still be needed to fix them.
This will however be helpful for solo game devs, with no modelling experience, to at least create a proof of concept. They could pay 3d artists once their game gets funding, otherwise they would never be able to afford commissions.
At the moment AI is progressing at an extremely fast pace, just a year ago it was generating unusuable blobby meshes with awful textures. In 5 years time at this rate most basic modeling work won't be needed at all. Yes a few people might be needed for cleanup but a lot of modeling artists will be out of a job and AI is only going to get better and faster with time.
One of two things will happen with most companies, either they will opt for keeping the same amount of emplooyees and produce more content faster and cheaper or they will downsize and produce the same amount of content. I would expect after the initial boom the latter is going to be more likely as we will all be swamped with media.
Unfortunately though this is how the world works. No company owes artists a job, they only exist to make money so as soon as something is available that's faster and cheaper you are at risk of being replaced, it's happened throughout history. It's basically the the start of cheap mass produced art.
People can still model and sculpt for their own enjoyment though and there will still be people who appreciate manual artistry so it won't kill art.
@@sibience lets me honest, this is OK for prototyping or generic meshes but not good enough for actual in game models. There is no rigs, I created a few for testing added humanoid rigs on blender its not BAD but the textures are low res. This AI helps move along a prototype and make an idea come to life in minutes vs a human who charges 50 usd and up per model for something I wanted to simply try out. 3D artist will NOT loose their jobs over this trust me. Its a good tool to have handy just like chatgpt its a TOOl but will never replace(anytime soon anyway) the jobs. Maybe in 50 years it will give us HD models rigged and animated.
@@RealityScapeStudiosYou basically ignored everything he said and babbled the same delusional stuff like the first comment. AI is developing extremely fast. Wait another year and see how your comment aged like milk.
fact of the matter is until you have complete control over the creation process its just a toy. The most bat shit crazy ideas I have had have all been the result of sodding around with a bit of paper in front of me. An A.I cannot do anything new, only remix what is there and while you can do less with more, the A.I needs new data to keep producing stuff. A huge amount of stuff that goes on with A.I is actually in its current state illegal anyway as no one knows where they are getting their training data from. It has no agency I really don't think artists should be concerned as companies that want to replace everyone with A.I are probably not worth much, No one really likes those guys. No one.
Is it free?
but it is not for free I presume !
u get 3 free model generations with the starter credits, u can get 6 i think if u redeem a code, some of the youtubers that are showing off rodin have one in their description.
also if u share your referal link when u sign up (free) and people join and pay through using it, you will get more, so technically u could use it for free, if people use your link. i got 10 free credits and i only posted the link in 1 place, so its doable, but it is worth paying for, its far better than all the others
Temp mail
im beginner are so cooked
not free
I genuinely hate this
3 hours ago
If anyones worried about this, then you shouldnt consider yourself an artist 😂